Alternate Format(s)
|
|
Classification Standard - BI - Biological Sciences
CONTENTS
|
|
INTRODUCTION
|
CATEGORY DEFINITION
|
GROUP DEFINITION
|
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
|
FACTORS AND FACTOR CHARACTERISTICS
|
DEFINITIONS OF FACTORS AND FACTOR CHARACTERISTICS,
DEGREES, AND NOTES TO RATERS
|
POSITION LEVELS: TYPICAL DISTINGUISHING FEATURES
|
LIST OF BENCH-MARK POSITIONS
|
BENCH-MARK POSITIONS: RATING SUMMARY
|
BENCH-MARK POSITIONS: DESCRIPTIONS, SPECIFICATIONS
AND RATINGS
|
INTRODUCTION
This standard describes the plan to be used to classify
positions allocated to the Biological Sciences Group. It consists
of an introduction, definitions of the Scientific and
Professional Category and the occupational group, a glossary of
terms, factor definitions, characteristics and degree highlights,
and bench-mark position descriptions.
The ultimate objective of job evaluation is
the determination of the relative values of jobs in each
occupational group. A classification plan of five levels,
representing significant differences in the difficulty of the
work, has been established for this group. Jobs assigned to a
given level are regarded as being of equal difficulty.
Factors
The evaluation of positions and their
assignment to a classification level will be determined by the
application of five factors:
Kind of Assignments
Complexity of Work Professional Responsibility Management
Responsibility
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
Each factor is described, and the descriptions
designate the features of the work assigned to positions
allocated to the group.
Factor Characteristics
The factor characteristics are shown under
each factor. The characteristics indicate the features of the
work that are to be considered when evaluating a position under a
particular factor.
Highlights which describe and distinguish the
increasing difficulty of the work from the lowest to the highest
degree, are provided for the five degrees of each factor
characteristics. These highlights describe the features of the
work that will be found in most positions.
Bench-mark Positions
Bench-mark positions exemplify the degrees of
the characteristics, the degrees of each factor and the levels of
the classification plan. Each bench-mark consists of a
descriptive title, a series of statements of the principal
duties, and a set of specifications describing the features of
the work of the position in terms of the characteristics of each
of the five factors. The specifications exemplify the application
of the evaluation plan to the duties and responsibilities of the
bench-mark position and substantiate the degree assigned to the
position for the characteristics and the factors. A
classification level is assigned to each bench-mark position.
Use of the Standard
There are six steps in the application of this
classification standard.
1.
|
The position description is studied to ensure understanding of
the position as a whole and of the nature of the duties and
responsibilities as they relate to the characteristics of each
factor. The relationship of the position being studied to
positions above and below it in the organization is also
studied.
|
- Allocation of the position to the category and group is
confirmed by reference to the definitions and the descriptions of
inclusions and exclusions.
|
|
- A degree under each of the factor characteristics is
tentatively assigned to the position being evaluated, by
considering the duties and responsibilities of the position in
relation to the degrees described for the factor characteristics,
and attributing to the position the degree whose definition best
reflects the conditions that are typical of the work of the
position and most closely corresponds to its difficulty in terms
of the characteristic. The degree tentatively assigned is
confirmed by comparison with the bench-mark position descriptions
and rating specifications for the characteristic.
|
|
- A degree under each factor is assigned to the position. The
degree to be assigned for a factor is determined by the degree
which predominates for the factor's characteristics. When one
degree does not predominate, the raters are to compare the
overall intensity of the requirements of the position with
respect to the various characteristics of the factor with the
bench-mark positions, and attribute to the position the factor
degree that best equates, on the whole, to the bench-mark
positions.
|
|
- The level of the position is determined by the degree that
has been assigned to the position for at least three of the five
factors. When one degree does not predominate, raters are to
compare the total job with the bench-mark positions and determine
the level that best corresponds, on the whole, with the duties
and responsibilities of the position.
|
|
- The position is compared with bench-mark positions that have
been assigned to the same level, as a check on the validity of
the level selected.
|
Guide
A Guide identifying a series of distinguishing features
characterizing positions found typical of each level is included
in the standard.
CATEGORY DEFINITION
Occupational categories were repealed by the Public Service Reform Act (PSRA), effective April 1, 1993. Therefore, the occupational category definitions have been deleted from the classification standards.
GROUP DEFINITION
For occupational group allocation, it is recommended that you use the Occupational Group Definition and the
Occupational Sub-group Definition Maps, which provide the
2005 group and sub-group definition and their corresponding inclusion and exclusion statements. The maps explicitly link the relevant parts of the overall
2005 occupational sub-group definition to each classification standard.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
For the purpose of this standard -
Biological Sciences - Refers to the
sciences which deal with the origin, physical characteristics,
life processes and behavior of plants and animals. It includes
botany, zoology, microbiology and their related fields such as
ecology, entomology, cytology and genetics. - It also includes
the application of the principles of biology to chemical,
physical and geological systems.
Biological Analysis - Refers to the
qualitative or quantitative examination of biological matter or
organisms to determine their nature, number, proportion, function
or relationships.
Bioassay- Refers to the use of living
organisms to identify or quantify the biological effect of some
substance, factor or condition.
Biological Resources - Refers to populations of plant
and animal species in a natural environment or in captivity.
Biological Resources (Management
of) - Refers to the process of controlled consumption or
conservation of biological populations.
Biological Systems - Refers to living organisms and
their vital processes.
ConflictingInterests - Refers to
different opinions or points of view that lead to a confrontation
between individuals or organizations in respect of the
advantageous or detrimental results of a contemplated
action.
Continuing Operation - Refers to tasks
or investigations, usually of an ongoing nature or occurring in a
pattern or in repetitive cycles.
Contracts/Agreements (Evaluating
of)- Refers to the critical examination of
contract/agreement proposals or work done under contract for
scientific merit or quality and the provision of a
recommendation of acceptance with or without modifications
or rejection.
Ecology- Refers to a branch of biology
that deals with the relations between living organisms and their
environment.
Eco-Systems - Refers to a unit of biological
organization representing a community composed of its living
organisms interacting with their environment.
Implications of External Matters -
Refers to the difficulty added to the work because of the need to
recognize the interests of others, including those over whom
little effective influence can be exercised.
Organizationalcontrol - Refers to the control
over a staff and its work that is exercised through an
established organizational structure by means of which levels of
responsibility and authority are clearly identified.
N.B.: Some of the terms defined in this Glossary are not used in
this standard. However, the definitions of such terms can help
ensure consistency where their use may be indicated.
Organizational Unit - In terms
of size, refers to that which makes up or is understood to be
encompassed by "normal span of supervisory control of
professionals". - As illustrated by bench-mark positions, the
number of staff is normally a function of the nature/complexity,
conditions and requirements of the work, as well as of the type
of organizational structure applied.
Outside Assistance - Refers to
temporary assistance needed for the work and which must be
obtained from sources ranging from outside the immediate
organizational unit to organizations outside the Public
Service.
Policy - Refers to a declaration of
aims and intent established by legislation or ministerial
authority to guide future courses of action.
Program - Refers to the general plan
designed to achieve the objectives determined by a department or
agency to meet the aims and intent of policy.
Project - Refers to a unit of work for
which objectives have been defined and which is circumscribed by
budgetary controls, time limits and the availability of
resources.
Related Fields - Refers to general or
specialized fields that are pertinent to or associated with the
work of professionals in the biological sciences.
Significant Program Activity - Refers to
that portion of a scientific based program which is visible as an
entity and is comparable to work at the senior management level
but with emphasis on the scientific nature of the work.
Specialized Subject Area - Refers to a
"subject area" in which there is a narrowing of scope and the
work to be performed necessitates an enhanced development of
knowledge and experience.
Standards - Refers to:
(i) A recognized weight, measure or material of specified
composition or characteristics, or experimental procedure used as
a reference for uniform measurement, comparison or
calibration;
(ii) A set of recognized criteria (mandatory or voluntary)
specifying a minimum level of quality, purity, uniformity,
performance, or safety for the manufacture, use or handling of a
material, product, or device.
Studies - Refers to an in-depth
examination or investigation of an area of interest.
Subject Areas- Refers to the facts,
theories, ideas, techniques and related matters that are
encompassed by a study, investigation, project or program, and
include the application of one or more disciplines.
Supervisory responsibility - Refers to the
responsibility for scheduling and allocating work instructing,
training, controlling and assessing performance of other
employees and for ensuring satisfactory completion of their
work.
Survey - Refers to a general or broad examination of an
area of interest.
N.B.: Some of the terms defined in this Glossary are not used in
this standard. However, the definitions of such terms can help
ensure consistency where their use may be indicated.
FACTORS AND FACTOR CHARACTERISTICS
FACTOR
|
|
CHARACTERISTICS
|
FACTOR
|
|
CHARACTERISTICS
|
«KIND OF ASSIGNMENT»
|
a)
b)
c)
d)
|
Objectives establishing by
others for the work;
Extent of the work;
Variety of activities;
Scope for planning and
conducting work.
|
«MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY»
|
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
|
(Responsibility for:)
Control of staff;
Control of physical
resources;
Committing departmental
resources;
Obtaining outside
assistance;
Administrative control of
work;
Co-ordination of work
performed for, or in
conjunction with other
organizational units;
Implementing or developing
administrative procedures,
safety and management
directives and guidelines.
|
«COMPLEXITY OF WORK»
«PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY»
|
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
|
Availability and problems
involved in obtaining
information and data;
Validity of information and
data;
Number and variability of the
variables and ambiguity of
information and data;
Relationships of the
variables;
Effect of activities of others
on the work;
Nature and purpose of
contacts;
Development of concepts and
approaches, procedures,
techniques and practices,
their adaptation and
application;
Theoretical knowledge which
must be applied.
Extent work is checked by
others;
Professional guidance
received;
Initiative and judgment in
defining objectives, dealing
with problems and establishing
scientific guidelines;
Judgment in reviewing and
assessing work of others;
Judgment in interpreting
results of work;
Judgment in giving advice.
|
«IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATIONS
AND ACTIVITIES»
|
a)
b)
c)
|
(Impact - Governmental)
On departmental work or
other government program;
(Impact - External)
(i) On an industrial or
commercial process,
operation or product;
(ii) On the state of
natural resources or
the environment;
(iii) On public health and
safety;
(iv) On other external
areas.
On development and
understanding of a body of
knowledge.
|
FACTOR: "KIND OF ASSIGNMENT"
This factor is used to measure the difficulty of the work in
terms of its objectives and extent, the variety of activities and
the scope for planning and conducting work.
Notes to Raters
i) When evaluating a position under this factor, raters are to
consider the factor characteristics and their intensity ranging
from degree I to degree 5, and attribute to the position, for
each characteristic, the degree whose definition best reflects
the conditions that are typical of the work of the position and
most closely corresponds to the intensity of its requirements in
terms of the characteristic.
ii) For a same degree of intensity, all of the
characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
iii) The degree to be assigned to the position for the
whole factor, is determined by the degree which predominates
(i.e. the degree that has been assigned for at least three of the
four characteristics - "A', "B", "C" and "D"). When one degree
does not predominate, raters are to compare the overall intensity
of the requirements of the position under the factor with that of
the bench-mark positions, and determine and attribute to the
position the degree which best equates to the bench-mark
positions.
DEGREE 1
|
DEGREE 2
|
DEGREE 3
|
DEGREE 4
|
DEGREE 5
|
Characteristic A: The objectives
|
established by others for
|
the conduct of the work.
|
|
|
Objectives and
instructions are provided
for the work.
|
Objectives of the work are
clearly defined.
|
Objectives of the work are
defined in terms of
activity or project goals.
|
Objectives of the work are
stated in terms of
operational goals.
|
Objectives of the work are
stated in terms of goals
for a significant program
activity.
|
Characteristic B: The extent
|
of the work.
|
|
|
|
Work normally consists of
a part or phase of a
project, study or
continuing operation
requiring limited
investigation.
|
Work normally consists of
a number of discrete
projects, studies or
investigations.
|
Work involves
comprehensive investigations, projects or studies
within a specialized
subject area.
|
Work involves the
application of a number of
scientific principles and
theories to complex investigations or studies, within a
specialized subject
area; or the direction of
work in diverse subject
areas.
|
Work is performed within a
number of related specialized subject areas and
comprises a significant
program activity.
|
Characteristic C: The variety
|
of activities.
|
|
|
|
Activities closely
resemble one another in
most aspects and consist
of a limited number of
straight-forward tasks
performed successively.
|
Activities differ from one
another and consist of a
variety of tasks such as:
using a number of related
scientific techniques for
surveying, observing,
analyzing and evaluating
products, phenomena or
processes; investigating
the composition, performance or effect of
substances; allocating
work to support staff;
providing advice.
|
Activities differ from one
another and include using
a wide variety of scientific techniques for investigating the
composition,
performance or effect of
substances or systems; or
supervising the work of
staff engaged in the
conduct of analyses or
investigations; and
providing advice.
|
Activities differ from one
another in many aspects
and include several of the
following: conducting
complete investigations;
providing functional
direction; coordinating
the work with other activities; providing advice;
organizing, controlling
and supervising the work
of staff engaged in the
conduct of analyses or
investigations; controlling the use of facilities,
materiel and human
resources.
|
Activities involving a
broad spectrum of
scientific and administrative duties which differ
from one another in most
aspects and include:
evaluating and authorizing
projects or studies; making
recommendations or providing advice on policy or
legislation; assessing the
implications of work
progress on program objectives; providing guidance
on the determination of
approaches to complex
problems; and managing a
significant program
activity, or coordinating
activities at the national
and international levels.
|
Characteristic D: The scope
|
for planning and conducting work.
|
|
|
|
Scheduling and performing
work using standardized
procedures and techniques.
|
Planning activities,
determining approaches and
selecting methods to ensure
that the work meets clearly
defined objectives.
|
Planning and performing a
broad diversity of work
within a subject area, or
planning and assigning
tasks for the ongoing work
of an organizational unit,
or a project or study team
to ensure that the objectives are met within
established guidelines.
|
Planning, organizing and
delegating work of a
number of organizational
units, or planning and
coordinating complex
projects or studies to
ensure that operational
goals are achieved within
resources limitations; or
planning, organizing and
conducting complex
projects or studies within
a specialized area with
high degree of freedom and
latitude.
|
Planning, coordinating and
implementing a significant
program activity or major
scientific studies.
|
FACTOR: "COMPLEXITY OF WORK"
This factor is used to measure the difficulty of the work in
terms of the nature of the information and data used; the
influences external to the work; the nature and purpose of
contacts with others; the requirement for the development of
concepts and approaches, procedures, techniques. and practices,
their adaptation and application; and, the theoretical and
practical knowledge which must be applied.
Notes to Raters
(i) When evaluating positions under this factor, raters are to
consider the factor characteristics and their intensity ranging
from degree 1 to degree 5, and attribute to the position, for
each characteristic, the degree; whose definition best reflects
the conditions that are typical of the work of the position and
most closely corresponds to the intensity of its requirements in
terms of the characteristic.
(ii) For a same degree of intensity, all of the
characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
(iii) The degree to be assigned to the position for the whole
factor, is determined by the degree which predominates (i.e. the
degree that has been assigned for at least five of the eight
characteristics - "A", "B", 'C", "D", "E", "F", "G" and "H").
When one degree does not predominate, raters are to compare the
overall intensity of the requirements of the position under the
factor, with that of the bench-mark positions_ and determine and
attribute to the position the degree which best equates to
bench-mark positions
DEGREE 1
|
DEGREE 2
|
DEGREE 3
|
DEGREE 4
|
DEGREE 5
|
Characteristic A: The availability
|
of, and the problems
|
involved in obtaining information
|
and data.
|
|
The work requires
obtaining or receiving
information and data from
easily accessible sources.
|
The work requires
obtaining information and
data by direct observation, collection or selection from
established
recognized sources.
|
The work requires
obtaining, by investigation, information and data
which are often difficult
to obtain, interpret and
select. Sources may be
identified from past
practices or guidelines.
|
The work requires
obtaining, by intensive
investigation, informs-
Lion and data which are
often difficult to obtain,
interpret and select.
Sources are difficult to
identify and to access.
|
The work requires
coordinating the collection and selection of
information and data which
are usually obtained with
great difficulty and
require the conduct of
intensive study and
investigation. Sources
are likely to be obscure
or have to be developed.
|
Characteristic B: The validity
|
of information and data.
|
|
|
|
Information and data of
known validity are obtained
from recognized reliable
sources or by standardized
procedures.
|
Information and data can
normally be validated by
known procedures or
literature references.
|
Information and data can
normally be validated by
a combination of experimentation and detailed
literature referencing or
further field
investigations.
|
Information and data can
be validated only by
difficult or complex
investigations.
|
Information and data may
not be completely
validatable.
|
Characteristic C: The number
|
and variability of the variables
|
and the ambiguity of information
|
and data.
|
|
Information and data are
characterized by few
variables, low variability, lack of ambiguity and
are of known implications.
|
Information and data are
characterized by several
variables requiring
interpretation, but of
known implications and
variability.
|
Information and data can
be characterized by
several variables requiring interpretation, poorly
defined variability and
some ambiguity.
|
Information and data can
be characterized by variability, many variables,
difficulty of interpretation, and the need for judgment to use
the
data.
|
Information and data are
characterized by high
variability, many variables, ambiguity, and
require ingenuity and
highly selective
judgment to use.
|
Characteristic D: The relationships
|
of the variables.
|
|
|
|
Relationships between the
variables are simple and
known.
|
Relationships between the
variables can be established and inconsistencies resolved by
straight-forward investigation.
|
Relationships between
variables are sometime
conflicting and require
investigation and
interpretation.
|
Relationships between
variables are complicated
and require in-depth
investigation to identify
and resolve conflicts and
interpretation problems.
|
Relationships between
variables are often
conflicting and difficult
to define and measure.
|
Characteristic E: The effect
|
of the activities of others
|
on the work.
|
|
|
Limited effects from the
activities of others within
the organizational unit.
|
Work is normally affected
by the activities of
others within the organizational unit and occasionally by the
activities
of others outside the
organizational unit.
|
Work is frequently
affected by the
activities of scientists
and officials outside the
organizational unit.
|
Work is normally affected
by the activities of
scientists and officials
outside the organizational
unit, and requires consideration of the implication of their
activities on a project or the
ongoing activity.
|
The work of a significant
program activity is
affected by the activities
of other organizations or
agencies and requires
consideration of the
implications of the
activities of their
senior scientists or
officials.
|
FACTOR: COMPLEXITY OF
|
(WORK ( COHT'D)
|
|
|
|
DEGREE I
|
DEGREE 2
|
DEGREE 3
|
DEGREE 4
|
DEGREE 5
|
Characteristic F: The nature
|
and purpose of contacts with
|
others.
|
|
|
Contacts are with others
within own organizational
unit far obtaining and
discussing information,
|
Contacts are with others
working in the same or
closely related subject
areas for obtaining and
exchanging information
and discussing problems.
May provide information
and facts to the public
and the media.
|
Contacts are with
scientists and officials
for obtaining and exchanging information, participating in
cooperative
projects, resolving
problems, and providing
advice. May explain
on-going activities and
objectives of the work
and exchange information
with the public and the
media.
|
Contacts are with
scientists and officials
outside the organizational
unit for arranging co-
operative projects,
negotiating terms of
agreements, establishing
standards, implementing
regulations, and for
providing advice based on
recognized expertise. May
provide scientific and
technical information to
the public and the media
on contentious issues.
|
Contacts are with senior
scientists and officials
at the national and
international levels at
meetings where conflicting interest are represented,
and agreement affecting a significant program activity are
negotiated. May represent the department at public forums and
with the media.
|
Characteristic G: The requirement
application.
|
for the development of
|
concepts and approaches, procedures,
|
techniques and practices, their
|
adaptation and
|
The work involves applying
conventional practices,
techniques and procedures.
Minor adaptations may be
required.
|
The work requires adapting
practices, techniques, and
procedures.
|
The work requires
developing new techniques
and procedures using known
approaches and existing
precedents.
|
The work requires
developing new procedures
and techniques using
novel approaches where
precedents often do not
exist.
|
The work requires
approving or recommending
new procedures and developing new concepts and
approaches. Work is characterized by the
absence of precedents.
|
Characteristic H: The theoretical
|
and practical knowledge
|
which must be applied.
|
|
|
The work requires the
application of a sound
knowledge of the
principles and theories of
a discipline and some
familiarity with its
practices.
|
The work requires the
application of a sound
knowledge of the principles, theories and
practices of a discipline
and some familiarity with
the practices in related
disciplines.
|
The work requires the
application of a thorough
knowledge of the
principles, theories and
practices of a subject
area and its pertinent
disciplines, and familiarity with the practices
in related disciplines,
subject areas or
supervisory practices.
|
The work requires the
application of a thorough
knowledge of the
principles, theories and
practices of a specialized
subject area, and a
knowledge of related
scientific disciplines,
subject areas or of
management practices.
|
The work requires the
application of an advanced
knowledge of the principles, theories and practices of a
specialized subject area, and a good knowledge of related
scientific disciplines,
subject areas or of
management practices.
|
FACTOR: "PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY"
This factor is used to measure the difficulty of the work in
terms of the checks and controls over the work and the
professional leadership received. It is also used to measure the
requirement to exercise initiative and professional judgment in
defining objectives and dealing with problems, and establishing
scientific guidelines; and judgment in reviewing and assessing
the work of others, interpreting results, findings and
recommendations, and in providing advice.
Notes to Raters
(i) When evaluating a position under this
factor, raters are to consider the factor characteristics and
their intensity ranging from degree 1 to degree 5, and attribute
to the position, for each characteristic, the degree whose
definition best reflects the conditions that are typical of the
work of the position and most closely corresponds to the
intensity of its requirements in terms of the characteristic.
(ii) For a same degree of intensity, all of
the characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
(iii) The degree to be assigned to the
position for the whole factor, is determined by the degree which
predominates (i.e. the degree that has been assigned for at least
four of the six characteristics - "A", "B", "C", D", "E", "F").
When one degree does not predominate, raters are to compare the
overall intensity of the requirements of the position under the
factor, with that of the bench-mark positions, and determine and
attribute to the position the degree which best equates to the
bench-mark positions.
DEGREE 1
|
DEGREE 2
|
DEGREE 3
|
DEGREE 4
|
DEGREE 5
|
Characteristic A: The extent
|
to which work is checked by others.
|
|
|
|
Work is reviewed for
consistency and accuracy
while in progress and on
completion.
|
Work is accepted as
technically accurate. Work
assignments and conclusions
are reviewed for
consistency and
completeness.
|
Work approaches,
recommendations and
conclusions are reviewed
for soundness of judgment
in terms of the attainment
of study or project
objectives.
|
Key recommendations and
conclusions are reviewed
for effectiveness. Results
are periodically reviewed
in terms of the attainment
of objectives.
|
Results are evaluated in
terms of achievement of
policy and program
objectives.
|
Characteristic 8: The professional
|
guidance received.
|
|
|
|
Professional guidance is
received to assure correct
use of methods and
techniques.
|
Professional guidance is
received on new aspects of
the work.
|
Professional guidance is
received on the resolution
of difficult problems.
|
Professional guidance is
received on the resolution
of unusual and complex
problems.
|
Guidance is received on
policy intent and program
implications. Profession
guidance may be received
from other scientific
authorities.
|
Characteristic C: The requirement
guidelines.
|
to exercise initiative and
|
judgment in defining objectives
|
and dealing with problems
|
and establishing scientific
|
Work requires indicating
problems and selecting
methods, techniques actor-
ding to established
procedure manuals,
guidelines or precedents.
|
Work requires identifying
problems and determining
approaches and suitable
methods for their
resolution.
|
Work requires defining
objectives of studies,
identifying problems and
determining approaches for
the resolution of difficult
problems within own subject
area.
|
Work requires establishing
the limitations and defining the objectives of projects or
studies and indicating likely
approaches for the resolution of unusual and difficult
problems within related subject areas.
|
Work requires defining
objectives, developing
conceptual approaches to
complex problems and
establishing scientific
guidelines for a significant program activity.
|
Characteristic D: The requirement
|
to exercise judgment in
|
reviewing and assessing the work
|
of others.
|
|
Work of support staff is
checked for correct
application of procedures
and consistency of results.
|
The work of subordinate
staff is reviewed while in
progress and on completion
for technical accuracy.
