Summary:

The spouse offers dancing classes and pays her husband $4 an hour; the wage was not considered reasonable by CEIC who set it at 50% of profits. Reg. 57(8) and 57(6)(d) concerned only board and lodging. Reg. 43(1) was not referred to, therefore the notion of "co-venturer" does not apply.

Summary:

CEIC must carefully choose the grounds on which it disqualifies the insured person and be able to prove those grounds. It appears that CEIC took the wrong direction by not referring to Reg. 43(1) and the notion of "co-venturer" but rather to Reg. 57(8).