|
|
Annex 1
Impacts on Participants by Program Type Descriptive Result38
This appendix contains data tables pertaining to the outcomes of PBPMs on clients. Sub-group results that are significantly different from the participant total at the five per cent level or better are labelled with an asterisk. It is important to bear in mind that a true assessment of program impacts can only be made through the modelling of survey results, whereby various potentially confounding factors can be taken into account to provide accurate estimates of PBPM impacts. For example, the fact that one PBPM appears to be more successful than another may have more to do with the characteristics of the PBPM participant (e.g., greater education or motivation) than the PBPM itself. It is those kinds of factors that multivariate analyses can potentially control for, the results of which appear in Section 5.5 of this report. Thus, the presentation of bivariate results in this appendix should be used for descriptive purposes only.
Table D.1 Selected Weighted Employment Outcome Indicators
Among PBPM Participants by Intervention Type and EI/Reachback Status, and Among Comparison Group Members1
|
PBPM Participants by Program Type
|
PBPM Participants by Claim Status
|
Comparison Group by Claim Status
|
Total
|
Empl. Partnership (EP)
|
SE
|
Wage Subsidies (WS)
|
EAS
|
SLG/Fee Payer
|
POT
|
Apprenticeship
|
PBT
|
EI Claimant
|
Reach-back
|
EI Claimant
|
Reach-back
|
1. Ever Had a Job Since End of Program/Reference Date (per cent)
|
Yes |
86 |
95 |
93 |
96* |
81* |
89 |
92 |
91 |
92 |
87 |
85 |
81 |
78* |
No |
13 |
4 |
7 |
3* |
19* |
9 |
7 |
6 |
8 |
12 |
14 |
19 |
22 |
DK/NR |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
n** |
1,393 |
167 |
166 |
160 |
262 |
270 |
133 |
185 |
172 |
754 |
529 |
130 |
335 |
2. Worked 12 Consecutive Weeks Since Completed Program/Reference date (per cent)
|
Yes |
89 |
87* |
94 |
95 |
85* |
91 |
95 |
93 |
96* |
92* |
86* |
83 |
93 |
No |
10 |
13* |
6 |
5 |
15* |
9 |
5 |
6 |
4* |
7* |
14* |
17 |
7 |
DK/NR |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
n** |
1,255 |
157 |
153 |
154 |
210 |
238 |
123 |
173 |
160 |
691 |
467 |
103 |
280 |
3. Number of Employers Since End of Program/Reference Date (per cent)***
|
One |
60 |
77* |
88* |
79* |
57* |
59* |
49* |
72 |
48* |
56 |
58 |
77 |
78* |
Two |
26 |
15* |
7* |
14* |
30* |
23 |
28* |
17 |
30* |
27 |
23* |
12 |
16 |
Three or more |
13 |
8 |
4* |
6* |
13 |
15* |
23* |
8 |
22* |
16 |
18** |
11 |
6 |
DK/NR |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Mean |
1.6 |
1.4* |
1.2* |
1.3* |
1.6 |
1.7* |
1.9* |
1.4 |
1.8* |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
n** |
1,193 |
146 |
145 |
145 |
201 |
229 |
115 |
161 |
156 |
658 |
442 |
91 |
263 |
Source: Canada/Manitoba LMDA Participant and Comparison Groups Surveys
1 Overall participant results are weighted by program type, region, claimant status and age; Results by program type are weighted by region, claimant status and age; Participant results by claimant status are weighted by program type, region and age; Comparison group results by claimant status are weighted by region and gender.
* Differences statistically significant at the 5 per cent level or better. Significant differences are based on comparisons with similarly weighted participant totals and not the overall participant total presented here.
** Analyses by claimant status exclude respondents whose claimant status is unknown, thus the sum of claimant and reachback cases will be lower than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column.
