Natural Resources Canada logo and Government of Canada logo
Read about the Atlas of Canada's Web Accessibility Features. Skip all menus Skip first Menu
 Français  Contact Us  Help  Search  Canada Site
 Home  Site Map  About Us  Partners  NRCan Site
The Atlas of Canada - Identifier
Search Our Site
Explore Our Maps
Environment
People & Society
Economy
History
Climate Change
Freshwater
Health
Reference Maps
Map Archives
Learning Resources
Lesson Plans
Facts about Canada
All Resources
Data & Services
Wall Maps
Free Data
Web Services
Discover Canada through National Maps and Facts Satellite image of Canada

Growth Rates of the Service Industries, 1986 to 1996

View this map

 

Abstract

The maps of growth rates for the period 1986 to 1996 tell us how many jobs each city has added relative to its size, so that cities can be compared. Those cities that have special advantages for service activity will be the places that grow in the future. The difference in the employment totals (1996 value minus 1986 value) is called the absolute growth; and the absolute growth divided by the 1986 value is called the growth rate (absolute growth / 1986 value). Almost all places with a growth rate of more than 40% in total service employment over the decade are located in Alberta, British Columbia or within 200 kilometres of Toronto or Montréal. Saskatchewan and Manitoba do very poorly, and the Atlantic provinces and other parts of Ontario and Quebec display a variety of growth rates, some being high but most low.

The growth rate between 1986 and 1996 for all services, commercial (private) and public, ranged from 125% (Varennes, Quebec) to -9.1% (Elliot Lake, Ontario).

Geographical Description

On this map, the circles indicate the population for 1996, while the colours in the legend indicate the rates of growth, either positive or negative. The rates suggest that growth was widely dispersed across the country, with the exception of Saskatchewan and Manitoba. The highest rates of growth occurred in British Columbia, Alberta and in or near Toronto, Ottawa and Montréal. Of course, these are some of the places with the highest per capita incomes. Cities in the Atlantic provinces show some growth, but less than those in Ontario and Quebec.

Most cities and rural areas close to Montréal showed very low rates of growth. Halifax and Moncton, New Brunswick stand out in the Atlantic provinces. Montréal and Québec contrast with the smaller cities in Quebec. In general, the growth of service employment was much slower in rural areas. In Ontario, growth was higher for rural areas closer to Toronto. The high growth rates around Toronto extend for 100 kilometres or more. Most population centres around Vancouver and on Vancouver Island had similar high growth rates.

To properly interpret this map, please consult the text Data and Mapping Notes.

Other Maps in this Series:

Read More About:

 
Date modified: 2004-03-16 Top of Page Important Notices