The Estimates Documents
The Estimates of the Government of Canada are structured in several parts. Beginning with an overview of total government spending in Part I, the documents become increasingly more specific. Part II outlines spending according to departments, agencies and programs and contains the proposed wording of the conditions governing spending which Parliament will be asked to approve. The previous Part III of the Estimates has been split into two documents: a spring report "A Report on Plans and Priorities" and a fall report "Departmental Performance Report".
A Report on Plans and Priorities provides additional detail on each department and its programs primarily in terms of more strategically oriented planning and results information with a focus on outcomes.
The Departmental Performance Report provides a focus on results-based accountability by reporting on accomplishments achieved against the performance expectations and results commitments as set out in the spring Report on Plans and Priorities.
© Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada 1999
Available in Canada through
Associated Bookstore and other booksellers
or by mail from
Publications Development and Marketing Group
Ottawa, Canada K1A 0S9
Catalogue No. BT31-2/1999-III-13
ISBN 0-660-60071-4
RCMP Public
Complaints Commission
1999-2000
Estimates
A Report on Plans and Priorities
Approved
___________________________________
Hon. Lawrence MacAulay, P.C., M.P.
Solicitor General of Canada
Table of Contents
Section I : Messages
A. Chair's Message
B. Management Representation Statement
Section II: RCMP Public Complaints Commission Overview
A. Mandate, Role and Responsibilities
B. Objective
C. Operating Environment
D. Financial Spending Plan
Section III: RCMP Public Complaints Commission Plans, Priorities, Strategies and Expected Results
A. Summary of Priorities and Expected Results
B. Business Line Plans
C. Consolidated Reporting
Section IV : Supplementary Information
Index
Section I: Messages
Chair's Message
While looking ahead to future fiscal years, I cannot help but remark on the extraordinary year the Commission has just come through. In the context of celebrating its 10-year anniversary, the Commission has had an unprecedented amount of public and media attention and, operationally speaking, has never been busier.
Looking to the future then, my first priority is to continue with the restructuring of the Commission to more efficiently process complaints and reviews and to eliminate the backlog of review cases that has accumulated. One dimension of the restructuring initiative involves the implementation of less formal and more efficient means of resolving complaints against members of the RCMP. Other priority activities include completing the APEC public inquiry and carrying out 2 public interest investigations and 8 other investigations.
Significant steps were taken with respect to the restructuring initiative in spite of unprecedented operational demands. The remaining work should be completed in the coming year. The backlog of review cases has been substantially attacked and, with the appointment of a Vice-Chair whose efforts will focus on backlog elimination, major progress is forecast for the next fiscal year.
B. Management Representation Statement
MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATION
Report on Plans and Priorities 1999-2000
I submit, for tabling in Parliament, the 1999-2000 Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) for the RCMP Public Complaints Commission.
To the best of my knowledge the information:
- Accurately portrays the Commission's mandate, plans, priorities, strategies and expected key results of the organization.
- Is consistent with the disclosure principles contained in the Guidelines for Preparing a Report on Plans and Priorities.
- Is comprehensive and accurate.
- Is based on sound underlying Commission information and management systems.
I am satisfied as to the quality assurance processes and procedures used for the RPP's production.
The planning and reporting structure on which this document is based has been approved by Treasury Board Ministers and is the basis for accountability for the results achieved with the resources and authorities provided.
Name: __________________________________
Date:________________________________________ |
Section II: RCMP Public Complaints Commission Overview
A. Mandate, Role and Responsibilities
Mandate
The mandate of the Commission is set out in Part VII of the RCMP Act. Its main activities are:
- receiving complaints from the public;
- reviewing the RCMP disposition of complaints when requested to do so by complainants who are not satisfied with the RCMP's disposition of their complaints; and
- conducting investigations and hearings.
Role and Responsibilities
The fundamental role of the RCMP Public Complaints Commission is to contribute to the enhancement of public confidence in the policing activities of the RCMP. It does this by providing, at the request of complainants, independent review of the RCMP's disposition of complaints and by making recommendations to the Commissioner of the RCMP and to the Solicitor General.
Members of the public may make complaints about the conduct of members of the RCMP to: the Public Complaints Commission; directly to the RCMP; or, to the provincial authority responsible for policing. The Chair of the Commission may also initiate a complaint if she considers that there are reasonable grounds to do so. Complaints are normally sent first to the RCMP for investigation. The Commissioner of the RCMP is required to report the results of the investigation to the complainant. If the complainant is not satisfied with the RCMP report or disposition of the complaint, he/she may ask for a review by the Commission, in which case:
- The Commission conducts a review of the investigation, which may include a request to the RCMP for further investigation if the original investigation seems to be incomplete or inadequate;
- The Commission Chair may initiate her own investigation; or
- The Commission Chair may establish a public hearing.