*** Excludes respondents who have not had a job in the post-program period. |
Table D.2 Employment Status Outcomes: Weighted Percentage Distribution by Employment Status in First Week Following Intervention and at the Time of the Survey1,2
|
PBPM Participants by Program Type
|
PBPM Participants by Claim Status
|
Comparison Group by Claim Status
|
Total
|
Employment Partnerships
|
Self-Employment
|
Wage Subsidies (WS)
|
Employment Assistance Services (EAS)
|
SLG/ Fee Payer
|
POT
|
App
|
PBT
|
EI Claimant
|
Reach- back
|
EI Claimant
|
Reach- back
|
1. Employment Status Week After End of Program (per cent in status)
|
Employment |
56 |
65 |
66 |
84 |
45 |
49 |
57 |
80 |
66 |
54 |
54 |
** |
** |
Self-employed |
3 |
7 |
44* |
1* |
2* |
1* |
1* |
0* |
1* |
3 |
3 |
** |
** |
Employed full-time year round |
29 |
38 |
15* |
57* |
13* |
29* |
26* |
77* |
44 |
33* |
29 |
** |
** |
Employed part-time year round |
11 |
2* |
4* |
17* |
15* |
7 |
18* |
1* |
6 |
4* |
10 |
** |
** |
Employed full-time seasonal |
6 |
9* |
1* |
2 |
9* |
3 |
6 |
1* |
4 |
6 |
4 |
** |
** |
Employed part-time seasonal |
1 |
1 |
0 |
6* |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
** |
** |
Employed on a contract |
3 |
7* |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
9* |
4 |
3 |
** |
** |
Employed casual |
3 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
6* |
3 |
0* |
2 |
4 |
2 |
** |
** |
Unemployed and looking for work |
34 |
27 |
15* |
10* |
42* |
39* |
30 |
10* |
27 |
36 |
34 |
** |
** |
Student/in program |
5 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
7* |
1* |
6* |
3 |
** |
** |
Out of labour force |
4 |
4 |
8* |
1* |
4 |
5 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
** |
** |
DK/NR |
3 |
2 |
7 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
** |
** |
n*** |
1,393 |
167 |
166 |
160 |
262 |
270 |
133 |
185 |
172 |
754 |
529 |
** |
** |
2. Employment Status at Time of Survey (per cent
in status)
|
Employment |
70 |
74 |
90 |
84 |
61 |
76 |
79 |
76 |
71 |
70 |
67 |
69 |
72 |
Self-employed |
5 |
7 |
48* |
4* |
3* |
3* |
3* |
2* |
4* |
4 |
7 |
1 |
7 |
Employed full-time year round |
46 |
48 |
23* |
55 |
37* |
52 |
43 |
71* |
48 |
51* |
41* |
29* |
44 |
Employed part-time year round |
10 |
3* |
14 |
22* |
12 |
8 |
23* |
2* |
10 |
8 |
11 |
13 |
15* |
Employed full-time seasonal |
5 |
6 |
2 |
1* |
7* |
3 |
5 |
1* |
3 |
3 |
2 |
13 |
2 |
Employed part-time seasonal |
0 |
2* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
Employed on a contract |
2 |
5* |
2 |
2 |
0* |
6* |
2 |
0* |
5 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
Employed casual |
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
3* |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
1 |
Unemployed and looking for work |
18 |
19* |
3* |
11 |
23* |
15 |
14 |
5* |
20* |
19 |
23* |
19 |
7 |
Student/in program |
8 |
2* |
3 |
3 |
9 |
5 |
6 |
18* |
1* |
7 |
5* |
1 |
0 |
Out of labour force |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
6* |
3 |
2 |
1* |
9* |
2 |
4 |
9 |
19 |
DK/NR |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
754 |
529 |
131 |
336 |
n*** |
1,393 |
167 |
166 |
160 |
262 |
270 |
133 |
185 |
172 |
70 |
67 |
69 |
72 |
Source: Canada/Manitoba LMDA Participant and Comparison Groups Surveys
1 Wage Subsidies and Employment Partnership participants who reported that their wage subsidies employment had continued beyond the funded period were assigned an employment status of "full-time employed". Self-Employment participants whose business was still in operation at the time of the survey were assigned an employment status of "self-employed".
