[D] Click for larger version, 15 KB Ziisabaquot, by Louis Ogemah
One way of measuring language continuity or vitality is the INDEX
OF CONTINUITY. This index measures language continuity or vitality
by comparing the number of those who speak an Aboriginal language
at home to the number of those who learned the language as their
mother tongue (consult text Data
and Mapping Notes for further information).
Between 1981 and 1996, the index of continuity declined for all Aboriginal
languages. Although the number of people reporting an Aboriginal mother
tongue increased by nearly 24% between 1981 and 1996, the number of those
who spoke an Aboriginal language at home grew by only 6%. As a result,
for every 100 people with an Aboriginal mother tongue, the number who
used an indigenous language most often at home declined from 76 to 65
between 1981 and 1996.
The index of continuity has some relationship to the ratings of
languages as viable or endangered. Although most languages experienced
a steady erosion in linguistic vitality during these years, endangered
ones suffered the most. For example, the index of continuity for
Salish languages fell from 35 in 1981 to only 12 by 1996. Tlingit
and Kutenai, as languages most often spoken at home, had practically
disappeared by the 1990s. Given that in 1996 there were only 120
people with a Kutenai mother tongue, it is not hard to see why there
is a serious concern for the survival of this language. In contrast,
although the continuity index dipped for the relatively strong Cree
as well, it did so by considerably less: from 78 to 65. Although
Inuktitut did experience a slight erosion in the early 1980's, the
past decade has seen its index stabilize at 84.
Groups that live in remote communities or in settlements with concentrated
populations of indigenous speakers appear to find it easier to retain
their language. Indeed, two such groups, on-reserve Registered Indians
and the Inuit, show the highest indexes of language continuity among all
groups: 80 and 85, respectively. In contrast, non-status Indians and Metis,
who tend to live off-reserve, as well as off-reserve registered Indians
have home-language-mother tongue ratios of 58, 50 and 40 respectively.
This suggests a more pronounced state of language decline. Clearly, the
off-reserve environment poses major threats to Aboriginal languages.
By 1996, these rates of language erosion resulted in strikingly different
continuity levels for viable and endangered languages as a whole. For
every 100 speakers with an Aboriginal mother tongue, an average of about
70 used an Aboriginal home language among viable groups, compared with
30 or fewer among endangered groups.
To properly interpret this map, please consult the text Data
and Mapping Notes.
|