Home : Innovation : Environmental Technologies : Western Canadian Environmental Technology Forum
Appendix 2:
Consolidated Breakout Reports – Afternoon Session
Breakout Session #2:
Identification of Initiatives and Action Steps
There were five breakout groups in the afternoon session organized
around the five strategies:
- Regulatory and Policy Mechanisms
- Marketing Strategy
- Fiscal Incentives
- Centres of Excellence
- Demonstration Projects
Regulatory and Policy Mechanisms
Initiatives |
Who's Involved |
Critical Needs/Actions |
Time Frame |
Bring About Regulatory
Coordination/ Harmonization
• Create smart performance-based
environmental regulatory reporting
with three levels of government to
one point of focus
• Pan-western review of
entrepreneurial technology
regulations led by provincial
ministers of environment and
ministers of industry and
facilitated by the Government
of Canada:
- Standardize
- Eliminate
- Strengthen
• Single portal for government
information on programs
• Performance-based
regulations (action-comprehensive
regulatory review):
- Predictable
- Consistent
- Business certainty
|
Federal, provincial,
municipal and
First Nations
governments |
Prime Minister,
Environment
Minister and
provincial First
Ministers to convene
a series of meetings
to create smart,
performance-based
environmental
regulations |
3 years |
Promote Eco-Efficiency through
Performance-Based Standards
• Waste recycling objectives: The
Canadian Council of Ministers of
the Environment (CCME) is to
establish national policy to
encourage recycling of waste for
multiple cycle use rather than
disposal. Currently 80% of
industry waste is land filled without
any recovery or reuse. Set target to
reduce volume to 50% through
recycling to recover as a resource
• Minimum efficiency standards for
power plants, homes, and
commercial buildings
• Government should set fleet
emission standard
• Power generation: credit for
pollution reduction (e.g. NOx)
compared to existing mix
• Measurement and public reporting
of environmental performance and
eco-efficiency for industry
• Establish energy budget for
Canadian buildings: e.g. 5 kilowatt
hours per square metre per year
• Sustainable building policy: use
LEED as a performance based
building standard for all federal
funded projects including Indian
and Northern Affairs Canada
(INAC), Health Canada, Public
Works and Government Services
Canada (PWGSC)
• Require improvement of industrial
eco-efficiency over time
• Canadian Space Agency (CSA):
quick approvals for good
technologies |
PWGSC,
Infrastructure Canada,
Health Canada,
INAC,
Canadian Mortgage
and Housing Corporation
(CMHC),
National Research
Council (NRC),
provincial governments |
Hold regular
intergovernmental
and industrial
meetings/forums,
establish performance-based
targets, and use
a multi-stakeholder
process |
0 to 5 years |
Transfigure the Electricity Industry
from Centralized Vertical Integration
to a Distributed Generation Model
• National standards for
interconnection in metering (re:
energy decentralization)
• Net metering: enabling micro, mini
and large generators to easily and
transparently sell surplus electricity
back to the utility at market price
• Export driven |
Federal and
provincial
governments |
Multi-layer
intergovernmental
meeting |
|
Additional Initiative: Market Support
- Require locally-based manufacturing for imported technologies
- Risk underwriting for new technologies
Marketing Strategies
Discussion
- Is it reasonable to have one strategy for all technologies?
- We want market pull
- Is there a single industry?
- We need marketing enablers, not marketing strategies
- Marketing enablers: broad category
- SMEs don’t know the resources that exist
- Need enablers that help us reach specific customers
- Strategic underpinning of marketing: products
- What is the highest value market proposition?
- Small companies cannot afford marketing personnel: support
does exist
- Can SMEs band together through trade associations to
get market intelligence? Barriers: SMEs are introverted, lack time,
and are fragmented
- Example: small companies are banding together in this
case
- Goal of attacking international markets requires that
we get out of provincial silos
- We suffer from a lack of critical mass; we need a vehicle
to pull us together
- How much do we have in common?