External submissions are
reviewed for completeness
and compliance with data
requirements.
|
Work of subordinate staff
or project team members is
reviewed for completeness
and compliance with standards and guidelines. Within own
subject area, results and findings of other scientists are
reviewed for validity or
for applicability to own
subject area.
|
Work approaches,
recommendations and conclusions of subordinate staff
or project team members,
are reviewed for soundness
of judgment. Other
scientists' proposals and
studies that are related to
own specialized subject
area, are reviewed for
acceptability.
|
Recommendations and
conclusions of staff are
reviewed in term of
validity and effectiveness
with respect to establish
policy, directives, guide
lines and resource limitations. Major studies or
activities of other
scientists are evaluated
with respect to own
program's objectives.
|
Characteristic E: The requirement
|
to exercise judgment in
|
interpreting results of work.
|
|
|
Own observations are
reviewed to ensure
reliability and
consistency.
|
Scientific observations and
results are interpreted to
produce meaningful information, conclusions, recommendations
or reports.
|
Complex scientific data or
results, conclusions and
recommendations of
subordinate staff or other
scientists are interpreted
to determine their meaning
and implications on work
activities.
|
Results of studies or
projects are interpreted to
determine the implications
of conclusions and recommendations on the objectives of own
work and
significance to related
scientific and other
activities.
|
Results of major studies,
conclusions and recommendations are interpreted to
determine their broad
implications on scientific or other related activities
affecting a significant
program activity.
|
Characteristic F: The requirement
|
to exercise judgment in
|
giving advice.
|
|
|
Instructions and guidance
may be provided to support
staff on matters closely
related to the work
performed.
|
Advice is provided to
colleagues and support
staff on matters closely
related to own area of
work.
|
Specific technical advice
within own subject area is
provided to other
scientists and officials
and immediate superior.
Guidance on scientific
matters is provided to
subordinate staff or to
other scientists
contributing to the work.
|
Advice based on a
recognized expertise within
a specialized subject area,
is given to other
scientists and officials.
|
Authoritative advice and
recommendations in a numb
of related specialized
subject areas affecting a
significant program
activity, are provided to
other scientists and semi
officials.
|
FACTOR: "MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY"
This factor is used to measure the difficulty of the work in
terms of the responsibility for committing, controlling and
managing resources; obtaining outside assistance; controlling and
coordinating work; and, for implementing or developing
procedures, directives and guidelines.
Notes to Raters
(i) When evaluating positions under this
factor, raters are to consider the factor's characteristics and
their intensity ranging from degree 1
to degree 5, and attribute to the position, for each
characteristic, the degree whose definition best reflects the
conditions that are
typical of the work of the position and most closely corresponds
to the intensity of its requirements in terms of the
characteristic.
(ii) For a same degree of intensity, all of the
characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
(iii) The degree to be assigned to the position for the whole
factor, is determined by the degree which predominates (i.e. the
degree that has been assigned for at least four of the seven
characteristics - "A" "B" "C" "D", "E", "F", "G"). When one
degree does not predominate, raters are to compare the overall
intensity of the requirements of the position under the factor,
with that of the bench-mark positions, and determine and
attribute to the position the degree which best equates to the
bench-mark positions.
DEGREE I
|
DEGREE 2
|
DEGREE 3
|
DEGREE 4
|
DEGREE 5
|
Characteristic A: Responsibility
|
for the control of staff.
|
|
|
|
The work occasionally
requires assigning work
to non-subordinate
support staff.
|
The work normally requires
supervision of support
staff.
|
The work requires the
supervision of a unit
normally including
professional staff.
|
The work requires the
operational management of
professional staff including specialists or
subordinate supervisors.
|
The work requires the
management and human
resources planning through
subordinate supervisors of
a large staff of
professionals.
|
Characteristic B: Responsibility
|
for the control of physical
|
resources.
|
|
|
Planning day-to-day use
of equipment and supplies
for own work,
|
Ensuring proper use of
allocated equipment,
supplies and facilities.
|
Controlling the use and
the maintenance of
allocated equipment,
supplies and facilities,
|
Allocating the use of
equipment, supplies and
facilities.
|
Planning, directing and
controlling the physical
resources allocated for a
significant program
activity.
|
Characteristic C: Responsibility
|
for committing departmental
|
resources.
|
|
|
Limited to the spending
of own time and the use
of materials and
equipment for own work.
|
Identifying the. -
requirement for equipment,
material and services for
assigned work.
|
Recommending the
acquisition of specific
equipment, material and
services to meet work
requirements.
|
Assessing requirements and
developing and recommending plans for the acquisition and use
of resources, and the expenditure of funds to meet work
priorities and
objectives.
|
Exercising delegated
authority under the
Financial Administration
Act for the acquisition of
resources and expenditure
of funds; or, providing
authoritative advice for
major expenditures or
commitments of depart
mental resources.
|
Characteristic D: Responsibility
|
for obtaining outside assistance.
|
|
|
|
Informing supervisor
concerning the need for
assistance.
|
Recommending on the need
for assistance.
|
Substantiating the need
for, defining specific
requirements, and identifying suitable sources
of assistance; and,
arranging for readily
available assistance.
|
Selecting and negotiating
for suitable sources of
assistance relating the
probable costs and
benefits; or, providing
advice based on a recognized expertise within a
specialized subject area,
on requirements and
selection of outside
assistance.
|
Approving or recommending
the expenditure of funds
for outside assistance;
or, providing authoritative advice on requirements
and
outside assistance for major
commitments.
|
Characteristic E: Responsibility
|
for the administrative control
|
of work.
|
|
|
Complying with
procedures, directives
and guidelines established for the work.
|
Ensuring that quality,
quantity, safety and other
standards for own responsibility are maintained.
|
Implementing quality
assurance, performance
measurement and safety
procedures to meet unit's
objectives.
|
Controlling and
coordinating project
schedules and establishing
and implementing performance and safety standards
and controls to meet
priorities and objectives.
|
Preparing budgets and work
plans, planning and implementing safety. quality and cost
controls, and recommending objectives
and priorities for a significant program activity.
|
Characteristic F: Responsibility
|
for the co-ordination of
|
work performed for, or in conjunction
|
with other organizational
|
units.
|
Limited requirement for
coordination of activities with those of others,
|
Occasionally coordinating
related activities with
those of others,
|
Coordinating related
activities with those of
others.
|
Coordinating differing
activities with those of
one or more organizational
units.
|
Coordinating activities
with several other
organizational units with
differing interests or
conflicting priorities.
|
Characteristic G: Responsibility
|
for implementing or developing
|
administrative procedures,
|
safety and management directives
|
and guidelines.
|
Following straightforward
office or field administrative procedures.
|
Implementing office or
field administrative
procedures.
|
Interpreting and
implementing guidelines
and directives.
|
Recommending and
developing internal
administrative, safety and
management directives and
guidelines.
|
Approving internal
administrative, safety and
management directives and
guidelines, and ensuring
correct and consistent
application of department
and central agency policy,
directives and guidelines.
|
FACTOR: "IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND
ACTIVITIES"
This factor is used to measure the nature and the extent of
the impact directly attributable to the recommendations and
activities of the position, given its particular purpose or
mission, on governmental work or programs; on industrial or
commercial operations, natural resources or the environment,
public health and safety, and other external areas directly
affected by the position; and, on the development and
understanding of a body of knowledge in a subject area.
Notes to Raters
i) When evaluating a position under this factor, raters
are to consider the factor characteristics and the extent of the
impact ranging from degree I to degree 5, and attribute to the
position, for each applicable characteristic, the degree whose
definition best reflects or corresponds to the extent of the most
likely impact of the position.
ii) For a same degree of impact, all of the
characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
iii) The degree to be assigned to the position for the
whole factor is determined by the degree which predominates (i.e.
the degree that has been assigned for at least two of the three
characteristics - "A"; the one "B" characteristics: i, ii, iii,
or iv identified as the most pertinent to the purpose or mission
of the position; and, "C"). When one degree does not predominate,
raters are to compare the overall extent of the impact of the
position under the factor with that of the bench-mark positions,
and determine and attribute to the position the degree which best
equate to the bench-mark positions.
(Impact - Governmental)
DEGREE 1
|
DEGREE 2
|
DEGREE 3
|
DEGREE 4
|
DEGREE 5
|
Characteristic A:
|
|
|
|
|
The impact of recommendations
policies.
|
and activities on departmental
|
work or other government programs
|
in terms of changes to on-going
|
activities, programs or
|
Information and results of
the work have limited
effects on a continuing
operation, project or
study in own area of work.
|
Information and results of
the work affect a
continuing operation,
projects or studies in own
or closely related areas
of work.
|
Recommendations, advice
and results of the work
affect a continuing operation, the formulation of
guidelines, regulations,
specifications or standards, and the development
or conduct of projects or
studies in own and related
areas of work.
|
Recommendations, advice or
consultations contribute
to the development of
policies and affect the
development, conduct or
modification of a significant program activity; or decisions
affect the implementation of
projects, studies, guidelines and directives.
|
Authoritative
recommendations, advice or
consultations affect the
development of departmental policies and programs;
decisions and activities
affect the program(s) or
activities of other government organizations; or
decisions and recommendations affect the
development, initiation, conduct or continuation of a
significant program activity.
|
(Impact - External)
|
|
|
|
|
Characteristics B:
|
|
|
|
|
(i)The impact of recommendations
regulatory effect.
|
and activities on
|
an industrial or commercial process,
|
operation or product in terms
|
of the contributory or
|
Information and results of
the work have limited
effects on an industrial
or commercial product,
process or operation.
|
Information and results of
the work have economic or
technological effects on
an industrial or commercial product, process or
operation.
|
Recommendations, advice
and results of the work
have economic or techno-
logical effects on related
industrial or commercial
products, processes or
operations.
|
Recommendations, advice,
consultations or decisions
have economic or technological effects on an industry or a
broad range of products, processes or operations.
|
Authoritative
recommendations, advice,
consultations or decisions
have a substantial effect
on the development, initiation, modification or
continuation of industrial
or commercial enterprises.
|
(ii) The impact of recommendations
environment.
|
and activities in
|
terms of the contribution to or
|
control of the state of natural
|
resources or the
|
Information and results of
the work have limited
effects on the state of a
natural resource or the
environment.
|
Information and results of
the work contribute to
improvements for developing, protecting, conserving or using
natural resources or the
environment.
|
Recommendations, advice
and results of the work
affect the state of
natural resources and,
natural resource and
environmental management
practices.
|
Recommendations, advice or
consultations contribute
to the development of
environmental and natural
resource policies; or
decisions and recommendations affect the state of the
environment or the conservation and use of natural resources
within established policies.
|
Authoritative
recommendations, advice or
consultations have a
substantial effect on the
development of policies
relating to natural
resources or the environment; or decisions and
recommendations substantially affect natural
resources or the
environment.
|
(iii)The impact of recommendations
safety hazards.
|
and activities in terms
|
of the contribution to public
|
health and the reduction or
|
the control of health and
|
Information and results of
the work have limited
effects on public health
or safety.
|
Information and results of
the work contribute to
determining the efficacy
and safety of the processing or use of foods, drugs or medical
and radiation emitting devices or to the regulatory control
of
potentially hazardous products or substances.
|
Recommendations, advice
and results of the work
affect the approval and
use of foods, drugs, or
medical and radiation
emitting or other devices
with respect to efficacy
and safety, or the regulatory control of potentially hazardous
products or substances.
|
Recommendations, advice or
consultations contribute
to the development of
policies; or decisions and
recommendations affect the
approval and use of foods,
drugs or medical and
radiation emitting or
other devices or other
potentially hazardous
products or substances
with respect to efficacy
or safety.
|
Authoritative
recommendations, advice or
consultations have a
substantial effect on the
development of public
health and safety
policies; or decisions and
recommendations substantially affect the control of
potential hazards to public health or safety
|
FACTOR: IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND
ACTIVITIES (CONT'D)
DEGREE 1
|
DEGREE 2
|
DEGREE 3
|
DEGREE 4
|
DEGREE 5
|
Characteristics 8: (Cont'd)
|
|
|
|
|
(iv)The impact of recommendations
areas directly affected
Information and results of
the work have limited
effects on the specifically identified area directly affected
by the position.
|
and activities in terms
by the position, given its
Information and results of
the work have contributory
effects on the specifically identified area
directly affected by the
position.
|
of the contributory or regulatory
particular purpose or mission.
Recommendations, advice
and results of the work
have direct effects on the
specifically identified
area directly affected by
the position.
|
effect on other specifically
Recommendations, advice or
consultations contribute
to the development of
policies; or decisions and
recommendations have wide
ranging effects on the
specifically identified
area directly affected by
the position,
|
identified external
Authoritative
recommendations, advice or
consultations have a
substantial effect on the
development of policies;
or decisions and recommendations have substantial effects
on the
specifically identified area directly affected by the
position.
|
Characteristic C:
|
|
|
|
|
The impact of recommendations
|
and activities in terms of the
|
contribution to the development
|
and understanding of a body
|
of knowledge.
|
Information and results of
the work contribute to
knowledge in own area of
work.
|
Information and results of
the work contribute to
improvements in methods
and procedures in own area
of work.
|
Development of new methods
and procedures and the
investigation, analysis
and interpretation of
scientific information
provide knowledge and
improved understanding in
own subject area.
|
Development of new
concepts and approaches;
or, decisions or recommendations contribute to
knowledge and improved understanding in a specialized subject
area.
|
Decisions and
recommendations affect the
initiation, continuation
or orientation of studies
or projects for the
development of concepts,
methods, approaches and
procedures to acquire new
knowledge in one or more
specialized subject areas.
|
POSITION LEVELS: TYPICAL DISTINGUISHING
FEATURES
"A GUIDE FOR OVERALL CONSISTENCY
Intent: This Guide broadly aims at providing a
consistent approach to a global perception or an orientation for
a determination of the approximate classification level of a
position, using a series of discernible main features
characterizing positions identified as typical of each level.
Provision: i) Notwithstanding the above, the Guide is
not intended nor shall be used as a substitute for the formal
position classification process and the detailed analysis and
rating of each position, as required in accordance with the
provisions of the rating plan of the Classification Standard.
ii) The series of distinguishing features shown for the
levels, characterizes, as a whole, universes of positions
considered typical of each level. - The series of features for a
level shall not be construed as all inclusive nor as relevant in
its entirety, to all positions at that level.
Advantages: The use of the Guide can be of assistance in
narrowing, at the outset, the range of possible levels indicated
for a position and thus, contributes to a less erratic approach
to the discussions for its subsequent detailed analysis and
rating. Further, the distinguishing features shown for the
various levels in the Guide, and which have been found typical of
positions at those levels, provide a broad reference framework
which can be of value and, contributes in achieving greater
overall consistency in the classification of the positions at the
various levels for the Group.
LEVEL 1
|
LEVEL 3
|
LEVEL 4
|
(Positions at Recruiting/Familiarizing
Developing Level as well as Positions
conducting Work of Relatively Low
Complexity)
- Repetitive, Standardized work of
relatively low Complexity
- Work subjected to Detailed Review
- Limited scope for Independent Actions
- Carry out Scientific procedures under
supervision
- Indicate required Support Work to
non-subordinate support staff
|
(Positions with Significant
Specialization, Diversity/Complexity or
with Significant Supervisory
Responsibility)
- Expertise in a specialized Subject
Area
- First Level of Scientific Advisory
Responsibility
- Liaison Work Responsibility
- Diversity/Complexity
- Provide Scientific Project Leadership
- Development of New Methods
- Validations of: Procedures
Techniques
|
(Positions requiring a High Level of
Scientific Expertise or Position comprising
the First Level of Science Based Management
Responsibility)
- High Level of Expertise in a specialized
subject area
- Second Level of Scientific Advisory
Responsibility
- Recognized Authority in a Subject
- Scientific Co-ordination Responsibility
- First level of Management Responsibility
- Project Objective Responsibility
- Second Level Supervision
|
LEVEL 2
|
: Methods
Facilities
|
LEVEL 5
|
(Positions Conducting Basic Professional
Work of Moderate Complexity/Diversity)
- Moderate Complexity/Diversity
- Scope for Independent Actions
- May Instruct Junior Scientists and
Supervise Support Staff
- Work Reviewed at Critical
Stages/Phases
|
- First Supervisory Level:
- Activities of a Unit
- Lead a Group
- Lead a Project Team
|
(Positions at the Highest Level of Scientific
Management within the Group or Positions
requiring the Highest level of Scientific
Expertise within the Group)
- Highest Level of Expertise in a Specialized
Subject Area
- A Senior Departmental Scientific Advisor
- High Level Co-ordination/Liaison
- Broad scope for Independent Actions within
Policy and Resources Framework
- Significant input in Policy Development
- Management of a Science Based Significant
Program Activity, a Significant Work Group
or Large Complex Project
|
LIST OF BENCH-MARK
POSITIONS
#
|
TITLE
|
LEVEL
|
1
|
Biologist - Development Grade (HWC)
|
1
|
2
|
Fruit Tree Biologist (Apples and Pears) (AGR)
|
1
|
3
|
Food Microbiologist (HWC)
|
2
|
4
|
Marine Biologist (F&O)
|
2
|
5
|
Park Ecologist (EC)
|
2
|
6
|
Anadromous Fish Biologist (F&0)
|
2
|
7
|
Wildlife Biologist - Migratory Birds (EC)
|
3
|
8
|
Plant Pathology Biologist (AGR)
|
3
|
9
|
Insecticide Evaluation Biologist (AGR)
|
3
|
10
|
Pesticide Evaluation Biologist (EC)
|
3
|
11
|
Salmon Assessment Biologist (F&0)
|
3
|
12
|
Lake Enrichment Biologist (F&O)
|
3
|
13
|
Specialist, Food Microbiology (HWC)
|
3
|
14
|
Specialist, Drug Microbiology (HWC)
|
3
|
15
|
Head, Marine Microbiology Laboratory (EC)
|
3
|
16
|
Water Development Impacts Ecologist (EC)
|
4
|
17
|
Chief, Migratory Birds Conservation (EC)
|
4
|
18
|
Head, Food Microbiology Laboratory Unit (HWC)
|
4
|
19
|
Head, Fish and Marine Mammal Management Division (F&O)
|
4
|
20
|
Senior Policy/Program Advisor, Marine Fisheries (F&0)
|
5
|
21
|
Head, Food Chemicals Section (HWC)
|
5
|
RATING SUMMARY - BENCH-MARK
POSITIONS
|
|
FACTOR:
1
FACTOR:
2
FACTOR: 3 FACTOR: 4
|
FACTOR: 5
|
B.
M.
V KIND OF
ASSIGNMENT COMPLEXITY
OF WORK PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY MNGM'NT
RESPONSIBILITY
|
IMPACT OF RECOMM. 6 ACTVTIES
|
NO.
TITLE LVL
CHARACTERISTIC/DECREE
CHARACTERISTIC/DECREE
CHARACTERISTIC/DECREE
CHARACTERISTIC/DECREE
|
CHARACTERISTIC/DECREE
I
|
|
|
|
|
V .
|
B
|
|
|
A B C
|
D FACT
|
A B
|
C D
|
E F G H FACT
|
A B C D E F A B C D E F G FACT
|
A
|
(i) (Hi) (iii) (iv) + B C FACT
|
|
1 Biologist - Development Grads
|
V
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(HWC)
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2 2
|
2 1
|
1 1 1 1
|
2
|
1 1 1 1 1 1
|
1
|
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
|
1
|
1
|
2 - 2 - 2 1
|
1
|
2 Fruit Tree Biologist (AGR)
|
1
|
2 1 1
|
1
|
1
|
2 1
|
2 2
|
1 1 2 2
|
2
|
1 2 1 2 2 1
|
2
|
2 2 1 1 2 1 1
|
1
|
1
|
2 - - - 2 1
|
1
|
3 Food Microbiologist (WC)
|
2
|
2 2 2
|
2
|
2
|
2 2
|
2 2
|
2 3 2 2
|
2
|
2 2 2 1 2 3
|
2
|
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
|
1
|
2
|
2 - Z - 2 2
|
2
|
4 Marine Biologist (F&0)
|
2
|
2 2 2
|
2
|
2
|
2 2
|
2 2
|
2 1 2 2
|
2
|
2 2 2 1 2 2
|
2
|
1 2 2 1 2 2 1
|
2
|
I
|
Z 2 - - 2 2
|
2
|
5 Park Ecologist (EC)
6 Anadromous Fish Biologist
|
2
|
2 2 2
|
2
|
2
|
2 2
|
2 2
|
2 2 2 2
|
2
|
3 2 2 3 2 2
|
2
|
1 1 2 2 2 2 1
|
2
|
2
|
2 2 - - 2 2
|
2
|
(EC)
7 Wildlife Biologist - Migratory
|
2
|
2 2 2
|
3
|
2
|
2 2
|
2 2
|
2 2 2 2
|
2
|
3 2 2 2 2 3
|
2
|
2 3 2 2 2 2 2
|
2
|
2
|
2 Z - - 2 2
|
2
|
Birds (EC)
|
3
|
3 3 2
|
3
|
3
|
3 3
|
3 3
|
2 3 2 3
|
3
|
3 3 3 3 2 3
|
3
|
2 2 2 3 2 3 2
|
1
|
3
|
2 3 - - 3 3
|
3
|
8 Plant Pathology Biologist (AGR)
9 Insecticide Evaluation Biologist
|
3
|
3 3 2
|
3
|
3
|
3 2
|
3 3
|
3 3 3 3
|
3
|
3 3 3 3 3 3
|
3
|
2 2 2 2 2 2 2
|
2
|
3
|
3 2 - - 3 3
|
3
|
(AGR)
10 Pesticide Evaluation Biologist
|
3
|
3 3 3
|
3
|
3
|
3 3
|
4 3
|
4 3 3 3
I
|
3
|
3 3 3 3 3 3
|
3
|
1 1 1 2 1 3 1
|
1
|
3
|
3 2 3 - 7 3
|
1
|
(EC)
11 Salmon Assessment Biologist
|
3
|
3 3 3
|
3
|
3
|
3 3
|
4 3
|
3 3 3 3
|
3
|
3 3 3 3 3 3
|
3
|
1 1 1 2 1 3 1
|
t
|
3
|
3 3 2 - 3 3
|
3
|
(F&0) .
