5/2/2006Emerging Trends in Financial Services and Products: Why Financial Capability is Important for CanadiansNotes for Speech by William G. (Bill) Knight Commissioner, Financial
Consumer Agency of Canada to Canadian Conference of Credit Union
Executives
Vancouver, May 2, 2006
Good morning. It's my pleasure to be here today as you examine the concept
of Innovative Leadership. I see that you have invited some excellent speakers
to talk about that exciting topic. I know that this conference is always a
highlight of the year for Credit Union Central of Canada. And Veronica Feldcamp
always does a fabulous job of putting everything together.
It is a pleasure to be among you. I am here today in a new role, that of the
first commissioner of the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada. It is our job to
engage in two closely linked activities. We regulate market conduct in the
financial services sector. And we engage in the education of financial
consumers.
My tasks at the FCAC involve a significant responsibility, and I find the
job rewarding. I know that credit unions are leaders in CSR, and that consumer
education is something near and dear to your hearts.
You have asked me to talk about emerging issues related to the delivery of
financial services. Anyone talking about "emerging issues" had better
do so with some humility. Predicting the future is a dangerous game. I don't
own a crystal ball. I don't read tea-leaves, and I don't read palms. So I won't
pretend to be a fortune-teller today, but I will talk about three things.
First, about financial consumers and their expectations. We at the FCAC are
learning a lot about this through the many calls that we receive, and through
some of research that we have done.
Secondly, I will talk about some of the emerging trends that I see occurring
in the financial services universe. These observations are based both on our
own experience at the FCAC, and on my own reading of what is occurring in
society.
Thirdly, I want to talk to you about a big idea a concept called
financial capability. By that I mean the ability of consumers to make informed
financial decisions. We the financial services industry (people like
you), government (people like me), non-governmental organizations have
not done a good enough job of fostering this important ability. I believe that
enhanced financial capability will have a dramatic impact on the lives of
Canadians. It's a big idea that should be on the radar screen, and it will be.
So, I want to talk about today's reality for financial consumers, but also
to consider the challenges and opportunities of tomorrow.
I think a hockey analogy will be useful here and it's appropriate, too. Some
of us are pretty well glued to the Stanley Cup playoffs, which are occurring
right now although not in Vancouver because the Canucks didn't make the
cut this year.
Wayne Gretzky is quite possibly the greatest hockey player ever to lace on a
pair of skates. He once described his great success as a player in the
following way: "I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it's
been."
I think that this analogy is a good one to use when talking about emerging
issues in financial services. We, like Wayne Gretzky, want to skate to where
the puck is going to be, not where it's been.
There's an old saying that where you stand on issues depends upon where you
sit. I sit as the commissioner of the FCAC, and it is my job to protect
financial consumers. I want to provide you with a bit of background about our
agency.
Our origins date back to a federal task force called the Future of the
Canadian Financial Services Sector. It was appointed in 1996, and is commonly
known as the "MacKay Task Force" because its chair was a Regina
lawyer named Harold MacKay.
After two years of study and public hearings, MacKay concluded that, 1)
there was a lack of competition among financial institutions; and 2) that there
was an information and a power imbalance between financial institutions and
their customers.
McKay wrote that a vigorous financial system works best in an environment
that encourages competition. He also said that empowered and well-informed
consumers are central to the healthy performance of the marketplace.
McKay made three key recommendations in his report to government. They were
as follows:
More competition in the financial services marketplace;
More protection for consumers enshrined in legislation; and
A redress mechanism for consumer complaints.
Mackay's report led directly to the legislation that created FCAC in 2001.
We are an independent organization and a small one with only 40 people,
all in Ottawa but we have a broad and ambitious mandate.
We engage in two closely linked activities: consumer protection, and
consumer education.
The government has provided us with the mandate and tools to ensure
compliance with consumer protection laws at least those laws that apply
to federally regulated financial services. That makes us a regulator of market
conduct.
And much of our work involves consumer education. That's the second part of
our mandate. We provide consumers with information respecting their rights when
dealing with federally regulated financial institutions.
