Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat - Government of Canada
Skip to Side MenuSkip to Content Area
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
What's New About Us Policies Site Map Home

Part I
Part II
Part III-Reports on Plans and Priorities (RPP)
Part III-Departmental Performance Reports (DPR)
Supplementary
Estimates
Appropriation
Acts
The Estimates Process
Other
Supporting
Documents
Results for
Canadians
Alternate Format(s)
Printable Version

Guide for the Preparation of 2005-2006 Part III of the Estimates: RPP and DPR

Previous Table of Contents Next
Please note that the DPR portion of the 2005-2006 Guide is currently being updated. An information update and new DPR templates will be posted shortly on this website to explain updated reporting requirements for 2005-2006.

Table 10: User Fees

The User Fees Act took effect March 31, 2004 with the aim of increasing accountability and parliamentary engagement in the oversight and implementation of user fees. In light of the new legislation, the 2003 External Charging Policy will be rationalized to ensure full compatibility. The two frameworks, however, are already fully in accord with respect to the principle of enhancing accountability and maintaining the highest degree of transparency possible to Parliament and the public.

To this end, departments and agencies with planned user fee initiatives must complete the template entitled " Planned User Fee Activities for New or Amended Fees ". User fee activities will be determined by the definition provided in the User Fees Act .

The department is required to report its planned user fee activities and include information relating to type and fee setting authority of the planned fee, the reason for the planned fee introduction or amendment, the planned effective date and the planned consultation and review processes.

The department is also encouraged to provide hyperlinks, where applicable, and available, to their respective websites for more detailed information.

Name of User Fee

Fee Type

Fee Setting
Authority

Reason for Fee
Introduction or Amendment

Effective date of
planned change to take effect

Consultation & Review process Planned

For any planned user fee initiative (as defined by the User Fee Act ):

Express the name of the user fee to be introduced or amended and

Specify if "New" or "Amending"

Identify the type of fee

e.g.

Regulatory service (R)

or

Other Goods and Services (O) -

A regulatory fee relates to an activity undertaken by a department that is integral to the effectiveness of a program and successful achievement of the program mandate requires moderating, directing, testing, or approving the actions of external parties.

Express the fee setting authority that will be used

e.g.

. Financial Administration Act

. Oceans Act

. Passport Fees Regulations

Briefly describe the rationale for the new fee or the reason for the fee amendment

e.g.

. cost increase or decrease

. inflation

. volume change

. part of fundamental service review

. part of ongoing review cycle

Identify the year that the new or amended fee is to take effect

e.g.

. 2005-2006

and/or

. 2006-2007

and/or

. 2007-2008

Briefly, describe the key planned consultation activities and review process in respect of the associated requirements contained in the User Fees Act .

Departments are encouraged to supplement the template with hyperlinks to their respective web sites that contain additional detail.

Table 11: Major Regulatory Initiatives

Regulatory Initiatives result in the making of regulations by the Governor-in-Council, a Minister or an Administrative Agency.

This table should consist of a listing of initiatives that the department expects to submit for legal examination or final approval. It should also contain information on proposed major or significant initiatives that are scheduled for implementation during the planning period.

The department is to decide what constitutes a major or significant Regulatory Initiative. However, the following two bullets can be used as a general guideline.

  • A major regulation has expenditures in excess of $50M or expenditures greater than $100K with a low degree of public acceptance.
  • A significant regulation is one that has an annual impact on the economy of $10M or more. It may adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, provincial, local or Aboriginal governments; or creates a serious inconsistency or otherwise interferes with an action taken or planned by another federal government department or agency. It may materially alter the authorized levels of departments; or the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates; or the Government's priorities.

Note: When major or significant Regulatory Initiatives overlap several departments, it shall be the responsibility of the lead department to ensure the appropriate horizontal co-ordination is carried out with the other departments.

This information replaces the material provided in the "Federal Regulatory Plan". The following example links Regulations and Planned Results. The department may wish to direct the reader to view detailed information using alternative vehicles such as departmental web sites.

Regulatory Initiatives

Regulations

Expected Results

List the regulatory initiatives that the department expects to submit for final approval and the proposed initiatives that are scheduled for implementation during the planning period.

Based on the corresponding Regulatory Initiative (first column) enter what the department expects to achieve and how it plans to achieve them.

Table 12: Details on Project Spending

The purpose of this table is to identify departmental projects, capital, lease, information technology and Major Crown projects underway during the reporting period, which exceed their delegated project approval level.

For further information on the project level, refer to the Project Approval Policy, Annex E located within the framework established in the government's project management policy suite and to explain the allocation of resources.

Projects are defined as a set of activities required to produce certain defined outputs, or to accomplish specific goals or objectives, within a defined schedule and resource budget. A project exists only for the duration of time required to complete its stated objectives . The Government's project management policy suite applies to any project for which the federal government will be:

  • the owner of the end-product; or,
  • the prime user of the end-product; or
  • the entity responsible for delivering the product, including managing a contract or contracts for that purpose.

Information on project phases and project approval authorities are found at http://publiservice.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pm-gp/category-categorie.asp?Language=EN&site=PMD&id=081 .

