Small Farms: Big on Diversity, Small on Profit
by Roland Beshiri, Statistics Canada
Once experienced, life on the farm-working outdoors,
eating and perhaps selling your home-grown fruit and vegetables, or the
sound of lambs bleating in a spring meadow-is hard to give up. Across
Canada's countryside unique rural farm experiences often keep people on
the land.
One form of rural life is the small farm. (Small farms are defined
here as census
farms with product sales of $40 000 or less before expenses
are deducted, based on the value of a dollar in 1995.) Under this
arbitrary definition small farms accounted for half (or 139 000)
of all Canadian census farms in 1996 (Figure 1).
[D] Click for larger version, 14 KB Figure 1. Small Farms Made up Half of all Census Farms in 1996
Most-and Increasingly More-small Farms are Losing Money
Yet despite their numbers,
many small farms are not making money. After subtracting operating expenses
from the gross farm revenue, the result is a financial loss.
In 1991 a slight majority
of small farms in four provinces reported gross receipts greater than operating
expenses. By 1996, after a 15% increase in the number of small farms that lost
money, none of the provinces could make that claim. Figure 2 shows the provincial
changes in small census farms with financial losses.
Across Canada, 64% of all small farms were losing money: almost
$9 500 on average in 1996, or a loss $1 400 greater than in 1991.
Conversely, 39% of all census farms in Canada were losing money
in 1996.
And what about the 36% of small farms that did make money? Well,
in general they're not getting rich: Their average net farm operating
income was about $6 000 in 1996, or about 30% of the average net
operating income ($20 100) of all census farms. British Columbia
and Ontario stand out with the lowest percentages of small farm
operators who were in the black (24% and 29% respectively) in 1996.
Quebec had the highest percentage with 49%.
Most Small-farm Operators also Work off the Farm
Many farmers work off their farms and 64% of small-farm operators
reported non-farm wages or employment income in 1996, either to
augment their farm income or support it as a hobby, or to pursue
another profession-or for all those reasons. Only 52% of operators
on larger farms reported having an additional source of earnings.
By province, the percentage holding jobs off the small farm ranged
from 59% in Saskatchewan to 73% in Newfoundland and Labrador. These
numbers for small farms are virtually unchanged since 1991. The
average income from non-farm sources for these operators was $29
600, $6 300 more than for operators of larger farms. The gap has
widened by $1 200 since 1991.
The Total Number of Small Farms is Declining
Small farms, both in area
and number, are giving way to large farms. In 1991, small farms accounted for
25% of the total farmland in Canada. By 1996, they accounted for only 20%.
The number
of small farms decreased by 5.6% since 1991. Saskatchewan's loss was greatest:
21% of its small farms disappeared between 1991 and 1996 (Figure 2).
[D] Click for larger version, 9 KB Figure 2. In Most Provinces, More Small Farms Lost Money in 1996 than in 1991
Four provinces actually bucked the trend and increased their small farm numbers:
Newfoundland and Labrador by 5.6%, New Brunswick by 9.3%, British
Columbia by 14%, and Nova Scotia by 18%.
In British Columbia, more
farmers are selling their produce to farmers' markets or direct to customers.
As for consumers, their interest in alternative commodities- products typically
of interest to new farmers on small farms-continues to grow.
Including Christmas tree
farms in the 1996 Census of Agriculture accounts for much of Nova Scotia's and
New Brunswick's increase. Newfoundland has seen gains as farmers look for alternatives
to fishing to make a living.
Across Canada in 1996, 72%
of small farms reported field crops and 51% reported traditional livestock (such
as pigs, cattle, and poultry), the two most popular commodities on both small
and large farms.
Many Small Farms Specialized in Alternative Commodities
About 67% of census farms
reporting alternative commodities (for example, garlic, currants, and ostriches)
were small farms. Their small scale and flexibility gives them an advantage
in developing commodities for specialized or newly emerging markets. Four significant
alternative commodities differed from the rest: caraway, oriental vegetables,
ginseng, and deer and elk were reported mainly by large farms.
Small farms
figure greatly in their predilection for alternative commodities, but not in
their production (Figure 3 and 4). In terms of area, small farms accounted for
almost 70% of garlic and wild rice, and for about 50% of the alternative berries
(currants, blackberries and saskatoon berries). For animals, small farms accounted
for 81% of beefalo (a cross between beef cattle and buffalo), almost 70% of
emu and rhea, 60% of goats and approximately 50% of rabbits and llamas.
[D] Click for larger version, 13 KB Figure 3. For Many Commodities, Small Census Farms are the Frequent Farmers
[D] Click for larger version, 12 KB Figure 4. But Their Share is Small
Roughly three-quarters of small farms growing alternative commodities
reported a financial loss. Some may have been relatively new and still
developing their markets.
Despite the difficulties-non-profitable farms, working at another job
off the farm, and continually searching for new markets for alternative
agricultural produce-small-farm operators do persist. What helps keep
these people on the farm is an appreciation for the land and their rural
lifestyle.
DATA FOR THIS ARTICLE CAME FROM THE 1991 AND 1996 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE;
THE BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE (STATISTICS UNIT); THE NEWFOUNDLAND
DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES, FOOD AND AGRICULTURE; AND THE NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE AND MARKETING.
Data
and Mapping Notes provides information regarding the 1996 Census
data presented in the maps and references to mapping techniques
used.
|