36th Parliament, 2nd Session
EDITED HANSARD • NUMBER 63
CONTENTS
Monday, March 13, 2000
| PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS
|
1105
| WESTRAY MINE
|
| Motion
|
| Mr. Bill Casey |
1110
1115
| Ms. Alexa McDonough |
1120
| Mr. Scott Brison |
1125
1130
| Mr. Lee Morrison |
1135
| Mr. Michel Bellehumeur |
1140
| Motion
|
1145
| Mr. Peter Stoffer |
1150
| Division on amendment deferred
|
| PRIVILEGE
|
| Amendments to Bill C-20
|
| Mrs. Suzanne Tremblay |
1155
| Mr. Gilles Duceppe |
1200
| Mr. Stéphane Bergeron |
1205
| The Speaker |
| GOVERNMENT ORDERS
|
| AN ACT TO GIVE EFFECT TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR CLARITY AS SET
|
| Bill C-20—Time allocation motion
|
| Hon. Don Boudria |
1210
1300
(Division 760)
| Motion agreed to
|
| POINTS OF ORDER
|
| Motions in amendmentto Bill C-20—Speaker's ruling
|
| The Speaker |
1305
| PRIVILEGE
|
| Amendments to bill C-20—Speaker's ruling
|
1310
| AN ACT TO GIVE EFFECT TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR CLARITY AS SET
|
| Bill C-20. Report stage
|
| Mr. Reg Alcock |
1315
| Mr. Grant Hill |
1320
| Mr. Bill Blaikie |
1325
1330
| Mr. André Bachand |
1335
1340
| Mr. Yvan Bernier |
1345
1350
| Amendement
|
1355
| Mr. Lynn Myers |
1400
| STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS
|
| COMMONWEALTH DAY
|
| Ms. Sarmite Bulte |
| RELIGION
|
| Mr. Jim Abbott |
| DAN DOYLE
|
| Mr. John Finlay |
| SENIORS
|
| Mr. Andrew Telegdi |
| MINING INDUSTRY
|
| Mr. Guy St-Julien |
1405
| TARA SLOAN
|
| Mr. Eric Lowther |
| FIGHT AGAINST RACISM
|
| Mr. Bernard Patry |
| BILL C-20
|
| Mr. René Laurin |
| FARM SAFETY
|
| Mrs. Rose-Marie Ur |
| CURLING
|
| Mr. Jay Hill |
| CHIEF JOE MATHIAS
|
| Mr. Lou Sekora |
1410
| OVERSEAS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
|
| Mr. Dennis Gruending |
| THE LATE MARCEL PÉPIN
|
| Mrs. Francine Lalonde |
| JOB CREATION IN CANADA
|
| Mrs. Marlene Jennings |
| REFUGEES
|
| Mr. David Price |
| JUNO AWARDS
|
| Ms. Eleni Bakopanos |
1415
| ORAL QUESTION PERIOD
|
| HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
|
| Mr. Preston Manning |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Mr. Preston Manning |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Mr. Preston Manning |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Miss Deborah Grey |
1420
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Miss Deborah Grey |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Mr. Gilles Duceppe |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Mr. Gilles Duceppe |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Mr. Paul Crête |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Mr. Paul Crête |
1425
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| HEALTH CARE
|
| Ms. Alexa McDonough |
| Hon. Allan Rock |
| Ms. Alexa McDonough |
| Hon. Allan Rock |
| HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
|
| Mr. Peter MacKay |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| INDIAN AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT
|
| Mr. Peter MacKay |
| Hon. Robert D. Nault |
| HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
|
| Mrs. Diane Ablonczy |
1430
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Mrs. Diane Ablonczy |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Mrs. Christiane Gagnon |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Mrs. Christiane Gagnon |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Mr. Monte Solberg |
| Hon. Herb Gray |
| Mr. Monte Solberg |
1435
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| CINAR
|
| Mr. Stéphane Bergeron |
| Hon. Martin Cauchon |
| Mr. Stéphane Bergeron |
| Hon. Sheila Copps |
| HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
|
| Ms. Val Meredith |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Ms. Val Meredith |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Mr. Bernard Bigras |
1440
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| FOREIGN AFFAIRS
|
| Ms. Jean Augustine |
| Hon. Lloyd Axworthy |
| HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
|
| Mr. Chuck Strahl |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Mr. Chuck Strahl |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| HEALTH CARE
|
| Ms. Judy Wasylycia-Leis |
1445
| Hon. Allan Rock |
| Ms. Judy Wasylycia-Leis |
| Hon. Allan Rock |
| AGRICULTURE
|
| Mr. Rick Borotsik |
| Hon. Lyle Vanclief |
| Mr. Rick Borotsik |
| Hon. Lyle Vanclief |
| HEALTH CARE
|
| Mr. Paul Szabo |
| Hon. Allan Rock |
| HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
|
| Mr. Inky Mark |
1450
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| PUBLIC WORKS
|
| Mr. Gilles Duceppe |
| Hon. Alfonso Gagliano |
| GASOLINE PRICES
|
| Mr. Yvon Godin |
| Hon. Ralph E. Goodale |
| HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
|
| Mr. André Harvey |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Mrs. Diane Ablonczy |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
1455
| THE ENVIRONMENT
|
| Hon. Charles Caccia |
| Hon. Ralph E. Goodale |
| HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
|
| Mr. Yves Rocheleau |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION
|
| Ms. Libby Davies |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
|
| Mr. André Harvey |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
| Mrs. Diane Ablonczy |
| Hon. Jane Stewart |
1500
| PRIVILEGE
|
| Legislative Services
|
| Mr. Chuck Cadman |
1505
| The Speaker |
| Mrs. Diane Ablonczy |
1510
| POINTS OF ORDER
|
| Speaker of the House of Commons
|
| Mr. Gilles Duceppe |
| Motion
|
| ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
|
| GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS
|
| Mr. Gar Knutson |
1515
| INTERPARLIAMENTARY DELEGATIONS
|
| Mr. George Proud |
| PARLIAMENT OF CANADA ACT
|
| Bill C-450. Introduction and first reading
|
| Mr. Peter Stoffer |
| PETITIONS
|
| Yugoslavia
|
| Ms. Val Meredith |
| Highways
|
| Ms. Val Meredith |
| Pornography
|
| Mr. Lou Sekora |
| Action Canada for Population and Development
|
| Mr. Richard M. Harris |
| Child Pornography
|
| Mr. Richard M. Harris |
1520
| Refugees
|
| Mr. Richard M. Harris |
| Pensions
|
| Mr. Richard M. Harris |
| Mammography
|
| Mr. Ted McWhinney |
| Bill C-20
|
| Mr. Antoine Dubé |
| Child Poverty
|
| Mrs. Karen Redman |
| Immigration Taxes
|
| Mrs. Karen Redman |
| Marriage
|
| Mr. Eric Lowther |
| Child Pornography
|
| Mr. John Bryden |
| Mammography
|
| Mr. John Bryden |
| Criminal Code
|
| Mr. John Bryden |
| Fuel Prices
|
| Mr. Gurbax Singh Malhi |
| Immigration Taxes
|
| Mr. Gurbax Singh Malhi |
1525
| Child Poverty
|
| Mr. Gurbax Singh Malhi |
| Mammography
|
| Mr. Gurbax Singh Malhi |
| QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER
|
| Mr. Gar Knutson |
| Hon. Elinor Caplan |
| STARRED QUESTIONS
|
| Mr. Gar Knutson |
| Mr. Gar Knutson |
| GOVERNMENT ORDERS
|
| AN ACT TO GIVE EFFECT TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR CLARITY AS SET
|
| Bill C-20. Report stage
|
| Mr. Lynn Myers |
1530
| Mr. Steve Mahoney |
1535
1540
1545
| Mr. Pierre de Savoye |
1550
| Amendment
|
1555
| Mr. Ted McWhinney |
1600
1605
| Mr. John Bryden |
1610
1615
| Mr. Claude Bachand |
1620
1625
| Mr. John McKay |
1630
1635
| Mr. René Canuel |
1640
1645
| Mr. John Finlay |
1650
1655
| Mr. Dennis J. Mills |
1700
1705
| Mr. Réal Ménard |
1710
1715
| Ms. Jean Augustine |
1720
| Mr. Serge Cardin |
1725
1730
| Mrs. Karen Redman |
1735
1740
1745
| BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
|
| Hon. Don Boudria |
| AN ACT TO GIVE EFFECT TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR CLARITY AS SET
|
| Bill C-20. Report stage
|
| Mr. Roy Bailey |
1750
| Mrs. Francine Lalonde |
1755
1800
| Ms. Sarmite Bulte |
1805
1810
| Mr. Mac Harb |
1815
| Division on Motion No. 1 deferred
|
| Division on the amendment deferred
|
| Division on Motion No. 3 deferred
|
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 13
|
| Mr. Réal Ménard |
| Motion No. 14
|
| Mr. Yves Rocheleau |
| Motion No. 15
|
| Mr. Bernard Bigras |
| Motion No. 18
|
| Mr. Yvan Bernier |
| Motion No. 19
|
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 21
|
1820
| Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire |
| Motion No. 22
|
| Mr. Ghislain Fournier |
| Motion No. 23
|
| Mr. Antoine Dubé |
| Motions Nos. 24 and 26
|
| Mrs. Christiane Gagnon |
| Motion No. 27
|
| Mr. Pierre de Savoye |
| Motion No. 28
|
| Mr. Gérard Asselin |
| Motion No. 29
|
| Ms. Hélène Alarie |
| Motion No. 30
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 32
|
| Mr. Maurice Dumas |
| Motions Nos. 33 and 34
|
| Mr. Maurice Godin |
| Motion No. 35
|
| Mrs. Monique Guay |
| Motion No. 36
|
| Mrs. Pierrette Venne |
| Motion No. 37
|
| Mr. René Canuel |
| Motion No. 38
|
| Mr. Claude Bachand |
| Motion No. 39
|
| Mr. Benoît Sauvageau |
| Motion No. 40
|
| Mr. Daniel Turp |
| Motion No. 41
|
| Mr. Paul Mercier |
| Motion No. 42
|
1825
| Mr. René Laurin |
| Motions Nos. 43 and 44
|
| Mr. Odina Desrochers |
| Motion No. 48
|
| Mr. Bernard Bigras |
| Motion No. 49
|
| Mr. Maurice Godin |
| Motion No. 50
|
| Mr. Yvan Bernier |
| Motion No. 51
|
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 52
|
| Mr. Ghislain Fournier |
| Motion No. 53
|
| Mr. Pierre de Savoye |
| Motion No. 54
|
| Ms. Hélène Alarie |
| Motion No. 55
|
| Mr. Maurice Godin |
| Motion No. 56
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 57
|
| Mr. René Canuel |
| Motion No. 58
|
| Mr. Benoît Sauvageau |
| Motion No. 59
|
1830
| Mr. Daniel Turp |
| Motion No. 60
|
| Mr. Gilles-A. Perron |
| Motion No. 61
|
| Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold |
| Motion No. 62
|
| Mr. Gérard Asselin |
| Motion No. 63
|
| Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien |
| Motion No. 64
|
| Mr. Benoît Sauvageau |
| Motion No. 65
|
| Mr. Bill Blaikie |
| Motions Nos. 66 and 67
|
| Motion No. 68
|
| Division on Motion 13 deferred
|
| Division on Motion No. 18 deferred
|
1835
| Division on Motion No. 48 deferred
|
| Division on Motion No. 50 deferred
|
| Division on Motion No. 61 deferred
|
| Division on Motion No. 62 deferred
|
| Division on Motion No. 65 deferred
|
| Division on Motion No. 68 deferred
|
| Mr. René Laurin |
| Motion No. 69
|
| Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire |
| Motion No. 70
|
1840
| Mr. Daniel Turp |
| Motion No. 71
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 72
|
| Mr. Paul Mercier |
| Motion No. 73
|
| Mr. Bill Blaikie |
| Motion No. 74
|
| Mr. Claude Bachand |
| Motion No. 75
|
| Mr. Bill Blaikie |
| Motion No. 76
|
| Mrs. Maud Debien |
| Motion No. 77
|
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 78
|
| Mr. Bill Blaikie |
| Motions Nos. 79 and 80
|
| Mrs. Monique Guay |
| Motion No. 81
|
| Mr. Grant Hill |
| Motions Nos. 82 and 83
|
1845
| Division on Motion No. 69 deferred
|
| Division on Motion No. 72 deferred
|
| Division on Motion No. 78 deferred.