This table is not intended to report project-like activities or initiatives funded through the Transfer Payment Policy.

In order to reduce the volume of material in the printed RPP document, departments are to provide a summary listing of projects that have exceeded their delegated project approval level along with the following statement "Further information on these projects can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp ".

Departments are then required to fill-in a template for this table.   The template is available on the TBS web site (along with the guidelines) at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp .

Note, the template is not to be inserted into the printed document.   Departments are to post their completed template on their web site at the same time they post their tabled RPP document.

Departments must provide a URL address for the template along with their print-ready material.   This will allow TBS to link to the appropriate information.

The following example of the template lists each individual project by Program Activity. Departments should identify the project by applicable phase. Typically, project phases include: Initial Planning and Identification; Project Definition; Project Implementation; and Project Close-out. Note Treasury Board approvals are coincident with the Project Definition and Project Implementation phases.


  ($ millions)

Current Estimated Total Cost

Forecast Spending to March 31, 2005

Planned Spending
2005-2006

Planned Spending
2006-2007

Planned Spending
2007-2008

Future Year Spending Requirement


Enter the department's Program activity title

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enter the project name and project phase

12.5

0.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

4.5

Enter the department's second Program activity title (if applicable)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enter the project name and project phase

20.0

16.4

1.5

1.6

0.5

. . .


Repeat the above process

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Table 13: Status Report on Major Crown Projects

Major Crown Projects (MCP) have cost estimates that exceed $100 million and are considered high risk. The Treasury Board may also direct that certain projects, with a total cost of less than $100 million but considered to be high risk, be designated as a MCP.

In order to reduce the volume of material in the RPP, departments are to provide a summary listing of (designated) MCP(s) along with the following statement "Further information on these Major Crown Projects can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp ".

Departments are then required to fill-in a template for this table.   The template is available on the TBS web site (along with the guidelines) at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp .

Note, the template is not to be inserted into the printed document.   Departments are to post their completed template on their web site at the same time they post their tabled RPP document.

Departments must provide a URL address for the template along with their print-ready material.   This will allow TBS to link to the appropriate information.

This table is not intended to report project-like activities or initiatives funded through the Transfer Payment Policy.

Only lead departments should prepare a status report. A current list of designated Major Crown Projects is located at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rma/dpr/02-03/guidance/guide_e.asp#mcp

Projects exceeding $100 million, but that have not been assessed as high risk or designated as a MCP, should not be included in this table.

The template information found on the web site should, at a minimum, consist of the following:

  1. Description
  2. Project Phase (Initial Planning and Identification; Project Definition; Project Implementation; or Project Close-out)
  3. Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies
  4. Prime and Major Sub-Contractor
  5. Major Milestones
  6. Progress Report and Explanations of Variances
  7. Industrial Benefits
  8. Summary of non-recurring expenditures

Details on each of these requirements are outlined below:

1. Description

This sub-section is used to describe and/or explain what the Major Crown project is and why it is being done.

2. Project Phase

This sub-section identifies the phase the project is currently at: Initial Planning and Identification or Project Definition or Project Implementation or Project Close-out.

3. Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies

This sub-section lists the participants (departments) associated with the Major Crown project.

Lead Department or Agency:

Enter the Leading Department's or Agency's name

Contracting Authority:

Enter the Department's or Agency's name

Participating Departments and Agencies:

Enter the Department's or Agency's name(s)

4. Prime and Major Sub-Contractors

This sub-section lists all contractors associated with the development of the Major Crown project.

Prime Contractor:

Enter the name of the company and the address using the city, province and country (where applicable).

Major Sub-Contractors:

Enter the name of the company and the address using the city, province and country (where applicable).

5. Major Milestones

This sub-section lists the major milestones associated with the progress of the Major Crown project.

Major Milestones

Date

List milestones relating to the progress of the project.

List the date the milestone is expected to occur.

6. Progress Report and Explanations of Variances

This sub-section is to provide the reader with a progress report on how the Major Crown projects are doing. It should also bring attention to any variances in cost since the beginning of the project.

For example:

  • In the beginning, Treasury Board approved the project name with an estimated cost of $XX million.
  • On mm/dd/yyyy, Treasury Board granted additional monies to the project name due to ... the total cost is now estimated at $XX million.
  • On mm/dd/yyyy enter the department's name used internal resources for
    $XX million to cover cost overruns for project name.
  • The project name is currently running . . . on, over or under budget (provide explanations).
  • The project name is to be completed by ...

7. Industrial Benefits

This sub-section is designed to inform the reader of the benefits to the Canadian industry as a whole, as well as listing the regions that will benefit from the project. A short list of the regions and the monies to be spent there should be displayed. For example:

Canadian industry in the following regions of Canada will benefit from the project name project:

Region

Cash Benefits

Atlantic Canada

$40 million

Quebec

$295 million

Ontario

$135 million

Western Canada

$80 million

 

8. Summary of Non-recurring Expenditures

This table was designed to inform the reader of one-time or non-recurring expenditures associated with each Major Crown project. The amounts displayed are cumulative.

