![](/web/20060126171643im_/http://www11.hrdc-drhc.gc.ca/edd-img/spacer.gif) |
![](/web/20060126171643im_/http://www11.hrdc-drhc.gc.ca/edd-img/spacer.gif) |
Appendix B Summary of Case Studies
This appendix provides an overview of the key issues/findings drawn form the ten OLT projects sites visited as part of the evaluation. It should be noted that due to differences in the sites (i.e. some sites have been operational for 1-2 years, while other sites had been operational for only a few months, or the project had ended) it was not possible to identify outcomes/barriers for all projects.
The following issues are presented:
- Project overview;
- Target population/client group;
- Client needs (objectives of the project);
- Extent to which client needs/project objectives were met;
- Identification of barriers/factors that affect achievement of the objectives; and,
- Other issues.
Table B-1 Case Study Summary: Learning Technology (LTI) Projects
Project/Issue
|
Dalhousie University — Accessible
Adult Learning in the Health
Profession's: Interactive Use
of Technologies
|
Fanshawe College — Computer-
Based Adult Learning Technologies
|
Royal Roads University —
Community Service Learning
|
Project Overview
|
- distance learning for health professional
from four schools/one program
- invested in technology systems to support
distance education
- to identify strengths and weakness of
e-learning for health professionals
|
- to pilot test and review the effectiveness
of computer mediated learning (CML) for groups that typically encounter barriers
or have limited access to learning technologies
- to develop capacity/expertise in the community to deliver
computer-based training to disadvantaged populations ("train the
trainers")
|
- distance learning for individuals in the
community service (i.e. Non-profit sector)
to earn a graduate (Masters level) degree
- targetted both the student and the not-for-profit organization
- involved a significant degree of mentoring (student and agencies)
- to allow students/mentors from across Canada to share knowledge and
experiences
|
Target Population/Client Groups
|
- health professionals located outside of Halifax
- 38% of students were in rural locations
|
- unemployed/under employed
- women/single parents
- learners with disabilities
- individuals with low literacy levels
- individuals in rural areas that lacked computer/technology infrastructure
|
- individuals working for/with not-forprofit organizations
- community-based learning (distance education program)
|
Client Needs/Project Objectives
|
- to reduce the need for health professionals to move to either
upgrade/enhance skills
- to allow individuals in rural/remote regions access to the program
- to enable clients in centers outside of Halifax to participate in the
program
|
- to provide groups that typically do not
have access to computers/learning
technologies with computer assisted
training/upgrading
- to reduce barriers and/or increase the
comfort levels with the use of computer-based learning technologies
- to allow individuals to upgrade/acquire skills at a pace/time
convenient to them (flexible training model)
|
- this project was developed to test the efficacy of distance learning
for individuals in the not-for-profit sector.
- Project was designed and delivered in 1996 — was considered to be a
pilot project for the use of distance learning models for Royal Roads
University
|
Degree to Which Project Objectives Were Met
|
- only limited end-user information was
available, but evaluation reports indicate a
high level of student/staff support for
the project
- enrollment data indicates that a high
proportion (38%) of students were in
rural/remote locations
|
- the evaluation that was completed for the
project noted that the program was
generally successful in terms of attracting
end users to the centres and providing
"marginalized" groups with an alternative
avenue to acquire additional
skills/upgrading
|
- as a new pilot project at a new University
(Royal Roads had only recently become a
public university in 1996) the project was
characterized by numerous "teething"
problems including lack of structure and
limited ability for students to interact
with faculty.
|
|
- there were some difficulties in terms of
student/staff comfort with technologies
|
- the partnering associated with the project resulted in considerable
synergies with other community-based learning organizations (the scope of
the project was seen to be very wide)
- there was anecdotal evidence of student success including those
students who went on to further education/those who decided on a career
path and those that found work as a result of their training
|
- information obtained during the case study suggested that while the
project was positively viewed by some students, other students were
disappointed with the program. Some of the shortcomings of the program
could be attributed to the limited technology in place in 1996 (high speed
internet connections were not common — contributing to slow access times
to web-based information) as well as the lack of experience in delivering
on-line instruction by the faculty.