|
| Division on Motion No. 81 deferred.
|
| Division on Motion No. 82 deferred
|
| Division on Motion No. 83 deferred
|
1850
| Mr. Bill Blaikie |
| Motion No. 85
|
| Mr. Yves Rocheleau |
| Motion No. 86
|
| Mr. Pat Martin |
| Motion No. 87
|
| Mr. Grant Hill |
| Motions Nos. 88 and 89
|
| Division on Motion No. 85 deferred
|
| Division on Motion No. 86 deferred
|
1855
| Division on Motion No. 88 deferred
|
| Mr. Bill Blaikie |
| Motion No. 90
|
| Mrs. Monique Guay |
| Motion No. 91
|
1900
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 92
|
| Mrs. Pierrette Venne |
| Motion No. 93
|
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 94
|
| Ms. Hélène Alarie |
| Motion No. 95
|
| Mrs. Suzanne Tremblay |
| Motion No. 96
|
| Mrs. Maud Debien |
| Motion No. 97
|
1905
| Mr. Yvan Bernier |
| Motion No. 98
|
| Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire |
| Motion No. 99
|
| Mrs. Monique Guay |
| Motion No. 100
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 101
|
| Mr. Maurice Godin |
| Motion No. 102
|
| Mr. Claude Bachand |
| Motion No. 103
|
1910
| Mr. René Canuel |
| Motion No. 104
|
| Mr. Odina Desrochers |
| Motion No. 105
|
| Mr. Daniel Turp |
| Motion No. 106
|
| Mr. Bernard Bigras |
| Motion No. 107
|
| Mr. Antoine Dubé |
| Motion No. 108
|
| Mr. Réal Ménard |
| Motion No. 109
|
1915
| Mrs. Pierrette Venne |
| Motion No. 110
|
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 111
|
| Ms. Hélène Alarie |
| Motion No. 112
|
| Mr. Stéphan Tremblay |
| Motion No. 113
|
1920
| Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold |
| Motion No. 114
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 115
|
| Mr. Pierre de Savoye |
| Motion No. 116
|
| Mrs. Maud Debien |
| Motion No. 117
|
| Mr. Yvan Bernier |
| Motion No. 118
|
| Mr. Maurice Godin |
| Motion No. 119
|
| Mr. Claude Bachand |
| Motion No. 120
|
1925
| Mr. Gilles-A. Perron |
| Motion No. 121
|
| Mr. René Laurin |
| Motion No. 122
|
| Mrs. Pauline Picard |
| Motion No. 123
|
| Mr. René Canuel |
| Motion No. 124
|
| Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold |
| Motion No. 125
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 126
|
1930
| Mr. Pierre de Savoye |
| Motion No. 127
|
| Mr. Gérard Asselin |
| Motion No. 128
|
| Motion No. 129
|
| Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien |
| Motion No. 130
|
| Mr. Gilles-A. Perron |
| Motion No. 131
|
1935
| Mr. René Laurin |
| Motion No. 132
|
| Mrs. Pauline Picard |
| Motion No. 133
|
| Mr. Gérard Asselin |
| Motion No. 134
|
| Mr. Benoît Sauvageau |
| Motion No. 135
|
| Mr. Paul Mercier |
| Motion No. 136
|
| Mr. Yves Rocheleau |
| Motion No. 137
|
1940
| Motion No. 138
|
| Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien |
| Motion No. 139
|
| Mr. Benoît Sauvageau |
| Motion No. 140
|
| Mr. Paul Mercier |
| Motion No. 141
|
1945
| Mr. Ghislain Fournier |
| Motion No. 142
|
| Mr. Maurice Dumas |
| Motion No. 143
|
| Mr. Antoine Dubé |
| Motion No. 144
|
| Mr. Yves Rocheleau |
| Motion No. 145
|
| Mr. Ghislain Fournier |
| Motion No. 146
|
1950
| Mr. Maurice Dumas |
| Motion No. 147
|
| Mrs. Christiane Gagnon |
| Motion No. 148
|
| Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire |
| Motion No. 149
|
| Mr. Benoît Sauvageau |
| Motion No. 150
|
| Mrs. Pauline Picard |
| Motion No. 151
|
| Mrs. Maud Debien |
| Motion No. 152
|
1955
| Mr. Paul Mercier |
| Motion No. 153
|
| Mr. Gérard Asselin |
| Motion No. 154
|
| Motion No. 155
|
| Mr. Louis Plamondon |
| Motion No. 156
|
| Mr. Pierre de Savoye |
| Motion No. 157
|
| Ms. Hélène Alarie |
| Motion No. 158
|
| Mr. René Laurin |
| Motion No. 159
|
| Mr. René Canuel |
| Motion No. 160
|
| Mrs. Pierrette Venne |
| Motion No. 161
|
| Mr. Gilles-A. Perron |
| Motion No. 162
|
2000
| Mr. Yvan Bernier |
| Motion No. 163
|
| Mr. Maurice Godin |
| Motion No. 164
|
| Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold |
| Motion No. 165
|
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 166
|
| Mr. Claude Bachand |
| Motion No. 167
|
| Mr. Serge Cardin |
| Motion No. 168
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 169
|
| Mr. Antoine Dubé |
| Motion No. 170
|
| Mr. Ghislain Fournier |
| Motion No. 171
|
| Mr. René Canuel |
| Motion No. 172
|
2005
| Mr. Maurice Dumas |
| Motion No. 173
|
| Mr. Maurice Godin |
| Motion No. 174
|
| Mr. Yves Rocheleau |
| Motion No. 175
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 176
|
| Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold |
| Motion No. 177
|
| Mr. Yvan Bernier |
| Motion No. 178
|
2010
| Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire |
| Motion No. 179
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 180
|
| Mr. Bernard Bigras |
| Motions Nos. 181 and 182
|
| Mr. Odina Desrochers |
| Motion No. 183
|
| Mr. Daniel Turp |
| Motions Nos. 184 and 185
|
2015
| Mr. Bernard Bigras |
| Motion No. 186
|
| Mr. Odina Desrochers |
| Motion No. 187
|
| Mr. Yvan Bernier |
| Motion No. 188
|
| Mrs. Pierrette Venne |
| Motion No. 189
|
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 190
|
| Mrs. Christiane Gagnon |
| Motion No. 191
|
| Mrs. Monique Guay |
| Motion No. 192
|
2020
| Mr. Daniel Turp |
| Motion No. 193
|
| Mrs. Pierrette Venne |
| Motion No. 194
|
| Mr. Claude Bachand |
| Motion No. 195
|
| Mr. Gilles-A. Perron |
| Motion No. 196
|
| Mrs. Pauline Picard |
| Motion No. 197
|
| Mr. Odina Desrochers |
| Motion No. 198
|
| Mr. Réal Ménard |
| Motion No. 199
|
| Mr. Odina Desrochers |
| Motion No. 200
|
2025
| Mrs. Christiane Gagnon |
| Motion No. 201
|
| Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire |
| Motion No. 202
|
| Mr. Serge Cardin |
| Motion No. 203
|
| Mr. Benoît Sauvageau |
| Motion No. 204
|
| Mr. Daniel Turp |
| Motion No. 205
|
| Mrs. Maud Debien |
| Motion No. 206
|
| Mr. Paul Mercier |
| Motion No. 207
|
2030
| Mr. Maurice Dumas |
| Motion No. 208
|
| Mr. Ghislain Fournier |
| Motion No. 209
|
| Mr. Maurice Dumas |
| Motion No. 210
|
| Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien |
| Motion No. 211
|
| Mr. Yves Rocheleau |
| Motion No. 212
|
| Mrs. Christiane Gagnon |
| Motion No. 213
|
| Mr. Benoît Sauvageau |
| Motion No. 214
|
2035
| Mr. Paul Mercier |
| Motion No. 215
|
| Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien |
| Motion No. 216
|
| Mr. Antoine Dubé |
| Motion No. 217
|
| Ms. Hélène Alarie |
| Motion No. 218
|
| Mr. Michel Guimond |
| Motion No. 219
|
| Mr. Yves Rocheleau |
| Motion No. 220
|
| Mr. Louis Plamondon |
| Motion No. 221
|
| Mr. Gérard Asselin |
| Motion No. 222
|
| Mr. Réal Ménard |
| Motion No. 223
|
| Mrs. Pauline Picard |
| Motion No. 224
|
2040
| Mr. Gilles-A. Perron |
| Motion No. 225
|
| Mr. René Laurin |
| Motion No. 226
|
| Mr. René Canuel |
| Motion No. 227
|
| Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold |
| Motion No. 228
|
| Mr. René Laurin |
| Motion No. 229
|
| Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire |
| Motion No. 230
|
| Mr. Pierre de Savoye |
| Motion No. 231
|
| Mr. Gilles-A. Perron |
| Motion No. 232
|
| Mr. René Canuel |
| Motion No. 233
|
| Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold |
| Motion No. 234
|
2045
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 235
|
| Mr. Pierre de Savoye |
| Motion No. 236
|
| Mr. Maurice Godin |
| Motion No. 237
|
| Mr. Yvan Bernier |
| Motion No. 238
|
| Mrs. Monique Guay |
| Motion No. 239
|
| Mr. Claude Bachand |
| Motion No. 240
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 241
|
| Mr. Serge Cardin |
| Motion No. 242
|
| Mrs. Maud Debien |
| Motion No. 243
|
2050
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 244
|
| Mr. Maurice Godin |
| Motion No. 245
|
| Ms. Hélène Alarie |
| Motion No. 246
|
| Mrs. Pauline Picard |
| Motion No. 247
|
| Mr. Louis Plamondon |
| Motion No. 248
|
| Mr. Yvan Bernier |
| Motion No. 249
|
| Mr. Claude Bachand |
| Motion No. 250
|
| Mrs. Christiane Gagnon |
| Motion No. 252
|
| Mr. Pierre de Savoye |
| Motion No. 253
|
| Mr. Gilles-A. Perron |
| Motion No. 254
|
| Mr. Antoine Dubé |
| Motion No. 255
|
| Mr. René Laurin |
| Motion No. 256
|
| Mr. Gérard Asselin |
| Motion No. 257
|
2055
| Mr. René Laurin |
| Motion No. 258
|
| Motion No. 259
|
| Mr. Pierre de Savoye |
| Motion No. 260
|
| Motion No. 261
|
| Mr. Réal Ménard |
| Motion No. 262
|
| Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien |
| Motion No. 263
|
| Mr. Benoît Sauvageau |
| Motion No. 264
|
| Mr. Paul Mercier |
| Motion No. 265
|
| Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien |
| Motion No. 266
|
| Mr. Ghislain Fournier |
| Motion No. 267
|
2100
| Mr. René Canuel |
| Motion No. 268
|
| Mr. Maurice Dumas |
| Motion No. 269
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 270
|
| Mr. Antoine Dubé |
| Motion No. 271
|
| Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold |
| Motion No. 272
|
| Mr. Yves Rocheleau |
| Motion No. 273
|
| Mrs. Maud Debien |
| Motion No. 274
|
2105
| Mr. Ghislain Fournier |
| Motion No. 275
|
| Mr. Yvan Bernier |
| Motion No. 276
|
| Mr. Serge Cardin |
| Motion No. 277
|
| Mr. Claude Bachand |
| Motion No. 278
|
| Ms. Hélène Alarie |
| Motion No. 280
|
| Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire |
| Motion No. 281
|
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 282
|
| Mrs. Monique Guay |
| Motion No. 283
|
2110
| Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold |
| Motion No. 284
|
| Mr. Louis Plamondon |
| Motion No. 285
|
| Mr. Réal Ménard |
| Motion No. 286
|
| Ms. Hélène Alarie |
| Motion No. 287
|
| Mrs. Pierrette Venne |
| Motion No. 288
|
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 289
|
| Mr. Louis Plamondon |
| Motion No. 290
|
| Mr. Ghislain Fournier |
| Motion No. 291
|
2115
| Mr. Claude Bachand |
| Motion No. 292