12 Lake Enrichment Biologist
|
3
|
3 3 3
|
3
|
3
|
3 3
|
3 3
|
2 3 3 3
|
3
|
3 3 3 3 3 3
|
3
|
2 2 2 2 2 3 1
|
2
|
3
|
3 3 - - 3 3
|
3
|
(F&0)
13 Specialist Food Microbiology
|
3
|
3 3 3
|
3
|
3
|
3 3
|
3 3
|
2 3 3 3
|
3
|
3 3 3 3 3 3
|
3
|
2 2 3 3 3 2 2
|
2
|
3
|
Z 3 - - 3 3
|
3
|
(HWC)
t• Specialist, Drug Microbiology
|
3
|
3 3 3
|
3
|
3
|
3 3
|
3 3
|
3 3 3 3
|
3
|
3 3 3 3 3 •
|
3
|
1 2 3 1 3 3 2
|
1
|
3
|
3 - 3 - 3 3
|
3
|
(HOC)
15 Head, Marine Microbiology
|
3
|
3 3 3
|
3
|
3
|
3 3
|
3 3
|
3 3 3 3
|
3
|
3 3 3 3 3 4
|
3
|
1 2 3 1 3 3 2
|
2
|
3
|
3 7 - 3 3
|
3
|
Laboratory (EC)
16 Water Development Impacts
|
3
|
3 3 3
|
3
|
3
|
3 2
|
3 3
|
3 3 3 3
|
3
|
3 3 3 3 3 3
|
3
|
3 3 3 3 3 3 3
|
3
|
3
|
2 3 3 - 3 3
|
3
|
Ecologist (EC)
17 Chief, Migratory Birds
|
4
|
4 4 4
|
4
|
4
|
4 4
|
4 4•
|
4 4 4
|
4
|
4 • 4 4 4 4
|
4
|
1 2 3 4 3 4 2
|
3
|
•
|
3 4 - -
|
|
Conservation (EC)
18 Head, Food Microbiology Lab. Unit
|
4
|
4 4 4
|
4
|
4
|
3 3
|
4 3•
|
4 3 4•
|
|
4 4 4 4 4 4
|
4
|
4 4 5 4 4 4 4
|
0
|
4
|
3 • 2 -
|
|
(H100
19 Head, Fish and Marine M-l
|
4
|
4 4 4
|
4
|
4
|
4 4
|
4 4
|
4 4 4•
|
4
|
4 4 4 4 3 4
|
4
|
4• 4•
|
|
|
|
|
Management Division (F60)
20 Senior Policy/Program Advisor,
|
4
|
4 4 4
|
4
|
4
|
4 5
|
4 5•
|
4 4 4
|
4
|
• 4 4 4 4 4
|
4
|
4 4 4 4 4 4 4•
|
|
•
|
4 • - 3 4 4
|
4
|
Marine Fisheries (FAG)
21 Head, Food Chemicals Section
|
5
|
5 5 5
|
5
|
5
|
5 5
|
5 5
|
5 5 5 5
|
5
|
5 5 5 5 5 5
|
5
|
1 2 4 4 1 4 3
|
3
|
5
|
5 5 - - 5 5
|
5
|
(HiWG)
|
5
|
5 5 5
|
5
|
5
|
5 5
|
5 5
|
5 5 4 5
|
5
|
5 5 5 5 5 5
|
5
|
• 2 4 4• 4 2•
|
|
5
|
4 S 5 5
|
5
|
(1)
|
|
|
(2)
(3) (4)
|
(5)
|
Key in order of appearance of
letters under the factors.
|
A = Objectives estbls by othrs
b = Extent of work
c = Variety of activities
d = Scope for plan'g and condct'ng wrk
|
|
|
A= info./data - Avlblty/problems
B= info./data -validity
C= info./data - n/varblty/Ambg'ty of variables
D = info./data - Relnsshps of variables
E = Effects of actvty of others on work
F = Contacts - Nature/Purpose
G = Reqrm'nt for: Devlpm'nt adpt'nt,
applct'n, apprchs, prodrs and techniques
H = Knowledge
|
A - Extent wrk check'd by
others
8 - Profsn'l guidance
C - Init./Judg'mt in recv'd
Def'ng objectives
Dealing w problems
Estblsh'ng
guidelines
D -Judgm'nt in assess'ng
work of others
E -Judgm'nt in intrprt'ng
results
F - Judgm'nt in providing advice
|
|
A - Rasp.: Control of
Staff
B - Resp.: Control of
physical resources
C - Resp.: Commt'ng
resources
D - Resp.: Obt'ng outside
..since
E - Resp.: Admin. contrl
of wrk
F - Resp.: Co-ord'n
wrk perf.
for/with othr
orgnztn'l units
G - Resp.: Implemnt'ng or
Devlp'ng
guidelines
|
|
|
IMPACT (Governmental)
A = on Dept'1 wrk/Other Gov.
progrms
(External)
i) - on Ind'1/Commerc'1 prod. oPer.
ii) - on Natrl. res./Envrnent
iii) - on Public health/safety
iv) - on Other external areas
C = Impact on body of knowledge
|
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 1
|
Level: 1
|
Descriptive Title: Biologist - Development Grade
|
|
Reporting to the Head, Microbiology Unit and
under the guidance of a senior microbiologist:
Conducts microbiological analyses of
progressively increasing diversity and complexity of samples of
foods, drugs, cosmetics and medical devices to provide
information for assessing the compliance of these products with
the provisions and regulations of the Food and Drugs Act, and to
acquire the specific knowledge and skills necessary to function
as an Official Analyst.
Plans and organizes daily work, selects
appropriate methods and conducts analyses using a variety of
microbiological and instrumental techniques. Prepares the
appropriate reagents, culture media and equipment following
established laboratory safety practices. Performs the required
number of analyses and validation procedures in accordance with
established quality assurance procedures. Interprets results and
prepares reports for review by the senior microbiologist or Unit
Head.
Carries out a continuing study of methods of
analysis, relevant regulations and standards under the Food and
Drugs Act and regulated industry practices in preparation for
assuming full responsibility as an Official Analyst.
Specifications
|
Degree
|
Kind of Assignments
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - Objectives are defined by the Unit Head and
the work is conducted under
the close guidance of a senior microbiologist.
|
|
B. Degree 1 - The generation of analytical data using
progressively more complex
methodology is part of a continuing operation requiring
limited investigation.
|
|
C. Degree 1 - While samples of foods, drugs, cosmetics and
medical devices represent a
substantial variety of substrates for analysis, batching of
similar types of samples
for training purposes, simplifies the work to a limited number
of straightforward
tasks to be performed successively.
|
|
D. Degree 1 - Tasks are planned on a daily basis taking into
account the activities of
others in the unit who share working space, equipment and
materials.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Information in term of the methods and
procedures is readily available,
but data is generated by direct observation using standardized
procedures.
|
|
B. Degree 2 - Information and data can be validated by
repeat analyses, and standard
confirmation procedures.
|
|
C. Degree 2 - The microbiological analyses of foods, drugs,
cosmetics and medical
devices for a variety of micro-organisms is characterized by
several variables such
as growth characteristics, morphology and biochemical
reactions requiring
interpretation but of known implications.
|
|
D. Degree 2 - Relationships between analytical results and
the identity and number of micro-organisms can be established and inconsistencies
resolved by straightforward investigation.
|
|
E. Degree 1 - Activities of others within the laboratory
may affect the availability of
common facilities or shared equipment.
F. Degree 1 - Contacts are normally with others in the
laboratory to obtain
information.
G. Degree 1 - The work involves applying standard methods of
analysis. Minor
adaptations may be made to suit specific sample
requirements.
H. Degree 1 - The work requires the application of a sound
knowledge of the principles
and theories of microbiology and some familiarity with
analytical practices.
|
Degree
|
Professional Responsibility
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - The work is checked in progress by a senior
microbiologist and results
are reviewed by a senior microbiologist or the Unit Head.
B. Degree 1 - Guidance on the selection and correct
application of methods and
procedures is received from a senior microbiologist.
C. Degree 1 - Identified problems and potential solutions
are discussed with a senior
microbiologist before proceeding.
D. Degree 1 - As applicable, the work of support staff may
be checked for correct
application of procedures.
E. Degree 1 - Final results are reviewed for reliability
and consistency and reported
to a senior microbiologist or Unit Head.
F. Degree 1 - As applicable, instructions and guidance may
be provided to support staff
engaged in similar activities.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - As applicable, technical instructions or
requests for technical
assistance are given to support staff.
B. Degree 1 - Plans use of equipment and supplies for
assigned work.
C. Degree 1 - Limited to the spending of own time and the
use of equipment and supplies
for assigned work.
D. Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required, is
requested from the Unit Head.
E. Degree 1 - Complies with administrative procedures,
directives and guidelines
established for the work.
F. Degree 1 - Limited requirement to coordinate work with
others.
C. Degree 1 - Follows administrative and safety procedures
established for the work.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - Analytical results are used in the
administration of the Food and Drugs
Act and Regulations, but are reviewed and checked by a Senior
Microbiologist or Unit
Head prior to use.
B. Degree 2 -
(i) Degree 2 - Identification of violations of the Food and
Drugs Act and
Regulations may result in the regulatory control of commercial
food, drugs
cosmetics or medical device products.
(ii) No significant impact.
(iii) Degree 2 - Results of the work contribute to the
regulatory control of foods,
drugs, cosmetics or medical device containing volatile levels
of
micro-organisms.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 1 - Analytical results contribute to the knowledge
of the identity and levels
of micro-organisms in foods, drugs, cosmetics and medical
devices.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Chief, Food and Drug Laboratory Division - Head - Food
Chemistry Unit
- Head - Drugs Analysis Unit
- Head - Microbiology Unit
- Biologist
* - Biologist, Development Grade BI-1
- Technician
- Lab. Support (GLT-MAN)
* Bench-mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 2
|
Level: 1
|
Descriptive Title: Fruit Tree Biologist (Apples and Pears)
|
|
Reporting to a Research Scientist - Fruit
Trees, Horticulture and Soil Science Section:
Conducts, evaluates and coordinates pre- and
post-selection trials of pear and apple breeding materials to
assess their potential as cultivars or root stocks. Selects
seedlings and clonal material based on their observed or reported
resistance to pests and diseases, fresh market, storage and
processing qualities or suitability as root stocks. Compiles and
analyses data to select the most promising materials to evaluate
further, using field trials and orchard management practices.
With guidance from and in consultation with
the research scientist, plans, develops and implements field
experiments and develops integrated crop management systems to
evaluate and develop new cultivars or varieties of pear and
apples in order to assess their potential for improved qualities,
yield, precocity, resistance to pests and diseases. In
collaboration with experimental farm personnel, prepares
allocated fields, plants material as planned and oversees care
and protection of field plots. Records and tabulates the
pertinent characteristics of specimens, analyses information and
evaluates results to identify the lines and rootstocks that have
potential as new varieties. Provides the research scientist with
a summary of results and identifies those which may be suitable
as new varieties. Provides information on new or proposed crop
management techniques to promote fruit yields and/or minimize the
use of pesticides.
Consults other members of the fruit tree
program to exchange information, keeps abreast of new technology
in integrated crop management systems, writes technical reports,
co-authors publications with the research scientist and provides
information and technology transfer to fruit tree growers of the
region as applicable.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kind of Assignment
|
1
|
A. Degree 2 - Objectives to which the experimental work of
the position contributes are
broad but the objectives of the work are clearly defined by
the Research Scientist
in terms of identifying improved stocks of apples and
pears.
B. Degree 1 - The work consist in laboratory and field
experiments to identify
seedlings and rootstocks with potentially improved fruit
characteristics when
crossed or combined.
C. Degree 1 - Activities are generally related to
horticulture and focused on apple
and pear tree genetics and crop management. The selection of
suitable rootstock and
seedling requires the examination of large numbers of
specimens using a limited
number of scientific techniques.
D. Degree 1 - The field experiments and laboratory tasks are
planned with the
supervising scientist and the work is conducted using
generally standardized
procedures and techniques.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Information and data on rootstocks and
seedlings sources is obtained by
direct observation and also from recognized orchard seed
growers in North America.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 1 - External sources of data and
information are considered reliable and the
data or information when conflicting can normally be validated
by known procedures.
C. Degree 2 - Information and data on seedlings, rootstocks
and clonal materials
include several characteristics which require interpretation
and which when combined
are expected to result in improved stocks.
D. Degree 2 - Relationship between variables and
inconsistencies can only be resolved
by field trial investigations.
E. Degree 1 - The scheduling of the work can be affected by
others using same equipment
or facilities within the same organization.
F. Degree 1 - Contacts to obtain or discuss information
with specialists or scientists
are principally within the same organization. Contacts with
growers are to obtain
or exchange information.
G. Degree 2 - Because of the experimental nature of genetic
hybridization the work
requires adapting and modifying standard techniques to develop
new varieties of
apples and pears as well as contributing to the development
and implementation of
new crop management procedures to reduce the need for
pesticides and promote
productivity, and to the development of field experiments to
evaluate cultivars and
rootstocks of pear and apple.
H. Degree 2 - The work requires a sound knowledge of plant
biology with emphasis on
horticulture, genetics and crop management practices for fruit
tree orchards.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 1 - Work is periodically reviewed while in
progress and on completion by the
supervising scientist.
B. Degree 2 - Guidance is available from the supervising
scientist on new trials or
other new aspects of the work.
C. Degree 1 - Particular conditions or problems are
indicated to the supervising
scientist. Methods and techniques are selected for the
work.
D. Degree 2 - The field or laboratory work of subordinate
support staff is checked
while in progress and on completion.
E. Degree 2 - Own observations and work results are
interpreted to produce meaningful
conclusions and recommendations for improving yield and
quality of pears and apples
and for new varieties.
F. Degree 1 - Instructions and guidance are provided to
support staff and information
on observation results are given to colleagues and to regional
growers as
applicable.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
1
|
A. Degree 2 - The work requires the supervision of one
full-time support staff and of
seasonal or casuals.
B. Degree 2 - Ensures proper use of allocated equipment and
supplies for the work
activities.
C. Degree 1 - Limited to the spending of time and the use
of materials and supplies for
the work.
D. Degree 1 - Informs supervisor concerning need for
assistance.
E. Degree 2 - Ensures that work for own responsibility
complies with standards
pertaining to quality, quantity and safety.
F. Degree 1 - Requirement to coordinate activities limited
to shared use of farm
implements and facilities. Interacts with other members of the
fruit program for
planning new experiments.
G. Degree 1 - Follows straightforward administrative
procedures and safety practices.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Impact of Recommendations and
Activities
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - Conclusions and findings contribute to on-going
research project. Work
is carried out in close liaison with the supervising scientist
and changes or impact
on departmental activities attributable to the work of the
position, would be
indirect or limited.
B. Degree 2 -
i) Degree 2 - Findings and recommendations concerning new
varieties of fruit trees
with desirable characteristics are used by the scientist and
can have future
economic impact on the pear and apple fruit industry;
ii) No significant impact.
iii) No significant impact.
iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 1 - Results of the work contribute to knowledge in
the area of pear and apple
fruit tree genetics.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
|
|
Chief, Horticulture and Soil Science Section
- Research Scientist - Fruit Trees
- Fruit Tree Biologist (Peaches)
* - Fruit Tree Biologist (Apples and Pears) BI-1
- Support Staff (CL-MAN) (1)
- Seasonal
* Bench-mark position.
|
|
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 3
|
Level: 2
|
Descriptive Title: Food Microbiologist
|
|
Reporting to the Head, Food Microbiology
Unit:
Conducts the microbiological analyses of a
wide variety of food products, to assist in the
enforcement and establishment of regulations and provisions of
the Food and Drugs Act. Provides scientifically valid qualitative
and quantitative information employing a variety of scientific
techniques for the isolation, identification, enumeration and
confirmation of microbial organisms and their toxins of sanitary
and health hazard significance.
Provides interpretation of results and
technical advice to officials of the department and industry,
conducts analysis as an Official Analyst, and provides testimony
as an expert witness in court.
Adapts methods to suit the unique requirements
of samples and assists in the development, evaluation and
validation of new methods, procedures and instrumental
techniques.
Ensures the correct application of safety and
quality assurance standards. Participates in the training of
junior microbiologists and technical staff.
Specifications
|
Degree
|
Kind of Assignments
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Objectives are defined by the Unit Head.
Samples are assigned but
methods are selected and adapted from available
procedures.
B. Degree 2 - The work involves the complete analysis and
interpretation of results to
determine the nature and level of microbiological
contamination of food products.
C. Degree 2 - The work involves the analysis of a wide
variety of foods for microbial
organisms and their toxins of sanitary and health hazard
significance.
D. Degree 2 - Own work is planned and methods are selected
to meet the objectives of
the work.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Information in term of the methods and
procedures is readily available,
but data is generated by direct observation using standardized
procedures.
B. Degree 2 - Information and data can be validated by
repeat analyses, standard
confirmation procedures or literature referencing.
C. Degree 2 - The microbiological analyses of foods for a
variety of micro-organisms is
characterized by several variables such as growth
characteristics, morphology and
biochemical reactions requiring interpretation but of known
implications.
D. Degree 2 - Relationships between analytical results and
the identity and number of
micro-organisms can be established and inconsistencies
resolved by straightforward
investigation.
E. Degree 2 - The activities of inspection staff affect the
type and priority of
samples to be analyzed.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with inspectors and regulated
industry officials to explain
results and with crown attorneys of the Department of Justice
to provide information
for the preparation of prosecutions.
|
|
|
Degree
|
G. Degree 2 - The work requires modifying, adapting and
evaluating new methods and
procedures for the microbiological analysis of foods.
H. Degree 2 - The work requires the application of a sound
knowledge of the principles,
theories and practices of food microbiology and of the
procedures and techniques for
the isolation and enumeration of micro-organisms as well as
some familiarity with
related food industry practices.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - The work requires the completion of
assignments, the interpretation of
results, and the preparation of final results which are
reviewed by the Unit Head.
B. Degree 2 - Professional guidance is received from the
Unit Head on new analytical
projects.
C. Degree 2 - The work requires identifying analytical
problems and selecting and
adapting methods for their resolution.
D. Degree 1 - As applicable, the work of technical staff is
checked for correct
application of methods and procedures.
E. Degree 2 - Analytical results are interpreted and
evaluated against specified
tolerances to determine compliance with the Food and Drugs Act
and Regulations and
to indicate violations of the legislation.
F. Degree 3 - Technical advice and explanation of results
is provided to inspectors,
departmental officials, and to crown attorneys with respect to
prosecutions.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - As applicable, technical instructions or
requests for assistance are
given to support staff.
B. Degree 1 - Plans the use of equipment and supplies for
own work.
C. Degree 1 - Limited to spending of own time and to the
use of equipment and supplies
for assigned work.
D. Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required, is
requested from the Unit Head.
E. Degree 1 - Complies with administrative procedures,
directives, guidelines and
quality assurance standards established for the work.
F. Degree 1 - Limited requirement to coordinate work with
others, except in order to
best utilize shared equipment and facilities.
G. Degree 1 - Follows administrative and safety procedures
established for the work.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Information and results of the work affect the
intensity and direction of
inspection activities.
B. Degree 2 -
(i) Degree 2 - Identification of violations of the Food and
Drugs Act and
Regulations may result in the regulatory control of commercial
food products.
(ii) No significant impact.
(iii) Degree 2 - Results of the work contribute to the
regulatory control of foods
containing volatile levels of microbiological
contaminants.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 2 - Information and results contribute to
knowledge of the levels of
microbiological contaminants in the food supply, and to
improvements in the methods
and procedures for the microbiological analyses of foods.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Chief, Food Laboratory Division
- Head - Drugs, Cosmetics and Medical Devices Microbiology
Unit
- Head - Mycotoxins and Food Additives Unit
- Head - Food Chemistry Unit
- Head - Organic Residues Unit
- Head - Food Microbiology Unit
- Specialist, Food Microbiology
* - Food Microbiologists (2) BI-2
- Microbiologist, Development Grade (1) BI-1
- Technicians (4)
- Lab. Support (2)
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 4
|
Level: 2
|
Descriptive Title: Marine Biologist
|
|
Reporting to the Senior Marine Biologist -
Aquatic Program
Plans, organizes and conducts marine ecological
studies to determine and assess the impact on marine ecology of
industrial process installations and their waste effluents
situated on or near the marine or estuarine coast of the Pacific
region.
Establishes marine biological baselines, determines and
applies the appropriate sampling techniques and analytical
procedures, analyses results and data to identify and assess the
impact on the marine ecology for the delineated sector and
records generated data, information and results for further
use.
Participates with colleagues in the biological
impact assessment process of specific industrial sites and
contributes to the development of compliance schedules,
regulations, guidelines or standards required to ensure the
protection of the marine environment and the preservation of fish
stocks. Acts as an expert witness in court as a result of
investigations of sites suspected to be in violation of Section
33 of the Fisheries Act.
Prepares reports on results of studies and
investigations, departmental briefs and scientific articles for
publication on study findings.
Specifications
|
Degree/
Points
|
Kind of Assignments
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Annual objectives and available resources are
clearly defined by the
supervising Senior Marine Biologist.
B. Degree 2 - The work normally consists of a limited
number for field surveys or
studies in river estuaries or at sea.
C. Degree 2 - The work involves collecting information from
various geographical
locations, on different marine plants and marine animal
species, water and marine
sediments in order to assess prevailing or changes in
conditions.
D. Degree 2 - Own activities are planned, sampling
approaches and methods are selected
to ensure that objectives are met.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Marine ecological data and information are
collected by direct
observation, sampling, and from analysis in the laboratory,
using established
procedures.
B. Degree 2 - Acceptable marine ecological information and
data can normally be
validated by resampling, comparison with similar sites, and
literature references.
C. Degree 2 - Marine ecological data is characterized by
variables requiring
interpretation but of known implications and variability.
D. Degree 2 - Discrepancies in observations can normally be
resolved by straightforward
investigations or repeating limited surveys.
|
|
|
Degree/
Points
|
E. Degree 2 - The work is normally affected only by others
within the same
organization but occasionally, facilities or vessels must be
shared with others at
sea and requires consideration of their activities in
scheduling the tasks.
F. Degree 1 - Contacts are normally within own
organizational unit and occasionally
with other scientists working in same study area for
exchanging and discussing
information.
G. Degree 2 - The work requires adapting or modifying
procedures and sampling
techniques to investigate and determine effects of identified
industrial pollutants
on marine ecological conditions for area under study.
H. Degree 2 - The work requires the applications of a sound
knowledge of the principles,
theories and practices of marine ecology and some familiarity
with oceanography and
chemistry practices.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Work is accepted as technically accurate.
Assessments reports,
recommendations and conclusions are reviewed for consistency
and completeness.
B. Degree 2 - Guidance is provided by the supervising Senior
Marine Biologist on new
aspects of the work.
C. Degree 2 - The work requires identifying study and
assessment problems, determining
particular approaches, sampling techniques and suitable
methods to deal with usual
problems.
D. Degree 1 - The work of non-subordinate support staff
assisting on cruises is checked
while in progress and on completion for correctness.
E. Degree 2 - Own observations and study results are
interpreted to produce meaningful
assessments, information, conclusions, recommendations or
reports.
F. Degree 2 - Advice is provided to colleagues on matters
relating to own area of work (marine ecology).
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 1 - The work occasionally requires assigning work
to non-subordinate support
staff while on cruises.
B. Degree 2 - The work requires ensuring proper use of
allocated equipment, supplies
and facilities.
C. Degree 2 - Identifies requirements for equipment, material
and services to
supervisor.
D. Degree 1 - Informs supervisor concerning need for outside
assistance.
E. Degree 2 - Ensures that quality, quantity, safety and
other work standards for own
responsibility are maintained and that services provided meet
requirements.
F. Degree 2 - Occasionally must coordinate work with
activities of others when sharing
vessels at sea.
G. Degree 1 - Must follow standard administrative
procedures.
|
|
|
Degree/
Points
|
Impact of Recommendations and
Activities
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Information and results of the work can affect
the conduct of other
ongoing departmental investigations or studies on marine
pollution.
B. ' Degree 2 -
(i) Degree 2 - Results of the work contribute to the
regulation of industrial waste
discharged in effluents necessitating changes in process
technology and
clean-up with corresponding economic effects on the industrial
process or
operation.
(ii) Degree 2 - Results of the work contribute to improving
and preserving the state
of the marine ecology of the Pacific region.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 2 - Information and results of the work contribute
to knowledge of the marine
ecology of the region and to improvements in methods and
technique used to identify
and measure the impact of industrial processes on marine
ecology.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
|
|
- Manager - Marine Programs
- Head, Microbiology Laboratory
- Senior, Marine Biologist - Surveillance
- Senior, Marine Biologist - Aquatic programs
* - Marine Biologist (BI-2)
- Supervisor, Field activities
* Bench-mark Position.
|
|
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 5
|
Level: 2
|
Descriptive Title: Park Ecologist
|
|
Reporting to the Chief Park Warden and
receiving scientific functional direction from the Chief, Natural
Resource Conservation at regional headquarters:
Plans, organizes and conducts ecological
surveys and studies within Terra Nova National Park to establish
inventories of plants and animal species relevant to park
management purposes. Collects and integrates data and information
for establishing and maintaining a computer based inventory of
park ecological data.
Establishes requirements for scientific
ecological studies, develops approaches and deals with standard
problems. Monitors natural resources and relates the changes to
the park ecology due to park development activities and pollution
phenomena such as acid rain and the use of pesticides. Develops
and recommends plans for implementation and monitoring of
measures to achieve park vegetation management objectives and
makes recommendations on methods and practices of park ecological
management and resources preservation.
Participates in the development of park
directives, guidelines and operational procedures and makes
recommendations to prevent, mitigate and reduce detrimental
ecological effects resulting from park operations and visitor
activities. Contributes to the development of the park brochures
and publications. Participates in the planning and implementation
of staff training. Contributes to the preparation of
specifications for contract work related to ecological management
of park resources. Provides advice, guidance and information on
matter's pertaining to the park ecology and ecological
management.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kind of Assignment
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Ecological study and other work objectives are
discussed, clarified and
agreed to with the Chief Park Warden and concurred by the
Chief, Natural Resource
Conservation.
