| |
Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2005-14
|
| |
See also: 2005-14-1
Ottawa, 16 September 2005 |
| |
Implementation of wireless number portability
|
| |
Reference: 8620-C12-200510934 |
| |
In this Public Notice, the Commission invites
comments on several issues related to the implementation of wireless number
portability between wireless carriers and between those carriers and wireline
local exchange carriers. |
| |
Background
|
|
1. |
The Commission's three-year work plans, issued
in 2004 and 2005, indicated that the issue of wireless number portability
would be considered during the 2005-2006 fiscal year. In a letter dated 18
March 2005, the Minister of Industry informed the Commission that the Budget
Plan tabled in Parliament on 23 February 2005, made reference, among other
things, to the Government of Canada's intention to request the Commission to
move expeditiously to implement wireless number portability. The Minister
noted that consideration of wireless portability was included in the
Commission's three-year work plan, and was therefore confident that the
Commission would deal with this matter in an expeditious manner. The Minister
indicated that the Government of Canada understood that wireless number
portability included wireless-to-wireless, wireline-to-wireless and
wireless-to-wireline number portability. |
|
2. |
On 21 April 2005, the Canadian Wireless
Telecommunications Association (CWTA) announced that Canada's wireless
carriers had agreed to implement number portability. To that end, the CWTA
engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, to conduct an independent review and
provide an implementation plan that could be used by the wireless industry to
implement wireless number portability. Representatives from Industry Canada
and the Commission participated as observers in the development of the
implementation plan. The implementation report, entitled Implementation of
Wireless Number Portability: Setting a New World-Class Standard, was
presented by the CWTA to the Commission for information on 12 September 2005.
The CWTA advised the Commission in its covering letter to the implementation
report that it supports the conclusions arrived at by PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP. |
| |
Regulatory framework
|
|
3. |
In Implementation of regulatory framework –
Local number portability and related issues, Telecom Public Notice CRTC
95-48, 10 November 1995, the Commission
established a working group of interested parties to examine the technical,
administrative and certain regulatory issues associated with the introduction
of local number portability. On 14 June 1996, the Commission received a
number of reports from various sub-committees of the working group. By letter
dated 19 July 1996, the Commission adopted a number of the recommendations
reached by consensus among the participants. In that letter, the Commission
also invited comments on five issues, including location portability, for
which consensus had not been reached. |
|
4. |
On 25 October 1996, the Commission issued a
letter setting out its determinations on these five issues. The Commission
determined, among other things, that location portability should only be
permitted as long as the new location of the telephone number remained within
the boundaries of the original telephone company's telephone exchange or
rate centre. |
|
5. |
In Telecom Order CRTC
99-5, 8 January 1999 (Order
99-5), the Commission determined
that local number portability should be limited to local exchange carriers
(LECs), for two reasons: one related to number portability in particular, and
the other to local exchange competition in general. In regard to number
portability in particular, the Commission noted that for the purposes of
rating calls and determining contribution payments based on traffic volumes,
service providers are required to use a unique set of NXXs in each telephone
exchange in which they operate. The Commission noted that permitting a
non-LEC to access telephone number portability systems could result in the
provision of local number portability by a service provider that does not
have a unique set of NXXs, and therefore, does not meet the essential
requirements of the framework established for local exchange competition.
|
|
6. |
Secondly, the Commission noted that the
framework for local exchange competition set out obligations and privileges
for competitive LECs (CLECs), and that extending the privilege of access to
local number portability by non-LECs would alter the balance of those
privileges and obligations. |
| |
Scope of the proceeding
|
|
7. |
In this proceeding, the Commission invites
comment on modifying the current regulatory regime so that wireless carriers
can directly port telephone numbers. The Commission notes that this ability
may require the telecommunications industry to modify, inter alia, its
number porting and customer transfer processes. The Commission considers that
dealing expeditiously with the issues set out in this Public Notice will
permit wireless number portability to be implemented at the earliest possible
date. |
|
8. |
The Commission will consider the following four
issues in this proceeding: |
| |
(a) how wireless carriers may gain direct access
to number portability systems,1
and the terms and conditions that should apply; |
| |
(b) what the appropriate service interval should
be to port a telephone number to and/or from a wireless carrier; |
| |
(c) what the eligible porting scenarios should
be to port a telephone number to and/or from a wireless carrier; and |
| |
(d) wireless number portability implementation
time frames. |
|
9. |
The Commission notes that it intends to issue a
further public notice once it has reviewed the CWTA implementation plan in
detail. The scope of the further proceeding could include such matters as:
|
| |
- Wireless services subject to number porting
|
| |
- The interchange of traffic between wireless carriers and LECs in a
portability environment
|
| |
- Wireless carrier access to incumbent LEC (ILEC) operational support
systems
|
| |
- Criteria for denying a wireless port
|
| |
- ILEC winback rules for wireless number ports
|
| |
- Directory listings and information provided for E-911 calls
|
| |
- Any other matters that may arise from a review of the implementation
report
|
| |
Access by wireless carriers to number portability systems
|
|
10. |
As noted above, in Order
99-5 the Commission limited access
to local number portability systems to LECs. Since that decision, several
circumstances have changed. One of the factors in the Commission's decision
was the uncertainty that non-LECs could provide traffic routing in a manner
that supported a traffic volume-based contribution regime. However, the
Commission notes that contribution payments are now based on
telecommunications-related revenue rather than traffic volumes and related
call rating principles. Additionally, since Order
99-5 was issued, competition in the
local exchange service market has evolved with the introduction of new
serving technologies that are not provisioned in the same boundaries as the
ILECs' local exchange areas. |
|
11. |
The Commission considers that subscribers'
ability to retain their current telephone numbers is a key element in
minimizing service disruption. In the Commission's view, consumers should be
given the widest possible choice of competing suppliers to meet their needs,
and there should be minimal disruption in service when changing suppliers.