Allow me to provide one brief example. We have guides and tools and a
website telling people that banks have to cash their government of Canada
cheques, whether or not they are a customer of the institution. And the cheque
must be cashed free of charge.
I should mention that many of our print and website materials are written
in plain language. You in credit unions know all about plain language because
you have been providing it in your literature for years.
We at FCAC hear directly from financial consumers all the time. We have a
call centre and it's a busy one. We have a website that attracts a lot of
traffic. T he information we collect in this way is an incredible resource. It
is a window on what is happening out there in the financial services universe.
I want to talk briefly about the calls we get and the expectations of the
consumers making those calls.
The FCAC came into being in October 2001. This is what has happened in the
past four and a half years: we have received 1.7 million visits to our website,
and that number has been rising dramatically. In 2005-2006, we received 765,000
visits. That's up from 458,000 in the previous year. And that is an increase of
67 per cent.
Now, on to our telephone call centre. Since October 2001, we have received
more than 105,000 inquiries and complaints. That breaks down as follows: 76,000
inquiries and 26,000 complaints. And about 2,600 of those complaints were what
we call self-reported. That means they had escalated to a point where a
financial institution actually reported them in its complaint handling process.
You will no doubt want to know about credit unions in all of this. I can
tell you that we received about 1,600 enquiries and complaints pertaining to
credit unions. These were divided almost evenly, 800 inquiries and 800
complaints. And most people were calling about accounts or loans.
The questions and complaints that consumers have cover the full range of
financial services. H ere are the top five categories of complaints regarding
the conduct of financial institutions:
Refusal to open accounts.
Fees charged on accounts.
Credit cards non-disclosure when issued.
Credit cards again the lack of a monthly statement.
Penalty clauses on mortgages.
So, those are some of the numbers. But I also want to give you a picture of
reality as described by the thousands of people who call us. I want also to
talk about their expectations.
People are busy. We hear a lot about the pressures of work-life balance in
our society. It is entirely common for single parents in some families, and
both spouses in other families, to be in the workplace. Younger families have
their children to get to and from the day care, and school, and the soccer
field. People in middle age may have both adolescent children and aging parents
to care for. In all cases, time and energy are at a premium.
And in today's financial services marketplace, we expect a lot from these
same people. Consumers are faced with a dizzying array of choices. Many people
are struggling with the vast amount of marketing information available to them
on financial products. The complexity of products such as credit cards,
mortgages, and lines of credit are the source of many of the questions and
complaints that we receive.
And sometimes it's more than a matter of complexity. Sometimes the financial
institutions in question are not living up to their responsibilities.
Allow me to provide a few examples.
The Government of Canada has new regulations that set out the circumstances
under which a bank can refuse to set up an account for an individual. Consumers
cannot be refused an account based on a poor credit history, or their being
unemployed. Generally, if they have proper identification, they can open an
account.
Yet, in the information that I provided earlier regarding the complaints we
receive, you will notice that accounts are still being denied to people. The
FCAC is working to increase consumer awareness of their rights and bank
awareness of their obligation to consumers. The mystery shopping we've done
shows that the situation has improved.
Example number two:
In 200304, the Agency began reviewing bank mortgage documents to
determine whether the mortgage prepayment penalty clauses were clear and
accurate. As a result of the review, last year several banks took steps to
ensure that their mortgage penalty clauses use clear language and include all
the information needed by borrowers to determine such costs. Through our work
with the industry in this area, consumers now receive much clearer disclosure
information.
I should mention that we are also using our consumer education mandate to
help consumers in what is a complex market. In addition to helping to clarify
mortgage documents, FCAC is active in helping consumers with other common
products, such as bank accounts and credit cards. As we know, it is often
difficult for people to compare various credit cards with long lists of
possible features. In 2005, we at FCAC released a new web-based interactive
tool for credit cards. It allows consumers to move through a series of
questions to assist them in outlining their specific needs. The tool then gives
the consumer a list of options from the over 200 credit cards in our database.
