Directorates
·	Director General's Office
·	Data Development
·	Strategic Evaluations
·	Partnership and Continuous Evaluations
Publications
·	Evaluation Reports
·	Evaluation Briefs
·	Labour Market Development Agreement Series
·	Lessons Learned Series
·	Evaluation Tool Kit Series
·	Evaluation Forum Newsletter
·	From Theory To Practice

Small sample sizes limit any inference from the survey results to the larger population of IAM participants or unsuccessful applicants. Some tentative conclusions are possible, however, based on the literature review and the information gathered by the formative evaluation.

• The concept of international student exchange is widely supported within the academic community. Both faculty and students endorse the concept as do studies of international exchange in other countries.
• It is difficult to identify outcomes in terms of changes to career choice or career progress, but most students believe the experience will be beneficial.
• Consideration could be given to allowing faculty to apply more than once. The program will benefit from having experienced faculty run projects. To ensure access to a wider number of faculty members, the program could limit the number of awards within any five-year period.
• Unsuccessful project applicants require additional feedback. These applicants should be viewed as a resource, that with some coaching, could become proponents of successful projects.