Alternate Format(s)
|
|
Classification Standard - PC - Physical Sciences
CONTENTS
|
|
INTRODUCTION
|
CATEGORY DEFINITION
|
GROUP DEFINITION
|
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
|
FACTORS AND FACTOR CHARACTERISTICS
|
DEFINITIONS OF FACTORS AND FACTOR CHARACTERISTICS,
DEGREES, AND NOTES TO RATERS
|
POSITION LEVELS: TYPICAL DISTINGUISHING FEATURES
|
LIST OF BENCH-MARK POSITIONS
|
BENCH-MARK POSITIONS: RATING SUMMARY
BENCH-MARK POSITIONS: DESCRIPTIONS, SPECIFICATIONS
AND RATINGS
|
INTRODUCTION
This standard describes the plan to be used to classify
positions allocated to the Physical Sciences. Group. It consists
of an introduction, definitions of the Scientific and
Professional Category and the occupational group, a glossary of
terms, factor definitions, characteristics and degree highlights,
and
bench-mark position descriptions.
The ultimate objective of job evaluation is the
determination of the relative values of jobs in each occupational
group. A classification plan of five levels, representing
significant differences in the difficulty of the work, has been
established for this group. Jobs assigned to a given level are
regarded as being of equal difficulty.
Factors
The evaluation of positions and their assignment to a
classification level will be determined by the application of
five factors:
Kind of Assignments
Complexity of Work Professional Responsibility Management
Responsibility
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
Each factor is described, and the descriptions
designate the features of the work assigned to positions
allocated to the group.
Factor Characteristics
The factor characteristics are shown under each
factor. The characteristics indicate the features of the work
that are to be considered when evaluating a position under a
particular factor.
Highlights which describe and distinguish the
increasing difficulty of the work from the lowest to the highest
degree, are provided for the five degrees of each factor
characteristics. These highlights describe the features of the
work that will be found in most positions.
Bench-mark Positions
Bench-mark positions exemplify the degrees of
the characteristics, the degrees of each factor and the levels of
the classification plan. Each bench-mark consists of a
descriptive title, a series of statements of the principal
duties, and a set of specifications describing the features of
the work of the position in terms of the characteristics of each
of the five factors. The specifications exemplify the application
of the evaluation plan to the duties and responsibilities of the
bench-mark position and substantiate the degree assigned to the
position for the characteristics and the factors. A
classification level is assigned to each bench-mark position.
Use of the Standard
There are six steps in the application of this
classification standard.
1. The position description is studied to ensure
understanding of the position as a whole and of the nature of the
duties and responsibilities as they relate to the characteristics
of each factor. The relationship of the position being studied to
positions above and below it in the organization is also studied.
2. Allocation of the position to the category and group is
confirmed by reference to the definitions and the descriptions of
inclusions and exclusions.
3. A degree under each of the factor characteristics is
tentatively assigned to the position being evaluated, by
considering the duties and responsibilities of the position in
relation to the degrees described for the factor characteristics,
and attributing to the position the degree whose definition best
reflects the conditions that are typical of the work of the
position and most closely corresponds to its difficulty in terms
of the characteristic. The degree tentatively assigned is
confirmed by comparison with the bench-mark position descriptions
and rating specifications for the characteristic.
4. A degree under each factor is assigned to the position.
The degree to be assigned for a factor is determined by the
degree which predominates for the factor's characteristics. When
one degree does not predominate, the raters are to compare the
overall intensity of the requirements of the position with
respect to the various characteristics of the factor with the
bench-mark positions, and attribute to the position the factor
degree that best equates, on the whole, to the bench-mark
positions.
5. The level of the position is determined by the degree
that has been assigned to the position for at least three of the
five factors. When one degree does not predominate, raters are to
compare the total job with the bench-mark positions and determine
the level that best corresponds, on the whole, with the duties
and responsibilities of the position.
6. The position is compared with bench-mark positions that
have been assigned to the same level, as a check on the validity
of the level selected.
Guide
A Guide identifying a series of distinguishing features
characterizing positions found typical of each level is included
in the standard.
Organization Chart
A succinct linear organization chart completes the description
of the position and shows the reporting/control relationships
that are significant to the rating of the position.
CATEGORY DEFINITION
Occupational categories were repealed by the Public Service Reform Act (PSRA), effective April 1, 1993. Therefore, the occupational category definitions have been deleted from the classification standards.
GROUP DEFINTION
For occupational group allocation, it is recommended that you use the Occupational
Group Definition and the
Occupational Sub-group Definition Maps, which provide the
2005 group and sub-group definition and their corresponding inclusion and exclusion statements. The maps explicitly link the relevant parts of the overall
2005 occupational sub-group definition to each classification standard.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
For the purpose of this standard -
Behavior of Earth - Refers to the
activities of earth and its properties to include plate
tectonics, magnetism, volcanism, erosion, sedimentation and
similar processes which result in the formation,
transformation and change in behavior of the planet.
Behavior of Matter - Refers to the
properties and interactions of matter and energy.
Behavior of Space - Refers to the activities of cosmic
dust, gas and sub-atomic particles under the influence of
magnetic, electro-magnetic and gravitational forces in space.
Conflicting Interests - Refers to different
opinions or points of view that lead to a confrontation between
individuals or organizations in respect of the advantageous or
detrimental results of a contemplated action.
Continuing Operation - Refers to tasks or
investigations, usually of an ongoing nature or occurring in a
pattern or in repetitive cycles.
Contracts/Agreements (Evaluating of)-
Refers to the critical examination of contract/agreement
proposals or work done under contract for scientific merit or
quality and the provision of a recommendation of acceptance with
or without modifications or rejection.
Earth Sciences - Refers to a group of disciplines
concerned with the study of Planet Earth, such as geology,
mineralogy, hydrology, glaciology, seismology; physical
geography, (physical) pedology, physical oceanography, (physical)
limnology, geophysic, geochemistry and climatology.
Energy - Refers to the capacity to do work, kinetic,
potential or radiant and includes forms such as: gravitational,
thermal; chemical; electrical; nuclear; solar; wind;
hydrolic.
Force - Refers to a physical entity causing or
attempting to cause a change in the motion, velocity,
configuration or the state of matter.
Implications of External Matters - Refers
to the difficulty added to the work because of the need to
recognize the interests of others, including those over whom
little effective influence can be exercised.
Matter - Refers to substances in the form of solid,
liquid, gas or plasma.
Organizational Control - Refers to the control
over a staff and its work that is exercised through an
established organizational structure by means of which levels of
responsibility and authority are clearly identified.
Organizational Unit - In terms of size, refers
to that which makes up or is understood to be encompassed by
"normal span of supervisory control of professionals". - As
illustrated by bench-mark positions, the number of staff is
normally a function of the nature/complexity, conditions and
requirements of the work as well as of the type of organizational
structure applied.
Outside Assistance - Refers to temporary
assistance needed for the work and which must be obtained from
sources ranging from outside the immediate organizational unit to
organizations outside the Public Service.
N.B. Some of the terms defined in this Glossary are not used
in this standard. However, the definitions of such terms can help
ensure consistency where their use may be indicated.
Physical Properties- Refers to those attributes of
matter and energy which are studied in the Physical Sciences.
PhysicalSciences - Refers to a collection of
natural sciences excluding chemistry and biology but including
other physical sciences disciplines pertinent to "physics",
"earth sciences" and "planetary sciences".
Physics - Refers to the science which deals with the
study of the properties and interactions of matter and energy,
including the study of: the mechanics and dynamics of solids,
liquids and gases; gravitation; electricity; magnetism;
electro-magnetic waves; optics; acoustics; heat; radiation;
atomic and nuclear phenomena. It also includes the application of
the principles of physics to biological, chemical and geological
systems.
Planetary Sciences- Refers to a group of disciplines
concerned with the study of the structure, composition, and
physical (and chemical) properties of planets including their
atmosphere and immediate cosmic environment. Astronomy,
astrophysics, and geology are disciplines included in that group
of disciplines.
Policy - Refers to a declaration of aims and intent
established by legislation or ministerial authority to guide
future courses of action.
Program - Refers to the general plan designed to
achieve the objectives determined by a department or agency to
meet the aims and intent of policy.
Project - Refers to a unit of work for which objectives
have been defined and which is circumscribed by budgetary
controls, time limits and the availability of resources.
Related Fields- Refers to general or specialized
fields that are pertinent to or associated with the work of
professionals in the physical sciences.
Significant Program Activity - Refers to
that portion of a scientific based program which is visible as an
entity and is comparable to work at the senior management level
but with emphasis on the scientific nature of the work.
Specialized Subject Area- Refers to a "subject area" in
which there is a narrowing of scope and the work to be performed
necessitates an enhanced development of knowledge and
experience.
Standards- Refers to:
(i) A recognized weight, measure or material of specified
composition or characteristics, or experimental procedure used as
a reference for uniform measurement, comparison or
calibration;
(ii) A set of recognized criteria (mandatory or voluntary)
specifying a minimum level of quality, purity, uniformity,
performance, or safety for the manufacture, use or handling of a
material, product, or device.
Studies- Refers to an in-depth examination or
investigation of an area of interest.
Subject areas - Refers to the facts, theories, ideas,
techniques and related matters that are encompassed by a study,
investigation, project or program, and include the application of
one or more disciplines.
Supervisory Responsibility- Refers to the
responsibility for scheduling and allocating work, instructing,
training, controlling and assessing performance of other
employees and for ensuring satisfactory completion of their
work.
Survey- Refers to a general or broad examination of an
area of interest.
N.B. Some of the terms defined in this Glossary are not used in
this standard. However, the definitions of such terms can help
ensure consistency where their use may be indicated.
FACTORS AND FACTOR CHARACTERISTICS
FACTOR
((KIND OF ASSIGNMENT»
((COMPLEXITY OF WORK»
((PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY»
|
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
|
CHARACTERISTICS
Objectives established by
others for the work;
Extent of the work;
Variety of activities;
Scope for planning and
conducting work.
Availability and problems
involved in obtaining
information and data;
Validity of information and
data;
Number and variability of the
variables and ambiguity of
information and data;
Relationships of the
variables;
Effect of activities of others
on the work;
Nature and purpose of
contacts;
Development of concepts and
approaches, procedures,
techniques and practices,
their adaptation and
application;
Theoretical knowledge which
must be applied.
Extent work is checked by
others;
Professional guidance
received;
Initiative and judgment in
defining objectives, dealing
with problems and establishing
scientific guidelines;
Judgment in reviewing and
assessing work of others;
Judgment in interpreting
results of work;
Judgment in giving advice.
|
FACTOR
((MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY»
((IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATIONS
AND ACTIVITIES»
|
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
a)
b)
c)
|
CHARACTERISTICS
(Responsibility for:)
Control of staff;
Control of physical
resources;
Committing departmental
resources;
Obtaining outside
assistance;
Administrative control of
work;
Co-ordination of work
performed for, or in
conjunction with other
organizational units;
Implementing or developing
administrative procedures,
safety and management
directives and guidelines.
(Impact - Governmental)
On departmental work or
other government program;
(Imp act - External)
(i} On an industrial or
commercial process,
operation or product;
(ii) On the state of
natural resources or
the environment;
(iii) On public health and
safety;
(iv) On other external
areas.
On development and
understanding of a body of
knowledge.
|
FACTOR: "KIND OF ASSIGNMENT"
This factor is used to measure the difficulty of the work in
terms of its objectives and extent, the variety of activities and
the scope for planning and conducting work.
Notes to Raters
i) When evaluating a position under this factor, raters are to
consider the factor characteristics and their intensity ranging
from degree 1 to degree 5, and attribute to the position, for
each characteristic, the degree whose definition best reflects
the conditions that are typical of the work of the position and
most closely corresponds to the intensity of its requirements in
terms of the characteristic.
ii) For a same degree of intensity, all of the
characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
iii) The degree to be assigned to the position for the
whole factor, is determined by the degree which predominates
(i.e. the degree that has been assigned for at least three of the
four characteristics - "A", "B", "C" and "D"). When one degree
does not predominate, raters are to compare the overall intensity
of the requirements of the position under the factor with that of
the bench-mark positions, and determine and attribute to the
position the degree which best equates to the bench-mark
positions.
DEGREE 1
|
DEGREE 2
|
DEGREE 3
|
DEGREE 4
|
DEGREE 5
|
Characteristic A: The objectives
|
established by others for
|
the conduct of the work.
|
|
|
Objectives and
instructions are provided
for the work.
|
Objectives of the work are
clearly defined.
|
Objectives of the work are
defined in terms of
activity or project goals.
|
Objectives of the work are
stated in terms of
operational goals.
|
Objectives of the work are
stated in terms of goals
for a significant program
activity.
|
Characteristic B: The extent
Work normally consists of
a part or phase of a
project, study or
continuing operation
requiring limited
investigation.
|
of the work.
Work normally consists of
a number of discrete
projects, studies or
investigations.
|
Work involves
comprehensive investigations, projects or studies
within a specialized
subject area.
|
Work involves the
application of a number of
scientific principles and
theories to complex investigations or studies, within
a specialized subject
area; or the direction of
work in diverse subject
areas.
|
Work is performed within a
number of related specialized subject areas and
comprises a significant
program activity.
|
Characteristic C: The variety
|
of activities.
|
|
|
|
Activities closely
resemble one another in
most aspects and consist
of a limited number of
straight-forward tasks
performed successively.
|
Activities differ from one
another and consist of a
variety of tasks such as:
using a number of related
scientific techniques for
surveying, observing,
analyzing and evaluating
products, phenomena or
processes; investigating
the composition, performance
or effect of
substances; allocating
work to support staff;
providing advice.
|
Activities differ from one
another and include using
a wide variety of scientific techniques for investigating the
composition,
performance or effect of
substances or systems; or
supervising the work of
staff engaged in the
conduct of analyses or
investigations; and
providing advice.
|
Activities differ from one
another in many aspects
and include several of the
following: conducting
complete investigations;
providing functional
direction; coordinating
the work with other activities; providing advice;
organizing, controlling
and supervising the work
of staff engaged in the
conduct of analyses or
investigations; controlling the use of facilities, materiel
and human resources.
|
Activities involving a
broad spectrum of
scientific and administrative duties which differ
from one another in most
aspects and include:
evaluating and authorizing
projects or studies; making
recommendations or providing advice on policy or
legislation; assessing the
implications of work
progress on program objectives; providing guidance
on the determination of
approaches to complex
problems; and managing a
significant program
activity, or coordinating
activities at the national
and international levels.
|
Characteristic D: The scope
|
for planning and conducting work.
|
|
|
|
Scheduling and performing
work using standardized
procedures and techniques.
|
Planning activities,
determining approaches and
selecting methods to ensure
that the work meets clearly
defined objectives.
|
Planning and performing a
broad diversity of work
within a subject area, or
planning and assigning
tasks for the ongoing work
of an organizational unit,
or a project or study team
to ensure that the objectives are met within
established guidelines.
|
Planning, organizing and
delegating work of a
number of organizational
units, or planning and
coordinating complex
projects or studies to
ensure that operational
goals are achieved within
resources limitations; or
planning, organizing and
conducting complex
projects or studies within
a specialized area with
high degree of freedom and
latitude.
|
Planning, coordinating and
implementing a significant
program activity or major
scientific studies.
|
FACTOR: "COMPLEXITY OF WORK"
This factor is used to measure the difficulty of the work in
terms of the nature of the information and data used; the
influences external to the work; the nature and purpose of
contacts with others; the requirement for the development of
concepts and approaches, procedures, techniques and practices,
their adaptation and application; and, the theoretical and
practical knowledge which must be applied.
Notes to Raters
(i) When evaluating positions under this factor, raters are to
consider the factor characteristics and their intensity ranging
from degree I to degree 5, and attribute to the position, for
each characteristic, the degree; whose definition best reflects
the conditions that are typical of the work of the position and
most closely corresponds to the intensity of its requirements in
terms of the characteristic.
(ii) For a same degree of intensity, all of
the characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
(iii) The degree to be assigned to the position for the whole
factor, is determined by the degree which predominates (i.e. the
degree that has been assigned for at least five of the eight
characteristics - "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G" and "H").
When one degree does not predominate, raters are to compare the
overall intensity of the requirements of the position under the
factor, with that of the bench-mark positions, and determine and
attribute to the position the degree which best equates to the
bench-mark positions.
DEGREE 1
|
DEGREE 2
|
DEGREE 3
|
DEGREE 4
|
DEGREE 5
|
Characteristic A: The availability
|
of, and the problems involved
|
in obtaining information and
|
data.
|
|
The work requires
obtaining or receiving
information and data from
easily accessible sources.
|
The work requires
obtaining information and
data by direct observation, collection or selection from
established recognized sources.
|
The work requires
obtaining, by investigation, information and data which are
often difficult to obtain, interpret and select. Sources may be
identified from past
practices or guidelines.
|
The work requires
obtaining, by intensive
investigation, information and data which are often difficult
to obtain, interpret and select. Sources are difficult to
identify and to access.
|
The work requires
coordinating the collection and selection of information
and data which are usually obtained with
great difficulty and
require the conduct of
intensive study and
investigation. Sources
are likely to be obscure
or have to be developed.
|
Characteristic B: The validity
|
of information and data.
|
|
|
|
Information and data of
known validity are obtained
from recognized reliable
sources or by standardized
procedures.
|
Information and data can
normally be validated by
known procedures or
literature references.
|
Information and data can
normally be validated by a combination of experimentation and
detailed literature referencing or further field
investigations.
|
Information and data can
be validated only by
difficult or complex
investigations.
|
Information and data may
not be completely
validatable.
|
Characteristic C: The number
|
and variability of the variables
|
and the ambiguity of information
|
and data.
|
|
Information and data are
characterized by few
variables, low variability, lack of ambiguity and
are of known implications.
|
Information and data are
characterized by several
variables requiring
interpretation, but of
known implications and
variability.
|
Information and data can
be characterized by
several variables requiring interpretation, poorly
defined variability and
some ambiguity.
|
Information and data can
be characterized by variability, many variables, difficulty of
interpretation, and the need for judgment to use the
data.
|
Information and data are
characterized by high
variability, many variables, ambiguity, and require
ingenuity and highly selective judgment to use.
|
Characteristic D: The relationships
|
of the variables.
|
|
|
|
Relationships between the
variables are simple and
known.
|
Relationships between the
variables can be established and inconsistencies
resolved by straight-
forward investigation.
|
Relationships between
variables are sometime
conflicting and require
investigation and
interpretation.
|
Relationships between
variables are complicated
and require in-depth
investigation to identify
and resolve conflicts and
interpretation problems.
|
Relationships between
variables are often
conflicting and difficult
to define and measure.
|
Characteristic E: The effect
|
of the activities of others on
|
the work.
|
|
|
Limited effects from the
activities of others within
the organizational unit.
|
Work is normally affected
by the activities of
others within the organizational unit and occasionally by the
activities
of others outside the
organizational unit.
|
Work is frequently
affected by the
activities of scientists
and officials outside the
organizational unit.
|
Work is normally affected
by the activities of
scientists and officials
outside the organizational
unit, and requires consideration of the implication of their
activities
on a project or the
ongoing activity.
|
The work of a significant
program activity is
affected by the activities
of other organizations or
agencies and requires
consideration of the
implications of the
activities of their
senior scientists or
officials.
|
FACTOR:COMPLEXITY OF
WORK(CONT'D)
DEGREE 1
|
DEGREE 2
|
DEGREE 3
|
DEGREE 4
|
DEGREE 5
|
Characteristic F: The nature
|
and purpose of contacts with
|
others.
|
|
|
Contacts are with others
within own organizational
unit for obtaining and
discussing information.
|
Contacts are with others
working in the same or
closely related subject
areas for obtaining and
exchanging information
and discussing problems.
May provide information
and facts to the public
and the media.
|
Contacts are with scientists and officials for obtaining and
exchanging information, participating in cooperative
projects, resolving problems, and providing advice. May
explain
on-going activities and objectives of the work and exchange
information with the public and the
media.
|
Contacts are with
scientists and officials
outside the organizational
unit for arranging co-
operative projects,
negotiating terms of
agreements, establishing
standards, implementing
regulations, and for
providing advice based on
recognized expertise. May
provide scientific and
technical information to
the public and the media
on contentious issues.
|
Contacts are with senior scientists and officials at the
national and international levels at meetings where
conflicting interest are represented, and agreement
affecting a significant program activity are negotiated. May
represent the department at public forums and with the media.
|
Characteristic G: The requirement
application.
|
for the development of concepts
|
and approaches, procedures,
|
techniques and practices,
|
their adaptation and
|
The work involves applying
conventional practices,
techniques and procedures.
Minor adaptations may be
required.
|
The work requires adapting
practices, techniques, and
procedures.
|
The work requires
developing new techniques
and procedures using known
approaches and existing
precedents.
|
The work requires
developing new procedures
and techniques using
novel approaches where
precedents often do not
exist.
|
The work requires approving or recommending new procedures and
developing new concepts and
approaches. Work is characterized by the absence of
precedents.
|
Characteristic H: The theoretical
|
and practical knowledge
|
which must be applied.
|
|
|
The work requires the
application of a sound
knowledge of the
principles and theories of
a discipline and some
familiarity with its
practices.
|
The work requires the
application of a sound
knowledge of the principles, theories and practices of a
discipline and some familiarity with the practices in related
disciplines.
|
The work requires the
application of a thorough
knowledge of the
principles, theories and
practices of a subject
area and its pertinent
disciplines, and familiarity with the practices in related
disciplines, subject areas or
supervisory practices.
|
The work requires the
application of a thorough
knowledge of the
principles, theories and
practices of a specialized
subject area, and a
knowledge of related
scientific disciplines,
subject areas or of
management practices.
|
The work requires the
application of an advanced
knowledge of the principles, theories and practices of a
specialized subject area, and a
good knowledge of related
scientific disciplines, subject areas or of management
practices.
|
FACTOR: "PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY"
This factor is used to measure the difficulty
of the work in terns of the checks and controls over the work and
the professional leadership received. It is also used to measure
the requirement to exercise initiative and professional judgment
in defining objectives and dealing with problems, and I
establishing scientific guidelines; and judgment in reviewing and
assessing the work of others, interpreting results, findings and
recommendations, and in providing advice.
Notes to Raters
(1) When evaluating a position under this factor, raters are
to consider the factor characteristics and their intensity
ranging from degree 1 to degree 5, and attribute to the position,
for each characteristic, the degree whose definition best
reflects the conditions that are typical of the work of the
position and most closely corresponds to the intensity of its
requirements in terms of the characteristic.
(ii) For a same degree of intensity, all of the
characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
(iii) The degree to be assigned to the position for the whole
factor, is determined by the degree which predominates (i.e. the
degree that has been assigned for at least four of the six
characteristics - "A", "B" "C", D", "E" "F"). When one degree
does not predominate, raters are to compare the overall intensity
of the requirements of the position under the factor, with that
of the bench-mark positions, and determine and attribute to the
position the degree which best equates to the bench-mark
positions.
DEGREE 1
|
DEGREE 2
|
DEGREE 3
|
DEGREE 4
|
DEGREE 5
|
Characteristic A: The extent
|
to which work is checked by others.
|
|
|
|
Work is reviewed for
consistency and accuracy
while in progress and on
completion.
|
Work is accepted as
technically accurate. Work
assignments and conclusions
are reviewed for
consistency and
completeness.
|
Work approaches,
recommendations and
conclusions are reviewed
for soundness of judgment
in terms of the attainment
of study or project
objectives.
|
Key recommendations and
conclusions are reviewed
for effectiveness. Results
are periodically reviewed
in terms of the attainment
of objectives.
|
Results are evaluated in
terms of achievement of
policy and program
objectives.
|
Characteristic B: The professional
|
guidance received.
|
|
|
|
Professional guidance is
received to assure correct
use of methods and
techniques.
|
Professional guidance is
received on new aspects of
the work.
|
Professional guidance is
received on the resolution
of difficult problems.
|
Professional guidance is
received on the resolution
of unusual and complex
problems.
|
Guidance is received on
policy intent and program
implications. Professional
guidance may be received
from other scientific
authorities.
|
Characteristic C: The requirement
guidelines.
|
to exercise initiative and
|
judgment in defining objectives
|
and dealing with problems
|
and establishing scientific
|
Work requires indicating
problems and selecting
methods, techniques actor-
ding to established
procedure manuals,
guidelines or precedents.
|
Work requires identifying
problems and determining
approaches and suitable
methods for their
resolution.
|
Work requires defining
objectives of studies,
identifying problems and
determining approaches for
the resolution of difficult
problems within own subject
area.
|
Work requires establishing
the limitations and defining the objectives of projects or
studies and indicating likely
approaches for the resolution of unusual and difficult
problems within related subject areas.
|
Work requires defining
objectives, developing
conceptual approaches to
complex problems and
establishing scientific
guidelines for a significant program activity.
|
Characteristic D: The requirement
|
to exercise judgment in
|
reviewing and assessing the work
|
of others.
|
|
Work of support staff is
checked for correct
application of procedures
and consistency of results.
|
The work of subordinate
staff is reviewed while in
progress and on completion
for technical accuracy.
External submissions are
reviewed for completeness
and compliance with data
requirements.
|
Work of subordinate staff or project team members is reviewed
for completeness and compliance with standards and guidelines.
Within own subject area, results and findings of other scientists
are
reviewed for validity or for applicability to own subject
area.
|
Work approaches,
recommendations and conclusions of subordinate staff or
project team members, are reviewed for soundness of judgment.
Other
scientists' proposals and
studies that are related to
own specialized subject
area, are reviewed for
acceptability.
|
Recommendations and
conclusions of staff are
reviewed in term of
validity and effectiveness
with respect to established
policy, directives, guide
lines and resource limitations. Major studies or
activities of other scientists are evaluated
with respect to own
program's objectives.
|
Characteristic E: The requirement
|
to exercise judgment in
|
interpreting results of work.
|
|
|
Own observations are
reviewed to ensure
reliability and
consistency.
|
Scientific observations and
results are interpreted to
produce meaningful information, conclusions, recommendations
or reports.
|
Complex scientific data or
results, conclusions and
recommendations of
subordinate staff or other
scientists are interpreted
to determine their meaning
and implications on work
activities.
|
Results of studies or
projects are interpreted to
determine the implications
of conclusions and recommendations on the objectives of own
work and
significance to related
scientific and other
activities.
|
Results of major studies,
conclusions and recommendations are interpreted to
determine their broad
implications on scientific
or other related activities
affecting a significant
program activity.
|
Characteristic F: The requirement
|
to exercise judgment in
|
giving advice.
|
|
|
Instructions and guidance
may be provided to support
staff on matters closely
related to the work
performed.
|
Advice is provided to
colleagues and support
staff on matters closely
related to own area of
work.
|
Specific technical advice
within own subject area is
provided to other
scientists and officials
and immediate superior.
Guidance on scientific
matters is provided to
subordinate staff or to
other scientists
contributing to the work.
|
Advice based on a
recognized expertise within
a specialized subject area,
is given to other
scientists and officials.
|
Authoritative advice and
recommendations in a number
of related specialized
subject areas affecting a
significant program
activity, are provided to
other scientists and senior
officials.
|
FACTOR: "MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY"
This factor is used to measure the difficulty
of the work in terms of the responsibility for committing,
controlling and managing resources; obtaining outside assistance;
controlling and coordinating work; and, for implementing or
developing procedures, directives and guidelines.
Notes to Raters
(i) When evaluating positions under this
factor, raters are to consider the factor's characteristics and
their intensity ranging from degree I
to degree 5, and attribute to the position, for each
characteristic, the degree whose definition best reflects the
conditions that are
typical of the work of the position and most closely corresponds
to the intensity of its requirements in terms of the
characteristic.
(ii) For a same degree of intensity, all of the
characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
(iii) The degree to be assigned to the position for the whole
factor, is determined by the degree which predominates (i.e. the
degree that has been assigned for at least four of the seven
characteristics - "A" "B" "C" "D", "E" "F", "G"). When one degree
does not predominate, raters are to compare the overall intensity
of the requirements of the position under the factor, with that
of the bench-mark positions, and determine and attribute to the
position the degree which best equates to the bench-mark
positions.
