The story of two men caught up in an investigation into the sexual exploitation of children on the internet raises troubling questions about whether or not authorities should publicly release the identities of those who are charged.
by Kellie Hudson
CBC News
Police forces across the country fight a tireless battle against child pornography.
In one year alone, Toronto police seized millions of images of children being
sexually exploited.
While Canadian law enforcement agencies make a dent in the trade of images
of children being violated, their efforts can also take a heavy toll on the
people under scrutiny.
In one recent example, Toronto police held a news conference as part of Operation
Snowball, a Canada-wide investigation into child pornography on the internet.
At the April 16, 2003 conference, they announced the arrest of five men accused
of using their credit cards to buy child porn. A warrant had been issued for
the arrest of a sixth suspect.
The names and ages of all the suspects were released to the media, who turned
out in droves for the announcement.
For one of the men named that day, the arrest and public naming and shaming
sent him into a tailspin. Although the charges against him were eventually withdrawn,
he never recovered from the stigma of being associated with such a despicable
crime.
He lost his job, his friends, his reputation – and eventually his
will to live.
But for another man identified at the same media event, a father of three named
John, the public arrest and jail term proved to be a wake-up call. His arrest
and subsequent jail sentence led him to seek help for a lifelong addiction to
pornography.
The stories of these two men show the often opposing forces at work in law
enforcement: on the one hand is the desire that most people have to get rid
of child pornography – the makers, the abusers and the voyeurs.
And on the other is the fundamental principle of our legal system: the need
and the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty.
NEXT > A brother's tragic tale
|