|
| Mrs. Christiane Gagnon |
| Motion No. 293
|
| Mr. René Canuel |
| Motion No. 294
|
| Mr. Maurice Dumas |
| Motion No. 295
|
| Mr. Bernard Bigras |
| Motion No. 296
|
| Mrs. Maud Debien |
| Motion No. 297
|
2120
| Mr. Serge Cardin |
| Motion No. 298
|
| Mr. Daniel Turp |
| Motion No. 299
|
| Mrs. Pierrette Venne |
| Motion No. 300
|
| Ms. Hélène Alarie |
| Motion No. 301
|
| Mr. Serge Cardin |
| Motion No. 302
|
| Mr. Louis Plamondon |
| Motion No. 303
|
| Mr. Bernard Bigras |
| Motion No. 304
|
| Mr. Maurice Godin |
| Motion No. 305
|
| Mrs. Monique Guay |
| Motion No. 306
|
| Mr. Odina Desrochers |
| Motion No. 307
|
| Mr. Bernard Bigras |
| Motion No. 308
|
| Mrs. Maud Debien |
| Motion No. 309
|
2125
| Mrs. Pierrette Venne |
| Motion No. 310
|
| Mr. Maurice Godin |
| Motion No. 311
|
| Mrs. Monique Guay |
| Motion No. 312
|
| Mr. Daniel Turp |
| Motion No. 313
|
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 314
|
| Mr. Odina Desrochers |
| Motion No. 315
|
| Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire |
| Motion No. 316
|
| Mr. Bernard Bigras |
| Motion No. 317
|
| Mr. Daniel Turp |
| Motion No. 318
|
| Mr. Odina Desrochers |
| Motion No. 319
|
| Mrs. Monique Guay |
| Motion No. 320
|
| Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire |
| Motion No. 321
|
| Mr. Odina Desrochers |
| Motion No. 322
|
2130
| Mr. Daniel Turp |
| Motion No. 323
|
| Mr. Bernard Bigras |
| Motion No. 324
|
| Mr. Benoît Sauvageau |
| Motion No. 325
|
| Mr. Serge Cardin |
| Motion No. 326
|
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 327
|
| Mrs. Monique Guay |
| Motion No. 328
|
| Mrs. Pierrette Venne |
| Motion No. 329
|
| Mr. Yvan Bernier |
| Motion No. 330
|
| Mrs. Maud Debien |
| Motion No. 331
|
| Mr. Louis Plamondon |
| Motion No. 332
|
| Ms. Hélène Alarie |
| Motion No. 333
|
| Mr. Maurice Godin |
| Motion No. 334
|
| Mr. Claude Bachand |
| Motion No. 335
|
| Mr. René Canuel |
| Motion No. 336
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 337
|
| Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold |
| Motion No. 338
|
2135
| Mr. Pierre de Savoye |
| Motion No. 339
|
| Mr. Gilles-A. Perron |
| Motion No. 340
|
| Mr. René Laurin |
| Motion No. 341
|
| Mrs. Pauline Picard |
| Motion No. 342
|
| Mr. Michel Guimond |
| Motion No. 343
|
| Mr. Gérard Asselin |
| Motion No. 344
|
| Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien |
| Motion No. 345
|
| Mr. Benoît Sauvageau |
| Motion No. 346
|
| Mr. Paul Mercier |
| Motion No. 347
|
| Mr. Yves Rocheleau |
| Motion No. 348
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 349
|
| Mrs. Christiane Gagnon |
| Motion No. 350
|
| Mr. Serge Cardin |
| Motion No. 351
|
| Mr. Réal Ménard |
| Motion No. 352
|
2140
| Ms. Hélène Alarie |
| Motion No. 353
|
| Mr. Ghislain Fournier |
| Motion No. 354
|
| Mrs. Maud Debien |
| Motion No. 355
|
| Mr. Maurice Dumas |
| Motion No. 356
|
| Mrs. Pierrette Venne |
| Motion No. 357
|
| Mr. Louis Plamondon |
| Motion No. 358
|
| Mr. Bernard Bigras |
| Motion No. 359
|
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 360
|
| Mr. Yvan Bernier |
| Motion No. 361
|
| Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire |
| Motion No. 362
|
| Mr. René Canuel |
| Motion No. 363
|
| Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold |
| Motion No. 364
|
| Mr. Maurice Godin |
| Motion No. 365
|
2145
| Mr. Daniel Turp |
| Motion No. 366
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 367
|
| Mr. Claude Bachand |
| Motion No. 368
|
| Mrs. Monique Guay |
| Motion No. 369
|
| Mr. Pierre de Savoye |
| Motion No. 370
|
| Mr. Gérard Asselin |
| Motion No. 371
|
| Mr. Odina Desrochers |
| Motion No. 372
|
| Mr. Gilles-A. Perron |
| Motion No. 373
|
| Mrs. Pauline Picard |
| Motion No. 374
|
| Motion No. 375
|
| Mr. René Laurin |
| Motion No. 376
|
| Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien |
| Motion No. 377
|
| Mr. Maurice Dumas |
| Motion No. 378
|
| Mr. Paul Mercier |
| Motion No. 379
|
| Mrs. Christiane Gagnon |
| Motion No. 380
|
| Mr. Antoine Dubé |
| Motion No. 381
|
| Mr. Benoît Sauvageau |
| Motion No. 382
|
2150
| Mr. Réal Ménard |
| Motion No. 383
|
| Mr. Yves Rocheleau |
| Motions Nos. 384 and 385
|
| Mr. Ghislain Fournier |
| Motion No. 386
|
| Mrs. Pauline Picard |
| Motion No. 387
|
| Mr. Ghislain Fournier |
| Motion No. 388
|
| Motion No. 389
|
| Mr. Benoît Sauvageau |
| Motion No. 390
|
| Mr. Maurice Dumas |
| Motion No. 391
|
| Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien |
| Motion No. 392
|
| Mr. Réal Ménard |
| Motion No. 393
|
| Mr. Gérard Asselin |
| Motion No. 394
|
| Mr. Antoine Dubé |
| Motion No. 395
|
| Mr. Paul Mercier |
| Motion No. 396
|
| Mrs. Christiane Gagnon |
| Motion No. 397
|
| Mr. Serge Cardin |
| Motion No. 398
|
| Mr. Bernard Bigras |
| Motion No. 399
|
2155
| Mr. Richard Marceau |
| Motion No. 400
|
| Mr. Odina Desrochers |
| Motion No. 401
|
| Mr. Yvan Bernier |
| Motion No. 402
|
| Mrs. Christiane Gagnon |
| Motion No. 403
|
| Mr. Ghislain Lebel |
| Motion No. 404
|
| Mr. René Canuel |
| Motion No. 405
|
| Mrs. Pierrette Venne |
| Motion No. 406
|
| Mr. Benoît Sauvageau |
| Motion No. 407
|
2200
| Mr. René Laurin |
| Motions Nos. 408 and 409
|
| Mr. Paul Mercier |
| Motion No. 410
|
| Mr. Peter MacKay |
| Motion No. 411
|
| Division on Motion No. 90 deferred
|
2205
| Division on Motion No. 91 deferred
|
| Division on Motion No. 150 deferred
|
| Division on Motion No. 398 deferred
|
2235
(Division 761)
| Motion No. 1 negatived
|
2240
2245
(Division 762)
| Amendment negatived
|
2255
(Division 763)
| Motion No. 2 negatived
|
2300
(Division 764)
| Motion No. 3 negatived
|
2310
(Division 765)
| Motion No. 4 negatived
|
2320
(Division 766)
| Amendment negatived
|
2325
(Division 767)
| Motion No. 5 negatived
|
2330
(Division 768)
| Motion No. 6 negatived
|
2335
(Division 769)
| Motion No. 7 negatived
|
2345
(Division 770)
| Motion No. 8 negatived
|
2350
(Division 771)
| Amendment negatived
|
2355
(Division 772)
| Motion No. 9 negatived
|
2400
2405
(Division 773)
| Motion No. 10 defeated
|
2410
(Division 774)
| Motion No. 11 negatived
|
2415
(Division 775)
| Motion No. 12 negatived
|
2420
(Division 776)
| Motion No. 13 negatived
|
2425
(Division 777)
| Motion No. 14 negatived
|
2430
(Division 778)
| Motion No. 15 negatived
|
2435
(Division 779)
| Motion No. 18 negatived
|
2440
(Division 780)
| Motion No. 19 negatived
|
2445
(Division 781)
| Motion No. 21 negatived
|
2450
(Division 782)
| Motion No. 22 negatived
|
2455
(Division 783)
| Motion No. 23 negatived
|
2500
(Division 784)
| Motion No. 24 negatived
|
(Division 785)
| Motion No. 26 negatived
|
2505
(Division 786)
| Motion No. 27 negatived
|
2510
(Division 787)
| Motion No. 28 negatived
|
2515
(Division 788)
| Motion No. 29 negatived
|
2520
(Division 789)
| Motion No. 30 negatived
|
2525
(Division 790)
| Motion No. 32 negatived
|
2530
(Division 791)
| Motion No. 33 negatived
|
2535
(Division 792)
| Motion No. 34 negatived
|
2540
2545
(Division 793)
| Motion No. 35 negatived
|
2550
(Division 794)
| Motion No. 36 negatived
|
| Mr. Michel Bellehumeur |
2555
2600
(Division 795)
| Motion No. 37 negatived
|
2605
(Division 796)
| Motion No. 38 negatived
|
2610
(Division 797)
| Motion No. 39 negatived
|
2615
(Division 798)
| Motion No. 40 negatived
|
2620
(Division 799)
| Motion No. 41 negatived
|
2625
(Division 800)
| Motion No. 42 negatived
|
2630
2635
(Division 801)
| Motion No. 43 negatived
|
2640
2645
(Division 802)
| Motion No. 44 negatived
|
2650
(Division 803)
| Motion No. 48 negatived
|
2655
(Division 804)
| Motion No. 50 negatived
|
2700
| Mr. Ghislain Fournier |
(Division 805)
| Motion No. 51 negatived
|
2705
(Division 806)
| Motion No. 52 negatived
|
2710
2715
(Division 807)
| Motion No. 53 negatived
|
(Division 808)
| Motion No. 54 negatived
|
2720
(Division 809)
| Motion No. 55 negatived
|
2725
(Division 810)
| Motion No. 56 negatived
|
2730
(Division 811)
| Motion No. 57 negatived
|
| Mr. Réal Ménard |
2735
(Division 812)
| Motion No. 58 negatived
|
2740
2745
(Division 813)
| Motion No. 59 negatived
|
2750
(Division 814)
| Motion No. 60 negatived
|
2755
(Division 815)
| Motion No. 61 negatived
|
2800
(Division 816)
| Motion No. 62 negatived
|
2805
(Division 817)
| Motion No. 63 negatived
|
2810
(Division 818)
| Motion No. 64 negatived
|
2815
(Division 819)
| Motion No. 65 negatived
|
2820
(Division 820)
| Motion No. 66 negatived
|
2825
(Division 821)
| Motion 67 agreed to
|
2830
(Division 822)
| Motion No. 68 negatived
|
2835
(Division 823)
| Motion No. 69 negatived
|
2840
(Division 824)
| Motion No. 70 negatived
|
2845
(Division 825)
| Motion No. 72 negatived
|
2850
(Division 826)
| Motion No. 73 negatived
|
2855
2900
(Division 827)
| Motion No. 74 negatived
|
2905
(Division 828)
| Motion No. 75 negatived
|
2910
(Division 829)
| Motion No. 76 negatived
|
2915
(Division 830)
| Motion No. 77 negatived
|
2920
(Division 831)
| Motion No. 78 negatived
|
2925
(Division 832)
| Motion No. 79 negatived
|
2930
(Division 833)
| Motion No. 80 agreed to
|
2935
(Division 834)
| Motion No. 81 negatived
|
2940
(Division 835)
| Motion No. 82 negatived
|
2945
(Division 836)
| Motion No. 83 negatived
|
2950
(Division 837)
| Motion No. 85 negatived
|
2955
(Division 838)
| Motion No. 86 negatived
|
3000
(Division 839)
| Motion No. 87 negatived
|
3005
(Division 840)
| Motion No. 88 negatived
|
3010
(Division 841)
| Motion No. 90 negatived
|
3015
(Division 842)
| Motion No. 91 negatived
|
3020
(Division 843)
| Motion No. 92 negatived
|
3025
(Division 844)
| Motion No. 93 negatived
|
3030
(Division 845)
| Motion No. 94 negatived
|
3035
(Division 846)
| Motion No. 95 negatived
|
3040
(Division 847)
| Motion No. 96 negatived
|
3045
(Division 848)
| Motion No. 97 negatived
|
3050
(Division 849)