DEGREE 1
|
DEGREE 2
|
DEGREE 3
|
DEGREE 4
|
DEGREE 5
|
Characteristic A: Responsibility
|
for the control of staff.
|
|
|
|
The work occasionally
requires assigning work
to non-subordinate
support staff,
|
The work normally requires
supervision of support
staff.
|
The work requires the
supervision of a unit
normally including
professional staff.
|
The work requires the
operational management of
professional staff including specialists or
subordinate supervisors.
|
The work requires the
management and human
resources planning through
subordinate supervisors of
a large staff of
professionals.
|
Characteristic B: Responsibility
|
for the control of physical
|
resources.
|
|
|
Planning day-to-day use
of equipment and supplies
for own work.
|
Ensuring proper use of
allocated equipment,
supplies and facilities,
|
Controlling the use and
the maintenance of
allocated equipment,
supplies and facilities,
|
Allocating the use of
equipment, supplies and
facilities.
|
Planning, directing and
controlling the physical
resources allocated for a
significant program
activity.
|
Characteristic C: Responsibility
|
for committing departmental
|
resources.
|
|
|
Limited to the spending
of own time and the use
of materials and
equipment for own work.
|
Identifying the
requirement for equipment,
material and services for
assigned work.
|
Recommending the
acquisition of specific
equipment, material and
services to meet work
requirements,
|
Assessing requirements and
developing and recommending plans for the acquisition and use
of resources, and the expenditure of funds to meet work
priorities and
objectives.
|
Exercising delegated
authority under the
Financial Administration
Act for the acquisition of
resources and expenditure
of funds; or, providing
authoritative advice for
major expenditures or
commitments of depart
mental resources.
|
Characteristic D: Responsibility
|
for obtaining outside assistance.
|
|
|
|
Informing supervisor
concerning the need for
assistance.
|
Recommending on the need
for assistance,
|
Substantiating the need for, defining specific requirements,
and identifying suitable sources of assistance; and, arranging
for readily available assistance.
|
Selecting and negotiating for suitable sources of assistance
relating the probable costs and benefits; or, providing advice
based on a recognized expertise within a specialized subject
area, on requirements and
selection of outside assistance.
|
Approving or recommending
the expenditure of funds
for outside assistance;
or, providing authoritative advice on requirements
and outside assistance for major
commitments.
|
Characteristic E: Responsibility
|
for the administrative control
|
of work.
|
|
|
Complying with
procedures, directives
and guidelines established for the work,
|
Ensuring that quality,
quantity, safety and other
standards for own responsibility are maintained,
|
Implementing quality
assurance, performance
measurement and safety
procedures to meet unit's
objectives.
|
Controlling and coordinating project schedules and
establishing and implementing performance and safety
standards
and controls to meet
priorities and objectives.
|
Preparing budgets and work
plans, planning and implementing safety. quality
and cost controls, and
recommending objectives
and priorities for a
significant program
activity.
|
Characteristic F: Responsibility
|
for the co-ordination of work
|
performed for, or in conjunction
|
with other organizational
|
units.
|
Limited requirement for coordination of activities with those
of others.
|
Occasionally coordinating
related activities with
those of others.
|
Coordinating related
activities with those of
others.
|
Coordinating differing
activities with those of
one or more organizational
units.
|
Coordinating activities
with several other
organizational units with
differing interests or
conflicting priorities.
|
Characteristic G: Responsibility
|
for implementing or developing
|
administrative procedures,
|
safety and management directives
|
and guidelines.
|
Following straightforward
office or field adminis-
trative procedures,
|
Implementing office or
field administrative
procedures.
|
Interpreting and
implementing guidelines
and directives,
|
Recommending and
developing internal
administrative, safety and
managementt directives and
guidelines,
|
Approving internal
administrative, safety and
management directives and
guidelines, and ensuring
correct and consistent
application of department
and central agency policy,
directives and guidelines.
|
FACTOR: "IMPACT OF
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTIVITIES"
This factor is used to measure the nature and the extent of
the impact directly attributable to the recommendations and
activities of the position, given its particular purpose or
mission, on governmental work or programs; on industrial or
commercial operations, natural resources or the environment,
public health and safety, and other external areas directly
affected by the position; and, on the development and
understanding of a body of knowledge in a subject area.
Notes to Raters
i) When evaluating a position under this factor,
raters are to consider the factor characteristics and the extent
of the impact ranging from degree 1 to degree 5, and attribute to
the position, for each applicable characteristic, the degree
whose definition best reflects or corresponds to the extent of
the most likely impact of the position.
ii) For a same degree of impact, all of the
characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
iii) The degree to be assigned to the position for
the whole factor is determined by the degree which predominates
(i.e. the degree that has been assigned for at least two of the
three characteristics - "A"; the one "B" characteristics: i, ii,
iii, or iv identified as the most pertinent to the purpose or
mission of the position; and, "C"). When one degree does not
predominate, raters are to compare the overall extent of the
impact of the position under the factor with that of the
bench-mark positions, and determine and attribute to the position
the degree which best equate to the bench-mark positions.
(Impact -
Governmental)
DEGREE 1
|
DEGREE 2
|
DEGREE 3
|
DEGREE 4
|
DEGREE 5
|
Characteristic A:
|
|
|
|
|
The impact of recommendations
policies.
|
and activities on departmental
|
work or other government programs
|
in terms of changes to on-going
|
activities, programs or
|
Information and results of
the work have limited
effects on a continuing
operation, project or
study in own area of work.
|
Information and results of
the work affect a
continuing operation,
projects or studies in own
or closely related areas
of work.
|
Recommendations, advice
and results of the work
affect a continuing operation, the formulation of guidelines,
regulations, specifications or standards, and the development
or conduct of projects or
studies in own and related
areas of work.
|
Recommendations, advice or
consultations contribute to the development of policies and
affect the development, conduct or modification of a significant
program activity; or decisions affect the implementation of
projects, studies, guidelines and directives.
|
Authoritative recommendations, advice or consultations affect
the development of departmental policies and programs;
decisions and activities affect the program(s) or activities of
other government organizations; or decisions and
recommendations affect the development, initiation,
conduct or continuation of a
significant program activity.
|
(Impact - External)
|
|
|
|
|
Characteristics B:
|
|
|
|
|
(i)The impact of recommendations
regulatory effect.
|
and activities on an
|
industrial or commercial process,
|
operation or product in terms
|
of the contributory or
|
Information and results of
the work have limited
effects on an industrial
or commercial product,
process or operation.
|
Information and results of
the work have economic or
technological effects on
an industrial or commercial product, process or
operation.
|
Recommendations, advice
and results of the work
have economic or techno-
logical effects on related
industrial or commercial
products, processes or
operations.
|
Recommendations, advice,
consultations or decisions
have economic or technological effects on an
industry or a broad range
of products, processes or
operations.
|
Authoritative recommendations, advice, consultations or
decisions have a substantial effect on the development,
initiation, modification or
continuation of industrial
or commercial enterprises.
|
(ii)The impact of recommendations
environment.
|
and activities in terms
|
of the contribution to or control
|
of the state of natural
|
resources or the
|
Information and results of
the work have limited
effects on the state of a
natural resource or the
environment.
|
Information and results of
the work contribute to improvements for developing,
protecting, conserving or using
natural resources or the
environment.
|
Recommendations, advice
and results of the work
affect the state of
natural resources and,
natural resource and
environmental management
practices.
|
Recommendations, advice or
consultations contribute
to the development of
environmental and natural
resource policies; or
decisions and recommendations affect the state of the
environment or the conservation and use of
natural resources within
established policies.
|
Authoritative
recommendations, advice or
consultations have a
substantial effect on the
development of policies
relating to natural
resources or the environment; or decisions and
recommendations substantially affect natural resources or
the
environment.
|
(iii)The impact of recommendations
safety hazards.
|
and activities in terms
|
of the contribution to public
|
health and the reduction or
|
the control of health and
|
Information and results of
the work have limited
effects on public health
or safety.
|
Information and results of
the work contribute to
determining the efficacy
and safety of the processing or use of foods, drugs
or medical and radiation
emitting devices or to the
regulatory control of
potentially hazardous
products or substances.
|
Recommendations, advice and results of the work affect the
approval and use of foods, drugs, or medical and radiation
emitting or other devices with respect to efficacy and safety,
or the regulatory control of potentially hazardous products
or substances.
|
Recommendations, advice or
consultations contribute
to the development of
policies; or decisions and
recommendations affect the
approval and use of foods,
drugs or medical and
radiation emitting or
other devices or other
potentially hazardous
products or substances
with respect to efficacy
or safety.
|
Authoritative recommendations, advice or consultations have
a
substantial effect on the
development of public health and safety policies; or decisions
and recommendations substantially affect the controlof
potential hazards to
public health or safety.
|
FACTOR: IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATIONS
|
AND ACTIVITIES (CONT'D)
|
|
|
|
DEGREE 1
|
DEGREE 2
|
DEGREE 3
|
DEGREE 4
|
DEGREE 5
|
Characteristics B: (Cont'd)
|
|
|
|
|
(iv)The impact of recommendations
areas directly affected
|
and activities in terms by the position, given its
|
of the contributory or regulatory
particular purpose or mission.
|
effect on other specifically
|
identified external
|
Information and results of the work have limited effects on
the specifically identified area
directly affected by the
position.
|
Information and results of the work have contributory effects
on the specifically identified area directly affected by the
position.
|
Recommendations, advice
and results of the work
have direct effects on the
specifically identified
area directly affected by
the position.
|
Recommendations, advice or
consultations contribute
to the development of
policies; or decisions and
recommendations have wide
ranging effects on the
specifically identified
area directly affected by
the position.
|
Authoritative
recommendations, advice or
consultations have a
substantial effect on the
development of policies;
or decisions and recommendations have substantial effects
on the specifically identified area directly affected by the
position.
|
Characteristic C:
|
|
|
|
|
The impact of recommendations
|
and activities in terms of the
|
contribution to the development
|
and understanding of a body of
|
knowledge.
|
Information and results of
the work contribute to
knowledge in own area of
work.
|
Information and results of
the work contribute to
improvements in methods
and procedures in own area
of work.
|
Development of new methods
and procedures and the
investigation, analysis
and interpretation of
scientific information
provide knowledge and
improved understanding in
own subject area.
|
Development of new concepts and approaches; or, decisions or
recommendations contribute to
knowledge and improved
understanding in a specialized subject area.
|
Decisions and
recommendations affect the
initiation, continuation
or orientation of studies
or projects for the
development of concepts,
methods, approaches and
procedures to acquire new
knowledge in one or more
specialized subject areas.
|
POSITION LEVELS: TYPICAL DISTINGUISHING
FEATURES
±A GUIDE FOR OVERALL CONSISTENCY+
Intent: This Guide broadly aims at providing a
consistent approach to a global perception or an orientation for
a determination of the approximate classification level of a
position, using a series of discernible main features
characterizing positions identified as typical of each level.
Provision: i) Notwithstanding the above, the Guide is
not intended nor shall be used as a substitute for the formal
position classification process and the detailed analysis and
rating of each position, as required in accordance with the
provisions of the rating plan of the Classification Standard.
ii) The series of distinguishing features shown for the
levels, characterizes, as a whole, universes of positions
considered typical of each level. - The series of features for a
level shall not be construed as all inclusive nor as relevant in
its entirety, to all positions at that level.
Advantages: The use of the Guide can be of assistance in
narrowing, at the outset, the range of possible levels indicated
for a position and thus, contributes to a less erratic approach
to the discussions for its subsequent detailed analysis and
rating. Further, the distinguishing features shown for the
various levels in the Guide, and which have been found typical of
positions at those levels, provide a broad reference framework
which can be of value and, contributes in achieving greater
overall consistency in the classification of the positions at the
various levels for the Group.
LEVEL 1
(Positions at Recruiting/Familiarizing
Developing Level as well as Positions
conducting Work of Relatively Low
Complexity)
- Repetitive, Standardized work of
relatively low Complexity
- Work subjected to Detailed Review
- Limited scope for Independent Actions
- Carry out Scientific procedures under
supervision
- Indicate required Support Work to
non-subordinate support staff
LEVEL 2
(Positions Conducting Basic Professional
Work of Moderate Complexity/Diversity)
- Moderate Complexity/Diversity
- Scope for Independent Actions
- May Instruct Junior Scientists and
Supervise Support Staff
- Work Reviewed at Critical
Stages/Phases
|
LEVEL 3
(Positions with Significant
Specialization, Diversity/Complexity or
with Significant Supervisory
Responsibility)
- Expertise in a specialized Subject
Area
- First Level of Scientific Advisory
Responsibility
- Liaison Work Responsibility
- Diversity/Complexity
- Provide Scientific Project Leadership
- Development of New Methods
- Validations of: Procedures
Techniques
Methods
Facilities
- First Supervisory Level:
- Activities of a Unit
- Lead a Group
- Lead a Project Team
|
LEVEL 4
(Positions requiring a High Level of
Scientific Expertise or Position comprising
the First Level of Science Based Management
Responsibility)
- High Level of Expertise in a specialized
subject area
- Second Level of Scientific Advisory
Responsibility
- Recognized Authority in a Subject
- Scientific Co-ordination Responsibility
- First level of Management Responsibility
- Project Objective Responsibility
- Second Level Supervision
LEVEL 5
(Positions at the Highest Level of
Scientific
Management within the Group or Positions
requiring the Highest level of Scientific
Expertise within the Group)
- Highest Level of Expertise in a
Specialized
Subject Area
- A Senior Departmental Scientific Advisor
- High Level Co-ordination/Liaison
- Broad scope for Independent Actions
within
Policy and Resources Framework
- Significant input in Policy Development
- Management of a Science Based Significant
Program Activity, a Significant Work Group
or Large Complex Project
|
LIST OF BENCH-MARK
POSITIONS
#
|
TITLE
|
LEVEL
|
1
|
Physical Scientist - Precambrian Geology
(Support Geologists Sect.) (EMR)
|
1
|
2
|
Climatological Analyst (EC)
|
1
|
3
|
Satellite Data Analyst (EC)
|
1
|
4
|
Area Soil Conservationist - (AGR - PFRA)
|
2
|
5
|
Environmental Assessment Officer (NEB)
|
2
|
6
|
Energy and Mineral Commodities Research Officer (EMR)
|
2
|
7
|
Physical Climatologist (EC)
|
2
|
8
|
Aquatic Scientist - Monitoring and Field Studies (EC)
|
2
|
9
|
Field Experiment Support Scientist (EC)
|
2
|
10
|
Scientific Evaluator - Medical Devices (HWC)
|
3
|
11
|
Standard Development Officer - Medical Devices (HWC)
|
3
|
12
|
Senior Isotopic Analyst - Mass Spectrometry
|
3
|
|
(Geochronology) (EMR)
|
|
13
|
Physical Oceanographer (F&0)
|
3
|
14
|
Explosives Scientist (EMR)
|
3
|
15
|
Senior Physical Scientist and Risk Analyst (EC)
|
3
|
16
|
Senior Officer/Advisor - Physical Oceanography (F&O)
|
4
|
17
|
Superintendent, Climate Assessment and Impact Section (EC)
(Applied Climatology Research and Development)
|
4
|
18
|
Resource Engineering (Marine) Geophysicist (EMR)
|
4
|
19
|
Senior Advisor - Metallurgical Technology (EMR)
|
5
|
20
|
Chief, Scientific Information (F&O)
|
5
|
21
|
Senior Science Advisor - Renewables and
|
5
|
|
New Liquid Fuels (EMR)
|
|
RATING SUMMARY - BENCH-MARK
POSITIONS
B.M.
NO.
|
TITLE
|
LVL
|
FACTOR: 1
KIND OF ASSIGNMENT
CHARACTERISTIC/DEGREE
|
FACTOR: 2
COMPLEXITY OF WORK
CHARACTERISTIC/DEGREE
|
FACTOR: 3
PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
CHARACTERISTIC/DEGREE
|
FACTOR: 4
MNGM''NT RESPONSIBILITY
CHARACTERISTIC/DEGREE
|
FACTOR: 5
IMPACT OF RECOMM. & ACTVTIES
CHARACTERISTIC/DEGREE
)
|
|
|
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D FACT
|
A
|
B C
|
D E
|
F
|
C H
|
FACT
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
F FACT
|
A
|
B
|
C D
|
E F
|
G FACT
|
A
|
(i)
|
B
(ii)
|
(iii)
|
(iv)
|
= B
|
C
|
FACT
|
1.
|
Physical Scientist
(Support Geologists Sect.) (EMR)
|
1 1
|
1
|
1
|
1 1
|
2
|
1 1
|
1 1
|
1
|
1 1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1 1
|
1
|
1
|
1 1
|
1 1
|
1 1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
7
|
1
|
2.
|
Climatological Analyst (EC)
|
1 1
|
1
|
1
|
1 1
|
1
|
1 1
|
1 2
|
2
|
1 1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|
1
|
1
|
1 1
|
1 1
|
1 1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3.
|
Satellite Data Analyst
(EC)
|
1 2
|
|
1
|
2 2
|
2
|
2 2
|
2 1
|
1
|
2 2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1 1
|
1
|
1
|
1 1
|
1 1
|
1 1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
7
|
1
|
1
|
4.
|
Area Soil Conservationist
(AGR - PFRA)
|
2 2
|
2
|
2
|
2 2
|
2
|
2 2
|
3 3
|
3
|
2 2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
I
3 2
|
2
|
2
|
2 2
|
1 3
|
2 2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
5.
|
Environmental Assessment Officer
(NEB)
|
2 2
|
2
|
2
|
2 2
|
2
|
2 2
|
2 3
|
3
|
2 2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
3 3
|
1
|
1
|
1 2
|
2 3
|
2 2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
-
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
6.
|
Energy and Mineral Commodities
Research Officer (EMR)
|
2 2
|
2
|
2
|
2 2
|
2
|
2 2
|
2 2
|
2
|
3 2
|
2,
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2 2
|
2
|
2
|
2 2
|
2 3
|
2 2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
|
-
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
7.
|
Physical Climatologist (EC)
|
2 3
|
2
|
2
|
2 2
|
3
|
2 3
|
3 2
|
2
|
1 2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2 2
|
2
|
2
|
2 3
|
2 2
|
2'1 2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
8.
|
Aquatic Scientist - Monitoring
and Field Studies (EC)
|
2 2
|
2
|
2
|
2 2
|
2
|
2 3
|
3 2
|
3
|
2 2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
3 3
|
2
|
2
|
2 3
|
2 3
|
2 2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
-
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
9.
|
Field Experiment Support
Scientist (EC)
|
2 2
|
2
|
2
|
2 2
|
3
|
3 3
|
3 2
|
2
|
3 2
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
3 3
|
2
|
2
|
2 2
|
2 2
|
21 2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
10.
|
Scientific Evaluator - medical
Devices (HWC)
|
3 3
|
3
|
3
|
3 3
|
4
|
3 4
|
4 3
|
3
|
3 4
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3 3
|
1
|
1
|
1 1
|
1 3
|
1 1
|
3
|
3
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
11.
|
Standard Development Officer -
Medical Devices (HWC)
|
3 3
|
3
|
3
|
3 3
|
3
|
3 4
|
4 3
|
3
|
4 4
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
4 3
I
|
1
|
1
|
1 3
|
1 3
|
1 1
|
3
|
3
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
12.
|
Senior Isotopic Analyst
Mass Spect. (Geochronology) (EMR)
|
3 3
|
3
|
3
|
3 3
|
3
|
3 3
|
3 3
|
2
|
4 3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3 3
|
2
|
3
|
3 2
|
3 3
|
2 3
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
13.
|
Physical Oceanographer (F&0)
|
3 3
|
3
|
3
|
4 3
|
3
|
3 4
|
3 3
|
3
|
3 3
|
13
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3 3
|
2
|
3
|
3 3
|
3 3
|
3 3
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
14.
|
Explosives Scientist (EMR)
|
3 3
|
3
|
2
|
3 3
|
3
|
3 3
|
3 3
|
3
|
3 3
|
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
4 3
|
2
|
3
|
3 3
|
3 3
|
3 3
|
3
|
3
|
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
15.
|
Senior Physical Scientist and
Risk Analyst (EC)
|
3 3
|
4
|
3
|
3 3
|
3
|
3 3
|
4 4
|
4
|
3 4
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
4 4
|
1
|
1
|
3 3
|
2 3
|
1 2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
-
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
16.
|
Senior Officer/Advisor -
Physical Oceanography (F&0)
I
|
4 4
|
4
|
4
|
4 4
|
4
|
4 4
|
4 4
|
4
|
4 4
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
5 5
|
|
1
|
3 4
|
3 4
|
2 3
|
5
|
4
|
|
-
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
|
17.
|
Superintendent - Climate Assessmen
and Impact Section (EC)
|
4 4
|
4
|
4
|
4 4
|
3
|
4 4
|
4 4
|
4
|
4 4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
|
4
|
4
|
4 4
|
4 4
|
3 4
|
4
|
4
|
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
4
|
|
18.
|
Resource Engineering (Marine)
Geophysicist (EMR)
|
4 4
|
4
|
4
|
4 4
|
4
|
4 4
|
4 4
|
4
|
4 4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
5 4
|
3
|
4
|
4 4
|
4 4
|
3 4
|
4
|
4
|
|
-
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
|
19.
|
Senior Advisor - Metallurgical
Technology (EMR)
|
5 5
|
5
|
5
|
5 5
|
5
|
5 5
|
5 5
|
4
|
5 5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5 5
|
|
1
|
4 5
|
4 5
|
1 4
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
-
|
-
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
20.
|
Chief, Scientific Information
(F&0)
|
5 5
|
5
|
5
|
5 5
|
5
|
5 5
|
5 5
|
5
|
4 5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5 5
|
3
|
4
|
5 5
|
5 5
|
4 5
|
5
|
5
|
|
-
|
-
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
21.
|
Senior Science Advisor (EMR)
|
5 5
|
5
|
5
|
5 5
|
5
|
5 5
|
5 5
|
5
|
5 5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5 5
|
3
|
1
|
4 4
|
4 5
|
4 4
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
2
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
(3)
|
|
(4)
|
|
(5)
|
|
Key in order of appearance of
letters under the factors.
|
A =
|
Objectives
estbls by othrs
|
A =
|
Info./Data - Avlblty/
Problems
|
A =
|
Extent wrk check'd by
others
|
A =
|
Resp.: Control of
Staff
|
IMPACT
|
(Governmental)
|
|
|
B =
|
Extent of work
|
B =
|
Info./Data - Validity
|
B =
|
Profsn'1 guidance recv'd
|
B =
|
Resp.: Control of
|
A =
|
on Dept'l wrk/Other Gov.
|
|
|
C =
|
Variety of
activities
|
C =
|
Into./Data - N/Varblty/
Ambg'ty of
|
C =
|
Init./Judg'mt in
Def'ng objectives
|
|
physical
resources
|
|
progrms
|
|
|
D =
|
Scope for plan'g
& condct'ng wrk
|
D =
|
variables
Info./Data - Relnshps of
variables
|
|
Dealing w problems
Estblsh'ng
guidelines
|
C =
D =
|
Rasp.: Conmt'ng
resources
Resp.: Obt'ng outside
|
IMPACT
B =
|
(External)
i) = on Ind'l/Commrc'1 prod/
|
|
|
|
|
E =
|
Effect of actvty of
others on wrk
|
D =
|
Judgm'nt in assess'ng
work of others
|
E =
|
asstnce
Resp.: Admin. contrl
|
|
oper.
if) = on Natrl. res./Envrnmnt
|
|
|
|
|
F =
|
Contacts - Nature/
Purpose
|
E =
|
Judgm'nt in intrprt'ng
results
|
F =
|
of wrk
Resp.: Co-ord'n of
|
|
iii) = on Public health/safety
iv) = on Other external areas
|
|
|
|
|
G =
|
Regrm'nt for: Devipm'nt,
adpt'n, applct'n,
apprchs, procdrs and
techniques
|
F =
|
Judgm'nt in providing
advice
|
|
wrk perf.
for/with othr
orgnztn'1
units
|
C =
|
Impact on body of knowledge
|
|
|
|
|
H -
|
Knowledge
|
|
|
G =
|
Resp.: Implemnt'ng or
Devlp'ng
guidelines
|
|
|
|
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 1
|
Level: 1
|
Descriptive-Title: Physical Scientist (Support Geologists
Section) Precambrian Geology
|
|
Reporting to the Assistant to the Director of the Lithosphere
and Canadian Shield Division:
|
|
Accumulates geological data by planning and performing field
work involving the use of helicopters, airplanes, boats etc., and
laboratory investigations. Compiles data from other sources to
assist in the production of geological maps and the design
of new geological exploration projects. Other sources of
information include original field notes, existing stored data,
air photos, and other reports and maps.
Using Scientific Laboratory equipment, such as petrographic
microscopes, studies the physical, structural and minerological
properties of rocks. Evaluates data and prepares it for computer
processing; including writing simple data retrieval programs.
Studies and evaluates air photos, aeromagnetic and other
geophysical maps, remote sensing information and other computer
programs to assist the research scientists.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - Work objectives are provided and the work is
performed with the
instructions and priorities set by the supervising scientists
for each project.
B. Degree 1 - The work normally consists of providing data
for parts of projects or
assisting a more senior person in a part of a project aimed at
producing geological
maps. Occasionally may be assigned to part of a sub-project
for independent
research.
C. Degree 1 - The work is limited to obtaining
information on rock samples using
standard methods; entry and manipulation of the data obtained
in a computer, and
modification of simple computer programs.
D. Degree 1 - Plans daily work according to established
procedures using standard
methods for implementation. Field and laboratory work
is planned with the
supervising scientist, and laboratory methods are selected
from known acceptable
methods.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
1
|
A. Degree 2 - Participates in field and laboratory work
where data are obtained by
direct observation. Other required data are available from
recognized sources such
as notes taken by field officers, from library research, and
analytical results.
B. Degree 1 - Data are normally accepted as valid. Any
questionable data are evaluated
by a supervising scientist.
C. Degree 1 - The geological information, as received,
is discrete and unambiguous.
D. Degree 1 - Data relationships are simple and for the most
part known and understood.
E. Degree 1 - Changing objectives, priorities, projects and
personnel have a limited
impact on the daily work.
F. Degree 1 - Contacts are with scientists of the immediate
working group of field and
laboratory geologist to obtain information used in preparing
geological maps, project
plans and for input to the computer.
G. Degree 1 - The work generally involves using standard
techniques to determine the
minerological properties of rocks; simple computer programs
have to be written from
time to time.
|
|
|
Degree
|
H. Degree 1 - A sound knowledge of geology with
supplementary knowledge and familiarity
with laboratory and field techniques, and the use of computers
in data manipulation
and map production is required.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - Work is generally reviewed by supervisor or
other senior scientists,
however, the data are expected to be verified and transcribed
accurately and
completely.
B. Degree 1 - Professional guidance from senior scientists
is available for the
interpretation and compilation of geological field notes.
C. Degree 1 - Suggestions for additional sources of data,
new and improved techniques
and indication of potential problems are expected.
D. Degree 1 - Procedures used by laboratory and field staff
in developing the data, and
data processing methods followed by the computer staff are
checked for correctness.
E. Degree 1 - Own observations and work are reviewed for
reliability and consistency and
reported to the senior scientists.
F. Degree 1 - Instructions may be given to non-subordinate
support staff and information
may be obtained for research scientists to assist them in
attaining the objectives
of their projects.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - The work requires occasionally giving
instructions about the preparation
of maps, charts and figures to non-subordinate
technicians.
B. Degree 1 - Responsible for the daily use planning and
control of those resources
used for own work.
C. Degree 1 - Limited to the spending of own time and the
use of equipment and supplies
for own work.
D. Degree 1 - Informs supervisor on the need for outside
assistance for field and
laboratory projects.
E. Degree 1 - Complies with administrative procedures,
directives, guidelines and
quality assurance standards established for the work.
F. Degree 1 - Limited to fitting own work into that of
others in the same unit.
C. Degree 1 - Follows established straightforward office,
laboratory and field
procedures.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - Information and results of the work
contribute to the on-going project of
the supervising research scientist and can have an effect on
the project work. Work
is carried out in close liaison with the supervising
scientist. Impact on
departmental activities attributable to the work of the
position, would be indirect
or limited.
B. Degree 1 -
(i) Degree 1 - The work of providing up-to-date maps of
geological formations can
have a limited effect on the exploration (mining)
industry.
(ii) Degree 1 - The work has limited indirect effects on the
status of a natural
resource, by contributing to the promotion of the exploration
for, and hence
the ultimate exploitation of mineral resources.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 1 - The data generated and analyzed will add to
the knowledge of Canadian
geology by providing new, informative maps.
|
|
1.3 LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director, Lithosphere and Canadian Shield Division Assistant
to the Director
- Pretrology Section
- Geochronology Section
- Technical Services (DD and CL)
- Support Geologists Section (PC-2)
* - Physical Scientist (Support Geologist) -
Precambriam Geology (PC-1) - Support Geologists (PC-1)
* Bench-mark position
2.1 BENCH-MARK POSITION
DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 2
|
Level: 1
|
Descriptive Title: Climatological Analyst
|
|
Reporting to the Head, Climate Technique Development and
Transfer:
|
|
Participates in the preparation of climatic
maps, atlases and other publications using data obtained from the
National Climatological Archives. Collects, collates, evaluates
and interprets climatological data from various other sources
such as base maps, land use maps, topographical charts and
bathymetric maps, to be used in the preparation of information
concerning Canada's climate. Arranges task schedules with the
cartographic units and printing shops and ensures that the final
product meets the department's objectives for quality.
Provides a response service to enquiries about
Canadian climatological data and maps to outside users and staff
of other organizational units and ensures that quality and
technical objectives are met.
Proposes areas for new climate studies where
needs are indicated. Analyses, re-evaluates and reformats
existing data to better serve the needs of the users. Reviews
climatological publications for use in meeting the needs of the
users and the objectives of the department, assesses need for and
value of new serials, and recommends changes to enhance the
effectiveness of the services.
Writes reports; follows safety and
administrative practices; occasionally instructs non-subordinate
support staff; arranges for translations; writes computer
programs, and performs other related work as required.
Specifications
|
Degree
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - Work objectives are stated and instructions
are given by the supervisor
with direction as required from the Heads of the Climate
Information Service and
Publication Units.
B. Degree 1 - Work consists of preparing maps as part of
Atlas projects, responding to
requests for climatological information, and manipulating and
evaluating
climatological data.
C. Degree 1 - Activities are closely related and involve the
manipulation and
assessment of climatological data for information used in
preparing maps and
responding to requests.
D. Degree 1 - Own work is planned according to established
procedures and precedents
for the preparation and printing of climatological data. Some
negotiation with
staff of cartography and printing units is required for task
scheduling to meet
deadlines.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - Data are obtained from existing archives in a
straight-forward fashion.
