HRDC - User Guide on Contracting HRDC Evaluation Studies

Directorates

· Director General's Office

· Data Development

· Strategic Evaluations

· Partnership and Continuous Evaluations

Publications

· Evaluation Reports

· Evaluation Briefs

· Labour Market Development Agreement Series

· Lessons Learned Series

· Evaluation Tool Kit Series

· Evaluation Forum Newsletter

· From Theory To Practice

Appendix D: Example of Rated Selection Criteria and Rating Results

Selection Criteria	Rate

Technical Proposal	300

• Adequacy of proposed methodologies	120

• Identification of key technical problems and outlines of solutions	100

• Clear understanding of the scope	80

Execution Strategy	380

• Adequacy of work plan, work breakdown structure and schedule of milestones	150

• Sensitivity to work within HRDC	50
• Quality and time control systems and risk management	80

• Adequacy of the proposed level of effort	100

Project Management and Expertise	320

• Qualification and experience of team members	140

• Adequacy of the composition of team	80

• Financial strength and record of the company	100

Total	1, 000

Scoring

Each of the criteria listed above will be assigned a score based on the following scale:

1. 0 (100%) Excellent

0. 9 (90%) Very good

0. 8 (80%) Good

0. 7 (70%) Acceptable (minimum required for passing)

0. 6 (60%) Poor

0. 5 (50%) Very poor

0 Failed to address the criteria

Example of Rating Results for a Particular Bidder:

	Rate	Score Obtained	Total
Technical Proposal
Adequacy of proposed methodologies	120	x 0. 9 =	108
Identification of key technical problems and outlines of solutions	100	x 0. 8 =	80
Clear understanding of the scope	80	x 0. 9 =	72
Sub-total (minimum required =210)	300		260

Execution Strategy
Adequacy of work plan, work breakdown structure and schedule of milestones	150	x 1. 0 =	150
Sensitivity to work within HRDC	50	x 0. 8 =	40
Quality and time control systems and risk management	80	x 0. 9 =	72
Adequacy of the proposed level of effort	100	x 0. 9 =	90
Sub-total (minimum required =266)	380		352

Project Management and Expertise Qualification and experience of team members	140	x 0. 9 =	126
Adequacy of the composition of team	80	x 0. 8 =	64
Financial strength and record of the company	100	x 0. 7 =	70
Sub-total (minimum required =224)	320		260

TOTAL	1,000		872

Last Modified: 2000-02-07	Important Notices