Section III: Supplementary
Information -Mandatory Requirement
Due to the level of information
required to complete the RPP and DPR tables, the following section has
been divided into three subsections: Organizational Information, Instructions
on How to Complete RPP Tables and Instructions on How to Complete
DPR Tables.
This information is to provide the reader with the
department’s mandate; an organizational structure and identify who is
accountable at each level down to the assistant deputy minister.
Instructions on
how to Complete RPP Tables: The RPP section doesn't contain any updates,
as the 2005-06 RPPs were tabled on March 24th, 2005
RPP tables are generally displayed
over a three-year planning period and are followed by a brief explanation of
the rationale for the allocation of resources and/or spending trends. Financial
data can be presented in either
thousands
or
millions
of dollars
(to one decimal point). Whichever value is chosen must be used consistently
throughout the RPP.
As many of the following 17
tables as are relevant must be displayed in the RPP:
1.
Planned Spending and Full-time
Equivalents (FTEs)
2.
Program Activities
3.
Voted and Statutory Items Listed in the Main Estimates
4.
Net Cost of Department
5.
Summary of Capital Spending by Program Activity
6.
Loans, Investments, and Advances (Non-budgetary)
7.
Sources of Respendable and Non-respendable Revenue
8.
Revolving Funds - Statement of Operations, Statement of Cash
Flows, and Projected Use of Authority
9.
Resource Requirements by Branch or Sector
10.
User Fees
11.
Major Regulatory Initiatives
12.
Details on Project Spending
*
13.
Status Report on Major Crown Projects
*
14.
Details on Transfer Payment Programs (Grants,
Contributions, and Other Transfer Payments)
*
15.
Foundations (Conditional Grants)
*
16.
Alternative Service Delivery
*
17.
Horizontal Initiatives
*
If tables 12 to 17 are relevant to
the department, the department must
provide summary information in the
printed RPP document
and reference the Secretariat’s Web site (
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
).
Departments are required to
fill
in templates that are available on the Secretariat’s Web site
(along with
the guidelines) at
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.
Once the template is completed, each department is to post it on its Web site
at the same time it posts the tabled RPP.
_______________
*
Special instructions
apply to these tables.
Departments are also to
provide
a URL address
for the above-mentioned templates and submit it to the
appropriate contact at the Secretariat, along with their print-ready material.
The templates are not to be
inserted into the printed document. They will be
posted individually
on the
department’s Web site and the Secretariat will provide a link to them
.
The departmental planned
spending
table summarizes the Main Estimates and then applies adjustments to arrive at
the total planned spending requirement for an entire department.
The Main Estimates amount must be
identical to that printed in the current Main Estimates. The adjustment may
consist of Supplementary Estimates, the Minister of Finance’s budget, or any
other associated adjustments.
The
departmental planned
spending table must reflect the total planned spending figures conveyed to the
department by the Secretariat in early January
. It must also identify the department’s planned full-time
equivalent levels over the planning period.
Departments can present their
financial information in either
thousands
or
millions
of dollars
(to one decimal point). However, the department must use
the same value
consistently
throughout
the RPP.
Under the “
Forecast Spending”
column, note the following:
-
The program activity breakout
must reflect the same breakout as the recently tabled Main Estimates document.
All adjustments are to be made under the “Adjustments” heading.
-
The “Adjustments” section is
to be used to report a department’s funding requirements in addition to the
Main Estimates.
As a
result, the department must identify the initiative and the associated funding.
For example, if adjustments were received through Supplementary Estimates, then
the department is to first identify that the adjustment was made through
Supplementary Estimates and then identify each adjustment, using the same
terminology displayed in the Supplementary Estimates under the “Explanation of
Requirements” section, as in the following example:
|
Forecast
|
Planned
|
Planned
|
Planned
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Estimates
|
|
|
|
|
Public security and anti-terrorism
|
$xx
|
$xx
|
$xx
|
$xx
|
Non-civilian salary increases
|
. . . . .
|
$xx
|
$xx
|
$xx
|
Military housing
|
. . . . .
|
. . . . .
|
$xx
|
$xx
|
Total Adjustments
|
$xx
|
$xx
|
$xx
|
$xx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under
the “
Planned Spending” columns,
any new items
that have not yet been
approved should be noted as such and a brief statement provided as to when the
department expects approval.
Example of a Departmental Planned Spending Table
($ millions)
|
Forecast
Spending
2005–06
|
Planned
Spending
2005–06
|
Planned
Spending
2006–07
|
Planned
Spending
2007–08
|
Enter the program
activity title
|
|
|
|
|
Enter the program
activity title
|
|
|
|
|
Budgetary Main Estimates (gross)
|
4,765.5
|
4,700.6
|
4,458.8
|
4,416.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter the program
activity title
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-budgetary Main
Estimates (gross)
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Respendable
revenue
|
2,877.6
|
2,778.6
|
2,618.4
|
2,596.3
|
Total Main Estimates
|
1,897.9
|
1,932.0
|
1,850.4
|
1,830.6
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary
Estimates
|
|
|
|
|
Add
in item
|
22.1
|
. . . . .
|
(5.1)
|
4.4
|
Add
in item
|
50.1
|
(50.0)
|
(20.8)
|
(21.2)
|
Budget Announcement
|
|
|
|
|
Add in item
|
. . . . .
|
(37.3)
|
. . . . .
|
. . . . .