| Motion No. 98 negatived
|
3055
(Division 850)
| Motion No. 99 negatived
|
3100
(Division 851)
| Motion No. 100 negatived
|
3105
(Division 852)
| Motion No. 101 negatived
|
3110
(Division 853)
| Motion No. 102 negatived
|
3115
(Division 854)
| Motion No. 103 negatived
|
3120
(Division 855)
| Motion No. 104 negatived
|
3125
(Division 856)
| Motion No. 105 negatived
|
3130
(Division 857)
| Motion No. 106 negatived
|
3135
(Division 858)
| Motion No. 107 negatived
|
3140
(Division 859)
| Motion No. 108 negatived
|
3145
(Division 860)
| Motion No. 109 negatived
|
3150
(Division 861)
| Motion No. 110 negatived
|
3155
(Division 862)
| Motion No. 111 negatived
|
3200
(Division 863)
| Motion No. 112 negatived
|
3205
(Division 864)
| Motion No. 113 negatived
|
(Division 865)
| Motion No. 114 negatived
|
3210
(Division 866)
| Motion No. 115 negatived
|
3215
(Division 867)
| Motion No. 116 negatived
|
3220
(Division 868)
| Motion No. 117 negatived
|
3225
(Division 869)
| Motion No. 118 negatived
|
3230
(Division 870)
| Motion No. 119 negatived
|
3235
(Division 871)
| Motion No. 120 negatived
|
3240
(Division 872)
| Motion No. 121 negatived
|
3245
(Division 873)
| Motion No. 122 negatived
|
3250
(Division 874)
| Motion No. 123 negatived
|
3255
(Division 875)
| Motion No. 124 negatived
|
(Division 876)
| Motion No. 125 negatived
|
3300
(Division 877)
| Motion No. 126 negatived
|
3305
(Division 878)
| Motion No. 127 negatived
|
3310
(Division 879)
| Motion No. 128 negatived
|
3315
(Division 880)
| Motion No. 129 negatived
|
3320
(Division 881)
| Motion No. 130 negatived
|
3325
(Division 882)
| Motion No. 131 negatived
|
3330
(Division 883)
| Motion No. 132 negatived
|
3335
(Division 884)
| Motion No. 133 negatived
|
3340
(Division 885)
| Motion No. 134 negatived
|
3345
(Division 886)
| Motion No. 135 negatived
|
3350
(Division 887)
| Motion No. 136 negatived
|
3355
(Division 888)
| Motion No. 137 negatived
|
3400
(Division 889)
| Motion No. 138 negatived
|
3405
(Division 890)
| Motion No. 139 negatived
|
3410
(Division 891)
| Motion No. 140 negatived
|
3415
(Division 892)
| Motion No. 141 negatived
|
3420
(Division 893)
| Motion No. 142 negatived
|
3425
(Division 894)
| Motion No. 143 negatived
|
3430
(Division 895)
| Motion No. 144 negatived
|
3435
(Division 896)
| Motion No. 145 negatived
|
(Division 897)
| Motion No. 146 negatived
|
3445
(Division 898)
| Motion No. 147 negatived
|
3450
(Division 899)
| Motion No. 148 negatived
|
3455
(Division 900)
| Motion No. 149 negatived
|
3500
3505
(Division 901)
| Motion No. 170 negatived
|
3510
(Division 902)
| Motion No. 171 negatived
|
3515
(Division 903)
| Motion No. 173 negatived
|
3520
3525
(Division 904)
| Motion No. 175 negatived
|
3530
(Division 905)
| Motion No. 179 negatived
|
3535
3540
(Division 906)
| Motion No. 182 negatived
|
3545
(Division 907)
| Motion No. 184 negatived
|
3550
(Division 908)
| Motion No. 187 negatived
|
3555
(Division 909)
| Motion No. 191 negatived
|
3600
(Division 910)
| Motion No. 193 negatived
|
3605
(Division 911)
| Motion No. 198 negatived
|
3610
(Division 912)
| Motion No. 199 negatived
|
(Division 913)
| Motion No. 201 negatived
|
3615
(Division 914)
| Motion No. 204 negatived
|
3620
(Division 915)
| Motion No. 211 negatived
|
3625
(Division 916)
| Motion No. 215 negatived
|
3630
(Division 917)
| Motion No. 219 negatived
|
3635
(Division 918)
| Motion No. 222 negatived
|
(Division 919)
| Motion No. 224 negatived
|
(Division 920)
| Motion No. 225 negatived
|
3645
(Division 921)
| Motion No. 227 negatived
|
3650
(Division 922)
| Motion No. 229 negatived
|
3655
(Division 923)
| Motion No. 231 negatived
|
3700
(Division 924)
| Motion No. 234 negatived
|
3705
(Division 925)
| Motion No. 235 negatived
|
3710
(Division 926)
| Motion No. 237 negatived
|
3715
3720
(Division 927)
| Motion No. 238 negatived
|
3725
(Division 928)
| Motion No. 240 negatived
|
3730
(Division 929)
| Motion No. 266 negatived
|
3735
(Division 930)
| Motion No. 269 negatived
|
3740
(Division 931)
| Motion No. 271 negatived
|
3745
(Division 932)
| Motion No. 273 negatived
|
3750
(Division 933)
| Motion No. 275 negatived
|
3755
(Division 934)
| Motion No. 280 negatived
|
(Division 935)
| Motion No. 283 negatived
|
3800
(Division 936)
| Motion No. 285 negatived
|
3805
(Division 937)
| Motion No. 286 negatived
|
3810
3815
(Division 938)
| Motion No. 288 negatived
|
3820
(Division 939)
| Motion No. 289 negatived
|
3825
(Division 940)
| Motion No. 291 negatived
|
3830
(Division 941)
| Motion No. 293 negatived
|
3835
(Division 942)
| Motion No. 295 negatived
|
3840
(Division 943)
| Motion No. 296 negatived
|
3845
(Division 944)
| Motion No. 297 negatived
|
3850
(Division 945)
| Motion No. 298 negatived
|
3855
(Division 946)
| Motion No. 399 negatived
|
3900
(Division 947)
| Motion No. 400 negatived
|
3905
(Division 948)
| Motion No. 401 negatived
|
3910
3915
(Division 949)
| Motion No. 402 negatived
|
3920
(Division 950)
| Motion No. 403 negatived
|
(Division 951)
| Motion No. 404 negatived
|
3925
(Division 952)
| Motion No. 405 negatived
|
3930
3935
(Division 953)
| Motion No. 406 negatived
|
(Division 954)
| Motion No. 407 negatived
|
3940
(Division 955)
| Motion No. 408 negatived
|
3945
(Division 956)
| Motion No. 409 negatived
|
3950
(Division 957)
| Motion No. 410 negatived
|
3955
(Division 958)
| Motion No. 150 negatived
|
4000
(Division 959)
| Motion No. 151 negatived
|
4005
(Division 960)
| Motion No. 152 negatived
|
4010
(Division 961)
| Motion No. 153 negatived
|
4015
(Division 962)
| Motion No. 154 negatived
|
4020
(Division 963)
| Motion No. 155 negatived
|
4025
(Division 964)
| Motion No. 156 negatived
|
(Division 965)
| Motion No. 157 negatived
|
4030
(Division 966)
| Motion No. 158 negatived
|
4035
(Division 967)
| Motion No. 159 negatived
|
4040
(Division 968)
| Motion No. 160 negatived
|
4045
(Division 969)
| Motion .No. 161 negatived
|
(Division 970)
| Motion No. 162 negatived
|
4050
(Division 971)
| Motion No. 163 negatived
|
4055
(Division 972)
| Motion No. 164 negatived
|
4100
(Division 973)
| Motion No. 165 negatived
|
4105
(Division 974)
| Motion No. 166 negatived
|
4110
(Division 975)
| Motion No. 167 negatived
|
4115
(Division 976)
| Motion No. 168 negatived
|
(Division 977)
| Motion No. 169 negatived
|
4120
(Division 978)
| Motion No. 172 negatived
|
4125
(Division 979)
| Motion No. 174 negatived
|
4130
(Division 980)
| Motion No. 176 negatived
|
4135
4140
(Division 981)
| Motion No. 177 negatived
|
4145
(Division 982)
| Motion No. 178 negatived
|
(Division 983)
| Motion No. 180 negatived
|
4150
(Division 984)
| Motion No. 181 negatived
|
4155
(Division 985)
| Motion No. 183 negatived
|
4200
(Division 986)
| Motion No. 185 negatived
|
4205
(Division 987)
| Motion No. 186 negatived
|
(Division 988)
| Motion No. 188 negatived
|
4210
(Division 989)
| Motion No. 189 negatived
|
4215
(Division 990)
| Motion No. 190 negatived
|
4220
(Division 991)
| Motion No. 192 negatived
|
(Division 992)
| Motion No. 194 negatived
|
4225
(Division 993)
| Motion No. 195 negatived
|
4230
(Division 994)
| Motion No. 196 negatived
|
4235
(Division 995)
| Motion No. 197 negatived
|
(Division 996)
| Motion No. 200 negatived
|
4240
(Division 997)
| Motion No. 202 negatived
|
4245
(Division 998)
| Motion No. 203 negatived
|
(Division 999)
| Motion No. 205 negatived
|
4250
(Division 1000)
| Motion No. 206 negatived
|
4255
(Division 1001)
| Motion No. 207 negatived
|
4300
(Division 1002)
| Motion No. 208 negatived
|
(Division 1003)
| Motion No. 209 negatived
|
4305
(Division 1004)
| Motion No. 210 negatived
|
4310
(Division 1005)
| Motion No. 212 negatived
|
(Division 1006)
| Motion No. 213 negatived
|
4315
(Division 1007)
| Motion No. 214 negatived
|
4320
(Division 1008)
| Motion No. 216 negatived
|
4325
(Division 1009)
| Motion No. 217 negatived
|
4330
(Division 1010)
| Motion No. 218 negatived
|
4335
(Division 1011)
| Motion No. 220 negatived
|
4340
(Division 1012)
| Motion No. 221 negatived
|
(Division 1013)
| Motion No. 223 negatived
|
4345
(Division 1014)
| Motion No. 226 negatived
|
4350
(Division 1015)
| Motion No. 228 negatived
|
4355
(Division 1016)
| Motion No. 230 negatived
|
4400
(Division 1017)
| Motion No. 232 negatived
|
4405
(Division 1018)
| Motion No. 233 negatived
|
4410
(Division 1019)
| Motion No. 236 negatived
|
4415
(Division 1020)
| Motion No. 239 negatived
|
(Division 1021)
| Motion No. 241 negatived
|
4420
(Division 1022)
| Motion No. 242 negatived
|
4425
(Division 1023)
| Motion No. 243 negatived
|
4430
(Division 1024)
| Motion No. 244 negatived
|
4435
(Division 1025)
| Motion No. 245 negatived
|
4440
(Division 1026)
| Motion No. 246 negatived
|
4445
(Division 1027)
| Motion No. 247 negatived
|
4450
(Division 1028)
| Motion No. 248 negatived
|
(Division 1029)
| Motion No. 249 negatived
|
4455
(Division 1030)
| Motion No. 250 negatived
|
4500
(Division 1031)
| Motion No. 252 negatived
|
4505
(Division 1032)
| Motion No. 253 negatived
|
4510
(Division 1033)
| Motion No. 254 negatived
|
4515
(Division 1034)
| Motion No. 255 negatived
|
(Division 1035)
| Motion No. 256 negatived
|
4520
(Division 1036)
| Motion No. 257 negatived
|
4525
(Division 1037)
| Motion No. 258 negatived
|
4530
(Division 1038)
| Motion No. 259 negatived
|
4535
(Division 1039)
| Motion No. 260 negatived
|
4540
(Division 1040)
| Motion No. 261 negatived
|
(Division 1041)
| Motion No. 262 negatived
|
4545
(Division 1042)
| Motion No. 263 negatived
|
4550
(Division 1043)
| Motion No. 264 negatived
|
4555
(Division 1044)
| Motion No. 265 negatived
|
(Division 1045)
| Motion No. 267 negatived
|
4600
(Division 1046)
| Motion No. 268 negatived
|
(Division 1047)
| Motion No. 270 negatived
|
4605
(Division 1048)
| Motion No. 272 negatived
|
4610
(Division 1049)
| Motion No. 274 negatived.
