Patent Office practice regarding multiple examiner's requisitions

September 2, 2003 — The Patent Office takes the position that a single Examiner's Report may contain more than one separate requisition and that failure to reply in good faith to any one of the requisitions will result in the application being deemed to be abandoned pursuant to paragraph 73(1)(a) of the Patent Act. For example, an Examiner's Report may contain a requisition under subsection 30(2) of the Patent Rules concerning defects in the application and, in addition, contain one or more separate requisitions under:

• section 29 of the Patent Rules (regarding information or documents in respect of applications for a patent filed in or for any country describing the same invention in the application being examined),
  
  
• section 89 of the Patent Rules (regarding the filing of a certified copy of the previously regularly filed application and a certification of the actual date of its filing) or
  
  
• section 104.1 of the Patent Rules (regarding the inclusion of the date of the original deposit of biological material with an international depositary authority in the description of the application).

In the case of an Examiner's report containing such multiple requisitions, in order to avoid abandonment pursuant to paragraph 73(1)(a) of the Patent Act, the response to the Report must include a reply in good faith to each requisition. Responses that are completely silent in respect of any of the requisitions in the Report will not be considered as replying in good faith to that particular requisition and the application will be deemed to be abandoned. Details of this Patent Office Practice are found in sections 19.07.02 and 19.07.03 of the new chapter of 19 of the Manual of Patent Office Practice (M.O.P.O.P.).