- it was noted that the program contributed to information-sharing among
students in the not-for-profit sector and generated "partnerships" among
mentors and students
|
Barriers/Factors Affecting Achievement of Objectives
|
- lack of faculty/student comfort with the technology
- student/faculty ratio's were originally too high (1 to 25-30 but
should have been 1 to 18-20)
- health professionals still require some "hand's on" instructions,
needed for faster turnaround on some issues
|
- technology was not available/developed/appropriate for those with a
disability (deaf/blind)
- individuals with low levels of computer proficiency required
considerable "hands-on" support (technology could not be provided without
considerable support especially for first time users)
- the project sponsor noted that the partnerships required considerable
time/effort to establish and maintain
|
- technology was not highly developed
- faculty was new to using distance learning approaches
- program lacked processes to allow for more "one on one" time between
faculty and students
|
Other Issues
|
- OLT funded project demonstrated the
ability for programs to co-operate in the
e-learning field
- project was noted to serve as a catalyst
for other distance education projects in
the university
- project continued without OLT funding,
but in a weaker form, and partners are
looking for other sources of funding
|
- overall, it was felt that the program
developed self-esteem and career goals
for the end users
- it was noted that the technology should
not be viewed as a replacement for
traditional learning, but rather, as a way to
complement traditional learning models
(some face to face instruction/assistance
would still be required for the end users
that the project targetted
(i.e. Unemployed, single parents,
individuals with low literacy levels etc.).
The technology did, however,
allow learners to progress at their own
pace and not force learners to follow rigid
learning schedules/structures
|
- students felt that learning through this
"non-conventional" approach (in 1996)
was valuable in itself (students had to
learn self-discipline, team problem-solving in a distance environment).
Relationships developed during the program translated into support
networks after program completion
- program was viewed as an important learning project for the
institution, changes were incorporated into subsequent e-learning/distance
education programs that reflected the lessons learned through the
Community Service Learning project
- outcomes of the project included replication of the new distance
learning model in other continuing education initiatives of the university
— and use of the model by other interested universities and learning
institutions
|
Table B-2 Case Study Summary: Learning Technology in the Workplace (LTW) Projects
Project/Issue
|
Alberta Forest Products
Association — Teaching Workplace
Literacy as a Safety Initiative in the
Forestry Industry
|
Office of Partnerships for Advanced
Skills (OPAS) — Worker Online
Reskilling Center (WORC)
|
Conference Board of Canada —
Learning Technologies in
the Workplace
|
Project Overview
|
- design a CD ROM to teach a health and safety program to Alberta
forestry workers, while at the same time addressing functional and
computer literacy issues among the targeted end-users
- the project developed partnerships with colleges (for their experience
in adult learning/literacy issues), a private communications company (to
develop the CD), and key industry representatives (provided technical and
content knowledge)
|
- design a CD ROM to teach a health and safety program to Alberta
forestry workers, while at the same time addressing functional and
computer literacy issues among the targeted end-users the project
- developed partnerships with colleges (for their experience in adult
learning/literacy issues), a private communications company (to develop
the CD), and key industry representatives (provided technical and content
knowledge)
|
- to identify technologies, operational processes and strategies that
would increase and improve learning in the workplace
- to identify management processes/actions that would promote the
investment in workplace-based training/learning
- project was in the development stage at the time of the case study
- this was a research project that was designed to identify the barriers
to workplace training and develop solutions/consensus as to what changes
could be made to enhance the incidence of workplace-based training
|
Target Population/Client Groups
|
- employers and employees of the forest industry in Alberta
- employer companies range from large multi-national companies to small
independent business
|
- employees (to date course content only
developed for one industry sector
visual arts)
|
- as part of the research project, the primary
target populations were employers, although
it was noted that through the research it
would be hoped that strategies would
emerge that would include government,
unions, workers and employers
|
Client Needs/Project Objectives
|
- workplaces include remote, mobile work camps with limited access to
formal classroom training — project objects: increase access to safety
training
- employee groups include workers with poor literacy skills/English as a
second language, among which accident rates tend to be higher — project
objectives reduce accident rates and increase literacy skills
|
- project objectives include developing
increased familiarity of TML among
working adults, increase working adults
accessibility to skill-upgrading, creation
of knowledgeable trainers (in a work
place) to demonstrate the advantages of
TML in the workplace, translate content
of «face-to-face» training to on-line
|
- to identify the benefits of in-house learning programs to Canadian
employers
- to identify the strengths and weaknesses of learning technology in the
workplace (availability, best practices, constraints etc.)