B. Degree 2 - Several ecological surveys, studies or
projects are undertaken each year
within available resources and park management priorities.
C. Degree 2 - The activities include a number of related
scientific techniques such as
surveying, observing and identifying a wide variety of plant
and animal species,
analyzing their interrelationship and measuring the
detrimental effects of park
operations and human activities, on global park ecology.
D. Degree 2 - The work requires planning ecological studies
or surveys within time and
resource constraints, determining approaches and selecting
methods to ensure that
the work meets clearly defined park ecological management
objectives.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Ecological information and data is collected
by direct observation in the
park using established procedures and reference to
publications.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 2 - Information and data can normally be
validated by known procedures,
resampling and reference to literature on ecology.
C. Degree 2 - Ecological data is characterized by variables
requiring interpretation.
Implications of variables are usually known.
D. Degree 2 - Discrepancies in ecological observations can
usually be resolved by
straightforward investigations or repeating limited
surveys.
E. Degree 2 - Normally the work is affected by activities
of other park employees or
contractors and occasionally by the visiting public.
F. Degree 2 - Contacts consist mainly with other park
employees to obtain information
and discuss problems related to park ecological management
and, occasionally, with
other scientists in the field of ecology to discuss findings
and problems; and with
the public to provide information on Parks Canada Policy and
elements affecting park
ecology.
G. Degree 2 - The work requires adapting conventional
ecological management procedures
to suit conditions particular to park management activities.
Techniques for
measuring ecological changes in the park are modified as
applicable.
H. Degree 2 - The work requires a sound knowledge of ecology
and some familiarity with
park management practices and translocation of pollutants such
as acid rain and
pesticides and their effects on wildlife and vegetation.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 3 - Since this position is the only biologist
assigned to the Park, the work
is usually accepted as technically accurate and reviewed only
periodically for
consistency of recommendations and effectiveness of results in
terms of set
objectives.
B. Degree 2 - Professional guidance is available from the
Chief, Natural Resource
Conservation at regional headquarters, on new aspects of the
work or particular
problems.
C. Degree 2 - The work requires identifying specific
studies needed, recommending
vegetation management techniques, monitoring and operational
procedures to preserve
or enhance park ecology; and, to deal with normal ecological
problems encountered in
a park. environment.
D. Degree 3 - Recommendations of consultants in relation to
specific park ecological
projects are reviewed for applicability to park ecological
management.
E. Degree 2 - Own scientific observations and results are
interpreted to produce
meaningful conclusions and effective recommendations
concerning methods and
practices of park ecological management and resources
preservation.
F. Degree 2 - Advice is provided to the Chief Park Warden
and park staff on the impact
of park operations and development on plant vegetation and on
other matters related
to park ecology management. Makes recommendations concerning
preparation of park
interpretative brochures and other publications on plants and
wildlife of interest
in the park to inform the visiting public.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 1 - Occasionally, some survey or investigation
tasks are assigned to
non-subordinate park staff.
B. Degree 1 - The work requires planning own use of
supplies and of park equipment made
available for the work. .
C. Degree 2 - Identifies requirements for the services
related to ecological management
of park resources.
|
|
|
Degree
|
D. Degree 2 - Recommends the need for outside assistance to
implement urgent corrective
measures to prevent ecological damage in the park or for
carrying out on-going
monitoring and natural resources surveys.
E. Degree 2 - Ensures that work, fire prevention and safety
standards for own
responsibility are maintained.
F. Degree 2 - Occasionally required to coordinate study or
investigation work with
activities of park or outside contractor employees.
G. Degree 1 - Follows park administrative procedures and
safety practices.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and
Activities
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Information and results of the work affect
park management activities and
may limit access to certain areas.
B. Degree 2 -
i) Degree 2 - Recommendations or findings of the work
concerning potential
problems with rare and endangered species or wildlife diseases
and the closing
of a park or portion of a park can have local economic effect
on the tourist
industry.
ii) Degree 2 - Information and results are aimed at
conserving the environment of
the Terra Nova Park and affect the state of its flora and
fauna resources.
iii) No significant impact.
iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 2 - The work contributes to improvements in
methods and practices of park
ecological management and preservation of the environment.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
|
|
Park Superintendent
- Chief Park Warden Chief, Natural Resources
Conservation
(Regional Headquarters))
* - Park Ecologist (BI-2)--------------------- ;
- Park Wardens
(2)
- Assistant Chief
Park Warden
- Seasonal
Wardens (3)
- Wardens
(2)
- Tower
Attendants (3)
* Bench-mark position.
|
|
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 6
|
Level: 2
|
Descriptive Title: Anadromous Fish Biologist
|
|
Reporting to the Section Head, Salmon and Char Section:
Plans, organizes and conducts studies to
investigate the fresh water and marine life history,
distribution, ecology and population dynamics of Artic Char and
Atlantic Salmon stocks in the Newfoundland and Labrador river
systems. Conducts field population studies to estimate population
sizes of adults and juveniles of various stages in rivers, and
participates in research vessel cruises in the Labrador Sea to
collect data and investigate the marine life history phase,
migration routes and distribution of Artic Char stocks in these
areas. Supervises the field sampling of fish to determine age,
growth rates, food and feeding habits. Collects hydrologic,
hydrographic and meteorological data which affect the
environmental quality of the habitat, the supply of food and the
effect of these on population dynamics.
Analyses information and data, interprets
results and forecasts abundance of canadian stocks of Artic char
and Atlantic salmon in the region and estimates the likely
impacts of their commercial and recreational exploitation in
different areas. Participates on standing committees concerned
with fish stock management issues, providing scientific input on
the status of Artic char and Atlantic salmon in the Newfoundland
- Labrador region, and proposes regulation changes required to
sustain these renewable resources. Records and prepares reports
and articles on findings.
Supervises the work of full-time technical
assistants, and of seasonal employees when conducting field
studies in the summer months.
Specifications
|
Degree
|
Kind of Assignment
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Objectives of the work are clearly defined
with the Section Head in terms
of geographic areas or river systems to be surveyed,
guidelines and resource
available.
B. Degree 2 - The work requires carrying out a number of
detailed research projects or
studies involving field survey work in rivers and at sea
within resource limitations
each year, allocating work and providing advice.
C. Degree 2 - Activities involve collecting, analyzing and
interpreting information
from various geographic locations, on different species of
fish, to extrapolate
their population sizes using modeling and other techniques;
conducting required
field studies and investigations; allocating work and
providing advice.
D. Degree 3 - The field activities of study teams are
planned, organized and directed
to achieve objectives within established resource and time
limitations. Logistic
and support services arrangements are made and tasks are
assigned to members of the
study team and support staff.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Information and data on fish population is
obtained by sampling and
direct observation during field and vessel surveys utilizing
established sampling
techniques, analysis and statistical calculations.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 2 - Acceptable population estimates are usually
validated by known procedures
and comparison with results from other areas, previous work
and further field
studies.
C. Degree 2 - The information and data is obtained from
various regions, involves
several fish species and requires interpretation but
implications are
straightforward.
D. Degree 2 - Inconsistencies in results can usually be
resolved by re-sampling or
straightforward investigations. Relationship between variables
are normally well
known, hence modeling is a valid tool in estimating fish
populations.
E. Degree 2 - The work at sea requires planning and sharing
of ship and facilities and
requires consideration of activities of others outside the
organizational unit.
F. Degree 2 - Contacts are with other scientists and
officials within and outside the
organization unit to exchange information, discuss regulations
and with
representatives of commercial and sports fishing industry to
obtain fish species
harvest information.
G. Degree 2 - The work requires adapting and modifying data
collecting techniques and
investigation procedures to accommodate differences in survey
situations.
H. Degree 2 - The work requires a sound knowledge of fresh
water and marine biology and
some familiarity with hydrography, hydrology and
statistics.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 3 - The conclusions and recommendations provided
at the end of each fish
population studies are reviewed for soundness and
completeness, and work effectiveness is assessed by the
Section Head in terms of agreed goals and objectives.
B. Degree 2 - Guidance is available on new aspects of the
work or when problems are
encountered.
C. Degree 2 - The work requires identifying and resolving
problems usually encountered
in field survey situations.
D. Degree 2 - The work of subordinate staff is reviewed for
technical accuracy or
completion.
E. Degree 2 - The work requires the interpretation of
information, data and
calculations based on modeling and biometrics to produce
meaningful conclusions on
salmon and artic char fish populations.
F. Degree 3 - Advice is provided to colleagues and other
standing committee members in
regard to Artic char and Atlantic salmon population status in
the Newfoundland -
Labrador area.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - The work requires the supervision of
technicians and seasonal.
B. Degree 3 - The field and sea vessel survey operations
requires controlling the use
and maintenance of assigned equipment, supplies and
facilities.
C. Degree 2 - The work normally requires identifying
specific needs for new or
additional equipment, material, services and supplies well in
advance of planned
survey work.
D. Degree 2 - The need for outside assistance is normally
identified and recommended at
the time when objectives are agreed upon with the Section
Head.
E. Degree 2 - Ensures that work quality, quantity and safety
standards are maintained.
F. Degree 2 - Occasionally required to coordinate work
schedule to accommodate shared
facilities and equipment or vessel.
|
|
|
Degree
|
G. Degree 2 - Must follow and implement administrative
procedures established for the
work.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and
Activities
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Information and results of the work can
affect the orientation of studies
on other species and the formulation of regulations with
respect to Artic char or
Atlantic salmon in the region and the effectiveness of the
resource management
strategies.
B. Degree 2 -
i) Degree 2 - Results of the work can impact on the
harvest or practices of the
commercial and sports fishing industry in the area with a
corresponding
economic effect.
ii) Degree 2 - Results of the work contribute to the
conservation through
sustainable harvest of Artic char and Atlantic salmon as a
renewable resource.
iii) No significant impact.
iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 2 - Results of the work contribute to the
knowledge of the life history,
distribution, ecology and population dynamics of Artic char
and Atlantic salmon and
to improvements in methods and procedures in marine resource
management and
practices.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
|
|
Section Head, Salmon and Char Management
Section
- Research Scientist - Atlantic Salmon Population
Dynamics
- Technicians (3)
- Biologist - Salmon Stock Identification
- Technicians (2)
- Research Scientist - Atlantic Salmon
- Technician (1)
* - Anadromous Fish Biologist B1-2
- Technicians (2)
- Seasonals (2 p.y.)
* Bench-mark position
|
|
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 7
Level: 3 Descriptive Title: Wildlife Biologist - Migratory Birds
Reporting to the Head, Population Management Unit:
Plans, organizes and conducts field studies to assess the
annual status of key migratory waterfowl breeding populations in
a designated territory, usually a whole province, in order to
contribute scientifically valid information for the setting of
regional, national and north american waterfowl hunting
regulations and ensure the sustainable use and conservation of
this natural resource. Conducts special studies on endangered
species of migratory bird populations, their habitats, food
supply, migration routes and winter quarters in the U.S. or
Mexico, in order to recommend and promote measures to protect and
improve the status of the species. Participates as a member on
provincial, national and international waterfowl management
committees. Collaborates on wildlife conservation projects with
other public or private migratory bird management agencies, such
as Ducks Unlimited.
Designs and implements migratory birds banding studies to
determine mortality rate, temporal and spatial distribution of
certain species and flyways patterns and evaluates changes such
as those due to agriculture (loss of habitats), hunting and/or
other recreational activities. Collects and interprets hunter
success data in terms of species mortality rates and using
computer modelling, extrapolates harvest estimates for specific
areas, territories or province. Supervises one wildlife
technician and up to six casual and seasonal support staff.
Degree
Specifications
Kind of
Assignments
3
A. Degree 3 - Objectives of the work are broadly defined in
terms of determining annual population estimates of key waterfowl
species for a province or large territory for sustainability of
the resource and protection of the species.
B. Degree 3 - The work involves comprehensive
population studies over wide geographic areas involving many
different species of waterfowl.
C. Degree 2 - Activities are mainly related
to population dynamics and biometrics of waterfowl but also
include investigations of unusual events such as local increased
bird mortality incidents.
D. Degree 3 - Activities of subordinates
staff are planned and supervised to ensure that objectives are
met within time and resource constraints.
Complexity of
Work
3
A. Degree 3 - Information on population dynamics of the
species and data on migratory birds are often difficult to obtain
and interpret. Surveys are modeled on past practices and
guidelines but many field trips often under rigorous conditions
are required to document changes and data gaps which affect
predictability.
B. Degree 3 - Information and data can only
be validated by a combination of techniques and comparison with
results from other areas of the flyways.
C. Degree 3 - Information and data on
migratory birds are characterized by many variables due to
different feeding and migratory habits of different species, with
poorly defined variability and ambiguities.
|
Degree
|
D. Degree 3 - Relationships between variables affecting
migratory birds such as habitat,
mortality, climate, physiological factors, are difficult to
establish, can be
conflicting and require continuous investigations and
interpretation.
E. Degree 2 - The work is normally affected by other
scientists within the
organizational unit and occasionally by collaborators in other
provinces, the USA and
Mexico.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are frequent with scientists and
officials of other
governments and organizations to exchange information, resolve
problems and
establish cooperative projects.
G. Degree 2 - The work normally requires adapting techniques
and procedures to field
conditions.
H. Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of ornithology
(migratory waterfowl) and of a knowledge of pertinent
disciplines (ecology,
pathology, and of population dynamics) and, familiarity with
statistics and wildlife
management practices.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - As the waterfowl-wildlife expert for the
province or territory,
recommendations and conclusions are reviewed by the Head for
soundness of judgment
and attainment of work objectives.
B. Degree 3 - Professional guidance is received only for
the resolution of difficult
problems such as determining the cause of substantive
waterfowl population
fluctuations or significant mortality rates in birds of a
specific area.
C. Degree 3 - The field work requires sufficient autonomy
to define objectives,
identify problems and determine approaches for implementing
studies and resolving
problems.
D. Degree 3 - Results and reports of other scientists and
colleagues in the same
subject area are reviewed for validity and applicability to
Canadian Wildlife
Service programs.
E. Degree 2 - The work requires interpretation of own work
and data from related
studies to produce meaningful information, conclusions and
recommendations for
designated territory.
F. Degree 3 - Advice on migratory bird management practices
and techniques and on
population dynamics is provided to colleagues in other
designated territories or
provinces and to other scientists in the USA and Mexico.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - The work requires the supervision of one
technician and up to
six seasonal support staff.
B. Degree 2 - Ensures the proper use of facilities and
supplies and the proper
utilization and maintenance of the equipment allocated for
field work.
C. Degree 2 - The work requires determining the equipment,
material and services
required and planning and scheduling the use of shared
equipment, material and
services.
D. Degree 3 - The work requires substantiating the need for
outside contract work and
arranging for readily available assistance.
E. Degree 2 - Ensures that own and support staff's work
meet safety and departmental
work standards.
F. Degree 3 - The work often requires coordinating
activities with those of provincial
and U.S. Wildlife colleagues.
G. Degree 2 - Follows and implements office and field
administrative procedures
applicable to the work.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Impact of Recommendations and
Activities
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Recommendations and advice contribute to the
formulation of guidelines
and hunting regulations and the direction of projects or
studies in the subject area
of work.
B. Degree 3 -
i) Degree 2 - Recommendations on regulations impact on the
hunting industry in the
designated area.
ii) Degree 3 - The mission of the work is to provide
results and advice which will
help preserve a natural resource, namely migratory birds.
iii) No significant impact.
iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - Findings and results of comprehensive
investigations required contribute
primarily to improved knowledge in waterfowl population
dynamics and management
techniques.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
|
|
- Regional Director
- Chief,-Migratory Bird Research and Management
Division
- Head, Habitat Conservation
- Head Conservation and Enforcement
- Manager, Northern Operations
- Head - Population Management Unit
- Wildlife Biologist BI-3
- Wildlife Biologist BI-2
- Wildlife Biologists BI-3
- Wildlife Biologist BI-3
- Wildlife Technician (EG-ESS-7)
* - Wildlife Biologist - Migratory Bird BI-3
- Wildlife Technician (EG-ESS-7)
- Seasonal Support Staff (up to 6)
* Bench-mark Position.
|
|
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 8
|
Level: 3
|
Descriptive Title: Plant Pathology Biologist
|
|
Reporting to the Head, Pathology Section of
the Vineland Research Station:
Conducts studies and investigations on the
pathogenicity, etiology, epithytology and biological control of
fungal pathogens causing diseases of fruit crops, with emphasis
on grapes.
Determines the occurrence and relative
importance of spores, mycelium as well as the identity of
pathogenic and saprophytic fungi occurring under Ontario
conditions, using a compound light microscope and standard tests
for pathogenicity. Determines the effect of inoculum
concentration, temperature and humidity upon lesion development
and degree of sporulation, utilizing potted plants or harvested
fruits under controlled environments. Collects data on inoculum
levels and host infections by periodically sampling air,
rain-water, soil and plant tissues, as a basis for developing
predictive models based on accumulated seasonal and historic
weather data.
Conducts studies to determine the fungicidal,
prophylactic, therapeutic and antisporulative activity of
fungicides under laboratory and field conditions. Directs field
experiment to compare the efficacy of unregistered fungicides
with standard registered fungicides at recommended spray
interval, to assist in the evaluation process of pesticides.
Determines, in cooperation with a residue chemist, the rate of
degradation of the fungicide on fruit crops and the coincident
decline of biological activity for recommended pre-harvest
intervals and allowable residue levels. Determines the
phytotoxicity of various rates of fungicide and mixtures of
fungicides on different fruit and cultivars.
Provides information and advice to growers, officials and
scientists in other federal and provincial agencies on fungal
diseases occurring and the recommended fungicide use
strategies.
Prepares papers on fungus disease and fungicide use and
efficacy study findings for publication in scientific and trade
journals.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kind of Assignments
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - The areas and objectives of studies and
investigations for preventing or
dealing with fruit crop diseases are established following
identification and in
discussions with the Section Head.
B. Degree 3 - The work involves comprehensive studies on
fungal diseases of tree fruits
and investigations on the use and efficacy of fungicides to
prevent or control
damage to fruit crops with emphasis on grapes.
C. Degree 2 - The work involves identifying and monitoring
the prevalence of fungal
diseases in the area, measuring their resistance to fungicide,
assisting in
evaluating the efficacy of new fungicides and providing advice
to departmental
officers and growers.
D. Degree 3 - The work requires planning studies and
investigations, developing or
modifying experimental approaches, developing predictive
models and effective
control procedures, directing field experiments, assigning
tasks and ensuring that
objectives are met within established guidelines.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Complexity of Work
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Information and data on fungal diseases of
grapes and fruit trees and on
the use and efficacy of fungicides for their control is
obtained by detailed field
and laboratory investigations and by interpretation. Sources
which include plant,
fruit, air, soil and incidence of diseases are temperature and
moisture dependent.
B. Degree 2 - Information and data can normally be
validated by repeated
experimentations and using known procedures, previous
investigation data, and
references to scientific literature.
C. Degree 3 - Information and data are characterized by
many types of fungal diseases
and varying degrees of resistance to fungicides, compounded by
temperature and
moisture variations, activities and phytoxicity of various
rate of fungicides and of
mixtures, and many types and varieties of host fruit trees and
grapes.
D. Degree 3 - Relationships among the variables are not
straightforward and require
investigations and interpretation to understand.
E. Degree 3 - The direction of studies is frequently
affected by requests for
collaboration from scientists in industry or Pesticide
Registration officers to
evaluate new or proposed fungicides under field conditions and
by request from
growers for advice or guidance.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with research scientists from
other stations, the province
of Ontario, representatives of fruit marketing board, winery
officials and fruit
growers to discuss the efficacy of fungicides, the assessment
and use of new ones
and problems related to fungal disease and control or to
initiate cooperative
projects.
G. Degree 3 - The work requires developing experimental
approaches, monitoring
procedures, devising diagnostic tests, modifying techniques
and procedures to deal
with fruit crop disease problems and to meet objectives.
H. Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of mycology and
plant pathology as well as some statistics for handling field
and laboratory data,
and familiarity with techniques of evaluation of fungicides in
the field.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Work approaches, conclusions and
recommendations on fungal disease and on
phytotoxicity and efficacy of fungicides are reviewed for
soundness of judgment and
in terms of contributing to objectives of the pathology
section.
B. Degree 3 - Receives minimal guidance in own area of
specialization. Guidance can be
obtained for the resolution of difficult problems.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires identifying major fungal
disease problems of fruit
crops and fruit trees in Ontario, with emphasis on grapes,
identifying potential
areas and objectives of investigations, determining strategy
and approaches to deal
with the disease before widespread crops damages results.
D. Degree 3 - The work of other scientists working on fungi
and fungicides is reviewed
for applicability to own work. The work of subordinate staff
is reviewed while in
progress in the field for accuracy and on completion for
compliance with standards
and guidelines.
E. Degree 3 - Own and subordinate staff's observations and
results of field
investigations are interpreted to produce meaningful results
and recommendations on
the best fungicide to use against occurring fungi of the
season. The work and
findings of other scientists are interpreted to determine
their meaning and
implications on the severity of fungal outbreaks in other
areas and particular
fungicide resistance.
|
|
|
Degree
|
F. Degree 3 - Advice and recommendations are provided to
colleagues and immediate
superior, and advice and guidance on grape diseases, fungicide
use strategies and on
the efficacy of fungicides under field conditions, is provided
to horticultural
specialists, fruit growers, winery representatives, chemical
companies and officials
in federal and provincial pesticides authorities.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - The work requires the supervision of a
full-time technician and of
casuals as assistants.
B. Degree 2 - Ensures that field and laboratory equipment,
supplies and facilities
allocated for the work are used properly.
C. Degree 2 - Identifies the need for field and laboratory
equipment, material and
services for conducting investigations and study work.
D. Degree 2 - Recommends on the need for assistance to
supervisor.
E. Degree 2 - Ensures that safety and work guidelines,
quality and other standards are
maintained.
F. Degree 2 - Occasionally coordinates work with residue
chemist and others sharing
equipment or facilities.
G. Degree 2 - Implements and follows normal administrative
procedures.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and
Activities
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice, efficacy assessments
of fungicides and results
of the work affect the intensity and direction of research
activity in one or more
research stations in Ontario, and contribute to the
formulation of guidelines and
regulations on the use of fungicides.
B. Degree 3
(i) Degree 3 - Results of the work form the basis of
recommendations to the fruit
and grape industry in Ontario and consequently have economic
or technological
effects in reducing damage to crops due to fungal disease.
(ii) Degree 2 - Information, results and recommendations
contribute to the approval
and use of fungicide with respect to efficacy to protect and
enhance fruit
crops.
(iii) No significant direct impact.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - The investigations and interpretations of
scientific information provide
knowledge and an improved understanding of fungal diseases and
their control using
fungicides and other biological control procedures.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Head, Plant Pathology Section, Vineland Research Station
- Research Scientists (5)
- Technicians (6)
* - Plant Pathology Biologist (BI-3)
- Technician
- Casual
Summer Assistants (4) (Sciences student; CLT)
* Bench-mark Positions.
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 9
|
Level: 3
|
Descriptive Title: Insecticide Evaluation Biologist
|
|
Reporting to the Associate Director - Insecticide Evaluation -
Product Management Division:
Reviews complete pre-market evaluation
submissions for new products or new uses of registered products
from the pesticide industry, for completeness and acceptance
against standards criteria and evaluation protocols required
under the Pest Control Act and Regulations. Ensures that proposed
conditions of manufacture, storage, display, distribution and
utilization conform with legal requirements for safety, merit,
value, purity, potency and efficacy. Reviews and assesses all
data for validity and acceptability with respect to agricultural
legislation and distributes relevant portions of the submissions
to specialists in Health and Welfare, Environment and Fisheries
and Oceans for their evaluation and assessment against their
respective Acts and Regulations.