B. Degree 1 - Data are of known quality, as validity is
established prior to archiving.
C. Degree 1 - Data are usually unambiguous and of known
variability and implications.
D. Degree 1 - Relationships between climatological variables
are known and can be
handled using routine techniques.
|
|
|
Degree
|
E. Degree 2 - The flow of outside user requests and
activities of other climatologists
working within the group can effect own work scheduling.
F. Degree 2 - Provides climatological information to outside
users. Contacts are also
with staff of other organizational units to obtain information
and discuss work
problems. May brief media representatives on important climate
happenings.
G. Degree 1 - The work involves applying standard
statistical computing and analytical
procedures used in climatology. There is an occasional need to
adapt or propose
improved methods.
H. Degree 1 - A sound knowledge of physical geography,
involving climatology, and a
knowledge of cartography practices and Canada's climatic
conditions, and a
familiarity with the particular computer application software
used to access the
digital archives are required.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
1
|
A. Degree 2 - Work assignments are reviewed by supervisor
for completeness and quality
on completion or at critical points. The data produced are
expected to be
technically correct.
B. Degree 1 - Professional guidance is available on use of
methods, precedents and data
interpretations. Direction is received from supervisor on
problem solution.
C. Degree 1 - The work requires selecting the appropriate
approaches for developing
climatic maps and data according to established procedures;
indicating problems and
proposing modifications where required.
D. Degree 1 - Work performed by non-subordinate support
staff and students is checked
for the correct selection and application of methods. Checks
finished maps for
legibility and accuracy and for compatibility with
standards.
E. Degree 2 - The work involves interpreting data output
from digital archives so that
the results are meaningful to users.
F. Degree 1 - Guidance and explanations concerning data are
given to support staff, and
climatological event data and their interpretation are
explained to colleagues in
other groups.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - The work requires assigning tasks to summer
students and to other
non-subordinate support staff as required.
B. Degree 1 - Must plan the use of equipment and supplies for
own work.
C. Degree 1 - Allocates own time and the use of material
supplies needed for own work.
D. Degree 1 - Informs the supervisor of the need for outside
assistance.
E. Degree 1 - Complies with procedures, guidelines and
directives established for the
work.
F. Degree 1 - Generally, there is a limited requirement for
coordination w'th
activities of others. Liaison with other groups is required
for preparation and
publication of climate data circulars and climate normals
booklets.
G. Degree 1 - Follows straightforward established
administrative and safety procedures.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
1
|
A. Degree 2 - information and results of the work can have
an impact on the credibility
of the Climate Services, limited effects on the operation of
the climatology section
of Environment Canada and some effect on aspects of the
Developmental Climatology
and Customer Computing Services Sections.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 1 -
|
|
(i) Degree 1 - Results of work can have limited
effects on certain activities or
operations of industrial or commercial users of
climate data and information.
(ii) Degree 1 - The work does not normally
impact on the state of the environment
but can indirectly contribute to protecting or improving the
environment
through a better understanding of climatic conditions.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 1 - The results contribute to and enhance current
understanding of the
climatology of Canada.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
- Chief Climate Services
- Superintendent, Climate Information and Publication
Section
- Head, Publication and Micrographic Unit
- Head, Information Service Unit
- Superintendent, Marketing and Computer Information
- Superintendent of Development - Climatology Section
Head, Climate Techniques Development and Transfer
* - Climatological Analyst PC-1
- Climatological Analyst PC-1
- Data Analysis Clerk
- Summer Student(s)
* Bench-mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 3
|
Level: 1
|
Descriptive Title: Satellite Data Analyst
|
|
Reporting to a Research Scientist, Remote Sensing Section
Aerospace Meteorology Division:
|
|
Processes, reduces, analyses, assesses and integrates into
regional wave amplitude and direction forecasting models, the
atmospheric, surface land and marine scientific measurement data
from remote satellite and balloon platform sensing
instrumentation and remote sensing recording ground stations.
Performs evaluation studies on the use of
satellite data, adapts or develops and tests new techniques and
forecasting models pertaining to the distribution, temporal and
spatial variability of ocean and atmosphere for the particular
region.
Formulates and tests computer algorithms to
investigate and process data in developing calibrations and
forecasting models and making required modifications.
Utilizes computer graphics, micro-computer,
micro-processor system and scientific application software.
Evaluates the performance, and contributes to the development and
enhancement of computer application software for the work and to
the identification of new applications of satellite data,
attending meetings, reading and researching scientific literature
and publications. Writes reports and papers on study work and
explains results and particular interpretations of the data.
Prepares papers and seminars to disseminate the information
obtained.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - The objectives of the work are clearly defined
by the Supervising
Research Scientist in terms of the specific contribution of
the work to achieving
the aims of the scientific research unit.
B. Degree 1 - The work normally consists of part of a
scientific project on
stratospheric research or part of a continuing operation on
the application of
satellite remote sensing data to develop wave forecasting
models.
C. Degree 1 - While remote sensing data represents a wide
variety of data types, the
manipulation of this data can be performed by relatively
straight-forward successive
operations and using a limited number of numerical analysis
techniques to analyze
and develop models and test techniques.
D. Degree 2 - Must plan tasks, determine and select methods
in conducting work to meet
set objectives. Planning and scheduling of algorithm/model
development is done with
the supervising scientist and techniques are developed.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Data obtained are in a semi-processed form and
must be selected, reduced,
evaluated and compared to other observed data and the results
of mathematical
predictions.
B. Degree 2 - Information data is varied but can normally be
validated by reference to
the literature or by normal correlation procedures.
C. Degree 2 - Remote sensing data gathered in remote sensing
measurement programs to
yield information about the distribution, temporal and spatial
variability of ocean
and atmosphere involves variables and requires interpretation
but the implications
and variability are known.
|
|
|
Degree
|
D. Degree 2 - Relationships between variables can normally be
established and
inconsistencies resolved by straight-forward investigation
using accepted modeling
techniques.
E. Degree 1 - Some rescheduling of work tasks may be
required due to changed data
demand and computer work priorities.
F. Degree 1 - Contacts are normally with the unit's
Supervising Scientist and the
Computer Systems Specialist to discuss information and
requirements. Contacts with
other research personnel in other units to provide information
on results may be
required.
C. Degree 2 - The work usually requires adapting practices,
techniques and procedures
to develop new models and computer algorithms for
remote-sensing data reduction and
wave model formulation.
H. Degree 2 - The work requires the application of a sound
knowledge of the principles
and theories of physical oceanography complemented by
familiarity with numerical
analysis techniques and meteorology practices and some
familiarity with computer
scientific applications programming in the area of wave
forecasting.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - Algorithms/models and particular data
evaluations and interpretations are
reviewed by the Supervising Scientist while in progress and on
completion for
consistency and correctness.
B. Degree 1 - Professional guidance is available from the
Supervising Scientist and the
Computer Systems Specialist for appropriateness and correct
use of methods and
techniques.
C. Degree 1 - The work requires identifying and discussing
problems with existing or
new methods and prototype software to determine approaches.
Selects work methods
and techniques according to established procedures and
precedents.
D. Degree 1 - Requested data processing support work is
reviewed for correctness as
applicable.
E. Degree 2 - Satellite data are analyzed, interpreted and
evaluated to produce
meaningful data using numerical analysis techniques, numerical
filtering and
polynomial regressions.
F. Degree 1 - As necessary, explanations and details
concerning the work are provided
to colleagues for use in their own projects. Instructions are
provided to
non-subordinate support staff as required.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - The work occasionally requires assigning
tasks such as data processing to
non-subordinate support staff.
B. Degree 1 - Plans the use of own equipment and supplies
to process data from remote
sensing programs.
C. Degree 1 - Commits the use of own time, supplies and
equipment to process data and
produce wave forecasting models.
D. Degree 1 - Informs Supervising Scientist whenever there
is a need for external
assistance.
E. Degree 1 - Complies with procedures already established
for the production of
appropriate information on wave forecasting.
F. Degree 1 - Limited requirement for coordination of
activities with those of others
to schedule algorithm/model development and to adapt plans to
account for change in
satellite data demand.
C. Degree 1 - Follows straight-forward administrative
procedures established for the
work.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
1
|
A. Degree 2 - Information generated and forecasting models
produced support ongoing
research projects or a continuing study in the field of wave
forecasting.
B. Degree 1 -
(i) Degree 1 - Regional forecasting models of wave amplitude
and direction and
results of evaluation studies on the use of satellite data
contribute to
research projects for improved forecasting, and as research
support, can have
indirect economic effects on the operations and commercial
activities of
ocean-going vessels.
(ii) Degree 1 - Results of the work support research projects
or study and can have
some indirect or limited effects on the environment or state
of natural resource.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) Degree 1 - Results of the work contribute to research
projects for improved
forecasting and, as research support, can have indirect
effects on the safety
of marine users.
C. Degree 1 - Results of the work contribute additional
knowledge in the area of
meteorological forecasting and more particularly the
forecasting of wave amplitude
and direction using satellite data.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Chief, Aerospace Meteorology
- Head, Wind Engineering Section
- Head, Satellite Data Lab
- Supervisor, Satellite Data Systems
- Head, Meteorological Satellite
Section
Research Scientist, Remote Sensing
* - Satellite Data Analyst PC-1
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 4
|
Level: 2
|
Descriptive Title: Area Soil Conservationist (Manitoba)
(Soil and Water Conservation Service - PFRA)
|
|
Reporting to the Area Manager, Field Operations Division
|
|
Plans investigations to determine the extent
and severity of soil degradation and soil and water conservation
problems, obtaining and analyzing current information,
identifying and prioritizing problems through discussions with
farmers, representatives of associations, contacts and visits at
research establishments or agencies and conservation districts,
and study of literature.
Determines soil parameters to be studied and
arranges and conducts field surveys, selecting site, installing
monitoring instruments, collecting, analyzing and evaluating data
and identifying factors/effects and their relationships (e.g.
snow melt, precipitation, slope, cropping practices and
management, farming systems, groundwater movement, soil
salinization, acidification, solotnetzic soil formation, erosion,
loss of organic matter and decline in fertility) and generates
field maps.
Determines soil and water conservation problems and develops
management practices and plans on a watershed/conservation
district and individual farm site basis.
Discusses results of studies and investigations
with Soil Conservation Planning Unit, develops soil remedial
practices in consultation with local agricultural extension
representatives and the Planning Unit. Prepares reports and make
recommendations on soil management proposals for approval and
implementation.
Provides advice and assists in the
implementation of conservation practices; assists
watershed/conservation districts and the farmers in matters of
financial assistance available with the Branch's policies;
monitors conservation projects to assess effectiveness; and,
report on findings.
Creates a public awareness and publicizes soil
conservation issues, reclamation practices and implications of
continued soil degradation. Arranges for demonstrations of soil
and water conservation practices to farmers in the area, locating
sites and cooperators, installing monitoring devices and
collecting and recording the data, planning public field days at
demonstration sites, and reports on observations and data
collected to the Planning Unit for analysis.
Coordinates at field level, multi-agencies study projects in
conservation conducted by the Soil Conservation Planning
Unit.
Directs and supervises technical and support staff and reports
on activities.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Objectives are set by the Area Manager within
established programs for
soil and water conservation and financial assistance.
Priorities are established by
local watershed/conservation districts, consultations and the
Soil Conservation
Planning Unit.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 2 - The work normally consists of a number of
discrete investigations of soil
degradation and soil and water conservation management
practices, to determine
problems and remedial practices.
C. Degree 2 - Activities include a variety of tasks allied
to the surveying,
investigating, evaluating, monitoring and reporting on soil
degradation and
conservation issues; allocating work and providing advice.
D. Degree 2 - Surveys and investigations are planned,
approached determined, methods
selected and reports prepared to meet established
objectives.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Information in terms of soil and water
conservation methods and
techniques is usually readily available. Information and data
on soil degradation
are obtained by investigations, field surveys or studies,
direct observations and
using monitoring devices, air photos, remote sensing
techniques and
agrometeorological networks.
B. Degree 2 - Information and data on soil degradation,
farming practices, land use and
soil and water conservation practices and issues can normally
be validated by
investigative methods, previous or repeated observations and
referencing.
C. Degree 2 - Soil and water conservation and soil
degradation data are characterized
by several variables which require interpretation but of known
implications and
variability.
D. Degree 3 - Relationships between factors affecting
conservation and degradation
processes and other observed variables or those established
for other geographical
regions can be conflicting, requiring interpretation and
investigation to resolve
site-specific inconsistencies.
E. Degree 3 - Work is frequently affected by the activities
of other scientists within
the organization and the requirements of the Planning Unit,
the watershed/conservation
districts and the individual farmers' practices. Conservation
planning, drainage,
land use changes and other remedial practices are effected by
the activities of
agricultural and production extension personnel, the farmers
and provincial and
municipal representatives or officials.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with farmers, other
scientists/professionals and
representatives of the agriculture industry and agencies of
governments and local
agricultural extension personnel, to cooperatively resolve
problems, explain issues,
assess relevancy of their work to own studies and programs or
provide technical
information and advice.
C. Degree 2 - The work requires using existing conservation
practices and techniques,
making modifications or adaptations as required.
H. Degree 2 - The work requires the application of a sound
knowledge of the principles
and theories of pedology, involving soil capability
classification, soil physical,
chemical and degradation processes, land use and crop
production. Knowledge of
pertinent techniques and practices of hydrogeology, watershed
management, agronomy
and air photo interpretation and a familiarity with remote
sensing techniques and
public relation methods are also necessary.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Investigation plans, work progress, results
and recommendations are
reviewed by the manager and the Soil Conservation Planning
Unit for effectiveness,
consistency with guidelines and programs, and completeness.
Data collected and
interpretation of results are accepted as technically
accurate.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 2 - Professional guidance is received from the
Soil Conservation Planning
Unit and the Service Soil Conservation specialist for new
aspects of the work.
Studies and directives are provided, scientific guidelines are
established and
administrative guidance is available.
C. Degree 2 - Work requires identifying soil conservation
problems, finding suitable
methods to overcome them, and assisting in the implementation
of remedial projects.
D. Degree 2 - Work of subordinates is reviewed for accuracy,
quality and effectiveness.
Reviews literature in the field of soil and water conservation
for applicability.
E. Degree 2 - Results are evaluated and interpreted to
provide recommendations and
advice on conservation problems, and meaningful information
and reports on
conservation practices.
F. Degree 3 - Specific technical advice is given to members
or officials of the
regional agricultural industry, as well as to immediate
superior, colleagues and
senior members of staff on the key soil conservation issues
and on the need and type
of remedial actions required.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Assigns work, trains and supervises
technicians and casual employees.
B. Degree 2 - Ensures proper maintenance and use of the
equipment, supplies and
facilities allocated for the work.
C. Degree 2 - Identifies and estimates need for funds,
equipment, facilities and
services required for projected work, investigations and
remedial action plans.
D. Degree 2 - Recommends on the need for additional
technical assistance to the Area
Manager, for approval.
E. Degree 2 - Ensures that quality, quantity, safety and
other work standards for own
responsibility are maintained.
F. Degree 3 - Work requires, coordinating related
activities with those of other
contributing agencies at federal and provincial levels,
municipal officials or
representatives and production extension personnel involved in
soil conservation,
drainage and land use changes. Coordinates at field level,
multi-agency projects
conducted by the Conservation planning Unit.
G. Degree 2 - Implements administrative procedures
established for the work, attendance
at exhibitions and in the processing of applications for
financial assistance to
watershed/conservation districts and individual farmers for
implementation of
conservation practices.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Results of the work contribute to the
on-going monitoring of Prairie soil
degradation and affect the initiation or continuation of
departmental soil
conservation projects, land use policies of municipal
government and the drainage
and flood control practices within watershed/conservation
districts.
B. Degree 2 -
(i) Degree 2 - Results of the work and recommendations affect
the management and
cropping practices and economic return from the farming
operations of
individual farmers with environmental and economic effects on
the regional
agricultural sector and on the attitude toward conservations
practices.
(ii) Degree 2 - Results of the work contribute to the
conservation and long term
productivity of prairie soil resources.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 2 - Information and results contribute knowledge
pertaining to the Prairie
soil, soil degradation in the area, effectiveness of soil and
water conservation
practices within watershed/conservation districts and
long-term productivity of the
prairie soil.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
- Manager, Field Operations Division (Prairie Region) Area
Manager, Field Operations (Manitoba)
- Assistant Area Manager, Land Use
- Assistant Area Manager, Water Development
- Coordinator, Construction and Services
* - Area Soil Conservationists (3) PC-2
- Technicians (up to 2) (EG),
- Casual employee (1)
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 5
|
Level: 2
|
Descriptive Title: Environmental Assessment Officer
|
|
Reporting to the Chief, Environmental Assessment and
Surveillance Division:
|
|
Assesses geotechnical aspects of applications
for inter-provincial and international oil and gas pipelines and
electric power lines construction: Reviews applicant's
submission, analyses and recommendations for thoroughness and
applicability of environmental information provided. Assess
correctness of the environmental impact statements presented and
identifies deficiencies. Identifies the environmental issues
involved against the National Energy Board's environmental
policies and requirements, assessing the potential impacts of a
physical nature for soil erosion, terrain instability, physical
soil assessment, soil losses as well as various impacts of a
biological nature upon environmental components. Analyses the
mitigative and rehabilitative measures and assesses adequacy of
the physical environmental protection and mitigative measures
against regulatory agency requirements, established
practices,
guidelines and recommendations.
Monitors and audits construction and company
operational activities on pipeline and power line projects and
conducts field studies to ensure conformance with requirements
and approved environmental practices. Brings violations or
omissions to the attention of the company and the appropriate
authorities. Conducts operational audits on pipeline and power
line right-of-ways and incident and spill sites and writes
reports on finding for the Operation Division.
Provides professional advice to staff members,
supervisors and National Energy Board Panel members, on the
geographic, geomorphologic, petrologic and related biological
impacts of the pipeline or power line application. At public
hearings established by the National Energy Board (NEB),
evaluates evidence and arguments and prepares reports for board
members. Prepares responses for the public on the environmental
requirements of the NEB.
Identifies the need for, develops and
recommends guidelines and practices for the mitigation of
unavailable environmental impacts and rehabilitation of disturbed
lands after construction, reviewing terms and conditions to NEB
certificates, orders and licenses, and investigating on site the
effectiveness of the mitigative techniques used, for efficacy of
the terms and conditions in promoting desired activities for
achieving acceptable level of restoration of the right-of-ways to
satisfy the NEB's responsibilities.
Reports to the Chief and the Project Manager on construction
and operational activities, and makes recommendations for
required corrective actions.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Objectives of the work are clearly defined
with the Chief and within
regulations set by the National Energy Board.
B. Degree 2 - Work normally consists of evaluating and
monitoring a number of discrete
applications for pipelines and power lines to assess potential
impact and conformance
to environmental practices.
|
|
|
Degree
|
C. Degree 2 - Activities consist of a number of tasks, such
as evaluating, reviewing,
inspecting and reporting on the potential physical impact of
pipeline and power line
construction projects, bringing up violations, making
recommendation and providing
advice.
D. Degree 2 - Work is planned and approaches determined so
that conditions set at
public hearings and need for appropriate timing and levels of
surveillance to
monitor construction activities are met.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Information is gathered from industry,
interveners and applicant's
submission, available technical reports or by direct
inspection of
pipelines/power line construction conditions and
activities.
B. Degree 2 - Data can normally be validated against
previous experiences, engineering
standards and similar references.
C. Degree 2 - Information is characterized by several
variables such as soil stability,
meteorological conditions and ecological zone characteristics,
with generally known
implications but some of these are poorly defined.
D. Degree 2 - Relationships between the physical nature of
the terrain and the
ecological zone are generally well established.
E. Degree 3 - The work is affected by the operational
activities of contractors,
requirements of interveners, officials from industry, the
provinces and others
outside the organization unit.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with others within the
Environmental Assessment Division,
experts in other government departments and agencies, industry
and other outside
organizations to exchange information, bring up violations,
discuss mitigative and
rehabilitative measures, problems and alternative methods
concerning construction
work.
G. Degree 2 - Work requires adapting existing practices,
techniques and procedures of
environmental assessment, monitoring and audits to meet the
requirements for the
specific pipeline/power line application construction and area
rehabilitation.
H. Degree 2 - Work requires the application of a sound
knowledge of the principles,
theories and practices of pedology with emphasis on the
physical characteristics of
soils, and involving related biological characteristics,
geography and
geomorphology. Familiarity with civil engineering practices,
area rehabilitation
technologies and areas of legislation and regulation pertinent
to pipeline/power line
construction is also required.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Work and recommendations are accepted as
accurate and are reviewed by the
Chief Environment Assessment and Surveillance Division for
soundness of judgment,
attainment of objectives and satisfaction of priorities.
B. Degree 2 - Professional guidance is available from the
supervisor and other
specialists for new work or special technical problems.
C. Degree 2 - Work requires identifying problems and
violations in pipeline and
power line construction submissions, construction and area
rehabilitation, and
recommending methods for resolution.
D. Degree 3 - Submissions from industry are technically
reviewed in detail for
conformance with objectives and compliance with
regulations.
E. Degree 2 - Results of analysis, operation and
construction activities and conditions
are observed and scientific observations and results are
interpreted to produce
meaningful assessments, conclusions or recommendations and
remedial actions.
|
|
|
Degree
|
F. Degree 3 - Specific technical advice is provided to
immediate supervisor, Board
Panel members, counsel and other senior staff on environmental
matters related to
geotechnical aspects of applications for pipelines and power
lines construction.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 1 - Work occasionally may require assigning tasks
to non-subordinate staff as
applicable.
B. Degree 1 - Prepares trip itinerary and logistics and
plans the use of equipment and
resources for own inspection and evaluation work.
C. Degree 1 - Usually limited to the spending of own time
and use of equipment and
supplies for own work.
D. Degree 2 - Recommends on the need and source for outside
assistance to the Chief,
for particular assessment, monitoring and other work related
to environment and
resources management.
E. Degree 2 - Ensures that relevant administrative
procedure, standards and terms and
conditions are maintained to ensure fulfillment and
conformance to requirements and
meet objectives.
F. Degree 3 - Coordinates field monitoring, audit and study
work with relevant
activities of pipeline and electrical power line companies,
other agencies and
construction companies. Must co-ordinates the reporting work
with the demands and
requirements of regulatory agencies.
G. Degree 2 - Implements office and field administrative
procedures established for
the work and as directed by the Board.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Results of the work affect the continuation of
projects related to
applications dealing with oil and gas pipelines and electrical
power lines, and the
level and frequency of inspection activities.
B. Degree 2 -
(i) Degree 2 - Results have economical and technological
impact on the pipeline and
power line construction industries, especially if violations
of the NEB
regulations are involved.
(ii) Degree 2 - Results contribute to conserving the
environment along power line and
pipeline rights-of-way.
(iii) Degree 2 - Results contribute to the control of
potentially hazardous
substances (oil, gas and electrical power).
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 2 - Results contribute to knowledge of the
environmental aspects and impacts
of pipeline and power line constructions, area terrain
stability and particularities,
and to the knowledge and control of adverse environmental
effects from the
construction of pipelines and power lines.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
- Assistant Director,
Environment Group
- Chief, Environmental Assessment and Surveillance
Division
- Senior Environmental Advisor
- Environmental Assessment Officers (4) PC-2
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION
DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 6
|
Level: 2
|
Descriptive Title: Energy and Mineral Commodities Research
Officer
|
|
Reporting to the Head of the Metallic Mineral Subsection:
|
|
Plans, organizes, conducts and evaluates
research projects on mineral ore and coal processing aimed at
improving knowledge and understanding of unit operations in
minerals and coal beneficiation (e.g., communication,
classification, gravity separation, froth flotation) for their
application. Studies technical literature to determine the best
line of attack; contacts other scientists and designs experiments
to provide the necessary data, identifies required equipment and
material and supervises the progress of experiments; secures
mineralogical and chemical analyses, performs X-ray fluorescence
analyses, evaluates results and simulates the performance of unit
operations using mathematical models.
Plans, organizes and conducts process
development projects aimed at improving the recovery of minerals
from Canadian ores, e.g., iron ores, sulphide ores, and coals, or
evaluating the potential for utilization or exploitation of
currently unused resources. Reviews technological developments
and applications, visits processing plants to identify
shortcomings of present recovery methods and discusses process
used in other areas of minerals beneficiation for developing new
processes and equipment.
Implements laboratory and pilot-plan trials,
supervises the implementation of field trials and instructs
industrial personnel in methods and procedures, compiles
performance data and formulates a basis for assessing the
viability of new processes and equipment. Organizes and
supervises the work of support technicians, scheduling, assigning
tasks, instructing in experimental procedures, checking and
reporting on work performance and maintaining safety
standards.
Prepares and discusses with Supervisor
technical reports and scientific papers based on experiments and
project findings for presentation, publication of technology
transfer purposes.
Assists in program development and provides
technical information to industry and government, conducting
literature surveys and developing research projects for
submission, maintaining awareness and analyzing and reporting on
problems in the minerals industry considering goals and
objectives. Responds to work-related inquiries from industry and
government.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - The objectives of the work are discussed
with, and clearly defined by the
Head of the Metallic Minerals Subsection and are influenced by
related technological
objectives of industry and other outside organizations.
B. Degree 2 - The work normally involves a number of
discrete medium- to long-term
research projects and process development studies and
investigations, for minerals
recovery enhancement, process and unit operations improvements
and exploitation of
potential mineral resources.
C. Degree 2 - The activities differ from one another and
consist of a variety of tasks
allied to the conduct of process development projects and
development of processes
and equipment by planned laboratory and pilot plant trials and
experiments on the
processing of mineral ores and beneficiation of coal;
allocating work; producing
technical reports; and, providing advice.
|
|
|
Degree
|
D. Degree 2 - Projects are organized, experiments planned,
approaches determined,
methods selected and work assigned and carried out to ensure
that defined
objectives for new or improved recovery of minerals are
met.
|
|
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - The work requires obtaining information by
direct observation of
laboratory experiments or pilot plant operations and by
amassing data from other
recognized sources and using existing or modified experimental
techniques.
B. Degree 2 - Information can normally be validated against
standard reference
materials, literature references and comparison with existing
mineral recovery
processes.
C. Degree 2 - Information is characterized by several
mineral and processing variables
requiring knowledgeable interpretation and an understanding of
pilot plant and
full-sized plan correlations, but the implications of the
outputs are generally
known.
D. Degree 2 - Relationships between the variables can
normally be established by
straight-forward laboratory investigations or literature
surveys, and
inconsistencies in the data can be resolved by repeat
observations.
E. Degree 2 - The work is affected by activities of other
scientists within the
organizational unit and occasionally by industry or other
outside sources (such as
the provincial regulatory agencies).
F. Degree 2 - Contacts are normally with other scientists
and engineers working in
mineral processing, beneficiation of coal or closely related
fields to exchange
information, discuss problems and to transfer technology.
Responds to inquiries
from industry and government.
G. Degree 3 - The work requires designing experiments,
developing new techniques and
industrial and experimental procedures, implementing
laboratory and pilot plan
trials, and establishing standards for X-Ray Fluorescence
analysis and
interpretation of X.R.F. assays.
H. Degree 2 - Work requires a sound knowledge of minerology
(mineral processing) and
the investigational methods used to develop mineral recovery
process and involving
physics, mathematics and special knowledge of X-Ray
Flurescence methodology and
applications. Familiarity with statistical tools and computers
and their use in
producing simulation models is necessary.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Work is accepted as technically accurate.
Evaluations and conclusions
are reviewed for consistency and completeness prior to
producing a final report.
B. Degree 3 - Professional guidance is available from the
Subsection Head to deal with
difficult process developments problems or approaches.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires identifying present
recovery method shortcomings and
mineral processing problems, adapting or devising methods and
processes for their
resolution, planning required investigations and evaluating
the results. While
objectives of the work are discussed with the Head, there is a
requirement to define
experiment objectives and to formulate a basis for assessing
viability of new
processes and equipment.
D. Degree 2 - The work of subordinate staff is checked for
the application of correct
methods and procedures and ensure work meets objectives and is
progressing towards
the aims of the research experiment.
E. Degree 2 - Scientific observations, results and findings
of experiments are
interpreted to produce meaningful reports, information and
recommendations.
|
|
|
Degree
|
F. Degree 2 - Advice is provided to support staff and
colleagues within the group and
the industry on mineral processing technology matters.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Supervises two technicians and one term
employee performing pilot plant
and laboratory experiments.
B. Degree 2 - Ensures the proper use of equipment,
facilities and supplies allocated to
the support staff for medium- and long-term experiments.
C. Degree 2 - Appropriate equipment, material and services
are identified for the
various research projects and, when allocated, their schedule
of use is organized.
D. Degree 2 - When required, recommends to the Head, on the
need for outside contract
or university assistance for supplementary or specialist
services.
E. Degree 2 - Ensures that safety, quality and quantity
standards are maintained as
work involves heavy equipment and results can imply industrial
process modifications
with their inherent hazards.
F. Degree 3 - Coordinates project and experiment activities
and scheduling with related
work of other scientists and technologists within the
organizational unit and with
others collaborating from other laboratories, research
organizations and the
industry.
G. Degree 2 - Implements office and laboratory
administrative procedures established
for the work.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - The direction and continuing operations of
the Subsection are affected by
the recommendations and decisions made on the nature of
experimental design, the use
of equipment and the limited pilot-plant facilities and by the
interpretation of the
results generated.
B. Degree 3 -
(i) Degree 3 - Project findings and
successful optimization of mineral recovery
processes have technological and economic effects with
commensurate savings to
the mineral industry and, to the focus of the research.