($ millions)

Current Estimated Total Expenditure

Forecast Expenditures to
March 31, 2004

Planned Spending
2005-2006

Future Years' Requirements

Enter the project name and the specific operation incurring the one-time expenditure

4.9

4.9

. . .

. . .

Enter the project name and the specific operation incurring the one-time expenditure

191.7

67.5

1.5

122.7

 

Table 14: Details on Transfer Payments Programs (TPPs)

The Policy on Transfer Payments states: " For each transfer payment program with transfers in excess of five million dollars, the Departmental Report on Plans and Priorities must include supplementary descriptive material, such as stated objectives, expected results and outcomes, and milestones for achievement ."

" All " departments responsible for administering TPPs must complete " one" template for "each" TPP, including statutory transfer payment programs, where total TPs exceeds five million dollars during the reporting year.

NOTE: Conditional Grants to Foundations are to be reported separately from TPP (see table 16 for instructions on Conditional Grants).

What are Transfer Payments (TP)?

Transfer payments are payments made based on appropriations for which no goods or services are directly received. The three main types of transfer payments are grants, contributions, and other transfer payments (OTP).

A Transfer Payment Program is defined as a collection of transfer payments (either voted or statutory) aimed at a common objective or set of objectives. Their purpose is "to further" departmental objectives and strategic outcomes and, as such, relate to departmental program activities (that reside in the PAA). TPPs leverage the strengths of communities and organizations to achieve specific government policy outcomes.

What to Submit

In order to reduce the volume of material in the RPP, departments are to provide a listing of TPPs that exceeded $5 million in the Estimates year along with the following statement "Further information on these Transfer Payment Programs can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp " in their RPP document.

Departments are then required to fill-in a template for this table.   The template is available on the TBS web site (along with the guidelines) at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp .

Note, the template is not to be inserted into the printed document.   Departments are to post their completed template on their web site at the same time they post their tabled RPP document.

Departments must provide a URL address for the template along with their print-ready material.   This will allow TBS to link to the appropriate information.

The following table is an example of the template.

1) Name of Transfer Payment Program:

2) Start Date:

3) End Date:

4) Total Funding:

5) Purpose of Transfer Payment Program:

6) Objective(s), expected result(s) and outcomes:

 

7) Forecast
Spending
2004-2005

8) Planned
Spending
2005-2006

9) Planned
Spending
2006-2007

10) Planned
Spending
2007-2008

11) Program Activity (PA) [8]

 

 

 

 

12) Total Grants

 

 

 

 

12) Total Contributions

 

 

 

 

12) Total Other Transfer Payments

 

 

 

 

12) Total PA

 

 

 

 

13) Total TPP

 

 

 

 

The following information provides additional direction in completing table 14:

  1. Name of Transfer Payment Program : provide the name of the program under which the Terms and Conditions (Ts & Cs) were approved and indicate whether the payments are statutory or voted.
  2. Start Date : indicate the initial date the program started.
  3. End date : indicate the date the program will sunset (the date until payments are expected to be made - not the date the Ts&Cs need to be renewed).
  4. Total Funding : indicate the total amount allocated by the department to the TPP since its inception (start date to end of last fiscal year).
  5. Purpose of Transfer Payment Program : describe the nature of the TPP (reason for its establishment) and provide details on the type of transfer payments involved.
  6. Objective(s) expected result(s) and outcomes : provide the goals, the planned results and the impact/effects of the TPP(should be consistent with the PAA).
  7. Forecast Spending 2004-05 : provide the anticipated amount to be spent in the fiscal year (what you expect to see printed in Public Accounts).
  8. Planned Spending 2005-06 : provide the estimated amount to be spent in the fiscal year.
  9. Planned Spending 2006-07 : provide the estimated amount to be spent in the reporting year.
  10. Planned Spending 2007-08 : provide the estimated amount to be spent in the fiscal year.
  11. Program Activity : provide the title/name of the relevant Program Activity (PA).
  12. Total Grants, Total Contributions, Total Other Transfer Payments and Total PA : complete the appropriate rows by providing the total dollar figure in each column.
  13. Total Transfer Payment Program : provide the total dollar figure for each column.

Table 15: Foundations (Conditional Grants)

Budget 2003, Chapter 7, identified measures to improve the transparency and public accountability of foundations funded through conditional grants and included mandatory requirements for reporting in Report on Plans and Priorities (RPPs) and Departmental Performance Reports (DPRs).

Accordingly, departments responsible for administering funding agreements with foundations must incorporate in their RPP significant expected results to be achieved by the foundations and situate these results within the overall plans and priorities of the department.

" All " departments responsible for administering conditional grant agreements must complete " one " template for " each " foundation, " each " year, for the duration of the funding agreement .

What are Conditional Grants?

Conditional grants are transfer payments generally made to not-for-profit organizations for use over a number of years (or in perpetuity), for a specified purpose, pursuant to conditions contained in a funding agreement. In some cases, these organizations are referred to as foundations.