The Commission, therefore, invites comment on (a) whether to permit wireless
carriers to directly access local number portability systems, and (b) whether
the terms and conditions for access to local number portability systems by
existing LECs should be extended to wireless carriers, with or without
modification. |
| |
The appropriate service interval to port a telephone number to and/or
from a wireless carrier
|
|
12. |
In Incumbent local exchange carrier service
intervals for various competitor services, Telecom Decision CRTC
2003-48, 18 July 2003
(Decision 2003-48), the
Commission determined that the service interval for the provision of
stand-alone ports should be two business days. The Commission invites comment
on whether this interval is appropriate for porting numbers to and/or from
wireless carriers. Parties proposing shorter porting intervals should comment
on how any resulting additional costs should be defrayed. |
| |
Eligible porting scenarios involving wireless carriers
|
|
13. |
The Commission notes that due to the nature of
wireless networks, service coverage areas are unlikely to be coterminous with
telephone exchange boundaries. Further, wireless service customers do not
receive service at a single geographic point, in that they can make and
receive calls from any location they can receive a network signal.2 |
|
14. |
The Commission further notes that wireless
carriers use North American Numbering Plan (NANP) geographic-based numbers
that are associated with a specific rate centre that uniquely identifies and
locates a telephone exchange. With NANP geographic numbers, all calls to a
number associated with a rate centre are deemed to have originated or
terminated at that rate centre. This rating principle also applies to all
calls to wireless numbers.3 |
|
15. |
The Commission notes, however, that call routing
between service providers is not subject to this same principle or
restriction, in that it is not necessary for the interchange of traffic
between service providers or carriers to occur within the telephone exchange
associated with a rate centre. For example, the interchange of traffic can
occur at points of interconnection that aggregate traffic for multiple
exchanges.4 |
|
16. |
The Commission is of the view that these
differences between wireline-based networks and wireless networks create
three different number porting scenarios, namely: wireless-to-wireless,
wireline-to-wireless, and wireless-to-wireline. The Commission is of the view
that it is necessary to determine what constitutes an eligible number port
for each of these scenarios. Thus, the Commission invites comment on eligible
ports for each of the following scenarios : |
| |
- wireless-to-wireless ports: the porting of telephone numbers
between wireless carriers is permitted regardless of a subscriber's
physical location or billing address, as long as the ported telephone
number maintains its original telephone exchange/rate centre designation
for rating purposes.
|
| |
- Wireline-to-wireless ports: the porting of telephone numbers
between wireline-based carriers5
and wireless carriers is permitted as long as the telephone number
maintains its original telephone exchange/rate centre designation for
rating purposes.
|
| |
- Wireless-to-wireline ports: the porting of telephone numbers
between wireless carriers and wireline-based carriers may be limited by the
ability of a wireline-based network to provide service to a former wireless
service customer when that customer's physical service location is located
outside the telephone exchange area/rate centre associated with the
telephone number to be ported. Therefore, it will be at the option of the
wireline-based carrier to accept or deny porting of telephone numbers from
wireless carriers when a customer's location is outside the telephone
exchange area/rate centre associated with a ported telephone number.