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
Board Vote 15
12
|
1.2
|
. . . . .
|
. . . . .
|
. . . . .
|
Employee Benefit Plan (EBP)12
|
1.5
|
. . . . .
|
. . . . .
|
. . . . .
|
Total Adjustments
|
74.9
|
(87.3)
|
(25.9)
|
(16.8)
|
Total Planned Spending
|
1,972.813
|
1,844.7
|
1,824.5
|
1,813.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Planned Spending
|
1,972.8
|
1,844.7
|
1,824.5
|
1,813.8
|
Less: Non-respendable
revenue
|
30.7
|
30.8
|
30.8
|
30.8
|
Plus: Cost of services received without charge
|
20.2
|
20.1
|
20.1
|
20.1
|
Net Cost of Department
|
1,962.3
|
1,834.0
|
1,813.8
|
1,803.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full-time Equivalents
|
10,942
|
10,891
|
10,882
|
10,873
|
Departments
must provide a short
paragraph with the Planned Spending table explaining the
spending trend, particularly as it relates to its plans and priorities over the
next three years.
Table 2: Program Activities
The following table provides
resource information for the Estimates year only. Once completed, only the
columns with content need to be displayed. The Total Main Estimates and Total
Planned Spending amounts must be identical to the amounts displayed in Table 1.
2005–06
|
|
Budgetary
|
Non-budgetary
|
|
Program Activity (PA)
|
Operating
|
Capital
|
Grants and Contributions
|
Gross
|
Revenue
|
Net
|
Loans, Investments, and Advances
|
Total Main Estimates
|
Adjustments (Planned Spending not in
Main Estimates)
|
Total Planned Spending
|
PA title
|
XX
|
. . .
|
XX
|
XX
|
. . .
|
XX
|
. . .
|
XX
|
XX
|
XX
|
PA title
|
XX
|
XX
|
. . .
|
XX
|
. . .
|
XX
|
. . .
|
XX
|
. . .
|
XX
|
PA title
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
XX
|
XX
|
. . .
|
XX
|
. . .
|
XX
|
PA title
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
XX
|
XX
|
. . .
|
XX
|
Total
|
XX
|
XX
|
XX
|
XX
|
XX
|
XX
|
XX
|
XX
|
XX
|
XX
|
Table 3:
Voted and Statutory Items Listed in the Main Estimates
The following example of voted and
statutory items basically replicates the departmental summary table listed in
the Main Estimates. This table provides the reader with an alternative display
of resource information. Resources are presented to Parliament in this format.
Parliament approves the voted funding and the statutory information is provided
for information purposes.
Vote
or
Statutory Item
|
Truncated
Vote or Statutory Wording
|
Current
Main Estimates
|
Previous
Main Estimates
|
1
|
Operating
expenditures
|
x,xxx.x
|
x,xxx.x
|
5
|
Capital expenditures
|
x,xxx.x
|
x,xxx.x
|
10
|
Grants and
contributions
|
x,xxx.x
|
x,xxx.x
|
(S)
|
Minister of
XXX—Salary and motor car allowance
|
x,xxx.x
|
x,xxx.x
|
(S)
|
Contributions to
employee benefit plans
|
x,xxx.x
|
x,xxx.x
|
|
Total Department
|
x,xxx.x
|
x,xxx.x
|
Departments
are to provide a brief explanation of any major differences between the current
and previous year.
Table 4:
Services Received Without Charges
This table
is designed to show the net cost of a department. It begins with
the gross
planned spending, adds services received without charge, and finally adds or
subtracts respendable and non-respendable revenue to arrive at the net cost of
the department.
($ millions)
|
2005–06
|
Net Planned
Spending
(Total Main Estimates plus Adjustments, as per the Planned Spending table)
|
1,844.7
|
Plus: Services Received Without Charge
|
|
Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada
|
12.6
|
Contributions covering the employer’s share of employees’ insurance
premiums and expenditures paid by the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
(excluding revolving funds)
|
3.8
|
Workers’ compensation coverage provided by Social Development Canada
|
2.8
|
Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by the
Department of Justice Canada
|
0.9
|
|
20.1
|
Less: Non-respendable Revenue
|
30.8
|
2005–06 Net Cost of
the Department
|
1,834.0
|
|
|
|
-
Accommodations provided by Public
Works and Governments
Services Canada can be obtained from Ruth Merkley by
telephone at (613) 949-1855 or by e-mail at
Ruth.Merkley@pwgsc.gc.ca
.
-
Workers’ compensation coverage
provided by Social
Development Canada can be obtained from Mitch Temelini at
(613) 997-2791.
-
Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided
by the Department of Justice Canada can be obtained from Arjun Patil at
(613) 954-5615.
- The amount to be used for government
payments to employee insurance plans, such as the Public Service Health Plan
and the Public Service Dental Plan, is eight per cent of the
personnel input factor.
Table 5: Summary of Capital
Spending by
Program Activity
($ millions)
|
Forecast
Spending
2005–06
|
Planned
Spending
2005–06
|
Planned
Spending
2006–07
|
Planned
Spending
2007–08
|
Enter the program
activity title
|
304.7
|
279.5
|
308.1
|
278.7
|
Enter program
activity title
|
66.1
|
66.1
|
56.1
|
56.1
|
Enter program
activity title
|
10.0
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
Enter program
activity title
|
. . .
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
Total
|
380.8
|
355.6
|
374.2
|
344.8
|
Note:
Departments must
identify capital expenditures for revolving funds whether or
not they are hidden within a program activity.
Table 6: Loans, Investments, and Advances
(Non-budgetary)
This table is designed to display
the loans, investments, and advances (the non-budgetary planned spending) a
department is responsible
for. Enter the non-budgetary information first by
program activity and describe the loan, investment, or advance.