Because these organizations receive funding to be used over a number of years (or in perpetuity), departments are to report not only when the funding occurs but also throughout the life of the funding agreement.

What to submit

In order to reduce the volume of material in the RPP, departments are to provide a summary listing of Conditional Grants along with the following statement "Further information on these Conditional Grants can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp " in their RPP document.

Departments are then required to fill-in a template for this table.   The template is available on the TBS web site (along with the guidelines) at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp .

Note, the template is not to be inserted into the printed document.   Departments are to post their completed template on their web site at the same time they post their tabled RPP document.

Departments must provide a URL address for the template along with their print-ready material.   This will allow TBS to link to the appropriate information.

The following table is an example of the template.

1) Name of Foundation:

2) Start Date:

3) End Date:

4) Total Funding:

5) Purpose of Funding:

6) Objective(s), expected result(s) and outcomes (within departmental overall plans):

7) Summary of Annual Plans:

 

8) Forecast
Spending
2004-2005

9) Planned
Spending
2005-2006

10) Planned
Spending
2006-2007

11) Planned
Spending
2007-2008

12) Conditional Grant(s)

 

 

 

 

13) URL to Foundation site:

The following information provides additional direction in completing table 15:

  1. Name of Foundation : provide the name of the Foundation.
  2. Start Date : indicate the date the first agreement was signed/started.
  3. End date : indicate the date the last agreement terminates/closes, if available.
  4. Total Funding : indicate the total amount funded to the Foundation since the start date.
  5. Purpose of Funding : describe the nature of the conditional grant administered by the Foundation.
  6. Objective(s) expected result(s) and outcomes : provide the goals, the expected results and the impact/effects of the program and situate these within the overall plans and priorities of the department(should be consistent with PAA).
  7. Summary of Annual Plans : summarize the plans provided by the Foundation in their annual corporate plans.
  8. Forecast Spending 2004-05 : provide the anticipated amount to be spent in the fiscal year by department.
  9. Planned Spending 2005-06 : provide the estimated amount to be spent in the reporting year by department.
  10. Planned Spending 2006-07 : provide the estimated amount to be spent in the fiscal year by department.
  11. Planned Spending 2007-08 : provide the estimated amount to be spent in the fiscal year by department.
  12. Conditional Grant(s) : provide the total dollar figure in each column, if applicable.
  13. URL to Foundation site : provide a link to the Foundation's site to facilitate access to further information on the organization and funding.

 

Table 16: Alternative Service Delivery

This purpose of this table is to display proposed initiatives to deliver programs or services that contribute significantly to the achievement of a department's or agency's mandate using alternative departmental forms and delivery mechanisms.

These reporting requirements apply to federal government departments and agencies listed in Schedules I, I.1, and II of the Financial Administrative Act , except where there is a statutory exemption (e.g., Canada Revenue Agency).

Departments and agencies are to report significant new Alternative Service Delivery (ASD) initiatives or renewal of existing ASD initiatives that are proposed or planned over the next three years.

A significant initiative has annual spending in excess of $20 million or meets any of the following criteria:

  • poses a significant risk to the continuity of service delivery to Canadian citizens;
  • represents a substantial change to the existing mix of industrial and regional benefits;
  • includes sensitive issues in financial or human resource management that require Treasury Board ministerial direction;
  • has an impact on the rights or entitlements of Canadian citizens;
  • contributes significantly to the achievement of the department's mandate;
  • or has an impact on official languages.

Possible departmental forms and delivery mechanisms include special operating agencies, legislated service agencies, departmental corporations, Crown corporations, administrative tribunals, shared governance corporations, partnerships and collaborative arrangements, contracting out, and other options described in the Treasury Board Secretariat's ASD site at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/asd-dmps .

In order to reduce the volume of material in the RPP, departments are to provide a summary listing of programs and services that plan to use ASD initiatives over the next three years. For example:

Over the next three years, Department X will use significant new ASD initiatives or will be renewing existing ASD initiatives for the following programs and/or services.

1. Name of Program or Service
2. Name of Program or Service
3. Name of Program or Service ... etc.

Further information on these ASD initiatives can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp

Departments are then required to fill-in a template for this table.   The template is available on the TBS web site (along with the guidelines) at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp .

Note, the template is not to be inserted into the printed document.   Departments are to post their completed template on their web site at the same time they post their tabled RPP document.

Departments must provide a URL address for the template along with their print-ready material.   This will allow TBS to link to the appropriate information.

The following table is an example of the template.

Name of ASD
Initiative

Current Status

Projected
Implementation
Date

Contact

Name of program or service

New initiative or renewal, type of ASD options being considered, stage of development, key milestones

Start-up date (if exact date is not known enter a fiscal year)

Responsible manager's name, phone number, and e-mail address

Name of program or service

 

 

 

Name of program or service

 

 

 

Add a new row for each proposed ASD initiative.

Table 17: Horizontal Initiatives

The objective of reporting on horizontal initiatives is to provide parliamentarians, the public and government with an overall picture of public expenditures, plans and priorities for all major horizontal initiatives.

