![]() ![]() |
Français | Contact Us | Help | Search | Canada Site | ||||
AAFC Online | Links | Newsroom | What's New | Site Index |
PFRA Online | Staff | Programs & Services | Offices |
Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
Download PDF version (348KB) | ![]() |
Evaluation of Treatment SystemsWhy is in-house water treatment necessary?Water used for drinking and household use, especially water from a surface water supply, must be treated before it is used so it is safe and aesthetically pleasing. Some existing in-house water treatment systems currently in use on Saskatchewan farms were monitored to determine their effectiveness as part of the research conducted under the Canada-Saskatchewan Agriculture Green Plan Agreement. This part of the research focused on existing in-house filtration and disinfection systems, and their ability to remove dissolved organic carbon (DOC), colour and turbidity from the water. This publication provides:
Farm water supplies on the Prairies may have high concentrations of organic matter, high turbidity and be highly coloured. These conditions may degrade water quality so that the water is not safe or aesthetically pleasing for household use, including drinking. The Water Quality Matters information sheets describe how these factors affect water quality and drinking water safety. What types of in-house treatment systems are commonly used?In-house water treatment refers to any treatment technology that is used by individuals within their homes. Common in-house systems used on farms in the Prairies for treating surface water supplies include:
Other systems include:
Two common types of in-house treatment systems were studied:
How well did the in-house systems work?PRIMARY TREATMENT SYSTEM: GAC, and Softener/Chlorine DisinfectionRandomly-selected in-house water treatment systems that consisted of sand filters and granular activated carbon (GAC) filters (along with water softeners and chlorine disinfection units) were monitored. Results (Table 1) showed they did not adequately treat water to produce safe and acceptable drinking or bathing water. The primary treatment systems were not effective in reducing DOC, colour or turbidity. This ineffectiveness was largely due to the fact that the systems were not maintained appropriately. In particular, the carbon in the GAC filters was not replaced when it was exhausted. The concentrations of DOC and turbidity were not reduced to target levels specified in the study for safe drinking water (<5 mg/L for DOC, and <1 NTU for turbidity). Only in one household did the treatment system reduce the colour of the water enough to meet the target (<15 TCU), probably because the source water was not highly coloured. The effectiveness of the water treatment systems could have been improved if the carbon media was replaced frequently.
Table 1: Performance of Primary Treatment Systems in Reducing DOC, Colour and Turbidity
NOTE: shaded values are within the desired goals
Add-on components to primary treatment systems: (ro and distillation)Add-on components to primary treatment systems, including RO and distillation units, are used on farms to produce high quality cooking and drinking water at the kitchen tap. Both kitchen sink processes that were studied, including reverse osmosis (RO) and distillation, supplied high quality and safe drinking water that met the objectives set for DOC, colour and turbidity (Table 2). The add-on systems removed 89% to 100% of the DOC, colour and turbidity from the water. When properly operated and maintained, these units are also designed to produce water free of microbial contamination. Table 2: Performance of Add-on Components in Reducing DOC, Colour, and Turbidity
How much do in-house systems cost?The cost of a typical primary treatment system component, (sand filter, GAC filter, chlorinator, softener) is about $500 to $1000 each. Similarly, kitchen sink RO or distillation units cost about $500 to $1000 each. While the primary treatment systems are designed to supply enough water for an entire household's needs, the kitchen sink units are designed to produce only 25 to 45 L (6 to 10 gallons) per day. What operation & maintenance is required for in-house systems?Equipment Use
Water Quality Testing
Are there any limitations to using in-house treatment systems?
The bigger pictureThe best way to produce safe drinking water is to use a MULTIPLE BARRIER APPROACH where a number of different stages of treatment, or "barriers", are used to improve water quality. Ideally, a multiple barrier system will reduce particulate and dissolved matter before the water is disinfected. One example of a multiple barrier system would include sand filtration, followed by carbon filtration and chlorination, followed in turn by a kitchen tap unit to produce drinking and cooking water. Such units include a chlorine tolerant kitchen sink RO or nanofilter (NF) membrane, or a distiller. (For more information on the multiple barrier approach, please refer to the Water Quality Matters publication "Approaches to Water Treatment".) The limited studies conducted on randomly-selected farms as part of this research showed that GAC systems used alone or in combination with softeners or chlorinators were not effective in treating organic-rich surface water to produce safe and aesthetically pleasing drinking water. The systems were ineffective largely because they were not maintained properly. Increased replacement of carbon media would have improved the effectiveness of the primary treatment system. (The ability of GAC systems to reduce levels of DOC is addressed in the Water Quality Matters publication "Water Treatment Trailer.") However, RO and distillation units, designed to provide small amounts of water at the kitchen tap, were capable of producing high quality drinking water. Further research and development is needed:
For further information on rural Prairie water quality and treatment technology:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|