![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This report presents findings from the formative evaluation of the Canada/Alberta Labour Market Development Agreement (LMDA) in the form of an Overview Report. Other findings reports in this series include a Technical Report, an Evaluation Brief, Recommendations and Lessons Learned. 1.1 The Canada/Alberta Labour Market Development AgreementThe governments of Alberta and Canada entered into a joint agreement (the first for any jurisdiction) on December 6, 1996 with regard to the provincial management of labour market development programs in Alberta. Each agreed to work together in the implementation of Alberta Programs and Services (APSs) and in the operation of the National Employment Services (NES). The LMDA came into effect on November 1, 1997. Delivery is through staff of Alberta's Advanced Education and Career Development (AECD)2 department or third party service providers, using funding from the EI (Part II) Account of Human Resource Development Canada (HRDC). 1.1.1 Goals and Key PrinciplesThe APSs under the LMDA are to assist individuals to prepare for, obtain and maintain employment resulting in savings to the Employment Insurance (EI) Account. In so doing, a return on investment will be achieved through a reduction in dependency on Employment Insurance (EI) and in social assistance (in the form of Support for Independence [SFI] benefits, through Alberta Family and Social Services [AFSS]), and additional tax revenues through increased employment. The key principles of the Canada/Alberta LMDA include:
1.1.2 Alberta Programs and ServicesThere are seven APSs under the LMDA, which are the subject of this evaluation:3
1.1.3 EligibilityEligibility under the LMDA is restricted to unemployed individuals pursuant to the Employment Insurance Act (without employment and actively seeking employment). To be eligible for participation in one of the above-mentioned programs, individuals must fall into one of the following groups:
Apprentices who obtain a layoff of convenience from their employers to attend the in-school component of their apprenticeship training, and who qualify as active claimants are also considered participants under the LMDA. In addition, unemployed individuals who are not eligible for funding support through EI Part II may receive services under employment support measures (CEAS and JP). Uninsured individuals may also benefit indirectly through community partnership activities supported under LLMP. These "uninsured individuals" (including Supports for Independence recipients and "other Albertans" not in receipt of SFI), are not included in the targets for the LMDA nor in the findings of the formative evaluation. 1.1.4 Accountability FrameworkAlberta and Canada have set up a Results-Based Framework to measure achievement of success. Short-term results are based on performance measures. These track:
Targets are established for fiscal years based on these measures. For 1997-98, established targets are:
In the medium and longer term, other measures to be assessed include:
1.1.5 Other Factors Affecting the LMDAA number of factors, many of which pre-date the implementation of the LMDA, have had a bearing on its development:
1.2 Evaluation of the Canada/Alberta Labour Market Development AgreementAs part of the LMDA, Alberta and Canada have agreed to cooperate in the development and implementation of a three-phased evaluation process. The first phase resulted in the document Logic Models and Evaluation Issues, Questions, Indicators and Data Sources. There are two subsequent phases—a formative phase (the subject of this report) and a summative phase. The formative evaluation began in October 1998 and provides information to enhance the design and delivery of the LMDA and individual APSs. The focus of the summative evaluation will be on measuring the outcomes, impacts and cost-effectiveness of the APSs. Both of these phases use multiple lines of evidence—both qualitative and quantitative. The formative evaluation includes three telephone surveys involving non-apprentice participants (997), comparison group members (426) and apprentices (200). Other data gathering activities include document review and review of secondary data, 61 key informant interviews (involving management, staff and community partners) and 11 focus groups (involving third party delivery agents, employers and participants). In total, 128 individuals were contacted. As comprehensive as these data collection methods and the analysis they support have been, readers are reminded that the formative evaluation represents the very early days of the LMDA in Alberta. Data collection and analysis represents a 15 to 17 month window (up to the early part of 1999) after implementation of a substantially new set of programs and delivery methods in Alberta. As such, the formative evaluation covers a period of significant transition. Transitions continue. We report information on activities conducted after this date that are intended to address concerns identified during our data collection period. However, we have no evidence of the efficacy of these activities. 1.3 This ReportThis report is structured around the key issues of the evaluation:
Note that quotations from the qualitative research are italicized.
|