The Federal Prosecution Service
DESKBOOK
[ Previous | Table of Contents | Next ]
Part IV
LITIGATION FRAMEWORK
Chapter 14
Table of Contents
14.1 INTRODUCTION
14.2 STATEMENT OF ALTERNATIVE MEASURES POLICY
14.2.1 General Principles
14.2.2 Preconditions to Diversion
14.3 GUIDELINES FOR APPLICATION OF POLICY
14.3.1 The Circumstances of the Offender
14.3.2 The Nature of the Offence
14.3.3 The Circumstances of the Offence
14.4 SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE ALTERNATIVE MEASURES
PROGRAM
14.5 FAILURE TO COMPLETE THE ALTERNATIVE MEASURES PROGRAM
14.6 EXTRAJUDICIAL MEASURES UNDER THE YCJA
14.6.1
Introduction
14.6.2
Extrajudicial Measures: Options for Crown counsel
14.6.2.1
Withdrawal of the charge
14.6.2.2 Referral
to a community program or agency
14.6.2.3
Crown caution
14.6.2.4
Extrajudicial sanctions
14.6.3 General
Principles for the Use of Extrajudicial Measures
14.6.4
Determining Whether an Extrajudicial Measure Would Be Adequate to Hold
a Young Person Accountable
14.6.5
Factors related to the seriousness of the offence, and the history of previous
offences or any other aggravating circumstances
14.6.6
Choosing the Appropriate Extrajudicial Measure
14.6.6.1 Crown cautions:
specific considerations
14.6.6.2 Extrajudicial sanctions: specific
considerations
14.7 THE CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT,
1999
14.8 APPENDIX A ATTORNEY'S GENERAL ORDER
14.9 APPENDIX B SCHEDULE A ALTERNATIVE MEASURES (DIVERSION) PROGRAMS
14.9.1
APPENDIX C ATTORNEY’S GENERAL ORDER: CROWN CAUTIONS FOR
YOUNG PERSONS
14.9.2
APPENDIX D CROWN CAUTION LETTERS
14.9.3 APPENDIX E Notice to Parent
or Guardian
14.9.4 APPENDIX F ATTORNEY’S GENERAL ORDER
14.9.5
APPENDIX G Extrajudicial sanctions under the YCJA
14 ALTERNATIVE AND EXTRAJUDICIAL MEASURES
14.1 Introduction
Not every individual alleged to have committed an offence need be prosecuted.
Section 717 of the Criminal Code recognizes that where it is not
inconsistent with the protection of society, Crown counsel can exercise
their discretion to deal with the individual by “alternative measures,” (or “diversion,” as
it is sometimes known). In such circumstances, Crown counsel refers the
offender to an individual or agency with the intention of reaching an
agreement to deal with the offence outside the judicial process. In appropriate
cases, alternative measures may provide greater benefit to the offender,
the victim, and society than can the formal criminal process. Indeed,
the fundamental principle underlying alternative measures is that criminal
proceedings should be used with restraint and only when other less intrusive
measures have failed or would be inappropriate. This allows the courts
to devote their resources to addressing more serious crime.
The object of these alternative measures programs for adults is to have
the offender accept responsibility for the offence without going to trial.
Participation in an alternative measures program is voluntary; the offender
cannot be forced into it. If the offender complies with the diversion
agreement, the Crown relinquishes its right to prosecute the offender
for the offence.
Diversion can occur before or after a charge is laid1.
This policy generally applies after a charge has been laid, except in
provinces where
pre-charge screening takes place, where it will apply both pre-charge
and post-charge. The policy applies to both adults and young offenders.
While many of the principles in this alternative measures policy are
relevant to both adults and young persons, important differences exist
between Alternative Measures for Adults and Extrajudicial Measures for
young persons under the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Adult Alternative
Measures do not apply to young persons. To distinguish between the options
available to adults from those available to young persons, the terms “alternative
measures” and “diversion” are used throughout this
policy to refer to adult offenders; “extrajudicial
measures” is used in association with young persons.