- to identify how learning technologies could be best used in the
workplace — to determine which training programs can be best used in the
workplace to help employees learn and contribute to higher worker
productivity.
|
Degree to Which Project Objectives Were Met
|
- CD-ROM was still being developed,
not yet tested with end-users
|
- relatively new and not yet completed (training course content developed for only one sector - visual arts)
|
- unknown at the present time as project has just started
|
Barriers/Factors Affecting Achievement of Objectives
|
- project partners located in diverse locations through out Alberta, had
increased project start-up time
- computer literacy and general literacy levels a barrier to CD-ROM use
in the field among end-users
- small companies may have limited technical infrastructure for on-line
program delivery (CD-ROM designed to address issues as it only required
single work-site computer)
|
- access to technology and the local
technological infrastructure was noted to
be a barrier in utilizing TML to train employees, particularly in sectors in
which employees work as contractors or have limited funds
- the degree to which learning technology is incorporated in the
existing workplace culture
- attitudinal barriers of members of the cultural sector to technology
and the use of technology
- the need to develop "user-driven" content in training programs, which
matches the learning styles of the targeted end-users
|
- unknown at the present time as project has
just started
|
Other Issues
|
- project is expected to terminated when the
final deliverable is completed, but use of
CD-ROM is expected to produce
immediate and long-term (e.g. safer and
healthier workforce, new literacy,
computer and safety skills for employees,
and increased confidence
with technology)
|
- lack of experience in development and sustaining formal partnerships a
barrier
- partnerships negatively affected by partner fatigue and delays in
receipt of project approval/funding
- project momentum negatively affected by delay between the
developmental
and pilot phases
|
- project would not have occurred without
OLT because benefits from research are not immediate and , therefore,
partnerships were limited and difficult to create
- project expected to provide more sophisticated research models for
e-learning and employee productivity
|
Table B-3 Case Study Summary: Community Learning Networks (CLN) Projects
Project/Issue
|
Vancouver Community
Network (VCN) —
Vancouver Community
Learning Network
|
Monashee Learning and
Training Centre —
Monashee Learning
Community Partnership
|
L'@venue Inc. — The
Community Portal
(arrondissement.com)
|
Creative Retirement
Manitoba — Senior
Learning Network
|
Project Overview
|
- provision of Internet
tools/access and training at
community sites (as of Nov. 1,
seven Internet access sites had
been established for members,
clients and the public)
- internet tools provided include
interactive service directories,
neighbourhood learning
exchanges and portals
- project partnered with CAP
were possible
- volunteers for training
provided through the Technical
Volunteer Web (TVW)
|
- establish a hub/centre of services centered around existing
organizations in community
- services offered are to facilitate life-long learning through
technology based learning programs tailored the needs to the community
(high unemployment rates, poor economic diversification, rural) and
encourage individuals to remain in the community
|
- provide accessible computer information technology and training to an
area of Montreal with economically disadvantaged residents
- develop a community portal with access to community services (mix of
content and services)
- allow participating community groups (approx. 100) and government
bodies to develop and edit their organizations message/content on the
Portal
- disseminate local news and issues to the community, provide discussion
groups and calendar of community events
|
- provide seniors with government and community information on-line
through Community Connections resource networks and access sites
- provide on-site personal assistance to seniors in technology through
courses and mentoring programs partnering with community organizations for
learning network content
|
Target Population/Client Groups
|
- community residents,
including seniors; multi-barrier
individuals (low income &
low literacy), minority
groups, artists
|
- all community members of
Lumby and surrounding
rural/urban areas
|
- community residents of
Mercier/Hochelaga-
Maisonneuve (including,
low-income, disadvantaged
youth, women and seniors)
|
- seniors and their families
in Manitoba
|
Client Needs/Project Objectives
|