If the Chair of the Commission is satisfied with the RCMP's disposition of a complaint, the Chair reports this finding in writing to the complainant, the RCMP members involved, the Commissioner of the RCMP and the Solicitor General.
If the Chair of the Commission is not satisfied, she sends an interim report to the Commissioner of the RCMP and to the Solicitor General. This report is treated as follows:
- the Commissioner of the RCMP informs the Chair and the Solicitor General in writing of any action to be taken in response to the Chair's findings and recommendations, including the rationale for decisions not to take any action; and following this
- The Chair prepares a final report that includes the text of the Commissioner's response, as well as the Chair's final recommendations, and sends it to the complainant, the RCMP members involved, the Commissioner of the RCMP and to the Solicitor General.
B. Objective
To provide the public with an opportunity to make complaints regarding the conduct of members of the RCMP in the performance of their duties, and to have the RCMP disposition of those complaints reviewed by an external body in an independent and impartial manner.
C. Operating Environment
The Commission is an agency of the federal government, distinct and independent from the RCMP. It reports to Parliament through the Solicitor General of Canada; however, the Solicitor General has no involvement in the operations of the Commission.
As a neutral third party, the Commission is, and must be seen to be, impartial and fair in its dealings with both complainants and RCMP members complained about. When reviewing the RCMP's disposition of a complaint, the Commission does not act as an advocate for either the complainant or RCMP members. Rather its role is to inquire into complaints independently and impartially to arrive at objective conclusions based on the information provided by complainants and the RCMP.
Expectations of the Commission are high. Both complainants and members of the RCMP have expressed their view to the Commission that the processing time should be shorter. In other words, they expect their cases to be reviewed more expeditiously.
The APEC hearing in Vancouver and the public interest investigation in New Brunswick have elevated the Commission's public profile, with the result that the Commission is receiving an unprecedented number of enquiries and requests for information.
D. Financial Spending Plan
(thousands of dollars) |
Forecast Spending 1998-1999 1 |
Planned Spending 1999-2000 |
Planned Spending 2000-2001 |
Planned Spending 2001-2002 |
Gross Program Spending |
|
|
|
|
Receipt and review of public complaints |
3,493 |
4,878 |
4,058 |
3,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Program Spending |
|
|
|
|
Plus: Cost of services provided by other Departments |
665 |
429 |
429 |
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cost of the Agency |
4,158 |
5,307 |
4,487 |
4,157 |
1 Reflects best forecast of total planned spending to the end of the fiscal year.
Section III: Plans, Priorities, Strategies and Expected Results
A. Summary of Priorities and Expected Results
Chart of Key Results Commitments
to provide Canadians with |
to be demonstrated by |
a contribution to a safe and secure society through independent and impartial review of public complaints against the RCMP |
|
|
|
|
|
B. Business Line Plans
Planned Spending
(thousands of dollars) |
Forecast Spending 1998-1999 |
Planned Spending 1999-2000 |
Planned Spending 2000-2001 |
Planned Spending 2001-2002 |
Net Expenditures |
3,493 |
4,878 |
4,058 |
3,728 |
PRIORITY
- Ensure that the receipt and review of complaints are dealt with in a timely and efficient fashion
STRATEGIES
- Restructure the Commission for more effective use of its resources
- Develop a more expeditious system of review of complaints
- Eliminate the backlog of requests for review
- Use informal resolution techniques where appropriate
- Improve quality of data in the complaints tracking database to provide more reliable and consistent statistics
- Enhance the effectiveness of Commission members in the conduct of public hearings
- Reduce the time and cost of public hearings
EXPECTED RESULTS
- four-month (120 days) turn-around time by the end of the 2000-2001 fiscal year in cases where the Chair is satisfied with the RCMP disposition of the complaint;
- elimination of the backlog before the end of the 2000-2001 fiscal year;
- a more streamlined review process in place before the end of the 1999-2000 fiscal year;
- training of Commission members in adjudicative processes to be completed by the end of the 1999-2000 fiscal year;
- revision of the hearing and registrar's manuals;
- development of appropriate measures of Commission effectiveness; and
- development of an indicator of client satisfaction with the review process.
PRIORITY
- Develop an effective communications strategy to reach and engage Canadians
STRATEGIES
- Hire a communications specialist
- Implement a communications strategy
- Determine effectiveness of the communications strategy
EXPECTED RESULTS
- use of community and ethnic newspapers to disseminate information about the Commission;
- distribution of brochures to target audiences;
- client knowledge of Commission in targeted communities, and
- public speeches by the Chair, Commission members and the Executive Director.
Consolidated Reporting
Year 2000 readiness
The Commission's information technology systems are provided by the Department of the Solicitor General of Canada on a cost-shared basis. The Department does not have any government-wide mission critical systems (GWMCS). It has a modern LAN based infrastructure based on commercial or government shared systems that are either already Year 2000 compliant or will be prior to the Year 2000. Its corporate systems, such as those for finance, human resources and information management are being upgraded or replaced with identified Year 2000 compliant government shared systems.