14.2 Statement of Alternative Measures Policy
14.2.1 General Principles
Diversion is not intended to be available for every offender and every
offence. Rather, it is an acknowledgement that in some cases, because
of the nature and circumstances of the offence and the offender, the
public interest would be better served by a resolution outside of the
traditional criminal process. Generally, it will be most suitable for
younger adult offenders and those with no criminal record, who have committed
minor offences.
14.2.2 Preconditions to Diversion
Where Crown counsel is considering exercising the discretion to divert
an alleged offender, Crown counsel must be satisfied that the following
preconditions have been met:
- the case meets the criteria in the "Decision to Prosecute" policy2 (ss.
717(1)(f) and (g), Criminal Code);
- the offender has been advised of his or her right to counsel and
is aware that he or she does not have to accept diversion (ss. 717(1)(c)
and (d), Criminal Code);
- the offender is willing to acknowledge
responsibility for his or her actions (s. 717(1)(e), Criminal Code);
- a
program described in s. 717(1)(a) of the Criminal Code exists
for which this particular offender would be eligible;
- appropriate consultation has been undertaken, where necessary,
with victims, investigating authorities3 or
other interested parties, and diversion would be in the interests of
society, the offender and the victim (s. 717(1)(b), Criminal Code).
- Crown counsel should note that the statutory pre-conditions
to alternative measures for adults in s. 717 of the Criminal Code are
virtually identical to the pre-conditions for the use of extrajudicial
sanctions for young persons under s. 10(2) of the YCJA.
14.3 Guidelines for Application of Policy
14.3.1 The Circumstances of the Offender
The policy is aimed generally at offenders who have not violated the
criminal law previously, and are unlikely to do so in the near future.
Crown counsel should consider the following factors in assessing an offender's
suitability:
- whether the offender has previously violated the criminal
law (including convictions, discharges or diversions) and if so, the
date and nature of the violations;
- the offender's remorse (including for example, whether the
offender has agreed to fairly compensate any victim(s));
- whether the offender poses a risk to the community; and
- whether the offender is facing other charges.
14.3.2 The Nature of the Offence
As indicated above, the policy is directed at "minor" offences. "Minor" offences
include offences that are objectively less serious, or potentially serious
offences committed in a less serious way. The following factors are relevant
in determining seriousness:
- whether the offence is summary or indictable;
- whether a minimum punishment is prescribed;
- whether the offence usually results in a sentence exceeding
three months imprisonment (“imprisonment” includes a conditional
sentence of imprisonment served in the community);
- the potential or actual harm to the victims(s) or society
in general.
Crown counsel must also ascertain whether the offence is the subject
of other policies, which would affect the decision to divert, eg. "Spousal
Violence"4, "Aboriginal Law Issues"5, "Impaired
Driving Cases"6, "Firearms and Other Offensive Weapons7".
These policies should also be considered regarding the use of extrajudicial
measures under the YCJA.
14.3.3 The Circumstances of the Offence
Existence of any of the following circumstances will preclude diversion:
- the offence involved the use of, or threatened use of, violence
reasonably likely to result in harm that is more than merely transient
or trifling in nature;
- a weapon was used or threatened to be used in the commission
of the offence;
- the offence affected the sexual integrity of a person;
- the offence had a serious impact upon the victim (physical,
psychological or financial);
- the conduct demonstrated sophisticated planning (for example,
the offence was part of an ongoing criminal enterprise);
- a person trafficked in a controlled substance or possessed
the substance for the purposes of trafficking, in or near a school,
on or near school grounds or in or near any public place usually frequented
by persons under the age of 18 years;
- a person trafficked in a controlled substance, or possessed
the substance for the purpose of trafficking, to a person under the
age of 18 years;
- a person used a person under the age of 18 years to commit
a drug offence; and
- the motivation for committing a drug offence was primarily
profit8.
14.4 Successful Completion of the Alternative Measures
Program
If the offender successfully completes the diversion program, the criminal
charge shall be withdrawn or stayed and not re-instituted. If the criminal
charge was already withdrawn or stayed before the offender was diverted,
the charge shall not be re-instituted. If charges were not laid before
the offender was diverted, Crown counsel shall not institute or proceed
with those charges.