Reviews and consolidates evaluation or assessment reports
received from specialists in agriculture and the above
departments and establishes a consensus in consultation with them
in order to prepare a global assessment on the degree of risk to
human and non-target species of animals, birds and insects as
well as any potential risk to land or aquatic environments. If
additional data is required to complete any or all of the above
risk assessment, informs industry of the additional requirements
and the rationale as well as the test protocols required to
complete the evaluation. Reports findings to the supervisor and
recommends acceptance or rejection of the application for
registration of the product based on the global assessment
results.
Participates in the planning of departmental research projects
to extend the use of registered pesticides for use on minor crops
for which no supporting data exists. Recommends appropriate field
studies to monitor the safety of residue levels of pesticides
resulting from approved use levels and application
frequencies.
Provides advice to officers of other federal
or provincial agencies as well as industry on the requirements
and implications of existing, new or amended legislation
affecting the use of Pesticides in Canada.
Specifications
|
Degree
|
Kind of Assignments
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Objectives of the work are defined in terms of
assignments involving the
evaluation of a number of pre-market evaluation submissions
concurrently. Project
goals are expressed in terms of timely and well founded
recommendations for the
approval or rejection of applications for registration of
pesticides.
B. Degree 3 - The extent of the work involves an exhaustive
examination, analysis and
critical evaluation of data within the specialized subject
area of scientific
evaluation of insecticides for the safe, effective and legal
use of pest control
products in Canada.
C. Degree 3 - Assessment or evaluation activities require
the use of a wide variety of
scientific techniques for the investigation of the
composition, performance or
effects of a wide range of pesticides on agricultural and
ecological systems, and
the provision of sound advice.
|
|
|
Degree
|
D. Degree 3 - Pre-market submission evaluation requires
planning and organizing work to
resolve a broad diversity of problems or conflicting interests
in priorities and
attitudes, in coordinating the views of industry and four
departments to ensure that
sound decisions are made within established precedents,
standards and guidelines
prescribed under the Control Products Acts and
Regulations.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - While a great deal of information is supplied
in pre-market submissions,
critical information is often missing or incomplete or biased.
More information
must often be requested at great cost to industry or
occasionally industry is simply
reluctant to disclose trade secrets or propriety
information.
B. Degree 3 - The information and data supplied by industry
can normally be validated
by a combination of experimentation and detailed literature
referencing.
C. Degree 4 - The information and data contained in the
submissions can be characterized
by variability, many variables, difficulty of interpretation
and the need for
judgment to use the data in assessing safety and efficacy.
D. Degree 3 - Relationships between variables such as
safety, merit, value and-efficacy
can be conflicting and require careful investigation and
interpretation.
E. Degree 4 - Work is normally affected by the activities of
specialists in other
departments or agencies and require full consideration of the
implication of their
activities and conclusions on the global assessment
process.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists and officials of
industry and other
departments or agencies and legal counsel to obtain and
exchange information,
resolve problems and provide advice. May explain legal aspects
of the work and
exchange information with the public and the media.
G. Degree 3 - The work requires adapting or developing new
protocols and procedures
using known approaches and existing precedents to deal with
the evaluation of new
products or new use patterns or spray calendars for
pesticides.
H. Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the
principles, theories and practices of biology with emphasis on
toxicology, and
pathology and familiarity with the practices of chemical
residue analysis.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Evaluation work, approaches, recommendations
and conclusions are
periodically reviewed for soundness of judgment and attainment
of assignment
objectives.
B. Degree 3 - Professional guidance is only received
for assistance in resolving
difficult protocol related problems, and resolving differences
in data requirements
with industry or advisors.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires evaluating submitted studies
and experiments and
dealing with problems such as incomplete or missing data and
biased information and
conclusions. Work requires developing appropriate
protocols.
D. Degree 3 - Within own subject area, the results and
findings of other scientists are
reviewed for appropriateness in assessing the global merit of
pre-market submissions
for the registration of new pesticides.
E. Degree 3 - Toxicological data and assessments or
conclusions of scientists from four
departments are interpreted and collated into a global
assessment of the work under
review.
F. Degree 3 - Specific technical advice and guidance within
own subject area is
provided to other scientists and officials in industry and
other
departments/agencies.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Management Responsibility
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - The work may occasionally require assigning
work to non-subordinate
staff.
B. Degree 1 - Responsibility for the control of physical
resources is limited to the
day-to-day use of office equipment and supplies for own
work.
C. Degree 1 - Responsibility for committing departmental
resources is generally limited
to the spending of own time and use of office equipment for
own work.
D. Degree 2 - Responsibility for obtaining outside assistance
other than formal
agreements with other federal agencies is done through
recommendation on the need
for assistance to the supervisor.
E. Degree 1 - Responsibility for the administrative control
of work is limited to
complying with administrative procedures and guidelines
established for the work.
F. Degree 3 - There is a very definite requirement for the
administrative coordination
of own activities with those of other scientists from the
other departments or
agencies involved.
G. Degree 1 - Responsible for following straightforward
office administrative
procedures.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and
Activities
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Recommendations and advice impact on the
operation of the Pesticide
Directorate and corresponding units in other federal
departments involved in the
evaluation of pesticides, the formulation of guidelines,
regulations, specifications
or precedents and standards related to pesticides use in
Canada.
B. Degree 3
(i) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the work
can have economic or
technological effects on the production, sale, distribution
and use of
pesticides in Canada.
(ii) Degree 2 - Recommendation, advice and results of the work
have a contributing
effect on the state of natural resources and management
practices.
(iii) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and
results of the work affect the approval
and use of pesticides with respect to efficacy and safety and
the regulatory
control of potentially hazardous products or substances.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - Information and results of the work contribute
to improvements in
protocols and procedures associated with the evaluation of
pesticide products. The
evaluation of the scientific material submitted and the
results of the work
contribute directly to greater knowledge and improved
understanding of the
pesticides, their use, effectiveness and associated risks.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director General - Pesticides Directorate
- Director, Product Compliance Division
- Director, Information Secretariat
- Director, Issues, Planning and
Priority
- Director, Product Management Division
- Associate Director, Antimicrobial
Section
- Associate Director, Herbicide Section
- Associate Director, Fungicide Section
- Associate Director - Insecticide
Evaluation
* - Insecticide Evaluation Biologists (3) BI-3
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 10
|
Level: 3
|
Descriptive Title: Pesticide Evaluation Biologist
|
|
Reporting to a Senior Evaluation Officer of
the Pesticide Division:
Conducts a thorough assessment of all pertinent information
contained in assigned portions of pre-market submissions for
pesticides to determine their acceptability for new or continuing
registration under the Pest Control Products Act, administered by
Agriculture Canada and more specifically from the view point of
environmental legislation.
Ensures that the proposed conditions of
manufacture, storage, distribution, transportation and
utilization of the pesticide conform with legal requirements for
the safety and preservation of the environment. Reviews and
assesses all data for validity and acceptability with respect to
environmental legislation and requests additional information if
required to complete the assessment through consultation with
officers of Agriculture Canada and the pesticide industry.
Maintains confidentiality of propriety industrial information
where required.
Discusses proposed recommendations with the supervisor and
prepares an official departmental recommendation and rationale
for acceptance or rejection of the submission request.
Conducts assessments of applications for
special research permits to carry out limited field experiments
with unregistered pesticides proposed as candidate replacement of
alternatives to existing pesticides. Consults with regional
officers from areas where experiments are proposed and ensures
that every precautions are incorporated into the experiments to
prevent or minimize potential environmental damage. Provides the
department of agriculture with an integrated assessment of the
project and recommendations for improving the project from an
environmental stand-point.
Provides advice and information to officers of
other government departments/agencies and industry on the
persistence and mobility of pesticide residues in the environment
and their potential for bioaccumulation or their potential effect
on non-target organisms; and on the requirements and implications
of existing, new or proposed environmental legislation affecting
the use of pesticides in Canada.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Objectives of the work are defined in terms of
numbers of assignments
involving the concurrent evaluation of several submissions.
Project goals are
expressed in terms of quality and timeliness of
recommendations to Agriculture
Canada.
B. Degree 3 - The work consists of projects or studies
involving the comprehensive
evaluation or assessment of large quantities of data on the
toxicity, distribution,
mobility, degradation and effects of pesticides in the
environment.
C. Degree 3 - Pesticide assessment or evaluation for
detrimental effects on the
environment, requires the use of a wide variety of scientific
techniques to
investigate the potential exposure of non-target biological
organisms in a broad
range of ecological systems and climatic conditions and for
the provision of sound advice.
|
|
|
Degree
|
D. Degree 3 - Detailed evaluation of pertinent portions of
pesticide submissions for
environmental impact requires planning and conducting a broad
diversity of work to
ensure that all facets of the potential exposures of living
organisms and accumulation or degradation of pesticides
under evaluation have been fully considered within established
guidelines of the environmental legislation.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Although a lot of data and information
required in assessing the
environmental acceptability of a pesticide is supplied in the
application for
registration submission, some critical information is often
missing or incomplete
or biased. Additional information must often be obtained from
industry or from
literature but is often difficult to obtain and interpret.
B. Degree 3 - The information and data supplied by industry
can normally be validated
by a combination of experimentation and detailed literature
referencing.
C. Degree 4 - The information and data contained in
submissions can be characterized by
variability, many variables, difficulty of interpretation and
some ambiguity, and
require interpretation and judgment to use the data to
determine the environmental
acceptability of a pesticide.
D. Degree 3 - Relationships between variables such as,
toxicity, persistence, mode of
application, mobility and bioaccumulation can be conflicting
and require careful
consideration and interpretation or further investigation.
E. Degree 3 - The work is frequently affected by requests
from other specialists of
other departments for special permits to use unregistered
pesticides for testing
purposes. The toxicity evaluation by Health and Welfare
scientists must be taken
into consideration for environmental assessment and
consistency.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists and officials of
industry and other
departments to obtain and exchange information, resolve
differences or problems and
provide advice. May explain some legal aspects of the work and
exchange information
with the public and the media.
G. Degree 3 - The work requires adapting or developing
innovative procedures or new
protocols to improve the evaluation process using known
approaches and existing
precedents especially when dealing with new or diverse
geographic areas and climatic
conditions.
H. Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the
principles, theories and practices of biology with emphasis on
toxicology,
environmental ecology, and familiarity with the practices of
pesticide residue
analysis and degradation process.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - The evaluation work, approaches,
recommendations and conclusions are
periodically reviewed for soundness of judgment and attainment
of assignment
objectives.
B. Degree 3 - Professional guidance is only received for
assistance in resolving
difficult protocol related problems with industry.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires defining the objectives to
be attained for each
submission evaluation to ensure that all environmental aspects
have been considered
and potential problems identified and resolved.
D. Degree 3 - The results and findings of other scientists
are reviewed for
appropriateness in assessing the impact of pesticide on the
environment.
|
|
|
Degree
|
E. Degree 3 - Environmental toxicology data from industry
and assessments or
conclusions of other departmental scientists are interpreted
and rationalized to
determine the most accurate environmental impact of the
pesticides under review.
F. Degree 3 - Specific technical or legal related advice or
guidance within the subject
area of evaluation of pesticides and their environmental
impact is provided to other
scientists or officials in industry, in own and other
departments/agencies.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - The work may occasionally require assigning
work to non-subordinate
staff.
B. Degree 1 - Responsibility for the control of physical
resources is limited to the
day-to-day use of office equipment and supplies for own
work.
C. Degree 1 - Responsibility for committing departmental
resources is generally limited
to the spending of own time and use of office equipment for
own work.
D. Degree 2 - Responsibility for obtaining outside
assistance other than formal
agreements with other federal agencies is done through
recommendation on the need
for assistance to the supervisor.
E. Degree 1 - Responsibility for the administrative control
of work is limited to
complying with administrative procedures and guidelines
established for the work.
F. Degree 3 - There is a very definite requirement for the
administrative coordination
of own activities with those of other scientists from the
other departments/agencies
involved.
G. Degree 1 - Responsible for following straightforward
office administrative
procedures.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and evaluation results
affect the formulation of
guidelines, regulations, protocols and standards for
pesticides and the conduct of
experiments with pesticides in Canadian environments.
B. Degree 3 -
i) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the
work can have an economic
or technological effect on the production, sale, distribution
and use of
pesticides in Canada.
ii) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the
work are aimed at the
preservation of the environment and safe environmental
management practices
with pesticides.
iii) Degree 2 - Recommendations, advice and results of the
work on the environmental
impact have a contributory effect on the approval and use of
pesticides with
respect to safety.
iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - The evaluation of the scientific data and
information submitted and
results of the work contribute directly to a greater knowledge
and improved
understanding of pesticides and their associated risks on the
environment.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Chief, Pesticide Division
- Senior Evaluation Officer
- Senior Evaluation Officer
* - Pesticide Evaluation Biologists (2) BI-3
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION
DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 11
|
Level: 3
|
Descriptive Title: Salmon Assessment Biologist
|
|
Reporting to the Head, Stock Assessment and
Enhancement Section:
Plans, organizes and conducts field studies, investigations,
and analysis of Atlantic salmon and habitat on Cape Breton Island
to provide a scientific basis for assessment and derivation of
salmon stock management alternatives. Conducts field studies and
investigations on selected watersheds for Atlantic salmon to
determine production potential and collects population data on
salmon population for stock assessments. Conducts biological
studies, collects and analyses samples and data for determining
sex ratios, gonad development, age, differential growth rates,
bio-chemical, genetic and disease studies;
and, to evaluate the variability in freshwater
survival due to species competition and epizootic diseases.
Initiates and conducts projects or
investigation studies and determines approaches and implements
techniques for the rehabilitation/enhancement of the salmon stock
of a river system. Identifies and proposes investigations to
determine marine mechanisms affecting mortality/survival of
Atlantic salmon.
Specifies sport and commercial statistical
data to be collected by fisheries officers. Analyzes data and tag
return for changes in trends and assessments of river and
spawning escapements and loss of salmon stock to fishing
mortality. Develops mathematical models to estimate and predict
salmon production of a river system.
Develops and presents recommendations to Divisional
Management, River Management Committee and private and commercial
groups, for regulatory control changes in harvest level and
provides advice to ensure sustainable harvest level.
Contributes, as a core member of the
Scientific Advisory Sub-Committee or other working groups, to the
planning of scientific studies and preparation of papers
pertaining to the status of Atlantic salmon stock and improved
methods for predicting salmon stock levels.
Administers allocated operating budget funds; supervises
technical support staff; and, prepares reports and publishes new
findings concerning salmon stock in Cape Breton Island.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kind of Assignments
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Objectives of assignments are defined in terms
of improving the Atlantic
Salmon stock in the region and ensuring sustained harvest at
desirable levels.
Annual goals are agreed to in terms of available
resources.
B. Degree 3 - The work involves comprehensive investigations
to determine, develop and
enhance the salmon production of selected watersheds and to
establish sustainable
harvesting levels.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires collecting and analyzing
information from different
locations; conducting field investigations on salmon stock
strengths, habitat
suitability, watershed potential production; assessing actual
and potential
populations and harvest level; using modeling techniques;
developing techniques to
enhance or rehabilitate sub-standard production levels on
selected rivers; and,
supervising staff.
|
|
|
Degree
|
D. Degree 3 - The activities of a study or project team are
planned and directed and,
projects are initiated and conducted to achieve objectives
within established
resource and time constraints.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Information on biological and environmental
data and factors affecting
salmon population, inventory, production and strength
assessment at various stages,
escapement, survival and mortality, watersheds habitat quality
for production
potential, requires obtaining by investigation, data which is
often difficult to
obtain, interpret and select.
B. Degree 3 - Information and data to determine salmon river
potentials can normally be
validated by a combination of field investigations and
previous studies or findings
and correlations, experimentations and detailed literature
referencing.
C. Degree 3 - Information and data on population dynamics
are characterized by several
variables requiring interpretation and often present some
ambiguity.
D. Degree 3 - Relationships between variables are sometimes
conflicting and require
investigation and interpretation, such as to explain a decline
in population when
fishing is restricted.
E. Degree 2 - Work is normally affected by others within the
unit and occasionally by
the activities of others outside the unit, such as provincial
officials and wardens
on collaborative projects to rehabilitate or enhance salmon
production.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with provincial scientists and
officials outside the
organization unit to resolve problems, exchange information,
provide guidance or for
participating in cooperative projects and sub-committee
work.
G. Degree 3 - The work requires exploring and developing new
techniques for assessing
abundance of salmon stock, streamlining the acquisition of
stream habitat
inventories, developing new devices and techniques to measure
the salmon production
potential of watersheds and productions enhancing procedures
suitable for river's
particular conditions, and for measuring and recording
watershed data.
H. Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the
principle, theories and practices of biology and ecology with
emphasis on the North
Atlantic Salmon in all stages of its life-cycle, and
familiarity with hydrography and
hydrology practices for physical measurement of watersheds and
with biometric
practices and the use of computers for modeling purposes.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - The approaches and recommendations of
completed investigations are
reviewed by the supervisor for soundness and in terms of
attainment of objectives.
B. Degree 3 - Professional guidance is normally received
only for the resolution of
difficult problems such as those affecting salmon stock and
sustainable harvesting
level.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires identifying problems with
certain rivers, defining
objectives and determining approaches to resolve salmon
decline by applying
innovative solutions and recommending changes in scientific
based controls.
D. Degree 3 - The work of subordinate staff is reviewed for
completeness and compliance
with standards and guidelines. Related work by other
scientists is reviewed for
synthesis of concepts and applicability.
E. Degree 3 - Scientific data or work results and
recommendations of own staff are
reviewed for significance. Investigation findings of other
scientists are reviewed
and interpreted for applicability or implication on
rehabilitation and enhancement
of salmon production, potential of certain watersheds of the
region, sustainable
level of harvest and salmon fishery regulations.
|
|
|
Degree
|
F. Degree 3 - Advice is provided to colleagues and superior
on own work. Scientific
guidance is provided to support staff, contributors and
officials on regulation
changes or projects to enhance salmon production of certain
rivers or, to ensure
sustainable harvesting level.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - The work requires the supervision of a
technical support staff comprising
technician, sciences students, programmer and field
laborers.
B. Degree 2 - Ensures proper use of equipment, supplies and
facilities allocated for
the work.
C. Degree 2 - Determines the requirements for supplies,
equipment and facilities for
study/investigation projects.
D. Degree 2 - Identifies and recommends to the supervisor on
the need for outside
assistance on specific field studies.
E. Degree 2 - Ensures that safety, quality and other work
and performance standards are
maintained.
F. Degree 3 - Coordinates study activities with those of
others scientist working in
conjunction on cooperative projects or ad-hoc committees, and
with area fisheries and
provincial officers.
G. Degree 2 - Must implement field and other administrative
procedures established for
the work.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the
work can affect the intensity
and orientation of salmon stock and fisheries research
activities of the department;
the assessments and analysis of the work results are used in
the formulation of
harvest regulations, the initiation of salmon enhancement
activities and the
derivation of salmon stock management alternatives for certain
rivers of the region.
B. Degree 3 -
(i) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the work
involve salmon stock
enhancement and harvest level and have economic impact on the
sport and
commercial salmon fishing activities.
(ii) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the
work affect the state of
the salmon stock and effectiveness of the salmon river
management practices.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - The investigation, inventorying and the
assessments of salmon stock and
habitats, and improved procedures to enhance the reproduction
of salmon in selected
rivers, provide new knowledge and a better understanding of
salmon population
dynamics.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
- Chief, Freshwater and Anadromous Fish Division
Head, Stocks Assessment and Enhancement Section
* - Salmon Assessment Biologist, BI-3
- Technician
- Terms/Seasonals (3)
(Programmer, University Sciences Students and Field
Laborer)
* Bench-mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 12
|
Level: 3
|
Descriptive Title: Lake Enrichment Biologist
|
|
Reporting to the Head, Enrichment Research
Section:
Plans, organizes and conducts limnological
investigations in the laboratory and field to determine the
trophy status of approximately 15 sockeye salmon nursery lakes in
British Columbia and Yukon, to increase salmon production through
the application of appropriate levels of nutrient
fertilizers.
Designs and conducts field and laboratory
studies to determine the nutrient requirement of the
phytoplankton species present in each lake through the collection
of a wide range of synoptic data and nutrient competition
experiments.
Determines the work and prescribes technical
specifications and skill requirements for laboratory and field
survey contract work. Reviews and certifies that contract work
performed meets quality control, safety, other work standards and
contract specifications and recommends payment.
Determines each lake's suitability for
fertilization by analyzing and interpreting the information and
data obtained, identifies and recommends lakes where
fertilization would be most effective in terms of salmon
production, calculates the appropriate fertilizer composition,
loading rate and frequency for each suitable lake, and obtains
appropriate permits from the Provincial authorities.
Monitors fertilized lakes, through the
analysis of data on levels of growth and survival
of juvenile sockeye salmon.
Advises colleagues and superior on new aspects
of the work.
Writes reports and scientific papers and presents findings to
scientific community. Supervises subordinate technical support
staff including several seasonal employees.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kind of Assignments
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - The enhancement of sockeye salmon in the
Pacific region is the main thrust
of the work. Objectives are defined in broad term by the Head
of the Section to
support general objectives of the Research Branch. Annual
goals are agreed to with
the supervisor in terms of how many lakes will be studied in
the year within
allocated resources.
B. Degree 3 - The work involves comprehensive investigations
in the specialized area of
lake ecology and natural nutrient levels to support the
sockeye salmon's food
sources.
C. Degree 3 - Activities include planning, organizing and
controlling studies of a
variety of unfertilized lakes and determining through the
interpretation of collected
data if a lake is a good candidate for the addition of
fertilizers and assessing the
effects of additions on salmon production rates.
|
|
|
Degree
|
D. Degree 3 - The work requires preparing proposals for
future work and approval,
planning and assigning work to own staff and controlling
contract work to ensure that
objectives are met within established guidelines and resource
allocations.
|
|
Complexity of work
|
|
A. Degree 3 - The work requires obtaining by investigation,
biological, chemical and-
physical data which are difficult to collect in that most
lakes are in remote areas,
samples are perishable and easily contaminated and laboratory
analysis of
phytoplankton is difficult and variable.
B. Degree 3 - Information and data can only be validated by
the application of rigorous
quality control and innovative experimentation, correlation
with other studies, or
detailed literature referencing.
C. Degree 3 - Information and data on each lake involve
variables such as hydrologic
flux, thermoclines, daily insolation, water chemistry,
phytoplankton community
structure and biomass which must be thoroughly understood
before enhancement of
salmon is possible.
D. Degree 3 - The relationships of the biological, chemical
and physical variables are
complex, sometimes conflicting and require detailed analysis
or further
experimentation and interpretation.
E. Degree 2 - The work is normally affected by the
activities of contract staff whose
activities must be closely monitored and coordinated and
occasionally by the
activities of others such as hatchery managers and provincial
biologists.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists within and
outside the organization to reach
agreement on the fertilizer application strategy, obtain
provincial authorization,
and meet citizens groups concerned with the operation.
G. Degree 3 - The varied nature of each lake under study
requires the development of
innovative solutions to resolve specific problems and involves
developing new, or
modifying and adapting standard practices, techniques and
procedures.
H. Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of limnology
and familiarity with marine ecology, salmon biology, fisheries
management and
biometrics.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Work approaches and recommendations of
completed studies are reviewed by
the superior for soundness of judgment and in terms of
attainment of objectives.
B. Degree 3 - Minimal direction is provided. Guidance is
available for the resolution
of difficult problems from discussion with Section Head or
with other professional
in similar fields.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires setting specific objectives
of studies for own and
contract work; establishing quality control standards for
field and laboratory
activities; determining approaches to resolve difficult
problems within the subject
area of limnology.
D. Degree 3 - The work of subordinate and contract project
team members is reviewed for
completeness and compliance to contract specifications, and
other work standards.
The work of other scientists is reviewed for applicability to
own subject area.
E. Degree 3 - Complex biological, chemical and physical
data, results and conclusions,
of subordinate and contract staff are interpreted to determine
their meaning and
implication on work activities.
F. Degree 3 - Advice is provided to colleagues and
immediate superior within own subject
area. Explanations of findings are given and guidance on
scientific matters related
to salmon production in lakes is provided to other
scientists working in related
areas.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Management Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - The work requires the supervision of permanent
and seasonal support
staff.
B. Degree 2 - Ensures proper use of allocated equipment,
supplies and facilities.