2 Overall participant results are weighted by program type, region, claimant status and age; Participant results by program type are weighted by region, claimant status and age; Participant results by claimant status are weighted by program type, region and age; Comparison group results by claimant status are weighted by region and gender.
* Differences statistically significant at the five per cent level or better. Significant differences are based on comparisons with similarly weighted totals and not the overall total presented here.
** Question not on comparison group questionnaire.
*** Respondents who have participated in multiple interventions are counted for each program in which they have participated. Thus, the sum of n's for each program will be higher than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column. Furthermore, analyses by claimant status exclude respondents whose claimant status is unknown, thus the sum of claimant and reachback cases will be lower than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column. |
Table D.3 Pre and Post-Intervention Employment Status for Participant and Comparison Groups by Claimant Status1,2
|
Participant Total
|
Participants
|
Comparison Group
|
|
EI Claimant
|
Reachback
|
EI Claimant
|
Reachback
|
Pre
|
Post
|
Change
|
Pre
|
Post
|
Change
|
Pre
|
Post
|
Change
|
Pre
|
Post
|
Change
|
Pre
|
Post
|
Change
|
Employed |
33 |
70
|
37 |
33 |
70
|
37 |
27 |
67
|
40 |
71 |
69
|
-2 |
75 |
72
|
-3 |
Self- employed |
1 |
5
|
4 |
0* |
4
|
4 |
2* |
7*
|
5 |
4 |
1
|
-3 |
5 |
7
|
2 |
Full-time year-round |
16 |
46
|
30 |
22* |
51*
|
29 |
13* |
41*
|
28 |
42* |
29* |
-13 |
47* |
44
|
-3 |
Part-time year-round |
6 |
10
|
4 |
4 |
8*
|
4 |
6 |
11
|
5 |
12 |
13
|
1 |
14* |
15
|
1 |
Full-time seasonal |
4 |
5
|
1 |
5* |
3
|
-2 |
1* |
2
|
1 |
5 |
13* |
8 |
4 |
2
|
-2 |
Part-time seasonal |
3 |
0
|
-3 |
1* |
0
|
-1 |
3 |
1
|
-2 |
4 |
3
|
-1 |
3 |
1
|
-2 |
Contract |
0 |
2
|
2 |
0 |
3
|
3 |
0 |
1
|
1 |
1 |
4
|
3 |
1 |
2
|
1 |
Casual |
3 |
2
|
-1 |
1* |
1
|
0 |
2 |
4*
|
2 |
3 |
6
|
3 |
1 |
1
|
0 |
Unemployed and looking |
47 |
18
|
-29 |
52 |
19
|
-33 |
51 |
23*
|
-28 |
14* |
19* |
5 |
10* |
7* |
-3 |
Student/in program |
6 |
8
|
2 |
2 |
7
|
5 |
3 |
8
|
5 |
2 |
1
|
-1 |
2 |
0
|
-2 |
Out of Labour Force |
9 |
3
|
-6 |
9 |
2
|
-7 |
13 |
5
|
-8 |
10 |
9
|
-1 |
11 |
19* |
7 |
DK/NR |
2 |
0
|
-2 |
2 |
0
|
-2 |
4 |
0
|
-4 |
2 |
0
|
-2 |
1 |
0
|
-1 |
Unweighted n** |
1,393
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
146
|
131
|
|
354
|
336
|
|
Source: Canada/Manitoba LMDA Participant and Comparison Groups Surveys
1 Pre-intervention employment status refers to the week prior to starting their intervention/reference date and post-intervention employment status refers to respondents' employment status at the time of the survey.
2 Overall participant results are weighted by program type, region, claimant status and age; Participant results by claimant status are weighted by program type, region and age; Comparison group results by claimant status are weighted by region and gender.
* Differences statistically significant at the 5 per cent level or better. Significant differences are based on comparisons with similarly weighted participant totals and not the overall participant total presented here.
** Analyses by claimant status exclude respondents whose claimant status is unknown, thus the sum of claimant and reachback cases will be lower than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column.