|
4615
(Division 1050)
| Motion No. 276 negatived
|
(Division 1051)
| Motion No. 277 negatived
|
4620
(Division 1052)
| Motion No. 278 negatived
|
4625
(Division 1053)
| Motion No. 281 negatived
|
4630
(Division 1054)
| Motion No. 282 negatived
|
(Division 1055)
| Motion No. 284 negatived
|
4635
(Division 1056)
| Motion No. 287 negatived
|
4640
(Division 1057)
| Motion No. 290 negatived
|
4645
(Division 1058)
| Motion No. 292 negatived
|
4650
(Division 1059)
| Motion 294 negatived
|
4655
(Division 1060)
| Motion No. 299 negatived
|
(Division 1061)
| Motion No. 300 negatived
|
4700
(Division 1062)
| Motion No. 301 negatived
|
4705
(Division 1063)
| Motion No. 302 negatived
|
4710
(Division 1064)
| Motion No. 303 negatived
|
4715
(Division 1065)
| Motion No. 304 negatived
|
(Division 1066)
| Motion No. 305 negatived
|
4720
(Division 1067)
| Motion No. 306 negatived
|
4725
(Division 1068)
| Motion No. 307 negatived
|
4730
(Division 1069)
| Motion No. 308 negatived
|
(Division 1070)
| Motion No. 309 negatived
|
4735
(Division 1071)
| Motion No. 310 negatived.
|
4740
(Division 1072)
| Motion No. 311 negatived
|
4745
(Division 1073)
| Motion No. 312 negatived
|
4750
(Division 1074)
| Motion No. 313 negatived
|
4755
(Division 1075)
| Motion No. 314 negatived
|
(Division 1076)
| Motion No. 315 negatived
|
4800
(Division 1077)
| Motion No. 316 negatived
|
4805
(Division 1078)
| Motion No. 317 negatived
|
4810
(Division 1079)
| Motion No. 318 negatived
|
4815
(Division 1080)
| Motion No. 319 negatived
|
(Division 1081)
| Motion No. 320 negatived
|
4820
(Division 1082)
| Motion No. 321 negatived
|
4825
(Division 1083)
| Motion No. 322 negatived.
|
4830
(Division 1084)
| Motion No. 323 negatived
|
4835
(Division 1085)
| Motion No. 324 negatived
|
4840
(Division 1086)
| Motion No. 325 negatived
|
4845
(Division 1087)
| Motion No. 326 negatived
|
(Division 1088)
| Motion No. 327 negatived
|
4850
(Division 1089)
| Motion No. 328 negatived
|
4855
(Division 1090)
| Motion No. 329 negatived
|
(Division 1091)
| Motion No. 330 negatived
|
4900
(Division 1092)
| Motion No. 331 negatived
|
4905
(Division 1093)
| Motion No. 332 negatived
|
(Division 1094)
| Motion No. 333 negatived
|
4910
(Division 1095)
| Motion No. 334 negatived
|
4915
(Division 1096)
| Motion No. 335 negatived
|
4920
(Division 1097)
| Motion No. 336 negatived
|
4925
(Division 1098)
| Motion No. 337 negatived
|
(Division 1099)
| Motion No. 338 negatived
|
4930
(Division 1100)
| Motion No. 339 negatived
|
4935
(Division 1101)
| Motion No. 340 negatived
|
4940
(Division 1102)
| Motion No. 341 negatived
|
4945
(Division 1103)
| Motion No. 342 negatived
|
4950
(Division 1104)
| Motion No. 343 negatived
|
4955
(Division 1105)
| Motion No. 344 negatived
|
(Division 1106)
| Motion No. 345 negatived
|
5000
(Division 1107)
| Motion No. 346 negatived
|
5005
(Division 1108)
| Motion No. 347 negatived
|
(Division 1109)
| Motion No. 348 negatived
|
5010
(Division 1110)
| Motion No. 349 negatived
|
5015
(Division 1111)
| Motion No. 350 negatived
|
(Division 1112)
| Motion No. 351 negatived
|
5020
(Division 1113)
| Motion No. 352 negatived
|
(Division 1114)
| Motion No. 353 negatived
|
5025
(Division 1115)
| Motion No. 354 negatived
|
5030
(Division 1116)
| Motion No. 355 negatived
|
(Division 1117)
| Motion No. 356 negatived
|
5035
(Division 1118)
| Motion No. 357 negatived
|
5040
(Division 1119)
| Motion No. 358 negatived
|
5045
(Division 1120)
| Motion No. 359 negatived
|
5050
(Division 1121)
| Motion No. 360 negatived
|
5055
(Division 1122)
| Motion No. 361 negatived
|
5100
(Division 1123)
| Motion No. 362 negatived
|
5105
(Division 1124)
| Motion No. 363 negatived
|
5110
(Division 1125)
| Motion No. 364 negatived
|
5115
(Division 1126)
| Motion No. 365 negatived.
|
(Division 1127)
| Motion No. 366 negatived.
|
5120
(Division 1128)
| Motion No. 367 negatived
|
5125
(Division 1129)
| Motion No. 368 negatived
|
5130
(Division 1130)
| Motion No. 369 negatived
|
5135
(Division 1131)
| Motion No. 370 negatived
|
5140
(Division 1132)
| Motion No. 371 negatived
|
5145
(Division 1133)
| Motion No. 372 negatived
|
5150
(Division 1134)
| Motion No. 373 negatived
|
5155
(Division 1135)
| Motion No. 374 negatived
|
5200
(Division 1136)
| Motion No. 375 negatived
|
(Division 1137)
| Motion No. 376 negatived
|
5205
(Division 1138)
| Motion No. 377 negatived
|
5210
(Division 1139)
| Motion No. 378 negatived
|
5215
(Division 1140)
| Motion No. 379 negatived
|
5220
(Division 1141)
| Motion No. 380 negatived
|
5225
(Division 1142)
| Motion No. 381 negatived
|
5230
(Division 1143)
| Motion No. 382 negatived
|
(Division 1144)
| Motion No. 383 negatived
|
5235
5240
(Division 1145)
| Motion No. 384 negatived
|
5245
(Division 1146)
| Motion No. 385 negatived
|
5250
(Division 1147)
| Motion No. 386 negatived
|
(Division 1148)
| Motion No. 387 negatived
|
5255
(Division 1149)
| Motion No. 388 negatived
|
5300
5305
(Division 1150)
| Motion No. 389 negatived
|
5310
(Division 1151)
| Motion No. 390 negatived
|
5315
(Division 1152)
| Motion No. 391 negatived
|
5320
(Division 1153)
| Motion No. 392 negatived
|
5325
(Division 1154)
| Motion No. 393 negatived
|
5330
(Division 1155)
| Motion No. 394 negatived
|
5335
(Division 1156)
| Motion No. 395 negatived
|
5340
(Division 1157)
| Motion No. 396 negatived
|
5345
(Division 1158)
| Motion No. 397 negatived
|
5355
(Division 1159)
| Motion No. 398 negatived
|
| Motion for concurrence
|
| Hon. Stéphane Dion |
5405
(Division 1160)
(Official Version)
EDITED HANSARD • NUMBER 63
HOUSE OF COMMONS
Monday, March 13, 2000
The House met at 11 a.m.
Prayers
PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS
1105
[English]
WESTRAY MINE
The House resumed from March 3 consideration of the motion.
Mr. Bill Casey (Cumberland—Colchester, PC): Madam
Speaker, it is certainly a pleasure for me to talk about this
issue which stems from an awful disaster that happened in 1992 in
Nova Scotia not too far from my riding. I remember it well. I was
the member of parliament for Cumberland—Colchester at the time.
I represent an area that has a large number of coal mines and we
have seen our share of coal mine disasters in Springhill, River
Hebert, Joggins and all those places that thrived on coal in the
early years. This motion is very dear to my heart.
The father of the hon. member for
Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough who initiated this motion was the
member of parliament for that area. I remember going to the
scene of the disaster and the Hon. Elmer MacKay was there
virtually 24 hours a day until it was determined that there was
no more hope for the 26 miners lost. He worked with the people
hand in hand and was always present to help them.
I want to congratulate my colleague from
Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough for working so hard to ensure
that workplace safety is a top priority of the Government of
Canada as well as the business community.
We will be voting on this motion. It will be interesting to see
which members are in favour of amending the criminal code to
protect workers in Canada from coast to coast. I am confident
this motion will gain the support of the entire House or at least
one would certainly hope so considering the ramifications.
This morning on the airplane coming to Ottawa I happened to open
the Globe and Mail and there was a story that reminded me
of the Westray incident. The article stated: “Ashen-faced
relatives stood in silence watching rescuers coated in coal dust
drag up the bodies of the people killed in the Ukrainian mine
disaster”. That just happened hours ago and it sounds exactly
like what happened in Westray. The draegermen were bringing up
the bodies. It was such a sad thing and to think it could have
been avoided.