C. Degree 3 - Recommends the acquisition of equipment,
material or services to meet
work requirements and recommends payment for contract work
performed.
D. Degree 3 - Substantiates the need for outside assistance
on contract, identifying
requirements and source of assistance and arranging for the
selection of suitable
qualified resource persons for the work assignments to be
carried out.
E. Degree 3 - The work requires implementing quality
assurance, performance measurement
and safety procedures to contract and own staff, to meet the
unit's objectives.
F. Degree 2 - The work requires occasional coordination of
activities with those of
other units, when sharing equipment or facilities.
G. Degree 2 - Implements office and field administration
procedures.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the
work impact on the direction
and intensity of research projects on lake enrichment programs
and departmental
policies for sockeye salmon enhancement.
B. Degree 3 -
(i) Degree 2 - Results of the work have some economic impacts
on the fishing and
sports fishing industries.
(ii) Degree 3 - Results of the work, recommendations and
advice affect the state of
a natural resource, the sockeye salmon, and the environmental
management
practices for freshwater lakes in British Columbia and the
Yukon.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No other external impacts.
C. Degree 3 - The investigation, analysis and
interpretation of limnological
information of sockeye salmon hatchery lakes provide knowledge
and improved
understanding of this subject area.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART Head, Enrichment
Research Section - Research Scientist, ultra-plankton
- Research Scientist, Lake enrichment
- Biologists (3)
- Technicians (2)
* - Lake Enrichment Biologist - BI-3
- Technician
- Seasonal
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 13
|
Level: 3
|
Descriptive Title: Specialist, Food Microbiology
|
|
Reporting to the Head, Food Microbiology
Unit:
Conducts studies and leads project teams to
develop, validate and apply new or improved methods for the
isolation, identification, enumeration and confirmation of
microbial organisms and their toxins of sanitary and health
hazard significance in a wide range of food products, and in
particular low acid foods in hermetically sealed containers, to
ensure the availability of reliable methods for laboratory
operations and for inclusion in the Branch Analytical Procedures
Manual.
Investigates the application of automated
analysis and information handling techniques and the
applicability of new scientific processes, techniques and
approaches for assessing consumer food poisoning complaints, heat
penetration process evaluations and container integrity
evaluations. Devises modifications to equipment for the
evaluation of cans and other hermetically sealed containers and
develops screening and automated handling procedures to
accommodate large numbers of samples during the course of a
health hazard investigation.
Provides specialized knowledge and advice as a
member of the Directorate National Science Committee, in the
development of options for the National Compliance Program in
the-Food Microbiology Project area. Identifies new areas of
concern based on a specialist knowledge of field conditions,
current science and technology and practices in the food
industry. Evaluates and recommends whether existing projects
should be cancelled or revised or new projects developed to
resolve newly identified problems. Defines objectives of new or
revised projects and recommends ways to achieve them.
Provides authoritative advice to officials of the department
and industry in the area of food microbiology and in particular
the analysis and evaluation of low acid foods in hermetically
sealed containers for the presence of pathogenic micro-organisms
and their toxins.
Acts as a member of joint inspection teams to
investigate food industry problems. Trains departmental and
industry scientists in the application of methods. Provides
expert testimony in court concerning the reliability and
significance of analytical methods and provides advice to crown
attorneys on the interpretation of analytical data. Develops and
implements procedures and schedules for method and instrument
quality assurance for microbiological analysis and develops and
recommends safety guidelines and procedures for microbiology
laboratory operations. Evaluates analytical equipment, makes
recommendations for purchase and prepares detailed specifications
and evaluation criteria.
Analyses unusual or difficult samples as an Official Analyst
for the purpose of the enforcement of the regulations and
provisions of the Food and Drugs Act and conducts, and leads
project teams in, special investigations to resolve problems
associated with the microbiological contamination of foods.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the Unit Head in
terms of method development
project goals and National Science Committee assignments.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 3 - The work involves comprehensive studies and
investigations into the
microbiological analysis of foods with emphasis on low acid
foods in hermetically
sealed containers for the purpose of method development and
national project
planning.
C. Degree 3 - - The work involves the development and
validation of analytical methods
for the microbiological analysis of foods, participation in
national program
planning, the provision of expert advice, and the conduct of
analysis.
D. Degree 3 - Plans and conducts a broad diversity of
analytical, method development,
investigational and problem solving work in the area of food
microbiology.
|
|
Complexity of work
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Information in terms of new methods is
developed and information for use
in program planning is obtained through investigation,
selection and interpretation.
B. Degree 3 - Information, data and new methods can be
validated by repeating
experiments, using alternative procedures or through
literature referencing.
C. Degree 3 - Information on food industry practices and
potential microbiological
hazards in food products, and analytical data on actual levels
of micro-organisms
and container integrity evaluations contain several variables
requiring
interpretation and are sometimes ambiguous.
D. Degree 3 - The relationships among variables such as
container integrity, levels of
pathogenic and non-pathogenic contamination and human health
hazard are sometimes
conflicting and require investigation and interpretation to
ensure valid results.
Relationships between industry practices and level of
microbiological contaminants
in foods require analysis and interpretation for project
planning.
E. Degree 3 - The activities of inspection staff and
compliance officers affect the
direction of method development and priority of
investigational work.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists and officials to
participate in cooperative
method development and project planning activities, with
industry to resolve
problems and provide advice and training, and with Crown
attorneys to provide advice
on the interpretation of analytical findings.
G. Degree 3 - The work requires developing new methods and
procedures for the
microbiological analysis of foods.
H. Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the
principles and theories of food microbiology and of the
procedures and techniques
used for the isolation, identification, enumeration and
confirmation of
micro-organisms and for the evaluation of food container
integrity, as well as a
good knowledge of the technologies and practices used in the
food manufacturing
industry.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Approaches to conducting method development
studies and recommendations
concerning National Science Committee project planning are
reviewed by the Unit Head
for soundness of judgment in terms of meeting objectives.
B. Degree 3 - Professional guidance is received from the
Unit Head on the resolution of
difficult analytical or method development problems.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires identifying analytical
problems and new areas of
concern, defining project objectives and determining
approaches for the resolution
of difficult problems, identifying compliance problems and
recommending options for
their resolution in the Food Microbiology Project area.
|
|
|
Degree
|
D. Degree 3 - The work of project team members involved in
method development studies
or special investigations is reviewed for completeness and
compliance with project
guidelines and quality assurance objectives.
E. Degree 3 - Work on the National Science Committee
requires the interpretation and
evaluation of scientific data on the levels of microbiological
contaminants in foods
as well as methods of analysis and food industry
practices.
F. Degree 4 - Provides advice to departmental officials and
food industry
representatives based on a recognized expertise in food
microbiology and in
particular, in the analysis and evaluation of low acid food in
hermetically sealed
containers, and related food industry practices.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 1 - As applicable, assigns work to project
staff.
B. Degree 2 - Ensures proper use of instruments, supplies
and facilities for the
microbiological analysis of foods.
C. Degree 3 - Evaluates requirements, prepares detailed
specifications and evaluation
criteria for, and recommends acquisition of laboratory
equipment.
D. Degree 1 - Outside assistance when required is requested
from the Unit Head.
E. Degree 3 - Implements quality assurance procedures for
the microbiological analysis
of foods.
F. Degree 3 - Coordinates work with National Science
Committee members and regional
inspection and laboratory staff.
G. Degree 2 - Develops and recommends safety guidelines and
procedures for
microbiological work in the laboratory.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Recommendations and advice contribute to the
development of national
compliance projects, and results of the work contribute to the
availability of
reliable methods for use in on-going laboratory
operations.
B. Degree 3 -
(i) Degree 3 - The identification of violations of the Food
and Drugs Act and
Regulations may result in the regulatory control of commercial
food products.
Recommendations and advice on the design and implementation of
national
compliance projects may lead to economic or technological
effects on the food
industry.
(ii) No significant impact.
(iii) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the
work affect the
regulatory control of foods containing volatile levels of
microbiological
contaminants.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - The evaluation of information and results of
the work provide information
on, and contribute to greater knowledge of the levels of
microbiological
contaminants in the food supply. New methods and procedures
for the microbiological
analysis of foods are developed.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Chief, Food Laboratory
- Head - Food Chemistry Unit
- Head - Food Chemistry Unit
- Head - Mycotoxins and Food Additives
Unit
- Head - Drug Microbiology Unit
- Head - Food Microbiology Unit
* - Specialist, Food Microbiology BI-3
- Microbiologists (2)
- Technicians (4)
- Lab. Support (2)
* Bench-mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 14
|
Level: 3
|
Descriptive Title: Specialist, Drug Microbiology
|
|
Reporting to the Head, Drug Microbiology
Unit:
Conducts studies and leads project teams to
develop, validate and apply new or improved methods to assess the
potency of antibiotics and vitamins or for the isolation,
identification, enumeration and confirmation of microbial
organisms and their toxins of sanitary and health hazard
significance in a wide range of domestic and imported drugs and
medical devices, to ensure the availability of reliable methods
for laboratory operations and for inclusion in the Branch
analytical Procedures Manual. Investigates the application of
automated analysis and information handling techniques and the
applicability of new scientific processes and techniques.
Provides specialized knowledge and advice as a
member of the Directorate National Science Committee, in the
development of options for the National Compliance Program in the
Drug Microbiology Project area. Identifies new areas of concern
based on a specialist knowledge of field conditions, current
science and technology and practices in the drug industry.
Evaluates and recommends whether existing projects should be
cancelled or revised or new projects developed to resolve newly
identified problems. Defines objectives of new or revised
projects and recommends ways to achieve them.
Provides authoritative advice to officials of
the department and industry in the area of Drug Microbiology.
Acts as a member of joint inspection teams to investigate drug
industry problems. Trains departmental and industry scientists in
the application of methods. Provides expert testimony in court
concerning the reliability and significance of analytical methods
and provides advice to crown attorneys on the interpretation of
analytical data. Develops and implements procedures and schedules
for method and instrument quality assurance for drug microbiology
analysis and develops and recommends safety guidelines and
procedures for microbiology laboratory operations. Evaluates
analytical equipment, makes recommendations for purchase and
prepares detailed specifications and evaluation criteria.
Analyses unusual or difficult samples as an
Official Analyst for the purpose of the enforcement of the
regulations and provisions of the Food and Drugs Act and
conducts, and leads project teams in, special investigations to
resolve problems associated with vitamin and antibiotic potency
and the microbiological contamination of drugs.
Specifications
|
Degree
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the Unit Head in
terms of method development
project goals and National Science Committee assignments.
B. Degree 3 - The work involves comprehensive studies and
investigations into the
microbiological analysis of drugs, and the assessment of
antibiotic and vitamin
potency for the purpose of method development and national
project planning.
C. Degree 3 - The work involves the development and
validation of analytical methods
for the microbiological analysis of drugs, and the assessment
of antibiotic and
vitamin potency for the purpose of method development and
national project planning.
D. Degree 3 - Plans and conducts a broad diversity of
analytical, method development,
investigational, and problem solving work in the area of drug
microbiology.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Complexity of Work
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Information in terms of new methods is
developed and information for use
in program planning is obtained through investigation,
selection and interpretation.
B. Degree 3 - Information, data and new methods can be
validated by repeating
experiments, using alternative procedures or through
literature referencing.
C. Degree 3 - Information on drug industry practices and
potential microbiological
hazards in drug products, and analytical data on antibiotic
and vitamin potency and
actual levels of micro-organisms contain several variables
requiring interpretation
and are sometimes ambiguous.
D. Degree 3 - The relationships among levels of pathogenic
and non-pathogenic
contamination and human health hazard are sometimes
conflicting and require
investigation and interpretation to ensure valid results.
Relationships between
industry practices and level of microbiological contamination
in drugs and
antibiotic and vitamin potency require analysis and
interpretation for project
planning.
E. Degree 3 - The activities of inspection staff and
compliance officers affect the
direction of method development and priority of
investigational work.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists and officials to
participate in cooperative
method development and project planning activities, with
industry to resolve
problems and provide advice and training and with crown
attorneys to provide advice
on the interpretation of analytical findings.
G. Degree 3 - The work requires developing new methods and
procedures for the
microbiological analysis of drug and the assessment of
antibiotic and vitamin
potency.
H. Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the
principles and theories of drug microbiology and of the
procedures and techniques
used for the isolation, identification, enumeration and
confirmation of
micro-organisms and for the assessment of antibiotic and
vitamin potency, as well as
a good knowledge of the technologies and practices used in the
drug manufacturing
industry.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Approaches to conducting method development
studies and recommendations
concerning National Science Committee project planning are
reviewed by the Unit Head
for soundness of judgment in terms of meeting objectives.
B. Degree 3 - Professional guidance is received from the
Unit Head on the resolution of
difficult analytical or method development problems.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires identifying analytical
problems and new areas of
concern, defining project objectives and determining
approaches for the resolution
of difficult problems, identifying compliance problems and
recommending options for
their resolution in the drug Microbiology Project area.
D. Degree 3 - The work of project team members involved in
method development studies
or special investigations is reviewed for completeness and
compliance with project
guidelines and quality assurance objectives.
E. Degree 3 - Work on the National Science Committee
requires the interpretation and
evaluation of scientific data on the levels of microbiological
contaminants in drugs
as well as methods of analysis and drug industry
practices.
F. Degree 4 - Provides to departmental officials and drug
industry representatives,
advice based on a recognized expertise in drug microbiology
and the assessment of
antibiotic and vitamin potency and related drug industry
practices.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Management Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 1 - As applicable, assigns work to project
staff.
B. Degree 2 - Ensures proper use of instruments, supplies
and facilities for the
microbiological analysis of drugs.
C. Degree 3 - Evaluates requirements, prepares detailed
specifications and evaluation
criteria for and recommends the acquisition of laboratory
equipment.
D. Degree 1 - Outside assistance when required is requested
from the Unit Head.
E. Degree 3 - Implements quality assurance procedures for
the microbiological analysis
of drugs.
F. Degree 3 - - Coordinates work with National Science
Committee members and regional
inspection and laboratory staff.
G. Degree 2 - Develops and recommends safety guidelines and
procedures for
microbiological work in the laboratory.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Recommendations and advice contribute to the
development of national
compliance projects, and results of the work contribute to the
availability of
reliable methods for use in ongoing laboratory operations.
B. Degree 3 -
(i) Degree 3 - The identification of violations of the Food
and Drugs Act and
Regulations may result in the regulatory control of commercial
drug products.
Recommendations and advice on the design and implementation of
national
compliance projects may lead to economic or technological
effects on the
pharmaceutical industry.
(ii) No significant impact.
(iii) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the
work affect the
regulatory control of drugs containing volatile levels of
microbiological
contaminants or non-compliant antibiotic or vitamin
potency.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - The evaluation of information and results of
the work provide information
on the levels of microbiological contaminants in the drug
supply. New methods and
procedures for the microbiological analysis of drugs and the
assessment of
antibiotic and vitamin potency are developed.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Chief, Food Laboratory
- Head - Food Chemistry Unit A
- Head - Food Chemistry Unit B
- Head - Food Chemistry Unit C
- Head - Drug Microbiology Unit
* - Specialist, Drug Microbiology BI-3
- Microbiologist
- Microbiologist - Development Grade
- Technicians (7)
- Lab. Support (2)
* Bench-mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 15
|
Level: 3
|
Descriptive Title: Head, Marine Microbiology Laboratory
|
|
Reporting to the Manager, Marine Programs,
Environmental Protection Branch:
Plans, organizes and directs the
microbiological sampling investigations and analytical studies of
a mobile laboratory unit to determine the bacteriological levels
of contamination in water, sediment and shell fish samples taken
in the shell fish growing areas found in the vicinity of
industrial or municipal sewage treatment plants, on the coast of
British Columbia. Interprets results with respect to established
health standards and the Fisheries Act and recommends appropriate
actions such as: closure or reopening of designated shell fish
growing areas; changes to regulations or guidelines; corrective
or clean-up activities; prosecution of offenders.
Plans, organizes and directs the microbiological analytical
services of the regional laboratory which conducts
microbiological analyses of marine samples taken in support of
the pollution abatement and control activities of other units of
the department and other federal and provincial agencies.
Conducts microbiological methodology development studies
related to all aspects of marine environmental microbiology;
collaborates with other laboratories in the evaluation of new
microbiological methods and participates in collaborative studies
of marine environmental assessment with other agencies.
Prepares reports, departmental briefs and
publishes scientific papers on new aspects of the work and new
methodology.
Supervise two full-time support staff including a professional
and up to five casual summer assistants.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kind of Assignments
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Objectives of assignments are defined in terms
of monitoring the bacterial
levels associated with shell fish growing areas of British
Columbia, to determine the
safety of the area to the public harvesting shell fish for
consumption.
B. Degree 3 - The work involves comprehensive investigations
in selected geographic
areas to determine if any bacterial problem exist as well as
provide microbiological
support services to other units involved in pollution
abatement.
C. Degree 3 - The work includes supervising the work of
staff engaged in the conduct of
sampling, analyzing and investigating problem areas of
bacterial pollution, and
providing advice.
D. Degree 3 - The work consists in planning and assigning
tasks for the ongoing work of
the microbiology laboratory, to ensure that monitoring
objectives are met within
established resource guidelines.
|
|
Complexity of the Work
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Information and representative data are often
difficult to obtain,
interpret and select because of changes in currents, tides and
inclement weather
conditions affecting sampling. Samples are easily contaminated
and techniques are
selected to suit varying field conditions.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 2 - Information and data on bacterial
identification and quantitation can
normally be validated by known procedures, resampling and
literature references.
C. Degree 3 - The microbiological analysis of marine
samples for a full range of
micro-organisms is characterized by several variables
requiring interpretation,
poorly defined variability and some ambiguity due to the
presence of non-pathogenic
and naturally occurring organisms.
D. Degree 3 - Relationships among variables are sometime
conflicting between different
sites and may require further investigations and particular
interpretation.
E. Degree 3 - Work plan and scheduling are frequently
affected by the pollution
abatement activities of scientists and officials outside the
organizational unit,
requesting priority or urgent service.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists and officials
outside the unit to exchange
information, collaborate on projects and provide advice.
G. Degree 3 - The work requires developing new
microbiological techniques and
procedures to expand the scope of analytical services.
H. Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the
principles, theories and practice of microbiology and
familiarity with marine biology
with emphasis on shell fish and some familiarity with
hydrology, oceanography and
limnology and familiarity with supervisory practices.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Approaches, recommendations and conclusions
are reviewed periodically for
soundness of judgment and in terms of attainment of work and
service objectives.
B. Degree 3 - Professional guidance is received from other
scientists working in
microbiology. Guidance is received from the supervisor for the
resolution of
difficult problems.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires defining specific
objectives for each study site,
identifying problems and determining the appropriate approach
in each case.
D. Degree 3 - The work of subordinate staff is reviewed for
completeness and compliance
to work standards and safety guidelines. The results of the
work of other scientists
on pollution abatement is reviewed for applicability to own
subject area.
E. Degree 3 - The results, conclusions and recommendations
of subordinate staff are
interpreted to determine their meaning and implications on the
safety of shell fish
growing areas of the region.
F. Degree 3 - Advice is provided to colleagues and to the
superior on the implications
of findings in various sites. Guidance on microbiological
sampling and analytical
matters is provided to subordinate staff or to other
scientists working on pollution
abatement.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - The work requires the supervision of a
laboratory staff including a
professional, a technician and a seasonal staff.
B. Degree 3 - The work requires controlling the use and
maintenance of allocated
laboratory equipment, supplies and facilities.
C. Degree 3 - Prepare specifications and recommends the
acquisition of specific
laboratory equipment, materials and services to satisfy
requirements and to provide
effective microbiological analytical services.
D. Degree 3 - Identifies and substantiates the need for
outside assistance, recommends
suitable sources of assistance and arrange for usual
assistance.
|
|
|
Degree
|
E. Degree 3 - Implements quality assurance, performance and
safety standards and
procedures to meet unit's services objectives.
F. Degree 3 - Usually required to coordinate related
activities with those of other
scientists involved in pollution abatement.
G. Degree 3 - Interprets and implements guidelines,
directives and procedures
applicable to the work, the laboratory and the field
activities.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and
Activities
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the work
affect the direction and
intensity of pollution abatement activities of the department,
and contributes to
the formulation of guidelines, regulations and standards
regarding the safety of
shell fish harvesting.
B. Degree 3 -
(i) Degree 2 - Results of the work can have some economic
effects on regulated
industries located on the coastal regions of B.C.
(ii) Degree 3 - Results of the work are aimed at the
protection of the environment
and shell fish as a natural resource.
(iii) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the
work are aimed at
protecting the public harvesting shell fish on the coast of
B.C.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - Development of new microbiological methods of
analysis and the
investigation of bacterial pollution on the marine coast of
B.C. provides knowledge
and understanding of microbiological phenomena in
environmental pollution control.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Manager, Marine Programs
- Senior Marine Biologist - Surveillance - Biologist
- Technician
- Senior Marine Biologist - Aquatic programs
- Marine Biologist (See BM#6)
- Technician - Field activities
* - Head, Marine Microbiology Laboratory BI-3
- Microbiologist (1) BI-2
- Technician (1) EG-ESS-07
- Seasonal (5)
* Bench-mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 16
|
Level: 4
|
Descriptive Title: Water Development Impacts Ecologist
|
|
Reporting to the Chief, Engineering and
Development Division:
Elaborates and discusses with Division Chief proposals
concerning programs and objectives, required studies, priorities,
resources requirements and required participation.
Participates in the development and conduct of
multidisciplinary national and international programs
under the Canada Waters Act and the Boundary
Waters Treaty, to evaluate and mitigate against any possible
damage to the environment from proposed major water or hydro
development programs or projects. Initiates, coordinates and
supervises cooperative studies within a broad spectrum of
specialization to resolve or mitigate anticipated ecological
problems and fill knowledge gaps or deficiencies. Reviews
progress reports and provides guidance to participants of
simultaneous water-related studies of varied disciplines,
analyzing and interpreting results in terms of ecological
significance; provides conclusions and recommendations,
synthesizing findings into a comprehensive program report; and,
develops and makes recommendations concerning water management
plans.
Provides specialist advice to senior officers
of the organization and other federal-provincial and
interdisciplinary boards, committees and task forces on a wide
range of ecological matters relating to water resource
development and comprehensive river basin planning and water use
licensing. Participates on Boards, Committees and Task Forces on
interjurisdictional environmental matters.
Provides liaison between Inland Waters
Directorate and other Directorates, departmental services and
outside agencies responsible for studies of the effects of water
resource development projects on the environment. Chairs task
forces or committees, developing guidelines or codes of practices
relating to water use and environmental evaluations. Prepares
recommendations on fisheries and wildlife management requirements
in relation to water levels, flows and quality. Monitors projects
and programs for conformity with commitments or agreements and
interests of the organization and with projected estimates and
expenditures.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Objectives of the work are stated in terms of
broad operational goals
based on long-term work planning, and pertains to required
multi-disciplinary assessment of ecological implications of
water use or water development projects or
programs.
B. Degree 4 - Work is performed within a specialized subject
area of environmental
assessment involving the application of a number of scientific
disciplines within the
disciplines of biology, chemistry and engineering. Work
requires providing inter
disciplinary link between water resource engineering and
ecological resource management, through the comprehensive
assessment of the implications of water development
projects on ecological systems and resources and the
assessment practices and
institutional processes.
|
|
|
Degree
|
C. Degree 4 - Activities differ from one another in many
aspects and include the
assessment of the implications of water development programs
and projects on the
surrounding environment; planning and coordinating projects
and studies of an
ecological nature within an interdisciplinary,
interjurisdictional framework;
developing terms of reference for, and organizing and
monitoring the work of consultants or other agencies
conducting environmental assessments or related studies;
providing specialist advice or information on problems and
ecosystems and functional direction to regional contacts on
environmental assessment problems.
D. Degree 4 - The work requires planning and coordination
of multi-disciplinary studies
and teams conducting the assessment of water development
impacts and ecosystem
dynamics to ensure that Directorate's interests are addressed
and environmental
commitments are achieved as part of the departmental
objectives. A high degree of
freedom and latitude exists in the planning, organizing and
coordinating of such
studies.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - The work requires setting study priorities in
cooperation with
participating agencies and in collaboration with specialists
from a wide range of
disciplines and obtaining by intensive investigations,
multi-disciplinary information
and data which are often difficult to obtain or predict,
interpret and select. For
example assessing the ecological effects of flooding and
reservoir inundation.