($ millions)
|
Forecast
Spending
2005–06
|
Planned
Spending
2005–06
|
Planned
Spending
2006–07
|
Planned
Spending
2007–08
|
Enter the program
activity title
|
|
|
|
|
Describe the loan, investment, or advance
|
4.7
|
5.3
|
7.3
|
10.0
|
Describe the loan,
investment, or advance
|
5.3
|
4.7
|
2.7
|
. . .
|
Repeat the process
as often as necessary
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
For those
departments that generate revenue, the following table identifies the source(s)
of respendable and non-respendable revenue at the program activity level.
Respendable revenue consists of all non-tax revenue that
will be credited to
the department’s Vote. Non-respendable revenue consists of all non-tax
revenue that will be credited to the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Respendable
Revenue
($
millions)
|
Forecast
Revenue
2005–06
|
Planned
Revenue
2005–06
|
Planned
Revenue
2006–07
|
Planned
revenue
2007–08
|
Enter the first program activity
title
Enter source(s) of respendable revenue
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1
|
1,700.0
|
1,500.0
|
1,235.4
|
1,100.0
|
Item 2
|
1,100.0
|
1,200.0
|
1,300.0
|
1,400.0
|
|
2,800.0
|
2,700.0
|
2,535.4
|
2,500.0
|
Enter the second program activity
title
|
|
|
|
|
Enter source(s) of respendable revenue
|
77.6
|
78.6
|
83.0
|
96.3
|
Total Respendable
Revenue*
|
2,877.6
|
2,778.6
|
2,618.4
|
2,596.3
|
*
The total respendable and non-respendable revenue
should match to a corresponding line in Table 1: Departmental Planned
Spending. If they do not, departments must explain why.
Non-respendable Revenue
|
($ millions)
|
Forecast
Revenue
2005–06
|
Planned
Revenue
2005–06
|
Planned
Revenue
2006–07
|
Planned
revenue
2007–08
|
Enter the first program activity
title
Enter source(s) of non-respendable revenue
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1
|
5.2
|
5.2
|
5.2
|
5.2
|
Item 2
|
10.3
|
10.3
|
10.3
|
10.3
|
|
15.5
|
15.5
|
15.5
|
15.5
|
Enter the second program activity
title
|
|
|
|
|
Enter source(s) of non-respendable
revenue
|
15.2
|
15.3
|
15.3
|
15.3
|
Total Non-respendable Revenue
|
30.7
|
30.8
|
30.8
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Respendable and
Non-respendable Revenue*
|
2,908.3
|
2,809.4
|
2,649.2
|
2,627.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
The total
respendable and non-respendable revenue should match to a corresponding line in
Table 1: Departmental Planned Spending. If they do not, departments must explain
why
.
Statement of Operations
This table
refers to the operating surplus or deficit of a revolving fund and
not
to cash.
($ millions)
|
Forecast
2005–06
|
Planned
2005–06
|
Planned
2006–07
|
Planned
2007–08
|
Respendable Revenue
|
4.7
|
5.1
|
5.3
|
5.2
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
1.9
|
1.9
|
1.9
|
1.9
|
Depreciation
|
1.0
|
.9
|
.9
|
1.0
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
.2
|
.2
|
.2
|
.2
|
Administrative
and support services
|
.3
|
.3
|
.3
|
.3
|
Utilities, materials, and supplies
|
.4
|
.4
|
.4
|
.4
|
Marketing
|
.3
|
.3
|
.3
|
.2
|
Interest
|
.4
|
.4
|
.2
|
.3
|
|
4.5
|
4.4
|
4.2
|
4.3
|
Surplus (Deficit)
|
.2
|
.7
|
1.1
|
.9
|
Since the table above refers to the
Revolving Fund’s operating
surplus or deficit and not to cash requirements, the
Fund has been calculated through accrual accounting. Therefore, the cash
expenditures in the estimates do not affect the operating balance, and other
items that must be considered when calculating the surplus or deficit do not
require a direct cash outlay. The two
can be reconciled as follows:
Statement of Cash Flows
($ millions)
|
Forecast
2005–06
|
Planned
2005–06
|
Planned
2006–07
|
Planned
2007–08
|
Surplus (Deficit)*
|
.2
|
.7
|
1.1
|
.9
|
Add non-cash items
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation/amortization
|
.9
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
.9
|
Others (define)
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of depreciable assets
|
(3.0)
|
(1.3)
|
(.6)
|
(.7)
|
Cash Surplus (requirement)
|
(1.9)
|
.4
|
1.5
|
1.1
|
*
Repeat the Surplus (Deficit) line from the table above.
Projected Use of Authority
($ millions)
|
Forecast
2005–06
|
Planned
2005–06
|
Planned
2006–07
|
Planned
2007–08
|
Authority
14
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drawdown
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at April 1
|
(2.9)
|
(4.8)
|
(4.4)
|
(2.9)
|
Projected surplus
(drawdown)*
|
(1.9)
|
.4
|
1.5
|
1.1
|
|
(4.8)
|
(4.4)
|
(2.9)
|
(1.8)
|
Projected Balance at March 31
|
3.2
|
3.6
|
5.1
|
6.2
|
*
This line matches the Cash Surplus line from the
table above.
|
Since the table above refers to the Revolving Fund’s
operating surplus or deficit and not to cash requirements, the Fund has been
calculated through accrual accounting.
Therefore, the cash expenditures in the
estimates do not affect the operating balance, and other items that must be
considered when calculating the surplus or deficit do not require a direct cash
outlay. The two
can be reconciled as follows:
This table is designed to explain
the distribution of funding to a department at the branch or sector level.
