Please note that the DPR portion of the 2005-2006 Guide is currently being updated. An information update and new DPR templates will be posted shortly on this website to explain updated reporting requirements for 2005-2006.
The User Fees Act took effect March 31, 2004 with the aim of
increasing accountability and parliamentary engagement in the oversight and
implementation of user fees. In light of the new legislation, the 2003
External Charging Policy will be rationalized to ensure full compatibility.
The two frameworks, however, are already fully in accord with respect to the
principle of enhancing accountability and maintaining the highest degree of
transparency possible to Parliament and the public.
To this end, departments and agencies with planned user fee initiatives must
complete the template entitled " Planned User Fee Activities for New or
Amended Fees ". User fee activities will be determined by the definition
provided in the User Fees Act .
The department is required to report its planned user fee activities and
include information relating to type and fee setting authority of the planned
fee, the reason for the planned fee introduction or amendment, the planned
effective date and the planned consultation and review processes.
The department is also encouraged to provide hyperlinks, where applicable,
and available, to their respective websites for more detailed information.
Name of User Fee
|
Fee Type
|
Fee Setting
Authority
|
Reason for Fee
Introduction or Amendment
|
Effective date of
planned change to take effect
|
Consultation & Review process Planned
|
For any planned user fee initiative (as defined by the User Fee Act ):
Express the name of the user fee to be introduced or amended and
Specify if "New" or "Amending"
|
Identify the type of fee
e.g.
Regulatory service (R)
or
Other Goods and Services (O) -
A regulatory fee relates to an activity undertaken by a
department that is integral to the effectiveness of a program and
successful achievement of the program mandate requires moderating,
directing, testing, or approving the actions of external parties.
|
Express the fee setting authority that will be used
e.g.
. Financial Administration Act
. Oceans Act
. Passport Fees Regulations
|
Briefly describe the rationale for the new fee or the reason for the
fee amendment
e.g.
. cost increase or decrease
. inflation
. volume change
. part of fundamental service review
. part of ongoing review cycle
|
Identify the year that the new or amended fee is to take effect
e.g.
. 2005-2006
and/or
. 2006-2007
and/or
. 2007-2008
|
Briefly, describe the key planned consultation activities and review
process in respect of the associated requirements contained in the User
Fees Act .
|
Departments are encouraged to supplement the template with hyperlinks to
their respective web sites that contain additional detail.
Regulatory Initiatives result in the making of regulations by the
Governor-in-Council, a Minister or an Administrative Agency.
This table should consist of a listing of initiatives that the department
expects to submit for legal examination or final approval. It should also
contain information on proposed major or significant initiatives
that are scheduled for implementation during the planning period.
The department is to decide what constitutes a major or significant
Regulatory Initiative. However, the following two bullets can be used as a
general guideline.
- A major regulation
has expenditures in excess of $50M or expenditures greater than $100K with a low
degree of public acceptance.
- A significant regulation
is one that has an annual impact on the economy of $10M or more. It may
adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, provincial, local or Aboriginal
governments; or creates a serious inconsistency or otherwise interferes with an
action taken or planned by another federal government department or agency. It
may materially alter the authorized levels of departments; or the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or raise novel legal or policy issues arising
out of legal mandates; or the Government's priorities.
Note: When major or significant Regulatory Initiatives overlap several
departments, it shall be the responsibility of the lead department to
ensure the appropriate horizontal co-ordination is carried out with the other
departments.
This information replaces the material provided in the "Federal Regulatory
Plan". The following example links Regulations and Planned Results. The
department may wish to direct the reader to view detailed information using
alternative vehicles such as departmental web sites.
Regulatory Initiatives
Regulations
|
Expected Results
|
List the regulatory initiatives that the department expects to submit
for final approval and the proposed initiatives that are scheduled for
implementation during the planning period.
|
Based on the corresponding Regulatory Initiative (first column) enter what
the department expects to achieve and how it plans to achieve
them.
|
The purpose of this table is to identify departmental projects, capital,
lease, information technology and Major Crown projects underway during the
reporting period, which exceed their delegated project approval level.
For further information on the project level, refer to the Project Approval
Policy, Annex E located within the framework established in the government's
project management policy suite and to explain the allocation of resources.
Projects are defined as a set of activities required to produce certain
defined outputs, or to accomplish specific goals or objectives, within a defined
schedule and resource budget. A project exists only for the duration of time
required to complete its stated objectives . The Government's project
management policy suite applies to any project for which the federal
government will be:
- the owner of the
end-product; or,
- the prime user of
the end-product; or
- the entity
responsible for delivering the product, including managing a contract or
contracts for that purpose.
Information on project phases and project approval authorities are found at http://publiservice.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pm-gp/category-categorie.asp?Language=EN&site=PMD&id=081
.
This table is not intended to report project-like activities or initiatives
funded through the Transfer Payment Policy.
In order to reduce the volume of material in the printed RPP document,
departments are to provide a summary listing of projects that have exceeded
their delegated project approval level along with the following statement
"Further information on these projects can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
".
Departments are then required to fill-in a template for this table.