Since very low proportions of "unknown" cases were found in certain categories, such as "unemployed and looking", the overall proportion of cases in some employment categories was lower than the proportion of claimants or reachbacks in their categories. |
Table D.4 Pre and Post-Intervention1 Employment Status by Program Type2
|
PBPM Participants by Program Type
|
Participant Total
|
Employment Partnerships
|
Self- Employment (SE)
|
Wage Subsidies (WS)
|
Employment Assistance Services (EAS)
|
SLG/Fee Payer
|
POT
|
Apprenticeship
|
PBT
|
Pre
|
Post
|
Pre
|
Post
|
Pre
|
Post
|
Pre
|
Post
|
Pre
|
Post
|
Pre
|
Post
|
Pre
|
Post
|
Pre
|
Post
|
Pre
|
Post
|
Employment |
33 |
70
|
18 |
74
|
23 |
90
|
41 |
84
|
26 |
61
|
32 |
76
|
31 |
79
|
82 |
76
|
23 |
71
|
Self-employed |
1 |
5
|
3 |
7
|
7* |
48* |
1 |
4* |
0 |
3* |
2 |
3* |
1 |
3* |
0 |
2* |
0 |
4*
|
Full-time year-round |
16 |
46
|
4* |
48
|
7* |
23* |
11* |
55
|
6* |
37* |
14* |
52
|
16 |
43
|
74* |
71* |
10* |
48
|
Part-time year-round |
6 |
10
|
1* |
3* |
3* |
14
|
18* |
22* |
6 |
12
|
7 |
8
|
7 |
23* |
2* |
2* |
5 |
10
|
Full-time seasonal |
4 |
5
|
4 |
6
|
2 |
2
|
6 |
1* |
4 |
7* |
4 |
3
|
2 |
5
|
5 |
1* |
3 |
3
|
Part-time seasonal |
3 |
0
|
0 |
2* |
0 |
0
|
4* |
0
|
5* |
0
|
1 |
1
|
1 |
1
|
1 |
0
|
2 |
0
|
Contract |
0 |
2
|
4* |
5* |
1 |
2
|
1 |
2
|
0 |
0* |
1 |
6* |
0 |
2
|
0 |
0* |
2 |
5
|
Casual |
3 |
2
|
2 |
3
|
3 |
1
|
0 |
0
|
5* |
2
|
3 |
3* |
4 |
2
|
0 |
0
|
1 |
1
|
Unemployed and looking |
47 |
18
|
76* |
19* |
54 |
3* |
42* |
11
|
52 |
23* |
51 |
15
|
56 |
14
|
12* |
5* |
65* |
20*
|
Student/in program |
6 |
8
|
0 |
2
|
3 |
3
|
2 |
3
|
6 |
9
|
4 |
5
|
1 |
6
|
1 |
18
|
1 |
1
|
Out of labour force |
9 |
3
|
5 |
4
|
17 |
3
|
5 |
2
|
10 |
6
|
12 |
3
|
11 |
2
|
6 |
1
|
11 |
9
|
DK/NR |
2 |
0
|
1 |
0
|
4 |
0
|
6 |
0
|
3 |
0
|
1 |
0
|
2 |
0
|
0 |
0
|
1 |
0
|
Unweighted n** |
1,393
|
|
167
|
|
166
|
|
160
|
|
262
|
|
270
|
|
133
|
|
185
|
|
172
|
|
Source: Canada/Manitoba LMDA Participant Survey
1Pre-intervention employment status refers to the week prior to starting their intervention/reference date and post-intervention employment status refers to respondents' employment status at the time of the survey.
2 Overall results are weighted by program type, region, claimant status and age; Results by program type are weighted by region, claimant status and age.
* Differences statistically significant at the 5 per cent level or better. Significant differences are based on comparison with similarly weighted totals and not the overall total presented here.