2005–06
|
($ millions)
|
Program Activity Title
|
Program Activity Title
|
Program Activity Title
|
Program Activity Title
|
Total Planned Spending
|
Branch/sector name
|
600.3
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
600.3
|
Branch/sector name
|
. . .
|
244.4
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
244.4
|
Branch/sector name
|
250.0
|
. . .
|
253.0
|
.
. .
|
503.0
|
Branch/sector name
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
125.5
|
125.5
|
Branch/sector name
|
. . .
|
25.5
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
25.5
|
Branch/sector name
|
125.5
|
100.2
|
. . .
|
120.3
|
346.0
|
Total
|
975.8
|
470.1
|
253.0
|
245.8
|
1,844.7
|
The
User Fees Act
took
effect March 31, 2004, with the aim of increasing accountability and
parliamentary engagement in the oversight and implementation of user fees. In
light of the new legislation, the 2003
Policy on
Service Standards for
External Fees
will be rationalized to ensure full compatibility. The two
frameworks, however, are already fully in accord with respect to the principle
of enhancing accountability and maintaining the highest possible degree of
transparency in reporting to Parliament and the public.
To this end, departments with
planned user fee initiatives must complete the template entitled “Planned User
Fee Activities for New or
Amended Fees.” User fee activities will be determined
by the definition provided in the
User Fees Act
.
Each department is required to
report its planned user fee activities and include information relating to type
and fee-setting authority of the planned fee, the reason for the introduction
of or amendment to the planned fee, the planned effective date, and the planned
consultation and review processes.
Each department is also encouraged
to provide hyperlinks, where applicable and available, to its Web site for more
detailed information.
Name of User Fee
|
Fee Type
|
Fee-setting
Authority
|
Reason for Planned
Introduction of or Amendment to Fee
|
Effective Date of
Planned Change
|
Consultation and Review
Process Planned
|
For any planned user fee initiative (as defined by the
User
Fees Act
):
give the name of the user fee to be
introduced or amended; and
specify if it is “New” or “Amending”
|
Identify the type of fee
e.g.
Regulatory Service (R)
or
Other Goods and Services (O)
A regulatory fee relates to an activity undertaken by a
department that is integral to the effectiveness of a program and successful
achievement of the program mandate requires moderating, directing, testing,
or approving the actions of external parties.
|
Indicate the fee-setting authority that will be used
e.g.
. Financial Administration Act
. Oceans Act
. Passport Services Fees Regulations
|
Briefly describe the
rationale for the new fee or the reason for
the fee amendment
e.g.
. cost
increase or decrease
. inflation
. volume change
. part of fundamental service review
. part of ongoing review cycle
|
Identify the year that the new or amended fee is to take effect
e.g.
. 2005–06
and/or
.
2006–07
and/or
. 2007–08
|
Briefly describe the key planned consultation activities and
review process in respect of the associated requirements in the
User Fees
Act
|
Departments are encouraged to supplement the template with
hyperlinks to their respective Web sites that contain additional detail.
Table
11: Major Regulatory Initiatives
Regulatory initiatives result in
the making of
regulations by the Governor-in-Council, a minister, or an
administrative agency.
This table should consist of a
list of initiatives that the department expects to submit for legal examination
or final approval. It should also contain information on proposed
major
or
significant
initiatives that are scheduled for implementation during
the planning period.
The
department is to decide
what constitutes a major or significant regulatory
initiative. However, the following two points can be used as a general
guideline.
-
A
major
regulation has
expenditures in excess of $50 million or expenditures greater than
$100,000 with a low degree of public acceptance.
- A
significant
regulation is one that has an annual impact on the economy of $10 million
or more. It may adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety,
provincial, local,
or Aboriginal governments or it may create a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or planned by another federal department. It may
materially alter the authorized levels of departments or the budgetary impact
of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or it may alter the government’s priorities;
or it may raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates.
Note:
When major or significant regulatory initiatives overlap
several departments, it shall be the
responsibility of the lead department
to ensure the appropriate horizontal co-ordination is carried out with the
other departments.
This information replaces the
material provided in the
Federal Regulatory Plan
. The following example
links regulations and
expected results. The department may wish to direct the
reader to view detailed information using alternative vehicles, such as
departmental Web sites.
Regulatory Initiatives
Regulations
|
Expected
Results
|
List the regulatory
initiatives that the department expects to submit for final approval and the
proposed initiatives that are scheduled for
implementation during the
planning period.
|
Based on the
corresponding Regulatory Initiative (first column), enter
what the
department expects to achieve
and
how
it plans to achieve it.
|
Table 12:
Details on Project Spending
The purpose of this table is to
identify departmental projects, as well as capital, lease, information
technology, and major Crown projects underway during the reporting period that
exceeded their delegated project approval level.
For further information on the
project level, refer to the
Project Approval
policy, Appendix E, located
within the framework established in the government’s
Project
Management
policy, and explain the allocation of resources.
Projects are defined as a set of
activities required to produce certain defined outputs or to accomplish specific
goals or objectives within a defined schedule and resource budget. A project
exists only for the duration of time required to complete its stated objectives
.
The government’s
Project Management
policy applies to any project
for which the federal government will
be:
-
the owner of the end
product;
or
- the prime user of the end
product; or
- the entity responsible for
delivering the product, including managing a contract or contracts for that
purpose.
Information on project phases and
project approval authorities is found at
http://publiservice.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pm-gp/category-categorie.asp?Language=EN&site=PMD&id=081
.
This table is not intended to
report project-like activities or initiatives funded through the
Policy on
Transfer Payments
.