B. Degree 4 - The information is often conflicting and
difficult to interpret or
validate because of the types of information received and the
conflicting nature of
the information sources outside the department. Complex
investigations are required
to validate new information and validating is frequently
impeded by gaps in
knowledge.
C. Degree 4 - Information and data pertaining to the wide
spectrum of ecological
concerns involve many variables which are difficult to
interpret. Sound judgment
is required to use the data.
D. Degree 4 - Relationships between aquatic communities and
factors affecting these, are
complicated and require in-depth investigations to identify
and resolve conflicts
and interpretation problems.
E. Degree 4 - The work is normally affected by the
activities of engineers and
consultants outside the organization and requires
consideration of the implication
of their activities on the project or study. The work also
requires consideration
of the activities of other services within the department and
other agencies
conducting related studies.
F. Degree 4 - Contacts are with scientists and officials
outside the organization to
arrange cooperative projects, negotiate terms of contract
work, obtain required collaboration on matters affecting studies
and for providing advice based on a recognized expertise in the
field of aquatic ecology.
G. Degree 4 - New concepts and approaches are developed
to establish criteria for the
evaluation of the environmental implications of water
development projects. Each
situation presents mostly unique and different factors and
problems.
H. Degree 4 - The work requires a thorough knowledge of
basic ecological principles and
processes and of resource management complemented by a
knowledge and understanding
of the engineering, physical and chemical factors that affect
ecosystems.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Professional Responsibility
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Results of conclusions and recommendations of
the ecological studies are
periodically reviewed for effectiveness and interpreted to
determine their
departmental, national or international implications.
B. Degree 4 - Professional guidance is not available
within the organization. Guidance
to resolve unusual and complex problems may be obtained from
scientific agencies and
institutions.
C. Degree 4 - The work requires dealing with difficult
situations and problems arising
out of the direction and coordination of multi-disciplinary
national and inter
national projects and studies. The work has scope for defining
terms of reference
and establishing program objectives. Authoritative advice is
provided and approaches
recommended for the resolution of complex impact assessment
issues involving numerous
disciplines, some in inter-related fields of specialization
including plant and
animal biology, water chemistry, engineering and
economics.
D. Degree 4 - As senior ecologist in the Branch, reviews,
evaluates and assesses the
related work of regional personnel assigned to committees and
task forces for the
implementation of policies and programs. Reviews water related
proposals for
scientific merit and for recommending actions. Reviews and
evaluates study reports
for deficiencies and scientific feasibility and practicality.
Reviews program and
project proposals submitted by study coordinators or
contractors for
comprehensiveness, clarity and adherence to terms of
reference.
E. Degree 4 - Interprets results of multi-disciplinary
studies to determine
applicability and implications on problem solutions or to
recommend mitigative
measures for water use or development projects.
F. Degree 4 - Authoritative advice on the resolution of the
various aspects of
water-oriented ecological problems associated with water
development or the gathering
of baseline ecological information, is provided to senior
management in the department, federal and provincial
agencies and boards, and to joint national or international
committees. Advice is based on environmental assessment problems,
methods and policy, alternative multiple water uses, the biotic
community and ecological relationships and problems affecting the
Directorate programs.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 1 - The work occasionally requires assigning work
to non-subordinate staff.
B. Degree 2 - The work requires ensuring proper use of
equipment and supplies allocated
for conducting field studies.
C. Degree 3 - Assesses requirements for department resources
to be committed for
multi-disciplinary studies; identifies the requirements and
recommends the
acquisition or use and payment of specific services needed for
conducting the
studies.
D. Degree 4 - Determines the need and negotiates for outside
assistance, prescribes
terms of reference, selects consultants or other sources of
assistance, relating
probable cost and benefits to budgetary limitations.
E. Degree 3 - Sets terms of reference of studies; monitors
and reviews study progress
and work by consultants for conformance to requirements and
projected estimates,
control of expenditures and fulfillment of objectives.
F. Degree 4 - Coordinates a wide range of related component
studies involving a broad
spectrum of disciplines conducted simultaneously with others
in federal, provincial
and State agencies and in the private sector.
G. Degree 2 - Implements established administrative
procedures for the cost, control of
fund expenditures, the recommendation of payments and
reporting.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Impact of Recommendations and
Activities
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Recommendations and advice or consultations
concerning ecological inputs
and impact assessments contribute to the development of more
comprehensive Directorate policies and affect the
orientation, priorities and implementation of
projects, studies, guidelines and directives.
B. Degree 4 -
(i) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and input assessments
often result in changes
in the operational and development engineering of water
development projects
with corresponding economic and technological effects.
(ii) Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice and results of the
work contribute to the
conservation, rehabilitation and enhancement of aquatic
ecological resources
or mitigation of potential damages to the environment from
water use or
development programs or projects.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 4 - Development of new concepts or approaches,
criteria and techniques to
assess environmental impacts contributes to a more
comprehensive knowledge and an
improved understanding of ecosystems, damages and effective
remedial actions.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
- Director, Water Planning and Management Branch
- Chief, Water Management Systems Division
- Chief, Engineering and Development Division
* - Water Development Impacts Ecologist (BI-4)
- Water Management Projects Evaluation Engineer
- Sr. Hydrologic Engineer
- Hydrologic Technologist
- Head, Engineering Section
- Sr. Design Engineers
- Design Engineers
* Bench-mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 17
|
Level: 4
|
Descriptive Title: Chief, Migratory Birds Conservation
|
|
Reporting to the Regional Director, Canadian
Wildlife Service:
Plans, develops, directs and controls the research and
wildlife management projects relating to departmental program
goals on migratory bird population and habitats within the
Pacific and Yukon region. Recommends regional goals, objectives
and policies of the migratory bird conservation plan. Controls
and monitors projects from their inception through to delivery of
the final reports, participating in the preparation of main
estimates, allocation of resources and monitoring progress
against performance indicators.
Coordinates the regional waterfowl and other
migratory bird surveys with other agencies, provinces and other
departments in Canada and the U.S. Participates in national and
international committees and task forces for the review of joint
programs and the negotiation of international, federal/provincial
or territorial agreements to meet objectives of the North
American Waterfowl Management Plan.
Directs the development, implementation and
coordination of regional population monitoring program.
Directs and manages the activities of a staff
of professionals, enforcement officers and technicians and a
seasonal support staff. Prepares budgets, allocates resources,
controls operational costs, selects staff, allocates work and
implements performance and safety standards to meet priorities
and objectives.
Provides advice to senior officials on the protection and
management of migratory birds population and contributes to
decisions on legislation, regulations, policies and programs of
the Canadian Wildlife Service. Serves as scientific authority on
contracts and co-authors scientific papers in recognized
journals.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Objectives are broadly stated in terms of
support to programs on the
conservation of migratory birds and the North American
Waterfowl Management Plan.
B. Degree 4 - The work involves application of a number of
scientific principles and
theories for directing studies and research, developing
guidelines and action plans,
monitoring and conserving migratory birds and their
habitats.
C. Degree 4 - The work involves organizing and directing
wildlife management and
research projects, coordinating survey work with other
organizations, participating
in the review of joint programs and in the negotiations of
agreements, monitoring
projects, supervising the work of staff engaged in studies and
investigations,
providing advice and controlling the use of resources.
D. Degree 4 - The work involves planning, organizing and
implementing migratory bird
management projects negotiated under agreement with
Territorial, Provincial and
other government organizations, and private sector
organizations such as Ducks
Unlimited. Considerable scope is permitted in planning the
direction of
inter-jurisdiction programs within the objectives of the
Wildlife Conservation
Program, and in ensuring that operational goals are achieved
within the limitations
of available resources, policy, directives and guidelines.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Complexity of Work
|
4
|
A. Degree 3 - Information and data on the population status
and changes in the
distribution and concentration of the various species, on the
rates of mortality and
harvesting, on feeding, nesting, habitats, productivity and
other aspects of
population dynamics, as well as information and data on the
effect of changes in
climatic and environmental conditions, are often difficult to
obtain, select and
interpret but sources usually can be identified from past
practices and experiences.
B. Degree 3 - Information and data can be validated by a
combination of experimentation
and comparison with similar conditions in literature
references or other flyways and
related monitoring surveys.
C. Degree 4 - Information and data on the populations of
various species of migratory
birds of the region, on population dynamics phenomena,
habitats, feeding, nesting,
on climatic and environmental conditions and mortality,
harvest and productivity,
are characterized by variability and comprises many variables.
Difficult
interpretations are required and judgment must be exercised in
the use of the data
to provide reliable basis for action plans and effective
resource and habitat
management.
D. Degree 3 - Relationships between the variables affecting
migratory bird population,
concentration, productivity, feeding and mortality can be
conflicting and require
investigation, comparison and interpretation.
E. Degree 4 - Work is normally affected by the activities of
research scientists,
officials, private agencies and interest groups outside the
organizational unit,
such as Ducks Unlimited, Habitat 2000, sportsmen and
subsistance hunters,
naturalists and land owners.
F. Degree 4 - Contacts are with scientists and officials on
cooperative projects, with
committees to negotiate agreements, establish standards,
regulations and guidelines
and studies negotiated through agreements, and to provide
advice based on a recognized expertise to public and private
sector agencies such as B.C. Ministry of Environment and B.C.
Nature Trust.
G. Degree 3 - The work requires developing new migratory
bird management techniques and
procedures using known approaches and precedents.
H. Degree 4 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the
principles, theories and practices of ornithology and a
knowledge of ecology,
botany, biometrics and of wildlife management strategies. In
addition, the work
requires knowledge in managing staff and other resources
allocated.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Utilization of resources, report conclusions
and key recommendations are
reviewed for effectiveness. Work results are reviewed annually
in terms of
attainment of the Canadian Wildlife Service objectives
pertaining to migratory birds
conservation.
B. Degree 4 - Guidance is received from superior mostly in
areas of international
concerns and agreements where unusual or complex problems can
occur.
C. Degree 4 - The work requires establishing resource
limitations and objectives for
projects or studies and providing approaches for the
resolution of difficult
problems by own staff.
D. Degree 4 - The work and conclusions of subordinate staff
is reviewed for soundness
of judgment. The work of other scientists involved in same
subject areas or under
contract is reviewed for acceptability.
|
|
|
Degree
|
E. Degree 4 - Results of studies or projects are interpreted
to determine the
implications on migratory birds conservation and on those
regional aspects affecting
the North American Waterfowl Management Plan.
F. Degree 4 - Advice based on recognized expertise is
provided to other scientists and
officials on the protection and management of the migratory
birds population in the
Pacific and Yukon region, contributing to decisions, policies
and programs of the
Canadian Wildlife Service.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - The work requires the operational management
of six professionals
(Biologists and research scientists); technicians, regulation
and enforcement
officers; and seasonal/casual support staff.
B. Degree 4 - Allocates the use of equipment, such as
boats, motors, vehicles and field
supplies according to work priorities and project
requirements.
C. Degree 5 - The work requires exercising delegated
authority for the acquisition of
resources and expenditure of funds to meet work priorities and
objectives.
D. Degree 4 - The work requires choosing and negotiating
for appropriate outside
assistance, such as consultants, university specialists and
students.
E. Degree 4 - Controls and coordinates long term
operational planning, work plans,
projects schedules and performance within the departmental
planning processes, to
meet priorities and established objectives.
F. Degree 4 - The work requires coordinating differing
activities such as enforcement,
population studies, development of resources management
studies, with those of
provincial, territorial, international wildlife agencies and
private organizations.
G. Degree 4 - Recommends and develops internal
administrative, safety and management
directives and guidelines.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice or consultations
contribute to the development of
policies of the Migratory Bird Conservation Program and affect
the implementation of
projects or studies guidelines and directives.
B. Degree 4 -
(i) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the work
have economic
effects on the commercial operations associated with the
exploitation of the
migratory birds resource as a tourist attraction or game
sport.
(ii) Degree 4 - The main thrust of the work is to contribute
to the development of
policies, decisions and recommendations to preserve wildlife
for sustainable
use as a natural resource.
(iii) Degree 2 - Recommendations based on study
and survey findings such as
indication of an outbreak of botulism in waterfowl or
ingestion of lead and
other contaminant such as pesticides by migratory birds and
referral to the
Department of Health and Welfare, can have implications on
human health and
contribute to change to harvesting regulations.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
Degree 4 - Decisions and recommendations contribute to the
development of knowledge
and improved understanding of issues and concerns of wildlife
management and more
particularly, those concerning migratory bird population
dynamics and status of
flyways and habitats in the Pacific and Yukon region.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Regional Director General, Conservation and Protection
Regional Director, Canadian Wildlife Service
- Chief, Admin. Services
- Chief Wildlife Conservation
* - Chief, Migratory Birds Conservation BI-4
- Research Biometrician
- Research Technician
- Research Scientist
- Migratory Bird Biologist BI-3
- Seabird Technician (EG-ESS-6)
- Survey Biologists (3) BI-2
- Head Regulation and Enforcement (PM-4)
- Enforcement Coordinator (PM-3)
- Seasonal Support Staff
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 18
|
Level: 4
|
Descriptive Title: Head, Food Microbiology Laboratory Unit
|
|
Reporting to the Chief, Food Laboratory
Division:
Plans the activities of the Food Microbiology
Laboratory Unit, specializing in the analysis, assessment and
evaluation of a wide range of domestic and imported food
products, including low acid foods in hermetically sealed
containers, for microbial organisms and their toxins of sanitary
and health hazard significance to ensure the achievement of
program commitments and objectives. Coordinates the
implementation of a number of analytical projects including
continuing projects to monitor product quality and safety and to
provide analytical data on which to base standards and
regulations; investigational projects to provide data and
scientific evaluations which form the basis for regulatory
action; and development projects to provide new and improved
methods and procedures. Negotiates analytical commitments with
national project officers and with regional inspection staff.
Assesses resource and equipment requirements and develops and
recommends to the Chief, a detailed operational plan for the
laboratory unit.
Manages, directs, controls and evaluates the
work of the laboratory unit to ensure effective use of resources,
achievement of the operational plan, the development and
maintenance of quality assurance standards, and the rapid
response to health hazard crisis situations. Defines objectives
for the laboratory unit and allocates work, equipment and
facilities. Monitors and evaluates program achievement in
relation to time commitments and quality and quantity standards
and makes required adjustments to the operational plan or
resource allocations. Directs the development and implementation
of a laboratory equipment maintenance plan. Assesses analytical
data, reconciles discrepancies and resolves abnormal difficulties
by proposing alternative approaches to resolve problems
encountered by the staff.
Manages and directs method development projects
in the food microbiology project areas to ensure the availability
of reliable methods for laboratory operations and for inclusion
in the Branch analytical Procedures Manual for use by all Branch
Laboratories, the regulated industry in their quality control and
product monitoring programs, and as international reference
documents. Develops proposals for complete investigations,
detailing the purpose, approach and required resources, and
participates in National Science Committee meetings to review and
prioritize project proposals. Assigns method development
projects to the Food Microbiology Specialist or other staff,
defines objectives of the study and provides guidance on
experimental design and the resolution of unusual or difficult
problems.
Provides advice on analytical methods, sampling
plans and the provisions and regulations of the Food and Drugs
Act to departmental and provincial officials, food manufacturers
and importers, private laboratories and to the Department of
Justice representing the Branch in court prosecutions under the
Food and Drugs Act. Participates in joint inspections and
investigations of food manufacturing plants and acts as a
technical advisor to the Food Inspection Division in formal
hearings with industry representatives and their legal
counsel.
Provides recommendations and advice on the
development of new compliance or data gathering projects.
Identifies deficiencies in operational and administrative
procedures, recommends changes and ensures their implementation.
Directs the preparation of detailed specifications, the
evaluation of equipment and suppliers' proposals and makes
recommendations on the purchase of major equipment.
Develops and implements an Occupational Health
and Safety program for the laboratory unit.
Specifications
|
Degree
|
Kind of Assignments
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Objectives of the work are stated by the
Division Chief in terms of
developing and implementing an operational plan for the
provision of analytical
services, professional advice and method development in the
area of Food
Microbiology.
B. Degree 4 - The work involves the planning and direction
of an operational unit
involved in the analysis, assessment and evaluation of food
products for a wide
range of microbial organisms and their toxins of sanitary and
health hazard
significance, method development and national project
planning.
C. Degree 4 - Activities include planning, organizing,
controlling and supervising the
work of staff engaged in food microbiology analyses,
investigations and method
development; planning and controlling the use of facilities,
equipment and
resources; providing advice; and coordinating the work with
inspection staff in own
and other regions.
D. Degree 4 - The work requires planning, organizing and
assigning work for analyses,
investigations and studies to ensure that operational goals
are achieved within
resource limitations.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - The work requires obtaining information on
the identity and levels of a
wide variety of micro-organisms and toxins of sanitary and
health hazard
significance in a broad range of domestic and imported foods
prepared from both old
and new technologies and involving exotic or mutated pathogens
requiring careful
selection and interpretation of the data.
B. Degree 4 - Information and data required for compliance,
particularly relating to new
or unusual microbiological entities or illness with uncertain
epidemiological
evidence can normally be validated only by difficult or
complex investigation.
C. Degree 4 - The wide variety of foods and possible
micro-organisms including food
pathogens, micro-organisms indicative of unsanitary
manufacturing conditions and
micro-organisms associated with non-sterility of retorted
foods, results in many
variables with high variability, are difficult to interpret
and require judgment to
use.
Degree 4 - The relationships among the many micro-organisms,
toxins, food industry
practices and potential health hazards are complicated and
require in-depth
investigation to identify and resolve conflicts and
interpretation problems.
E. Degree 4 - The work is normally affected by the
activities of inspection staff and
requires adjustment to the laboratory unit's priorities to
meet changing
requirements and to respond to health hazard crisis
situations.
F. Degree 4 - Contacts are with departmental officials to
negotiate and plan the
analytical program, with scientists to plan and conduct joint
investigations and
method development projects, and with scientists and officials
of industry, other
federal and provincial agencies and the Department of Justice
to provide advice
based on a recognized expertise in the microbiological
analysis of foods.
G. Degree 4 - The work involves managing and directing
method development studies for
the microbiological analysis of foods, developing detailed
proposals, defining
objectives and providing guidance on experimental design; and
on the resolution of
unusual or difficult problems.
|
|
|
Degree
|
H. Degree 4 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the
principles and theories of food microbiology and of the
procedures and instrumental
techniques used for the microbiological analysis of foods, as
well as a good
knowledge of related food industry practices, statistical
sampling procedures,
relevant legislation, and management practices.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - The work requires the management of a food
microbiology laboratory unit
which is periodically reviewed for attainment of overall
objectives and achievement
of the operational plan.
B. Degree 4 - Scientific guidance of a general nature is
available from the Division
Chief. The work requires the resolution of difficult or
unusual problems in the
area of the microbiological analysis of foods, and specific
guidance may be obtained
from other specialists in the Branch.
C. Degree 4 - The work requires defining the objectives of
analytical investigations
and method development studies, and proposing alternative
approaches to resolve
unusual or difficult problems in the microbiological analysis
of foods.
D. Degree 4 - The approaches to conducting method
development studies, and
recommendations concerning National Science Committee project
planning of the
analytical specialist are reviewed for soundness of judgment.
Method development
proposals and recommendations of the Science Committee in the
area of food
microbiology are reviewed for acceptability.
E. Degree 3 - Food microbiology data and results,
conclusion and recommendations of own
staff are interpreted to determine compliance of food samples
with the provisions
and regulations of the Food an Drugs Act and to provide
meaningful information for
use in developing standards and regulations.
F. Degree 4 - Advice based on a recognized expertise in food
microbiology, sampling and
analysis of foods and of relevant legislation is provided to
scientists and
officials of the department, other federal and provincial
agencies and to the food
industry.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - The work requires the operational management
of professional staff
including one food microbiology specialist, and three
microbiologists as well as four
technicians.
B. Degree 4 - Allocates the use of equipment, supplies and
facilities for the food
microbiology laboratory unit.
C. Degree 4 - Assesses the resource and equipment
requirements for the work and develops
and recommends a detailed operational plan.
D. Degree 4 - Selects and negotiates for outside analytical
services relating costs to
benefits and makes recommendations to the Division Chief.
E. Degree 4 - Controls and coordinates project schedules,
establishes quality assurance,
quantity, timeliness and safety standards and directs
assignments to meet priorities
and objectives.
F. Degree 4 - Coordinates the provision of analytical
services, special investigations,
National Science Committee work and the provision of advice
with the work of national
compliance officers and inspection and Laboratory staff in own
and other regions.
G. Degree 4 - Develops and implements Occupational Health
and Safety directives and
guidelines for the Laboratory unit. Identifies deficiencies in
operational and
administrative procedures, recommends changes, and ensures
their implementation.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Impact of Recommendations and
Activities
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice and decisions have a
direct impact on the quality
of food microbiology analysis, methods development and the
outcome of investigations
as well as on the development of standards and regulations and
the effectiveness of
regulatory programs.
B. Degree 4 -
(i) Degree 3 - The identification of violations of the Food
and Drugs Act may
result in the regulatory control of commercial food products,
and
recommendations and advice on the design and implementation of
national
compliance projects may lead to economic or technological
effects on the food
industry.
(ii) No significant impact.
(iii) Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice or consultations
contribute to the
development of standards and regulations for microbiological
contaminants in
food, and decisions and recommendations affect the regulatory
control of foods
containing violative levels of microbiological
contaminants.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 4 - Development of approaches, and the management
and direction of method
development projects, as well as the interpretation and
evaluation of analytical
data contribute knowledge and improved understanding of the
levels of
microbiological contaminants in the Canadian food supply and
of the methods for
their analysis.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART Chief, Food
Laboratory
- Head - Food Chemistry Unit
- Head - Food Chemistry Unit
- Head - Mycotoxins and Food Additives
Unit
- Head - Drug Microbiology Unit
* - Head - Food Microbiology Laboratory Unit BI-4
- Specialist, Food Microbiology BI-3
- Microbiologists (2) BI-2
- Microbiologist, Development Grade (1) BI-1 -
Technicians (4)
- Lab. Support (2)
* Bench-mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION
DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 19
|
Level: 4
|
Descriptive Title: Head, Fish and Marine Mammal Management
Division
|
|
Reporting to the Manager, Arctic Resource
Assessment Section:
Establishes annual program goals, requirements and priorities
with the Section Manager and, as applicable, through discussions
with other division heads and territorial, provincial and federal
officials, and prepares financial and operational plans for
approval.
Develops, discusses with the Section Manager
and implement a schedule of long- and short-term studies to
generate scientific information on selected water bodies and on
the dynamics of selected species of fish and marine mammal
populations. Plans and directs the operational program of
biological studies and co-ordinates scientific studies conducted
by staff and with other Branches of the Department and of the
Government of the Northwest Territories (N.W.T.) to provide a
scientific basis for the management and development of the fish
and marine mammal resources, and the overall management of the
exploitation by subsistence, commercial and sport fisheries in
the Western Region with emphasis in the N.W.T. and in accordance
with the Fisheries Act and the Regulations pertaining to the
N.T.W. fisheries and the protection of the Beluga, Walrus,
Narwhal and the Seals in the region.
Plans, directs and administers the program of
Fish and Marine Mammal Management for the N.T.W. Identifies,
designs and directs or co-directs cooperative projects or
biological studies and investigations concerning resource
management and development carried out with other Branches,
territorial or provincial agencies and industrial organizations.
Prepares and submits to various agencies and organizations,
proposals soliciting additional resources for the conduct of
planned studies or surveys. Organizes and directs co-operative
program projects involving participation of, and funding by the
Government of the N.W.T. and the General Development Agreement,
and coordinates program with activities of the industry.
Contributes, as a member representing area of
expertise in the department, to the work of various committees
and task forces to assess priority areas, discuss study results
and problems, or to advise on regional position regarding
technical matters, regulations, programs and policies, and to
develop proposals with other regions or agencies.