The template is available on the TBS web site (along with the guidelines)
at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.
Note, the template is not to be inserted into the printed document.
Departments are to post their completed template on their web site at the
same time they post their tabled RPP document.
Departments must provide a URL address for the template along with
their print-ready material. This will allow TBS to link to the
appropriate information.
The following example of the template lists each individual project by
Program Activity. Departments should identify the project by applicable phase.
Typically, project phases include: Initial Planning and Identification; Project
Definition; Project Implementation; and Project Close-out. Note Treasury Board
approvals are coincident with the Project Definition and Project Implementation
phases.
|
($ millions)
|
Current Estimated Total Cost
|
Forecast Spending to March 31, 2005
|
Planned Spending
2005-2006
|
Planned Spending
2006-2007
|
Planned Spending
2007-2008
|
Future Year Spending Requirement
|
|
Enter the department's Program activity title
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter the project name and project phase
|
12.5
|
0.5
|
2.5
|
2.5
|
2.5
|
4.5
|
Enter the department's second Program activity title (if
applicable)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter the project name and project phase
|
20.0
|
16.4
|
1.5
|
1.6
|
0.5
|
. . .
|
|
Repeat the above process
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Crown Projects (MCP) have cost estimates that exceed $100 million and
are considered high risk. The Treasury Board may also direct that certain
projects, with a total cost of less than $100 million but considered to be
high risk, be designated as a MCP.
In order to reduce the volume of material in the RPP, departments are
to provide a summary listing of (designated) MCP(s) along with the following
statement "Further information on these Major Crown Projects can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
".
Departments are then required to fill-in a template for this table.
The template is available on the TBS web site (along with the guidelines)
at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.
Note, the template is not to be inserted into the printed document.
Departments are to post their completed template on their web site at the
same time they post their tabled RPP document.
Departments must provide a URL address for the template along with
their print-ready material. This will allow TBS to link to the
appropriate information.
This table is not intended to report project-like activities or initiatives
funded through the Transfer Payment Policy.
Only lead departments should prepare a status report. A current list of
designated Major Crown Projects is located at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rma/dpr/02-03/guidance/guide_e.asp#mcp
Projects exceeding $100 million, but that have not been assessed as high risk
or designated as a MCP, should not be included in this table.
The template information found on the web site should, at a minimum, consist
of the following:
- Description
- Project Phase (Initial Planning and
Identification; Project Definition; Project Implementation; or Project
Close-out)
- Leading and Participating Departments and
Agencies
- Prime and Major Sub-Contractor
- Major Milestones
- Progress Report and Explanations of
Variances
- Industrial Benefits
- Summary of non-recurring expenditures
Details on each of these requirements are outlined below:
1. Description
This sub-section is used to describe and/or explain what the Major Crown
project is and why it is being done.
2. Project Phase
This sub-section identifies the phase the project is currently at: Initial
Planning and Identification or Project Definition or Project Implementation or
Project Close-out.
3. Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies
This sub-section lists the participants (departments) associated with the
Major Crown project.
Lead Department or Agency:
|
Enter the Leading Department's or Agency's name
|
Contracting Authority:
|
Enter the Department's or Agency's name
|
Participating Departments and Agencies:
|
Enter the Department's or Agency's name(s)
|
4. Prime and Major Sub-Contractors
This sub-section lists all contractors associated with the development of the
Major Crown project.
Prime Contractor:
|
Enter the name of the company and the address using the city, province
and country (where applicable).
|
Major Sub-Contractors:
|
Enter the name of the company and the address using the city, province
and country (where applicable).
|
5. Major Milestones
This sub-section lists the major milestones associated with the progress of
the Major Crown project.
Major Milestones
|
Date
|
List milestones relating to the progress of the project.
|
List the date the milestone is expected to occur.
|
6. Progress Report and Explanations of Variances
This sub-section is to provide the reader with a progress report on how the
Major Crown projects are doing. It should also bring attention to any variances
in cost since the beginning of the project.
For example:
- In the beginning,
Treasury Board approved the project name with an estimated cost of $XX million.
- On mm/dd/yyyy,
Treasury Board granted additional monies to the project name due to ... the
total cost is now estimated at $XX million.
- On mm/dd/yyyy enter the department's name used internal resources for
$XX million to cover cost overruns for project name.
- The project name is
currently running . . . on, over or under budget (provide explanations).
- The project name is
to be completed by ...
7. Industrial Benefits
This sub-section is designed to inform the reader of the benefits to the
Canadian industry as a whole, as well as listing the regions that will benefit
from the project. A short list of the regions and the monies to be spent there
should be displayed. For example:
Canadian industry in the following regions of Canada will benefit from the
project name project:
Region
|
Cash Benefits
|
Atlantic Canada
|
$40 million
|
Quebec
|
$295 million
|
Ontario
|
$135 million
|
Western Canada
|
$80 million
|
8. Summary of Non-recurring Expenditures
This table was designed to inform the reader of one-time or non-recurring
expenditures associated with each Major Crown project. The amounts displayed are
cumulative.