In order to reduce the
volume of material in the printed RPP, departments are to provide a summary
listing of projects that have exceeded their delegated project approval level,
along with the following
statement: “Further information on these projects can
be found at
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.”
Departments are then
required to fill in a template for this table. The template is available on the
Secretariat’s Web site (along with the guidelines) at
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.
Note that the template is not to be inserted into the
printed document. Each department is to post its completed template on its
Web
site at the same time it posts the tabled RPP.
Departments must provide a URL address for the template,
along with their print-ready material. This will allow the Secretariat to
provide a link to the appropriate information.
The following
example of the
template lists each individual project by program activity. Departments should
identify the project by applicable phase. Typically, project phases include
Initial Planning and Identification; Project Definition; Project
Implementation; and Project Close-out. Note that Treasury Board approvals are
coincident with the Project Definition and Project Implementation phases.
($ millions)
|
Current
Estimated Total Cost
|
Forecast
Spending to March 31, 2005
|
Planned
Spending
2005–06
|
Planned
Spending
2006–07
|
Planned
Spending
2007–08
|
Future
Years’ Spending Requirement
|
Enter
the
department’s program activity title
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter the project
name and project phase
|
12.5
|
0.5
|
2.5
|
2.5
|
2.5
|
4.5
|
Enter the
department’s second program activity title
(if
applicable)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter the project
name and project phase
|
20.0
|
16.4
|
1.5
|
1.6
|
0.5
|
. . .
|
Repeat the above process as often as necessary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 13: Status Report on Major
Crown Projects
Major Crown projects (MCPs)
have cost estimates that exceed $100 million and are considered to be high
risk by the Treasury Board. The Board may also direct that certain projects
with a total cost of less than $100 million but that are considered to be
high risk be designated as MCPs.
In order to reduce the
volume of material in the RPP, departments are to provide a summary listing of
all designated MCPs,
along with the following statement: “Further information
on these major Crown projects can be found at
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.”
Departments are then
required to fill in a template for this table. The template is available on the
Secretariat’s Web site (along with the guidelines) at
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.
Note that the template is not to be inserted into the
printed document. Each
department is to post its completed template on its Web
site at the same time it posts the tabled RPP.
Departments must provide a
URL address for the template, along with their print-ready material. This will
allow the Secretariat to provide a link to the appropriate information.
This table is not intended to
report project-like
activities or initiatives funded through the
Policy
on
Transfer Payments
.
Only lead departments should
prepare a status report. A current list of designated MCPs is located at
http://publiservice.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pm-gp/mcpl-lgpe/mcpl-gpel-2004-Jul-8_e.asp
.
Projects exceeding
$100 million but that have not been assessed as high risk or designated as
MCPs should not be included in this table.
The template information found on
the Web site should, at a minimum, consist of the following:
1.
Description
2.
Project Phase (Initial Planning and Identification; Project
Definition; Project Implementation; or Project Close-out)
3.
Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies
4.
Prime and Major Subcontractor
5.
Major Milestones
6.
Progress Report and Explanations of Variances
7.
Industrial Benefits
8.
Summary of
Non-recurring Expenditures
Details on each of these
requirements are outlined below.
1. Description
This subsection is used to describe
what the MCP is and explain why it is being undertaken.
2. Project Phase
This subsection identifies the
phase the MCP is currently at, i.e. Initial Planning and Identification;
Project Definition; Project Implementation; or Project Close-out.
3. Leading and Participating
Departments and Agencies
This subsection lists the participants (departments)
associated with the MCP.
Lead Department or Agency
|
Enter the Leading Department’s or Agency’s
name
|
Contracting Authority
|
Enter the Department’s or Agency’s name
|
Participating Departments and Agencies
|
Enter the Departments’ or
Agencies’ names
|
4.
Prime and Major Subcontractors
This subsection lists all
contractors associated with the development of the MCP.
Prime Contractor
|
Enter the name of the company and its
address, giving the city, province, and country (where applicable)
|
Major Subcontractor(s)
|
Enter the name of each company and its
address, giving the city, province, and country (where applicable)
|
5.
Major Milestones
This subsection lists the major milestones associated with
the progress of the MCP.
Major
Milestones
|
Date
|
List milestones relating to the progress of
the project
|
List the dates
the milestones are expected
to occur
|
6. Progress Report and
Explanations of Variances
This subsection is to provide
the reader with a progress report
on how the MCP is progressing. It should also
bring attention to any variances in cost since the beginning of
the project.
For example:
- Initially, the Treasury Board
approved the project name with an estimated
cost of $XX million.
- On mm/dd/yyyy, the Treasury
Board granted additional monies to the project name due to... The total cost is
now estimated at $XX million.
- On mm/dd/yyyy, enter the
department’s name used internal resources of
$XX million to cover cost overruns for project name.
- The project name is currently
running on/over/under budget [provide explanations].
- The project name is to be
completed by...
7. Industrial
Benefits
This subsection is designed to
inform the reader of the benefits to Canadian industry as a whole and indicate
the regions that will benefit from the project. A short list of the regions and
the monies to be spent there should be displayed. For example:
Canadian industry in the following
regions will benefit from the project name
project:
Region
|
Cash Benefits
|
Atlantic Canada
|
$40 million
|
Quebec
|
$295 million
|
Ontario
|
$135 million
|
Western Canada
|
$80 million
|
8. Summary of
Non-recurring Expenditures
This table was designed to
inform the reader of one-time or non-recurring expenditures associated with
each MCP. The amounts displayed are cumulative.
