Passport Canada
 
Satisfaction Survey

Proactive disclosure
 

2005 National Client Satisfaction Survey



Introduction

  • Fourth national survey of Passport Canada Client Satisfaction Measurement Program
  • Conducted by Circum Network Inc., on behalf of Passport Canada, from April 30 to May 24, 2005
  • 94% of respondents were either "satisfied" or "very satisfied"

Survey Methodology

  • Telephone interviews with 1410 clients, including 1003 with clients using the regular processes, 204 with Canada Post clients and 203 with clients who used the services of Service Canada
  • Participants received a passport during 3-month period prior to Survey
  • Response rate: 49%
  • Estimated sampling error: +/- 3.1% for a proportion of 50%, at a confidence level of 95%
  • Core questions from the Treasury Board Common Measurements Tool

Period of Survey

  • Participants who were issued a passport during January, February and March were surveyed in April and May 2005

Three Indicators of Overall Client Satisfaction

First Indicator of Overall Client Statisfaction

  • Average rating on a 10-point scale from 0 "very dissatisfied" to 10 "very satisfied"
    • 2001 average score: 8.1
    • 2003 average score: 8.1
    • 2004 average score: 7.9
    • 2005 average score: 8.2

Second Indicator of Overall Client Satisfaction

  • Percentage of participants who selected "satisfied" or "very satisfied"
    • Indicator can be misleading: there is a substantial difference between "satisfied" (a mitigated commitment) and "very satisfied" (a strong commitment)
    • 2001 average score: 96%
    • 2003 average score: 92%
    • 2004 average score: 93%
    • 2005 average score: 94%

Third Indicator of Overall Client Satisfaction

  • Percentage of participants who selected "very satisfied," the top category
    • 2001 average score: 31%
    • 2003 average score: 37%
    • 2004 average score: 27%
    • 2005 average score: 35%

Increase of Very Satisfied Clients

  • The third indicator gives a more powerful reading of satisfaction. It is:
    • A solid measure of the health of our performance excellence
    • A more precise indicator of our success (or not) at improving the way we do things at Passport Canada
  • In 2005, 35% selected "very satisfied." This is up 8% from 2004
  • Passport Office cannot expect 100% of its clients to be "very satisfied" with the service process, but:
    • It can aim at increasing the proportion of top-box clients from the present 35% to 50% or even 60%
    • Excellence organizations have achieved such goals

Overall Client Satisfaction

(%)100 Results for 3 Satisfaction Indicators:
2001 2001 = 8.1; 96% (S + VS); 31% (VS)
2003 2003 = 8.1; 92% (S + VS); 37% (VS)
2004 2004 = 7.9; 93% (S + VS); 27% (VS)
2005 2005 = 8.2; 94% (S + VS); 35% (VS)
0 0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
3
3%
3
3%
2
2%
4
4%
4
4%
4
4%
4
4%
65
65%
55
55%
66
65%
59
59%
31
31%
37
37%
27
31%
35
35%
Very DissatisfiedDissatisfiedNeutralSatisfiedVery Satisfied

Declared Client Values

  • In 2005, the top three declared values were:
    • Design of the passport to discourage forgery
    • Security features of the passport
    • Acceptance of the passport by other countries
Top Three Declared Values in

2003-2005
(same items same order)

2001

  1. Design of passport to discourage forgery
  1. Competence of staff
  1. Security features of passport
  1. Passport accepted by other countries
  1. Passport accepted by other countries
  1. Effectiveness of staff
  • The declared values demonstrate:
    • A stabilization in the shift from service reliability in 2001 (competence and effectiveness of staff) to product security from 2003 to 2005
    • Signs of diminishing concerns with security and increase concern with direct service (except for wait time at the office) suggest PPT must keep its finger on the client value pulse
  • In 2005, the three lowest declared values were:
    • The base cost of the passport itself
    • The timing of the payment
    • The number of pages in the passport

Satisfaction With Areas of Service


Communications

Availability of info in access to Telephone Service7.57.5 2005 2005
2004 2004
2003 2003
20012001
Ease of Access to Information7.87.8
7.87.8
7.97.9
7.87.8
Clarity of Written Information7.97.9
7.77.7
7.77.7
7.97.9
Answers provided to your questions8.18.1
7.87.8
8.18.1
88
Communications in your Official Language8.28.2
8.28.2
8.48.4
8.18.1
010
Average Score (Scale of 10)

  • The satisfaction for communications of other items is positive and stable over time.
  • This year we have expanded our survey to include additional questions on our Call Centre services.