14.5 Failure to Complete the Alternative
Measures Program
If the offender fails to complete the program, criminal proceedings
may be instituted or re-instituted. However, before doing so, Crown counsel
should determine why the program was not completed and assess the appropriateness
of instituting or re-instituting proceedings in light of those facts.
The decision to institute or re-institute proceedings will require the
authorization of the FPS Director or Regional Director.
14.6 Extrajudicial Measures Under the YCJA
14.6.1 Introduction The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) came into force
on April 1, 2003. It replaced the Young Offenders Act (YOA).
A major objective of the YCJA is to reduce the use of the youth
court through the increased use of extrajudicial measures. Parliament
was concerned about the over-use of the youth court for less serious
charges and concluded that many charges could be dealt with more quickly
and effectively through extrajudicial measures. “Extrajudicial
measures” are defined in s. 2 of the Act as measures other
than judicial proceedings used to deal with a young person alleged to
have committed an offence. Extrajudicial measures include “extrajudicial
sanctions,” which are defined in s. 2 of the Act to be those
set out in s. 10 of the Act.
The YCJA is significantly different from the YOA regarding
non-court responses to alleged offences by young persons. The YOA permitted
the use of alternative measures but provided little direction as to the
appropriate use of alternative measures, the types of measures and their
objectives. In contrast, the YCJA provides principles to guide
decisions regarding the use of extrajudicial measures, sets out objectives
for extrajudicial measures, and identifies specific types of extrajudicial
measures.
Crown counsel have a key role in ensuring that Parliament achieves its
objective of reducing the use of the youth court, where appropriate.
Counsel should be mindful of their prosecutorial duties in light of the
requirements and considerations in Part 1 of the YCJA (sections
4-12).
14.6.2 Extrajudicial Measures: Options for
Crown counsel If a pre-charge screening program is in place in the jurisdiction, Crown
counsel can advise the police that they can exercise one of the options
available to them under s. 6 of the Act: take no further action;
issue a warning or police caution; refer the young person to a community
program or agency, with the consent of the young person; or refer the
young person to an extrajudicial sanctions program.
If a pre-charge screening program is not in place, Crown counsel have
the following options once the police forward the file to the Crown:
14.6.2.1 Withdrawal of the charge
Crown counsel may determine that, although there is sufficient evidence
to proceed with a prosecution of the charge, withdrawal of the charge
is appropriate. It may be clear, for example, that after considering
the principles and objectives in sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Act, and
the factors related to the seriousness of the offence, discussed below,
the process of apprehension, detention and charging has been a sufficient
response from the youth criminal justice system, and no further action
is required. Crown counsel should also refer in this regard to the factors
listed in the Decision to Prosecute policy.9
14.6.2.2 Referral to a community program
or agency A referral to a community program or agency, with the consent of the
young person, may be appropriate in cases where it is clear that the
young person needs assistance with a problem that may have contributed
to the commission of the offence. Rather than prosecuting the young person
for a minor offence, Crown counsel may conclude that the matter can be
addressed more appropriately outside of the criminal justice system and
a referral can be made to the appropriate program or agency. For example,
a young person who has committed a minor offence may require help from
a substance abuse program. While the Act does not expressly codify
this referral power for prosecutors, as it does for the police, it is
within the Crown’s discretion to make such referrals. Prior to
making such referrals, however, Crown counsel may wish to consult individuals
and experts who have relevant information about existing community programs.
14.6.2.3 Crown caution Section 8 of the Act states that the Attorney General may establish
a program authorizing prosecutors to administer cautions to young persons
instead of starting or continuing judicial proceedings under the YCJA.
The Attorney General of Canada formally established a program of Crown
cautions for young persons in April 2003. The Attorney General’s
order states that federal prosecutors are to consider the use of Crown
cautions for young persons in relation to minor offences. The order is
attached as Appendix C.
A Crown caution is a formal warning from the prosecutor that, although
there are sufficient grounds to prosecute the offence, the prosecutor
will not be proceeding with the charge. The caution advises the young
person to avoid involvement in crime in the future.