(ii) Degree 2 - Results of the work can contribute to more
efficient utilization and
to the development of mineral resources and the exploitation
of new mineral
deposits.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No other significant impact.
C. Degree 2 - Information and results of the work
contribute to the knowledge of, and
improvement in methods, techniques and procedures in mineral
processing and coal
beneficiation, and efficient extraction processes.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Head, Ore Dressing Section
- Head, Non-Metal Subsection
- Technician, Supervisory Technical Subsection
- Head, Research Technical Subsection
- Head, Metallic Minerals Subsection
- Research Scientists (SE-RES-2, 3)
- Engineer, Research and Development (EN-ENC)
- Research Officers PC-1
* - Energy and Mineral Commodities Research Officer
PC-2
- Technicians (up to 2) (EG)
- Temporary employee (1)
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 7
|
Level: 2
|
Descriptive Title: Physical Climatologist
|
|
|
|
Reporting to the Head, Lakes Climatology Unit:
|
|
Carries out research studies into the climatic interaction
between water bodies, the atmosphere and surrounding land areas
and studies hydro-meteorological and climatological problems
associated with lakes and reservoirs, particularly evaporation,
precipitation and surface water temperature.
Plans, organizes, supervises, and conducts
projects to gather hydro-meteorological and surface water
temperature data related to lakes and coastal zones, particularly
the Great Lakes, provided by satellite remote-sensing for
resource management and the development of lake regulation
policies and research activities or to meet various users needs
and involving the collection, reduction, analysis and
interpretation of remotely-sensed data. Determines survey
procedure. Modifies existing techniques or develops new ones for
data analysis, acquisition, processing and evaluation. Determines
and recommends type of archival data required. Directs and
supervises the work of technical support staff.
Prepares and reviews environmental impact
assessments of the effects of human activities and industrial
facilities on reservoirs and other large water bodies. Collects,
collates, archives, analyses and evaluates data associated with
these studies.
Advises managers within own field of
specialization and provides specialized scientific advice and
guidance to other climatologists and professionals and acts as
representative at project meetings and on committees involved in
satellite remote-sensing of water temperature, and lake
climatology. Coordinates cooperative study activities and
collaborates in research programs. Assists users in determining
nature of the requirements and appropriate procedures to arrive
at results.
Assists in climatic impact assessment to
identify the nature and implications of climatic change for
Canadian lakes and reservoirs, relating scientific knowledge of
climate to socio-economic concerns, adapting and using
methodology such as statistical and multi-disciplinary models for
measuring impact, and evaluates the potential socio-economic
effects of climate change. Writes reports and provides scientific
information and illustrative material such as maps on study and
project results or findings. Reviews literature, participates in
various working groups and maintains required contacts with other
specialists to keep current in climatological methods and
techniques, photogrammetry and remote sensing, hydrology and
Great Lakes environmental research.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
2
|
A. Degree 3 - Study or project areas and objectives are
identified in consultation with
user representatives and discussed and agreed with the Unit
Head. Objectives are
in terms of requirements for scientific support or
co-operative studies to provide
scientific data and assessments for water resource management,
lake level regulation
and research studies.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 2 - Work normally consists of carrying out a
number of climatological search
and data-gathering projets, studying hydrometeorological and
climatological problems
and assisting in the assessments of the impact of climatic
change and the environ
mental impact of the effects of facilities or industrial or
commercial activities on
lakes and reservoirs, interpreting and evaluating the data and
producing reports.
C. Degree 2 - The work involves undertaking projects or
investigations related to
land-air-water interactions on climatological time scales,
studying hydro
meteorological and climatological problems associated with
lakes and reservoirs,
gathering hydrometeorological and environmental data relating
to lakes and coastal
zones, interpreting data of environmental parameters and the
output signals of
sensors from satellite and airborne scientific equipment,
allocating work and
providing advice.
D. Degree 2 - Projects, investigations or studies are
planned and conducted; approaches,
type of data and methods for the gathering, analyses and
evaluation of the data are
determined and tasks are assigned to ensure objectives are
met.
|
|
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
2
|
A. Degree 3 - The work requires obtaining, processing and
interpreting data of
environmental parameters as provided by various satellite and
airborne scientific
equipment in the form of sensor output signals and obtained
from the Service, the
Satellite Laboratory and a diversity of other sources. Ways
must be devised to
exploit available data to represent over-water conditions as
there are few long-term
institutional observations over the lakes and climatological
land data. Data may be
difficult to collect and select and must be blended and
reduced using various
adaptations of procedures.
B. Degree 2 - Archived information and data are validated
before being entered. Other
data can usually be acceptably validated by comparison with
other related analysis
results or literature references.
C. Degree 3 - Climatological information and data such as
pertaining to interactions
between water bodies and the atmosphere, the water bodies with
surrounding land
areas and the atmosphere with the land areas are characterized
by several variables,
variability, poorly defined variables and some ambiguity, and
require interpretation.
D. Degree 3 - The relationship between four dimensional
environment variables
(earth-air-water-time) are inter-related in complex ways, can
be conflicting and
require interpretation, interpolation or extrapolation.
E. Degree 2 - Survey or study work conducted in cooperation
with other scientists can
be affected by their activities or by user demands.
F. Degree 2 - Contacts are with others involved in satellite
remote sensing, climatology
and related disciplines to provide or exchange information and
participate in the
resolution of problems.
G. Degree 2 - The work requires the adaptation or
modification of analysis techniques
and methods for non-standard situations. Changes in the
methods, techniques, and
algorithms used in satellite remote sensing due to innovations
in the sensors,
enhanced physical-spectral relationships or increased computer
power must be
assessed and incorporated into the present methodologies where
appropriate.
H. Degree 2 - The work requires the application of a sound
knowledge of climatology,
meteorology and remote sensing, complemented by a knowledge of
the related fields of
physical limnology, air - water interaction, geography and
familiarity with the
techniques of socio-economic data analysis and computer
programming.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Professional Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - The work requires the completion of
assignments, the interpretation of
results and the preparation of the report. Work is reviewed by
the Head on
conclusion of the assignment.
B Degree 2 - Professional guidance is available on studies
and assessment involving
new satellite remote sensing methods, techniques and
algorithms such as due to
innovations in sensors enhanced physical-spectral
relationships and greater
computer power.
C. Degree 2 - The work requires the use of judgment in
recognizing problems, selecting
approaches, interpreting analyses, adapting methodologies and
resolving technical
difficulties or to determine the corrections required to the
radiation measurements
for the effects of the atmosphere in the derivation of surface
water temperature.
D. Degree 2 - The work of support staff is reviewed in
progress and on completion to
determine effectiveness of methods and validity of
conclusions. The results of
analyses of contractor's work are evaluated for acceptability
of results and the
requirements to modify existing projects.
E. Degree 2 - The scientific observations and the results
of studies and analysis must
be interpreted, blended or reduced for meaningful reporting
and dissemination.
F. Degree 2 - Advice is provided to climatologists,
professionals within the Service
and other government departments, universities and private
industry on matters
pertaining to physical climatology and within area of
specialization.
|
|
Management Responsibilities
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - The work requires the supervision of a
support staff consisting of one
technician, a clerk and seasonal or term employees.
B. Degree 2 - Ensures proper use of the equipment and
supplies allocated to particular
survey, study or project.
C. Degree 2 - Resources are identified for each assignment
including the requirement
for collaborative work from staff of another work unit when
required for the work.
D. Degree 3 - Substantiates the need and expenditures of
funds for outside expertise
and develops the specifications for work to be done under
contract, identifies
suitable sources and arranges for available assistance.
E. Degree 2 - Monitors progress of contracted work and the
work of support staff, and
ensures that quality and quantity standards are met.
F. Degree 2 - Coordinates cooperative study activities with
other scientists in the
Service and agencies such as when required to obtain the
interdiscipline information
necessary for Great Lakes studies.
G. Degree 2 - Implements office and field administrative
procedures established for the
work.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations
|
2
|
A. Degree 3 - Information and results of the work are used
in the elaboration of, and
can affect lake level regulation policies and influence
conclusions and recommendations on Great Lakes observing
networks and studies related to this research. Data and analyses
support relevant ongoing work of units of the Federal and
Provincial governments in Canada, U.S. Federal and State
agencies, universities and private industry. Information and
advice are considered as authoritative within the field of the
work of the position.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 2 -
(i) Degree 2 - Results of the work and their effect on
regulation can impact on
particular installation process using water as a resource.
(ii) Degree 2 - Results of the work contribute to the
management of the water
resources for protecting and conserving Canada's surface water
resources.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No other significant impact.
C. Degree 2 - Effective exploitation of available data,
meaningful interpretation of
output signals of sensors, sound extrapolation and
interpolation of data, and
meaningful result presentation contribute to the knowledge in
a field of work where
few long term institutional observations exist, and to a
greater understanding of
climatology.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Superintendent, Lakes and Marine Applications
Head, Lakes Climatology Unit
* - Physical Climatologist (Networks and Surveys)
PC-2
- Technician
- Clerk
- Summer Student(s)
- Term Employee(s)
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 8
|
Level: 2
|
Descriptive Title: Aquatic Scientist, Monitoring and Field
Studies
|
|
Reporting to the Head Monitoring and Surveys Division:
|
|
Plans, organizes and conducts aquatic ecosystem
and environmental quality surveys, monitoring studies and
projects in the Atlantic Region, to obtain and analyze
information and scientific data on the state of the aquatic
ecosystem, for water resource management, quality control and
required reporting. Reviews and assesses impact on aquatic
ecosystem of industrial development plans, water utilization and
land-use proposals and effects of hydrologic dynamics,
atmospheric, demography, geography and watershed geology. Reviews
and interprets available multi-disciplinary data information and
identifies and recommends on data requirements, required survey
and trend monitoring studies and necessary equipment and
resources to meet work objectives.
Determines the environmental parameters (e.g.,
physical, hydrological, chemical, biological) and matrices (e.g.,
sediment, surface/groundwater, precipitation and biota) to be
measured; determines monitoring and survey locations considering
such factors as geology, geomorphology, land use activities,
basin size, stream flow and gradients; the sampling and measuring
techniques, discussing the analytical method with staff of the
Analytical Service Division, the parameter capabilities, the
samples preservation and handling techniques for sediment, water
and biota; develops optimum sampling frequencies considering the
various factors and site specific information; and, directs the
collection and ensures the preservation and integrity of the
samples. Modifies, evaluates and ensures proper installation and
maintenance of instruments and equipment used and recommends
monitoring applications and testing of new sensing
instruments.
Analyses, evaluates and interprets the data
gathered on water, sediment, aquatic biota and precipitation and
their relationships, relating data to water quality objectives
and guidelines for determining the fate and pathways, dissipation
rates and sinks of toxics, defining problems, reporting on level
and tendencies of pollutants and forecasting potential danger
trends; to provide scientific and technical evidences of baseline
conditions, emerging issues, state of aquatic quality, spatial
and temporal trends, effectiveness of water resource management
compliance with aquatic quality objectives and monitoring
agreements or for recommendations on future actions.
Consults scientists of other agencies on
methods used for assembling, analyzing and interpreting the data
and dissemination of the results. Selects and adapts computerized
and statistical analysis techniques, consolidates and processes
environmental data from various sources and data bases for
developing models, describing environmental processes, seasonal
patterns, and long term trends of Long Range Transported Air
Pollutants (LRTAP) parameters or for assembling, analyzing and
interpreting hydrological cycle data.
Determines field survey logistic support and
establishes requirement time-schedule, coordinates activities
with other agencies' scientists involved in joint or cooperative
studies. Assigns work to support staff, supervises and provides
instructions and guidance, and recommends on training needs.
Writes study reports and papers for
presentation and prepares proposals for enhanced monitoring,
specific studies, and cooperative projects. Participates on study
groups, committees and joint projects with engineers and
scientists of other disciplines for the planning of sediment,
limnological, hydrological and precipitation studies.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kind of Assignments
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - The objective of the environmental survey,
monitoring and assessment work
performed are clearly defined by the Head.
B. Degree 2 - The work involves organizing and carrying out
a number of detailed
field studies, surveys or project on the state of the aquatic
resource and the
effects of various factors or conditions on its quality and
sustainability and
participating on joint projects and cooperative studies of a
multi-disciplinary
nature.
C. Degree 2 - The activities involve organizing, carrying
out and supervising
monitoring and survey activities and related sampling and
measurement work in the
field; gathering and assessing environmental data; preparing
study reports and
scientific papers on findings, problems and trends; allocating
work and instructing
support staff.
D. Degree 2 - The work requires planning the monitoring and
field survey activities,
determining the environmental parameters and matrices to be
measured, the locations,
approaches and techniques for the measuring and the sampling,
and the data analysis
work to meet established objectives.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Information and data are usually obtained from
field survey observations,
monitoring devices and recording instruments, river, lake and
groundwater water,
sediment and biological samples, analytical results and,
measurements of environ
mental parameters and matrices, as well as from other studies,
scientific reports by
other agencies or publications from recognized sources.
B. Degree 2 - Information and data can normally be validated
using known procedures for
repeat measurements and confirmation sampling or by reference
to related literature.
C. Degree 3 - The information and data pertaining to the
diversity of factors affecting
aquatic quality and the sustainability of the water resource,
the parameters and
matrices to be measured, the measurement and sampling location
and frequencies, and
the toxic substances and their transformation are
characterized by several variables
involving interpretation, poorly defined variability and
ambiguities.
D. Degree 3 - The relationships between the diverse gathered
data to be interpreted,
the variables affecting the measurements, location, sampling,
and the assessments
required, the environmental parameters and matrices to be
measured and the issues
under investigation, can be conflicting and require
investigation, synthesizing and
interpretation.
E. Degree 2 - Work is normally affected by the activities
and requirements of others
within the organizational unit and of other scientists outside
the unit when
participating on joint field surveys, projects or cooperative
studies.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists and engineers on
joint or related studies or
projects for resolving problems, exchanging information and
for participation on
cooperative studies with scientists of other branches or
departments, and agencies
of other governments involved in the control of aquatic
environmental quality.
G. Degree 2 - The work requires adapting or modifying
sampling and measuring techniques
for the parameters to me measured, making modifications to
monitoring devices,
measuring and recording instruments and adapting data
processing and statistical
analysis methods for the work.
H. Degree 2 - The work requires the application of a sound
knowledge of physical
geography involving hydrology, geology and limnology
complemented by sufficient familiarity with theories and
practices of work related disciplines such as climatology,
biology and chemistry that are pertinent to the work.
Familiarity with statistical
analysis methods and computer application is also
required.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
A. Degree 2 - Measurement, results of analysis and assessment
work are accepted as technically correct. Recommendations and
conclusions are discussed with other scientists and reviewed by
the Head for consistency and completeness.
B. Degree 3 - Professional guidance on the resolution of new
and difficult studies or monitoring problems can be obtained from
the Head, higher level scientists or from scientists in other
disciplines related to the work.
C. Degree 2 - The work requires identifying
monitoring and survey problems, defining information and data
needed, determining the environmental parameters and matrices to
be measured, the monitoring and survey location and the sampling
frequencies. Approaches and suitable techniques are identified to
deal with measurement, data acquisition and analysis
difficulties.
D. Degree 3 - The work requires reviewing
related scientific proposals, results and methods used in the
field of water quality monitoring, surveillance and pollution
control, from scientists of other organizations, to assess their
applicability to current or planned studies. Reviews and assesses
development plans and proposals of specific industries as to
validity of data and completeness for assessment of impact on
aquatic quality.
E. Degree 2 - Own and subordinates
scientific observations, monitoring and survey findings, sampling
results and calculations must be synthesized and interpreted to
provide meaningful conclusions, recommendations or reports.
F. Degree 3 - Advice on data and findings
interpretation and applied techniques is provided to other
scientists and the superior. Provides technical advice to
colleagues and guidance to support staff on monitoring and
aquatic quality survey work, the measuring, testing and sampling
equipment and the quality assurance techniques to be used.
Management
Responsibility
A. Degree 2 - Work requires supervision of support staff
consisting of one scientist and one technician.
B. Degree 2 - Ensures the proper installation and
maintenance of monitoring devices,
instruments and other equipment and supplies allocated for the
work.
C. Degree 2 - Determines the requirements for resources and
recommends on the need for
instrumentation and other equipment.
D. Degree 3 - Substantiates the needs,
defines specific requirements for consultant studies and the
technical scope of contracted monitoring or survey work and
services, and arrange for available assistance.
E. Degree 2 - Ensures that work quality, quantity and safety
standards and guidelines are maintained.
F. Degree 3 - The work often requires
coordinating related activities with those of other scientists or
groups within the Branch, other departments or agencies of other
governments participating in joint surveys and studies or using
work results.
G. Degree 2 - Implements field and other administrative and
safety procedures and guidelines established for the work.
Impact of Recommendations and
Activities
2
A. Degree 2 - Information and results of the work and
recommendations affect the intensity and direction of the
monitoring, survey and required reporting activities and the
water resource management practices in the region.
B. Degree 3 -
(i) Degree 2 - Results of the work and recommendation on
industrial and urban development proposals can have technological
or economic effects on the sector of industry that use water as a
resource and influence decisions on expenditures to enhance or
protect the aquatic environment.
(ii) Degree 3 - Results of the work and recommendations affect
the environmental quality, the state of the aquatic ecosystem and
sustainability of the water resource.
(iii) Degree 2 - Results of the work and recommendation
contribute to the preservation of the availability and the
enhancement of the quality of water used by urban community.
(iv) No other significant impact.
C. Degree 2 - Result of surveys, studies and monitoring work
and assessments contribute knowledge on the state of the aquatic
resource of the region, the factors affecting its quality and
sustainability, and on effective water resource management
practices.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHARTChief, Water Quality
Branch, Atlantic Region - Head, Monitoring and Surveys
* - Aquatic Scientist, Monitoring and Field Studies
PC-2
- Aquatic Scientists PC-1 (Term)
- Technician (EG)
- Aquatic Scientists, Assessment PC-2
- Specialist, Toxic Assess. (CH-1)
- Instrument and Data System (EL-7)
- Computer Programmer (CS-1)
- Data Processor (DA-PRO-4)
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 9
|
Level: 2
|
Descriptive Title: Field Experiment Support Scientist
|
|
Reporting to the Chief of the Experimental Studies Division,
Atmospheric Research Directorate:
|
|
Plans, organizes and conducts activities pertaining to field
experiments for the measurement of atmospheric trace gases and as
part of the joint effort of the division's scientists, using
stratospheric balloons launched from disparate and remote
locations and a variety of instrumental techniques (e.g.
spectrophotometry, interferometry, radiometry).
Develops new or improved techniques, space
instrumentation and electronic and computer control systems.
Designs and implements laboratory calibration procedures for
flight instrumentation. Schedules the preparation of the
instrumentation for field projects. Assesses the readiness and
success probability of payload instrumentation for required
logistical decision and launch planning. Directs the work of
technical support staff and oversees the integration into, and
the testing of the instrumentation in
the balloon payload before flights, and
monitors and reports on the operational status and effectiveness
of the instruments during the mission.
Analyzes, interprets and evaluates the data gathered in the
measurement programs for information on
the distribution and temporal and spatial
variability of stratospheric gases, developing analysis
procedure, reducing data using computer and writing programs when
required to integrate physical parameters measured, and process
resulting data set, making critical assessments of the data and
results of the analysis obtained, and developing models to show
the source, movement and fate of atmospheric trace gases.
Designs and develops remote sensing instrumentation involving
the application of optical design technique and microprocessor
technology and the development of control software for
experimental micro-computer operated instrumentation.
Advises and provides technical guidance in own field of
specialization and on specialized software development for
micro-computers to members of related projects and others within
the Division. Recommends external support including the use and
the acquisition of new equipment and software when
appropriate.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Objectives are defined by the chief and in
consultation with the project
scientists and are in terms of the instrumentation required
and the particular experiments to be conducted for specific
scientific measurements of stratospheric gases.
B. Degree 2 - The work consists of a number of discrete
projects or research studies
involving the development and monitoring of instrumentation
and the analysis,
assessment and interpretation of measurement data concerning
stratospheric gases as
part of joint scientific efforts.
C. Degree 2 - The work involves planning and conducting
relevant phases of field
experiments requiring the development of electro-optical
instrumentation, the
integration into, and the testing of the instrumentation in
the balloon payload, the
monitoring during the mission, the analysis of the measurement
data gathered, the
provision of advice and the allocation of work to technical
support staff.
|
|
|
Degree
|
D. Degree 2 - Plans, organizes and conducts the development,
preparation, integration
and testing of the instrumentation, determines the approaches,
selects the measurement data gathering techniques and
analysis method, and determine the type and content of study
report to meet the particular experiment objective.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Data obtained from infrequent and difficult
field ventures, and raw data
need extensive refinement and require difficult evaluation to
yield results.
B. Degree 3 - Data can only be verified and this only over a
period of time by
inter comparing a large number of results, work published by
other researchers and by
comparison to internal measurements obtained by different
techniques.
C. Degree 3 - Information and data pertaining to the
instrumental measurement and
capture of, and the information data concerning the source,
movement and distribution
of stratospheric gases, their temporal and spatial variability
and their fate are
characterized by several variables, poorly defined variability
and some ambiguities.
D. Degree 3 - Relationships between variables affecting the
success probability of
payload instrumentation or the instrumental measurement of the
distribution and
temporal and spatial variability of stratospheric gases, their
source, movement and
fate can be conflicting and require careful analysis,
interpretation and assessment.
E. Degree 2 - Logistical decisions must be made and
procedures arranged in concert w ch
other scientists using the balloon gondola. Work is normally
affected by others n
the same group and to a lesser extent by external scientists
involved in the balloon
launch programs or collaborating in the research.
F. Degree 2 - Contacts are with other scientists involved in
the area of atmospheric
gas research and with contractors, to exchange information on
the work and discuss
problems.
G. Degree 3 - The work requires the development of
analytical remote sensing techniques
and instrumental techniques for the capture and the
measurement of the scientific
data required and of effective procedures for their
analysis.
H. Degree 2 - The work requires the appreciation of a sound
knowledge of physics with
particular emphasis on dynamics of gases, optics, solid state
physics, electronic
and meteorology, complemented by familiarity with pertinent
practices of other
disciplines, e.g. photometry, spectroscopy, chemistry and
mechanics, engineering,
computer science.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 2 - Studies and reports summarizing results of
research project are discussed
with other scientists concerned with the results and
publishing. Project work is
reviewed by the Chief for consistency and completeness.
B. Degree 3 - Little technical direction is provided.
Professional advice on the
resolution of the difficult problems can be obtained from the
Division Chef or from
other scientists in related fields or cooperating in the
research.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires identifying problems and new
avenues for the capture of
measurements data by remote sensing, devising effective
instrumentation and control
systems, and determining approaches to resolve problems.
D. Degree 2 - The work of technical support staff is
reviewed for quality and validity
of testing results and conclusions. Project proposals
pertaining to area of
specialization are evaluated for feasibility and
recommendations.
E. Degree 2 - Scientific observations, measurements, data
and results of research are
interpreted to produce meaningful conclusions, reports and
recommendations.
F. Degree 3 - Specific advice pertaining to technological
approaches and required
instrumentation and control systems design and development
within own field of
specialization is provided to scientists working in the same
or related field.
Guidance on technical matters is provided to other scientists
contributing to the
work and to technical support staff.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Management Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Directs the work and trains a varying number
of support staff in the
specialized tasks required by the research, and oversees and
monitors progress of
work to ensure timely completion and meet the objectives.
B. Degree 2 - Controls the use and maintenance of allocated
scientific equipment.
C. Degree 2 - Identifies requirements for equipment, the
services required and the
acquisition of scientific instrumentation and material for the
design and
construction of space remote sensing instrumentation, and
recommends on technical
resources allocation for the project.
D. Degree 2 - Recommends the need for external support when
required.
E. Degree 2 - Monitors and insures that quality and
quantity of the work meet standards
and recommends changes to the daily routine in the lab and in
the field to improve
work efficiency and for successful and timely completion of
project.
F. Degree 2 - Coordinates activities with other scientists
supporting the project
within the division and with outside groups such as university
and other government
groups in completing project and the publication of joint
study results.
G. Degree 2 - Implements administrative and field procedures
established for the work.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
2
|
A. Degree 2 - Results of the work and recommendations on
technical matters related to
the Not Balloon Measurement Program, impact on the
design and purchase of the
equipment for the stratospheric measurement data gathering and
affect the schedule
and number of balloon projects or the continuation of balloon
launch experiments.
B. Degree 2 -
(i) Degree 2 - Results of the work may lead to the
regulatory control of
stratopheric polluting products or industrial process
technology.
(ii) Degree 2 - Results of the work contribute to the
improvement of the protection
and conservation of the environment.
(iii) Degree 2 - Results of the work
contribute stratospheric pollution information
needed for regulation aimed at safeguarding public health.
(iv) No other significant impact.
C. Degree 3 - Development of new instrumental methods to
measure stratospheric
constituents and results of experiments affects the
development and testing of hypo
thesis about the stratosphere by other scientists and
contribute to the enhancement
of basic scientific knowledge about the stratosphere and to a
better understanding
of stratospheric photochemistry, the source, movements and
fate of atmospheric trace
gases and the effects of anthropoqenic alterations to the
upper atmosphere.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director, Atmospheric Processes Research Branch
* Chief, Experimental Studies Division
- Field Experiment Support Scientist PC-2
- Technicians
- Field Experiment Support Scientist PC-1
- Satellite Data Scientist PC-2
- Space Shuttle Scientist PC-2
- Research Scientists (RES-3)
- Project Physical Scientist PC-2
- Radiatiometer Systems Technology (EG) * Bench-mark
position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 10
|
Level: 3
|
Descriptive Title: Scientific Evaluator, Medical Devices
|
|
Reporting to the Head, Pre-market Review Section:
|
|
Evaluates the physics data contained in medical device
submissions subject to pre-market review, such as devices
implanted for intimate contact with living tissue for long
periods of time, to determine the acceptability of the device in
meeting standards of safety and efficacy. Adapts the scientific
approach and methodology in the evaluation process and conducts a
scientific appraisal of the physics data to validate the claims
of the manufacturer.
Evaluates the design theory, principles and
modes of operation, physical performance parameters, safety
factors, potential for failure and fragility and sensitivity to
interferences by external effects and forces to arrive at sound
scientific conclusions concerning the performance, safety and
efficacy of the device.
Reviews all labeling requirements and manufacturer's claims to
ensure compliance with the Medical Devices Regulations.
Determines whether the proposed manufacturing and quality control
standards for the medical device are acceptable to ensure the
safety of operation and stability in the clinical performance of
the device.
Plans, collaborates in, and conducts test
systems to assess critical characteristics, analyses physical
data, and carries out theoretical calculations to determine
compliance with performance standards.
Prepares a detailed report summarizing the
findings and judgments reached, identifies problem areas and
deficiencies, informs the manufacturer of requirements and areas
for further device or data development, formulates a
comprehensive recommendation concerning acceptance or rejection
of the submission and provides a scientific rationale for the
conclusion.
Conducts a continual study and review of
medical device design theory, manufacturing processes and modes
of use affecting device safety, and provides advice on the
identification of potential hazards and deficiencies associated
with new or existing medical devices.
Develops and recommends guidelines and criteria
of acceptance for new medical devices subject to pre-market
review.
Assists in the development of research proposals in problem
areas relating to test procedures, medical device standards and
other physics problems identified during the evaluation of
medical device submissions to ensure that timely and relevant
research is carried out within the Branch, and that Canadian
standards for medical devices are developed when required.
Specifications
|
Degree
|
Kind of Assignments
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the Section Head in
terms of assignments
involving the scientific appraisal of the physics data of
several evaluation
submissions for medical devices subject to pre-market
review.
B. Degree 3 - The work involves the comprehensive
evaluation and assessment of the
physics data in medical device submissions to determine the
acceptability of the
device in meeting standards of safety and efficacy.
C. Degree 3 - The work involves the evaluation and
assessment of physical,
biomechanical, engineering and electronic data, the review of
manufacturing
processes, clinical performance, potential for failure and
sensitivity to interferences, a critical review of proposed
standards and test procedures, and the provision of advice.
D. Degree 3 - Adapts scientific approaches and
methodologies, and plans, organizes and
conducts a broad diversity of studies and evaluations of the
physics data and
submissions pertaining to the medical devices subject to
pre-market review, their
design theory, principles and mode of operation, performance
safety, manufacturing
process, and the identification of potential hazards and
deficiencies of new or
existing medical devices.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - The work requires obtaining information from
a critical review of
submitted data, and requesting the development and submission
of specific additional
data for new medical devices for which there is often no
information available in the
scientific literature and no published standards. The only
information available is
that supplied by the device manufacturer in the submission and
requires
interpretation and selection to use.
B. Degree 3 - The information and data supplied by medical
device manufacturers can
normally be validated by a critical review of the physics
data, laboratory based
investigations and detailed literature referencing.
C. Degree 4 - The information and data contained in
submissions relating to new medical
devices and novel theories and modes of operation may include
complicated and
conflicting technical data and ambiguous information on
physical characteristics,
biocompability of materials and clinical performance.
Judgments as to the
acceptability of the data must be made.
D. Degree 4 - Relationships between the physics data
submitted, clinical performance,
potential for failure and sensitivity to interference are
complicated and require
critical evaluation and review to resolve conflicts and
interpretation problems.