($ millions)
|
Current Estimated Total Expenditure
|
Forecast Expenditures to
March 31, 2004
|
Planned Spending
2005-2006
|
Future Years' Requirements
|
Enter the project name and the specific operation incurring the
one-time expenditure
|
4.9
|
4.9
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
Enter the project name and the specific operation incurring the
one-time expenditure
|
191.7
|
67.5
|
1.5
|
122.7
|
The Policy
on Transfer Payments states: " For each transfer payment program with
transfers in excess of five million dollars, the Departmental Report on Plans
and Priorities must include supplementary descriptive material, such as stated
objectives, expected results and outcomes, and milestones for achievement ."
" All " departments responsible for administering TPPs must
complete " one" template for "each" TPP, including
statutory transfer payment programs, where total TPs exceeds five million
dollars during the reporting year.
NOTE: Conditional Grants to Foundations are to be reported separately
from TPP (see table 16 for instructions on Conditional Grants).
What are Transfer Payments (TP)?
Transfer payments are payments made based on appropriations for which no
goods or services are directly received. The three main types of transfer
payments are grants, contributions, and other transfer payments (OTP).
A Transfer Payment Program is defined as a collection of transfer
payments (either voted or statutory) aimed at a common objective or set of
objectives. Their purpose is "to further" departmental objectives and
strategic outcomes and, as such, relate to departmental program activities (that
reside in the PAA). TPPs leverage the strengths of communities and organizations
to achieve specific government policy outcomes.
What to Submit
In order to reduce the volume of material in the RPP, departments are
to provide a listing of TPPs that exceeded $5 million in the Estimates year
along with the following statement "Further information on these Transfer
Payment Programs can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
" in their RPP document.
Departments are then required to fill-in a template for this table.
The template is available on the TBS web site (along with the guidelines)
at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.
Note, the template is not to be inserted into the printed document.
Departments are to post their completed template on their web site at the
same time they post their tabled RPP document.
Departments must provide a URL address for the template along with
their print-ready material. This will allow TBS to link to the
appropriate information.
The following table is an example of the template.
1) Name of Transfer Payment Program:
|
2) Start Date:
|
3) End Date:
|
4) Total Funding:
|
5) Purpose of Transfer Payment Program:
|
6) Objective(s), expected result(s) and outcomes:
|
|
7) Forecast
Spending
2004-2005
|
8) Planned
Spending
2005-2006
|
9) Planned
Spending
2006-2007
|
10) Planned
Spending
2007-2008
|
11) Program Activity (PA) [8]
|
|
|
|
|
12) Total Grants
|
|
|
|
|
12) Total Contributions
|
|
|
|
|
12) Total Other Transfer Payments
|
|
|
|
|
12) Total PA
|
|
|
|
|
13) Total TPP
|
|
|
|
|
The following information provides additional direction in completing table
14:
- Name of Transfer Payment Program :
provide the name of the program under which the Terms and Conditions (Ts &
Cs) were approved and indicate whether the payments are statutory or voted.
- Start Date : indicate the initial
date the program started.
- End date : indicate the date the
program will sunset (the date until payments are expected to be made - not the
date the Ts&Cs need to be renewed).
- Total Funding : indicate the total
amount allocated by the department to the TPP since its inception (start date to
end of last fiscal year).
- Purpose of Transfer Payment Program :
describe the nature of the TPP (reason for its establishment) and provide
details on the type of transfer payments involved.
- Objective(s) expected result(s) and
outcomes : provide the goals, the planned results and the impact/effects of
the TPP(should be consistent with the PAA).
- Forecast Spending 2004-05 : provide
the anticipated amount to be spent in the fiscal year (what you expect to see
printed in Public Accounts).
- Planned Spending 2005-06 : provide
the estimated amount to be spent in the fiscal year.
- Planned Spending 2006-07 : provide
the estimated amount to be spent in the reporting year.
- Planned Spending 2007-08 : provide the estimated amount to
be spent in the fiscal year.
- Program Activity : provide the title/name of the relevant
Program Activity (PA).
- Total Grants, Total Contributions, Total Other Transfer
Payments and Total PA : complete the appropriate rows by providing the total
dollar figure in each column.
- Total Transfer Payment Program : provide the total dollar
figure for each column.
Budget 2003, Chapter
7, identified measures to improve the transparency and public accountability
of foundations funded through conditional grants and included mandatory
requirements for reporting in Report on Plans and Priorities (RPPs) and
Departmental Performance Reports (DPRs).
Accordingly, departments responsible for administering funding agreements
with foundations must incorporate in their RPP significant expected results to
be achieved by the foundations and situate these results within the overall
plans and priorities of the department.
" All " departments responsible for administering conditional
grant agreements must complete " one " template for " each "
foundation, " each " year, for the duration of the funding
agreement .
What are Conditional Grants?
Conditional grants are transfer payments generally made to not-for-profit
organizations for use over a number of years (or in perpetuity), for a specified
purpose, pursuant to conditions contained in a funding agreement. In some cases,
these organizations are referred to as foundations.
Because these organizations receive funding to be used over a number of years
(or in perpetuity), departments are to report not only when the funding occurs
but also throughout the life of the funding agreement.