While a Crown caution can be provided verbally to the young person by
the prosecutor, a Crown caution letter should also be provided to the
young person. A notice to the parent or guardian that the young person
has been cautioned, as well as a copy of the caution letter, should also
be provided to the parent or guardian of the young person wherever possible.
Once Crown counsel has confirmed that the young person has received the
caution, and has documented the file accordingly, the charge or charges
should be withdrawn or stayed, depending on the circumstances. See Appendix
D for the format of a Crown caution letter.
14.6.2.4 Extrajudicial sanctions Extrajudicial sanctions are the most serious response within the range
of extrajudicial measures. Unlike the other types of extrajudicial measures,
an extrajudicial sanction requires the young person to accept responsibility
for the act that forms the basis of the offence, and to comply with the
terms and conditions of the sanction. Failure to comply can result in
the prosecution of the offence. Also, unlike other types of extrajudicial
measures, the history of a young person’s involvement in extrajudicial
sanctions can be raised during the young person’s sentencing for
a subsequent offence in certain circumstances.
An extrajudicial sanction can be used only if the young person cannot
be adequately dealt with by a warning, caution or referral under sections
6, 7, or 8, because of the seriousness of the offence, the nature and
number of previous offences committed by the young person or any other
aggravating circumstances. The additional conditions that must be satisfied
under s. 10(2) of the YCJA before an extrajudicial sanction can
be used are virtually identical to the conditions that had to be satisfied
under s. 4(1) of the YOA before an alternative measure could be
used.
By virtue of s. 165(5) of the YCJA, any program of alternative
measures authorized under the YOA was deemed, as of the coming
into force of s. 165(5) of the YCJA, to be a program of extrajudicial
sanctions authorized for the purposes of the YCJA. Like alternative
measures under the YOA, extrajudicial sanctions programs under
the YCJA include letters of apology, essays, anti-shoplifting
educational programs, victim-offender reconciliation programs, personal
service to the victim, and community service.
14.6.3 General Principles for the Use of Extrajudicial Measures In addition to the principles set out in Section 3 of the YCJA,
which apply to the entire Act, Crown counsel must be mindful of
the following principles in Section 4 when considering whether to use
an extrajudicial measure and in determining which extrajudicial measure
option to use:
- Extrajudicial measures are often the most appropriate and
effective way to address youth crime;
- Extrajudicial measures allow for effective and timely interventions
focused on correcting offending behaviour; and
- Extrajudicial measures should be used if they would be adequate
to hold the young person accountable.
Crown counsel should also remain cognizant of the principle in s. 4(d)
of the YCJA, which states that extrajudicial measures should
be used if they are adequate to hold a young person accountable for his
or her offending
behaviour.
Determining whether an extrajudicial measure would be adequate
to hold the young person accountable requires Crown counsel to determine
whether an extrajudicial measure can provide meaningful consequences
that are proportionate to the seriousness of the offence and to the degree
of responsibility of the young person and that promote the young person’s
rehabilitation. Additional factors to consider in making this determination
are discussed below at 14.6.5 and 14.6.6.
Under s. 4 (c), extrajudicial measures are presumed to be adequate to
hold a young person accountable if the young person has committed a non-violent
offence and has not previously been found guilty of an offence. This
presumption is a strong direction from Parliament that Crown counsel
are expected to use extrajudicial measures rather than the court to deal
with non-violent offenders who have not previously been found guilty
of an offence. However, Crown counsel may find that there are circumstances
related to the seriousness of the offence that rebut the presumption
in some cases.
Further, under s. 4 (d), extrajudicial measures may be used even if
the young person has previously been dealt with by extrajudicial measures
or has previously been found guilty of an offence. The use of another
extrajudicial measure in these circumstances does not mean that the previous
extrajudicial measure was a failure, or that another extrajudicial measure
would not be adequate to hold the young person accountable for the current
offence.
Section 5 of the YCJA further provides that extrajudicial measures should
be designed to:
- Provide an effective and timely response to offending behaviour;
- Encourage young persons to acknowledge and repair the harm
caused to the victim and the community;
- Encourage the involvement of families and the community;
- Provide an opportunity for victims to participate and to
receive reparation;
- Respect the rights and freedoms of young persons; and
- Be proportionate to the seriousness of the offence.
