|
|
Évaluation du risque et des besoins chez les jeunes contrevenants : un aperçuLes opinions exprimées sont celles des auteures et ne sont pas nécessairement partagées par le ministère de la Justice Canada.Page précédente | Table des matières BibliographieAcoca, L. et J. Austin. 1996. The Crisis: Women in Prison. Women OffenderSentencing Study. San Francisco, CA: NCCD. Andrews, D. 1989. "Recidivism Is Predictable and Can Be Influenced: Using Risk Assessments To Reduce Recidivism." Forum on Corrections Research1(2). Andrews, D. A. et J. Bonta. 1998. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct.(2eéd.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co. Andrews, D. A., J. Bonta et R. Hoge. 1990. "Classification for Effective Rehabilitation: Rediscovering Psychology." Criminal Justice Behaviour.17:19-52. Andrews, D. A., D. Robinson et R. D. Hoge. 1984. Manual for the Youth Level of Service Inventory.Ottawa, Canada: Département de psychologie, Université Carleton. Andrews, D. A., I. Zinger, R. Hoge, J. Bonta, P. Gendreau et F. Cullen. 1990. "Does Correctional Treatment Work? A Psychologically Informed Meta Analysis." Criminology28:419-429. Aubrey, R. et M. Hough. 1997. Assessing Offenders' Needs: Assessment Scales for the Probation Service.Home Office Research Study 166. London: Home Office. Austin, J., L. Chan et W. Elms. 1993. Indiana Department of Corrections Women Classification Study.San Francisco, CA: NCCD. Bonta, J. 2002. "Offender Risk Assessment: Guidelines for Use." Criminal Justice and Behaviour29(4):355-79. Bhui, H. S. 1999. "Racism and Risk Assessment: Linking Theory to Practice with Black Mentally Disordered Offenders." Probation Journal46(3):171-81. Brennan, T. 1998. "Institutional Classification for Females: Problems and some Proposals for Reform." In Female Offenders: Critical Perspectives and Effective Interventionssous la direction de R.T. Zaplin. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers Inc. Brennan, T. et J. Austin. 1997. Women in Jail: Classification Issues.Washington DC: US Department of Justice National Institute of Corrections. Canada. 2003. Rapport du vérificateur général du Canada à la Chambre des communes - Chapitre 4 Service correctionnel du Canada, la réinsertion sociale des femmes. Ottawa, Canada: Bureau du vérificateur général. Cole, D. et G. Angus. 2003. Using Pre Sentence Reports to Evaluate and Respond To Risk. Paper presented at the National Judicial Institute. À paraître dans Criminal Law Quarterly. Costigan, S. 1999. Critical Evaluation of the Long-term Validity of the Risk/Need Assessment and its Young Offender Typology.Mémoire de maîtrise non publié, Université Lakehead, Thunder Bay, Ontario. Costigan, S. M. et E. P. Rawana. 1999. Critical Evaluation of the Long-term Validity of the Risk/Need Assessment.Allocution prononcée à la Conférence annuelle de l'Association canadienne de psychologie, Halifax, Nouvelle-Écosse. Cullen, F. et P. Gendreau. 2001. "From Nothing Works to What Works: Changing Professional Ideology in the 21stCentury." The Prison Journal81(3): 313-38. Daly, D. et R. Lane. 1999. "Actuarially Based 'On Line' Risk Assessment in Western Australia." Probation Journal46(3):164-70. Dawson, D. 1999. Risk of Violence Assessment: Aboriginal Offenders and Assumption of Homogeneity . Allocution prononcée à laBest Practice Interventions in Corrections for Indigenous People Conference, Adelaide, Australia. Australian Institute of Criminology and Department of Correctional Service for S.A. Girard, L. 1999. The Level of Service Inventory - Ontario Revision: Risk/Need Assessment and Recidivism.Thèse de doctorat, département de psychologie, Université d'Ottawa, Ottawa. Gottfredson, S. D. 1987. "Prediction: An Overview of Selected Methodological Issues." In Prediction and Classification, publié par D.M. Gottfredson et M. Tonry.Crime and Justice9. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Gottfredson, D. M. et M. Tonry, (dir.) 1987. "Prediction and Classification." Crime and Justice9. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Gray, N., J. Laing et L. Noaks (2002)Criminal Justice, Mental Health and the Politics of Risk.London: Cavendish Publishing. Hannah-Moffat, K. 1999. "Moral Agent or Actuarial Subject: Risk and Canadian Women's Imprisonment." Theoretical Criminology3(1):71-94. Hannah-Moffat, K. 2000. "Reforming the Prison, Rethinking Our Ideals." Publié dans An Ideal Prison? Critical Essays On Women's Imprisonment in Canadasous la direction de K. Hannah-Moffat et M. Shaw.Halifax, Canada: Fernwood Publishing. Hannah-Moffat, K. 2002. Criminogenic Need and the Transformative Risk Subject: The Hybridizations of Risk/Need in Penalty .Allocution prononcée à la British Criminology ConferenceUK. Keele University. Hannah-Moffat, K. et M. Shaw. 2001. Taking Risks: Incorporating Gender and Culture into Classification and Assessment of Federally Sentenced Women.Ottawa, Canada: Condition féminine Women Canada. Hoge, R. D. 2002. "Standardized Instruments for Assessing Risk and Need in Youthful Offenders." Criminal Justice and Behaviour29(4):380-96. Hoge, R. D. 2001. "A Case Management Instrument for Use in Juvenile Justice System." Juvenile and Family Court Journal52 (Spring):25-32. Hoge, R. D. et D. A. Andrews. 2002. Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory: User's Manual.Toronto, Canada: Multi Health Services. Hoge, R. D. et D. A. Andrews. 1996. Assessing risk and need factors in the youthful offender . Allocution prononcée à l'Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association,Toronto, Ontario. Hoge, R. D., D. A. Andrews et A. W. Leschied. 1996. "An Investigation of Risk and Protective Factors in a Sample of Youthful Offenders." Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry37(4):419-24. Hudson, B. (forthcoming) Justice in the Risk Society California: Sage Publications. Hudson, B. 2001. "Punishment, Rights, and Difference: Defending Justice in the risk Society." Publié dans Crime, Risk and Justice: The politics of Crime control in liberal democracies sous la direction de K. Stenson et R. Sullivan. London: Willan Publishing. Jung, S. 1996. Critical Evaluation of the Validity of the Risk/Need Assessment with Aboriginal Young Offenders in Northwestern Ontario.Mémoire de maîtrise non publié, Université Lakehead, Thunder Bay, Ontario. Jung, S., et E. P. Rawana. 1999. "Risk-Need Assessment of Juvenile Offenders." Criminal Justice and Behaviour26:69-89. Kemshall, H. 1998. Risk in Probation Practice. Hampshire, England: Ashgate. Lindsey, A. J. 2000. Psychopathy, Risk/Need Factors, and Psychiatric Symptoms in High-risk Youth: Relationships Between Variables and their Link to Recidivism.Thèse de doctorat non publiée, Université Simon Fraser, Vancouver, Colombie-Britannique. Loza, W. et D. Simourd. 1994. "Psychometric Evaluation of the Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI) Among Canadian Federal Offenders." Criminal Justice and Behaviour21: 468-480. MacLeod, S. March 1995. Youth Management Assessment: User Guide.Ministère du Solliciteur général et des Services correctionnels, Centre de perfectionnement du personnel Bell Cairn. Ministère du Solliciteur général et des Services correctionnels. 1995.Level of Service Inventory - OR - Facts behind Risk Assessment.Ministère du Solliciteur général et des Services correctionnels de l'Ontario. O'Malley, P. 1999.The Risk Society: Implications for Justice and Beyond.Université La Trobe: ministère de la Justice, Victoria, Australie. Motiuk, L. 1993. "Where are we in our Ability to Assess Risk?"Forum on Corrections Research5:14-18. Petersilia, J. et S. Turner. 1987. "Prediction and Racial Minorities." Publié dans Prediction and Classification, sous la direction de D. M. Gottfredson et M. Tonry. Crime and Justice9. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Poluchowicz, S., S. Jung et E. P. Rawana. 2000. The Interrater Reliability of the Ministry Risk/Need Assessment Form for Juvenile Offenders.Allocution prononcée à la Conférence annuelle de l'Association canadienne de psychologie, Ottawa, Ontario. Reichman, N. 1986. "Managing Crime Risks: Towards an Insurance Based Model of Social Control." Research In Law Deviance and Social Control8:151-172. Robinson, G. 2002. "Exploring Risk Management in Probation Practice: Contemporary Developments in England and Wales" Punishment and Society.4(1):5-26. Robinson, G. 1999. "Risk Management and Rehabilitation in the Probation Service: Collision and Collusion" The Howard Journal 38(4):421-433. Robinson, G. 1996. "Refining the Risk Concept: Decision Context as a Factor Mediating the Relation Between Risk and Program Effectiveness" Crime and Delinquency42(3): 435-455. Rose, N. 1998. "Governing Risky Individuals: The Role Of Psychiatry In New Regimes Of Control." Psychiatry, Psychology And The Law5(2):177-195. Schmidt, F., R. D. Hoge et L. Robertson. May 2002. Assessing Risk and Need in Youthful Offenders. Allocution prononcée à la Conférence annuelle de l'Association canadienne de psychologie à Vancouver. Shields, I. W. et D. J. Simourd. 1991. "Predicting predatory behaviour in a population of young offenders." Criminal Justice and Behaviour18:180-94. Silver, E. et L. Miller. 2002. "A Cautionary Note on the Use of Actuarial Risk Assessment Tools for Social Control." Crime and Delinquency 48(1):138-161. Simourd, L., R. D. Hoge et D. A. Andrews. 1991. The Youth Level of Service Inventory: An examination of the development of a risk/needs instrument.Allocution prononcée à la Conférence annuelle de l'Association canadienne de psychologie à Calgary, Alberta. Simourd, L., R. D. Hoge, D. A. Andrews et A. W. Leschied. 1994. "An Empirically Based Typology of Male Young Offenders." Canadian Journal of Criminology 36:447-61. Stenson, K. et R. Sullivan. 2001.Crime, Risk and Justice: the politics of Crime control in liberal democracies. London: Willan Publishing. Williamson, A. 2000. Final Report: Risk Needs Assessment Project. Île-du-Prince-Édouard: Community and Correctional Services Initiative. Zimmerman, S., R. Martin, et T. Rogosky. 2001. "Developing a Risk Assessment Instrument: Lessons about Validity Relearned." Journal of Criminal Justice29(1):57-66. * NdT: Youth agreement . Entente officielle signée par un représentant du ministère de l'enfance et de la famille de la Colombie-Britannique et par un jeune âgé de 16 à 19 ans qui présente des risques élevés. En vertu de l'entente, un ou plusieurs services peuvent être fournis au jeune en vue de répondre à ses besoins liés au logement, à l'éducation, etc. |
Mise à jour : 2005-10-22 | Avis importants |