E. Degree 3 - The work is frequently affected by the
activities of other scientists and
evaluators providing or requesting additional information on
the physics aspects of
the submissions.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists and officials of
the medical device industry
and other agencies to exchange information, resolve
differences or problems and
provide advice.
G. Degree 3 - The work requires adapting the scientific
approach and methodologies in
the evaluation process to suit the unique requirements, and
each submission.
H. Degee 4 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the
principles, theories and practices of physics involving
physical chemistry,
engineering physics, bioengineering and electronics and a good
knowledge of medical
device manufacturing technologies.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Approaches to conducting scientific
evaluations and final recommendations
and conclusions are reviewed for soundness of judgment.
B. Degree 3 - Professional guidance is received from the
Section Head on the interpretation of ambiguous physics data or
on the resolution of difficult problems.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires identifying problems with
medical device design, performance or manufacture,
incomplete, missing or biased data, and conclusions, and
adapting scientific approaches and methodologies for the
evaluation of medical device
submissions and the resolution of difficult problems.
D. Degree 3 - The results and findings of other scientists
in the area of medical device
physics are reviewed for appropriateness in assessing medical
device submissions.
E. Degree 3 - Physics data, results and conclusions are
interpreted to determine the
validity and acceptability of data contained in medical device
submissions.
F. Degree 3 - Advice is given to other scientists on the
interpretation of physical data
and to officials in the medical device industry on the
acceptability of proposed
device standards.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - As applicable, work is assigned to
non-subordinate support staff.
B. Degree 1 - Plans the use of equipment and supplies for
own work.
C. Degree 1 - Limited to the spending of own time and to
the use of equipment and
supplies for own work.
D. Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required, is
requested from the Section Head.
E. Degree 1 - Complies with administrative procedures,
directives and guidelines
established for the work.
F. Degree 3 - Coordinates the collection of additional
physics information from medical
device manufacturers, and investigations and scientific
appraisals with other
scientists.
G. Degree 1 - Follows administrative and safety procedures
established for the work.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Results and decisions of scientific
appraisals are used in the
administration of the Food and Drugs Act and Regulations in
general, and in the
clearance of individual medical device submissions, as well as
in the development of
Canadian standards for medical devices.
B. Degree 3 -
(i) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the work
affect the regulatory
approval and control of medical devices and may lead to
economic or
technological effects on the medical device industry.
(ii) No significant impact.
(iii) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice, and results of the
work affect the approval
of medical devices in Canada and contribute to the
establishment of standards
which ensure the continued safety and efficacy of each device
sold in Canada.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - The evaluation of the submitted physics data
and the development of
research proposals provide knowledge and improved
understanding of the physics of
medical devices.
|
|
Linear OrganizationChart
Chief, Pre-market Division
Head, Pre-market Review Section
* - Scientific Evaluators, Medical Devices (3) PC-3 -
Scientific Evaluators, Medical Devices (4) (BI)
- Scientific Reviewers (2) (BI)
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 11
|
Level: 3
|
Descriptive Title: Standards Development Officer, Medical
Devices
|
|
Reporting to the Head, Standards and Testing Section:
|
|
Organizes and carries out projects to develop
and establish new national and international safety, performance
and labeling standards, either as mandatory requirements under
the Food and Drugs Act, or as voluntary standards in cooperation
with extra-governmental standards-writing organizations.
Assesses and interprets scientific information
and data and resolves conflicting information concerning the
safety and effectiveness of medical devices, such as anesthesia
equipment, cardiac life support systems, infusion pumps, computer
assisted monitoring equipment and prosthetic devices to assemble
an accurate data base for standards development.
Establishes acceptable safety, physical
performance and disclosure criteria for classes of medical
devices, in consultation with other scientists, health profession
user groups, manufacturers, professional associations, domestic,
foreign and international standards-writing organizations in
government and industry.
Organizes and coordinates work with outside
advisory committees to provide advice to the Branch on the
content of medical device standards, and represents the Branch as
a scientific expert on independent standards development
committees of organizations such as the Canadian Standards
Association and International Organization for Standardization
developing voluntary standards for use by the industry and for
adoption by the Branch.
Drafts detailed and comprehensive standards for
medical devices, and ensures the scientific and technical
adequacy of the draft regulations through all stages of review,
revision and approval. Develops test procedures and
specifications and provides advice on their use for the
monitoring and regulatory compliance programs in the Branch.
Designs and conducts theoretical studies and
laboratory based physics experiments to evaluate risks and
benefits of medical device classes, such as electro-surgery
units, anesthetic gas-handling machines, infant incubators and
micro-controlled infusion pumps to provide information for
setting priorities, and to recommend appropriate solutions to
identified problems. Develops theoretical models of the physical
processes involved in device operation, malfunction and failure
and tests the models through calculations, laboratory experiments
or computer simulations to predict the behavior of devices under
clinical conditions, misuse, or failure. Conducts studies and
surveys to assess the scientific and economic feasibility of
establishing standards for high-priority medical devices.
Conducts a continual study and review of
medical device design theory, manufacturing processes and modes
of use affecting device safety, and provides advice, based on a
recognized expertise on the physics aspects of safety
performance, effectiveness and reliability of complex medical
devices to medical practitioners, standards-writing
organizations, and scientists and officials in the medical device
manufacturing industry, health care system and government
agencies.
Specifications
Degree
|
Kind of
Assignments
3
A. Degree 3- Objectives are defined by the Section Head in
terms of assignments
involving the development of technical standards, the
scientific appraisal of the
physics data, and the conduct of laboratory based physics
experiments to evaluate
risks for several classes of medical devices.
B. Degree 3- The work involves comprehensive studies to
evaluate medical device risks
and assess the requirement for standards, and the conduct of
cooperative projects to
develop technical standards.
C. Degree 3- The work involves the evaluation and assessment
of physical, biomechanical,
engineering and electronic data, the conduct of theoretical
and laboratory based
studies, the identification of requirements and the
development of technical
standards, and the provision of advice.
D. Degree 3- Plans, organizes, coordinates and performs a
broad diversity of scientific
evaluations and laboratory based studies to identify and
evaluate medical device
performance, health risks, establish safety and physical
performance and disclosure
criteria for classes of medical devices, and plans and
conducts comprehensive
projects to develop technical standards for classes of medical
devices.
|
Complexity of
Work
4
4
|
A. Degree 3- The work requires obtaining information and
data from a critical review of
scientific data obtained from the manufacturer or in the
scientific literature, or
from the conduct of theoretical studies and laboratory based
physics experiments.
B. Degree 3 - The information and data supplied by medical
device manufacturers can
normally be validated by a critical review of the physics
data, laboratory based
investigations and detailed literature referencing.
C. Degree 4 - The information and data used in the
development of technical standards
for medical devices may include complicated and conflicting
technical data and
ambiguous information on physical characteristics,
biocompability of materials and
clinical performance. Judgments as to the acceptability of the
data must be made.
D. Degree 4 - Relationships between the physics data
submitted, clinical performance,
potential for failure and sensitivity to interference are
complicated and require
critical evaluation and review to resolve conflicts and
interpretation problems.
E. Degree 3- The work is frequently affected by the
activities of other scientists,
health professionals, and international standards
organizations providing information
on the performance characteristics and health and safety risks
of medical devices.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists and officials of
the medical device industry,
other government departments and agencies, such as Atomic
Energy Control Board,
Transport, Labor, Justice, Communications and National
Research Council, national
and international standards organizations, and with health
professionals to exchange
information, resolve differences or problems and provide
advice.
G. Degree 4- The work requires the design of theoretical
studies and laboratory based
physics experiments, and the development of theoretical models
and test procedures
for the identification and measurement of medical device
hazards.
H. Degree 4 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the
principles, theories and practices of physics involving
physical chemistry,
bio-physics, engineering physics, bioengineering and
electronics and a good
knowledge of medical device manufacturing technologies.
|
|
Degree
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Approaches to identifying specific risks and
requirements for standards
development, and final recommendation and conclusions
concerning medical device
standards are reviewed for soundness of judgment.
B. Degree 3 - Professional guidance is received from the
Section Head on the
interpretation of ambiguous physics data or on the resolution
of difficult problems
such as involving conflicting scientific information and
relating to safety and
effectiveness of sophisticated and complex devices, scientific
and economic
feasibility of establishing standards for particular high
priority medical devices
or to solve special problems concerning medical devices,
compliance, violation,
protocols and regulations.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires identifying problems with
medical device design,
performance or manufacture, determining approaches for
resolution including the
development of standards, and organizing projects for the
development of specific
medical device technical standards.
D. Degree 3 - The results and findings of other scientists,
health professionals, and
standards-writing organizations in the area of medical device
physics are reviewed
for appropriateness in assessing medical device hazards and
technical standards.
E. Degree 3 - Physics data, results and conclusions are
interpreted to determine the
validity and acceptability of data for use in the development
of technical standards
for medical devices.
F. Degree 4- Advice based on a recognized expertise on the
physics aspects of safety
performance, effectiveness and reliability of complex medical
devices is given to
medical practitioners, standards-writing organizations, and
scientists and officials
in the medical device manufacturing industry, health care
system and government
agencies.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
1
|
A. Degree 1 - As applicable, work is assigned to
non-subordinate support staff.
B. Degree 1 - Plans the use of equipment and supplies for
own work.
C. Degree 1 - Limited to the spending of own time and to the
use of equipment and
supplies for own work.
D. Degree 3 - Organizes expert advisory committees to
provide advice to the Branch on
the content of medical device standards.
E. Degree 1 - Complies with administrative procedures,
directives and guidelines
established for the work.
F. Degree 3 - Coordinates the collection of additional
physics information from medical
device manufacturers, health profession users, international
standards-writing
organizations and outside advisory groups.
G. Degree 1 - Follows administrative and safety procedures
established for the work.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Results and decisions of scientific
assessments and projects are used in
the identification of medical device hazards, the development
of regulatory standards, and in the ongoing monitoring and
regulatory compliance control of medical
devices under the Food and Drugs Act.
B. Degree 3 -
(i) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the work
affect the development of technical standards and the
regulatory control of medical devices and may lead to economic or
technological effects on the medical device industry.
|
|
|
Degree
|
(ii) No significant impact.
(iii) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice, and
results of the work result in the
establishment of standards which ensure the continued safety
and efficacy of
medical devices sold in Canada.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - The evaluation and assessment of the physics
data associated with safety
risks, and the development of performance and safety standards
provide knowledge and
improved understanding of the physics of medical devices.
|
|
Linear Organization Chart
Chief, Research and Standards Division Head, Standards and
Testing Section
* - Standards Development Officer, Med. Devices PC-3
(2)
- Test Methods Development Engineer
(EN)
- Standards Development Officer, Med. Devices (BI)
- Standards Development Officer, Med.
Devices (EN)
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 12
|
Level: 3
|
Descriptive Title: Senior Isotopic Analyst, Mass
Spectrometry
|
|
Reporting to the Head, Geochronology Section:
|
|
Plans, organizes, conducts and controls the isotopic
measurement of elemental abundances of uranium, lead, rubidium,
strontium, samarium, neodymium, etc. in geological samples for
determining U-Pb, Rb-Sr, Sm-Nd, etc., and the geological ages and
other related information for the Geochronology Section, a
National Center providing age determinations to the various
Divisions of the Geological Survey of Canada, provincial
geological surveys, academics and other organizations.
Supervises the work of subordinate staff and
the operation of state-of-the-art solid source mass spectrometers
for the measurement of isotopic and elemental abundances in
geological samples and the reduction of the mass spectrometric
data to provide isotopic and elemental abundance of U-Pb, etc.
Maintains quality control over the analytical results, defines
and measures instrumental biases and provides compensatory
corrections to results. Derives algorithms describing the
properties of ion collectors and electrometers and adapts for
precise correction of isotope ratios.
Determines geological ages of rocks and
minerals, discussing age determination projects with field
geologists, and using appropriate methods. Measures the isotopic
composition of common lead, interprets results, develops and use
mathematical models of common lead evolution and prepares
reports, programming and using computer for calculations and
graphics.
Interprets and discusses the results with other scientists and
provides advises on problems and reliability concerning the
isotopic data and their interpretation or to assist in the
feasibility assessment and design of new exploration projects,
and discusses matters of scientific concerns with other
scientists from Canadian and foreign institutions.
Develops new methods of analysis, such as
methods to reduce duration of analysis, develops, designs and
implements new sample handling and measuring equipment to enhance
the sensitivity of mass spectrographs to meet the requirements of
level isotopic analysis, generating new developments and
techniques contributing to advances in the physics of mass
spectrometry and spectrometric analysis to optimize results,
enhance accuracy or solve problems.
Works in conjunction with the analytical
chemist to optimize the methods of chemical purification of
material for mass spectrometric analysis, to specify and
calibrate the concentration of separated isotopic and standard
materials or to deal with problems concerning analytical
preparation of unusual samples or other chemistry related
problems affecting mass spectrometer operation and data.
Schedules and coordinates sample analyses and
use of the equipment; diagnoses equipment malfunctions and ensure
and arranges for required maintenance; assesses obsolescence in
instrumentation; advises superior regarding modifications to
equipment and devises and/or implements the modifications;
supervises, when applicable, the installation of new
spectrometric instrumentation and tests specifications; arranges
for disposal of obsolescent equipment; and, orders uranium and
other isotopic "spikes- and organizes with AECL
disposal of obsolete radioactive material.
Ensures up-keep of required records and files of analytical
results, indexes and statistics of sample analyzed. Compiles and
scientifically edits an annual publication of the Geological
Survey of Canada showing results of geochronology projects;
prepares papers on developments and issues in mass
spectrometry, and writes other related material for
communication and record purposes.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the Section Head in
terms of the requirements
for mass spectrometrics analysis and geological age
determinations required by
geological survey crews for the Geological Survey and Mapping
Programs of Canada, the
Federal-Provincial Mineral Development Program, provincial
geological surveys and
universities concerned.
B. Degree 3 - Work involves comprehensive analytical and
assessment studies for the
isotopic measurement of elemental abundances of various metals
in geological samples
and complex estimations of geological ages and other
information. Accurate age dating
underpins Canada's geological mapping program.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires investigation into a series
of isotopic ratios done by
mass spectrometry on a range of complex geological matrices
using: diverse methods
for determining U-Pb, Rb-Sr, Sm-Nd, etc. and the geological
ages of rocks and
minerals; state-of-the-art solid mass spectrometric equipment,
instruments and
techniques for the isotopic measurement of the elemental
abundances; mathematical
modeling methods to develop models of common lead evolution;
and, various
scientific techniques for designing modifications to equipment
and solving technical
problems. Work also requires the supervision of staff and the
provision of advice.
D. Degree 3 - Plans and organizes the activities of the unit
to provide required and
timely laboratory services, plans and assigns tasks and
schedules equipment use for
the ongoing work and other use demands. Conducts analytical
work and assessment
studies, deals with technical problems, and modifies equipment
and develops new
techniques to meet objectives and quality or enhance precision
of results.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Information and data in terms of the
generation of new developments,
modifications to equipment, new modes of analysis or the
resolution of technical
problems, are obtained through experimentations, tests,
investigations, scientific
literature references and inquiries or consultations with
other scientists and
specialists in various departments and outside institutions.
Geological data and
information for the isotopic measurement of elemental
abundances are obtained from
mass spectrometric analysis of samples, data reduction,
interpretation and previous
analysis, and may require developing new methods.
B. Degree 3 - Information and data can normally be validated
by a combination of
analysis, tests and experimentations using alternative
procedures, internal standards
and cross-referencing with other known rock ages or work of
other mass spectrometry
specialists or scientists in related fields.
C. Degree 3 - Information and data such as on the levels of
various isotopic abundances
vary and are very low, difficult to detect and measure and
require interpretation
which is complicated by the poor understanding of the
geological matrix. Reduction
of data requires defining and measuring instrumental biases,
compensatory
corrections to results and estimation of accuracy and
precision degrees.
D. Degree 3 - Relating data to age of rocks can be difficult
as the physical, chemical
and geological data can be conflicting and require careful
interpretation.
Experimental data derived from changes and development of
modifications involve
variables and relationships which can be conflicting and
necessitate further
investigation.
E. Degree 3 - The work is frequently affected by the
activities and requirements of
geological survey and mapping program geologists, provincial
geological survey
groups, academics and others from organizations engaged in
mining exploration and
development work.
|
|
|
Degree
|
F. Degree 2 - Contacts are with field geologists, other
specialists or scientists for
obtaining information, discussing problems or to provide and
interpret analytical
results and provide advice.
G. Degree 4 - Work requires generating new developments in
mass spectrometric analysis
and techniques for optimizing results and enhancing accuracy
or devising modifications
to equipment to enhance precision and capability or to solve
instrumental or technical
problems. There is a requirement to use novel approaches and
precedents often do not
exist as work and equipment are at a state-of-the-art
level.
H. Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the principles
and theories of the physics of mass spectrometry and the
practices of solid source
mass spectrometry for the isotopic measurement of elemental
abundances in geological
samples and the determination of geological ages of rocks and
minerals, and
familiarity with the practices of geo-chemistry and geological
surveys and with the
use of computer application software.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Work results and conclusions are reviewed by
the Head for soundness of
judgment and by other geologists to ensure work results
contribute to project
objectives and that conclusions about the age of rocks are
compatible with other
evidence.
B. Degree 3 - While no direct guidance is received for
method selection, development,
mass spec. problem solving and contribution to advances in the
physics of mass
spectrometry, guidance is obtained for difficult interferences
and other problems from
other specialists in the field and from geologists and
chemists as applicable.
C. Degree 3 - Work requires defining objectives for
equipment adaptations or
modifications and generation of new developments in mass
spectrometric analysis,
defining rock dating required, resolving instrumental
problems, determining the
approach for dealing with difficult technical problems
associated with particular
rock matrices and the development of methods and techniques to
optimize results.
D. Degree 3 - The work of subordinate staff is reviewed for
correctness of methods
applied, accuracy and precision of results and compliance with
quality control and
safety standards. Work of other scientists is reviewed for
applicability.
E. Degree 3 - Complex mass spectrometry work data,
measurements, compensatory corrections
and accuracy estimate results of subordinate staff are
interpreted to provide
essential age dating. Scientific literature and information
data concerning new
developments in mass spectrometry, and results from
exploration geologists and
scientists in other organizations are evaluated for their
impact on the work.
F. Degree 3 - Specific technical advice is given to Section
Head concerning equipment
modifications and obsolescence and to colleagues, research
scientists and senior staff
on problems and reliability of isotopic data and
interpretation, the age data
obtained, its precision and relevance to the project. Advice
is also given to
chemists, geologists and mass spectrometrists on sampling,
sample handling and
preparation.
|
|
Management Responsibilities
|
3
|
A. Degree 2 - Supervises the work of a technologist engaged
in mass spectrometry work.
B. Degree 3 - Controls the use and maintenance of the mass
spectrometers and attendant
equipment allocated for the work, and sets operational
guidelines for their use.
C. Degree 3 - Recommends the acquisition of new mass
spectrometry equipment and
instrumentation and writes required specifications for the
equipment and its
up-keen.
|
|
|
Degree
|
D. Degree 2 - Recommends on the need and arranges for
required equipment servicing and
repairs. Other assistance, when required, is requested from
the Section Head.
E. Degree 3 - Implements precision and safety standards for
required quality of results,
safe operation of the equipment and disposal of radioactive
material.
F. Degree 3 - Coordinates mass spectrometry survey work
schedule with others in the
Section and the requirements of various geological survey
groups, other geologists
with Mineral Development Program and others from outside to
ensure results are timed
for required efficiency and that work by others using the
equipment does not
interfere with internal schedule.
G. Degree 2 - Implements laboratory, safety and
administrative procedures established
for the work.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Results of the work i.e., accurate geological
age dating underpins the
entire geological mapping program and affects the government
field exploration
program, geological survey and mineral development work.
B. Degree 3 -
(i) Degree 2 - Results of the work can have an economic or
technological effect on
mining explorations and industrial mineral development
process.
(ii) Degree 3 - Results of the work have an effect on the
knowledge and status of the
geology of Canada and hence impact the potential uses and
status of the mineral
resources. Advice influences the course of exploration and
affects the
feasibility assessment of mineral developments and the future
of Canadian mining
resources.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No other significant impact.
C. Degree 3 - Development of new techniques for
mass-spectrometric analysis and advances
in the physics of mass spectrometry contribute to the
knowledge of that discipline,
while interpretation of complex data provide new knowledge and
improved understanding
of the age of rocks and thus the geology of Canada.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director, Precambrian Geology Division
Head, Geochronology Section
- Research Scientists
- Electronic Technologist (EL)
- Argon Extraction Technician (EG)
- Research Scientist
* - Senior Isotopic Analyst Mass Spectrometry PC-3
- Isotope Technologist (EG)
- Isotope Analyst PC-1
- Isotope Chemist (CH-3)
- Assistant Geochronologist PC-1
- Chemical Technologists (EG)
- Chemical Technologists (EG)
- Chemical Technician (EG)
* Bench-mark Position.
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 13
|
Level: 3
|
Descriptive Title: Physical Oceanographer
|
|
|
|
Reporting to the Head, Ocean Circulation Division:
|
|
Organizes and carries out physical
oceanographic studies to determine the motion and mixing
processes of the sea. Plans and determines likely approaches to
be used for collecting data such as temperature, density,
currents and salinity, and directs support staff in the use of
this data to produce current fields, charts and atlases. Develops
hypothesis of physical oceanographic processes, using the data
collected and evaluated and integrating this with work from other
disciplines.
Acts as chief scientist and program organizer
during voyages to gather oceanographic data. Coordinates the work
of scientific staff in cooperation with the ship's captain.
Allocates resources like cruise time and equipment to the
individual scientists. Modifies plans to meet weather,
navigational and time limitations. Advises other scientists so
that the crew's time is used to the best advantage.
Evaluates new techniques and equipment such as
satellite-tracked drifting buoys used in physical oceanography.
Advises on the design of new equipment. Identifies, evaluates and
recommends the acquisition and deployment of new equipment, and
analyses the data collected for reporting to the scientific
community.
Provides advice to senior laboratory staff, the
scientific community and others on the data, equipment, results
and theories used in physical oceanography.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Objectives are set by the Head, Ocean
Circulation Division in terms of
departmental project goals for physical oceanography studies
or in terms of
objectives for a specific cruise, incorporating the projects
of other scientists.
B. Degree 3 - Work involves comprehensive studies to
determine the motions and mixing
processes of the seas, and acting as chief scientist on
oceanographic voyages,
planning, conducting and coordinating surveys.
C. Degree 3 - Activities include using a variety of
scientific techniques to measure
the physical parameters of the ocean, including the
development and evaluation of
new techniques and equipment, and coordinating the work of
multi disciplined
scientific staff.
D. Degree 4 - Work involves planning, organizing and
coordinating the work of many
scientists on a variety of interdisciplinary problems within
the constraints imposed
by an oceanographic cruise, and simultaneously organizing and
conducting physical
oceanographic studies to achieve departmental goals.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Data are normally difficult to obtain and
frequently involve field trips
under rigorous conditions. Methods are modeled on past
practice but often have to
be adapted to meet current conditions. New, innovative
techniques are used to
measure the physical characteristics of the ocean. Data must
be interpreted and
evaluated carefully to ensure the validity of the work.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 3 - Data is normally validated by comparing the
easier-to-obtain monitoring
results or by difficult and expensive ground proofing.
C. Degree 4 - The size and changeability of the ocean make it
difficult to interpret
the multi-faceted, highly variable and oft-time ambiguous data
required for the
development of hypothesis for oceanic water movements.
D. Degree 3 - Relationships amongst oceanic parameters are
complex and difficult to
define and require field work for proper interpretation.
E. Degree 3 - Project activity coordination, priorities and
scheduling of the work are
frequently affected by the activities of others. Major
projects normally have to be
coordinated with international and national groups. Ocean
cruises involve
individuals outside the Canadian government, and some from
outside Canada.
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists from Canadian
and foreign universities and
research institutes and other government agencies to
participate in cooperative
projects, resolve scientific and scheduling difficulties, and
exchange information
that will lead to the resolution of oceanographic
questions.
G. Degree 3 - The work requires developing new procedures
and equipment for
oceanographic study and modifying the existing techniques to
obtain higher quality
data.
H. Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the
principals of theories and practices of oceanography and a
familiarity with
fisheries, environmental and biological research and some
knowledge of electronic
data gathering equipment and computer data processing
systems.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Work is reviewed by the Head for soundness of
judgment and to ensure
that the objectives of in house projects have been met, and
that the oceanographic
research has been managed in a judicious and efficient
manner.
B. Degree 3 - Professional guidance is only received for
the resolution of difficult
technical problems or complex resource allocations.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires identifying problems,
designing approaches and
organizing physical oceanographic studies to define the mass
movement of water and
deal with the coordination of multidisciplinary scientific
research during ocean
voyages.
D. Degree 3 - The work of subordinate staff and project
team members is reviewed to
ensure it meets with the guidelines set for the project. The
work of national and
international scientists is reviewed to ensure proper
coordination with own work.
E. Degree 3 - Scientific data from oceanographic studies,
both inside and outside the
organizational unit, are interpreted to develop and modify new
hypotheses about the
movement of water masses in the ocean and to provide guidance
for the development of
new projects.
F. Degree 3 - Represents Canada as a scientific adviser on
international committees,
provides advice to senior staff and colleagues on physical
oceanography.
|
|
Management Responsibilities
|
3
|
A. Degree 2 - Work requires the supervision of a support
staff comprised of a varying
number of technicians.
B. Degree 3 - Controls the use and maintenance of allocated
equipment both within the
organizational unit and on board ship during ocean
voyages.
|
|
|
Degree
|
C. Degree 3 - Evaluates and recommends the acquisition of
satellite-tracked drifting
buoys and similar new designs of equipment to enhance the
division's research data
collection capability.
D. Degree 3 - Determines the precise requirements for
contracted research and arranges
for the selection of suitable research institutions.
E. Degree 3 - Ensures the quality of the work by comparing
collected data with the
results of other work. Ensures that safety procedures are
followed, particularly
during ocean voyages.
F. Degree 3 - Coordinates research activities with scientists
from other institutions
to ensure scientific approaches are current, and coordinates
cruise activities.
G. Degree 3 - Interprets and implements guidelines and
directives issued by the Head.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the work
effect the continuing
monitoring operation to collect oceanographic data, and
influence the development
and conduct of physical oceanographic projects as well as
those of other scientists
involved in related research.
B. Degree 3 -
(i) Degree 2 - Information and results of the work have an
economic impact on
commercial fishing, and other ocean users.
(ii) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the
work affect the state of
knowledge of the oceanographic environment and the resultant
management
practices, and affect the use of the ocean by shipping,
fishing industrial and
conservation interests.
(iii) No significant impact.
_(iv) No other significant impact.
C. Degree 3 - The development of new methods, procedures,
and hypotheses which are
interpreted and published provide new knowledge and improved
understanding of
physical oceanography.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director, Physical and Chemical Sciences
(Bedford Institute of Oceanography)
Head, Ocean Circulation Division - Clerical staff
* - Physical Oceanographers (3) PC-3
- Technicians (up to 6)
- Head, Software Systems
- Oceanographic Applications Programmer
- Senior Oceanographic Development
Technicians
- Senior Oceanographic Field
Technicians
- Senior Oceanographic Data Technicians
- Assistant Oceanographic Data
Technicians
* Bench-mark position.
BENCH MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 14
|
Level: 3
|
Descriptive Title: Explosives Scientist, Explosive
Authorization and Hazards Analysis Section
|
|
|
|
Reporting to the Manager, Canadian Explosives Research
Laboratory:
|
|
Tests and evaluates the hazards and suitability
of explosives for properties such as explosive force, projective
impact and mechanical sensitivity, to be authorized under the
Canada Explosives Act. Provides technical advice to the Chief
Inspector of Explosives, various government departments and
industry on the suitability and nature of explosives and the
construction standards for transportation of explosives.
Supervises the activities of the Section,
determining methods and extent of testing of explosives submitted
for authorization, discussing and establishing priorities,
scheduling and assigning work, ensuring observance of safety
precautions and providing instructions and guidance to staff,
checking correctness of techniques and procedures applied and
accuracy of results. Reports on work progress for the Section and
on staff performance, and makes recommendations.
Carries out laboratory analytical
investigations in cases such as where unusual behavior patterns
in explosives has been revealed by the testing and reports
unusual reactions uncovered during investigations for inclusion
in the recommendation for authorization.
Prepares reports on test and evaluation results
and formulates recommendations to the manager on the suitability
of explosives to be authorized by the Laboratory.
Provides scientific support or authoritative
advice to investigators from the Explosives Branch, Transport
Canada, Police Forces, and from industry and to prosecuting
attorneys or Counsels in the determination of the causes of
accidental explosions, studying and discussing investigator's
report, determining extent of Section involvement in consultation
with the manager and the testing techniques to be used,
conducting required study and testing work, verifying laboratory
results through field testing, underground trials, explosion
simulation and performance tests on explosives using various
machines, instruments and material for determining likely causes
of explosion, gathering evidence for testimony before a court of
law and for presenting professional opinion, advice and
recommendations to prevent re-occurrence.
Discusses new developments in explosives technology with
officials and scientists from industry and governments and other
scientists within the department and identifies, investigates and
recommends suitable projects to manager for developing new or
enhancing existing techniques and procedures to evaluate or
elucidate hazards associated with explosives such as posed by
propellants, fire works, etc.