14.6.4 Determining Whether an Extrajudicial Measure Would Be Adequate
to Hold a Young Person Accountable
In determining whether any of the following four extrajudicial measures
are adequate to hold a young person accountable (withdrawal of the charge;
referral to a community program; Crown caution; or extrajudicial sanction),
Crown counsel must consider sections 3, 4 and 5, and also assess: (a)
the seriousness of the offence; and (b) the nature and number of previous
offences or any other aggravating circumstances.
14.6.5 Factors related to the seriousness of the offence, and the history
of previous offences or any other aggravating circumstances
- whether the offence is summary or indictable;
- whether the offence involved the use of, or threatened use
of, violence reasonably likely to result in harm that is more than
transient
or trifling in nature. An offence involving bodily harm is not necessarily
too serious to be dealt with by extrajudicial measures. However,
the more serious the harm, the less likely that it should be dealt
with by
extrajudicial measures.
- the potential or actual harm or damage to the victim (physical,
psychological or financial) and/or to society;
- whether the incident affected the sexual integrity of a person;
- whether a weapon was used or threatened to be used in the
commission of the offence. As youth cases have demonstrated (water
balloons and
spit-balls have been found to be weapons), it is important to consider
the actual danger represented by the weapon.
- whether the offence is a drug offence. (If so, see below
at 14.6.6 for specific factors to consider in relation to Crown cautions
and extrajudicial sanctions.)
- if the offence is a drug offence, the nature and deleterious
consequences of the drugs involved should be considered (Again, see
14.6.6 for specific drug offence considerations and the possible use
of extrajudicial
measures.)
- if the drug trafficking or possession of the drug for the
purpose of trafficking occurred in or near a school, on or near school
grounds
or in or near any other public place usually frequented by persons
under the age of eighteen years old, this should be considered an aggravating
factor ; 10
- whether the offence is a property offence. If so, did the
young person intentionally cause or attempt to cause substantial property
damage
or loss? Should the young person have reasonably foreseen that substantial
property damage would be caused by the offence?
- whether the offence is an administration of justice offence,
such as breach of probation. If so, would the non-compliance (e.g.,
failure to attend school; violation of curfew) have been an offence
outside the
context of a probation order? If not, it should be considered less
serious and more likely to be dealt with appropriately through extrajudicial
measures or through a review of the original sentence to determine
whether
the conditions should be changed.
- the role of the young person in the incident. For example,
if the young person was the leader who planned and directed the offence,
then his/her degree of responsibility is greater. However, this factor
is secondary to the seriousness of the offence.
- whether the young person was a victim in the commission of
the offence (e.g., a sexually exploited juvenile prostitute; a young
person
committing a drug offence who is being directed or exploited by an
adult drug dealer). If so, it is more likely that an extrajudicial
measure
should be used.
- whether the young person has a history of committing offences.
If so, what is the nature and number of previous offences? Although
a history of offences may indicate that a more serious consequence
is required
to hold the young person accountable, this factor is secondary to
the seriousness of the current offence.
- whether the young person has already displayed remorse (e.g.,
through voluntary reparation to the victim or to the community) or
agreed to do so.
- If the young person were to proceed through the court system,
what is the likelihood that the sentence would be more severe than
what is available through extrajudicial measures? If the sentence is
expected
to be less severe, Crown counsel should consider whether proceeding
to court would be an effective use of Crown and judicial time and resources.
14.6.6 Choosing the Appropriate Extrajudicial Measure
In addition to the principles and objectives in sections 3, 4 and 5
of the Act and the factors outlined in section 14.6.5 above, specific
considerations apply to Crown cautions and to extrajudicial sanctions.
These considerations are discussed below.
14.6.6.1 Crown cautions: specific considerations
The choice between using a Crown caution or an extrajudicial sanction
depends on several factors. As stated in s. 10(1) of the YCJA,
a sanction may be used to deal with a young person alleged to have committed
an offence only if the young person cannot be dealt with by a warning,
caution or referral in sections 6, 7 or 8 because of the seriousness
of the offence, the nature and number of previous offences committed
by the young person or any other aggravating circumstances. Crown counsel
should determine the seriousness of the offence by considering the factors
discussed above at 14.6.5. The less serious the offence, the more likely
it is that a Crown caution should be used. The more serious the offence,
the more likely it is that an extrajudicial sanction should be used.