Allocates assignments and resources to staff,
reviews study plans and approaches, provides scientific direction
and technical guidance, monitors and control progress of studies
and the expenditure of funds, evaluates results and development
proposals for approval and makes recommendations for the
formulation of policies and new strategies, or regulatory changes
to address specific problems.
Provides advice to superiors on the management
and protection of the freshwater, anadromous, and marine fish and
mammal resources in the Western Region; studies other agencies'
fisheries management and development programs, reviews proposals
from commercial and other organization concerned with fisheries,
and analyses new scientific and technical advances for
applicability.
Identifies areas requiring studies and investigations;
determines and recommends projects requiring outside specialized
assistance and specifies requirements, advises on service
proposals and evaluates scientific content of reports by
consultants for completeness, relevance and technical merit.
Directs the preparation of reports on the status of particular
fish and marine mammal stocks, on population dynamics, strength
forecasts and implication for the exploitation. Formulates models
and projections for policies and strategies. Develops and
proposes action plans to provide the region with the capability
to respond to potential problems or resource-use allocation
issues in the N.W.T.
Prepares for approval amendments pertaining to harvest control
and management; drafts the annual Variation Notice under N.W.T.
Fishery Regulations, the negotiated annual marine mammal
subsistence harvest quotas, and the scientific permits for live
capture of marine mammals for approval-supervising and reporting
on capture; and, determines conditions for scientific permits
involving fish and marine mammal investigations by other agencies
or organizations. Reports on status of department regional
recommendations and on monitoring of related administrative
actions by other agencies affecting exploitation of the aquatic resources of the region.
Carries out supervisory and managerial duties, ensures that
administrative policy, directives and guidelines are followed and
participates to the staffing, classification, staff relations and
development processes, assesses staff performance and makes
recommendations.
Specifications
|
Degree
|
Kind of Assignments
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Annual objectives are established with the
Section Manager and are
broadly stated in terms of operational program goals and
strategies for the North
and of Directorate directives and policy statements.
B. Degree 4 - The work is performed within the area of fish
and marine mammal resource
management and development and involves biological as well as
chemical, physical and
economic and social considerations.
C. Degree 4 - The work requires developing, planning,
coordinating, directing, and
controlling internal and co-operative studies, controlling and
supervising work of
staff, controlling use of resources, providing advice,
evaluating, approving or
rejecting proposals and making recommendations for policy
formulation to the Section
Manager.
D. Degree 4 - The work requires planning, organizing,
coordinating or assigning complex
studies or projects to ensure that operational goals are
achieved within resource
limitations.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - There is a scarcity of pertinent information
and data in the literature.
Locations, in the north, to a large extend, have not been
studied ecologically and
the environment is fragile and species' life-cycles are
complex with slow growth
rates and low reproduction potential. Intensive investigation
is required to obtain
information under short summers and difficult climate
conditions over vast areas of
land and water or ice environment.
B. Degree 5 - Much of the information and data is unique
and cannot be verified by
other sources and requires difficult and complex experiments
due to severe climatic
conditions.
C. Degree 4 - The information and data is characterized by
variability and must be
carefully evaluated and interpreted before inclusion in
reports.
D. Degree 5 - The relationships between variables are often
conflicting, difficult to
quantify and often unknown (e.g., hunting patterns for walrus
related to weather,
ice conditions and migration patterns, etc.). Because of
resource use conflicts,
available information must be analyzed in the context of
likelihood of changes in
land-use pattern, industrial development, accessibility, and
economic and social
values.
|
|
|
Degree
|
E. Degree 4 - Work is affected by the activities of the
resource users and developers
and other scientists from provincial, universities and
industries. Consideration of
implications and coordination of the activities is
required.
F. Degree 4 - Contacts are with scientists and officials
outside the organizational
unit for arranging cooperative projects, implementing
regulations, negotiating
harvest quotas and for providing advice. Provides scientific
and technical
information to public inquiry committees.
G. Degree 4 - Conventional practices must often be modified
or abandoned and novel
approaches experimented and developed to achieve the desired
or expected resources
management and development results in the north.
H. Degree 4 - The work requires the application of a thorough
knowledge of the
principles and theories of biological sciences and fish and
marine mammal biology,
ecology and resource management, and an appreciation of
chemistry and physics,
including oceanography and climatology.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Normally, recommendations and conclusions are
accepted as to their
effectiveness. The work of the division is reviewed through
committees at regional
level to ensure that objectives are met within policy
guidelines. Reports and
reviews containing resource management strategies are referred
to scientists for
constructive criticism.
B. Degree 4 - Professional guidance for the resolution of
unusual and complex problems
can be obtained from other scientific authorities in the
Department.
C. Degree 4 - The work requires setting resources limitations
and objectives of
individual studies or projects and providing likely approaches
for the resolution of
difficult problems encountered by own staff.
D. Degree 4 - The work of subordinate staff, recommendations
and conclusions are
reviewed for soundness of judgment and effectiveness. Other
scientists' proposals
and studies related to the work are reviewed for applicability
and acceptability.
E. Degree 4 - Results of studies and projects of own staff
and consultants are reviewed
for soundness and acceptability, and interpreted to determine
the implications of
conclusions and recommendations on objectives of the Division
and significance in
terms of conservation of fish and marine mammal species.
F. Degree 4 - Authoritative advice is provided to scientists
and senior management of
the Department and to officials of the N.W.T. Government and
industries on the
management and development of exploitation, on the
conservation and protection of
freshwater and anadromous fish and marine mammal resources in
the N.W.T. and the
Artic waters, on the interpretation of policies and
directives, and on solutions of
problems.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - The work requires the operational management
of a staff comprised of
biologists, technicians and seasonal employees.
B. Degree 4 - Establishes priorities and allocates
equipment, supplies and facilities
to subordinates and controls the use.
C. Degree 4 - Forecasts short- and long-term resource
requirements and recommends plans for the acquisition, use and up-keep of equipment, facilities
and supplies and for the expenditure of funds to meet work priorities and
objectives.
|
|
Degree
|
D. Degree 4 - Negotiates and selects suitable sources of
outside assistance. Acts as
scientific authority concerning consultants on DSS contracts.
Several projects are
funded externally.
E. Degree 4 - Controls and coordinates projects, establishes
and implements performance
and safety standards and controls to meet priorities and
objectives. Exercises
co-administrative functions for pertinent activities with
other organizations
(e.g. N.W.T. Government's Test Fishery Program; D.F.O.
(Industrial Development
Branch).
F. Degree 4 - The work requires coordinating differing
activities with those of other
collaborating outside organizations e.g. RIE, World Wildlife
Fund, Petro Canada.
G. Degree 4 - The work requires recommending and developing
internal administrative and
safety directives based on knowledge of field conditions in
the north.
|
Impact of Recommendations and
Activities
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice or consultations
contribute to the development of
policies and decisions directly affects the development and
implementation of the
Fish and Marine Mammal programs, policy and related projects,
studies, guidelines
and directives for the Northwest Territories.
B. Degree 4 -
(i) Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice or decision have
economic impact on the
fisheries and mining or energy sectors of industry.
(ii) Degree 4 - Activities contribute directly to the
development of the policies
and affect the use and conservation of fish and marine mammal
resources over a
wide geographic area.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) Degree 3 - Negotiated subsistence harvest quotas have
economic and social
impacts on particular communities.
C. Degree 4 - Development of new concepts and approaches and
results of the work
contribute to the technology and scientific knowledge of
fisheries and marine mammal
resources development and management in Northern Canada, and
to an increased aware
ness and understanding by industries and other organizations
of the dangers of
ecological imbalance and over exploitation of the marine and
freshwater biotic
communities.
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
- Director General - Western Region
Manager - Artic Resource Assessment Section
- Head, Fish and
Marine Mammal Management Division BI-4
- Fishery Management Biologists BI-3
(2)
- Technicians EG-ESS-6 (5)
- Fishery Management Biologist BI-2
- Marine Mammal Management Biologists BI-3
(2)
- Technicians EG-ESS-6 (4) * Bench-mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 20
|
Level: 5
|
Descriptive Title: Senior Policy/Program Advisor, Marine
Fisheries
|
|
Reporting to the Associate Director, Resource
Assessment:
Develops, analyzes and recommends to senior
management, national policy strategies and procedures for the
management of Canada's marine renewable resources, evaluating
research information and data gathered by federal government
research scientists, provincial governments, universities and
international fishery research and management bodies, delineating
resource management problems, nature, magnitude and control
strategies in consultation with experts in several disciplines,
assessing efficacy of current strategies and applying modern
managerial concepts and techniques of program development and
management.
Identifies resource assessment and resource
management problems, and research program needs in consultation
with regional research managers and scientists and determines the
person-year and financial resource requirements for proposals and
recommendations.
Advises senior management, international
scientific bodies and senior officials of provincial governments
and fishing industry on resource management measures required for
the optimum utilization of the fishery resources and on trends
and projected abundance and availability of marine fish stocks on
a national basis, including the impact of management
interventions and alterations in fishing strategies upon yields
from the marine fish resources, keeping abreast of national and
international scientific development in population and ecosystem
dynamics and marine renewable resource management concepts.
Plans, develops, advises on implementation and
coordinates national resource assessment programs and research
activities related to marine fisheries to provide a rational
basis for the management of marine renewable resources and
co-ordinate regional inputs into national programs.
Evaluates the outputs from research programs
at research establishments across the country in relation to the
quantitative assessment of marine fish resources, analyzing,
assessing and interpreting programs results in relation to
objectives and national research needs and resources devoted.
Develops national resource forecasts of marine
resources availability and abundance, analyzing, assessing and
interpreting results of resource assessment investigations and
participating to study committees and task forces.
Assists in the development and coordination of
cooperative marine fisheries assessment programs with other
nations, developing in consultation with regional research
managers Canadian requirements for scientific resource assessment
input by other nations under Canadian fisheries management
within
200 miles, consulting with their scientists on
the levels of resources and commitments to be required as a
condition for fishing within the Canadian fishing zones, and
coordinating foreign and Canadian resource assessment
activities.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - Objectives of the work are stated by the
Associate Director, Resource
Assessment in terms of broad national policy for the
management of Canada's marine
fisheries.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 5 - The work involves developing concepts,
strategies and policies for the
management of Canada's marine fisheries involving a wide
spectrum of scientific
activities, and comprises a significant program activity.
C. Degree 5 - Activities involves the scientific evaluations
of national research
programs on marine fisheries assessment, making
recommendations and providing advice
on resource management, strategies and policy or legislation,
providing guidance on
the approaches to complex problems, evaluating outputs from
research programs, and
coordinating scientific resource assessment activities at the
national and
international levels.
D. Degree 5 - The work involves program conceptualization,
development, planning and
coordination of the several concurrent regional and
international marine fisheries
scientific assessment and research studies and contributes to
the formulation of
national policies on the management of marine fisheries.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - Must develop and coordinate cooperative
research programs with other
agencies and other nations for the scientific information and
data required to
provide a rational basis for the management of fisheries and
to construct comprehensive, multi-species and
interdisciplinary models simulating major fisheries
complexes and forecasting marine fish abundance.
B. Degree 5 - Much of the information and data is
extrapolated and hypothetical and not
completely validatable.
C. Degree 5 - Information and data obtained nationally from
many research establishments
in different regions and from other nations is highly variable
and often ambiguous,
and requires ingenuity and highly selective judgment to
use.
D. Degree 5 - For any given resource situation, a large
number of variables must be
considered and relationships among the variables are often
conflicting and difficult
to define and measure in the field of marine fish population
dynamics, assessment and
future trends predicting.
E. Degree 5 - The work of fisheries research of marine fish
assessments in other
provincial, international and commercial agencies affects the
body of information and
requires consideration of the implications of their activities
and findings.
F. Degree 5 - Contacts are with senior scientists and
officials at the national and
international levels to negotiate research program activities.
May represent the
department with the media on the subject of marine fish
management policies.
G. Degree 5 - The work requires approving and recommending
new procedures and research
proposals investigating new concepts and approaches, where few
precedents exist.
H. Degree 5 - The work requires the application of an
advanced knowledge of the
principles, theories and practices of marine fish biology and
a good knowledge of
related disciplines such as population dynamics, modelling,
marine ecology and marine
fish management practices, and modern commercial fishing
technology.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - Results of the work are evaluated in terms of
achievement of policy and
program objectives and the maintenance of a sustainable level
of marine fish stock
for commercial fisheries exploitation.
B. Degree 5 - Guidance is only received in terms Fisheries
and Marine Services policy
intent and overall national fisheries management objectives.
Professional guidance
may be received from other scientific authorities in other
countries.
|
|
|
Degree
|
C. Degree 5 - The work requires defining research
objectives for major projects on
marine fisheries resource assessment, defining conceptual
approaches to complex
resource assessment and resource management problems and
establishing scientific
guidelines.
D. Degree 5 - Recommendations and conclusions of
departmental and other scientists in
the resource assessment field are reviewed in terms of
validity and effectiveness as
well as implications to program direction, objectives and
national fisheries
management strategies both in the short-, and long-term.
E. Degree 5 - Results of studies, conclusions and
recommendations of scientists are
interpreted to determine their broad national implications on
fisheries resource
management and on the marine fish population status of various
species in different
locations.
F. Degree 5 - Authoritative advice and recommendations on
the status of marine fish
stocks and on marine fish management practices are provided to
senior management and
officials including the Assistant Deputy Minister.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 1 - Assigns work to non-subordinate staff as
applicable.
B. Degree 2 - Ensures proper use of allocated equipment,
supplies and facilities.
C. Degree 4 - Assesses the requirement for assessment
research commitments, develops
and recommends plans and develops proposals providing a
rationale for resources
needed and expenditure of funds to meet identified research
programs priorities and
objectives in support of the national marine fisheries
resources assessment
programs.
D. Degree 4 - Provide advice based on recognized expertise
on the requirements and
selection of outside scientific assistance.
E. Degree 1 - Complies with administrative procedures,
directives and guidelines
established for the work.
F. Degree 4 - Coordinates resource assessment programs
activities involving a number of
participating research establishments and scientists, and
coordinating inputs into
national programs to meet priorities and objectives of the
marine renewable resources
management.
G. Degree 3 - Interprets program management policy,
directives and guidelines and
implements managerial concepts and technique for the
development and management of
programs.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and
Activities
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - Results of the work, authoritative
recommendations and advice affect the
development of marine renewable resource management policies
and strategies, the
formulation of marine fish resource assessment programs and
the resource management
practices and regulations, and the development, initiation,
continuation and conduct
of the research programs activities.
B. Degree 5 -
(i) Degree 5 - Authoritative advice, recommendations and
results of the work have
far reaching short-, and long term effects upon the fishing
industry, on the
determination and allocation of quotas affecting the
deployment of the existing
fleet and expansion plans, and on the development of Canadian
fisheries as a
viable industry.
(ii) Degree 5 - Authoritative recommendations, advice and
consultations have a
substantial effect on the development of policies and
decisions affecting
the management of marine fish population, its conservation and
optimum
utilization as a renewable natural resource.
|
|
|
Degree
|
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 5 - The identification of research needs and
strategies, the development of
national resource assessment programs and the research studies
for the development
of concepts contribute to greater knowledge in the areas of
marine fish biology,
ecology and population dynamics for resource assessment and
management.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director, Fisheries Research Branch
- Associate Director - Research Planning and Analysis
- Associate Director - Resource Assessment
- Senior Policy/Program Advisor, Northern
and Inland Fisheries
- Senior Policy/Program Advisor, Marine
Mammals
- Senior Policy/Program Advisor, Fisheries
Ecology
- Senior Policy/Program Advisor, Anadromous
Fisheries
* - Senior Policy/Program Advisor, Marine Fisheries
(BI-5)
- Scientific Advisor, Resource
Evaluation
* Bench-mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION
DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 21
|
Level: 5
|
Descriptive Title: Head, Food Chemicals Section
|
|
Reporting to the Chief, Toxicological
Evaluation Division:
Acts as the Branch toxicological authority and
expert advisor on the safety and acceptability of chemicals which
may be intentionally or incidentally added to the Canadian food
supply.
Plans, directs and controls the activities of
the Section's staff to achieve the directorate's program
objectives, allocating work according to individuals' expertise
and experience and appraising all documents and reports prepared
by the Section. Coordinates the work of the Section with that of
other Sections, Divisions, Bureaus and Directorates. Recommends
the hiring of consultants when appropriate expertise is not
available or second opinion is required to resolve contentious
issues, and participates in the staffing of the Section.
Conducts and supervises the review, evaluation
and toxicological assessment of all pertinent information
contained in pre-market submissions from the food industry
requesting approval to use chemical additives or new products
containing potential contaminants proposed for the manipulation,
transformation, storage and packaging of foods. (The safety
assessment is from the viewpoint of protecting human health as
mandated by the Food and Drug Act and Regulations.) Correlates
scientific data collected from many other available sources
including major studies conducted in other countries, and
develops an overall assessment of the chemical's toxicity to
animals with reference to such factors as: carcinogenicity,
teratogenicity, reproductive toxicity, chronic toxicity,
immunotoxicity, developmental toxicity, mutagenicity and
comparative metabolism. Extopolates the results of laboratory
animal studies to humans (data collected in epidemiology studies,
occupational exposure studies and human trials may be available)
for the assessment of the toxicity/safety of the chemical which
may be intentionally or incidentally added to food, identifying
an acceptable daily intake (ADI) which represents the amount that
can be consumed daily by humans throughout their lives without an
appreciable risk to their health.
Provides authoritative advice, recommendations and
consultations on concerns relating to human health effects and
potential health hazards from chemicals present in food, to
senior departmental officials, other government departments,
national, provincial and international agencies, industry, the
media and the public.
Participates in the planning of research projects, studies and
experiments to be carried out in-house or by industry in order to
provide additional scientific data required to fully assess a
chemical's safety in food.
Recommends improvements in Branch policies and food
legislation to ensure consistency and fairness in the
implementation of the Food and Drug Act and Regulations to all
segments of the food industry.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kind of Assignments
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - Objectives of the work are stated in terms of
goals for the department's
national program of safe chemicals in foods in the Canadian
marketplace.
B. Degree 5 - The work involves the provision of
authoritative advice on the toxicology
of a broad range of chemicals added to food, to improve
various desirable characteristics or through contact with
food during processing and packaging and the formulation of their
safety in terms of (ADI) acceptable daily intake.
|
|
|
Degree
|
C. Degree 5 - The variety of activities involves a broad
spectrum of scientific
(toxicology is a multi-disciplinary science) and
administrative duties which include
evaluating major animal toxicity studies, making
recommendations, providing authoritative advice on policy
and legislation, providing guidance to internal and external
agencies on the determination of approaches to complex
problems and participating in
the planning of internal and external research projects.
D. Degree 5 - The work requires planning, coordinating and
implementing a national food
chemical safety assessment program and the formulation of
national Food guidelines
(ADI) and departmental policies in support of the Food and
Drug Act and Regulations.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - The work requires coordinating the collection
and selection of
toxicological information and data on intentionally or
incidentally added chemicals
which are usually obtained with great difficulty and expense
to industry through the
conduct of prolonged complex animal studies carried out by
multidisciplinary teams
and the subsequent evaluation or supervision of evaluation of
results, preparation
of reports and recommendations as to the chemical's toxicity.
Human data is sometimes
available on the effects of exposure to the chemical.
B. Degree 5 - Information and data on animal toxicity
studies required for pre-market
clearance are generated over several years of experimentation.
Integrity of data may
not be completely validatable, and studies are very costly and
time consuming to
repeat. The validity of the extrapolation of results to humans
can frequently not
be validated.
C. Degree 5 - Information and data on a wide variety of
chemicals in foods and their
toxicological properties obtained involve many intra- and
inter-species variables and
interactions and their use in safety assessment
requires ingenuity and highly
selective judgment.
D. Degree 5 - Many of the toxicological parameters measured
and assessed are
interrelated and their significance to human health often
results in conflicting
viewpoints.
E. Degree 5 - The work of the Toxicological Evaluation
Division is directly affected by
the activities and deliberations of senior scientists and
officials from the food
industry pressing for acceptance of their food products on the
Canadian market and
requires full consideration of their supporting data. The work
may also be affected
by the actions of other agencies, both national and
international.
F. Degree 5 - Contacts are with scientists and senior
officials of the department to
plan and coordinate evaluation studies for providing
authoritative advice, and with
senior scientists and officials of other federal, provincial
and international food
regulatory agencies, for exchanging information and advice on
the acceptability of
certain chemicals in food.
G. Degree 4 - The work requires developing and implementing
improved approaches and
procedures for the identification of hazards and safety
assessment of chemicals which
are present in foods. For example, staying abreast with the
latest findings on the
process of carcinogenesis requires continuous study.
H. Degree 5 - The work requires the application of an
advanced knowledge of the
principles, theories and practices of toxicology (a relatively
new and developing
multidisciplinary science) and a good knowledge of the
chemistry of products utilized
by the food processing industry. A basic knowledge of
epidemiology is required.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Professional Responsibility
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - Results of the work are evaluated in terms of
the effectiveness of the
advice provided in support of food safety policies, including
the pre-market safety
assessment of food additives, and departmental program
objectives.
B. Degree 5 - Guidance is received from the Chief on policy
intent and program
implications. Professional guidance may be received on
toxicological problems from
other scientific authorities in the Branch or colleagues
involved in similar work in
other countries.
C. Degree 5 - For each new chemical introduced into the food
industry, the work requires
defining the objectives of the evaluation process, developing
conceptual approaches
to ensure all aspects of the required animal studies are
adequately assessed and
that the evaluation takes into account all potential human
health problems and requires
establishing scientific guidelines in terms of national
ADI.
D. Degree 5 - Toxicity study evaluation reports and,
recommendations and conclusions of
own staff are reviewed for validity, effectiveness and
consistency with current
toxicological and risk assessment principles along with
established Department
policies and guidelines. Major studies or activities of other
scientists from the
Branch or from the food industry are evaluated for
applicability to own program
objectives.
E. Degree 5 - Results of major laboratory animal and
epidemiology studies presented in
the submission for pre-market clearance of food chemicals and
all other pertinent
information are interpreted to determine and identify any
toxicological hazards which
may impact on the Branch's Food chemical safety programs.
F. Degree 5 - Authoritative advice and recommendations are
provided to senior officials
of the department on all aspects relating to the safety of
chemicals in food and the
enforcement of regulations to protect the health of Canadian
consumers.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - The work requires the operational management
of a varying number of
toxicologists with various specialties carrying out safety
evaluation of chemicals
which may be found in foods.
B. Degree 2 - Ensures the proper use of allocated equipment,
supplies and facilities.
C. Degree 4 - Assesses requirements, develops and recommends
plans for research studies
required to meet work priorities and evaluation
objectives.
D. Degree 4 - Assesses the requirement for outside
assistance and recommends the hiring
of appropriate consultants when expertise is not available
within the Branch to
resolve contentious issues.
E. Degree 4 - Controls and coordinates the work of
toxicologists with responsibility for
pre-market safety assessments of food chemicals and
recommending standards for these
chemicals to meet priorities and Branch's objectives.
F. Degree 4 - Coordinates activities of the Section with
those of toxicology research
groups from the Branch or from the food industry.
G. Degree 2 - Implements office administrative
procedures.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - Authoritative recommendations, advice or
consultations affect the
development of departmental compliance policies and national
food safety guidelines.
Recommendations affect programs in other departments which
have a Food component.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 5 -
|
|
(i) Degree 4 - Recommendations, activities and advice (i.e.
approving or not
approving the introduction of a new chemical, extending an old
chemical use
pattern) have economic or technological effects on the food
industry, affecting
a broad range of products, processes or operations.
(ii) No significant impact.
(iii) Degree 5 - Authoritative recommendations, advice or
consultations have a
substantial effect on the development of the Department's
public health or
safety policies and national food safety guidelines.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 5 - Decisions and recommendations affect the
initiation, continuation or
orientation of toxicological studies or research projects to
acquire new knowledge
on the toxicity of chemicals in food.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
- Director, Bureau of Chemical Safety
Chief, Toxicological Evaluation Division - Head,
Agricultural Chemicals Section
- Head, Food Contaminants Section
* - Head, Food Chemicals Section BI-5
- Toxicologists BI-4 and 3
(3 to 5 PY's available as required)
* Bench-mark position
|
|