The tool narrows the list down to only those credit cards that meet the needs
outlined by the consumer.
The credit card tool is an example of the kind of reference that consumers
are telling us they need. We know from the consumers who call us that they want
and expect information they can find easily and information they can understand
and use. The ability to understand a document is a key component to consumer
protection and if that document is to be understood, it must be clear.
Plain language is an absolute necessity if consumers are going to be able to
make better-informed decisions. At FCAC we've been working towards implementing
our own plain language culture. It's not easy, and it's not a change that can
happen over night. We've sent our staff on specialized training, and we've put
together an editorial board of plain language experts who review many of our
newest publications. Right now we're working with MasterCard on a project to
make credit card disclosure documents clearer for readers with lower literacy
levels. We've asked experts to take a look at the documents and suggest
improvements. I expect we'll be able to complete the project by this summer. As
a result, more consumers should be able to read and understand the terms and
conditions of their credit card, helping them to make informed decisions.
I believe that the onus of responsibility for clear communication resides
with the vendor. But, I am also concerned about the amount of information
confronting harried and busy consumers. What we have here is often a mismatch
between some of the most sophisticated marketing departments in the economy,
and people who lack the time, and in some cases the ability, to decode the
information that they are receiving.
This leads me to some of the emerging trends in the financial consumer
marketplace. I will mention just a few. These observations arise from our
experience with the consumers who contact us at FCAC, but it goes beyond that
to my own observations about the financial services industry.
Consumer debt: Consumer debt in Canada has increased to
record levels. Between 1982 and 2001, debt per capita doubled, it is suggested
that this is a result of easier access to credit cards and new mortgages.
Statistics Canada data shows us that the average household debt in 2002 was
equal to 121 per cent of disposable income.
Savings: A related trend shows that individuals and
families are saving less. In 2001, almost half of Canadian households were
spending more than their pre-tax income. Where in 1990 households were saving
13% of their disposable income, they are now saving 0.2% or less
than nothing.
Payday Loans: We are seeing an increased reliance on payday
loan companies. There are more than 1,200 payday lenders in Canada and that
number is increasing. Many of them provide short-term, single-payment loans at
interest rates that consume 30 to 50 per cent of the individual's next pay
cheque.
Government programs tied to our tax system make it
increasingly difficult for some Canadians to access them. I am thinking here of
programs such as the Old Age Supplement and the Guaranteed Income
Supplement.
Pensions: We are seeing reduced pension and retirement
coverage. Canadians are now expected to hold several jobs during their working
lifetime. Their employers are taking less responsibility for pensions than they
once did. A growing number of people have to plan and invest for their own
retirement.
Retirement Savings: An estimated 38 per cent of adult
Canadians say their income and investments will be inadequate or barely
adequate to maintain their standard of living in retirement.
Literacy: Something that disturbs me greatly is the level
of illiteracy in our country. I said earlier that many people are busy and they
don't always take time to read the fine print on financial documents. But
sadly, there is a group of people who can't read that fine print, because their
reading skills are simply not good enough.
Statistics Canada tells us that 42% of the Canadian population reads at or
below a grade school level which is considered a Level 2 literacy. Most
information in the financial marketplace, however, is written at a Level 3
literacy level or above.
All of these trends are disturbing and they lead us to ask what we might do
about them. And that leads me, finally, to financial capability.
Briefly defined, financial capability means that individuals possess
financial knowledge and financial behaviours knowledge and behaviours
that enable people to make informed financial decisions.
The ability to make informed financial decisions, to act with confidence in
financial matters, and to find advice and help when needed all have a
profound effect on the lives of individuals and families. It means being able
to create a personal or family budget; to choose the appropriate bank accounts
and credit cards; and the capability extends to financial planning for higher
education, home ownership, and retirement.
Financial capability is a necessary skill for all citizens who want to
participate fully in Canadian society. For example, people today need financial
capability to be able to navigate increasingly complex government programs such
as Employment Insurance, the Old Age Supplement or social assistance. They may
not receive the full benefit from government services if they lack that
capability.