Conducts studies and develops standards for
explosives such as fireworks standards for the Explosives Branch
and other organizations; conducts and assigns to staff required
technique and procedures development work, devising and
discussing modifications to existing laboratory equipment or
specifies new equipment requirements to assist in testing and for
reviewing results; and, prepares reports and recommendations for
adoption or for information to concerned groups in own
department, laboratories of other governments and the explosives
industry.
Determine, in consultation with the manager, if
request for technical advice concerning particular explosives,
industrial materials or construction standards for transportation
of explosives falls within the mandate of the Explosives
Authorization and Hazards Analysis Section, the regulation or
provisions of the Canada Explosive Act.
Provides consulting services to other government departments,
outside agencies, industry and universities on the nature of
explosives material through investigations or analysis, and
supplies information on the analytical techniques used or
developed by the Section.
Writes special reports on tests, findings and quality of
results, problems, techniques and procedures used or developed
for the technical investigations and evaluations carried out in
the Section for management information or for information to
other departments or outside agencies or groups such as the UN
Group of Expert on Explosives, industry and universities for
standardization or advice.
Degree
Specifications
Kinds of
Assignments
3
A. Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the manager, in
terms of the scientific testing and evaluation of the hazards and
properties of explosives to determine their suitability for
authorization under the Canada Explosives Act, and in terms of
study and standards development goal or extent and type of
scientific investigation support or advice to be provided.
B. Degree 3 - The work involves comprehensive testing and
evaluation to determine the suitability of explosives for
authorization and to provide scientific support in the gathering
of evidence for determining causes of explosives accidents, and
presenting professional opinion, advice and recommendation to
prevent re-occurrence.
C. Degree 2 - The activities consist of a variety of tasks
such as analyzing and investigating explosives and explosives
accidents, developing new techniques, providing advice and expert
testimony, and supervising the support staff.
D. Degree 3 - The work requires planning, conducting and
assigning work to test and evaluate the characteristics of
explosives and similar hazardous materials to determine their
suitability as explosives under the Canada Explosives Act, and
ensuring that set objectives are met.
Complexity of
Work
3
A. Degree 3 - The work requires obtaining the
characteristics of explosives by a variety of testing techniques
or explosion simulation, often involving method adaptation which
may require extensive and difficult interpretation, especially in
legal dispute cases. Sources may be identified from past practice
or involve difficulties when supplied data are incomplete to
support evaluated performance of explosives.
B. Degree 3 - Information and data can normally be validated
by investigation and literature referencing or through the
eventual unique simulation of an accidental explosion. Supplied
data are frequently incomplete and there are conflicts with the
performance of explosives submitted and supporting data
provided.
C. Degree 3 - Information and data pertaining to properties
and hazards of explosives are characterized by several parameters
or variables that require careful interpretation of any
ambiguities, especially when legal action and different sets of
data are involved.
D. Degree 3 - Investigating the relationships and the
divergent characteristics associated with explosives and an
explosion, especially an accidental explosion, requires
investigation and careful interpretation of the data before
presenting a professional opinion.
E. Degree 3 - The work is frequently affected by the
activities of inspectors, scientists and officials from own and
other government departments and private industry involved in
explosives, and investigators from Transport Canada and police
departments.
|
Degree
|
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists and officials
from other government
departments, industry, and police departments to exchange
information, provide advice
and resolve problems associated with evaluation results, the
applicable standards
and the routine use or incidents involving explosives.
G. Degree 3 - Work requires developing new techniques for
evaluating hazards associated
with explosives, adapting procedures for the investigation of
planned events from
existing methods.
H. Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the physical
and chemical properties, manufacture and use of explosives,
and of the principles,
theories and practices of physics as it relates to testing and
use of explosives,
and familiarity with the standards and the law as it applies
to explosives use.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Work approaches, test and evaluation results,
recommendations and
conclusions and progress reports on the work of the section
are reviewed by the
Manager for soundness of judgment and in terms of the
attainment of the section's
objectives and the provisions of Canada Explosives Act.
B. Degree 3 - The work requires the resolution of technical
problems associated with the
testing and hazard evaluation of explosives, with minimal
guidance. Scientific or
professional guidance is available from Manager and other
scientists in the resolution
of difficult testing method development, explosion simulation,
or to determine extent
of laboratory involvement in investigation of accidental
explosions.
C. Degree 3 - The work requires determining methods and
extent of testing for the
evaluation of explosives and for the investigation of
accidental explosions,
identifying problems and determining approaches for their
resolution.
D. Degree 3 - The work of support staff is reviewed and
checked for accuracy. Results
and findings of other explosives scientists from industry and
government are reviewed
for applicability and suitable projects to be recommended to
the Manager, such as to
elucidate the hazards posed by explosives, propellants and
fireworks.
E. Degree 3 - Complex scientific data, results and
conclusions of other explosives
scientists and subordinate staff are interpreted for
implication on the work or the
determination of the cause of accidental explosions or
assessment of new techniques
for evaluating hazards.
F. Degree 4 - Advice based on a recognized expertise within
the specialized subject
area of the testing and use of explosives is provided to other
scientists, senior
staff, attorneys and other officials both inside and outside
the government.
|
|
Management Responsibilities
|
3
|
A. Degree 2 - The work requires the supervision of a
technical support staff of four
technicians.
B. Degree 3 - The work requires the control, the use and
maintenance of physical and
chemical testing equipment and the proper use of the
facilities of the Canadian
Explosives Research Laboratory allocated for the work.
C. Degree 3 - Evaluates requirements, prepares
specifications and evaluation criteria
for, and recommends acquisition of laboratory equipment and
facilities to the
manager.
D. Degree 3 - Substantiates the need for, writes statements
of work, and identifies
suitable sources of scientific assistance for particular
research work. Acts as
scientific authority.
|
|
|
Degree
|
E. Degree 3 - Implements quality assurance procedures and
develops and implements
safety procedures to meet the laboratory's objectives.
F. Degree 3 - Coordinates the testing and hazard evaluation
of explosives and the
investigation scientific support work required with others in
federal, provincial
agencies (including the police) and industry.
G. Degree 3 - Interprets and implements special safety
directives and procedures
developed for the work. Implements straight forward
administrative procedures.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the
work affect the continuing
operation of the Explosives Authorization and Hazards Analysis
section and impact on
the development and conduct of projects, both inside the
government and in industry,
and influence the outcome of investigations into accidental
explosions.
B. Degree 3 -
(i) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the work
have economic or
technological effects on the producers and users of explosive
products.
(ii) No significant impact.
(iii) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and
results of the work affect the approval
and use of explosives, propellants and fireworks with regard
to safety and
regulatory control.
(iv) Degree 3 - While results contribute to the
process of law as it relates to the
accidental and deliberate misuse of explosives, the work of
the position
impacts on occupational safety. Recommendations, advice and
results affect the
use of explosive in the workplace.
C. Degree 3 - Development of new methods and procedures and
the investigation, analysis
and interpretation of information involved in the examination
of explosives
materials provide new knowledge and improved
understanding.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director, Mining Research Laboratory
- Manager, Canadian Explosives Atmospheres Laboratory
- Manager, Canadian Explosives Research Laboratory
- Explosives Research Section (SE-RES; CH)
- Explosives Application and Methodology Section (PC; EG;
EL)
* - Explosives Scientist, Explosives Authorization and
Hazards Analysis
Section PC-3
- Technical Support Staff (4) (EC's)
- Clerical Staff
* Bench Mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 15
|
Level: 3
|
Descriptive Title: Senior Physical Scientist and Risk
Analyst
|
|
|
|
Reporting to the Manager, Environmental/Impact Assessment
Program
|
|
Identifies, investigates and assesses problems related to
environmental issues pertaining to the protection of air, land
and water and to effects of developments on the conservation and
utilization of these resources in the Pacific and Yukon region
inherent to geographic sitting of industrial installations,
routing or sitting of linear transportation or tans-shipment
facilities, impact of mishaps involving contaminant substances or
dangerous goods and to issues leading to conflicts in resource
utilization between/among users.
Plans scientific assessments of proposals for
industrial and resources development projects and the geographic
sitting for major installations or facilities, trans-shipment
activities or linear transportation routing with potential
environmental quality implications for air, land or water
resources and the rational utilization of these resources in the
region. Solicits task force participation for assessments or
studies involving various departments and government levels,
other agencies, universities and public interest groups to assess
impact of major projects proposals (e.g. Western Liquefied
Natural Gas; West Coast Transmission Amonia Proposal.)
Determines approaches, develops proposals and
organizes and conducts or leads and coordinates
multi-disciplinary scientific investigation and evaluation
studies and inter-agencies assessment and survey activities to
prevent, mitigate or resolve multi-disciplinary problems related
to the protection/prevention/utilization of land, air and water
resources.. Develops proposals concerning Department's position
in terms of program and policy objectives for the quality,
protection, conservation or utilization of those resources in the
region, the resolution of related conflicts and the
implementation of measures or enhancement of guidelines,
policies, strategies or priorities to meet objectives.
Defines sitting problems, develops, recommends
and applies terms of reference and geographic sitting analysis
systems, and proposal evaluation protocols or procedures and
techniques through involvement of specialists engaged in
comprehensive sitting and routing studies and transport of
dangerous goods. Initiates and conducts studies to identify and
propose new areas of endeavors, guidelines and environmental
protection and damage mitigation, or to develop, recommend and
implement scientific procedures or guidelines for geographic site
selection, zoning and planning, enhanced environmental and public
safety standards or practices, and air, land and water
preservation measures for facilities to be located on Crown's and
agencies' lands and waters.
Identifies and researches topics and major
study requirements and proposes tasks for assignments to other
scientists. Researches, reviews and studies new developments and
maintains liaisons with other specialists involved in development
and application of risk analysis, mathematical modeling
techniques and related computer applications for applicability in
such task as the assessment of offshore exploration oil spill
probabilities, or to ascertain opportunities for an
interdisciplinary modeling approach such as for oil and chemicals
spill dispersion modeling or to address conflicts in land, air
and water uses.
Develops models or leads and coordinates risk
analysis assessment and modeling project activities and
application of computer modeling techniques, such as to evaluate
alternative transport corridors, assess risk, portray air
dispersion process, resolve resources related conflicts, analyze
management
strategy issues or determine
inter-relationships of variables. Researches historical results
of pollution control measures in the region, indicators and
trends, formulate concepts for trend analysis,
and prepare summary publication.
Analyzes and consolidates multi-disciplinary
inputs and study results into final report, (e.g. the Ocelot
Methanol plant; the Kitimat Oil Terminal) presents findings to
senior management and conducts briefing sessions. Prepares and
presents briefs to committees and hearing panels, and represents
the Department at public hearings, interveners and public
interest group meetings. Contributes proposals to task forces or
scientific committees concerning regional programs and priorities
or for intervention in, and participates at Project Certification
Hearings and explains study findings and conclusions. Acts as
program representative on regional committees for environmental
protection, resource conservation and utilization, marine
traffic, trans-shipment activities, linear transportation,
contaminants and hazardous substances, and provides authoritative
advice on matters relevant to the field of expertise.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Objectives are specified by the Manager in
terms of particular project
goals and program requirements. Particular objectives or
projects terms of
references stem from discussions of study, proposal evaluation
and assessment work.
B. Degree 4 - The work involves comprehensive studies and
investigations to identify
and define multi-disciplinary problems pertaining to the
protection and use of air
water and land resources in the region; the prevention or
mitigation of environmental
damage; detailed evaluations of proposals on geographic
sitting of installations and
environmental risks analysis and assessment for acceptability
and certification;
investigations into potential conflicts between users;
research studies into risks
analysis and modeling methods and applications; the
presentation of proposals and
briefs, and the provision of authoritative advice.
C. Degree 3 - The work includes the conduct of
multi-disciplinary studies,
investigation and evaluation projects into the identification
and definition of
environmental problems pertaining to the quality, preservation
and use of air, land
and water resources and the mitigation of contaminant damages;
the scientific evaluation of geographic sitting proposals
for major installations; pollution trends and environmental risk
analysis and impact assessment, simulation modeling and
adaptation of techniques; the allocation and coordination of
project activities; the preparation of total study reports; and,
the provision of scientific advice.
D. Degree 3 - Initiates, plans, organizes and performs or
assigns tasks and leads multi
disciplinary projects or scientific investigational studies
into problems definition,
proposals evaluation and resources utilization conflicts, and
the preservation of
air, land and water as a resource or a medium, and into
environmental risks analysis,
impact assessments and method applications development, to
ensure program objectives
are met within guidelines and participation constraints of
other organizations'
staff.
|
|
|
Degree/
Points
|
Complexity of Work
|
|
A. Degree 3 - Multi-disciplinary information and data must
be obtained on the physical
characteristics and the temporal and spatial specifics of
geographic sites,
installations, substances, process technology or operations,
state and
particularities of air, land and water resources, their
preservation, development
and utilization requirements. Information in sitting proposals
is often incomplete
and that from other studies or sources can be remotely
relevant or difficult to
obtain. Interpretation, comparison, selection and further
investigations are
required.
|
4
|
|
Degree/
Poi nts
|
B. Degree 3 - Information and data available from various
sources are often incomplete
and those supplied by the proponent and other interest groups
often are incomplete,
biased or subjective. Generally the information can be
validated or confirmed by a
combination of further investigations, comparisons and
detailed studies or
scientific literature referencing and interpretation.
C. Degree 3 - Information and data used to evaluate
sitting/routing proposals for
acceptability or used in risk analysis and assessment and in
modeling impact of
mishaps and mitigative measures or to develop trends in state
of resources pollution
and effectiveness of measures, are characterized by several
variables, temporal and
spatial factors, poorly defined variability, ambiguity and
require interpretation
and consultations.
D. Degree 4 - Relationships between the multi-disciplinary
variables affecting the
acceptability of routing/sitting proposals or involved in
resources utilization
conflicts, risk analysis, mishap impact assessment and
mitigation of environmental
damage, or in identification of indicators and deterioration
trends are complicated
and require multi-disciplinary investigation to deal with
conflicts and
interpretation problems.
E. Degree 4 - The work, inter-agency projects or
multi-disciplinary evaluation studies
and the preparation of total study report are affected by the
nature, extent and
objectives of the contribution of other scientists or
representatives of own and
other organizations, agencies of other levels of government
involved, proponent
industries and public interest groups and implication on work
must be considered.
F. Degree 4 - Contacts are with scientists of own
departments and outside agencies to
solicit participation, investigate problems, discuss results
and formulate recommendations; with officials and scientists
of proponent industries to discuss findings;
with the public and interest groups to exchange information;
and, with officials of
public hearing boards or panels to explain findings and
conclusions and provide
authoritative advice.
G. Degree 3 - The work requires developing new application
systems and techniques for
scientific evaluation of geographic sitting proposals, risk
analysis and assessment,
modeling of environmental impacts, trends projection or
modeling of effects of
mishaps on the resources and effectiveness of mitigative
measures.
H. Degree 4 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of physical
geography including the principles, theories and practices of
those fields of physics
pertinent to the required application of physics principles to
biological, chemical
and geological environmental systems, complemented by a
knowledge of other work
related earth sciences disciplines (e.g. geology, hydrology,
physical oceanography,
climatology, ecology) and some familiarity with practices of
chemistry and biology
pertinent to the work, and practices of engineering of large
projects (e.g. pipelines,
port facilities and chemical plants) is also necessary. A
thorough knowledge of the
use of risk assessment, computer modeling and statistical
analysis applied in the
disciplines must also be applied.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
4
|
A. Degree 3 - Approach to conducting sitting or routing
proposal evaluation or
investigation of user conflicts, and study conclusions, briefs
and recommendations are
discussed with other scientists and reviewed by the Manager
and Branch Director for
thoroughness, soundness of judgment and consistency with
program objectives.
|
|
|
Degree/
Points
|
B. Degree 3 - Professional guidance is received on the
resolution of particularly
difficult problems involving highly sensitive issues, program
goals and multi
jurisdictions or difficult resources utilization conflicts
among major users.
Advice can be obtained from specialists in developing
indicators and trend analysis
concepts, difficult risk analysis, modeling and specialized
computer applications.
C. Degree 3 - The work involves a requirement to define
multi-disciplinary project terms
of references and to identify and determine approaches to
resolve evaluation/
assessment and investigation problems, conflicts among
resources users, difficulties
due to absence or incomplete data and conflicting, subjective
or biased information
and conclusions to determine acceptability of proposals and to
identify potential
topics and objectives for new studies and methodologies,
develop proposals and
evaluation protocols and guidelines for preventing or
mitigating environmental impact
of mishaps on resources quality and the population.
D. Degree 4 - Within multi-disciplinary subject area, the
results, findings and
conclusions of other scientists and task force or team members
are reviewed for
validity and appropriateness in assessing acceptability of
proposals, conformance to
program objectives or effectiveness in resolution of resources
related conflicts.
New developments by other scientists/specialists in the study
of geographic site,
evaluation of installations sitting proposals, risk analysis
and environmental impact
determination, prevision, modeling and prevention/mitigation
of mishap effects are
reviewed and assessed for applicability.
E. Degree 4 - Results of studies or conclusions and
recommendations by scientists of
diverse organizations, task force or team members and own
study/investigation and
analysis results are interpreted to determine their
significance, completeness, and
their meaning and implications on the acceptability of
sitting/routing proposals or
alternatives, and on the applicability and effectiveness of
proposed measures,
guidelines and protocols.
F. Degree 4 - Advice based on recognized expertise in
geographic sitting/routing and
assessment of environmental impact and acceptability of
proposals, the state, and
preservation requirements of, and risks to, air/land/water
quality and mitigation of
environmental impact of mishaps associated with resources
development or utilization, is provided to senior
management, officials and scientists of the department,
other agencies, industry and members of boards or panels.
|
|
Management Responsibility
|
2
|
A. Degree 1 - As applicable, assigns tasks and provides
advice and instructions to
project team or task force members and to non-subordinate
support staff.
B. Degree 1 - Usually limited to planning the use of
equipment and supplies for own
work.
C. Degree 3 - Specifies terms of reference and recommends
and provides expertise on
consultant contracts. Recommends the acquisition of computer
equipment and
specialized application software to meet work objectives and
requirements.
D. Degree 3 - Substantiates the need and arranges for
consultant services and
contractor work in the field. Defines requirements, solicits
and arranges for the
participation by other organizations within and outside own
department, including of
other levels of government and private sector
organizations.
E. Degree 2 - Ensures that contract work meets specified
requirements as to quality,
quantity and timeliness and other standards pertaining to own
responsibilities.
|
|
|
Degree/
Points
|
F. Degree 3 - Coordinates work of project team members and
other activities related to
multi-disciplinary or multi-jurisdictional assessments and
scientific evaluations or
studies involving other scientists, professionals or staff
members of various
organizations. Coordinates own activities with those of others
in data gathering,
compilation of results and preparation and presentation of
total study report.
G. Degree 1 - Follows office and field administrative and
safety procedures established
for the work.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
|
3
|
A. Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the
work affect resource management
practices and the formulations of air, land and water
resources protection measures,
guidelines and regulation, the orientation and conduct of the
program studies in the
Region and the formulation of proposals for policy and program
objectives and priority.
B. Degree 3 -
(i) Degree 3 - Recommendations and advice on geographic
sitting or routing have
economic and technological effects on industrial installations
or linear
transport system facilities and operations.
(ii) Degree 3 - Recommendations and advice affect the state of
air, land and water
resources.
(iii) Degree 3 - Recommendations and advice
affect the safety regulatory controls of
contaminating processes and practices, the routing of
potentially hazardous
products or substances and the mitigation effects of mishaps
to the public.
(iv) No significant impact.
C. Degree 3 - Information and results of the work contribute
greater knowledge of
geographic sites, industrial sitting and effects on particular
environment of industrial processes and tans-shipment
routings. Work also contributes new or enhanced
knowledge of pollution trends and methodologies and techniques
in risk analysis and
modeling of impact.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
- Regional Director, Environmental Protection, Pacific and
Yukon
- Director, Contaminants and Assessment Branch
- Environment Emergency Coordinator,
CEPA Sr. Investigator
- Manager, Environmental Impact Assessment Program
* - Senior Physical Scientist and Risk Analyst PC-3
- Environmental Assessment Officer PC-2 Coordinator, Federal
Referrals &
FREMP Project Review Process (EN-ENG-04)
- Environmental Assessment Registrar (CR-04)
- Referral Clerk (CR-03)
* Bench-mark position.
BENCH-MARK POSITION
DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 16
|
Level: 4
|
Descriptive Title: Senior Officer/Advisor, Physical
Oceanography
|
|
Reporting to the Assistant Director and Chief, National
Programs Division:
|
|
Analyses, interprets and assesses the impact of
national and international developments and proposals for coastal
development and offshore activities (e.g. resources exploration,
transportation, power generation and harbor facilities) with
respect to physical aspects of the marine environment i.e. waves,
currents, subsurface temperature, sea ice movement, etc., and the
relationship of these variables to the use of the ocean for a
wide range of clients and purposes (e.g. marine transportation,
offshore oil and gas exploration and development, fisheries,
defense, tourism and recreation) and to develop, recommend or
advise on departmental position or policies, strategies and
programs pertaining to the management and protection of the
marine environment.
Establishes priorities and long-term plans for
oceanographic research to provide an understanding of the
physical characteristics of the ocean, in terms of circulation,
density, heat content and gaseous absorption, etc. such that
predictive models can be developed to show the effect of the
ocean on heat distribution within the global and regional
climate, the movement of CO and other green-house gases by
absorption, chemical and biological reactions and their mass
transfer by ocean currents; the movement and effects of ice on
marine operations; the forecasting of marine environmental
conditions and the potential trajectories and dispersion of
spills such as oil, through the ocean and to land. Ensures such
research will also meet the needs of other engineering and
science disciplines such as chemistry and biology, and that the
programs are properly integrated. Identifies areas of conflicts
concerning policies between departments and service within the
Department, and recommends methods for resolution. Evaluates
research programs and their effects on national and international
initiatives for their impact on the management of the marine
environment and recommends changes.
Maintains close liaison with marine operators
and senior research scientists, acting as departmental
representative on committees concerning energy in the marine
environment, ocean services and real-time oceanography, ecology,
weather and climate, and hydro-acoustics.
Assesses and reviews other policies and
programs that have socioeconomic, transportation, industrial,
environmental, safety, foreign affairs and other impacts on the
marine environment. Drafts proposals to establish the
departmental position on these issues. Ensures that policies of
other bodies are compatible with departmental policies. Ensures
effective transfer of scientific and technical information
between the affected groups. Coordinates and maintains
cooperation and liaison between the Service and
environmental agencies and industrial groups concerned with
the effects of resource exploration, transportation, power
generation and the use of port facilities in the marine
environment.
Advises senior management on the scientific
aspects of marine policies. Proposes programs to provide
scientific input and negotiates agreements for interdepartmental
issues. Develops work plans and directs working groups to study
and deal with specific issues such as pertaining to new demands
for scientific information, special policy program strategy
studies or follow-up action to national and international
commitments. Provides advice and policy papers to the senior
department officials.
Assists in drafting legislation and government
policy responses and arranges bilateral scientific exchanges.
Assesses national and international developments in marine
affairs. Formulates amendments proposals to statutes and
regulations covering the marine environment in consultation with
legal advisors and others in departments or agencies concerned
and involving briefing and discussions with political and
diplomatic representatives, scientists and other foreign
government officials, concerning international implications and
national positions.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Objectives are set by the Asst.
Director/Chief in terms of the research
studies, development impact assessments and scientific advice
required in support to
the achievement of departmental objectives for efficient
policies, strategies and
programs pertaining to the management and protection of the
marine environment.
B_. Degree 4 - The work is specifically related to the
development of policy for the
marine environment and involves establishing a number of
complex research projects
which, while principally dealing with the physical attributes
of the ocean, also
encompass several other scientific and engineering
disciplines.
C. Degree 4 - The work involves establishing priorities and
plans and organizing marine
research projects, coordinating the work of others in research
in the marine and
commercial sectors and users of the information generated,
obtaining cooperation
between groups involved in resources exploration,
transportation, power generation
and use of port facilities, providing advice and developing
policy, evaluating
national and international programs and ensuring that the
needs of other scientific
groups are met.
D. Degree 4 - High degree of freedom and latitude for
planning, organizing and
coordinating complex research studies including negotiating
with other federal
agencies to ensure compatibility with Service and Departmental
policies and for
coordinating, maintaining liaison and cooperation between
groups involved in
resource exploration and use of facilities or in arranging
required bilateral
scientific exchanges.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Data pertaining to marine environment and
activities are widely different
and are drawn from hard to access sources such as foreign
governments, or are
generated by intricate investigations in a harsh environment
and their use, such as
for developing predictive models and policies involves
difficult interpretation and
selection.
B. Degree 4 - Information and data are often difficult to
validate as they comes from
divergent sources that are difficult to access or for which
the original data bank
is not available or would require expensive and laborious
repetitions of research
study and investigation work.
C. Degree 4 - Data represent a complex set of variables,
often of unknown precision and
sometimes only as estimates, that must be reviewed from a
broad global perspective;
difficult interpretations are involved and data have to be
integrated with data from
other disciplines. Careful judgment must be exercised in the
use of the data.
D. Degree 4 - Relationships amongst the variables
themselves are complex and must also
be related to other sciences, socioeconomic, transportation,
environmental and
foreign affairs perspectives and require long-term, detailed
investigations to
identify and resolve conflicts and interpretation problems,
and to develop a clear
understanding of the role and influence of each parameter on
changes in the marine
environment.
E. Degree 4 - Work is affected by the activities of
industry, other departments, other
Canadian and foreign governments or national and international
scientific bodies,
and requires consideration and often negotiations, to assess
or modify their impact
on the work.
F. Degree 4 - Contacts are interdepartmental to negotiate
terms of agreements and
develop programs; with scientists to plan and conduct joint
investigations; and,
with other governmental agencies, scientists and officials of
industry to provide
advice based on a recognized expertise in the area.
|
|
|
Degree
|
G. Degree 4 - The work requires developing new approaches to
research designed to
provide an understanding of the complex functions and
relations of the ocean, an
area which is poorly understood. Work also requires using
innovative methods to
integrate all the various inputs in developing new policy or
ensuring the existence
of policy and research activities which can contribute to meet
the objectives of the
Department.
H. Degree 4 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of physical
oceanography and related marine sciences complemented by an
understanding of
related theories, methods and practices of chemistry, ecology,
biology, geology,
coastal engineering and of marine and atmospheric pollution,
and environment
protection. A knowledge of legal and political implications of
marine policy is
also applied.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
5
|
A. Degree 4 - Key recommendations and conclusions are
reviewed as they affect policy
and the overall attainment of objectives but advice is
normally taken as
authoritative.
B. Degree 5 - Guidance is received from the supervisor and
other senior management on
policy intent and issues which are difficult or involve
conflicts. Professional
guidance may be obtained from other scientific
authorities.
C. Degree 4 - The work requires developing objectives for
the research and ensuring
integration with other disciplines; establishing priorities
and long-term plans for
oceanographic research studies within the department;
coordinating work with various
other groups; and, indicating likely solutions to resolve
unusual and complex
problems pertaining to the areas of the work.
D. Degree 5 - Proposals or results and recommendations from
other scientists and
statements from national and foreign governments are reviewed
to assess their
contribution to Canada's federal marine policies, and their
acceptability in terms
of the strategies to be followed for related scientific
projects.
E. Degree 5 - The results of Canadian and foreign studies
and documents are interpreted
to determine their broad implications on, and their
relationship to Canada's own
initiatives, marine policies and long-term oceanographic
research plans.
F. Degree 5 - Authoritative advice and recommendations based
on a recognized expertise
in physical oceanography, in particular the movement and
modeling of waves, tides,
ice and various physical parameters, along with a broad
understanding of the role of
chemistry and biology, are provided to scientists, senior
department and other
government officials on marine science policy and research and
on marine environment
management and protection.
|
|
Management Responsibilities
|
3
|
A. Degree 1 - As a senior advisor the work does not usually
require supervising staff.
May assign or allocate work to project or task force members
when applicable.
B. Degree 1 - Usually limited to planning the use of
equipment and supplies for own
work.
C. Degree 3 - Recommends the acquisition of expertise and
equipment and the need for
specific projects to meet research priorities and objectives
and satisfy national
and international commitments.
D. Degree 4 - Selects, approves, negotiates and arranges for
suitable external
research groups to be funded, or provides advice based on
recognized expertise on
the requirements and selection through membership on several
committees.
|
|
E. Degree 3 - Develops and recommends effective science
program evaluation methods and performance measurement
criteria.
F. Degree 4 - Coordinates differing related research projects
done by various organizations and coordinates the transfer of the
outputs to other groups. Coordinates the input of divergent
sources, including industrial, university, provincial and federal
agencies, and international information into the policy planning
process.
G. Degree 2 - Implements effective procedures for the
transfer of scientific and technical information, and other
administrative procedures established for the work.
Impact of
Recommendations
4
A. Degree 5 - Results of work, recommendations, advice or
consultations influence the conduct of departmental policies and programs, contribute to
the marine science policies and the establishment of objectives
and affect the implementation and conduct of research studies,
projects that have national and international connotations.
B. Degree 4
(i) Recommendations, advice and consultations
contributes to policies or controls such as concerning site of industrial concerns or
developments and have economic and technological impacts on
industries associated with the marine environment. Results of the
work, advice and recommendation on ice, wave and current movement
can have economic effects on those concerns that rely on accurate
forecasts for their operations.
(ii) Degree 4 - Recommendations and advice contribute to the
development of the marine environmental resources while
maintaining the quality of that environment.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the
work have a direct effect on the safety of marine users like
fisherman, drilling rig operators and coastal communities.