Satisfaction with Access to Service

Availability of Parking close to the Office6.66.6 2005 2005
2004 2004
2003 2003
20012001
6.16.1
5.95.9
5.95.9
Convenience of the Office Location7.17.1
6.76.7
6.86.8
6.96.9
Signage to find the Office7.47.4
7.17.1
7.27.2
7.27.2
Hours of Operations7.57.5
77
7.27.2
7.37.3
Ease of Access to Services in Person7.67.6
Flexibility of the Methods of Access7.87.8
7.67.6
7.77.7
7.77.7
Ease of Access to Services by Mail7.97.9
77
Ease of Access to Services by Telephone88
6.56.5
6.86.8
7.37.3
010
Average Score (Scale of 10)
  • Satisfaction with all access items has increased
  • The ratings for the following items increased the most
    • Hours of Operation
    • Ease of access to services by mail
    • Ease of access to services by telephone

Call Centres: Ease of Access

  • Did you encounter any problems using the telephone service?
    • 82% said they did not encounter any problems with the telephone service
    • 16% said they did encounter problems with the telephone service. They were:
      • 75% Excessive wait time
      • 46% Busy Telephone line
      • 40% Never able to talk to a human being
      • 17% Ending up at voice mail

Expectations with Regard to Telephone Wait Times

  • The average expected wait time was approximately 6 minutes
  • The average perceived actual wait was 9.8 minutes
  • The majority of clients expect to wait less than 5 minutes

Satisfaction with the Application Process

List of Qualified Guarantors7.77.7 2005 2005
2004 2004
2003 2003
20012001
7.67.6
7.77.7
7.87.8
Simplicity of Application Forms7.77.7
7.57.5
7.77.7
8.18.1
Overall Requirements7.87.8
7.67.6
7.77.7
7.97.9
Ease of Submitting the Application88
7.37.3
7.47.4
8.18.1
Fairness of the Process88
7.87.8
88
88
Ease of Picking up the Passport8.18.1
88
8.28.2
7.97.9
010
Average Score (Scale of 10)

  • There is a slight increase in overall satisfaction with all application process items
  • The greatest increase is with the ease of submitting the application

Satisfaction with Responsiveness and Reliability

Waiting Time in an Office7.77.7 2005 2005
2004 2004
2003 2003
20012001
5.25.2
5.95.9
6.46.4
Total Time and Effort Required7.77.7
6.76.7
7.17.1
7.67.6
Waiting Time to Receive it by Mail88
7.27.2
7.67.6
7.57.5
Time it took to Produce a Passport88
7.77.7
7.97.9
88
Understanding of your Particular Needs8.18.1
7.77.7
8.18.1
8.18.1
Availability of Application Forms8.38.3
8.28.2
8.48.4
8.28.2
Effectiveness of the Staff8.38.3
8.18.1
8.48.4
8.48.4
Competence of the Staff8.48.4
8.28.2
8.68.6
8.48.4
Courtesy of the Staff8.48.4
8.28.2
8.68.6
8.48.4
010
Average Score (Scale of 10)

Importance of the Service Relationship

  • The most satisfying aspects of service deal directly with the client-employee relationship, and they are:
    • Service responsiveness and reliability in general
    • The courtesy of the staff
    • The competence of the staff
    • The effectiveness of the staff
    • Communications in the client?s official language
  • The five main sources of satisfaction indicate that client satisfaction at PPTC is the result of:
    • A solid overall service relationship that is focussed on the ease of doing business rather than a successful passport document
    • Passport security and effectiveness are seen as basic service components, they are necessary but insufficient to increase satisfaction, because they are a given and simply expected

Expectations with Regard to Wait Time at the Office

  • The importance of wait time at the office has decreased while the satisfaction with this item has increased substantially from 5.2 in 2004 to 7.7 in 2005
  • Expectations of unsatisfied clients reveal that client expectations were not excessive since there was a very close match between what satisfied customers received and what unsatisfied customers expected, as observed in previous years

Expectations with Regard to Delivery of the Passport

  • Ninety-eight percent of clients were satisfied and actually waited 2 weeks
  • The Citizens First report found that the majority of clients found 2 weeks to be an acceptable wait to receive a document needed by mail from the time the application was sent
  • Less than 2% of clients were unsatisfied with the wait time to receive the passport. They actually waited 6 weeks on average but expected to wait 1 week

Satisfaction with Travel Document

Duration of the Validity of the Passport6.96.9 2005 2005
2004 2004
2003 2003
20012001
6.56.5
6.76.7
6.86.8
Number of Pages in the Passport7.77.7
7.57.5
7.77.7
7.67.6
Design of Passports to Avoid Forgery7.87.8
7.37.3
7.57.5
7.27.2
Security Features on the Passport7.87.8
7.67.6
7.87.8
7.67.6
Acceptance by Other Countries88
7.97.9
8.18.1
88
The Passport as a Travel Document8.38.3
8.28.2
8.48.4
8.18.1
010
Average Score (Scale of 10)