Summary: Key themes of opening discussion
- Need marketing enablers, not marketing strategies
- Lack of commonality among environmental technology and
firms
- Need to get out of provincial silos to attack international
markets
- Fragmentation and lack of resources among SMEs
- SMEs not aware of resources that exist
Enabler: a technology or resource that clears roadblocks and allows
a company or process to move forward more efficiently. Example:
providing a list of potential customers
Consideration: what kind of firms are we talking about?
Initiatives
- Provide incentives for large companies with large projects
to allow SMEs to piggyback on development of projects. Who: CIDA
- Technology partnerships as enablers: incentives for
incorporating standards or technologies
- Facilitate networking and information flow through trade
commissions and other such bodies – ensure bodies already
in place have sufficient resources. How will Western Economic Diversification
Canada facilitate continued dialogue?
- Knowledge capture based on real case studies of successful
companies. Deconstructed case of Joule Microsystems Canada – enabling
factors: serendipity; the board; access to government programs;
CEO recognized importance of research, product and marketing; finding
a partner locally (Terasen)
- Provide marketing expertise for firms trying to commercialize
or go international; mentoring; centres of excellence; differences
among companies; more collaborative approach needed (Team Canada);
differentiating from others internationally: what is uniquely Canadian;
sales force closing deals internationally; resources to fill orders;
tying in R&D funding to marketing
- Canadian government providing level playing field (e.g.
one bid from Japan vs. three from Canada)
- Some of the federal enablers do exist; have SME programs
and the budget; problem: we do not excel in Canada in use of technologies;
focus on what the international customers are looking for; example
of 21 BC forestry service companies coming together to provide integrated
solution – trade alliance
- Industry connectivity: larger players don’t know
the small players. Industrial Research Assistance Program (IRAP),
Scientific Research and Experimental Development Program (SR&ED),
Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade have a role
- Targeted trade alliances segmented by market
- Need a brand name: Canadian government certified products
as tool for differentiation? Advantage in some cases but not all;
should it be international certification instead?
- Address need for SME visibility: companies looking for
niche solutions go to the Web
- Federal government assistance in levelling the playing
field internationally for SMEs: SMEs going to US due to superior
programs
- Mechanism to get marketing expertise to companies at
earlier stage; connecting commercialization support to R&D funding
Fiscal Incentives
Discussion
- Reduced capital gains tax for environmental technology
and green buildings
- RPS/Financing: design RPS to capture financial issues
- Accelerated depreciation of environmental assets
- Broaden production/reduce consumption or conservation
incentives of “brown” incentives to green technologies
- Expansion of flow-through shares
Initiatives
- Tax Incentives
- Create incentives for green technologies (e.g. energy production)
- Level the playing field for all energy sources
- Consider emission caps
- Expansion of flow-through share incentives (consistent for
all industries)
- Enhanced Canadian Exploration Expense (CEE) for all renewable
energy sources
- Tax credits for environmental technology adoption (e.g.
film industry, labour funds)
- Broaden and Increase Renewable Energy Production, Consumption,
Conservation Incentives
- Net metering
- National system of green tags
- Expanding this concept to other environmental technology
(e.g. wind production incentive to other environmental technology
areas)
- Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS)/Financing
- Consumer financing
- SME financing
- An example includes Independent Power Producers Assurance
Bonds
Centres of Excellence
Discussion
- Centre versus regional
- Excellence overused
- Research and commercialization
- Innovation network
- Expertise versus excellence
- Node versus centre
- Build on existing organizations (professional etc.)
- Has to include commercialization consortium
- Intersectional partnerships
- Research
- Training
- Consumer
- Public/private/non-governmental organizations/University
partnerships
- Environment vs. sustainability
- Crucial drivers = Social etc.