($ millions)
|
Current Estimated Total
Expenditure
|
Forecast Expenditures to
March 31, 2004
|
Planned Spending
2005–06
|
Future Years’ Requirements
|
Enter the project name and the
specific operation incurring the one-time expenditure
|
4.9
|
4.9
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
Enter the project name and the
specific operation incurring the one-time expenditure
|
191.7
|
67.5
|
1.5
|
122.7
|
Table 14: Details on Transfer
Payments Programs
(TPPs)
The
Policy on Transfer
Payments
states: “For each transfer payment program with
transfers in excess of five million dollars, the Departmental Report on Plans
and Priorities must include supplementary descriptive material, such as stated
objectives, expected results and outcomes, and milestones for achievement.”
All
departments responsible for administering TPPs must
complete
one
template for
each
TPP, including statutory transfer
payment programs, where total transfer payments
exceed five million dollars
during the reporting year.
NOTE:
Conditional grants to foundations are to be reported
separately from TPPs (see Table 16 for instructions on conditional grants).
What are Transfer
Payments?
Transfer payments are payments
made based on appropriations for which no goods or services are directly
received. The three main types of transfer payments are grants, contributions,
and other transfer payments.
A
transfer payment program
is defined as a collection of transfer payments (either voted or statutory)
aimed at
a common objective or set of objectives. Their purpose is to further
departmental objectives and strategic outcomes and, as such, relate to
departmental program activities (that reside in the PAA). TPPs leverage the strengths
of communities and organizations to achieve specific government policy
outcomes.
What to Submit
In order to reduce the
volume of material in the RPP, departments are to provide a list in their RPPs
of TPPs that exceeded $5 million in the Estimates year, along with the
following statement: “Further information on these transfer payment programs
can be found at
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.”
Departments are then
required to fill in a template for this table. The template is available on the
Secretariat’s Web site (along with the guidelines) at
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.
Note that the template is
not to be inserted into the printed document. Each department is to post its
completed template on its Web site at the same time it posts the tabled RPP.
Departments must provide a
URL address for the template, along with their print-ready material. This will allow
the Secretariat to provide a link to the appropriate information.
The following table is an example
of the template.
1) Name of Transfer Payment Program
|
2) Start Date
|
3) End Date
|
4) Total Funding
|
5) Purpose of Transfer Payment Program
|
6) Objective(s), Expected result(s), and
Outcomes
|
|
7) Forecast
Spending
2005–06
|
8) Planned
Spending
2005–06
|
9) Planned
Spending
2006–07
|
10) Planned
Spending
2007–08
|
11) Program Activity (PA)
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
12) Total Grants
|
|
|
|
|
12) Total Contributions
|
|
|
|
|
12) Total Other Transfer Payments
|
|
|
|
|
12) Total PA
|
|
|
|
|
13) Total TPP
|
|
|
|
|
(a) For TPPs reporting through several PAs,
repeat the relevant rows for each additional PA.
The following information
provides additional direction in completing Table 14:
1.
Name of Transfer Payment Program
: Provide the name of the program under which the Terms and
Conditions (Ts&Cs) were approved and indicate whether the payments are
statutory or voted.
2.
Start Date
: Indicate
the initial date the program started.
3.
End Date
: Indicate the
date the program will sunset (the date until payments are expected to be
made - not the date
the Ts&Cs need to be renewed).
4.
Total Funding
:
Indicate the total amount allocated by the department to the TPP since its
inception (start date to end of last fiscal year).
5.
Purpose of Transfer Payment Program
: Describe the nature of the TPP (reason for its
establishment) and provide details on the type of transfer payments involved.
6.
Objective(s), Expected Result(s), and Outcomes
: Provide the goals, planned results, and effects of the
TPP (these should be consistent with the PAA).
7.
Forecast Spending 2004–05
: Provide the anticipated amount to be spent in the
fiscal year (what
you expect to see printed in the Public Accounts).
8.
Planned Spending 2005–06
:
Provide the estimated amount to be spent in the fiscal year.
9.
Planned Spending 2006–07
:
Provide the estimated amount to be spent in the reporting year.
10.
Planned Spending 2007–08
:
Provide the estimated amount to be spent in the fiscal year.
11.
Program Activity
:
Provide the name of the relevant Program Activity (PA).
12.
Total Grants, Total Contributions, Total Other Transfer
Payments, and Total PA
: Complete the
appropriate rows by providing the total dollar figure in each column.
13.
Total Transfer Payment Program
: Provide the total dollar figure for each column.
Table 15: Foundations (Conditional
Grants)
Budget 2003, Chapter 7,
identified measures to improve the transparency and public accountability of
foundations funded
through conditional grants and included mandatory
requirements for reporting in RPPs and DPRs.
Accordingly, each department
responsible for administering funding agreements with foundations must
incorporate into its RPP significant expected results to be achieved by the
foundations and situate these results within the overall plans and priorities
of the department.
All
departments responsible for administering conditional
grant agreements must complete
one
template for
each
foundation,
each
year, for the
duration of the funding agreement
.
What are Conditional Grants?
Conditional grants are transfer
payments generally made to
not-for-profit organizations for use over a number
of years (or in perpetuity), for a specified purpose, pursuant to conditions contained
in a funding agreement. In some cases, these organizations are referred to as
foundations.
Because these organizations
receive funding to be used over a number of years (or in perpetuity),
departments are to report not only when the funding occurs but also throughout
the life of the funding agreement.
What to submit
In
order to reduce the volume of material in the RPP, departments are to provide a
summary list of conditional grants in their RPPs, along with the following
statement: “Further information on these conditional grants can be found at
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.”