What to submit
In order to reduce the volume of material in the RPP, departments are
to provide a summary listing of Conditional Grants along with the following
statement "Further information on these Conditional Grants can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
" in their RPP document.
Departments are then required to fill-in a template for this table.
The template is available on the TBS web site (along with the guidelines)
at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.
Note, the template is not to be inserted into the printed document.
Departments are to post their completed template on their web site at the
same time they post their tabled RPP document.
Departments must provide a URL address for the template along with
their print-ready material. This will allow TBS to link to the
appropriate information.
The following table is an example of the template.
1) Name of Foundation:
|
2) Start Date:
|
3) End Date:
|
4) Total Funding:
|
5) Purpose of Funding:
|
6) Objective(s), expected result(s) and outcomes (within departmental
overall plans):
|
7) Summary of Annual Plans:
|
|
8) Forecast
Spending
2004-2005
|
9) Planned
Spending
2005-2006
|
10) Planned
Spending
2006-2007
|
11) Planned
Spending
2007-2008
|
12) Conditional Grant(s)
|
|
|
|
|
13) URL to Foundation site:
|
The following information provides additional direction in completing table
15:
- Name of Foundation : provide the
name of the Foundation.
- Start Date : indicate the date the
first agreement was signed/started.
- End date : indicate the date the
last agreement terminates/closes, if available.
- Total Funding : indicate the total
amount funded to the Foundation since the start date.
- Purpose of Funding : describe the
nature of the conditional grant administered by the Foundation.
- Objective(s) expected result(s) and
outcomes : provide the goals, the expected results and the impact/effects of
the program and situate these within the overall plans and priorities of the
department(should be consistent with PAA).
- Summary of Annual Plans : summarize
the plans provided by the Foundation in their annual corporate plans.
- Forecast Spending 2004-05 : provide
the anticipated amount to be spent in the fiscal year by department.
- Planned Spending 2005-06 : provide
the estimated amount to be spent in the reporting year by department.
- Planned Spending 2006-07 : provide the estimated amount to
be spent in the fiscal year by department.
- Planned Spending 2007-08 : provide the estimated amount to
be spent in the fiscal year by department.
- Conditional Grant(s) : provide the total dollar figure in
each column, if applicable.
- URL to Foundation site : provide a link to the
Foundation's site to facilitate access to further information on the
organization and funding.
This purpose of this table is to display proposed initiatives to deliver
programs or services that contribute significantly to the achievement of a
department's or agency's mandate using alternative departmental forms and
delivery mechanisms.
These reporting requirements apply to federal government departments and
agencies listed in Schedules I, I.1, and II of the Financial
Administrative Act , except where there is a statutory exemption (e.g.,
Canada Revenue Agency).
Departments and agencies are to report significant new Alternative Service
Delivery (ASD) initiatives or renewal of existing ASD initiatives that are
proposed or planned over the next three years.
A significant initiative has annual spending in excess of $20 million or
meets any of the following criteria:
- poses a significant
risk to the continuity of service delivery to Canadian citizens;
- represents a
substantial change to the existing mix of industrial and regional benefits;
- includes sensitive
issues in financial or human resource management that require Treasury Board
ministerial direction;
- has an impact on the
rights or entitlements of Canadian citizens;
- contributes
significantly to the achievement of the department's mandate;
- or has an impact on
official languages.
Possible departmental forms and delivery mechanisms include special operating
agencies, legislated service agencies, departmental corporations, Crown
corporations, administrative tribunals, shared governance corporations,
partnerships and collaborative arrangements, contracting out, and other options
described in the Treasury Board Secretariat's ASD site at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/asd-dmps
.
In order to reduce the volume of material in the RPP, departments are
to provide a summary listing of programs and services that plan to use ASD
initiatives over the next three years. For example:
Over the next three years, Department X will use significant new ASD
initiatives or will be renewing existing ASD initiatives for the following
programs and/or services.
1. Name of Program or Service
2. Name of Program or Service
3. Name of Program or Service ... etc.
Further information on these ASD initiatives can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
|
Departments are then required to fill-in a template for this table.
The template is available on the TBS web site (along with the guidelines)
at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.
Note, the template is not to be inserted into the printed document.
Departments are to post their completed template on their web site at the
same time they post their tabled RPP document.
Departments must provide a URL address for the template along with
their print-ready material. This will allow TBS to link to the
appropriate information.
The following table is an example of the template.
Name of ASD
Initiative
|
Current Status
|
Projected
Implementation
Date
|
Contact
|
Name of program or service
|
New initiative or renewal, type of ASD options being considered, stage
of development, key milestones
|
Start-up date (if exact date is not known enter a fiscal year)
|
Responsible manager's name, phone number, and e-mail address
|
Name of program or service
|
|
|
|
Name of program or service
|
|
|
|
Add a new row for each proposed ASD initiative.
The objective of reporting on horizontal initiatives is to provide
parliamentarians, the public and government with an overall picture of public
expenditures, plans and priorities for all major horizontal initiatives.