A Crown caution should not be used for offences in which the young person
intentionally caused or attempted to cause bodily harm or should have
reasonably foreseen that bodily harm would be caused by the offence.
Crown cautions should be adequate to hold a young person accountable
for a minor drug offence.
However, a Crown caution is unlikely to be adequate to hold a young
person accountable for the following drug offences:
- possession of large amounts of marijuana or hashish;
- possession of cocaine, ecstasy or heroin;
- trafficking in a controlled substance, or possession of the
controlled substance for the purpose of trafficking.
In certain circumstances, some of these drug offences could be dealt
with by an extrajudicial sanction.
14.6.6.2 Extrajudicial sanctions: specific considerations There is no limit to the number of times that a young person may be
dealt with through extrajudicial sanctions.
If the Crown determines that a less serious extrajudicial measure is
inappropriate, Crown counsel should still consider whether an extrajudicial
sanction would be adequate to hold the young person accountable for his
or her offending behaviour. Crown counsel must also remain cognizant
of the principle that an extrajudicial measure is presumed adequate to
hold a young person accountable if the young person has committed a non-violent
offence and has not previously been found guilty of an offence. It is
important to bear in mind, however, that presumptions are rebuttable.
In applying the factors in 14.6.5 and the relevant principles under the YCJA,
Crown counsel will sometimes conclude that a sanction is not appropriate
to hold the young person accountable in the circumstances.
When Crown counsel imposes a sanction on a young person, the young person’s
file should be documented accordingly.
Extrajudicial sanctions can be used to deal with some drug offences
that are too serious to be dealt with by a Crown caution. However, the
following drug offences and circumstances are unlikely to be appropriate
for extrajudicial sanctions:
- possession of large amounts of marijuana or hashish, or drugs
such as cocaine, heroin or ectasy;
- using another person more than two years younger than the
young person alleged to have committed the offence to commit or assist
in the commission of a drug offence;
- trafficking in a controlled substance, or possession of the
substance for the purpose of trafficking (an exception may arise where
the young person shares a very small quantity of the substance with
a peer for little or no consideration).
A young person’s refusal to consent to, or failure to follow through
on, an extrajudicial measure regarding substance abuse treatment should
not be interpreted as an unwillingness to participate in extrajudicial
measures in general, or as an indication that an extrajudicial measure
would not be adequate to hold the young person accountable for the offence.
The refusal or failure could be a factor in choosing a particular measure
but it should not be considered a bar to all extrajudicial measures.
14.7 The Canadian Environmental
Protection Act, 1999 The Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, (CEPA) contains
special provisions for the use of alternative measures in the environmental
prosecution context. The Department of the Environment has developed
a program of alternative measures which has been authorized by the Attorney
General pursuant to s. 296(1)(a) of the CEPA, 199911.
Section 296(1)(d) of the CEPA, 1999 sets out five factors counsel must
consider in determining whether alternative measures are appropriate.
14.8 Appendix A
ATTORNEY'S GENERAL ORDER
Section 717 of the Criminal Code provides, in part, as follows:
717.(1) Alternative measures may be used to deal with a person alleged
to have committed an offence only if it is not inconsistent with the
protection of society and the following conditions are met:
- the measures are part of a program of alternative measures
authorized by the Attorney General or the Attorney General's delegate
or authorized by a person, or a person within a class of persons, designated
by the lieutenant governor in council or a province;
- the person who is considering whether to use the measures is
satisfied that they would be appropriate, having regard to the needs
of the person
alleged to have committed the offence and the interests of society
and of the victim;
- the person, having been informed of the alternative measures,
fully and freely consents to participate therein;
- the person has, before consenting to participate in the alternative
measures, been advised of the right to be represented by counsel;
- the person accepts responsibility for the act or omission that
forms the basis of the offence that the person is alleged to have committed;
- there is, in the opinion of the Attorney General or the Attorney
- the prosecution of the offence is not in any way barred at law.