Departments are then
required to fill in a template for this table. The template is available on the
Secretariat’s Web site (along with the guidelines) at
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.
Note that the template is not to be inserted into the
printed document. Each department is to post its completed template on its Web
site at the same time it posts the tabled RPP.
Departments must provide a
URL address for the template, along with their print-ready material. This will
allow the Secretariat to provide a link to the appropriate information.
The following table is an
example of the template.
1) Name of Foundation
|
2)
Start Date
|
3) End Date
|
4) Total Funding
|
5) Purpose of Funding
|
6) Objective(s), Expected Result(s), and
Outcomes (within departmental overall plans)
|
7) Summary of Annual Plans
|
|
8) Forecast
Spending
2005–06
|
9) Planned
Spending
2005–06
|
10) Planned
Spending
2006–07
|
11) Planned
Spending
2007–08
|
12) Conditional Grant(s)
|
|
|
|
|
13) URL to Foundation Site
|
The
following information provides additional direction in
completing Table 15:
1.
Name of Foundation
:
Provide the name of the foundation.
2.
Start Date
: Indicate
the date the first agreement was signed/started.
3.
End Date
: Indicate the
date the last agreement terminates/closes, if available.
4.
Total Funding
:
Indicate the total amount funded to the foundation since the start date.
5.
Purpose of Funding
:
Describe the nature of the conditional grant administered by the foundation.
6.
Objective(s), Expected Result(s), and Outcomes
: Provide the goals, expected results,
and effects of the
program and situate these within the overall plans and priorities of the
department (these should be consistent with the PAA).
7.
Summary of Annual Plans
:
Summarize the plans provided by the foundation in its annual corporate plans.
8.
Forecast Spending 2004–05
: Provide the anticipated amount to be spent in the fiscal year by the
department.
9.
Planned Spending 2005–06
:
Provide the estimated amount to be spent in the reporting year by the
department.
10.
Planned Spending 2006–07
:
Provide the estimated
amount to be spent in the fiscal year by the department.
11.
Planned Spending 2007–08
:
Provide the estimated amount to be spent in the fiscal year by the department.
12.
Conditional Grant(s)
:
Provide the total dollar figure in each column, if applicable.
13.
URL to Foundation Site
:
Provide a link to the foundation’s site to facilitate access to further
information on the organization and its funding.
Table 16:
Alternative Service Delivery
This purpose of this table is to
display proposed initiatives to deliver programs or services that contribute
significantly to the achievement of a department’s mandate using alternative
departmental forms and delivery mechanisms.
These reporting requirements apply
to federal organizations listed in schedules I, I.1, and II of the
Financial
Administration Act
, except where there is a statutory exemption (e.g.
Canada Revenue Agency).
Departments are to report
significant new Alternative Service Delivery (ASD) initiatives or renewal of
existing ASD initiatives that are proposed or planned over the next
three years.
A significant initiative is one
that incurs annual spending in excess of $20 million or meets
any of the
following criteria. The initiative:
- poses a significant risk to
the continuity of service delivery to Canadians;
- represents a substantial
change to the existing mix of industrial and regional benefits;
- includes sensitive issues in
financial or human resources management that require Treasury Board direction;
- has an impact on the rights
or entitlements of Canadians;
- contributes significantly to the
achievement of the department’s mandate; or
- affects official languages.
Possible departmental forms and
delivery mechanisms include special operating agencies, legislated service
agencies, departmental corporations, Crown corporations, administrative tribunals,
shared governance corporations, partnerships and collaborative arrangements,
contracting out, and other options described on the Secretariat’s ASD Web site
at
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/asd-dmps
.
In order to reduce the
volume of material in the RPP, departments are to provide a summary list of
programs and services that plan to use ASD initiatives over the next three
years. For example:
Over the next three years,
Department X will use significant new ASD initiatives or will be renewing
existing ASD initiatives for the following programs and/or services.
1. Name of program or
service
2. Name of program or service
3. Name of program or service, etc.
Further information on these ASD initiatives can be found
at
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.
|
Departments
are then required to fill in a template for this table. The template is
available on the Secretariat’s Web site (along with the guidelines) at
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.
Note that the template is not to be inserted into the
printed document. Each department is to post its completed template on its Web
site at the same time it posts the tabled RPP.
Departments must provide a
URL address for the template, along with their print-ready material. This will
allow the Secretariat to provide a link to the appropriate information.
The following table is an example
of the template.
Name of ASD
Initiative
|
Current Status
|
Projected
Implementation
Date
|
Contact
|
Name of program or service
|
New initiative or renewal, type
of ASD options being considered, stage of development, key milestones
|
Start-up date (if exact date is
not known, enter a fiscal year)
|
Responsible manager’s name,
phone number, and e-mail address
|
Name of program or service
|
|
|
|
Name of program or service
|
|
|
|
Add a
separate row for each proposed ASD initiative.
Table 17: Horizontal Initiatives
The objective of reporting on
horizontal initiatives is to
provide parliamentarians, the public and
government with an overall picture of public expenditures, plans, and
priorities for all
major
horizontal initiatives.
A
horizontal initiative is an initiative in which partners15
from two or more organizations have
established a formal funding agreement
(e.g. Memorandum to Cabinet, Treasury
Board submission, federal-provincial agreement) to work toward the achievement
of shared outcomes16 .
Examples of horizontal initiatives include the Climate Change Initiative,
Canada’s Drug Strategy, and the Youth Employment Strategy.
A Horizontal Initiative template
must be completed for all
major
horizontal initiatives that:
-
have been allocated federal
funds that exceed $100 million for the entire initiative; or
-
are key to the achievement of
government priorities; or
-
have a high public profile.