C. Degree 4 - Development of new understandings of the
marine environment through organized and coordinated research
projects, results in an improved knowledge of the role played by
the ocean on the environment, the safety, the energy and the
source implications.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director, Oceanography and Contaminant Branch Scientific
Advisor
Chief, Ocean Tech. Division
Coord., Satellite and Remote Sensing Project
Chief, Intergovernmental Ocean Science and Survey Division
Asst. Director/Chief, National Programs Division
* Senior Officer/Advisor, Physical Oceanography
PC-4
Senior Aquatic Science Affairs Officer (B1-4)
Ocean Science Affairs Officer (PC-3)
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 17
|
Level: 4
|
Descriptive Title: Superintendent, Climate Assessment and
Impact Section (Applied Climatology Research and
Development)
|
|
Reporting to the Chief, Applications Analysis
and Impact Division:
Acts as authority in climate analysis,
assessment and impacts, and as scientific advisor on the
developmental applications of the principles and methods of
climatology, palae-, topo- and synoptic climatology, and
developmental applied and meso-scale meteorology in fields
relevant to user programs or activities and within the scope of the Canadian
Climate Program and the mandate of the Division.
Defines objectives, determines analytic and
investigative studies or projects, approaches, procedures and
resources, recommends approval of undertaking or develops, plans
and makes arrangements for implementation. Allocates resources,
assigns work, adjusts plans and work priorities and ensures that
effective scientific support is provided and objectives are met.
Plans, directs and controls the activities of the Section engaged
in applied climatology development, analysis, investigations and
assessment of impact of climate, trends and fluctuations,
conducting studies and field observations, investigative and
analytical projects for users and providing consultation
services, technical leadership and support or direction for
applied studies in the regions, satisfying climate data and assessment requirements of scientists, other
users in own and other departments/agencies, industrial or other
organizations and environmental interests engaged in programs or
activities related or sensitive to the climate, and to meet
Canada Climate program and Division's objectives and commitment
requirements within the Atmospheric Environment Services
(AES).
Supervises, administers and ensures effective
use of the Section's resources; provides professional guidance;
reviews work progress and achievement of objectives; controls the
expenditures of funds and utilization of resources made available
by client organizations for studies by the section or through
contractual undertakings for other departments/agencies such as
National Parks; administers and controls work of contractual
scientists for acceptability; reviews and reports on performance,
identifies staff development needs and participates to the
personnel management process.
Discusses developmental applications research
with groups concerned, identifies support required, problems and
areas requiring studies and the use of in-house and/or outside
resources. Determines feasibility of projects, Section's resource
capability, resources and support required for studies undertaken
outside the Services or within the Regions considering mandate,
policy, directives and guidelines. Determines appropriate
approach, suitability of referral, collaborative action and
in-house or contractural undertaking arrangements to satisfy new
or emerging demands for climatological data and climate
assessment. Negotiates terms and condition of studies undertaken
for client organizations or contracts for outside scientific
assistance work, ensuring contractural arrangements, conduct and
control of studies and results conform to requirements.
Initiates, recommends to users, assigns
resources and directs or provides technical leadership and
coordinates and controls consultative investigations and
analytical projects in applied climatology and meteorology.
Reviews the preparation of studies and assessments in support to
activities or programs of the AES, other departments,
governments' agencies and user organizations or in support
of, and in cooperation with university and other research and
industrial teams for resolving climatic problems. Directs the
preparation of papers, reports, handbooks,maps and atlases for
national and international or restricted distribution.
Participate to Climate Centre planning and
policy work and to the review of Division's programs, strategy
and objectives. Recommends on modifications and Section
contribution. Participates in the work of national and
international committees, task forces and panels to resolve
climate-related problems, to assess users requirements or for
recommending changes in policy, new initiatives and studies.
Contributes to the review and formulation of proposals and
recommendations 'pertaining to program activity policies, plans,
objectives and related matters as representative on departmental
and inter-departmental committees. Participates to inter-service
and inter-agency planning conferences, and assists in
coordinating, supervising or conducting related work, providing
advice on applications, strategy and approaches, making
recommendations on support and resources requirement and
reporting on divisional assignments. Conducts special studies
such as to evaluate the representativeness of existing
observation networks for establishing requirements and
advisability for additional stations. Contributes or prepare
position papers related to proposals or submissions for senior
management consideration.
Establishes liaisons and develops cooperation
between Canada and other countries' scientists engaged in related
climate programs, and organizes and implements workshops and
conferences to address a variety of climatological themes under
the Canadian Climate Program and other mandates.
Develops capability of the Section to deal with
emerging requirements, maintains contacts with the users to
identify requirements and responses, and with universities,
research and industrial teams and specialists to identify and
assess applicability of new developments. Reviews scientific and
technological advances and papers in areas of interest and
discusses merit with other scientists or professionals. Prepares
reports for own and other departments/agencies and presents
findings at professional meetings.
Reports on Section's activities and on
applications, priorities, and support requirements.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Objectives and Section's operational goals
are established with the
Division Chief and in consultations with users and are in
terms of the scientific
support to be provided to the Services and the users, and the
required supportive
related investigations and consultations within the scope of
the Services' program
objectives, strategy and Directorate's directives and policy
statements.
B. Degree 4 - The work involves the provision of
consultation services and
authoritative advice, the direction and supervision of the
activities and resources
of the Section in the applications of physical climatology,
palae-, synoptic and
topo-climatology and applied and meso-scale meteorology within
such application
areas as climate assessment and impacts on the environment,
regional planning, land
use, ecology, pollution, urbanization, and resources
management planning and policy,
and other areas of climatological influences on, or of impact
of human activities on
the atmospheric environment.
C. Degree 4 - Activities include serving as authority on
climate analysis, assessment
and impacts; providing expert advice, technical leadership and
consultations to
various organizations; organizing, controlling, coordinating
and supervising the
activities and resources of the Section and cooperative
studies; negotiating terms
and conditions with client organization and administering and
controlling allocated
resources and contractual scientists; acting as
representatives on committees and
making recommendations; reviewing work results; developing
cooperative programs and
approaches; writing scientific papers and organizing
conferences and workshops.
|
|
|
Degree
|
D. Degree 4 - The work requires planning, organizing and
coordinating the Section's
activities, climatological projects, original applications,
assessments and
cooperative program and studies; planning, negotiating and
organizing resources and
support to be provided and planning the development of the
Section's capability, with
commensurate freedom and latitude to meet its goals within
allocated resources
limitations, achievable cooperation from other organizations,
and the conditions,
funds and resources negotiated for studies/projects.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
4
|
A. Degree 3 - The work requires obtaining, by investigation
and archival data search,
information and data pertaining to a new field comprised of
merged disciplines
relevant to applied climatology and meteorology. In areas of
sparse data, field
observations or extrapolations are required. Normally, sources
may be identified
from past practices or studies.
B. Degree 4 - Information and data in areas of sparse data
are frequently impeded by
gaps in knowledge or must be founded on extrapolation and
merged discipline data
interpretation. Validation calls for extensive and difficult
or complex field
investigation.
C. Degree 4 - Information and data and the climatological
parameters associated with
the merged disciplines and the circumstances of their
application are characterized
by variability, many variables and present difficulty of
interpretation. Sound
professional judgment is required in the use of the data due
to the particular
constants and their variable values used as referrant for
determining variables as
implied in climate assessment and impact analysis or to use
extrapolated data in
areas of sparse data.
D. Degree 4 - Relationships amongst the climatic variables
and the environmental,
eco-systems, human activities, pollution, land use and
resources development and
management variables are complicate and the relationship
complex to establish and
not fully understood. In-depth investigative studies and
analysis are required to
deal with inherent conflicting relationships and
interpretation problems.
E. Degree 4 - Consultative and investigative work and
methods are normally affected by
other scientist and user activities and demands. Results and
proposal papers are
affected by user's activities and requirements; negotiations
and conduct of
multi-jurisdictional program projects are affected by
activities of representatives
and officials of other organizations. Implications on the work
must be considered.
F. Degree 4 - Contacts are with scientists and professionals
of own and other departments
and other levels of government, officials of private
enterprises and universities to
discuss problems, service's programs and cooperative projects
and to negotiate
funds, resources and terms of agreement for studies
undertaken.
G. Degree 4 - The work pertains to a new field comprised of
merged disciplines.
Climatological investigation methods and original approaches
to observing techniques
and equipment are required to resolve climate related
problems; custom topoclimatic
survey techniques and procedures are developed and original
approaches to data
reduction/application theory are devised to interpret climate
in terms such as
pollution, ecology, land use, resources management, and for
novel applications and
enhanced scientific support. Precedents often do not
exist.
H. Degree 4 - Work requires a thorough knowledge of physical
climatology involving
palae-, topo- and synoptic climatology, climatography, applied
and meso-scale
meteorology. A good knowledge of statistics, climatological
archiving,
instrumentation and hydrology. A knowledge of fields of impact
such as pollution,
eco-systems, land use, regional planning, resources management
is also necessary.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Professional Responsibility
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Overall accomplishment, key recommendations
and conclusions are reviewed
by the Division Chief against goals and established general
objectives. Scientific
papers and reports are reviewed by other senior scientists for
constructive
criticism.
B. Degree 4 - As an authority in the area, little
professional guidance can usually be
obtained within the organization. On the resolution of unusual
and complex impact
assessment problems, guidance can be obtained from scientific
establishments and
other authorities elsewhere. Guidance is provided by the
Division Chief in matter
involving difficult negotiations, Division's objectives and
new programs.
C. Degree 4 - The work requires defining specific
objectives for the Section's units,
determining approaches, requirements and limitations
pertaining to scientific
support services, terms and objectives of cooperative
projects, dealing with
problems encountered by the Section's units and establishing
scientific guidelines
and procedures for the work and the use of the scientific
resources.
D. Degree 4 - Work and recommendations of subordinate staff
are reviewed for soundness
of judgment. Reports, conclusions and recommendations of
consultants are reviewed
for acceptability and technical merit against requirements.
Results of studies and
proposals of other scientists related to specialized area are
reviewed for
applicability.
E. Degree 4 - Result of climatological studies,
investigations, climate and impact
assessment and of cooperative and contracted undertakings are
interpreted to determine
the significance and the implications of conclusions and
recommendations on the
effectiveness of the support provided and the achievement of
program goals and
Section's objectives.
F. Degree 4 - Advice based on a recognized expertise in
climatological applications,
climate assessment and impact is provided to other scientists,
management and
officials in own organization and other departments,
scientists or officials of
other levels of government, and agencies and to industry on
climate, trends, changes
and impact, new areas of application of findings and on
effects of human activities
on the atmospheric environment.
|
|
Management Responsibilities
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - The work requires the operational management
and supervision of a group
of professional climatologists, senior technicians, computer
application system
specialist and a subordinate supervisor plus additional staff
as applicable on
seasonal and project work.
B. Degree 4 - Allocates the use of equipment, supplies and
facilities for the on-going
work of the Section, field observations, investigative
projects and analytical
studies.
C. Degree 4 - Forecasts and assesses requirements, plans
and develops projects,
including estimations of the financial, equipment and human
resources required to
meet the Section's objective and work priorities and for the
budget cycle and
multi-year operational plans. Conducts special studies such as
to establish needs
for, and advises on additional observation network
stations.
D. Degree 4 - Seeks support or collaboration of other
government services and private
corporations and negotiates for required outside assistance,
services and resources
with principals of outside organizations, universities and
other governmental
sources and negotiates funds and person-years from other
related government depart
ments, to provide climatological research and assessment data
and information.
|
|
|
Degree
|
E. Degree 4 - Controls and coordinates project schedules and
operational work plans and
performance, follows-up and takes necessary actions to ensure
negotiated contract
work requirements and standards as to quality, cost and
effectiveness are met.
F. Degree 4 - Coordinates the various analytical and data
services provided by the
Section and the different simultaneous special projects, field
observations,
investigations and consultation/advisory work with those of
users and collaborating
organizations.
G. Degree 3 - Interprets and implements administrative
procedures and management
directives and guidelines for the utilization of the
resources, the negotiation,
control and monitoring of contracted projects, and the
negotiation or agreement and
control procedures concerning outside service contracts or
cooperative support.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Results of the work, recommendations, advice
and consultations contribute
to the development of policies, instigation of major projects
and the conduct of
other scientific work using the services. Decisions also
affect the participation
in collaborative applied developmental research and the use of
external sources for
contract studies.
B. Degree 4 -
(i) Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice and consultations have
both economic and
technological effects on a wide variety of industries, ranging
from urban
development, recreation and tourism, to industrial expansion,
hydro projects,
agriculture, mining and forestry.
(ii) Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice or consultations
affect the conservation and
long term planning of uses of natural resources that are
impacted by changes in
climate.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No significant impact.
C. Degree 4 - The development of new concepts and approaches
and work results or
findings contribute to the overall. understanding of the
impact of climatic changes
in the long-term and their effect on climate-sensitive sectors
and eco-systems.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director, Climatological Applications Branch Chief,
Applications and Impact Division - Superintendent, Arctic
Meteorology
- Head, Energy and Industrial Applications
- Superintendent, Bioclimate
- Head, Biometeorology Research
* - Superintendent, Climate Assessment and Impact Section
PC-4
- Land Use Climatologist (2) PC-3
- Topoclimatologist (1) PC-1
- Impact Monitoring and Analysis (MT-6)
- Computing Specialist (CS-2)
- Biometeorology Technician (EG)
- Field Surveys Technician (EG) * Bench-Mark
Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION
DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 18
|
Level: 4
|
Descriptive Title: Resource Engineering (Marine) Geophysicist
(Western Arctic)
|
|
Reporting to the Head, Environmental Marine Geology
Subdivision:
|
|
Plans, coordinates and conducts near surface
marine geological, geophysical, geotechnical and engineering
research in the Arctic regions of Canada, particularly the
Beaufort Sea and which includes investigations of the erosion and
sediment accumulation on the sea floor, from both a modern and an
historical perspective, and the stability of seabed
sediments.
Establishes, in cooperation with oil companies
and other departments and agencies, the long-term objectives and
priorities for Arctic seabed research. Prepares and solicits
research proposals and reviews, evaluates and selects proposals
for scientific content and applicability for funding; allocates
funds and evaluates the performance of funded research.
Manages external research contracts with universities and
industry, relating to short-term geotechnical research. Plans,
coordinates and executes joint industry and government research
projects, and directs and supervises group's staff.
Proposes the methodologies and technology
required to conduct studies in the laboratory or in the field,
evaluates new methodologies and technologies, and initiates the
development or modification of instrumentation to collect
data.
Plans, organizes and conducts scientific field
operations which includes negotiating ship time; arranging for
logistical support, supplies and services; scientific
coordination; and controlling expenditures and the use of
equipment, facilities and supplies.
Integrates and synthesizes multi-disciplinary
research information and formulates models to explain the
evolution and history of Arctic continental shelves and ocean
basin and to evaluate the nature and severity of seabed
instability in these regions. Publishes findings in scientific
journals and in internal reports and presents to national and
international conferences.
Provides advice on near-surface marine geology
and seabed stability to federal regulatory, engineering
and environmental agencies and industry for the
establishment of safe structures, procedures and practices for
the exploration and production of offshore oil and gas.
Acts as departmental advisor to other federal departments on
the assessment of environmental impact statements, and represents
the department before panels and at public hearings.
|
Degree
|
specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Objectives of the work are discussed with,
and are stated by the Head in
terms of Branch policies and research project goals, and
long-term objectives and
priorities established in cooperation with industry and other
government agencies
concerned.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 4 - Work involves geological, geophysical and
geotechnical research for the
Arctic seabed, and including sediment process studies, the
definition of lithology,
strathigraphy and structure and the evaluation of sediment
stability.
C. Degree 4 - Activities differ from one another and include
conducting near-surface
marine research; coordinating cooperative industry/government
research projects;
controlling scientific field operations' expenditures, the use
of equipment,
facilities and supplies, and organizing scientific and
technical support;
supervising research staff; and providing scientific and
technical advice.
D. Degree 4 - Plans, organizes and delegates work for complex
research projects within
the marine environment which must be carried out under
difficult Arctic environmental
and logistical conditions. Ensures that the programs of
diverse groups are
coordinated including work on a research vessel, to achieve
the maximum efficiency
while making scientific progress.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - The work requires obtaining multi-disciplinary
information and data by
independent or joint detailed research projects in difficult
to access marine
offshore and Arctic locations. The information is also
supplied by other public and
government organizations and from research contracts and this
material must be
integrated and synthesized into evolutionary Arctic geological
models in a
particularly complex region. Collected data must be also
suitable for use by
scientists in different disciplines.
B. Degree 4 - Information and data often pertain to new areas
of information.
Validating the information and the data calls for innovative
and intensive
investigations under tough Arctic and offshore conditions.
Data can only be
verified with great difficulty and at great expense.
C. Degree 4 - Information and data concern those parameters
which define such subjects
as permafrost, hydrates, slumping, faulting, ice scour, soil
properties, pingos and
mud volcanoes that establish nature of the seabed. These data
can be highly
variable, difficult to interpret and require sound
professional judgement to use.
D. Degree 4 - The data collected from near surface marine
geological research represent
a complex array of variables connected by relationships that
require considerable
ingenuity to interpret, resolve conflicts, and formulate into
evolutionary models.
E. Degree 4 - The work is normally being affected by the
activities of officials and
scientist from oil companies and other federal and provincial
government agencies,
as well as universities. Consideration of such activities and
their implications
are required when preparing project plans and long-term
proposals and performing
work.
F. Degree 4 - Contacts are with scientists and officials in
the oil, industry, other
federal departments, boards of enquiry and universities for
providing expert witness
and technical advice, exchanging information, negotiating
joint research programs,
conducting work, allocating resources and dealing with
problems.
G. Degree 4 - Work requires proposing and evaluating new
technologies and methodologies
and initiating the development of new instrumentation to meet
requirements for the
collection of new types of information often in a
difficult-to-define environment
and where precedents often do not exist.
H. Degree 4 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the
principles, theory and practices of geology involving marine
geophysical and
geotechnology and a knowledge of petroleum and safety
engineering, environmental
science and advanced instrumentation.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Professional Responsibility
|
4
|
A. Degree 4 - The evaluation and the selection of rese0arch
proposals for scientific
content and applicability to program objectives is accepted,
with the resultant
outputs being reviewed against the directives of the division
and the attainment of
established objectives.
B. Degree 4 - Professional guidance is received from Senior
staff for problems of a
difficult administrative or complex scientific nature.
Approaches to unusually
difficult and hazardous problems are often resolved in
cooperation with other
scientists.
C. Degree 4 - The work requires reviewing, evaluating and
selecting research proposals
for scientific content and applicability to program objectives
and acceptability for
funding and to recommend options for complex scientific and
difficult problems posed
by operating under difficult Arctic environmental and physical
conditions.
D. Degree 4 - Other scientist's proposals for research
projects in the Canadian Arctic
related to oil and gas exploration are reviewed for
acceptability and selected for
funding. The results of the work of other Scientists is
reviewed for applicability
to departmental seabed studies.
E. Degree 4 - Results of own and other peoples studies are
interpreted to determine the
implications for Canada's research work in the Arctic
environment and are evaluated
for their impact on the ongoing oil and gas exploration in the
Arctic region.
F. Degree 5 - Authoritative advice and recommendations for
scientific research, seabed
evolution stability, geologic hazards and constraints to
offshore development and
safety of offshore engineering facilities, oil and gas
exploration in the Arctic
environment, and on the appropriate equipment and technology
to be used, are given
to senior scientists and officials in industry and
government.
|
|
Management Responsibilities
|
4
|
A. Degree 3 - The work normally includes the supervision of
one technician and one
professional but may include others when appropriate.
B. Degree 4 - Allocates funds, person years, equipment, and
ship time to projects
according to priority.
C. Degree 4 - Evaluates, priorizes and selects the research
programs and proposals
relating to seabed geology and engineering and environmental
requirements in the
Arctic. Develops, recommends and implements plans for in-house
research projects
and for the acquisition and use of required resources and
expenditure of funds.
D. Degree 4 - Selects, negotiates, advises on, and
administers research contracts
performed by non-government groups for arctic seabed
research.
E. Degree 4 - Controls and coordinates project schedules
with industry and
universities, and evaluates industry development proposals in
terms of stability and
safety of offshore engineering facilities to ensure they meet
the priorities and
objectives of the offshore geotechnical and Beaufort Sea
programs.
F. Degree 4 - Coordinates environmental, safety and
exploration activities between
departments, industry and universities for research programs
relating to Arctic
seabed studies.
G. Degree 3 - Interprets and implements administrative,
safety and management
directives and guidelines established for the work.
|
|
Degree
|
Impact of
Recommendations
4
|
A. Degree 4 - Recommendations and advice control the
direction of near-surface marine
geological research in the Canadian Arctic and contribute to
the development of
governmental policy and affect the implementation of projects
done by governmental
organizations, and joint industry-government, universities and
research contractors.
Study results and information provided, contribute to the
formulation of policies
regarding regulation, allocation and revenue to be derived
from exploitation.
B. Degree 4 -
(i) Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice and consultations, and
decisions have both
economic and technological effects on Arctic oil and gas
exploration and affect
the direction of Arctic research and the safe engineering
structure design
procedures and practices of offshore oil and gas exploration
and production
facilities.
(ii) Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice and consultations
contribute to the
development of oil and gas reserves and affect Canada's
position as a producer
of these raw materials and contribute to minimize
environmental risk.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) Degree 3 - Recommendations and advice affect the use and
procedures of offshore
oil and gas facilities to minimize the safety risk to the
workers associated
with their development.
C. Degree 4 - Developments of new concepts and approaches
improve the understanding of
the sedimentary and geomorphic processes active on the shelf
and slope of the
Beaufort Sea and other areas of the Arctic and contribute to
the knowledge of
geologic hazards and constraints on offshore oil and gas
exploration and production.
Results of scientific investigation lead to the development of
new technology and
methodology.
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director, Atlantic Geoscience Centre
Head, Environmental Marine Geology
- Seismo Stratigrapher (South East Canadian
margin)
- Seismo Stratigrapher (Eastern Arctic to
Labrador)
- Research Geochemist (Geochemistry)
- Paleoecologist Sedimentologist (Inlets
and Deltas)
- Coastal Geologist/Sedimentologist
(Coastal Zones)
* - Resource Engineering (Marine)
Geophysicist (Western Arctic) PC-4
- Beaufort Sea Engineer EN-ENG-3 (Term)
- Geological Technician (EG)
* Bench-mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION
DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 19
|
Level: 5
|
Descriptive Title: Senior Advisor, Metallurgical
Technology
|
|
|
|
Reporting to the Director, Mineral Sciences Laboratories:
|
|
Carries out technical and economic assessments of the smelter
modernization, S02 control and metallurgical
technology development and capital assistance proposals submitted
by the metallurgical industry for government financial support.
Develops criteria and evaluates technological proposals, assesses
alternatives to determine technically and economically sound
options, ensuring project feasibility within prescribed
timeframe, resources capability and improvements to proposals,
defining and organizing for required assistance to
develop capital and operating cost of unit operation and whole
process, working in consultation with senior industry, government
and contractor personnel. Ensures acceptability and project
priority ranking considering relative cost and long term benefit
in liaison with industry and federal and provincial government
personnel. Evaluates and recommends on proposals for Canada
Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology (CANMET) contract
research. Carries out techno-economic assessments of off-shore
technologies to ensure competitiveness, by world standards, of
technologies promoted in Canada. Ensures complementary approach
to research and coordination of technology development
initiatives through liaison and communication w th personnel of
CANMET, own and other federal and provincial government
departments/agencies.
Advises senior management of own and other
Department on the technical matters related to the evaluation and
implementation of the proposals and makes authoritative
recommendations to federal and provincial government departments
on action choices, negotiation of proposals and on warranted
government support of the projects.
Serves in an advisory capacity to industry and
government in the development of strategies for commercial
implementation and/or technology transfer related to
metallurgical technology development and as technical consultant
to other departments involved, federal/provincial management and
other committees on the pilot scale testing and commercialization
of particular processes. Serves in a consulting capacity to CANMET and to own and
other departments/agencies concerned on the development of new
metallurgical technologies (foreign and domestic), and as the
technological/ scientific authority on federal/provincial,
interdepartmental and industry Technical Advisory and
Coordinating Committees concerned with projects related to
non-ferrous smelter modernization and 502 control to
recommend related strategies to Ministers. Serves in a consulting
capacity to members of own and other departments/agencies and to
departmental executives, industry and federal and provincial
government departments in those matters related to non-ferrous
smelter modernization and 502 control in Canada.
Chairs/co-chairs federal/provincial technical advisory committee
meetings concerning government/industry shared cost smelter
modernization projects in various provinces.
Prepares, in cooperation with scientific and other personnel
of own and other departments concerned and industrial
contractors, technical and economic evaluation of metallurgical
technology development projects initiated or carried out by
industry with government financial support and of technologies
developed by CANMET, makes recommendations for further studies
and/or commercial implementation or reviews, provides
authoritative recommendations and advice on the final evaluation
of projects and participates in the development of technology
transfer strategy. Assists, as scientific authority, in the
initiation of, and monitors, projects related to non-ferrous
smelter modernization and S02 control, preparing work
statements for project initiation and providing assistance to
departments involved for approval and implementation.
Provides reports and documentation to management committees
and to management of departments concerned on the progress and
evaluation of smelter modernization projects and makes
recommendations on priority areas for CANMET participation in
complementary R&D and on continuation of the projects, based
on technological progress, economic assessments and financial
management. Acts as main contact in the non-ferrous metal
smelters study and as recognized CANMET expert in metallurgical
processing technologies.
Makes recommendations to own and other departments and
provincial government on various relevant programs, projects and
proposals, and provides detailed rationale for their support,
rejection or modification. Prepares papers for presentation and
publication on the evaluation and potential of new metallurgical
technologies for application in Canada and elsewhere and
contributes to the initiation and evaluation of cooperative
projects with Economic European Community bodies and participates
in technology transfer missions to promote Canadian developed
technologies and/or evaluate competitive options.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - The objectives of the work are set by senior
management in terms of the
current policy for the deployment of government funds from
various program sources
to promote the growth of Canada's metal industry and to reduce
SO2 emissions through
smelter modernization, smelting technological development and
more efficient and
economical processes and new extraction techniques.
B. Degree 5 - Work involves the provision of authoritative
advice and recommendations
on a diversity of major projects for improving smelter
technologies, developing new
processes for SO2 capture and reducing or
eliminating sulphur in smelter feed, new
pyro - and hydro-metallurgical processes and new extraction
techniques.
C. Degree 5 - Activities include technical and economic
assessments of technology
developments, capital assistance proposals by industry and of
the impact on Canada's
overall ability to be competitive by world standards;
recommending and advising on
changes in policy to maintain Canada's market position;
evaluating and recommending
acceptance or continuation of projects or studies, providing
authoritative advice on
smelter modernization technology; identifying and recommending
methods to deal with
complex related problems; evaluating technological development
options, economic
feasibility and impact; and, acting as a liaison with industry
and other
governments.
D. Degree 5 - The work requires planning, coordinating and
implementing a diversity of
major technical studies and coordinating the federal and
provincial governments role
and funding in non-ferrous smelter modernization.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - The work requires coordinating and collecting
data from a broad range of
major metallurgical processes and comprising up to 30 unit
operations. The data
supplied, the information in the proposals and the
technological alternatives to be
evaluated must often be complemented requiring involved
investigations or studies
and careful scrutiny. Sources often must be developed or can
be reluctant to prov`de
technological sensitive information or data. Extensive
correlation with existing
information for accurate assessment is required.
B. Degree 5 - Information and data may not be completely
validatable due to absence of
comparable data or where feasibility or opportunity for
required lengthy and costly
investigation, must be v ewed within resources limitation and
other constraints.
Selection, acceptance and use of data require sound
professional judgement.
|
|
|
Degree
|
C. Degree 5 - Information data on smelter modernization,
development of complex new
metallurgical technologies, process plans and extraction
techniques involve a w de
range of highly variable data, present sizeable ambiguities
and often are poorly
understood due to complexity. Ingenuity, highly selective and
knowledgeable
professional judgment must be exercised for their evaluation
and use.
D. Degree 5 - Relationships between the many variables
involved in a major metallurgical
process are complex and there are often conflicting opinions
on their interpretation
and use. Evaluation, in addition to the technological
dimension, must include consideration of the market
conditions for mineral commodities, their relationships
between economics related variables and metallurgical industry
accounting practices
conflicts. Data from these sources are often difficult or
impossible to reconcile
with the primary technical evaluation.
E. Degree 5 - The work undertaken for this government
program activity and initiatives
is significantly affected by the activities of mining and
metallurgy companies,
other federal and provincial governments as well as by the
work of research
scientists or officials, both in Canada and elsewhere.
F. Degree 4 - Contacts are with industry senior scientists,
engineers and mining company
executives, senior government personnel and officials to
negotiate federal government
involvement in major or new technological improvements to
Canada's smelter and metallurgical operations. Work also
involves contacts with engineering consulting firms
officials or senior personnel in Canada and in other countries
as well as with
national an international research organizations.
G. Degree 5 - Work requires approving or recommending new
methods for mineral extraction
and metallurgical processes that will maintain Canada's
position in the world
market. Advises on the feasibility and use of untried
technologies.
