|
|
Section 3 : Client Views Of TAGS/HRDC Program
3.1 Client Attitudes Towards the TAGS/HRDC Program Most clients feel that the main purpose of TAGS/HRDC is to provide income support. In response to the question "What is the main purpose of TAGS?", clients responded: Male clients, Newfoundland clients and fishers are more likely to see the purpose of TAGS/HRDC as income support. Younger clients, targeted clients and clients with higher education are more likely to support goals of training and jobs outside fishery. 3.2 Attitudes Towards the Future After TAGS - Attitudes of TAGS/HRDC clients towards the future are not associated with duration of their eligibility.
- Clients are uncertain about their future after TAGS. in response to the question "What will happen when TAGS finishes in 1999?":
35 percent don't know or are not sure what will happen; 36 percent say they will be on their own or on welfare; 26 percent say fishery will reopen; only 4 percent say TAGS will be replaced or extended. - Attitudes become more realistic once eligibility has expired:
fishery will reopen (TAGS/HRDC Clients = 26 percent, NCARP roll-over clients = 11 percent); recipients will be on their own (TAGS/HRDC Clients = 17 percent, NCARP roll-over clients = 39 percent); recipients will be on Social Assistance (TAGS/HRDC Clients = 19 percent, NCARP roll-over clients = 22 percent); - Newfoundland clients slightly more likely than clients in Nova Scotia to expect the fishery to reopen.
3.3 Attitudes Towards Changes in TAGS/HRDC Nearly three-quarters of TAGS/HRDC clients are aware of past program changes and expect future changes. The same proportion expects reductions in payment levels and cuts in eligibility. After cuts in administration, training and adjustment services, clients prefer cuts in benefit levels rather than duration. In surveys and focus groups clients describe uncertainty about TAGS/HRDC programs as a source of stress and as a constraint on their adjustment decision-making. 3.4 Attitudes Towards Counselling Clients rated highly the attitudes, ability of counsellors and the utility of the information they provided about TAGS/HRDC: - there are no significant differences in the ratings when gender, education level or fishing sector is considered. There are modest differences among CECs.
TAGS/HRDC clients are three times as likely to have talked to a counsellor as members of the non-participant comparison group. Clients have a positive view of counsellors' attitudes and abilities, but this is not associated with level of adjustment.
|