I,
_____________, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada,
pursuant to section 717 of the Criminal Code, do hereby authorize adult
alternative measures programs which are consistent with the policy
criteria contained in the "Alternative Measures (Diversion)” policy
in the Federal Prosecution Service Deskbook and Schedule “A”,
attached hereto.
I do hereby further authorize the Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy
Attorney General of Canada as my delegate for the purpose of amending
the policy and ensuring the effective implementation of the policy.
Dated at the City of Ottawa, Ontario, this day of , 20
__________________________
Minister of Justice and Attorney General
14.9 Appendix B
SCHEDULE A ALTERNATIVE MEASURES
(DIVERSION) PROGRAMS
For the purposes of s. 717(1)(a) of the Criminal Code , acceptable
programs of alternative measures include the following:
- any program approved by the Attorney General of a province;
- any program approved by a territorial government;
- referral to a community or aboriginal justice committee;
- community service work;
- restitution or compensation in cash or services;
- referral to a specialized program (e.g. life skills, drug
or alcohol treatment); and
- other reasonable alternatives not inconsistent with the objectives
of the policy.
14.9.1 APPENDIX C
ATTORNEY’S GENERAL ORDER: CROWN CAUTIONS
FOR YOUNG PERSONS
Section 8 of the Youth Criminal Justice Act provides:
The Attorney General may establish a program authorizing prosecutors
to administer cautions to young persons instead of starting or continuing
judicial proceedings under this Act.
I, Martin Cauchon, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada,
pursuant to section 8 of the Youth Criminal Justice Act, do hereby
establish a program of Crown cautions and authorize Crown counsel to
administer cautions to young persons instead of starting or continuing
judicial proceedings, in accordance with the policy, principles and objectives
in the YCJA, in particular, in accordance with the policy and
principles in sections 3, 4, 5 and 10 of the YCJA.
I do hereby further authorize the Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy
Attorney General of Canada as my delegate for the purpose of developing
and implementing policy concerning Crown cautioning programs that is
consistent with the YCJA. In keeping with that policy, federal
prosecutors are to consider using Crown cautions in relation to only
minor offences alleged to have been committed by young persons.
Dated at the City of Ottawa, Ontario, this 23 day of April , 2003.
M. Cauchon
______________________________________
Minister of Justice and Attorney General
14.9.2 APPENDIX D
CROWN CAUTION LETTERS Consistent with the policy criteria set out in Section 14.6 of this
policy, Crown counsel may administer Crown cautions under s. 8 of the Youth
Criminal Justice Act, in the format below, modified as necessary
to fit the circumstances.
Section 8
Youth Criminal Justice Act
Crown Caution to a Young Person
To: (name of young person)
The Federal Prosecution Service has received a report from {police agency}.
In this report, police officers indicate that they have reasonable grounds
to believe that you have broken the law by:
{set out offence(s)}.
While there is sufficient information to proceed with a prosecution,
the Crown has decided, under section 8 of the Youth Criminal Justice
Act, to issue a formal caution to you rather than proceeding with charges
for this offence.
If you break the law in the future, more serious consequences, including
charges and prosecution with potentially serious penalties, may follow.
You are required to contact the Crown’s office, or your probation
officer or youth worker, to confirm receipt of this caution letter.
(date)
(place)
{name of person signing on behalf of the Attorney General}
Contact # for further information___________________
14.9.3 APPENDIX E
Notice to Parent or Guardian
Crown counsel may notify a parent or guardian of the young person that
a Crown caution has been administered in the following format, modified
as necessary to fit the circumstances.
Youth Criminal Justice Act
Notice to the Parent or Guardian that a Young Person has been given
a Crown Caution
To:{name of parent, guardian or adult with legal responsibility for
young person}
This letter concerns {name of young person}.
The Federal Prosecution Service has received a report from {police agency}.
In this report, police officers indicate that they have reasonable grounds
to believe that (name of young person) has broken the law by:
{set out offence(s)}
While there is sufficient information to proceed with a prosecution,
the Crown has decided, under section 8 of the Youth Criminal Justice
Act, to issue a formal caution to (the young person) rather than
proceeding with charges for this offence.