- client needs dependent upon community and client group (i.e. senior-
need to reduced social isolation; multi-barrier individuals — need for
increased literacy skills, reduced fear of technology, better understand
of technologies applicability to their lives; artists — need to understand
the use of technology in business development)
- overall project objectives are to increase access, understanding and
use of learning technologies among disadvantaged groups
|
- limited access to learning opportunities given remoteness of community
— project objective: increase access
- poorly diversified (forestry industry) local economy results in
reduced economic opportunity — project objective: provide new learning
opportunities in additional fields of employment
- project objective to reduce poor connectivity, address fear and
mistrust of technology and increase of understanding of the application
and usefulness of learning technology in community
|
- economically disadvantaged community, citizens can not afford to
access technology — project objective increase access
- community members have limited knowledge/access to information
affecting them directly (i.e. health information, tenants' rights,
community events) — portal developed to increase access to information
|
- client group has poor technological skills, fear of technology, few
resources to access technology, can be socially isolated and have limited
access to important information that impacts their quality of life
- objectives of the program are to collect and organize e-information in
a senior friendly useable format, develop training tools for seniors,
provided on-site instruction and technology courses for seniors
|
Degree to Which Project Objectives Were Met
|
- project partnered with
community groups to identify
and tailor technology delivery
to specific needs of
client groups
- partnering allowed access to
multi-barrier/marginalized
groups
- focus groups with senior endusers
indicated program helped
decrease social isolation
(by teaching them how to
e-mail family and friends),
increased direct social
interaction at Internet-access
sites, and increased interest
in and capacity to use
learning technology
|
- project partners/ participants indicated program addressed travel
barriers to continuing education
- provided end-users training opportunities in new fields of work and
updated technological skills
- end-users indicated program increased confidence in learning, reduced
fear of technology and increased individual connectivity (through center
technical infrastructure)
|
- portal not yet launched, impossible to determine whether objectives
met with end-users
- project has developed numerous partnerships (approx. 100 community and
10 government) that will provide content for the portal
|
- learning network currently being developed, some community
organizations developed ability to post modify information
- project partnered with seniors groups were instruction and technology
courses tailored to seniors were being provided
- seniors in end-user focus group indicated courses had improved their
technological skills, increased their confidence and ability to access
information on the net and the learning network
|
Barriers/Factors Affecting Achievement of Objectives
|
- partner resource levels
(lack of resources for
infrastructure; staff)
- client fear/mistrust
of technology
- inability to access specific
isolated target groups (women,
First Nations)
- lack of resources to address
physical handicaps, provide
access to one-to-one training,
training in literacy/numeracy
|
- center's lack of experience
in development and
sustaining formal
partnerships a barrier
|
- low level of community access
to high speed internet
|
- seniors learning needs not addressed by current provincial government,
limits funding available to seniors community organizations
- income level a barrier to seniors access technology (i.e.
computers/Internet)
- fear of technology and lack of understanding of use/relevancy barrier
to senior use of technology
|
Other Issues
|
- lack of experience in development and sustaining formal partnerships
among community organizations a barrier
- lack of tracking of end-users
- partnerships negatively affected by delays in receipt of project
approval/funding (between developmental and pilot phases)
|
- lack of end-users tracking
- program start-up time longer
than expected
- sponsors did not feel that
project was ready to become
sustainable, but it might be
sustainable by end of OLT funding
|
- too early to assess impacts on
end-users
|
- CAP site often take on the specific direction of host organization and
therefore do not fulfill larger community need and difficult to use in
current project
- staff looking for ways to sustain project
|
|