RSV 2010 - 2002 Annual Report
TP 13347 E
|
![Skip all menus (access key: 2)](/web/20060212055454im_/http://www.tc.gc.ca/images/18px.gif) |
![Canada and the World](/web/20060212055454im_/http://www.tc.gc.ca/roadsafety/vision/2002/images/world.jpg)
International Comparisons
Canada’s inaugural national road safety plan was successful, as indicated by the lower death and serious injury tolls. However, a review of the
top-ranked countries in this field shows that they, too, were making considerable progress.
In 2001, Canada ranked fifth among member
countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) based on fatalities per billion vehicle kilometres travelled.
Ahead of Canada were Great Britain, Sweden, the Netherlands and Norway. In fact, similar comparisons of fatality rates during 1996 show
that all of the world’s safest countries made steady progress during the time frame of Road Safety Vision 2001. |
|
In 2001,
Canada's fatality rate was the fifth best among OECD member
countries.
|
|
It became evident that Canada would need more than a vision to achieve its goal of having the world’s safest roads. An examination of the key
elements of road safety programs among the top-ranked OECD countries (Table
1) revealed that most of them had set ambitious quantitative
road safety targets.
To achieve these targets, the OECD’s safest nations are continuing to develop innovative initiatives.
Great Britain has
set up a year-round road safety public awareness campaign called THINK, which focuses on child safety, vulnerable road
users, drinking and driving, seat belts, teenagers and speed reductions, among other issues. The most useful aspect
of the THINK campaign is that it raises awareness of many road safety issues together under one umbrella to maximize
the impact of the overall road safety message.
Sweden’s long-term goal – called Vision Zero – is that no one be killed or seriously
injured in road traffic crashes. Sweden’s current action plan focuses on special safety
measures for the most dangerous roads and safer traffic movement in built-up areas, emphasizing road
user responsibility, safer cycling conditions and compulsory use of studded winter tires. It places
greater responsibility on road traffic system designers
and includes the development of alternative forms of financing for new roads.
The Netherlands has embraced a coordinated approach to road safety to achieve its specific
objectives. The Dutch plan involves greater sharing of costs and responsibilities among
the national, provincial and municipal governments as well as the private sector.
National targets have been broken down into regional targets. Specific activities cited
for these coordinated efforts include modifying all road user behaviour, improving road and motorway infrastructure,
improving driver training, enhancing police enforcement and
reinforcing the “safety culture.”
Like Sweden, Norway has embraced the Vision Zero concept. The Norwegian plan targets safer roads through
removal of roadside hazards, improved curves, rumble
strips on centre lines, improved winter operations (by, for example, enhancing signposting and providing up-to-the-minute
information on road conditions) and increased
road safety audits. Norway is also targeting measures to regulate driver behaviour, such as reducing speed
limits on the most dangerous roads, banning the use of hand-held cell phones while driving, imposing a
BAC limit of 20 mg% and increasing the demerit
points for driving offences; enforcement through more inspections of commercial vehicles, increased
emphasis on seat belt use, drinking and driving and speeding, and the use of automatic speed controls;
improved traffic education through compulsory
training for novice drivers, better training for currently licensed drivers, compulsory first aid training
and improved motorcyclist training; and a greater emphasis on knowledge building through research
and analysis.
Finland has made hand-held cell phone use illegal while driving, is introducing legislation
that will require all cyclists to use safety helmets and is extensively promoting the
use of reflective clothing by pedestrians after nightfall.
Australia hopes to achieve its target by continuing to focus on proven measures such as reducing the
incidence of drinking and driving, improving compliance with speed limits, and increasing seat belt
and child restraint use. More recent measures include matching speed limits to road conditions, promoting driver fatigue management, and
encouraging the use of in-vehicle intelligent transportation systems.
All of the OECD’s safest countries have ambitious long-term
road safety targets.
|
Denmark has focused on road engineering initiatives to achieve its targets. It has undertaken a systematic identification and elimination of
grey and black spots on its roadways, subjected all new road construction to safety audits, pilot tested road safety audits on some of its roads,
introduced public education campaigns and improved signage for road construction zones.
The United States is focusing considerable enforcement efforts on increasing seat belt use and decreasing drinking and driving. Four additional
problem areas were identified as major contributors to fatalities: single vehicles that run off the road, high speeds, problem intersections,
and crashes involving pedestrians and cyclists. Numerous road user and traffic engineering countermeasures have been introduced to help curtail
these problems.
Road safety measures in Switzerland have focused on increasing seat belt use and helmet wearing, traffic calming
(using roundabouts), improving police enforcement and
enhancing public education and crash prevention campaigns. Impending legislation will reduce the legal BAC
limit to 50 mg%, introduce more stringent penalties for repeat offenders and enable police to administer breath
tests without prior cause. Switzerland has also adopted a long-term Vision Zero concept.
Although Germany does not have national road safety targets, it has carried out road safety campaigns in
recent years that have enabled it to remain among the safest countries in the world. Major intervention
efforts have focused on drinking and driving, young drivers, motorcyclists and rural road crashes.
Table 1
Road Safety Targets • Selected OECD Countries
|
COUNTRY |
NATIONAL TARGETS |
Great Britain |
A 40% reduction in the number of people killed or seriously injured in traffic collisions by 2010, and a
50% reduction for children (<=16 years). |
Sweden |
A 50% decrease in the number of road users killed in 2007 compared with 1996. |
The Netherlands |
30% fewer road deaths and 25% fewer injuries requiring hospital care in 2010 compared with
comparable 1998 totals. |
Norway |
200 or fewer road user fatalities by 2012 (2001 total = 275). |
Canada |
A 30% decrease in the average number of road users killed or seriously injured during 2008-2010 compared
with average figures during 1996-2001. |
Finland |
250 or fewer traffic fatalities by 2010 (2001 total = 433). |
Australia |
A 40% decrease in the number of road user fatalities per 10,000 inhabitants by 2010 compared
with the 1999 rate. |
Denmark |
A 40% reduction in the number of road users killed or seriously injured by 2012 compared with 1998 totals. |
United States |
A 20% reduction in total road user fatalities and injuries by 2008 compared with 2000 figures and
a 50% reduction in commercial vehicle related deaths and injuries by 2010. |
Switzerland |
300 or fewer road user fatalities by 2010 and a maximum of 4 fatalities/100,000 inhabitants
(2001 figures = 544 fatalities and 7.44 fatalities/100,000 inhabitants). |
Germany |
None. |
What does all of this international activity to improve road safety mean for Canada? Clearly, if we are
going to achieve our goal of having the safest roads in the world, we must redouble our efforts.
|
With ongoing road safety improvements by the world’s other safest nations, we
must redouble our efforts to achieve our goal of having the safest roads in the world.
|
|
|