** Respondents who have participated in multiple interventions are counted for each program in which they have participated. Thus, the sum of n's for each program will be higher than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column. |
Table D.5 Retention: Weighted Percentage of Job Placement Program Participants Hired by Host Employer Following the Intervention, and Other Retention Measures, by Program Type and Claimant Status1
|
Participant Total
|
Program Type
|
Claimant Status
|
|
|
Wage
Subsidies
|
Employment
Partnerships
|
EI
Claimant
|
Reachback
|
Percentage of participants hired by host employers** |
60 |
72 |
48 |
48 |
62 |
Percentage of those hired by host employer who were hired into same job as wage-subsidy job |
59 |
67* |
50* |
56 |
51 |
Percentage distribution of those hired back by host employer, by type of job hired into: |
Full-time year-round |
58 |
66* |
41* |
73* |
68 |
Part-time year-round |
13 |
20* |
6* |
4 |
5 |
Full-time seasonal |
14 |
8* |
24* |
5* |
10 |
Part-time seasonal |
3 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
Casual/contract |
8 |
0* |
21* |
1 |
8 |
DK/NR |
5 |
3 |
6 |
10 |
5 |
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Unweighted n*** |
191 |
122 |
70 |
62 |
104 |
Source: Canada/Manitoba LMDA Participant Survey
1 Overall results are weighted program type, region, claimant status and age; Results by program type are weighted by region, claimant status and age; Results by claimant status are weighted by program type, region and age.
*Differences statistically significant at the 5 per cent or better level. Significant differences are based on comparisons with similarly weighted participant totals and not the overall participant total presented here.
**Only Wage Subsidies and Employment Partnership participants were asked this question; those who left the program before completion of the wage subsidy were coded as "not hired".
*** Analyses by claimant status exclude respondents whose claimant status is unknown, thus the sum of claimant and reachback cases will be lower than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column. Respondents who have participated in multiple interventions are counted for each program in which they have participated. Thus, the sum of n's for each program will be higher than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column. |
Table D.6 Characteristics of Current or Most Recent Job Among Participants and Comparison Group by Intervention Type1 and Claim Status
|
PBPM Participants by Program Type
|
PBPM Participants by Claim Status
|
Comparison Group by Claim Status
|
|
Total
|
Employment Partnerships (EP)
|
Self- Employment
|
Wage Subsidies (WS)
|
Employment Assistance Services (EAS)
|
SLG/ Fee Payer
|
POT
|
App
|
PBT
|
EI Claimant
|
Reach- back
|
EI Claimant
|
Reach- back
|
1. Same Job as One Year Before Intervention (Among
those with a job before)**(per cent)
|
Yes |
26 |
12* |
11* |
11* |
18* |
21* |
27 |
75* |
26 |
28 |
25 |
53 |
53 |
No |
73 |
88* |
89* |
89* |
81* |
79* |
72 |
23* |
74 |
72 |
72 |
47 |
40 |
DK/NR |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
8 |
Unweighted n*** |
964 |
126 |
115 |
104 |
149 |
186 |
96 |
141 |
121 |
564 |
396 |
82 |
232 |
2. Hours Per Week (Less DK/NR) (per cent)
|
1-30 |
21 |
8* |
26* |
35* |
30* |
14* |
30* |
7* |
14* |
10 |
29 |
37 |
27 |
31-40 |
58 |
69* |
31* |
50* |
48* |
68* |
56 |
72* |
69* |
69 |
54 |
40 |
50 |
>40 |
21 |
23 |
43* |
14* |
21 |
18 |
14* |
22 |
17 |
21 |
18 |
23 |
24 |
Mean |
37.8 |
40.6* |
42.0* |
34.7* |
35.7* |
38.6 |
36.5 |
40.7* |
40.6* |
40.3 |
36.2 |
37.5 |
37.4 |
Unweighted n*** |
1,134 |
138 |
139 |
138 |
195 |
214 |
108 |
149 |
152 |
606 |
523 |
91 |
257 |
3. Type of Job (per cent)
|
Year round |
75 |
66* |
80 |
92* |
71* |
71* |
82 |
89* |
73 |
78 |
73 |
61 |
83 |
Seasonal |
14 |
28* |
11 |
6* |
18* |
8* |
12 |
9* |
16 |
11 |
12 |
28 |
10 |
Casual/Contract |
10 |
6 |
8 |
2* |
11 |
16* |
5 |
2* |
11 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
5 |
DK/NR |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