  • This graph deals with client satisfaction with the passport as a product and a travel document
  • Most satisfying (highest rating): Acceptance by other countries rates (8.0), this is also one of the top declared values
  • Least satisfying (lowest rating): the duration of the validity period of the passport as in 2001, 2003 and 2004 although the rating has increased to 6.9 from 6.4

Satisfaction with Cost

Convenience of the Payment Method7.97.9 2005 2005
2004 2004
2003 2003
20012001
8.18.1
7.97.9
88
The Timing of the Payment7.77.7
7.97.9
7.67.6
7.77.7
The Base Cost of the Passport Itself6.16.1
5.35.3
5.45.4
6.16.1
010
Average Score (Scale of 10)

  • The least satisfying item is the base cost of the passport itself; however, this item is the third lowest declared values
  • This item has increased to 6.1 from 5.3 in 2004

Receiving Agents

  • Receiving agents include two partners: Canada Post selected outlets and Service Canada selected offices
  • The service experience of clients using receiving agents was generally similar to that of clients using regular channels
  • The only differences were:
    • Increased satisfaction with location-related features
    • Decreased satisfaction with the following items:
      • Cost
      • Turnaround Time
      • Direct Service
      • Communications


Key Improvements in Satisfaction in 2005

  • Key improvements in satisfaction took place in the following areas:
    • Waiting time at the office
      • Satisfaction increase (up to 7.0 from 5.2 on a 10 point scale)
    • Ease of access to services by telephone
      • Satisfaction increase (up to 8.0 from 6.5 on a 10 point scale)
      • 95% said they were satisfied
    • Total time and effort required
      • Satisfaction increase (up to 7.6 from 6.7)


How We Compare


How We Compare With Federal Public Sector

(%)50
2005 2005
2004 2004
2003 2003
2001 2001
0 1
1%
1
1%
1
1%
1
1%
3
3%
4
4%
4
4%
3
3%
47
47%
47
47%
46
46%
47
47%
30
30%
28
28%
32
32%
31
31%
21
21%
22
22%
18
18%
18
18%
Much worseA little worseSameA little betterMuch better

  • Forty-nine percent of clients thought that we were a little better or much better compared to the federal public sector and 47% thought that we were the same

How We Compare With Private Sector

(%)100
2005 2005
2004 2004
2003 2003
2001 2001
0 3
3%
4
4%
4
4%
3
3%
12
12%
12
12%
18
18%
12
12%
64
64%
51
51%
50
50%
57
57%
17
17%
22
22%
20
20%
18
18%
8
8%
12
12%
10
10%
11
11%
Much worseA little worseSameA little betterMuch better

  • Twenty-nine percent of clients thought that we were better compared to the private sector and 57% thought that we were the same


Stated Improvement Priorities (low leverage)

Don't know3636 2005 2005
2004 2004
2003 2003
20012001
3131
4242
5858
Cost2626
2323
2323
1616
Access1616
2222
1717
1111
Rules and process11
1111
88
66
Responsibility and reliability55
77
66
55
Communications66
55
55
33
075
(%)

  • Clients were asked specifically to choose one item for improvement
  • While these items may be the pet peeves of Passport Canada clients they do not affect overall satisfaction ratings as much as other items because they have a low leverage effect

Top Priorities for Improvement

  • The 2005 Survey found four significant ?high satisfaction/high leverage? drivers of satisfaction at Passport Canada:
    • Service responsiveness and reliability
    • Overall communications
    • Access to services
    • The passport as a travel document
  • These items are our strengths and they are the items that have allowed us to achieve such high overall satisfaction ratings therefore Passport Canada must continue to perform as well as it does in these areas

Our Response to Your Feedback

  • We have implemented or are in the process of implementing several initiatives including:
  • Direct Service
    • Increased access through "receiving agents" (Canada Post and Service Canada) and "storefront counters"
    • An online estimated waiting times pilot for applicants applying in person (Richmond, both Calgary offices, Vancouver and Surrey)
    • A Q-MATIC client-routing system to manage and reduce waiting times
    • Simplified application process for passport renewals
    • A Passport on-line electronic application form
  • Security
    • Newly designed passport with enhanced security features making it even more difficult to forge
    • The exploration of biometric technologies for use in the passport
    • An electronic chip will soon become an enhanced security feature of the Canadian Passport
    • Increased security through our participation in cross-departmental, national and international government security initiatives
  • We are confident that these initiatives will help us maintain or exceed the proportion of clients who are very satisfied

Contact Us:

  • This report was prepared by the Office of Continuous Improvement. Your comments are most welcome.
  • To reach us, just cut and paste one of the addresses below into a GroupWise e-mail, enter your comments and send your message.

Strategic and Business Planning Division (PPPS) -Continuous Improvement (OCI)
or
PPPS-OCI