XI: Chairperson's Conclusion

The Chairperson is acutely aware of the turmoil these complaints, and the investigation of them by the Complaints Commission, have had in the lives of many members of the Military Police and, indeed, others in the Canadian Forces, their spouses and families.

The incident that led to three investigations by the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service seemed minor and inconsequential. Some have even used the word "petty" to describe it. Nevertheless, these investigations were undertaken and have had serious consequences that seem totally out of proportion to the original event.

When subjects of a police investigation perceive that an injustice has been committed or that an investigation has not been thoroughly conducted, accurately reported and free from any bias, it is imperative that they be able to avail themselves of recourse mechanisms. That is exactly what Lieutenant-Colonel Battista and Major Wight have done in this case. That is exactly what anyone must be able to do in similar circumstances. And that is exactly what the Military Police Complaints Commission was created to address. No one should be denied the free exercise of this right.

The considerable resources spent by both the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service and the Military Police Complaints Commission in investigating service/criminal offences and conduct complaints, respectively, will have been worth the investment if they lead to positive outcomes for change and development. In this regard, the Chairperson is pleased with the many positive results of the Complaints Commission investigation of these complaints. At the same time, it is evident that much remains to be done.

On the one hand, the Chairperson sees a number of positive outcomes such as the greater use of discretion by Canadian Forces National Investigation Service investigators and enhanced training in the areas of report writing, professional development and, hopefully, in the use of these discretionary powers.

On the other hand, much remains to be done in fostering an appreciation for situations presenting a conflict of interest or the reasonable apprehension of bias. Efforts are still required towards the objective of balancing appropriately the independence of the Military Police and their investigations and the legitimate input from the Chain of Command.

The Chairperson is hopeful that her Final Report with respect to these complaints will provide some closure for complainants and subjects of complaint. Much remains to be done. By working cooperatively and retaining an optimistic outlook, we can all make a difference in the continuing professional development of the Military Police organization.