I would like to take a moment this morning to read the motion.
It is important that we remember what we are talking about. I
will read the motion into the record so that everybody is clear
about what we are dealing with. Motion No. 79 states:
That, in the opinion of this House, the Criminal Code or other
appropriate federal statutes should be amended in accordance with
Recommendation 73 of the Province of Nova Scotia's Public Inquiry
into the Westray disaster, specifically with the goal of ensuring
that corporate executives and directors are held properly
accountable for workplace safety.
What could make more sense than that? The awful thing is that
the study to which the hon. member refers was started in 1992 and
was just tabled in 1997. His motion stems from that study.
The need for a rational standard of business behaviour goes
without saying. However it is every bit as important that once
the laws are established, provisions are created to ensure that
bureaucrats do not tokenize the enforcement of those laws. There
can be no double standards.
Enforcement administrators often give way to political
influences that persuade them that enforcement of workplace
legislation will sacrifice jobs and scare away industry.
Enforcement apathy is often rationalized by the political
suggestion that by giving a company the right amount of time the
problem will be fixed. This is often proven blatantly untrue.
Those people who have been persuaded that jobs and votes are
higher priorities than life enter into a clear conflict of
interest and it must stop. Many well-intentioned business
executives agree with this motion because it provides safety
legislation in the workplace. However there are still some who
do not. Sadly the benefits of their behaviours accrue only to
those executives and those people involved, while the workers,
their families and ultimately the Canadian taxpayer pay for their
gain. In fact current tax credit laws favour non-compliant
employers.
1110
Collectively workers represent the wealthiest group of people
and consumers in the country. It is from these workers that
taxes are collected which in turn fund the infrastructure which
stimulates an environment that creates additional wealth, so long
as the workers and employees remain healthy.
When injured, taxpayers often pay the financial costs of
rehabilitation, death benefits, retraining and lost productivity
that exceeds $16 billion annually. Every day through their
efforts Canadian workers earn the right to be protected with
enforceable legislation.
As an investment it is good business and cost justified to
protect Canadian employees. A small number of executives still
escape liability because their lawyers show them how to hide
behind jurisdictional boundaries. Even if convicted of violating
the occupational health and safety statutes, existing provincial
penalties are minimal compared to the rewards generated by their
violation. This motion would require total accountability of
executives with no loopholes.
Unfortunately we have seen many examples of occupational safety
in the workplace taking second spot behind the bottom line,
especially in the mining industry where the very nature of the
work involves a great deal of risk. It is the duty of company
officers to ensure the work is done in the safest possible
conditions.
I again refer to the newspaper article about the Ukrainian
explosion which so mirrors the Westray explosion. The article
said “a preliminary investigation suggested that Saturday's
accident was a methane explosion caused by a violation of safety
standards”. That is exactly what happened at Westray.
Ukraine's energy minister also said that safety violations were
likely at fault. The miners usually blame accidents on the
unwillingness of officials to spend money on maintaining or
upgrading safety equipment. History certainly has repeated
itself there.
Often corporate executives sometimes seem less interested in the
merits of workplace safety in pursuit of the bottom line. This
is a very dangerous scenario. We must be mindful of it and do
everything we can to prevent it.
In the case of the Westray tragedy, labour safety standards, in
particular minimal safety standards, were not adhered to to the
extent they should have been, much like we have read about
regarding the Ukrainian explosion.
Looking at this issue in the larger context, there must also be
recognition of the role of government to ensure proper standards
are met, not only set but met. It stands to reason that when
weighing business goals versus those of safety, sometimes
businesses find themselves pulled in many ways. They have to
meet production deadlines, outperform competitors, increase
bottom lines, et cetera. That is where the human element and the
safety issue must be exercised.
Far too often businesses and indeed heads of corporations are
obsessed with financial gain leaving the safety of their workers
neglected. That type of short term gain often results in long
term pain, as was the case at Westray.
One thing that really struck me was the name of the study. The
report that was done on the Westray mine disaster was entitled
“A Predictable Path to Disaster”. That is a sad commentary on
safety in the mining industry and the executives involved in that
industry. A predictable path; they could have predicted that the
disaster was going to happen, yet it still did.
Safety regulations, management and government all failed in
their duties to those miners. Tough economic times which exist
in the country put further pressure on workers. That is why this
is so timely. The economic impact of having to shut down a
corporation affects everyone in that company. The employees,
management, board of directors and anyone associated with that
business are going to feel a negative impact if there has to be
an operational shutdown as a result of a potential breach of
safety.
That is the cost of doing business and we have to do everything
to ensure that those safety practices are followed. In the case
of Westray they were almost trivial things which were overlooked:
sensors shut down, alarms disconnected, comments from the miners
disregarded, and things like that.
Companies must ensure the avoidance of hazardous or illegal
practices such as those which cannot be condoned in any capacity.
If companies have not already done so, they should do everything
within their power to implement safe and ethical work practices.
Ethics such as these should be studied and followed everywhere in
places of employment, especially in upper management. If this is
not the case, action must be taken to demonstrate the importance
and seriousness of the issue. Business executives must promote
and nurture safe work ethics and have an open and approachable
attitude toward all employees.
As Nova Scotia experienced with the Westray disaster, senior
bureaucrats within the provincial workplace and enforcement
agencies became compromised by regional politics and vested
interests.
This practice is suspected to be occurring in other provinces
even today, almost eight years after that explosion.
1115
I want to wind up my comments by saying that I hope the whole
House will look at this bill for what it is. It is a motion to
protect workers in a very unsafe situation. It addresses a
terrible safety record. It is time now that we in the House pull
together and do something to address those issues.
Ms. Alexa McDonough (Halifax, NDP): Madam Speaker, I am
very pleased to have the opportunity to address this motion. For
me, one of the most profound and distressing events that occurred
in Nova Scotia during my 14 years of serving as leader of the New
Democratic Party in that province was the Westray disaster, which
absolutely avoidably and unnecessarily cost 26 miners their lives
and cost their families the loss of loved ones.
I have always taken seriously the request that was made to me by
some of the widows of those Westray miners that I, along with
every other elected politician in office, pledge to ensure that
the fathers of the children of those Westray miners would not
have lost their lives in vain because we would move to put in
place the necessary legislation, the necessary protection, to
ensure that no such disaster could ever occur again in Nova
Scotia or anywhere in the country, and this is the subject of the
motion that is before us.
I am torn by conflicting emotions as we discuss this motion. On
the one hand I am filled with hope, and I think many Canadian
workers will be, that health and safety is the subject of debate
in the House. That is a very important thing and I want to
commend the member for Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough for
bringing forward this motion and other members of the House who
have risen to support the motion that is before us. The needless
loss of 26 miners still buried beneath the ground has not been
forgotten, and that is a very important message.
As the previous member who spoke indicated, one cannot be
unmindful of the chilling news of the death of 80 miners in
Ukraine which has occurred in the last few days. Let us not be
so smug in the House as to think that the same kind of unsafe
conditions, the same kind of neglect by employers and governments
cannot repeat itself in Canada. Until we take serious
legislative measures to put in place the protections that are
necessary, including an enactment in legislation of the sentiment
of this motion, this situation can and indeed will occur again.
The disappointing thing at this point in the debate about this
very important health and safety topic is that it would appear
that it is the intention of the federal Liberal government to
never really put this debate into action. The intention of the
government is not only to try to forget the lost lives at
Westray, but to ignore the simple, horrifying reality across the
country that there are workers who continue to be put into unsafe
working conditions and the people who put them there remain
immune from criminal responsibility.
There will be, no doubt, Liberal members of parliament who will
stand in protest and they too will proclaim their concern, their
care about Canadian workers, how they hope a disaster like
Westray will never again happen. However, until we enact
legislation that embodies the spirit of this motion, then such
speeches will be little more than empty rhetoric.
Motion No. 79 is just that, it is a motion. It has no
legislative implications. Indeed we have seen in the past that
this government will from time to time support such motions, only
to ignore the issue in its entirety when it comes to enacting
legislation to express the intent of the motion.
However, in this case the government will not be allowed to fool
the Canadian people so easily because it is our responsibility to
ensure that the government is forced to act upon this.
1120
At issue in this motion is recommendation No. 73 of the
exhaustive Westray report. That recommendation would establish
criminal responsibility for decision makers who knowingly put
their workers at undue risk. It is the basis for this motion and
the basis for my private member's Bill C-259.
Supporting the motion which is before us would tell Canadian
workers that their representatives will stand for them.
Supporting Bill C-259 would show Canadian workers that their
representatives will stand for them. Unfortunately, the
government appears determined to send a very different message.
I bring to the attention of the House where the Liberal
government stands today on workplace safety. I will quote from
letters written by members of the government in response to my
requests for support for Bill C-259. What did the Minister of
Labour say? She said that it falls under the jurisdiction of the
justice department. The translation of her statement is that
worker safety is not the labour minister's problem.
What about the Minister of Justice? She said:
I share your concern that people in Canada should not be able to
hold themselves above the law...my officials are giving this
recommendation every consideration.
The translation of that statement is “We have had three years
to do something about this, but don't hold your breath”.
I think the clincher comes from the Prime Minister's office:
I share your concerns about the Westray Mine explosion...that is
why the government has a comprehensive range of programs to
promote workplace safety.
The translation of that statement is “Despite everything that
the Westray inquiry documented, despite the recommendations
coming out of the Westray inquiry, despite the fact that workers
continue to be put in unsafe working conditions, there is no real
problem. The existing regime does the job”.
If the existing regime did the job, then there would not have
been 26 miners' lives lost in the Westray explosion.
I plead with members of the House to recognize that this is not
a partisan issue. We all know that every member elected to the
House of Commons has constituents who, at this very moment, as we
speak about the motion which is before us, are working in unsafe
conditions, who are forced to work in unsafe conditions because
of the inadequacy of the legislation that exists in the country.
Whether to stand for those working Canadians is not a choice.
Standing for those Canadians working in unsafe health and safety
conditions is our obligation and I urge every member of the House
to vote in support of the motion which is before us.
Mr. Scott Brison (Kings—Hants, PC): Madam Speaker, it is
a pleasure to rise to speak to Motion No. 79. I commend the hon.
member for Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough for his commitment to
this issue and his foresight in introducing this motion in the
House of Commons for debate.
It is unfortunate that an issue of this importance—the issue of
accountability for corporate executives and occupational
safety—is not taken more seriously by the government. It is
very frustrating for individual members of the House to pursue
public policy issues with such vigour, initiative and vision on
behalf of Canadians when they are continually shut down by the
government. Instead of focusing on the types of important public
policy initiatives that Canadians need into the next century, it
is only focused on next week's polls.
1125
The Westray disaster of May 9, 1992 continues to resonate as a
beacon of what should be done to improve worker safety, not just
in Canada but around the world.
Earlier today I heard the hon. member for Cumberland—Colchester
speak of the recent mine disaster in Ukraine. Canada can play a
role in introducing changes to our criminal code that would be
world leading in terms of their impact on occupational health and
safety issues and corporate accountability, not just in Canada
but around the world.
I remember the time of the disaster in 1992. I was on business
in New York when I heard the news. It was one of the few times I
listened to national public radio in New York. I was running in
Central Park when I heard the news. It was one of the few times
that I ever heard about Nova Scotia in the U.S. national media.
It was a sad moment because, of all the positive things that we
understand about Nova Scotia and Canada, it is often this kind of
disaster that captures the U.S. media. The sadness continues to
affect those families, whose lives have been forever changed by
the disaster.