Please understand that if (the name of the young person) breaks the
law in the future, there may be more serious consequences, including
charges and prosecution with potentially serious penalties.
{date}
{place}
{name of person signing on behalf of the Attorney General}
Contact # for further information___________________
14.9.4 APPENDIX F
ATTORNEY’S GENERAL ORDER
Section 10 of the Youth Criminal Justice Act provides, in part,
as follows:
10. (2) An extrajudicial sanction may be used only if
- it is part of a program of sanctions that may be authorized by
the Attorney General or authorized by a person, or a member of a class
of
persons, designated by the lieutenant governor in council of the
province;
- the person who is considering whether to use the extrajudicial
sanction is satisfied that it would be appropriate, having regard to
the needs
of the young person and the interests of society;
- the young person, having been informed of the extrajudicial sanction,
fully and freely consents to be subject to it;
- the young person has, before consenting to be subject to the
extrajudicial sanction, been advised of his or her right to be represented
by counsel
and been given a reasonable opportunity to consult with counsel;
- the young person accepts responsibility for the act or omission
that forms the basis of the offence that he or she is alleged to
have committed;
- there is, in the opinion of the Attorney General, sufficient
evidence to proceed with the prosecution of the offence; and
- the prosecution of the offence is not in any way barred at law.
(3) An extrajudicial sanction may not be used in respect
of a young person who
- denies participation or involvement in the commission of the
offence; or
- expresses the wish to have the charge dealt with by a youth justice
court.
I, ___________________, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of
Canada, pursuant to section 10 of the Youth Criminal Justice Act, do
hereby authorize extrajudicial sanctions programs for young persons,
which are consistent with the policy criteria contained in the Extrajudicial
Measures policy for young persons in the Federal Prosecution Service
Deskbook.
I do hereby further authorize the Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy
Attorney General of Canada as my delegate for the purpose of amending
the policy and ensuring the effective implementation of the policy.
Dated at the City of Ottawa, this day of , 2003.
______________________________________ Minister of Justice and
Attorney General
14.9.5 APPENDIX G
Extrajudicial sanctions under the YCJA For the purposes of s. 10 of the Youth Criminal Justice Act, acceptable
programs of extrajudicial sanctions include the following:
- any program approved by the Attorney General of a province;
- any program approved by a territorial government;
- any program approved by the Attorney General of Canada;
- referral to a community, aboriginal or youth justice committee;
- community service work;
- victim-offender reconciliation;
- restitution or compensation in cash or services;
- mediation;
- referral to a specialized program (e.g. life skills, drug
or alcohol treatment); and
- any other reasonable alternatives not inconsistent with the
objectives of the FPS policy.
1 Investigative agencies
also "divert" alleged offenders by exercising their discretion
not to lay charges. This policy deals only with situations in which Crown
counsel play a role in the diversion decision.
2 Part V, Chapter 15.
3 Where government departments
have compliance programs for regulatory offences, diversion will usually
be considered within the context of
the program. Crown counsel should bear in mind that many offenders referred
for prosecution for having committed regulatory offences will have already
been considered inappropriate for participation in a compliance program.
4 Part VI, Chapter 28.
5 Part VI, Chapter 25.
6 Part VI, Chapter 27.
7 Part VI, Chapter 31.
8 In unusual circumstances,
diversion may be considered despite the presence of this factor. However,
authorization must be obtained from
the Federal Prosecution Service Director or Regional Director.
9 Part V, Chapter 15.
10 This
factor should be applied with particular care in the case of young persons
since it is clearly more aggravating for an adult trafficker
to attend a school for the purpose of selling drugs to youths than for
a young person to sell drugs to his peers at school.
11 Pursuant
to Part V, Chapter 16, “Decisions Made by, and on
Behalf of, the Attorney General,” the authorization of the program
is made by the Assistant Deputy Attorney General, Criminal Law. The program
is described in a document entitled Guidelines for Negotiating and Monitoring
Environmental Protection Alternative Agreements under the Canadian Environmental
Protections Act.
[ Previous | Table of Contents | Next ]
|