A horizontal initiative is an initiative in which
partners [9] , from two or more
organizations, have established formal funding agreement (e.g. Memorandum to
Cabinet, Treasury Board Submission, federal/provincial agreement) to work toward
the achievement of shared outcomes. [10]
Examples of horizontal initiatives include the Climate Change Initiative,
Canada's Drug Strategy, and the Youth Employment Strategy.
A Horizontal Initiative template must be completed for all major horizontal
initiatives that:
- Have been allocated
federal funds that exceed $100M for the entire initiative; or
- Are key to the
achievement of government priorities; or
- Have a high public
profile.
The department, whose Minister sponsored the Memorandum
to Cabinet or other formal agreements, is responsible for submitting the
Horizontal Initiative Template to TBS [11]
on behalf of all federal partners.
Federal partners who have received significant funding to deliver public
programs are responsible for providing the lead department with planned
expenditures and results information and contributing to the completion of the
Horizontal Initiative Template.
If a department's involvement in a horizontal initiative is key to the
achievement of its strategic outcome(s), the department should reflect this in
the main body of the RPP.
In order to reduce the volume of material in the printed RPP,
departments are to provide a summary listing of Horizontal Initiatives they are
involved in along with the following statement "Further information on these
Horizontal Initiatives can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
" in their RPP document.
Departments are then required to fill-in a template for this table.
The template is available on the TBS web site (along with the guidelines)
at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
.
Note, the template is not to be inserted into the printed document.
Departments are to post their completed template on their web site at the
same time they post their tabled RPP document.
Departments must provide a URL address for the template along with
their print-ready material. This will allow TBS to link to the
appropriate information.
Horizontal Initiative Template (RPP)
|
1) Name of Horizontal Initiative:
|
2) Name of Lead Department(s):
|
3) Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative:
|
4) End Date of the Horizontal Initiative:
|
5) Total Federal Funding Allocation:
|
6) Description of the Horizontal Initiative:
|
7) Shared Outcome(s):
|
8) Governance Structure(s):
|
9) Federal Partners Involved in each program
|
10) Names of Programs
|
11) Total Allocation
|
12) Planned Spending for 2005-2006
|
13) Expected Results for 2005-2006
|
1.
|
a.
|
$
|
$
|
|
|
b.
|
$
|
$
|
|
|
c.
|
$
|
$
|
|
2.
|
a.
|
$
|
$
|
|
|
b.
|
$
|
$
|
|
|
c.
|
$
|
$
|
|
3.
|
a.
|
$
|
$
|
|
|
b.
|
$
|
$
|
|
|
|
Total $
|
Total $
|
|
14) Results to be achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable):
|
15) Contact Information:
|
16) Approved by:
|
17) Date Approved:
|
Information provided in fields 1-11 is likely to remain the same throughout
the reporting cycle of a horizontal initiative. Should changes occur,
departments are responsible to update this information.
The following information provides additional direction in completing table
17:
- Name of Horizontal Initiative :
Provide the name of the horizontal initiative under which the Memorandum to
Cabinet or other formal agreement was submitted. E.g. Canada's Drug Strategy -
Renewed.
- Name of Lead Department(s) : Provide
the name of lead department(s). E.g. Health Canada.
- Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative :
Indicate the start date of the horizontal initiative. If programs have different
start dates, please indicate the date when the first program started.
- End Date of the Horizontal Initiative :
Indicate the end date of the horizontal initiative funding allocation. If
programs have different end dates, please indicate the date when the last
program will end. Please indicate on-going if the initiative has been allocated
on-going funding.
- Total Funding Allocated to the
Initiative : Indicate total federal funding allocated (start to end date) to
the horizontal initiative.
- Description of the Horizontal Initiative
: Provide a brief description of the horizontal initiative including a
rationale for the initiative, its linkages to government plans and priorities,
and objectives. Also, please provide electronic links to further information
where applicable.
- Shared Outcome(s): Outcomes are
targeted results to be achieved by all partners involved in the horizontal
initiative. They indicate short, and long-term benefits to Canadians. Good
outcomes are measurable, directional in nature, and provide some indication of
the extent of change being pursued. E.g. availability of illicit drugs and
harmful substances in Canada is reduced; demand for elicit drugs and harmful
substances in Canada is reduced.
- Governance Structure(s): Indicate
the interdepartmental decision-making body and interdepartmental committees and
coordinating structures established by the partners involved in the horizontal
initiative. E.g. Ministers/Deputy Ministers/Assistant Deputy Ministers Committee
(decision-making body); Directors General Committee; Management Board;
Secretariat; External Advisory Committee; and other.
- Federal Partners Involved in Each
Program : Provide the name of each federal department involved in the
horizontal initiative including lead departments. Please add rows if the
space provided does not permit you to report on all partners .
- Names of Programs : Provide the names of key federal
programs by partner funded under the horizontal initiative. Please provide
electronic links for further information where applicable. Expenditure and
results information should be provided by partner and by program. Please add
rows if the space provided does not permit you to report on all programs.
- Total Allocation : Indicate the total federal funding
allocation (start to end date) per partner and program for the duration of the
initiative.
