Conduct Complaints

TABLE OF CONTENTS

• Informal Resolution
• Status Reports
• Time Limits
• Chair's Review of the Complaint

Anybody, whether they are a civilian or a member of the military and whether or not they were affected, may complain about the conduct of Military Police in the performance of "policing duties or functions."

The Complaints about the Conduct of Members of the Military Police Regulations state that any of the following constitute "policing duties or functions":

• the conduct of an investigation;
• the rendering of assistance to the public;
• the execution of a warrant or another judicial process;
• the handling of evidence;
• the laying of a charge;
• attendance at a judicial proceeding;
• the enforcement of laws;
• responding to a complaint; and
• the arrest or custody of a person.

Under the legislation, the Provost Marshal is responsible for dealing with conduct complaints. The Commission monitors the Provost Marshal's handling and disposition of these complaints.
TOP

Informal Resolution

The legislation encourages the Provost Marshal to attempt, if appropriate and consistent with the regulations, and with the consent of both sides, to resolve conduct complaints in an informal manner.

If a complaint is informal, the Provost Marshal is required to prepare a written report of the details, to be signed by both sides, and provide notice of the informal resolution to the Chair of the Commission.
TOP

Status Reports

If the Provost Marshal's examination and/or investigation of a conduct complaint is not completed within 60 days, the Provost Marshal must provide a status report to both sides, and every 30 days thereafter, until the investigation is completed and the results have been reported to all concerned.
TOP

Time Limits

Normally, a complaint must be filed within one year of the incident in question. However, at the request of the complainant, the Chair can decide if it is reasonable in the circumstances to extend the time limit.

This exception does not apply to complaints about incidents that occurred before the Commission started operation on December 1, 1999. Complaints about incidents before that date should be directed to the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal, who will deal with them according to the procedures in effect prior to the existence of the Commission.
TOP

Chair's Review of the Complaint

After completing the investigation of a conduct complaint, the Provost Marshal must provide a written report of the findings to both sides.

If a complainant is not satisfied with the Provost Marshal's findings, he or she can ask the Commission to review the complaint. If so, the Commission is required to provide status reports as noted above.

This provision for review by the Commission also applies to conduct complaints that may be dismissed by the Provost Marshal on the grounds the complaint is "frivolous, vexatious, or made in bad faith," or that the complaint would be dealt with more appropriately under another legislated procedure.