The department whose minister sponsored the Memorandum to
Cabinet or other formal agreement is responsible for submitting the Horizontal
Initiative Template to the Secretariat17 on behalf of all federal partners.
Federal
partners that have received significant funding to deliver public programs are
responsible for providing the lead department with planned expenditures and
results information and for contributing to the completion of the Horizontal
Initiative Template.
If a
department’s involvement in a horizontal initiative is key to the achievement
of its strategic outcome(s), the department should reflect this in the main
body of the RPP.
In
order to reduce the volume of material in the printed RPP, departments are to
provide a summary list in the RPP of horizontal initiatives they are involved
in, along with the following
statement: “Further information on these
horizontal initiatives can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp.”
Departments are then
required to fill in a template for this table. The template is available on the
Secretariat’s Web site (along
with the guidelines) at
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.
Note that the template is not to be inserted into the
printed document. Each department is to post its
completed template on its Web
site at the same time it posts the tabled RPP.
Departments must provide a
URL address for the template, along with their print-ready material. This will
allow the Secretariat to provide a link to the appropriate information.
$ millions
Horizontal Initiative Template (RPP)
|
1) Name
of Horizontal Initiative
|
2) Name
of Lead Department(s)
|
3) Start
Date of the Horizontal Initiative
|
4) End
Date of the Horizontal Initiative
|
5) Total
Federal Funding Allocation
|
6)
Description of the Horizontal Initiative
|
7) Shared Outcome(s)
|
8)
Governance Structure(s)
|
9)
Federal Partners
Involved in Each Program
|
10) Names
of Programs
|
11) Total
Allocation
|
12)
Planned Spending for 2005–06
|
13)
Expected Results for 2005–06
|
1.
|
a.
|
$
|
$
|
|
|
b.
|
$
|
$
|
|
|
c.
|
$
|
$
|
|
2.
|
a.
|
$
|
$
|
|
|
b.
|
$
|
$
|
|
|
c.
|
$
|
$
|
|
3.
|
a.
|
$
|
$
|
|
|
b.
|
$
|
$
|
|
|
|
Total $
|
Total $
|
|
14)
Results to be Achieved by Non-federal Partners (if
applicable)
|
15) Contact Information
|
16)
Approved by
|
17) Date
Approved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information provided in fields 1–11 is likely to remain the
same throughout the reporting cycle of a horizontal initiative. Should changes
occur, departments are responsible for updating
this information.
The following information provides
additional direction in completing Table 17:
1.
Name of Horizontal Initiative
: Provide the name of the horizontal initiative under which
the Memorandum to Cabinet or other formal agreement was submitted, e.g.
Canada’s Drug Strategy—Renewed.
2.
Name of Lead Department(s)
: Provide the name of the lead department(s), e.g. Health
Canada.
3.
Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative
: Indicate the start date of the horizontal initiative. If
programs
have different start dates, please indicate the date when the first
program started.
4.
End Date of the Horizontal Initiative
: Indicate the end date of the horizontal initiative
funding allocation. If programs have different end dates, please indicate the
date when the last program will end. Please indicate “ongoing” if the
initiative has been allocated ongoing funding.
5.
Total Funding Allocated to the Initiative
: Indicate total federal funding allocated (start to end
date) to the horizontal initiative.
6.
Description of the Horizontal Initiative
: Provide a
brief description of the horizontal initiative,
including a rationale for the initiative, its linkages to government plans and
priorities, and objectives. Also, please provide electronic links to further
information where applicable.
7.
Shared Outcome(s)
: Outcomes are targeted results to be achieved by all
partners involved in the horizontal initiative. They indicate short- and
long-term benefits to Canadians. Good outcomes are measurable, directional in
nature, and provide some indication of the extent of change being pursued, e.g.
the availability of
illicit drugs and other harmful substances in Canada is reduced;
demand for elicit drugs and other harmful substances in Canada is reduced.
8.
Governance Structure(s)
:
Indicate the interdepartmental decision-making body and interdepartmental
committees and co-ordinating structures established by the partners involved in
the horizontal initiative, e.g. a ministers’/deputy ministers’/assistant deputy
ministers’ committee (decision-making body); a committee of directors general;
a management board; a secretariat; an external
advisory committee; or other.
9.
Federal Partners
Involved in Each Program
: Provide the name of each federal department involved in
the horizontal initiative, including lead departments.
Please add rows if
the space provided does not permit you to report all partners
.
10.
Names of Programs
:
Provide the names of key federal programs by partner funded under the
horizontal initiative. Please provide electronic links for further information
where applicable. Expenditure and results information
should be provided by
partner and by program.
Please add rows if the space provided does not
permit you to report all programs.
11.
Total Allocation
:
Indicate the total federal funding allocation (start to end date) per partner
and program for the duration of the initiative.
12.
Planned Spending for 2005–06
: Indicate the forecast spending for fiscal year 2005–06.
13.
Expected Results for 2005–06
: Indicate the planned results for fiscal year 2005–06.
14.
Results to be Achieved by Non-federal Partners (if
applicable)
: Indicate the expected
achievements of other, non-federal partners, if applicable. This should include
a discussion of each partner’s planned
expenditures and results in relation to
both its partnership arrangement and its strategic outcomes.
15.
Contact Information
:
Provide the contact information (address, phone number, and e-mail) of
the horizontal initiative manager who will be able to respond to inquiries on
the horizontal initiative.
16.
Approved by
: Indicate
the name of the person approving the horizontal initiative template.
17.
Date Approved
:
Indicate the date when the horizontal initiative template was approved.
|