- Planned Spending for 2005-2006 : Indicate the forecasted
spending for fiscal year 2005-2006.
- Expected Results for 2005-2006 : Indicate the planned
results for fiscal year 2005-2006.
- Results to be Achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable):
Provide a narrative on the expected achievements of other non-federal partners
if applicable. This should include a discussion of each partner's planned
expenditures and results in relation to both its partnership arrangement and its
strategic outcomes.
- Contact Information : Provide the contact information
(address, phone number and e-mail) of the horizontal initiative manager who will
be able to respond to inquiries on the horizontal initiative.
- Approved by : Indicate the name of the person approving the
horizontal initiative template.
- Date Approved : Indicate the date when the horizontal
initiative template was approved.
(Instructions for completing the DPR tables are subject to change and
will be finalized closer to the DPR exercise)
DPR tables compare planned spending to the actual expenditures for the most
recently completed fiscal year.
Departments are to provide a brief explanation of the information presented
and how it relates to the results achieved.
The Planned Spending column refers to the figures displayed in your
RPP.
The Total Authorities column refers to total spending authorities
received from the Treasury Board during the fiscal year.
The Actual Expenditures column refers to what is printed in Public
Accounts of Canada.
Financial data can be presented in either thousands or millions of
dollars (to one decimal point). Whichever value is chosen must be used
consistently throughout the DPR.
If relevant, to the department the following 20 tables must be displayed in
the DPR document:
- Planned Spending and Full Time Equivalent
(FTE)
- Program Activities
- Voted and Statutory Items listed in Main
Estimates
- Net Cost of Department
- Contingent Liabilities
- Loans, Investments and Advances
(Non-Budgetary)
- Source of Respendable and Non-Respendable
Revenue
- Revolving Fund - Statement of Operations;
Statement of Cash Flows; and Projected Use of Authority
- Resource Requirement by Branch or Sector
- User Fees
- Response to Parliament, Audits and Evaluations
- Financial Statement
- Sustainable Development Strategy
- Procurement and Contracting
- Details on Project Spending *
- Status Report on Major Crown Services *
- Details on Transfer Payments Programs (Grants, Contributions and
Other Transfer Payments) *
- Foundations (Conditional Grants) 12
- Alternative Service Delivery *
- Horizontal Initiatives *
* Special instructions apply to these tables.
If tables 15 to 20 are relevant to the department, the department must provide
summary information in the printed DPR document and reference the following
TBS web site http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
Departments are required to fill-in templates that are available on the
TBS web site (along with the guidelines) http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
. Once the template is completed departments are to post them on their web
site at the same time they post their tabled RPP document.
Departments are also to provide a URL address for the above-mentioned
templates and submit it to the appropriate TBS contact along with their RPP
print-ready material.
The templates are not to be inserted into the printed document. They will be posted
individually on the department's web site and TBS will link to them .
This table summarises and offers a comparison of the Main Estimates, Planned
Spending, Total Authorities and Actual Spending. If necessary, explain any
negative or positive variances between the categories.
The Main Estimates amount must be identical to that printed in current Main
Estimates. The Planned Spending amount must be identical to that printed in the
RPP. Any significant variances should be addressed in a paragraph or two,
immediately following the table.
|
2005-2006
|
|
($ millions)
|
Main
Estimates
|
Planned
Spending
|
Total
Authorities
|
Actual
Spending
|
|
Enter the program activity title
|
|
|
|
|
Enter the program activity title
|
|
|
|
|
Enter the program activity title
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Non-Respendable revenue
|
|
|
|
|
Plus: Cost of services received without charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cost of Department
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical Comparison of Planned Spending and Full Time Equivalents
($ millions)
|
Actual 2003-04
|
Actual 2004-05
|
2005-2006
|
Main Estimates
|
Planned Spending
|
Total Authorities
|
Actual Spending
|
Enter the program activity title
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter the program activity title
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter the program activity title
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides resource information for the most recently
completed fiscal year. Once completed only the columns with content need to be
displayed. The Total Main Estimates and Total Planned Spending amounts must be
identical to the amounts displayed in table 1. Any significant variances should
be addressed in a paragraph or two, immediately following the table.
2005-2006
|
Program
Activity
|
Budgetary
|
Non-
Budgetary
|
Total
Main
Estimates
|
Adjustments
(planned
spending
not in Main
Estimates)
|
Total
Planned
Spending
|
Operating
|
Capital
|
Grants and
Contributions
|
Gross
|
Revenue
|
Net
|
Loans,
Investments
and
Advances
|
PA title
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planned Spending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Authorities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Spending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PA title
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planned Spending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Authorities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Spending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-2006
|
Vote or
Statutory Item
|
Truncated Vote
or Statutory Wording
|
Main
Estimates
|
Planned
Spending
|
Total
Authorities
|
Actual
Spending
|
XX
|
Operating expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
XX
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
XX
|
Grants and Contributions
|
|
|
|
|
(S)
|
Minister of XXX - Salary and motor car allowance
|
|
|
|
|
(S)
|
Contributions to employee benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Any significant variances should be addressed in a paragraph or two,
immediately following the table.