A horizontal initiative is an initiative in which partners [9] , from two or more organizations, have established formal funding agreement (e.g. Memorandum to Cabinet, Treasury Board Submission, federal/provincial agreement) to work toward the achievement of shared outcomes. [10] Examples of horizontal initiatives include the Climate Change Initiative, Canada's Drug Strategy, and the Youth Employment Strategy.

A Horizontal Initiative template must be completed for all major horizontal initiatives that:

  • Have been allocated federal funds that exceed $100M for the entire initiative; or
  • Are key to the achievement of government priorities; or
  • Have a high public profile.

The department, whose Minister sponsored the Memorandum to Cabinet or other formal agreements, is responsible for submitting the Horizontal Initiative Template to TBS [11] on behalf of all federal partners.

Federal partners who have received significant funding to deliver public programs are responsible for providing the lead department with planned expenditures and results information and contributing to the completion of the Horizontal Initiative Template.

If a department's involvement in a horizontal initiative is key to the achievement of its strategic outcome(s), the department should reflect this in the main body of the RPP.

In order to reduce the volume of material in the printed RPP, departments are to provide a summary listing of Horizontal Initiatives they are involved in along with the following statement "Further information on these Horizontal Initiatives can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp " in their RPP document.

Departments are then required to fill-in a template for this table.   The template is available on the TBS web site (along with the guidelines) at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp .

Note, the template is not to be inserted into the printed document.   Departments are to post their completed template on their web site at the same time they post their tabled RPP document.

Departments must provide a URL address for the template along with their print-ready material.   This will allow TBS to link to the appropriate information.

 

Horizontal Initiative Template (RPP)

1) Name of Horizontal Initiative:

2) Name of Lead Department(s):

3) Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative:

4) End Date of the Horizontal Initiative:

5) Total Federal Funding Allocation:

6) Description of the Horizontal Initiative:

7) Shared Outcome(s):

8) Governance Structure(s):

9) Federal Partners Involved in each program

10) Names of Programs

11) Total Allocation

12) Planned Spending for 2005-2006

13) Expected Results for 2005-2006

1.

a.

$

$

 

 

b.

$

$

 

 

c.

$

$

 

2.

a.

$

$

 

 

b.

$

$

 

 

c.

$

$

 

3.

a.

$

$

 

 

b.

$

$

 

 

 

Total $

Total $

 

14) Results to be achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable):

15) Contact Information:

16) Approved by:

17) Date Approved:

Information provided in fields 1-11 is likely to remain the same throughout the reporting cycle of a horizontal initiative. Should changes occur, departments are responsible to update this information.

The following information provides additional direction in completing table 17:

  1. Name of Horizontal Initiative : Provide the name of the horizontal initiative under which the Memorandum to Cabinet or other formal agreement was submitted. E.g. Canada's Drug Strategy - Renewed.
  2. Name of Lead Department(s) : Provide the name of lead department(s). E.g. Health Canada.
  3. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative : Indicate the start date of the horizontal initiative. If programs have different start dates, please indicate the date when the first program started.
  4. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative : Indicate the end date of the horizontal initiative funding allocation. If programs have different end dates, please indicate the date when the last program will end. Please indicate on-going if the initiative has been allocated on-going funding.
  5. Total Funding Allocated to the Initiative : Indicate total federal funding allocated (start to end date) to the horizontal initiative.
  6. Description of the Horizontal Initiative : Provide a brief description of the horizontal initiative including a rationale for the initiative, its linkages to government plans and priorities, and objectives. Also, please provide electronic links to further information where applicable.
  7. Shared Outcome(s): Outcomes are targeted results to be achieved by all partners involved in the horizontal initiative. They indicate short, and long-term benefits to Canadians. Good outcomes are measurable, directional in nature, and provide some indication of the extent of change being pursued. E.g. availability of illicit drugs and harmful substances in Canada is reduced; demand for elicit drugs and harmful substances in Canada is reduced.
  8. Governance Structure(s): Indicate the interdepartmental decision-making body and interdepartmental committees and coordinating structures established by the partners involved in the horizontal initiative. E.g. Ministers/Deputy Ministers/Assistant Deputy Ministers Committee (decision-making body); Directors General Committee; Management Board; Secretariat; External Advisory Committee; and other.
  9. Federal Partners Involved in Each Program : Provide the name of each federal department involved in the horizontal initiative including lead departments. Please add rows if the space provided does not permit you to report on all partners .
  10. Names of Programs : Provide the names of key federal programs by partner funded under the horizontal initiative. Please provide electronic links for further information where applicable. Expenditure and results information should be provided by partner and by program. Please add rows if the space provided does not permit you to report on all programs.
  11. Total Allocation : Indicate the total federal funding allocation (start to end date) per partner and program for the duration of the initiative.
  12. Planned Spending for 2005-2006 : Indicate the forecasted spending for fiscal year 2005-2006.
  13. Expected Results for 2005-2006 : Indicate the planned results for fiscal year 2005-2006.
  14. Results to be Achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable): Provide a narrative on the expected achievements of other non-federal partners if applicable. This should include a discussion of each partner's planned expenditures and results in relation to both its partnership arrangement and its strategic outcomes.
  15. Contact Information : Provide the contact information (address, phone number and e-mail) of the horizontal initiative manager who will be able to respond to inquiries on the horizontal initiative.
  16. Approved by : Indicate the name of the person approving the horizontal initiative template.
  17. Date Approved : Indicate the date when the horizontal initiative template was approved.

