| Issue: | Sub-Issue1 | Sub-Issue2 | Sub-Issue3 | | week of unemployment | proof |
Summary: The Board's decision [to not give benefit of doubt to claimant] is unassailable. Ss. 54(1) imposes on him the burden of proof in all cases, on a balance of probabilities. If, after hearing evidence, the Board only had a doubt as to his eligibility, burden clearly not discharged. |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue1 | Sub-Issue2 | Sub-Issue3 | | claim procedure | proof required for entitlement |
Summary: Ss. 40(1) imposes on a claimant the burden of establishing his eligibility in all cases on a balance of probabilities. If, after hearing evidence from both sides, the Board only had a doubt as to claimant's eligibility, he clearly had not discharged the burden upon him. |