This table is designed to show the net cost of a department. It begins with
the actual spending and adds services received without charge, and then adds or
subtracts respendable and non-respendable revenue to arrive at the net cost of
the department.
Any significant information the department may want to present should be
addressed in a paragraph or two, immediately following the table.
($ millions)
|
2005-2006
|
Total Actual Spending
|
|
Plus: Services Received without Charge
|
|
Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada
(PWGSC)
|
|
Contributions covering employers' share of employees' insurance
premiums and expenditures paid by TBS (excluding revolving funds)
|
|
Worker's compensation coverage provided by Social Development Canada
|
|
Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by
Justice Canada
|
|
|
|
Less: Non-respendable Revenue
|
|
2005-2006 Net cost of Department
|
|
Note: Total respendable and non-respendable revenue should match to a
corresponding line in Table 1.
Liabilities
|
($ millions)
|
March 31, 2002
|
March 31, 2003
|
March 31, 2004
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims, Pending and
Threatened Litigation
|
|
|
|
Litigations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-litigations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Any significant information the department may want to present should be
addressed in a paragraph or two, immediately following the table.
This table is designed to display the Loans, Investments and Advances (the
non-budgetary planned spending) a department is responsible for. Enter the
non-budgetary information first by program activity and describe the loan,
investment or advancement. Any significant variances should be addressed in a
paragraph or two, immediately following the table.
|
|
|
|
2005-2006
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
Actual
2003-04
|
Actual
2004-05
|
Main
Estimates
|
Planned
Spending
|
Total
Authorities
|
Actual
Spending
|
|
|
Enter the program activity title
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Describe the loan, investment or advancement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Describe the loan, investment or advancement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repeat the process as often as necessary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For those departments that generate revenue, the following table identifies
the source(s) of respendable and non-respendable revenue at the program activity
level. Any significant variances should be addressed in a paragraph or two,
immediately following the table.
Non-Respendable Revenue
|
|
|
|
2005-2006
|
($ millions)
|
Actual
2003-04
|
Actual
2004-05
|
|
Main
Estimates
|
Planned
Revenue
|
Total
Authorities
|
Actual
Revenue
|
Enter the first program activity title.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter source(s) of respendable revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter the second program activity title.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter source(s) of the respendable revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Respendable Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Respendable Revenue
|
|
|
|
2005-2006
|
($ millions)
|
Actual
2003-04
|
Actual
2004-05
|
|
Main
Estimates
|
Planned
Revenue
|
Total
Authorities
|
Actual
Revenue
|
|
Enter the first program activity title.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter source(s) of respendable revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter the second program activity title.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enter source(s) of the respendable revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Respendable Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any significant variances should be addressed in a paragraph or two,
immediately following the table.
Statement of Operations
This table refers to the operating surplus or deficit of a Revolving Fund and
not to cash.
|
($ millions)
|
Actual 2003-04
|
Actual 2004-05
|
Main Estimates
|
Planned Spending
|
Authorized
|
Actual Spending
|
|
Respendable Revenue
|
4.7
|
4.8
|
4.7
|
5.1
|
5.3
|
5.2
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
1.3
|
1.3
|
1.9
|
1.9
|
1.9
|
1.9
|
Depreciation
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
.9
|
.9
|
1.0
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
.3
|
.3
|
.2
|
.2
|
.2
|
.2
|
Administrative and support services
|
.3
|
.3
|
.3
|
.3
|
.3
|
.3
|
Utilities, materials and supplies
|
.4
|
.4
|
.4
|
.4
|
.4
|
.4
|
Marketing
|
.3
|
.3
|
.3
|
.3
|
.3
|
.2
|
Interest
|
.4
|
.4
|
.4
|
.4
|
.2
|
.3
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
4.0
|
4.5
|
4.4
|
4.2
|
4.3
|
|
Surplus (Deficit)
|
.7
|
.8
|
.2
|
.7
|
1.1
|
.9
|
|
Since the table above refers to the Revolving Fund's operating surplus or
deficit and not to cash requirements, the Fund has been calculated through
accrual accounting. Therefore, the cash expenditures in the estimates do not affect the operating balance,
and other items that must be considered when calculating the surplus or deficit do not require a direct cash outlay. The two can be reconciled as
follows:
Statement of Cash Flows
|
($ millions)
|
Actual
2003-04
|
Actual
2004-05
|
Main
Estimates
|
Planned
Spending
|
Authorized
|
Actual Spending
|
|
Surplus (Deficit)*
|
.7
|
.8
|
.2
|
.7
|
1.1
|
.9
|
|
Add non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation/amortisation
|
.5
|
.6
|
.9
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
.9
|
Others (defined)
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of depreciable assets
|
(.2)
|
(.2)
|
(3.0)
|
(1.3)
|
(.6)
|
(.7)
|
|
Cash surplus (requirement)
|
1.0
|
1.2
|
(1.9)
|
.4
|
1.5
|
1.1
|
* Repeat the Surplus (Deficit) line from the table above
Projected Use of Authority
|
($ millions)
|
Actual
2003-04
|
Actual
2004-05
|
Main
Estimates
|
Planned
Spending
|
Authorized
|
Actual
Spending
|
|
Authority
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drawdown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at April 1
|
(3.1)
|
(3.1)
|
(2.9)
|
(4.8)
|
(4.4)
|
(2.9)
|
Projected surplus (Drawdown)*
|
1.0
|
1.2
|
(1.9)
|
.4
|
1.5
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
(2.1)
|
(2.1)
|
(4.8)
|
(4.4)
|
(2.9)
|
(1.8)
|
|
Projected Balance at March 31
|
5.9
|
6.1
|
3.2
|
3.6
|
5.1
|
6.2
|
The line "Projected surplus (Drawdown)" matches
the Cash surplus line from the table above.