Instructions on How to Complete DPR Tables

(Instructions for completing the DPR tables are subject to change and will be finalized closer to the DPR exercise)

DPR tables compare planned spending to the actual expenditures for the most recently completed fiscal year.

Departments are to provide a brief explanation of the information presented and how it relates to the results achieved.

The Planned Spending column refers to the figures displayed in your RPP.

The Total Authorities column refers to total spending authorities received from the Treasury Board during the fiscal year.

The Actual Expenditures column refers to what is printed in Public Accounts of Canada.

Financial data can be presented in either thousands or millions of dollars (to one decimal point). Whichever value is chosen must be used consistently throughout the DPR.

If relevant, to the department the following 20 tables must be displayed in the DPR document:

  1. Planned Spending and Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
  2. Program Activities
  3. Voted and Statutory Items listed in Main Estimates
  4. Net Cost of Department
  5. Contingent Liabilities
  6. Loans, Investments and Advances (Non-Budgetary)
  7. Source of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue
  8. Revolving Fund - Statement of Operations; Statement of Cash Flows; and Projected Use of Authority
  9. Resource Requirement by Branch or Sector
  10. User Fees
  11. Response to Parliament, Audits and Evaluations
  12. Financial Statement
  13. Sustainable Development Strategy
  14. Procurement and Contracting
  15. Details on Project Spending *
  16. Status Report on Major Crown Services *
  17. Details on Transfer Payments Programs (Grants, Contributions and Other Transfer Payments) *
  18. Foundations (Conditional Grants) 12
  19. Alternative Service Delivery *
  20. Horizontal Initiatives *

* Special instructions apply to these tables.

If tables 15 to 20 are relevant to the department, the department must provide summary information in the printed DPR document and reference the following TBS web site http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp

Departments are required to fill-in templates that are available on the TBS web site (along with the guidelines) http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp . Once the template is completed departments are to post them on their web site at the same time they post their tabled RPP document.

Departments are also to provide a URL address for the above-mentioned templates and submit it to the appropriate TBS contact along with their RPP print-ready material.

The templates are not to be inserted into the printed document. They will be posted individually on the department's web site and TBS will link to them .

This table summarises and offers a comparison of the Main Estimates, Planned Spending, Total Authorities and Actual Spending. If necessary, explain any negative or positive variances between the categories.

The Main Estimates amount must be identical to that printed in current Main Estimates. The Planned Spending amount must be identical to that printed in the RPP. Any significant variances should be addressed in a paragraph or two, immediately following the table.

Table 1: Comparison of Planned Spending and Full Time Equivalents


2005-2006


($ millions)

Main
Estimates

Planned
Spending

Total
Authorities

Actual
Spending


Enter the program activity title

 

 

 

 

Enter the program activity title

 

 

 

 

Enter the program activity title

 

 

 

 


Total

 

 

 

 


 


Total

 

 

 

 

Less: Non-Respendable revenue

 

 

 

 

Plus: Cost of services received without charge

 

 

 

 


Net cost of Department

 

 

 

 


 

Full Time Equivalents

 

Historical Comparison of Planned Spending and Full Time Equivalents

($ millions)

Actual 2003-04

Actual 2004-05

2005-2006

Main Estimates

Planned Spending

Total Authorities

Actual Spending

Enter the program activity title

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enter the program activity title

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enter the program activity title

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full Time Equivalents

 

 

 

 

Table 2: Program Activit ies

The following table provides resource information for the most recently completed fiscal year. Once completed only the columns with content need to be displayed. The Total Main Estimates and Total Planned Spending amounts must be identical to the amounts displayed in table 1. Any significant variances should be addressed in a paragraph or two, immediately following the table.

2005-2006

Program
Activity

Budgetary

Non-
Budgetary

Total
Main
 Estimates

Adjustments
 (planned
 spending 
not in Main
 Estimates)

Total
Planned
Spending

Operating

Capital

Grants and 
Contributions

Gross

Revenue

Net

Loans,
Investments
 and 
Advances

PA title

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Main Estimates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Planned Spending

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Authorities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actual Spending

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PA title

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Main Estimates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Planned Spending

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Authorities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actual Spending

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Table 3: Voted and Statutory Items listed in Main Estimates

 

 

2005-2006

Vote or
Statutory Item

Truncated Vote 
or Statutory Wording

Main 
Estimates

Planned 
Spending

Total 
Authorities

Actual 
Spending

XX

Operating expenditures

 

 

 

 

XX

Capital expenditures

 

 

 

 

XX

Grants and Contributions

 

 

 

 

(S)

Minister of XXX - Salary and motor car allowance

 

 

 

 

(S)

Contributions to employee benefit plans

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

Any significant variances should be addressed in a paragraph or two, immediately following the table.