The problem is that policy makers and service providers often assume that
everyone can make important financial decisions on their own. Or they at least
assume that people have access to resources allowing them to make wise
decisions. But research in countries belonging to the OECD, not to mention some
preliminary Canadian data, does not support these optimistic assumptions.
Financial capability is a concept that is influencing policy and decision-
makers in the United States and Britain. And it is a concept that we are
starting to pay more attention to in Canada as well.
Those who lack financial capability may face increased exposure to predatory
practices, such as those offered by payday loans and pawnshops. They may not be
able to see the long-term impact of the decisions they make today. They may
well be handicapped in establishing a credit history, getting a good deal on a
mortgage, or using registered savings vehicles for retirement. In short, this
lack of access to government and financial services leads to both financial and
social exclusion.
Let me give you an example:
It is my view that low interest rates have driven the sub-prime market to
levels not seen before. The sub-prime market is made up of people who do not
qualify for the lowest interest rates. Suddenly, with sub-prime lending,
consumers who could not have considered purchases, such as a house, are able to
do so. So some institutions line up to offer higher priced mortgages. Interest
rates are low but what if they increase? Can a consumer whose financial
capabilities are low really evaluate the risks involved?
Let's put it another way. Informed consumers can protect themselves by
asking the right questions but how do we provide people with those
questions? What do consumers need? And whose responsibility is it to help them
navigate all this financial information? I certainly believe it is my
responsibility as the commissioner of FCAC, which has a mandate to protect and
inform financial consumers. And I believe it is a task that falls to credit
unions, too, as responsible financial institutions.
But I admit readily that FCAC does not have the resources to ensure that all
Canadian consumers possess financial capability. We have a mandate to provide
consumer education, but we can't do it alone.
So where do we go from here? I want to tell you about a symposium that we
held in June 2005. It was called Canadians and their Money: A National
Symposium on Financial Capability.
We were one of the organizers and patrons of the event. Another of the
groups involved is called the Social and Enterprise Development Innovations
SEDI for short. Some of you will be familiar with SEDI because they
developed the Learn$ave program that several credit unions bought for use by
their members.
The third group involved was the Policy Research Institute, or PRI for
short. The conference actually arose from research that SEDI undertook on
behalf of PRI. That research examined the linkage between financial capability
on the one hand, and poverty and exclusion on the other.
We pulled together about 150 people people from government and
community groups, scholars and social policy experts. They were from Canada,
and from the United States and Europe. We wanted to assess the relevance of
financial capability for social policy, for consumer protection and for
financial services in Canada. We learned a lot from each other in those two
days.
I learned, for example, that only one in five Canadians is confident in her
financial knowledge and abilities. I also learned that two-thirds of Canadians
are functionally illiterate when it comes to investment knowledge.
The consensus arising from our meeting was that the financial information,
training, and advice that we have available is not adequate to meet the needs
of many Canadians, especially disadvantaged Canadians.
It became obvious, as well, that there are big gaps in research and
practice. Nobody has a good snapshot of the financial capability possessed by
Canadians. We know that we have a problem, but we can't describe it
adequately.
Statistics Canada, for example, collects and analyzes information about
household finances. But the agency does not collect information about financial
capability. We need surveys that evaluate the skills that people must have if
they are to possess financial capability.
Some community-based organizations have gained important insights into the
dynamics of financial capability but again, there are many gaps in the
information.
In the United States, the Federal Reserve Bank collects some of the
necessary information. In Britain, the Financial Services Authority has
developed some effective survey instruments, and it is also testing delivery
approaches through pilot projects.
I came away from our symposium convinced that governments, financial
institutions, and community organizations should put their heads together and
find a way to increase financial capability in our country. This is a critical
set of life skills for all of us. The goal, then, should be to ensure that all
Canadians have access to adequate financial information, education, and advice.
Several recommendations came out of the symposium.