Unweighted n*** |
1,169 |
143 |
147 |
139 |
199 |
224 |
113 |
152 |
154 |
623 |
541 |
91 |
261 |
4. Weekly Earnings (Less DK/NR and Outliers)
|
<$250 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
37* |
14 |
7* |
21 |
6 |
13 |
6 |
19 |
10 |
13 |
$251-$500 |
57 |
51 |
43* |
47 |
64* |
55 |
54 |
50 |
56 |
59 |
53 |
44 |
36 |
$500+ |
32 |
37 |
46* |
16* |
23* |
39 |
25 |
44* |
31 |
34 |
28 |
47 |
51 |
Mean ($) |
469 |
498 |
638 |
334 |
419 |
495 |
436 |
536 |
484 |
489 |
449 |
532 |
547 |
Unweighted n*** |
1,013 |
127 |
99 |
128 |
181 |
198 |
102 |
131 |
136 |
534 |
474 |
81 |
226 |
Source: Canada/Manitoba LMDA Participant and Comparison Groups Surveys
1 Overall participant results are weighted by program type, region, claimant status and age; Participant results by program type are weighted by region, claimant status and age; Participant results by claimant status are weighted by program type, region and age; Comparison group results by claimant status are weighted by region and gender.
* Differences statistically significant at the 5 per cent level or better. Significant differences are based on comparisons with similarly weighted totals and not the overall total presented here.
** Among those with a job following their intervention/reference date.
*** Respondents who have participated in multiple interventions are counted for each program in which they have participated. Thus, the sum of n's for each program will be higher than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column. Furthermore, analyses by claimant status exclude respondents whose claimant status is unknown, thus the sum of claimant and reachback cases will be lower than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column. |
Table D.7 Jobless and Job Search Outcomes: Weighted Percentage Distribution by Duration of Jobless Spell and a Job Search as a Proportion of Time Since Intervention among PBPM Participants and Comparison Group Members by Intervention Type and EI/Reachback
Status1
|
PBPM Participants by Program Type
|
PBPM Participants by Claim Status
|
Comparison Group by Claim Status
|
|
Total
|
Employment Partnerships
|
Self-Employment
|
Wage Subsidies (WS)
|
Employment Assistance Services (EAS)
|
SLG/ Fee Payer
|
POT
|
App
|
PBT
|
EI Claimant
|
Reach-back
|
EI Claimant
|
Reach-back
|
1. Number of Weeks Not Working
Since End of Program/Reference** Date as a Percentage of Time Since
Program/Reference Date (per cent)
|
0% |
39 |
45 |
61* |
53 |
27* |
39* |
38 |
70* |
31 |
40 |
40 |
37 |
63* |
1-25% |
37 |
41 |
19* |
33 |
38 |
39 |
52* |
25* |
46* |
37 |
35 |
32 |
18 |
26-50% |
13 |
8 |
5 |
8 |
14 |
14 |
7 |
3 |
15 |
13 |
13 |
19 |
5 |
51-100% |
11 |
6 |
15 |
6 |
21* |
8* |
3 |
2 |
8 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
14 |
Mean (%) |
17.6 |
13.5* |
15.7 |
10.6 |
26.8* |
15.3 |
9.5 |
4.7* |
16.5 |
16.6 |
20.0 |
20.7* |
15.7* |
Unweighted n*** |
1,249 |
153 |
151 |
148 |
230 |
243 |
112 |
171 |
163 |
692 |
476 |
134 |
334 |
2. Number of Weeks Looking for Work Since End of Program/Reference Date**** as a Percentage of Time Unemployed Since Program/Reference Date (per cent)
|
0% |
17 |
11 |
24 |
19 |
13* |
17 |
20 |
44* |
16 |
15 |
17 |
38 |
60 |
1-25% |
4 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
9 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
26-50% |
5 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
51-100% |
74 |
82 |
69 |
60* |
73 |
78 |
72 |
50* |
80* |
79 |
70 |
53* |
30* |
Mean (%) |
75.1 |
81 |
70.2 |
67.1 |
75.1 |
77.9 |
72.8 |
48.9* |
79.7 |
79.4* |
69.6* |
54.7* |
31.5* |
Unweighted n*** |
745 |
93 |
58 |
73 |
170 |
167 |
74 |
49 |
117 |
387 |
295 |
81 |
106 |
Source: Canada/Manitoba LMDA Participant and Comparison Group Surveys
1 Overall participant results are weighted by program type, region, claimant status and age; Participant results by program type are weighted by region, claimant status and age; Participant results by claimant status are weighted by program type, region and age; Comparison group results by claimant status are weighted by region and gender.