Table 4: Net Cost of Department

This table is designed to show the net cost of a department. It begins with the actual spending and adds services received without charge, and then adds or subtracts respendable and non-respendable revenue to arrive at the net cost of the department.

Any significant information the department may want to present should be addressed in a paragraph or two, immediately following the table.

($ millions)


2005-2006

Total Actual Spending

 

Plus: Services Received without Charge

 

Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC)

 

Contributions covering employers' share of employees' insurance premiums and expenditures paid by TBS (excluding revolving funds)

 

Worker's compensation coverage provided by Social Development Canada

 

Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by Justice Canada

 

 

 

Less: Non-respendable Revenue

 

2005-2006 Net cost of Department

 

Note: Total respendable and non-respendable revenue should match to a corresponding line in Table 1.

Table 5: Contingent Liabilities

Liabilities

($ millions)

March 31, 2002

March 31, 2003

March 31, 2004

Loans:

 

 

 

  • Detail

 

 

 

  • Detail

 

 

 

  • Detail

 

 

 

Claims, Pending and 
Threatened Litigation

 

 

 

Litigations:

 

 

 

  • Detail

 

 

 

Non-litigations:

 

 

 

  • Detail

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Any significant information the department may want to present should be addressed in a paragraph or two, immediately following the table.

Table 6: Loans, Investments and Advances (Non-Budgetary)

This table is designed to display the Loans, Investments and Advances (the non-budgetary planned spending) a department is responsible for. Enter the non-budgetary information first by program activity and describe the loan, investment or advancement. Any significant variances should be addressed in a paragraph or two, immediately following the table.

 


2005-2006


($ millions)

Actual
2003-04

Actual
2004-05

Main
Estimates

Planned
Spending

Total
Authorities

Actual
Spending


Enter the program activity title

 

 

 

 

 

 

Describe the loan, investment or advancement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Describe the loan, investment or advancement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repeat the process as often as necessary

 

 

 

 

 

 


Total

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Table 7: Sources of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue

For those departments that generate revenue, the following table identifies the source(s) of respendable and non-respendable revenue at the program activity level. Any significant variances should be addressed in a paragraph or two, immediately following the table.

Non-Respendable Revenue


2005-2006

($ millions)

Actual
2003-04

Actual
2004-05


Main
Estimates

Planned
Revenue

Total
Authorities

Actual
Revenue

Enter the first program activity title.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enter source(s) of respendable revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 2

 

 

 

 

 

 


Enter the second program activity title.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enter source(s) of the respendable revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 


Total Respendable Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 


Non-Respendable Revenue


2005-2006

($ millions)

Actual
2003-04

Actual
2004-05


Main
Estimates

Planned
Revenue

Total
Authorities

Actual
Revenue


Enter the first program activity title.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enter source(s) of respendable revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 2

 

 

 

 

 

 


Enter the second program activity title.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enter source(s) of the respendable revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 


Total Non-Respendable Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Table 8: Revolving Funds

Any significant variances should be addressed in a paragraph or two, immediately following the table.

Statement of Operations

This table refers to the operating surplus or deficit of a Revolving Fund and not to cash.



($ millions)

Actual 2003-04

Actual 2004-05

Main Estimates

Planned Spending


Authorized

Actual Spending


Respendable Revenue

4.7

4.8

4.7

5.1

5.3

5.2


Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating:

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Salaries and employee benefits

1.3

1.3

1.9

1.9

1.9

1.9

   Depreciation

1.0

1.0

1.0

.9

.9

1.0

   Repairs and maintenance

.3

.3

.2

.2

.2

.2

   Administrative and support services

.3

.3

.3

.3

.3

.3

   Utilities, materials and supplies

.4

.4

.4

.4

.4

.4

   Marketing

.3

.3

.3

.3

.3

.2

   Interest

.4

.4

.4

.4

.2

.3

 

 

4.0

4.0

4.5

4.4

4.2

4.3


Surplus (Deficit)

.7

.8

.2

.7

1.1

.9


 Since the table above refers to the Revolving Fund's operating surplus or deficit and not to cash requirements, the Fund has been calculated through accrual accounting. Therefore, the cash expenditures in the estimates do not affect the operating balance, and other items that must be considered when calculating the surplus or deficit do not require a direct cash outlay. The two can be reconciled as follows:

 Statement of Cash Flows


($ millions)

Actual
2003-04

Actual
2004-05

Main
Estimates

Planned
Spending

Authorized

Actual Spending


Surplus (Deficit)*

.7

.8

.2

.7

1.1

.9


Add non-cash items:

           

Depreciation/amortisation

.5

.6

.9

1.0

1.0

.9

Others (defined)

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

Investing activities:

           

Acquisition of depreciable assets

(.2)

(.2)

(3.0)

(1.3)

(.6)

(.7) 


Cash surplus (requirement)

1.0

1.2

(1.9)

.4

1.5

1.1


* Repeat the Surplus (Deficit) line from the table above

Projected Use of Authority


($ millions)

Actual
2003-04

Actual
2004-05

Main
Estimates

Planned
Spending

Authorized

Actual
Spending


Authority

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

             

Drawdown:

           

Balance as at April 1

(3.1)

(3.1)

(2.9)

(4.8)

(4.4)

(2.9)

Projected surplus (Drawdown)*

1.0

1.2

(1.9)

.4

1.5

1.1

 
 

(2.1)

(2.1)

(4.8)

(4.4)

(2.9)

(1.8)


Projected Balance at March 31

5.9

6.1

3.2

3.6

5.1

6.2


The line "Projected surplus (Drawdown)" matches the Cash surplus line from the table above.