H. Degree 5 - The work requires the application of an
advanced knowledge of the
principles, theories and practices pertaining to the
production of ferrous,
non-ferrous, metallic and non-metallic mineral commodities and
involving the physics
and chemistry, thermodynamics, chemical engineering,
engineering design and economics
of hydro-metallurgical and pyro-metallurgical extraction
processes and mineral
benefication systems. A good knowledge of related fields such
as the mining,
utilization and marketing of mineral commodities and
conditions affecting
competitiveness of Canada's mineral industry, and of
government funding mechanisms
is also necessary.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - Results are evaluated in terms of Canada's
attainment of its policy and
objectives of reducing
SO2emissions and maintaining a
competitive minerals industry
through the use of government supported technology development
projects.
B. Degree 5 - Guidance is received from Senior staff on
program implications and
progress made towards achieving federal government objectives.
Professional
guidance may be obtained by discussions with other senior
scientists. The field of
work is highly complex with relatively few top ranking private
consultants.
C. Degree 5 - The work requires assessing major
technological proposals and alternatives,
defining scientific objectives, establishing funding and
resources requirements and
approaches to major project proposal problems and appropriate
scheduling for those
that meet the criteria for inclusion in the government
program.
D. Degree 5 - Major studies and projects submitted by other
scientists and engineers
from industry and proposed technological alternatives are
evaluated for acceptance
or rejection, modification and continuation as part of the
program and in terms of
their validity and effectiveness with respect to policy and
resources limitations.
Studies by other scientist are evaluated for their impact on
smelter design,
metallurgical process improvement and objectives.
|
|
|
Degree
|
E. Degree 5 - Results of the work are interpreted to
determine their implications on
the continuation of the federal government's initiative on
smelter modernization and
metallurgical process development.
F. Degree 5 - Authoritative advice and recommendations are
given as recognized
government expert on mineral extraction and non-ferrous
smelter modernization, design
and operation and S02 control, to senior members of
other government departments,
company executives senior industry personnel and senior
consultants.
|
|
Management Responsibilities
|
4
|
A. Degree 1 - As a senior advisory position the work does
not involve continuing
responsibility for staff, but may require assigning evaluation
and monitoring
assistance tasks and instructing assisting scientists as
necessary.
B. Degree 1 - Devises long- and short-form plans for use of
own time.
C. Degree 4 - Assesses requirements and develops plans for
the acquisition and use of
resources and expenditure of funds from a range of government
sources to evaluate
development proposals for financial support and meet the
objectives of smelters
modernization for SO2 abatement and metallurgical
technology development programs.
D. Degree 5 - Approves or recommends suitable proposals and
the expenditure of funds,
assessing, selecting and negotiating federal-industry
agreements for research and
pilot-plant projects or full scale trials such as for
SO2 emission reduction, and
arranging for their funding through the appropriate government
mechanism. Provides
authoritative advice on the selection of contractors and
sub-contractors and on
technology research and development on the laboratory and
plant scales.
E. Degree 4 - Controls and coordinates major projects to
assist industry and meet
federal environment protection objectives. Evaluates progress
to ensure it meets
federal requirements for performances, efficiency and
economy.
F. Degree 5 - Coordinates technology development
initiatives, proposals assessment
studies and projects (about 10 major and 50 smaller project
per year) with industry
executives, federal and provincial officials and contractors
who have divergent and
often conflicting priorities. Arranges and coordinates expert
support within the
government for a complementary research approach and projects
evaluation.
G. Degree 1 - Follows office and field administrative
procedures established for the
work.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - Results of the work and authoritative
recommendations and advice affect
the departmental development policies and programs to
modernize Canadian smelter and
metallurgical operations. Decisions affect which projects are
funded and to what
extent, and affect the functions provided by other government
departments in terms of
technical help and funding. Evaluates all projects in field of
expertise for the
entire Federal Government.
B. Degree 5 -
(i) Degree 5 - Authoritative recommendations and advice have a
substantial impact
on the Canadian minerals industry both in terms of
technological change,
efficiency and economic viability and environmental
emission.
(ii) Degree 5 - Authoritative recommendations and advice have
a substantial effect
on the exploitation of Canadian mineral resources in terms of
increased or
improved recovery, and reduction of waste and pollutants and d
rectly
contributes to resources conservation and use and to
environment protection.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No other significant impact.
|
|
C. Degree 5 - Decisions, authoritative advice and
recommendations, evaluation and results of the work contribute
new insights for improved design, installation and operation of
smelter and mineral processing technology, enhanced ability to
competitively exploit mineral resources and improved
environmental protection knowledge.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHARTDirector General, Technology
CANMET.
Director, Mineral Science Laboratories
*- Senior Advisor, Metallurgical Technology PC 5 R&D
Program Coordinator (SE-RES) Senior Industrial Research Officer
PC-4 Manager, Chemical Laboratory Manager, National Uranium
Tailings Program Manager, Mineral Processing Laboratory Manager,
Extractive Metallurgy Laboratory Technical Support Section
(EL-6), (EL-4) Administrative Officer Secretary
* Bench Mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 20
|
Level: 5
|
Descriptive Title: Chief, Scientific Information,
(Analysis and Assessments Services Division)
|
|
|
|
Reporting to the Regional Director, Science: Pacific
Region
|
|
Acts as the scientific authority and advisor to
scientists, senior management and officials in own and other
departments, provincial government departments and industry in
matters pertaining to the evaluation of marine resource
development proposals and environmental assessment and the
provision, analysis and interpretation of oceanographic,
climatological and marine resource and environmental data and
information for the management and exploitation of the resources
and protection of the marine environment.
Plans, directs and controls the activities and
resources of the Services responsible for: the implementation of
the Marine Environmental Services Program for marine
environmental assessments and responses for scientific aspects of
environmental reviews and assessments; the appraisal of
industrial development proposals and environmental impact
statements; the establishment and operation of a marine
climatological data and oceanographic information and climate
prediction service for the Pacific Region and of a comprehensive
Regional Oceanographic Data Service for the gathering,
interpretation, assessment, synthesizing, archiving and
dissemination of scientific multi-disciplinary data and
information for the Pacific and Western Arctic; the establishment
of an inventory of marine scientific data of the region and of an
institute technical record unit of marine environmental data and
departmental reports for scientific support; the preparation,
marketing and communication of scientific information products to
governments, resource industry and other clients; the provision
of advice, analyses, scientific interpretation and the liaison
between scientists, management and officials of organizations
concerned.
Recommends divisional scientific information
policy objectives and strategies to the Director, and implements
scientific information, analyses, assessment and data service
programs to meet intent of policies. Defines Services detailed
program work, evaluation criteria and budget requirements, sets
priorities ensuring balanced program emphasis to satisfy marine
clients urgent demands, fisheries and environmental protection
long-term objective and requirements, and national/international
scientific data concerns. Determines areas of staff
responsibility and allocates work and resources. Carries out
staff supervisory, administrative and management duties,
providing guidance to subordinates and reviewing performance;
enhances the capability of the Services to meet requirements, and
fosters cooperative services. Coordinates the activities with the
Regional Science sectors and other federal, provincial,
university and international programs. Approves or recommends the
expenditure of resources, reviews Services' work progress,
controls expenditure of funds allocated for research contracts
and assess reports for fulfillment of terms and conditions.
Implements data management policy, standards
and procedures consistent with those of the Marine Environmental
Data Service and recognized international oceanographic data
services, and in keeping with data storage and communication
technology. Establishes controls and procedures for data
appraisal and the handling of data of a proprietary or regulatory
nature and data services available from the Division. Ensures
compatibility of the data program activities and objectives with
regional scientists' projects, Fisheries Operations systems,
Atmospheric Environment Service, global data systems and
international data centres. Determines the need and directs the
preparation of information products such as atlases. Promotes
internal and outside awareness of the Region's scientific
output.
Provides authoritative scientific advice on matters related to
Arctic Water and Ocean Dumping Control Acts, development of
marine environmental legislation, industrial operating
regulation, conditions, strategies and on Ocean Dumping research
applications to resolve problems and for future planning.
Represents the Region in scientific, planning and program
matters. Conducts the Annual appraisal and Priority selection of
research proposals for Ocean Dumping in conjunction with
Environment Canada and initiates studies, reviews and assessments
of problems in pollution or recommends research.
Appraises
research proposals for scientific validity and assesses
scientific reports. Contributes with Fisheries Operations sector,
other departments and the Province to the planning for
environmental reviews and public hearings. Represents the
department or the branch on various advisory or development
committees for regulation of activities in the marine
environment, reviewing proposals, assessments and advising.
Carries out managerial assignments to assist
the Director and senior management of the Regional Science Sector
in areas such as regional policy and program analysis and
evaluation, planning, coordination, control and reporting systems
for relevant and integrated/coordinated or
multi-services/disciplines programs, research or surveys,
bilateral agreements, program activity structure development,
revenue recovery and conflicts resolution concerning inter/intra
departmental submissions and marine environment, resources
exploitation and exploration guidelines. Establishes required
liaison with regional headquarters management and program
authorities, senior officials of industry and representatives of
provincial, federal, university and international organizations
concerning integrated/ coordinated programs, bilateral agreements
and marine sciences related problems. Assesses and makes
recommendations to the Director on programs effectiveness,
progress, and impact on departmental priorities, fisheries and
habitat management objectives, science integration initiatives
and planning process.
Deals with or advises on conflicting or
incompatible environmental assessments of proposals and responses
to difficult technical enquiries from industry. Develops
proposals and makes recommendations on environmental
legislations. Writes scientific papers and reports.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - Objectives of the Division are established by
the Regional Director in
terms of overall goals, policy and priorities for the
management of the marine
resources and the protection of the marine environment in the
Pacific and Western
Arctic Region.
B. Degree 5 - The work is performed within the
multi-disciplinary areas comprising the
Region Science-sector and Science-Pacific Research for the
development and
management of the marine resources and environment protection
program.
C. Degree 5 - Activities involve the provision of
authoritative scientific advice and
recommendations on multi-disciplinary aspects of marine
resources management, development and exploitation and
protection of the marine environment, on the provision,
assessment and interpretation of scientific data/information and
on policy, legislation and regulation; the direction of
specialized Services and the performance of managerial and
administrative functions; the assessment of, and advise on marine
development proposals and impact, research proposals and
application; the evaluation of work progress and implication on
Regional and Division program objectives; the liaison with other
organizations for co-ordination and compatibility of objectives;
the provision of guidance on approaches to resolve conflicts and
incompatible environmental assessments of proposals or difficult
technical inquiries from
industry.
D. Degree 5 - The work requires planning, coordinating, and
implementing the Division
services; advising on marine environmental legislation,
resources development
regulation and ocean dumping research planning and strategy;
developing financial
multi-year plans for marine physical, biological and chemical
sciences, and
hydrography, program activity structure and revenue recovery
plans; and, formulating
changes to programs, policies and strategies.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Complexity of Work
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - The work requires identifying or developing
sources and means of
obtaining the information, coordinating the collection and
selection of multi
disciplinary information and data on marine resources,
climate, environment and
activities in the marine environment over a wide and difficult
geographic area
(ranging from B.C. coastal fjords and open ocean to Western
Arctic ice-laden waters)
and the gathering, deriving from, and the synthesizing of a
diversity of
multi-disciplinary studies and findings related to off-shore
oil, gas and mineral
exploration, fisheries and environmental protection. Raw data
obtained with great
difficulty, are complex, often incomplete or cannot be
repeated.
B. Degree 5 - Information and data often must be accepted as
obtained or derived and/or
reviewed based on former research information. Given the
geographic area, inherent
constraints or changing conditions the data usually may not be
completely
validatable.
C. Degree 5 - Most of the many variables involved in
climatological and oceanographic
(physical, biological and chemical) resources exploration,
development and marine
environment data are characterized by high variability and
ambiguity. Ingenuity and
highly selective professional judgment for using
data/information derived by/from
studies/projects of other scientists of various disciplines
are required.
D. Degree 5 - Marine environmental and development proposal
assessment and the industry
practices, pollution and the multi-disciplinary parameters
measured and appraised
and their significance to marine resources often result in
conflicting viewpoints
calling for scientific compromises, trade-offs and
recommendations for new
regulations, research priorities, or changes to existing
policy or legislation.
Relationships between many variables are conflicting and
difficult to define.
E. Degree 5 - The work is affected by the activities of
industrial concerns, provincial
governments and other federal government departments officials
and scientists
working in the marine environment. Implications of these
activities must be
considered in providing authoritative advice, determining
services strategies,
requirements and long-term priorities.
F. Degree 5 - Contacts are with senior scientists and
officials of federal, provincial
governments and industry at the regional, national and
international levels where
conflicting interest or objectives are represented in
situations such as
conflicting/incompatible proposal assessments, mitigative
measures and environmental
trade-offs, ocean dumping, offshore development and operating
condition regulation;
and bilateral agreements.
G. Degree 4 - Work requires developing procedures and
techniques for implementing and
enhancing the services and applications to novel situations,
the accumulation, dissemination and marketing of scientific
information or the control, and handling of data of special
nature. New techniques using novel approaches are developed to
resolve conflicts related to assessment and proposals, bilateral
agreements and integrated program or to deal with difficult
technical inquiries. Precedents often do not exist.
H. Degree 5 - The work requires the application of an
advanced knowledge of the
principles, theories and practices of physical oceanography
with a strong emphasis
on the inter-influences of human activities, marine resources
and oceanic processes
complemented by a good knowledge of marine development,
resources exploration and
environmental assessment, marine biology, chemistry,
climatology and hydrography,
and of managerial functions, computerized scientific
information system and applications to the field of
work.
|
|
|
Degree
|
Professional Responsibility
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - Results of the work are reviewed with the
Regional Director to ensure
intent of policies and program objectives are met.
B. Degree 5 - Guidance is received on policy intent and
formulation from senior
management and on scientific issues by discussions with other
scientific
authorities.
C. Degree 5 - The work requires defining overall divisional
policies, goals and
priorities, developing conceptual approaches for resolving
complex assessments,
establishing coordinated multi-disciplinary research programs
and scientific
guidelines for information/data effectiveness.
D. Degree 5 - Recommendations and conclusions of staff
specialists are reviewed for
their ability to meet policy directives and Division's program
objectives and
priorities. Environmental impact statements are evaluated for
compatibility with
policies. Major studies by contractors and other scientists
are evaluated for their
impact on programs and objectives, and research proposals are
appraised for
scientific validity and opportunity.
E. Degree 5 - Results of marine multi-disciplinary studies
and recommendations,
conclusion or assessment and impact of major development
proposals are interpreted
to determine their broad implications on the strategy and
effectiveness of other
program activities of the Science-Sector and the marine
environment protection and
resources management.
F. Degree 5 - Provides authoritative scientific advice and
recommendations to senior
management and officials on matters related to Arctic Water
and Ocean Dumping
Control Acts, development of marine environmental legislation
and the setting of
industrial operating regulations, conditions and strategies,
and on ocean dumping
research and applications to resolve marine environmental
problems. Authoritative
advice and recommendations are also provided to other
scientists on marine develop
ment proposals and environmental assessments, response to
difficult enquiries from
industry, mitigative measures and acceptable environmental
trade-offs and on
programs, policy, objectives, priorities and services provided
by the Division.
|
|
Management Responsibilities
|
5
|
A. Degree 3 - The work normally requires the supervision of
the Divisional Services
comprised of a scientific, advisory and support staff.
B. Degree 4 - Establishes the requirements and allocates and
controls the use of
equipment, supplies and facilities of the division.
C. Degree 5 - Approves the expenditure of resources for own
budget exercising delegated
authority. Determines and provides authoritative advice on
integrated
multi-disciplinary marine research projects to be performed,
long-term service
commitments or resource commitment for new systems or
products.
D. Degree 5 - Approves contract research and other outside
assistance work using
internal or other funds for which authority has been
delegated.
E. Degree 5 - Forecasts requirements, prepares budget and
establishes detailed work
plans. Recommends overall divisional goals, objectives and
priorities. Develops
and implements uniform planning progress reporting and program
evaluation tools for
relevant and integrated/coordinated programs and multi-lateral
agreements.
F. Degree 5 - Coordinates the activities of the Services
with those of several other
elements of the Regional Science Sector, various relevant
programs activities of
other departments, provincial government, university and
international organizations
concerned and with requirements of industry and other users
and where differing
interests and priorities are involved.
|
|
|
Degree
|
G. Degree 4 - Develops and recommends uniform planning and
reporting tools for use
within the Regional Science Sector and internal administrative
procedures and
service guidelines for the Services Division.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - Authoritative recommendations and advice
affect the formulation of marine
resources development and environment protection legislation,
regulation of human
activities within the marine environment and departmental
policies, plans and
programs. Decisions and recommendations affect the initiation
or conduct of
regional multi-disciplinary research or survey programs,
oceanographic and
sub-surface marine climatological projects or the orientation
and work of major
scientific advisory and development committees for marine
resources management,
environment protection and development regulation.
B. Degree 5 -
(i) Degree 5 - Authoritative recommendations and advice have a
substantial long
and short-term effect on policies pertaining to fisheries and
habitat manage
ment, ocean dumping, offshore oil and gas exploration and
development, and
other industrial/commercial enterprises within the marine
environment.
(ii) Degree 4 - Recommendations and advice contribute to the
protection and
sustainable development and exploitation of marine resources
such as fish, oil,
gas and minerals.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 5 - Decisions and recommendations affect the
development strategies and
initiation of long- and short-term research and survey
programs to acquire
scientific data and information leading to a new and better
understanding of marine
science, more particularly, physical oceanography, marine
climate and predictions,
marine environment and resources and the effects of human
activities.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
- Regional Director General, Fisheries and Oceans,
Pacific
- Regional Director, Science
- Director, Physical and Chemical Sciences
- Director, Hydrography
- Director, Biological Sciences
*- Chief, Scientific Information (Analysis and Assessment
Svcs.) Div. PC-5 - Senior Marine Advisor BI-3
- Scientist, Physical Oceanography RES-2 - Clerical
SCY-2
- Term or other temporary Scientific
Support staff as applicable
* Bench-Mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 21
|
Level: 5
|
Descriptive Title: Senior Science Advisor, Renewables and New
Liquid Fuels
|
|
|
|
Reporting to the Director General, Office of Energy Research
and Development:
|
|
Advises, provides assessments and make
authoritative recommendations to the interdepartmental Panel on
Energy Research and Development on federal Research and
Development (R & D) programs and plans and on effective
dispersion of funds, future funding and other resource allocation
pertaining to renewable sources of energy and new liquid fuels.
Proposes research work, evaluates R & D projects and
proposals and makes recommendations for approval or rejection of
projects in such energy sources as active solar energy, wind,
geothermal and alcohol-fuel energy and coal liquification, heavy
oil extraction and upgrading, diesel engine emissions, the use
and production of hydrogen as a fuel and higher energy density
new batteries.
Plans, organizes and conducts studies,
information searches, analysis and assessments of the research
works and technological developments pertaining to renewable
sources of energy and new liquid fuels, and directs and
supervises subordinate science advisors. Develops reporting
schedules and requirements for the control and monitoring of
projects, reviews expenditures and budget, prepares reports and
makes recommendations to the Director General. Organizes and
conducts internal reviews of activities for the energy areas,
assesses effectiveness, and proposes changes to program content,
strategy proposals and funding. Conducts studies into technology
transfer, project results and benefit-cost analyses. Ensures the
development and maintenance of a comprehensive information base
for assessing R & D proposals, policy analysis and
development.
Participates in the development of energy R
& D policies, strategies and goals and review of the detailed
plans for the program pertaining to the relevant energy areas and
involving federal, provincial and industrial agencies under
various agreements. Invites provincial energy departments to
develop and submit strategies, provides advice or assistance, and
reviews and conducts discussions on strategies proposed by
federal and provincial agencies for common understanding and
priorities. Assesses proposed R & D plans and provides advice
to senior officials to maintaining an effective federal program.
Monitors technological advances, status of innovations, field
trials, demonstations, pilot tests, problems associated with
technologies being developed; assesses existing, developing and
latent technologies and identifies R & D, technical,
industrial and commercial opportunities, capabilities and needs,
and opportunities for technology transfer or preliminary R &
D work.
Acts as a technical advisor to the
interdepartmental Panel, ministers and senior officials on issues
related to energy R & D and other allied scientific
activities, represents the Office on committees developing
programs and provides assistance and interpretations concerning
technological developments, projects and documentation to energy
policy analysts in the policy formulation process and for
effective drafting of policy initiatives for the energy
areas.
Writes reports and scientific papers for policy
development proposals, supporting further R & D and
demonstrations or for publication and communication to scientific
community. Organizes and assists in the preparation of the
Office's submission documents and prepares briefing materials,
presentations, memoranda and discussions papers on energy
research and development programs.
Develops and maintains consultations with scientists, policy
analysts and other professionals in a national and international
context, and maintains leading-edge technology awareness of
developments, issues and organizations involved in new
initiatives. Represents the Office in Canada's activities in the
International Energy Agency, and provides information on Canada's
R & D programs. Monitors parliamentary and senate committees'
proceedings on energy-related matters.
|
Degree
|
Specifications
|
|
Kinds of Assignments
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - The objectives are stated by the Director
General in terms of the goals
and program objectives for the department with respect to the
federal program on
Energy Research and Development of new liquid fuels and
renewable sources of energy.
B. Degree 5 - Work is performed within the several
specialized subject areas of the
Energy Research and Development Program, and encompasses a
wide range of disciplines
and involves defining the federal position on R & D in a
diversity of renewable
sources of energy and new liquid fuels.
C. Degree 5 - Activities involve a broad spectrum of
scientific and policy formulation
duties and include evaluating and recommending major energy R
& D projects,
providing advice on policy, establishing priorities for
scientific work, recommending
allocation of funds, planning, assessing and monitoring
projects, supervising staff
engaged in scientific investigation, and coordinating relevant
energy R & D research
studies between the federal and provincial governments,
industry and universities.
D. Degree 5 - The work requires planning, coordinating,
monitoring and assessing the
R & D activities related to new liquid fuels and renewable
sources of energy and the
federal program on energy R & D, identifying opportunities
for the energy areas,
industrial and commercial capabilities, interests and
requirements and developing
from the results, new policies and strategies to meet Canada's
energy R & D
requirements.
|
|
Complexity of Work
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - The work requires developing sources,
organizing and coordinating the
collection and selection of information and data from a
variety of projects that are
developing new and innovative techniques. Intensive
investigations are required and
data produced are difficult to evaluate due to lack of
precedents. Latest research
information is not usually available in the published
literature and must be sought.
B. Degree 5 - Information and data which are obtained from
a diversity of projects and
sources are often not completely validatable. The work
involves being at the
forefront of R & D for renewable energy sources and new
liquid fuels.
C. Degree 5 - Information and data are obtained from many
energy-related studies and
projects conducted by various government departments and
agencies, industrial and
scientific organizations, and other government funded or
independent R & D work. The
information and data are characterized by high variability,
ambiguities and many
variables given the diversity of sources, different
objectives, interests and
priorities, environmental and economic particularities, new
and changing technology,
R & D opportunities and potential. Highly selective and
sound professional judgment
must be exercised in using the information to provide
objective assessments of
proposals and authoritative advice and recommendations for
effective and efficient
R & D strategies, policies, allocation and use of R &
D funds.
D. Degree 5 - Results of energy R & D work, proposal
assessments, resources potential
estimations, opportunity studies, strategy and benefit-cost
analysis involve complex
relationships between many variables which are difficult to
define and/or measure and
often conflicting as to the scientific theories, changing or
new technologies,
particular roles, perceptions and interests involved and the
most effective use of
resources.
E. Degree 5 - The work is affected by the energy-related
activities of senior scientists
in industry, universities and research organizations, other
government departments
and officials. Implications of those activities must be
considered in relation to
energy R & D policy and direction of the Canadian
efforts.
|
|
|
Degree
|
F. Degree 5 - Contacts are necessary with senior scientists
as the latest research
information is not usually available in published literature,
and with senior
officials from industry, universities and other governments at
both national and
international levels. Perception of the needs and directions
for energy R & D may
differ among scientists and officials of various government
departments and industry
and views must be harmonized to arrive at final
recommendations for the federal
government's role in R & D projects and funding.
G. Degree 5 - Work requires establishing new precedents for
energy R & D in areas where
new concepts and novel approaches are required in studies and
where theories and
data are incomplete or lacking.
H. Degree 5 - The work requires the application of an
advanced knowledge of the
principles, theories and practices of physics: heat transfer,
heat storage,
combustion and emissions, with a strong emphasis on energy
research and development
of renewable energy sources and new liquid fuels. A sound
understanding of
environmental economics, occupational health and safety issues
and environment
protection is also required.
|
|
Professional Responsibility
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - Results of research studies, recommendations
and advice are evaluated in
terms of their effectiveness toward the progress and
achievements of the policy and
program objectives set by the Director General for the federal
role in the areas of
R & D in new liquid fuels and renewable sources of energy,
and the scientific
support to be provided to the Interdepartmental Panel on
Energy R & D for its
recommendation to the Minister on policies, strategies,
programs and funding.
B. Degree 5 - Guidance is received from the Director General
largely on policy matters
and on general R & D strategy options and program
implications. Scientific guidance
can be obtained by discussions with senior researchers in the
energy sector.
C. Degree 5 - The work requires defining objectives,
strategies, developing conceptual
approaches, methods and guidelines in the establishment and
enhancement of the
government's energy R & D program, and in the conduct of
activities pertaining to
new liquid fuels and renewable energy sources.
D. Degree 5 - Assessments, recommendations and conclusions
of staff are reviewed for
their validity and effectiveness with respect to established
policies and the
resource limitations. Proposals, project results and study
findings or reports are
evaluated for effective contribution toward achievement of
program objectives.
E. Degree 5 - Major studies by other scientists are
continually reviewed for their
broad implications on the orientation of current R & D and
technologies in the
energy areas and their application to the overall federal
energy R & D program.
F. Degree 5 - Authoritative advice and recommendations on
technologies and associated
R & D problems pertaining to new liquid fuels and
renewable sources of energy are
given to officials and scientists in federal and provincial
governments, industry and
universities; and, to the Director General and the
interdepartmental Panel on
programs, plans, strategies and policy and on R & D
proposals, project
effectiveness, technological developments, technical and
industrial opportunities,
capabilities, initiatives and requirements and on effective
dispersion of funds.
Serves as an advisor to international and national
committees.
|
|
Management Responsibilities
|
4
|
A. Degree 3 - The work requires the direction and
supervision of a scientific staff of
subordinate advisors engaged in monitoring investigations,
studies and assessments
of R & D proposals, new technologies, and project progress
and effectiveness.
|
|
|
Degree
|
B. Degree 1 - Limited to the planning of the day to day use
of the office equipment and
supplies for own work.
C. Degree 4 - Evaluates proposals for, and recommends the
expenditure of energy R & D
funds to meet program objectives for a wide spectrum of
activities related to energy
R & D. Assesses requirements, develops plans and
recommends research projects to be
done with allocated funds.
D. Degree 4 - Selects and negotiates for specialized
assistance as required for studies
and assessments process (e.g., other scientists, government
researchers or
contractors).
E. Degree 4 - Coordinates and controls a diverse series of
R & D projects and
schedules, monitors progress and evaluates performance against
standards and makes
recommendations for modifications or termination to meet
program objectives.
F. Degree 5 - The work requires the co-ordination through
the conduct of investigation
and assessment studies and the monitoring of the progress of
energy-related R & D
activities or projects, in own and several other departments
or agencies involved
and where interest, purpose or objectives are different and
priorities conflicting.
G. Degree 4 - Develops, advises and recommends on reporting
schedules and requirements
for the administrative control and monitoring of the projects,
the effectiveness and
expenditures for implementation.
|
|
Impact of Recommendations
|
5
|
A. Degree 5 - Authoritative recommendations and advice
affect the development of the
federal energy R & D program. Decisions, advice,
appraisals and recommendations
concerning current state of development of new technologies,
projects and proposals
affect the initiation, continuation and conduct of major
energy related R & D
activities by the department, other departments and
agencies.
B. Degree 5 -
(i) Degree 5 - Authoritative recommendations, advice and
consultations concerning
R & D programs can have substantial contributory economic
and technological
effects on the activities and progress of energy-related
industrial and
commercial enterprises. New technologies spawn new enterprises
and change the
operation of existing ones.
(ii) Degree 5 - Results of assessments and investigations or
projects, and
authoritative advice and recommendations on R & D
projects, resource estimation
and development potential, affect the development of new
liquid fuels and
renewable sources of energy. Rate of advances or exploitation
is affected by
the results achieved by federally funded R & D.
(iii) Degree 2 - Information and result of
assessment work can contribute to the
regulatory control of potentially hazardous substances related
to new liquid
fuels.
(iv) Degree 4 - As part of the total assessment of energy
technologies, results of
the work can have a significant impact on occupational health
and safety aspects
of energy technologies directly related to the safety hazards
inherent to the
production of new liquid fuels such as alcohol, methanol.
C. Degree 5 - Decisions, advice and recommendations on R
& D proposals and projects
affect the initiation, continuation or orientation of
energy-related R & D work and
the current state of development of new technologies, and
shape the course of
research strategy and the rate of advancement of knowledge in
the areas concerned.
|
|
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Assistant Deputy Minister, Mineral and Energy Technology
Sector Director General, Office of Energy Research and
Development - Senior Science Advisor, Fossil Fuels
- Science Advisor, Fossil Fuels
- Senior Science Advisor, Conservation & Fusion
- Science Advisor, Conservation and Fusion
* - Senior Science Advisor, Renewables and New
Liquid Fuels PC-5
- Science Advisor Renewables PC-3
- Science Advisor, New Liquid Fuels PC-3
* Bench Mark Position
|
|