TRANSCENDING BARRIERS
25th ANNIVERSARY OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER OF OFFENDERS PRORAM
Remarks by:
Lucie McClung
Commissioner of the Correctional Service of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
May 23, 2003
Check against delivery
Good morning Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished guests. On behalf of the Solicitor
General of Canada, Mr. Wayne Easter, who unfortunately could not be among us
today, I would like to extend to you a heartlfelt welcome to this conference.
I am pleased to be here to celebrate with you the 25th Anniversary of the International
Transfer of Offenders Program. Today's conference is about Transcending Borders
-- about recognizing international collaboration between countries on criminal
justice issues. It also offers us an opportunity to recognize those individuals
who made the International Transfer of Offenders Program possible.
Over 25 years ago, someone had a vision and took steps to shape it into a reality.
In 1975, Mr. William Outerbridge, the then Chair of the National Parole Board
of Canada was preoccupied about people being incarcerated in foreign countries,
away from their families. He saw the need for agreements between Canada and
other countries for the transfer of these individual offenders. At the 5th United
Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and Treatment of Offenders in Geneva,
William Outerbridge put forward an initiative suggesting that countries enter
into agreements for the purpose of facilitating the transfer of offenders. He
did this largely in recognition of community support as a vital factor in crime
prevention. The Canadian intervention was favorably received and gave rise to
discussions on the subject with representatives of several countries.
The work of William Outerbridge coupled with that of Jack Hollies of the Department
of the Solicitor General, and John Hadwen of Foreign Affairs led to a model
treaty that reflected the guidelines and principles for the international transfer
of offenders.
The model treaty later served as a basis for eleven bilateral treaties signed
between Canada and other countries and three multilateral conventions namely,
the Council of Europe’s Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (1983),
the Scheme for the Transfer of Convicted Offenders within the Commonwealth (1990)
and the Inter-American Convention on Serving Criminal Sentences Abroad (1993).
Since the inception of the transfer program over 25 years ago, many government
officials, public servants and individuals involved in criminal justice matters
have been instrumental in providing the necessary support and I would be remiss
if I was not to underline their contribution and involvement over the years.
As indicated by M. François Patry, the International Transfer of Offenders
Program and the related treaties serve an important humanitarian purpose. A
person incarcerated in a country with an unfamiliar language and culture often
encounters many difficulties and suffers from a lack of contact with family
and friends. Hardships they face often translate into hardships for their families
as well.
But beyond personal hardships - which are not insignificant in and of themselves
- the program serves an important policy purpose. Indeed, the program directly
supports the goal of criminal justice systems worldwide; that is to foster safe
communities. It provides offenders incarcerated in foreign states with the opportunity
to go home and take part in rehabilitation programs that are relevant to him
or her as an individual, as well as being relevant to their home community.
As a result, the chances of successful reintegration of these individuals within
their own communities are greatly increased.
The program also ensures that offenders do not escape justice. When offenders
are transferred to their country of origin to serve the remainder of their sentence,
they fall under the authority of the receiving country. They continue to assume
the responsibility of their criminal actions as well as their ability of enhancing
their capacity in becoming law-abiding citizens. In other words, they work towards
safe release in terms that their home communities adhere to.
As M. Patry touched upon, citizens worldwide have gained a deeper appreciation
of the need to work cooperatively on matters of criminal justice since September
11, 2001. Citizens are indeed preoccupied with their personal safety and the
well-being of their community and fully understand the implication of globalization
as devastating events unfold before their eyes. Today, citizens and criminal
justice partners are called upon to not only respond to the aftermath of crime
but also to the prevention of crime. By cooperating in matters of offender transfers,
states protect their sovereignty by preventing offenders from escaping justice
and offer platforms to offenders for becoming law-abiding citizens.
International Transfer of Offenders Program and related treaties and conventions
have proven to be successful and continue to be a permanent feature of international
relations between our country and many others. The progress made in Canada since
1978 in this area is considerable. Approximately 1,000 Canadians have been brought
to Canada and more than 100 foreign offenders have been returned to their country
of citizenship. The numbers may seem small for one country, but worldwide, thousands
more have been returned to their home countries, thanks to bilateral treaties
and international conventions.
In Canada, the Solicitor General recently tabled in the House of Commons amendments
that will further the public safety and humanitarian purposes of the transfer
of offenders. The new legislation will also allow Canada to enter into transfer
agreements with other non-sovereign states.
Today, we will hear more about the transfer program and its impact. And we
will hear first hand personal accounts of the impact of the program.
In closing , let me suggest to you that the program has demonstrated its impact
of serving the interest of criminal justice systems worldwide.
Thank you very much. I wish us all a productive conference.
|