 

Table 9: Resource Requirements by Branch/Sector level

This table is designed to explain the distribution of funding to a department at the Branch or Sector level. Any significant variances should be addressed in a paragraph or two, immediately following the table.

2005-2006

Organization

Program Activity

Program Activity

Program Activity

Program Activity

Total

Branch/Sector Name

 

 

 

 

 

Planned Spending

 

 

 

 

 

Total Authorities

 

 

 

 

 

Actual Spending

 

 

 

 

 


Branch/Sector Name

 

 

 

 

 

Planned Spending

 

 

 

 

 

Total Authorities

 

 

 

 

 

Actual Spending

 

 

 

 

 


Branch/Sector Name

 

 

 

 

 

Planned Spending

 

 

 

 

 

Total Authorities

 

 

 

 

 

Actual Spending

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 10: User Fees

On March 31, 2004, Parliament gave legal effect to the User Fees Act with the aim of strengthening the elements of accountability, oversight, and transparency in the management of user fee activities. In light of the Act revisions to the 2003 External Charging Policy are expected. Departments are strongly advised to review the User Fees Act in its entirety and to seek legal counsel when interpreting the Act's applicability or other implementation requirements.

Section 7 of the User Fees Act requires that every Minister (with fees) cause a report to be tabled in Parliament containing specific user fee information. Under the new law, such reports must be tabled annually - on or before December 31 for the fiscal year having ended the previous March 31.

This User Fees template is provided in the following format such that departments may make use of the DPR as an existing parliamentary vehicle to meet the reporting requirements of the User Fees Act .

Departments will note that some of the reporting elements (e.g. forecast revenues and costs) are characteristic of information traditionally contained in RPPs. These elements are, nonetheless, required in this presentation in order to satisfy the requirements of the Act .

Departments are encouraged to be as comprehensive as possible and to respect the objective of transparency even in areas where complete adherence (due to lack of information) may not be possible at this time.


A. 

User Fee



 
Fee Type

 

Fee Setting
Authority

Date Last ModifiedB

2005-06

Planning Years

 Forecast Revenue
($000)

 Actual Revenue
($000)

 Full Cost

($000)

 Performance
Standard

 Performance Results

 Fiscal Year

 

 Forecast Revenue
($000)

 Estimated Full Cost
($000)

Report these figures on an accrual basis or note otherwise Report these figures on an accrual basis or note otherwise

Indicate the name of each user fee as defined by the User Fees Act .

User fees must be identified whether introduced or modified during 2005-06 or not.

Identify the fee type as

Regulatory (R)

Or

Other Products and Services (O)

 

A regulatory fee relates to an activity undertaken by a department that is integral to the effectiveness of a program and successful achievement of the program mandate requires moderating, directing, testing, or approving the actions of external parties.

Identify the authority used to set or amend the fee

e.g. Financial Administration Act

Oceans Act

Indicate the date on which the fee was introduced or most recently amended

 

See section B. below for fees amended in fiscal year 2005-06.

Indicate the projected revenue for
2005-06 in $000

Indicate actual revenue in $000

Indicate the full (estimated) cost

Identify costs incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity

 

Express as a specific statement of quantity or quality of service provided

Performance standards must be measurable

 

e.g. processing time of 60 days per transaction

or

80% satisfaction rate as measured through survey of every service recipient.

 

Express as a specific measurement of results achieved against pre-established performance standard

 

e.g. 60-day processing standard met 87% of the time

or

94% of clients indicated 'good' or 'very good' satisfaction with service provided.

2005-06

2006-07

 

2007-08

Provide forecasted revenues for each planning year

Provide the estimated full cost for each planning year

Identify costs incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity

 

 

 

 

Sub-Total   (R)

Sub-total (O)

Total

Sub-Total   (R)

Sub-total (O)

Total

Sub-Total   (R)

Sub-total (O)

Total

 

 

Sub-total:

Sub-total:

Sub-total:

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Total

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Total

B. Date Last Modified:
Where the introduction or most recent amendment to a user fee occurred in 2005-06 , briefly describe the rationale, consultation, and circumstances surrounding the fee change, including summary information on complaints raised during consultation, the establishment of an independent advisory panel and how that body dealt with complaints.

C. Other Information:

Departments may use this area to describe any significant factors or events that have impacted user fee activities. For example, how performance results may have been impacted by external factors, or what measures are being taken to address performance gaps.

Departments are encouraged to supplement the template with hyperlinks to their respective web sites that contain additional detail.


 
Previous Table of Contents Next