This map shows male median
income for the male population 15 years of age and over reporting
income in 1995 (not including institutional residents). As with
other income maps in the Atlas, the data for this map are derived
from the 1996 Census. The interpretive
notes are primarily based on Statistics Canada sources.
The data were calculated as median values of individual income
in each of the 288 census
divisions (CD). A median value is the middle number in the total
range of a set of numbers that are ranked from lowest to highest.
The middle value is the median, which corresponds to the 50th percentile.
The map legend includes the national median value as a class limit;
all CD values are ranked
as either above or below the national median. Income statistics
are often represented as average values, however, median income
values were used for these maps, as they were considered more representative
of actual income distributions. Averages tend to be skewed by extreme
high values while medians better reflect the total number of values
for each CD. Note that
data are only shown on the map for the settled
areas within each CD.
For definitions of income concepts and terminology, refer to 1996
Census Dictionary.
The notes below briefly explain the geographical patterns and associated
income distributions.
Components of Income (1996 Census)
The 1996 Census Dictionary defines income sources to include
- wages and salaries
- farm and non-farm self-employment
- government transfer payments
- investment income
- retirement income, and
- other money income
The chart below shows the relationship of these major income sources:
[D] Click for larger version, 35 KB Figure 1. Components of Income, 1995
Income Distributions: An Overview
The income distribution on the map reflects the socio-economic
dynamic between urban and rural areas right across Canada. Incomes
of individuals and families living in rural Canada tend to be lower
than for urban areas. Within those same regions the overall distribution
of incomes appear "more equal" when compared to urban
centres. Differences in income distributions are also significant
within the urban areas of which the most populated regions coincide
with the geographic location of the 25 census
metropolitan areas (CMA). According to Statistics Canada, 1996
figures, nearly 80% of the total population lived in CMAs,
an area which represents less than 1% of the total landmass of Canada.
It is within these areas where the most complex patterns of income
distribution are observed. To better view the urban distributions,
use the zoom button and click on the map area of interest. To view
population figures and additional income statistics for each census
division, first click on the get statistics button and then click
on the map area.
According to the 1996 Census, close to 21 million individuals reported
income for 1995. The statistics indicate that the total income from
all sources reflected a 6% decrease when compared to 1990. After
adjustment for inflation, the average total income of individuals,
15 years of age and over, was $25 196. The national median income
for Canada was $18 891.
[D] Click for larger version, 5 KB Figure 2. Average Total Income of Individuals in Constant (1995) Dollars, Canada, 1980, 1985, 1990 and 1995
For current economic statistics published monthly by Industry Canada,
visit:
Geographical Patterns: Male Median Income, 1995
Based on the 1996 Census, the average income of men was $31 117,
a decrease of 7.8% from the 1991 Census. The national male median
income shown on this map is $25 270. Between 1985 and 1990, men
were able to recover income losses as a result of the recession
of the early 1980s, however their average income in 1995 was still
7.6% below what it was in 1980.
This map presents a similar income distribution as for the map
showing Median Income of Individuals, 1995. Both male and female
income patterns are also closely tied to urban and rural settlement
patterns. Overall, the distribution of incomes above the national
male median of $25 270 were most prominent in the largest urban
centres including Victoria, Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Toronto,
Ottawa-Hull and Montreal. A gradual decline of economic influence
was reflected in the lower incomes for the regions surrounding the
urban cores.
A number of rural and northern census divisions accounted for incomes
well above the male national median. These included Prince George
in the Fraser Fort-George Regional District and the Peace River
Regional District of British Columbia; the Manicouagan, and Sept-Rivières-Caniapiscau
regions of Quebec; and the Fort Smith Region of Northwest Territories.
In the case of the latter, the high incomes are partly attributed
to the higher wages as a result of employment incentives such as
living and wage supplements to compensate for the higher costs of
living. Regions such as Prince George offer both men and women with
broader employment opportunities owing to a more diverse economy
delivering important regional services. The occupations available
are in management, business, finance, administration and government
services, which tend to be associated with higher incomes.
To a large extent, the weaker economic influence of the peripheral
agricultural regions throughout the Prairie Provinces is reflected
in the low incomes reported, particularly in the more remote communities
of Northern Saskatchewan. Similarly, the higher concentration of
low income males in Newfoundland and the Atlantic Provinces is largely
attributed to the decline of the fisheries industry and to seasonal
employment.
What is unique to the male income data are the overall high median
income values when compared to both the Median Income of Individuals
and Female Median Income maps. The highest median income range of
$32 000 to $45 239 represents incomes well above the national median
for all individuals at $18 891 and the female national median of
$14 508.
To properly interpret this map, please consult the text Data
and Mapping Notes. |