Flag of Canada
Service Canada Government of Canada
 
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Home        
   
Services for you


  

About the Index


  

How to use the Index


  

Issues Search


  

Last Fifty Cases Posted


  

Case Search


  

Judge Search


  

Claimant Search


  

Digest


  

Jurisprudence Library

 

THE INDEX OF JURISPRUDENCE
A SUPPLEMENT TO THE DIGEST OF BENEFIT ENTITLEMENT PRINCIPLES


Case Number: Claimant: Judge: Language: Decision date:
Decision 25241A Magder Debbie  Urie  English 12/22/94 
Decision Appealed: Appellant: Corresponding Case:
Dismissed  No N/A   

Issue:Sub-Issue1Sub-Issue2Sub-Issue3
earnings income in kind 

Summary:

During her employment claimant had the use of an employer-owned vehicle. Would have returned the vehicle when on maternity leave had she known this is income. Income includes non-pecuniary income and the entire income must be deducted. The non-pecuniary benefit must be allocated under s. 58.

Issue:Sub-Issue1Sub-Issue2Sub-Issue3
board of referees jurisdiction guidelines from the Commission 

Summary:

It is true that the form of Application for UI Benefits is deficient when it asks the question "Did you or will you get any other monies from your last employer". But it is not the form which governs. It is the requirements of the Act and its Regulations which must prevail over the form.

     
   
Last modified :  2005-11-24 top Important Notices