I am not surprised that the government is opposed to improving
corporate accountability on occupational health and safety
issues. This is the same government that ignores issues of
accountability even for its cabinet ministers. One of the
fundamental tenets of our democratic system and of parliamentary
democracy is the accountability of ministers of the crown. The
government ignores even the accountability of ministers in its
own cabinet. For example, the debacle with the HRDC minister has
focused the attention of Canadians on issues of waste in
government in recent weeks. I guess it is consistent with this
government that it continues to ignore issues of accountability,
whether it is corporate accountability in the case of Motion No.
79 or ministerial accountability in terms of the government's
malaise in effecting positive change with respect to the
accountability of its own ministers.
The chilling message that came from the Westray disaster was
that even today, in this day and age, occupational health and
safety issues continually are ignored by companies, particularly,
it would seem, in the coal mining industry, but in other sectors
as well.
Increasingly executives are compensated based on stock options.
While that can be very positive in terms of creating a
synergistic relationship between the goals of the executive from
a compensatory perspective and the goals of the shareholders by
encouraging executives to maximize shareholder value, it can also
focus the efforts of executives on very short term results which
can often have a negative impact on the long term results of a
company, whether it is corporate and financial, or in this case
the safety of workers.
We cannot put a price on life. It is impossible to value human
life on a balance sheet or on an earnings statement. Often
companies are so focused on the bottom line that they forget the
basics of humanity in terms of providing a safe work space for
workers who, every day of their lives in the coal mining
industry, in this case, risk their lives.
Government needs to provide a role in overseeing and ensuring
that on an ongoing basis these workers are protected by changing
the criminal code as recommended by the Westray inquiry. With
this legislation we would ensure that government continue to play
the very important role that only government can play to ensure
that the corporate sector does its part to ensure the safety of
workers in what is a very dangerous industry.
1130
Part of the issue as well is temptation. Far too often in areas
like Atlantic Canada that have seen significant economic issues
and a downturn over the last 30 years, in the haste to attract
and to maintain industry there is a tendency to turn a blind eye
to some of the health and safety issues. That very short term
focus is going to have some very negative long term results.
The Government of Canada can play a proactive role in the same
light that the member for Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough is
playing a proactive visionary role in introducing this motion.
The government can play a proactive visionary role in actually
supporting legislation to ensure that there are not different
sets of health and safety standards for different regions of the
country. Just because a region has some economic downturn
issues, the workers in that region should not have to suffer with
poorer occupational health standards.
The legislation proposed in the motion would effect change in
the criminal code which would actually ensure that across Canada
corporate executives faced the same stringent level of
accountability. Atlantic Canada would see, whether it is in the
coal mining industry or another industry, a greater level of
protection for workers. They go to work every day and struggle
to make ends meet, to try to build a better future for
themselves, for their families and for Canada. They should not
have to live under the pall of a daily unnecessary threat to
their lives and their safety because of corporate negligence.
I encourage all members of the House to support Motion No. 79.
I commend the member for Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough for
proposing very sound legislation in the motion. We need to
ensure that occupational health and safety issues are dealt with
in the same way that environmental issues are dealt with strongly
by the criminal code.
Corporate executives must be responsible not just to their
shareholders but to Canadians at large, to the workers who toil
in the mines, to the wildlife that depend on a clean environment.
We need to ensure that environmental standards, health and safety
and occupational health issues are dealt with appropriately.
The only way to deal with these issues in the economically
driven and globally competitive society we live in today is
through strong changes to the criminal code to ensure that all
workers are safe in their workplace. All corporate executives
must do everything they can to ensure that Canada has the highest
standards in occupational health and safety in the world.
Mr. Lee Morrison (Cypress Hills—Grasslands, Ref.): Madam
Speaker, it was not my intention to speak to the motion. However
because the previous three members who spoke have more or less
moved away from the generalities of the motion and directed their
attention solely to the Westray disaster, I would like to make a
contribution. I am a mining engineer by profession and I have
worked many years underground in many parts of the world. I would
like to give the House my particular take on this disaster.
The last member who spoke made specific reference to the
negligence of the regulatory system. He did not use those words
but I will use them. I believe that the heart of the problem at
Westray was that there was such enormous political pressure to
open this mine in the first place, when there was good advice
from mining experts that it was not a viable operation, that the
shaft should never have been sunk, that they had had methane
problems in that area historically every time they tried to mine
there.
There was definitely a recommendation that the mine not be
developed. However, because of provincial and federal pressures
and the huge amounts of government money put forward to get this
thing going, there was also pressure on the regulatory system. As
I understand it, and I stand to be corrected, I believe the mine
inspector was under considerable pressure not to shut that
operation down.
1135
When I was working in the mines, I never ever encountered a
situation where line management was anything but safety
conscious. Line managers would do whatever was necessary to keep
a mine safe. They had the advantage of having the mine
inspectors behind them. In other words, even if management in
Toronto said they had to get production up, line management could
still do whatever was necessary to keep the mine safe. They had
the full weight and force of the mine inspector behind them
because the mine inspector could shut them down. They had that
power.
We are perhaps shooting at the wrong target here. The problem
at Westray was not governance. The problem at Westray was safety
enforcement. Perhaps we might say that line management was
guilty but the mine inspection system failed. Any mine inspector
should have been able to spot the violations which have been
described here which took place in that mine.
Because there was this one particular disaster, let us not talk
about revamping a law which has served us well over the years.
That is the law which exempts directors. I am not talking about
executives or line management; I am talking about directors. Who
in the devil would want to be the director of a company if he or
she was going to be held responsible for things that are
happening out in the field? The directors do not make managerial
decisions. They have nothing to do with it.
A man would have to be insane to accept a directorial position
for which he is paid a very small amount of money with most
companies. There are directors of multinational companies who
are well paid, but the directors of most companies work for an
honorarium. They get paid so much a meeting and that is it. Who
would take on a position like that? Not me, not if I were going
to be held responsible for something that happened 2,000 or 3,000
miles away that I did not know anything about and had no input
into.
The problem here is government, government, government. The
government failed. The civil servants failed. A group of miners
was unnecessarily killed because the inspection system did not
work. The inspection system did not do its job. We rely on
regulators in industry in this country to keep everyone honest
and they did not do it.
[Translation]
Mr. Michel Bellehumeur (Berthier—Montcalm, BQ): Madam Speaker,
first of all, I wish to congratulate the hon. member sponsoring
this motion for his tenacity, since I recall this motion being
discussed in a previous session. He has now been faithful to
himself and introduced it again, in light of the seriousness of
the issue it raises.
A mine explosion in Nova Scotia raised the question of whether
the legislation was or was not equal to the task of properly
handling a similar situation. The government of the province
mandated Justice Peter Richard to carry out a public inquiry in
order to cast light on all of the circumstances surrounding this
tragedy.
1140
An extremely sizeable report, released in November 1997,
provided a chronology of all of the events and a highly detailed
analysis of the legislation. The judge primarily addressed
provincial labour law, however, in keeping with the Nova Scotia
ministerial order.
Hon. members will realize we will set aside that part of the
report that addresses provincial legislation, because this is
the federal level and we do not want to do what the federal
government is generating complaints for doing, namely meddling
in jurisdictions which are not ours.
The judge did make some comments on the Criminal Code and call
for certain things.
We should perhaps act on his observations in view of what he
asked and show how seriously we take the report.
I repeat this, because I think it important: we support the
motion of the Conservative member, but we would like it to be
examined in the light of federal legislation. In order for this
to occur, the motion has to be referred to the Standing
Committee on Justice and Human Rights for consideration.
With what I heard today, members will understand, there is
nothing much left for me to say, except to move an amendment to
Motion M-79.
I move:
That the motion be amended by adding the following between the
words “amended” and “in accordance”: “following study by the
Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights”.
Once this study is complete, federal legislation may be really
focused accordingly and in appropriate response to the judge in
the matter.
I will quote what the judge said in this regard and more
precisely recommendation 73 of the report, which the
Conservative member's motion refers to. Recommendation 73 of
the Richard report reads as follows:
The Government of Canada, through the Department of Justice,
should institute a study of the accountability of corporate
executives and directors for the wrongful or negligent acts of
the corporation and should introduce in the Parliament of Canada
such amendments to legislation as are necessary to ensure that
corporate executives and directors are held properly accountable
for workplace safety.
This recommendation gives us the opening I mentioned earlier to
intervene in this matter and especially to do a detailed study
of all aspects of mining safety. I therefore move this amendment.
[English]
Mr. Peter MacKay: Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of
order. Prior to the expiry of private members' hour I wish to
advise the Chair that following consultations with my colleagues
from all parties, I believe you will find there is unanimous
consent to defer the vote on Motion No. 79 until Tuesday, March
21, 2000 at the end of government orders.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): Is there unanimous
consent of the House to proceed in such a manner?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
1145
Mr. Peter Stoffer (Sackville—Musquodoboit Valley—Eastern
Shore, NDP): Madam Speaker, it gives me great pleasure to
rise in the House as a member from Nova Scotia to discuss the
merits of Motion No. 79 put forward by the hon. member for
Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough, one of my neighbouring ridings.
I want to thank the hon. member for bringing the motion to
debate in the House of Commons. I believe that health and safety
is something that should be debated in the House of Commons on a
regular basis.
On behalf of the New Democratic Party, and on behalf of workers
across the country, I would like to offer a solemn prayer and
hope in our hearts for the wives and children of the 80 miners
who were recently killed in a blast in Ukraine. I believe I
speak on behalf of all members of the House of Commons in sending
our sincere condolences to everyone in Ukraine.
This motion works in conjunction with Bill C-259, a private
member's bill which the hon. member for Halifax, the leader of
the New Democratic Party, introduced concerning workers' health
and safety rights and bringing those who are criminally
responsible to justice.
What happened at Westray did not have to happen. Miners and
their families are very concerned about their loved ones who go
underground on a daily basis to earn their bread, and to pay
their taxes so that we in the House of Commons can put forth
legislation to protect them. For us to ignore their demands and
wishes is a dereliction of our responsibilities and our duties.
We simply cannot allow this to happen any longer.
There was an exhaustive Westray report which made some very
serious and admirable recommendations, but that report is now
three years old. What has the government done? Absolutely
nothing. I wonder if it is waiting for the next mine disaster
before doing something. Is it waiting for an election to be
called before it enacts legislation? It seems that is the only
thing that will make the federal Liberals move.
After a balanced and exhaustive report which was done to improve
the lives and the health and safety of workers in the
communities, especially in the extremities of the country outside
Ottawa, the government sits on the report and does absolutely
nothing.
Our party was founded on the principles of workers' safety and
workers' rights. We started in the CCF, with J. S. Woodsworth,
right up to the NDP led by the hon. member for Halifax. We have
been fighting day in and day out with our provincial counterparts
and our friends in the labour movement, with the CLC, to fight
for and protect workers' rights throughout the country.
On average, three workers lose their lives on a daily basis.
Three workers is three workers too many.
When I was growing up in Vancouver, 15 workers lost their lives
working on the Portmann Bridge.
On behalf of all Nova Scotians and working people throughout the
country, I encourage all political parties, especially those in
government, to take heed of this very special motion, as well as
the bill of my leader, Bill C-259, to take very seriously the
recommendations for workers' rights and safety and to ignore the
concerns of people like Clifford Frame and Peggy Whitte who have
absolutely no moral leadership in the country, who want to
extract wealth at the cheapest price possible, including that of
labour, and who leave the country when a disaster happens. There
was absolutely no moral leadership, and for any government to
support those two people over workers' rights is absolutely
disastrous and scandalous.
I encourage the entire House to support Motion No. 79 put
forward by my hon. colleague from
Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough.
[Translation]
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): The amendment moved by the
hon. member for Berthier—Montcalm is in order.
1150
[English]
It being 11.50 a.m., the time provided for debate has expired.