This table is designed to explain the distribution of funding to a department
at the Branch or Sector level. Any significant variances should be addressed in
a paragraph or two, immediately following the table.
2005-2006
|
Organization
|
Program Activity
|
Program Activity
|
Program Activity
|
Program Activity
|
Total
|
Branch/Sector Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planned Spending
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Authorities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Spending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branch/Sector Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planned Spending
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Authorities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Spending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branch/Sector Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planned Spending
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Authorities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Spending
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2004, Parliament gave legal effect to the User Fees Act with the
aim of strengthening the elements of accountability, oversight, and transparency
in the management of user fee activities. In light of the Act revisions to the
2003 External Charging Policy are expected. Departments are strongly advised to
review the User Fees Act in its entirety and to seek legal counsel when
interpreting the Act's applicability or other implementation requirements.
Section 7 of the User Fees Act requires that every Minister (with
fees) cause a report to be tabled in Parliament containing specific user fee
information. Under the new law, such reports must be tabled annually - on or
before December 31 for the fiscal year having ended the previous March 31.
This User Fees template is provided in the following format such that
departments may make use of the DPR as an existing parliamentary vehicle to meet
the reporting requirements of the User Fees Act .
Departments will note that some of the reporting elements (e.g. forecast
revenues and costs) are characteristic of information traditionally contained in
RPPs. These elements are, nonetheless, required in this presentation in order to
satisfy the requirements of the Act .
Departments are encouraged to be as comprehensive as possible and to respect
the objective of transparency even in areas where complete adherence (due to
lack of information) may not be possible at this time.
A.
User Fee
|
Fee Type
|
Fee Setting
Authority
|
Date Last ModifiedB
|
2005-06
|
Planning Years
|
Forecast Revenue
($000)
|
Actual Revenue
($000)
|
Full Cost
($000)
|
Performance
Standard
|
Performance Results
|
Fiscal Year
|
Forecast Revenue
($000)
|
Estimated Full Cost
($000)
|
Report these figures on an accrual basis or
note otherwise
|
Report these figures on an accrual basis or
note otherwise |
Indicate the name of each user fee as defined by the User Fees Act .
User fees must be identified whether introduced or modified during
2005-06 or not.
|
Identify the fee type as
Regulatory (R)
Or
Other Products and Services (O)
A regulatory fee relates to an activity undertaken by a department
that is integral to the effectiveness of a program and successful
achievement of the program mandate requires moderating, directing,
testing, or approving the actions of external parties.
|
Identify the authority used to set or amend the fee
e.g. Financial Administration Act
Oceans Act
|
Indicate the date on which the fee was introduced or most recently
amended
See section B. below for fees amended in fiscal year 2005-06.
|
Indicate the projected revenue for
2005-06 in $000
|
Indicate actual revenue in $000
|
Indicate the full (estimated) cost
Identify costs incurred by other departments in support of the fee
activity
|
Express as a specific statement of quantity or quality of service
provided
Performance standards must be measurable
e.g. processing time of 60 days per transaction
or
80% satisfaction rate as measured through survey of every service
recipient.
|
Express as a specific measurement of results achieved against
pre-established performance standard
e.g. 60-day processing standard met 87% of the time
or
94% of clients indicated 'good' or 'very good' satisfaction
with service provided.
|
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
|
Provide forecasted revenues for each planning year
|
Provide the estimated full cost for each planning year
Identify costs incurred by other departments in support of the fee
activity
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Total (R)
Sub-total (O)
Total
|
Sub-Total (R)
Sub-total (O)
Total
|
Sub-Total (R)
Sub-total (O)
Total
|
|
|
Sub-total:
Sub-total:
Sub-total:
|
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
Total
|
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
Total
|
B. Date Last Modified:
Where the introduction or most recent amendment to a user fee occurred
in 2005-06 , briefly describe the rationale, consultation, and
circumstances surrounding the fee change, including summary information on
complaints raised during consultation, the establishment of an independent
advisory panel and how that body dealt with complaints.
|
C. Other Information:
Departments may use this area to describe any significant factors or
events that have impacted user fee activities. For example, how
performance results may have been impacted by external factors, or what
measures are being taken to address performance gaps.
|
Departments are encouraged to supplement the template with hyperlinks to
their respective web sites that contain additional detail.
|