|
|
|
Time frame for introducing wireless number portability
|
|
17. |
In its covering letter of 12 September 2005, the
CWTA indicated that it supported the conclusions of the report and plans to
deploy wireless number portability by 12 September 2007. This date would see
wireless number portability being launched in all locations where local
number portability currently exists, plus Regina and Saskatoon. For all other
locations where local number portability does not exist, wireless number
portability would be introduced within Commission-approved notification
periods upon wireless carrier notification to the ILEC. |
|
18. |
The Commission invites comments on CWTA's plan
as it relates to the time frame for deploying wireless number portability, or
comments on any other proposals, such as a phased approach, that could
shorten the deployment time frame. |
| |
Procedure
|
|
19. |
Aliant Mobility, Bell Mobility, MTS Mobility,
Rogers Wireless, Sasktel Mobility, TELUS Mobility, Bell Canada, MTS Allstream
Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications, TELUS Communications Inc., Aliant
Telecom Inc., Cogeco Cable Canada Inc., EastLink, ISP Telecom Inc., Exatel
Inc., Vidéotron Télécom ltée, Globility Communications Corporation, FCS
Broadband, Rogers Cable Communications Inc., and Maskatel Inc. are all made
parties to this proceeding. |
|
20. |
Other parties wishing to participate in
this proceeding are required to notify the Commission of their
intention to do so by 26 September 2005 (the registration
date) and to provide their contact information. They are required
to do so by contacting the Secretary General by mail at CRTC,
Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0N2, by fax at (819) 994-0218 or by e-mail at
procedure@crtc.gc.ca. They
are to indicate in the notice their e-mail address where available.
If such parties do not have access to the Internet, they are
to indicate in their notice whether they wish to receive disk versions
of hard copy filings. |
|
21. |
The Commission will issue, as soon as possible
after the registration date, a complete list of parties and their mailing
address (including their e-mail address, if available), identifying those
parties who wish to receive disk versions. |
|
22. |
All parties may file comments with the
Commission on any matter within the scope of this proceeding by 6
October 2005, serving a copy on all parties by that date. |
|
23. |
All parties may file replies to any comments
made pursuant to paragraph 22 by 17 October 2005, serving a copy on
all parties by that date. |
|
24. |
The Commission will not formally acknowledge
comments. It will, however, fully consider all comments and they will form
part of the public record of the proceeding. |
|
25. |
Where a document is to be filed or served by a
specific date, the document must be actually received, not merely sent, by
that date. |
|
26. |
Parties can file their submissions
electronically or on paper. Submissions longer than five pages should include
a summary. |
|
27. |
Each paragraph of your submission should be
numbered. |
|
28. |
Where the submission is filed by electronic
means, the line ***End of document*** should be entered following the last
paragraph, as an indication that the document has not been damaged during
electronic transmission. |
|
29. |
Please note that only those submissions
electronically filed will be available on the Commission's web site and only
in the official language and format in which they are submitted. |
|
30. |
The Commission encourages interested parties to
monitor the public examination file (and/or the Commission's web site) for
additional information that they may find useful when preparing their
submissions. |
| |
Important
|
|
31. |
All information submitted including your email
address, name and any other personal information as provided, will be posted
on the Commission's web site. Documents received in electronic format will be
posted on the Commission's web site exactly as you send them, and in the
official language and format in which they are received. Documents not
received electronically will be available in .pdf format. |
| |
Location of CRTC offices
|
|
32. |
Submissions may be examined or will be made
available promptly upon request at the Commission offices during normal
business hours: |
| |
Central Building
Les Terrasses de la Chaudière
1 Promenade du Portage, Room 206
Gatineau, Quebec J8X 4B1
Tel: (819) 997-2429 - TDD: 994-0423
Fax: (819) 994-0218 |
| |
Metropolitan Place
99 Wyse Road, Suite 1410
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B3A 4S5
Tel: (902) 426-7997 - TDD: 426-6997
Fax: (902) 426-2721 |
| |
205 Viger Avenue West, Suite 504
Montréal, Quebec H2Z 1G2
Tel: (514) 283-6607 |
| |
55 St. Clair Avenue East, Suite 624
Toronto, Ontario M4T 1M2
Tel: (416) 952-9096 |
| |
Kensington Building
275 Portage Avenue, Suite 1810
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2B3
Tel: (204) 983-6306 - TDD: 983-8274
Fax: (204) 983-6317 |
| |
Cornwall Professional Building
2125 - 11th Avenue, Suite 103
Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3X3
Tel: (306) 780-3422 |
| |
10405 Jasper Avenue, Suite 520
Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N4
Tel: (780) 495-3224 |
| |
580 Hornby Street, Suite 530
Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3B6
Tel: (604) 666-2111 - TDD: 666-0778
Fax: (604) 666-8322 |
| |
Secretary General |
| |
This document is available in alternative
format upon request, and may also be examined in PDF
format or in HTML at the following Internet site:
http://www.crtc.gc.ca |