* Differences statistically significant at the 5 per cent level or better. Significant differences are based on comparison with similarly weighted totals and not the overall total presented here.
** Excludes miscodes where weeks jobless exceeds weeks since intervention.
*** Respondents who have participated in multiple interventions are counted for each program in which they have participated. Thus, the sum of n's for each program will be higher than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column. Furthermore, analyses by claimant status exclude respondents whose claimant status is unknown, thus the sum of claimant and reachback cases will be lower than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column.
**** Includes those who were not unemployed since the interventions; excludes miscodes where weeks looking for work while jobless exceeded weeks since intervention. |
Table D.8 Job Search Activities:1 Weighted Percentage Distribution by Job Search Activities Among PBPM Participants by Intervention Type and EI/Reachback Status, and Among Comparison Group Members2
|
PBPM Participants by Program Type
|
PBPM Participants by Claim Status
|
Comparison Group by Claim Status
|
|
Total
|
Employment Partnerships
|
Self- Employment
|
Wage Subsidies (WS)
|
Employment Assistance Services (EAS)
|
SLG/ Fee Payer
|
POT
|
App
|
PBT
|
EI Claimant
|
Reach- back
|
EI Claimant
|
Reach- back
|
What were you doing to find a job?
|
Sent resumes, application |
74 |
75 |
64 |
59* |
76* |
75* |
63 |
39* |
70 |
72 |
78 |
44 |
55 |
Resource centre/checked job bank |
51 |
46 |
36 |
33* |
57* |
41 |
43 |
18* |
39 |
53* |
39* |
47 |
31 |
Word of mouth/ friends/relatives |
47 |
38 |
37 |
38 |
48* |
47 |
50 |
38 |
37 |
52* |
45* |
42 |
44 |
Made telephone inquiries with employers |
47 |
31* |
39 |
37 |
54* |
38 |
46 |
20* |
39 |
48* |
39* |
26 |
16 |
Made personal visits to employer |
47 |
43 |
43 |
43 |
50* |
41 |
41 |
19* |
43 |
46 |
42 |
47 |
30 |
Newspapers/ magazines |
26 |
15* |
25 |
41* |
30* |
23 |
23 |
16 |
14* |
24 |
17* |
50 |
38 |
Employment agency |
17 |
24* |
25* |
12 |
19 |
17 |
12 |
2* |
11* |
19 |
17 |
11 |
4 |
Appointment with employment counsellor |
16 |
11 |
12 |
9 |
19* |
7* |
15 |
2* |
15 |
16 |
12* |
7 |
0 |
Went to a job search workshop |
13 |
14 |
8 |
19* |
16* |
5* |
8 |
3* |
11 |
13 |
9* |
— |
— |
Internet |
5 |
5 |
11* |
4 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
7* |
4 |
14 |
9 |
N** |
828 |
113 |
82 |
74 |
205 |
186 |
85 |
39 |
120 |
431 |
324 |
83 |
97 |
Source: Canada/Manitoba LMDA Participant and Comparison Group Surveys
1 Among those who looked for work in the post-intervention period. Responses given by two or fewer per cent of respondents are not reported.
2 Overall participant results are weighted by program type, region, claimant status and age; Participant results by program type are weighted by region, claimant status and age; Participant results by claimant status are weighted by program type, region and age; Comparison group results by claimant status are weighted by region and gender.
*Differences statistically significant at the 5 per cent level or better. Significant differences are based on comparison with similarly weighted totals and not the overall total presented here.