- An example includes Environmental Technology Advancement
Nodes
- Environmental technology – marketable locally
- The structure of centres of excellence:
- Facilitate/participate
- Have mentoring capacity
- Generate new ideas/products/services
- Move forward to commercialization
- Market research and partners: e.g. venture capital
- Partnering with industry
- Portals for information regarding funding research
- Stay out of research and focus on marketing
- Commercialization clients
- Organizations/private agencies
- Investors, Venture Capital
- Branding the capacity of industry in Western Canada
- Review of regulations to determine public policy
- Due diligence on products (SMEs)
- Convene investors/industry/market alliances/partnerships
- Mentor the project to commercialization
- Marketing
- Manage growth
- Focus:
- Long term, sustainable strategic work for the industry
- Knowledge sharing
- Strategic alliances
Initiatives
-
Implement demonstration of integrated solutions – independent
review of technology
- Facilitate linkage between existing centres and resources
to commercialize environmental technology
- Define the needs of the sector for commercialization
to refine the vision and the strategy
- Audit resource clusters and centres of excellence
- Market research
- Technical and financial risk reduction
Demonstration Projects
Discussion
- Environmental technology and ways of living with that
technology
- After R&D, before product development
- Demonstration projects: Part of the flow, essence of
the process
- Demonstration projects: tested in the marketplace
- Integrated solutions: demonstration projects that makes
many technologies work
- Real world, commercially viable, relevance to location
- Room for strategic partnerships: first priority (e.g.
Sustainable University of British Columbia campus)
- Pet projects: problem of prioritizing; synthesize approaches
- The more the merrier: the more demonstration projects
the better; cannot be narrowly defined at this point
- Using the technology and seeing which technology works:
cannot limit the technologies
- Strategic competitive framework: what does the market
want locally and internationally – need to know why we’re
doing it
- Community has to have the capacity to accommodate demonstration
projects
- Also need to follow up on demonstration projects: significant
assessment to see what works, what does not
- Challenge: Strategic mechanisms, actions that do not
zero-in on one project
- Different requirements/objectives, conflicting strategies
- Demonstration projects are experiments: expect the unexpected;
need flexible framework
- Which technologies deserve demo projects?
- Refocusing: What about structuring demo projects? e.g.,
challenge people to come up with ideas in transportation; learn
how to do what we normally do but in a sustainable way
- Demonstration programs: transportation, energy and sustainable
buildings; regarding sector approach (food production, waste disposal,
etc.)
- Sustainability approaches in cities: technology frameworks
that work with existing systems; goal is livable regions
- Social dimension of fear of change: need to look at
diversity of demonstration projects and range of projects; regarding
satisfying
societal needs sustainably and cost-effectively
- Need for open evaluations of projects using strict evaluation
standards
- Need for integration: distribution, management, etc.
regarding demonstration projects that serve criteria mentioned
- Energy supply problem of Vancouver Island: social, geographic,
complex problem
- Demonstrations that need to address problems
- Living with the old infrastructure: example of fibre-optical
links in Japanese homes; complete change in socialization
- Demonstration projects specifically for Western Canada
that deal with air, soil, water, oil and gas
Initiatives
The 2010 Winter Olympics
- What: Olympics to become a demonstration project for
Canadian environmental technology and sustainable living: Olympic
Village,
Green Building accommodations for tourists, transportation, cross-Canada
sustainability torch relay (regarding a green torch network connecting
Canada), new green sporting facilities, demonstration of an entire
closed loop system, and green procurement
- Who: athletes, tourists, planners, Olympic Organizing
Committee, etc.
- When: 2010
Model Green Remote Communities
- What: Model Green Remote Communities, one in each province:
a project to demonstrate integrated, sustainable, community systems
in lower technology Canadian communities with a goal to export what
is learned about addressing population growth in less industrialized
countries – education and learning program
- Elements: Locally based planning methods, Green Buildings,
alternative renewable local energy grid, alternative water and waste
water systems; eco-industrial network between business and the community
- Who: Aboriginal organizations, federal government departments,
research facilities – University of British Columbia, Simon
Fraser University, Laurentian University, University of Alberta,
University of Saskatchewan, Canadian Light Source (Saskatoon), government – BC
Sustainable Resource Management, private sector
- When: Staggered rollouts
A Green Community: Waste to Use
- What: Example: Britannia Beach Mine Site
- High profile site
- Contaminated site: worst metal pollution site in North
America
- To be remediated by 2005
- On Sea to Sky Highway, close to new Sea to Sky University
- Gateway to 2010 Winter Olympics
- Technology can be replicated on global basis
- Addresses a significant Canadian industry and how it
protects the environment
- Transforms an eyesore into something of value
<< previous | next >>