Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat - Government of Canada
Skip to Side MenuSkip to Content Area
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
What's New About Us Policies Site Map Home

Human
Resources
Head offices
Supervision
Work instruments
Personal and central services
Professional training and development
Meetings
Reference Tools
Related Policies
List of Bilingual Regions of Canada for the Language-of-Work Purposes
Guidelines: Language of Work in Bilingual Regions
Other Tools
Printable Version

Guidelines: Language of Work in Unilingual Regions


Unilingual regions are those not identified in the list of regions designated as bilingual for language of work purposes.

Each federal institution should examine its language of work situation in light of its specific circumstances and adopt a flexible and pragmatic approach to providing services to its employees working in regions referred to as unilingual. Nothing in the guidelines should be construed as preventing the use of either official language in any circumstances that do not interfere with the operational effectiveness of an office or work unit. It is important to keep in mind, however, that if an institution has offices both in the unilingual parts of Quebec and in other unilingual regions, the treatment of both official languages must be reasonably comparable.

Head offices

A federal institution with its head office in a unilingual region will already be providing central and personal services to employees in both official languages if it has offices located in bilingual regions. It would be reasonable in such cases to provide some or all central and personal services in both official languages to the employees in its head office and in any other of its offices.

Supervision

A supervisor in a unilingual region may decide to provide employees with supervision in the official language of their choice if this can be accomplished without affecting the language requirements of the position or functions of the supervisor.

For example, if a work unit in a unilingual region is working largely or entirely in the official language of the minority (e.g., a group of English language teachers in Chicoutimi or a group of French language teachers in Halifax), it would be reasonable for the supervision of this unit to be in the official language of the minority.

Work instruments

Whenever regularly and widely used documents or other material are already available in both official languages, federal institutions should make them available in both official languages to employees in unilingual regions. It is important to ensure, however, that within the same institution the availability of bilingual material in unilingual English regions is comparable to the availability of such material in unilingual French regions.

Personal and central services

Federal institutions are encouraged to provide personal and central services in both official languages in unilingual regions, whenever this is feasible, particularly when they currently provide such services in both official languages. For example, an institution that has offices in a bilingual region may already have the capacity to provide personal services to all employees in either official language.

Professional training and development

Within a federal institution, the possibilities for professional training and development in English for English-speaking employees should be reasonably comparable to those in French for French-speaking employees, regardless of the location of their offices.

Job-related training should be made available according to the language requirements of the positions or functions. Employees who must work in both official languages should be able to choose the language in which they want to take courses.

Managers should make every reasonable effort to provide employees with career development training in the official language of the employees' choice.

Federal institutions should inform employees of the availability of professional training and development courses in each of the official languages and invite them to identify the language in which they wish to participate.

Even when relatively few employees express a desire to take a given course in the official language of the minority, a federal institution should investigate all possibilities to ensure that the preference of the employee is respected. For instance, it could consider administering a joint course with other institutions, or taking advantage of other existing courses. Alternatively, the institution might investigate the feasibility of enrolling the employee in an appropriate course outside the region.

Meetings

When an intra- or interdepartmental meeting held in an unilingual region brings together representatives of both linguistic communities who work either in bilingual regions or in English and French unilingual regions, the institution should consider holding the meeting in both official languages.