**Respondents who have participated in multiple interventions are counted for each program in which they have participated. Thus, the sum of n's for each program will be higher than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column. Furthermore, Analyses by claimant status exclude respondents whose claimant status is unknown, thus the sum of claimant and reachback cases will be lower than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column. |
Table D.9 Utilization of Income Support: Weighted Percentage Distribution by Use and Weeks of Income Assistance (IA) Among PBPM Participants and Comparison Group by Intervention and EI/Reachback Status1
|
PBPM Participants by Program Type
|
PBPM Participants by Claim Status
|
Comparison Group by Claim Status
|
|
Total
|
Employment Partnerships
|
Self- Employment
|
Wage Subsidies (WS)
|
Employment Assistance Services (EAS)
|
SLG/ Fee Payer
|
POT
|
App
|
PBT
|
EI Claimant
|
Reach- back
|
EI Claimant
|
Reach-back
|
1. Ever Collected Income Assistance Since End of Program/Reference Date**
|
Yes |
8.6 |
7 |
2.6* |
6.7 |
15.3* |
5.6 |
9.7 |
3.1* |
13.6 |
9 |
9 |
14.2* |
2.7* |
No |
91.4 |
93 |
97.4 |
93.9 |
84.7 |
94.4 |
90.3 |
96.9 |
86.4 |
91 |
91 |
85.8 |
97.3 |
Unweighted n*** |
1,373 |
165 |
164 |
158 |
261 |
267 |
131 |
178 |
171 |
743 |
521 |
129 |
329 |
2. Proportion of Weeks Since Intervention in which IA Collected****
|
Mean (%) |
44 |
59.2 |
57.6 |
25.1 |
63.7* |
53.4 |
54 |
15.1 |
17.2* |
39.4 |
49.9 |
21.1 |
50.1 |
Median (%) |
31.2 |
17.2 |
50.2 |
16 |
50.9 |
54.9 |
45.5 |
15.1 |
11 |
24.5 |
50.9 |
11.1 |
49.9 |
3. Ever Collected Employment Insurance Since End of Program/Reference Date*****
|
Yes |
28.9 |
40* |
9.7* |
34.6 |
30.2 |
19.6* |
40.4 |
30.1 |
44.3* |
27* |
39* |
76* |
12* |
No |
71.1 |
60 |
90.3 |
65.4 |
69.8 |
80.4 |
59.6 |
69.9 |
55.7 |
73 |
61 |
24 |
88 |
Unweighted n*** |
1,393 |
167 |
166 |
160 |
262 |
271 |
133 |
185 |
172 |
754 |
529 |
146 |
351 |
4. Number of Weeks in which Employment Insurance Collected**** as a Percentage of Weeks Since Intervention
|
Mean (%) |
15.9 |
12.6 |
12.8 |
17.4 |
21.7* |
11.3 |
20* |
10* |
15 |
13.5* |
16.6* |
25.3* |
9* |
Median (%) |
12.9 |
7.6 |
7.3 |
14.3 |
15.8 |
7.7 |
17.7 |
8.7 |
15.3 |
10.2 |
15.6 |
23.9 |
5.3 |
Source: HRDC administrative data and Canada/Manitoba LMDA Participant and Comparison Group Surveys.
1 Overall participant results are weighted by program type, region, claimant status and age; Participant results by program type are weighted by region, claimant status and age; Participant results by claimant status are weighted by program type, region and age; Comparison group results by claimant status are weighted by region and gender.
* Differences statistically significantly at the 5 per cent level or better. Significant differences are based on comparisons with similarly weighted totals and not the overall total presented here.
** Income Assistance figures computed from survey data.
*** Respondents who have participated in multiple interventions are counted for each program in which they have participated. Thus, the sum of n's for each program will be higher than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column. Furthermore, analyses by claimant status exclude respondents whose claimant status is unknown, thus the sum of claimant and reachback cases will be lower than the total number of cases presented in the leftmost column.
**** Based only on those who received EI or IA.
***** Employment Insurance figures computed from HRDC Administrative
data. |
|