Section IV: Supplementary Information
Table 1 : Spending Authorities
Personnel Information
Table 2.1 : Organization Structure
Table 2.2 : Planned Full Time Equivalents (FTE) by Program/Business Line
Additional Financial Information
Table 3 : Commission Summary of Standard Objects of Expenditure
Table 4 : Commission Resources for the Estimates Year
Table5 : Net Cost of Program for 1999-2000
Other Information
Table 6 : Statute
Table 7 : References
Table 1: Spending Authorities - Summary Part II of the Estimates
Vote |
(thousands of dollars) |
1999-2000 Main Estimates |
1998-1999 Main Estimates |
|
RCMP Public Complaints Commission |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
Program expenditures |
4,520 |
3,123 |
(S) |
Contributions to employee benefit plans |
358 |
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Agency |
4,878 |
3,493 |
Personnel Information
Table 2.1: Organization Structure
Table 2.2: Planned Full Time Equivalents (FTE) by Program and Business Line
|
Planned 1998-1999 |
Planned 1999-2000 |
Planned 2000-2001 |
Planned 2001-2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
34 |
34 |
34 |
34 |
Additional Financial Information
Table 3: Commission Summary of Standard Objects of Expenditure
($ thousands) |
Forecast Spending 1998-1999 |
Planned Spending 1999-2000 |
Planned Spending 2000-2001 |
Planned Spending 2001-2002 |
Personnel |
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages |
1,887 |
1,790 |
1,790 |
1,790 |
Contributions to employee benefit plans |
370 |
358 |
358 |
358 |
|
2,257 |
2,148 |
2,148 |
2,148 |
Goods and services |
|
|
|
|
Transportation and communications |
319 |
514 |
125 |
125 |
Information |
157 |
118 |
100 |
80 |
Professional and special services |
1,871 |
1,697 |
1,475 |
1,165 |
Rentals |
286 |
131 |
35 |
35 |
Purchased repair and maintenance |
75 |
20 |
25 |
25 |
Utilities, materials and supplies |
88 |
170 |
70 |
70 |
Minor capital |
100 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
|
2,896 |
2,730 |
1,910 |
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net budgetary expenditures |
5,153 |
4,878 |
4,058 |
3,728 |
Table 4: Commission Resources for the Estimates Year
![Image Image](/web/20060303003224im_/http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/app/ImageRepository/1/Reports/rpp_99_00_01t.gif)
Table 5: Net Cost of Program for 1999-2000
($ thousands) |
|
Total |
Gross Planned Spending |
|
4,878 |
Plus: |
|
|
Services Received without Charge |
|
|
-Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) |
331 |
|
-Contributions covering employer's share of insurance premiums and costs paid by TBS |
98 |
|
-Employee compensation payments provided by Human Resources Canada |
0 |
|
Subtotal Services Received without Charge |
|
429 |
Net Cost of Program |
|
5,307 |
Other information
Table 6: Statute
The RCMP Public Complaints Commission shares responsibility with the RCMP for carrying out the provisions of:
Part VII, Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act R.S., c. R-10, Part VII
In addition, the RCMP Public Complaints Commission reports to Parliament on:
Parts VI and VII, Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act R.S., c. R-10, Part VI, Part VII
Table 7: References
Head Office |
Publications |
P.O. Box 3423 Station "D" Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6L4
(613) 952-1471 1-800-267-6637 |
Annual Reports 1988-1989 to 1997-1998
RCMP Act (Commission consolidation) March 1990 |
|
|
Western Region |
|
7337 137 Street Suite 102 Surrey, British Columbia V6Z 2L2
(604) 501-4080 1-800-665-6878 |
|
Index
A |
R |
Authorities, 9 |
RCMP, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 15 |
|
Resources for estimate year, 13 |
C |
Role and responsibilities, 3 |
Communications, 7 |
|
Chair, 1, 3, 4, 7, 10 |
S |
|
Statute, 15 |
E |
Strategic objectives, 6-7 |
Expected results, 6-7 |
Strategies |
|
Communications, 7 |
F |
Receipt and review of complaints, 6 |
FTE, 11 |
|
H |
T |
Human resources, 14 |
TBS, 14 |
|
|
M |
V |
Management representation, 2 |
Vice-Chair, 1, 10 |
Mandate, 3 |
|
|
|
N |
|
Net cost, 5, 13, 14 |
|
|
|
O |
|
Objective, 4 |
|
Offices, 15 |
|
Operating Environment, 4 |
|
Organization structure, 10 |
|
|
|
P |
|
Personnel, 10 |
|
Plan |
|
Spending plan, 5 |
|
Key plans, 6-7 |
|
Publications, 15 |
|
Public Works and Government Services Canada, 14 |
|