Research: We need more research and we have to set out an
agenda to achieve it. We want to know more about the current state of financial
capability in Canada. And we have to explore the relationship between financial
capability and basic literacy, financial inclusion and financial security.
Governments: Governments at all levels have an important
role to play. They should not take sole responsibility for improving financial
capability. But they should facilitate dialogue on the topic, support research
and innovation, and integrate financial capability into policymaking and
program delivery.
Private sector: There is role for the private sector,
especially the financial sector. You should be expanding the amount of
financial information, training and advice provided to client groups,
especially groups that are traditionally underserved.
Community\voluntary sector: Finally, there is a crucial
role here for the community and voluntary sector, because they are uniquely
placed to reach out to the most disadvantaged citizens. It is those people who
are most at risk when it comes to financial capability.
We have already taken some practical steps arising from our symposium. FCAC
is working with SEDI to move the issue forward and create more awareness.
We have \worked with SEDI to prepare a database of institutions that
provide financial capability training. I am delighted to see several credit
unions on our list. I will recognize just one or two but I know many others are
active.
Van City is one example of a credit union that is supporting financial
capability through its charitable giving to community organizations.
Assinniboine Credit Union in Winnipeg also does work in partnership
with SEED Winnipeg, particularly through advice and education for new
entrepreneurs and recipients of its micro-loans. They've also been involved in
the learn$ave project by offering several of the savings accounts.
In Quebec, Caisse Desjardins has also been involved with learn$ave -
again by offering low-cost savings accounts to participants.
Last but not least, Metro Credit Union ran a pilot project with SEDI a
few years ago. They contracted with SEDI to develop a new financial capability
curriculum and deliver it to small groups of their clients, with a focus on low-
income clients, which had very positive feedback.
I see credit unions playing a leading role in developing financial
capability. You have a wealth of experience as financial institutions. You have
a well-deserved reputation for responsiveness to customers. You have been
incorporating plain language for years in the information accompanying your
products and services. And perhaps most importantly, you have a broadly based
and democratic structure that touches the lives of millions of Canadians. When
your member credit unions decide to take something on, they get results. Who
better than you to help improve the financial capability of Canadians?
I am convinced of the importance of enhancing financial capability. We have
an admirable social safety net in Canada. That net has some holes in it, I
know, but think about the importance of our health care system, employment
insurance, public pensions, and the basic assistance available to people in
need.
We have a safety net that is a testament to our humanity. But when it comes
to financial capability, we leave people alone to sink or swim. We assume that
all individuals have an equal capacity to make good financial decisions. But
the reality is that many people do not have the tools they need to make those
decisions in an increasingly complex financial universe.
We need a financial services safety net, and the beauty is that it is based
on providing knowledge. It is based on life-long learning.
Increased financial capability can have a positive impact on priorities that
we share as Canadians.
It will promote social inclusion because people will be able to make
better financial decisions and to build assets.
It will increase our country's economic efficiency because people
will make better consumer choices and create a more dynamic market for
financial services.
It will increase the effectiveness of government programs because a
financially capable population will allow for a greater efficacy in program
delivery. In fact, a financially capable population may actually result in a
reduced need for certain government benefits.
You asked me today to talk about emerging issues related to the delivery of
financial services. There are many issues out there, and I have outlined some
them:
Consumers who are harried and overwrought
Increasing consumer debt
Lower consumer savings
A level of saving that is not adequate for retirement
Persistently high levels of functional illiteracy
A high level of financial illiteracy and capability.
Those are the problems. But I also come to you today with a big idea, and it
is this: Many of the disturbing trends that I have outlined can be tackled by
improving the financial capability of Canadians.
We can help people to develop the skills and confidence to be aware of
financial opportunities.
We can help them to make informed financial choices.
We can show them where to look for help in making those choices
In all of this we will be taking effective action to improve their financial
well-being. This benefits our entire economy.
This is a goal worth pursuing.
And credit unions are well positioned to help make it happen.
That, to quote Wayne Gretzky is where the puck is going to be. We should be
there too.
|