Accordingly, the question is on the amendment. Is it the
pleasure of the House to adopt the amendment?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the amendment will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): Pursuant to order
made earlier this day, the recorded division stands deferred
until Tuesday, March 21, at the end of the time provided for
Government Orders.
The Speaker: Before I hear a point of order from the hon.
parliamentary secretary, I would inform the House that I have
received two letters this morning.
[Translation]
I received a letter from the hon. member for
Verchères—Les-Patriotes, chief whip of the Bloc Quebecois, and
another from the hon. member for Rimouski—Mitis, deputy leader of
the Bloc Quebecois.
These letters have to do with the question of privilege raised
earlier by the hon. member for Rimouski—Mitis.
If these are new questions of privilege, I will hear them.
If this is about the question of privilege that was raised
earlier by the hon. member, I will hear members on new facts
surrounding that question, since I am now in the process of
preparing the ruling regarding this question of privilege.
I am told also that another letter was sent by the Bloc
Quebecois leader regarding this issue and I am sure that the
hon. Bloc Quebecois leader also wants to address this issue.
If there are new facts, I will hear them.
* * *
PRIVILEGE
AMENDMENTS TO BILL C-20
Mrs. Suzanne Tremblay (Rimouski—Mitis, BQ): Mr. Speaker, it is
extremely important that I raise this question of privilege
regarding what I told you about on March 1, and regarding the
point of order raised by the hon. member for
Beauharnois—Salaberry, on Friday, March 3.
1155
At the time, I asked you to examine a serious violation of the
privileges as parliamentarians of Bloc Quebecois members in this
House.
I gave you proof that the deputy principal clerk had rejected
amendments that we had not even tabled with the Journals Branch,
since he based his decision on the legislative counsel's data
bank, rather than on the amendments actually tabled by the Bloc
Quebecois.
I demonstrated to you that the freedom of speech of the members
of my party and their right to confidential dealings with the
legislative counsel had been violated.
Not only had the House staff usurped the right of the Bloc MPs
to select the amendments they intended to propose, but it also
committed a breach of confidentiality by consulting the body of
amendments the Bloc Quebecois had had the legislative counsel
prepare.
At the time I raised this question of privilege, I expressed
serious misgivings about the decision making process surrounding
the receivability of the amendments at the report stage. In
fact, certain amendments that were declared out of order were
amended in accordance with the comments by the Deputy Principal
Clerk in order to render them in order. Yet they were again
deemed to be out of order.
This new decision was then made the object of a point of order
by my colleague for Beauharnois—Salaberry who expressed, on
behalf of his colleagues, his dismay about this new refusal by
your staff.
These events, which occurred during the week prior to last
week's parliamentary recess, have a negative effect on the
debate at report stage on Bill C-20, which was begun on Friday,
March 3 and is scheduled to resume today.
Some amendments will be neither debated nor voted on, while we
have serious reservations about the grounds on which the staff
based the decision that they were not in order. The very
process by which amendments were selected might be questioned,
as it seems to be tainted by a number of defects and
irregularities.
On these grounds, Mr. Speaker, you have a duty to bring down your
decision on my point of privilege of March 1 last, and on the
point of order raised by my colleague for Beauharnois—Salaberry,
and to do so before resuming the debate at report stage and
before beginning today's voting process, because the government
House leader is obviously preparing to propose a time allocation
motion, which will force the House to decide on the motions at
report stage starting at 6.30 this evening.
The Bloc Quebecois will have great difficulty in taking part in
a process of debate and voting which is a deviation from the
rules and conventions of this House.
Do not treat this point of privilege lightly. The gravity of
the situation imposes a duty to exercise diligence. The
credibility of the institution that is the House of Commons is
at stake.
I would remind you that I am still prepared to make the
necessary motion to return this matter to the Standing Committee
on Procedure and House Affairs, particularly the one element—for
my point of privilege involved two matters—relating to the
examination of a motion of privilege, which would refer to that
committee the question raised by the rejection of two
never-introduced amendments.
Before the debate is resumed, or as promptly as possible, and
especially before we vote, I expect your decision on the point
of order raised by my colleague for Beauharnois—Salaberry.
The Speaker: What I have heard is simply a summary of what you
said on March 1, before we left for the week's recess. I have
heard nothing new at this point. I have heard no new facts at
this point. I ask the members again, if they wish to intervene,
to keep to the facts. The hon. leader of the Bloc Quebecois.
Mr. Gilles Duceppe (Laurier—Sainte-Marie, BQ): Mr. Speaker, what
is new is that there will be closure in a few minutes and we
want to know whether you will give a ruling on either the motion
by the member for Rimouski—Mitis or on the question of
privilege raised on the point of order before we vote this
afternoon.
1200
It is new, because as far as we are concerned, and I am speaking
for myself personally and for all the members of my party, we
would be put in a situation where we would feel the debate on
Bill C-20 would not be impartial here. That is a serious matter.
The Speaker: What the hon. leader of the Bloc Quebecois has just
said is very serious. It questions the position of the Speaker
of the House. We must absolutely be impartial. We must manage
as the rules we have here require. I hope the impartiality of
the Speaker of the House of Commons will never be challenged.
Mr. Gilles Duceppe: Mr. Speaker, if we were to vote without
hearing a decision or a ruling on what was raised, which is very
serious, my colleagues and I would be in such a situation.
I want to know whether the ruling will be given before we vote.
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron (Verchères—Les-Patriotes, BQ): Mr. Speaker,
the leader of the Bloc Quebecois just presented in a very
eloquent way the problem that confronts us.
A question of privilege was originally raised by the hon. member
for Rimouski—Mitis, who just reminded you of its nature. There is
at least one new development, namely that the government is
about to impose closure, with the result that we will likely
begin to vote this evening, at 6.30 p.m., on the various
amendments proposed at report stage of Bill C-20.
This creates two problems. The first one, which was raised by
the hon. member for Rimouski—Mitis, is that two of our
amendments, on which we worked with the legislative counsel,
were deemed out of order before even having been tabled.
This greatly affected our ability to actually table these
amendments later on, since they were deemed out of order before
even having been tabled. This is not to mention the much more
fundamental issue of the confidentiality that must exist between
each member of parliament and the legislative counsels.
1205
As for the voting process that will likely begin this evening,
you will agree with me that it poses a problem.
The second problem concerns the amendments that were first
deemed to be out of order. Explanations were provided to us by
the Deputy Principal Clerk, who told us why these amendments had
been deemed out of order.
We went back to the drawing board. We rewrote these amendments
by taking into account the points raised and, surprise, these
amendments were again deemed to be out of order.
You will agree that, if you were to rule in favour of the
question of privilege raised by my colleague, it would then be
necessary to include in the various groups of amendments all
those amendments that were deemed out of order for a reason that
we feel totally unjustified. It would be necessary to include
these amendments in the various groups, so that they could be
voted on this evening.
You will agree that we cannot possibly begin the debate on the
amendments to Bill C-20. Moreover, we cannot begin to vote on
these amendments if the Chair has not rendered its decision.
I want to stress what the Bloc Quebecois leader just said.
If we were faced with the prospect of beginning the debate and,
worse yet, of voting on the amendments proposed at report stage
of Bill C-20, without the Chair having first made its ruling, we
would have no other choice but to conclude that Bloc Quebecois
members are not treated impartially.
The Speaker: You are facing me with a dilemma. I intend to
render my decision before the voting this evening.
It is a bit of a concern to me that an hon. member is
questioning the impartiality of the Chair of this House. I know
that the matters we are going to discuss, debate and vote on
today are very important ones.
As I have said, I intended to bring down my ruling before the
votes, but I do not know when the voting will take place. The
hon. member may know, but I do not. Perhaps it will be this
evening, as he said, at 6.30 p.m. Perhaps it will be next week.
I do not know at this point, because I have no document or
opinion before me indicating how we are going to proceed.
It is troubling, however, that the Chair be asked to tell when
this will be done, or face having his impartiality questioned.
It is my intention to bring down my rulings before today's
voting. If that is what the hon. member wanted to know, that is
my intention.
GOVERNMENT ORDERS
[Translation]
AN ACT TO GIVE EFFECT TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR CLARITY AS SET
OUT IN THE OPINION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA IN THE QUEBEC
SECESSION REFERENCE
BILL C-20—TIME ALLOCATION MOTION
Hon. Don Boudria (Leader of the Government in the House of
Commons, Lib.) moved:
That in relation to Bill C-20, an act to give effect to the
requirement for clarity as set out in the opinion of the Supreme
Court of Canada in the Quebec Secession Reference, not more than
one further sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration
of the report stage of the bill and one sitting day shall be
allotted to the third reading stage of the said bill and,
fifteen minutes before the expiry of the time provided for
government business on the day allotted to the consideration of
the report stage and on the day allotted to the third reading
stage of the said bill, any proceedings before the House shall
be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and
in turn every question necessary for the disposal of the state
of the bill then under consideration shall be put forthwith and
successively without further debate or amendment.
1210
[English]
The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the
motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: Call in the members.
1300
(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Assad
| Assadourian
|
Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
| Bakopanos
|
Barnes
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Bertrand
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Bonwick
| Boudria
| Bradshaw
|
Bryden
| Bulte
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Cannis
| Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
|
Cauchon
| Chan
| Clouthier
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Copps
| Cotler
| Cullen
|
DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
| Dion
| Discepola
|
Dromisky
| Drouin
| Duhamel
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Finlay
| Fontana
| Fry
|
Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Guarnieri
| Harb
| Harvard
| Hubbard
|
Iftody
| Jackson
| Jennings
| Jordan
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Knutson
|
Kraft Sloan
| Lastewka
| Leung
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Longfield
| MacAulay
| Mahoney
|
Malhi
| Maloney
| Manley
| Marleau
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| McCormick
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McTeague
| McWhinney
| Mifflin
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Minna
| Mitchell
| Murray
|
Myers
| Nault
| Normand
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
O'Reilly
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
| Parrish
|
Patry
| Peric
| Peterson
| Phinney
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Proud
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Redman
| Reed
| Richardson
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Saada
| Sekora
|
Serré
| Sgro
| Shepherd
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Szabo
| Telegdi
| Thibeault
|
Torsney
| Ur
| Valeri
| Vanclief
|
Whelan
| Wilfert – 130
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Ablonczy
| Alarie
| Anders
|
Asselin
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bailey
|
Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Blaikie
| Borotsik
| Brien
| Brison
|
Cadman
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Casey
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Dumas
|
Duncan
| Earle
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Gouk
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Hanger
| Harris
| Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Hilstrom
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Lowther
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Manning
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Mark
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
Mayfield
| McDonough
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Meredith
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Morrison
| Nystrom
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Price
|
Proctor
| Robinson
| Sauvageau
| Schmidt
|
Solberg
| St - Hilaire
| Stoffer
| Strahl
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
|
Wasylycia - Leis – 81
|
PAIRED
Members
Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
| Wood
|
The Speaker: I declare the motion carried.
* * *
[Translation]
POINTS OF ORDER
MOTIONS IN AMENDMENTTO BILL C-20—SPEAKER'S RULING
The Speaker: I am now prepared to deal with the point of
order raised by the hon. member for Beauharnois—Salaberry on
March 3, 2000 relating to certain motions in amendment to Bill
C-20, an act to give effect to the requirement for clarity as
set out in the opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada in the
Quebec Secession Reference, which were found out of order.
[English]
I would like to thank the hon. member for bringing this matter
to the attention of the House.
[Translation]
The hon. member stated that the motions in amendment submitted
to the journals branch were intended to clarify the working of
clauses 1(5) and 2(3) of Bill C-20 and did not go beyond the
scope of the bill. He maintained that, because the amendments
were ruled out of order, not only was he prevented from debating
them but that this action interfered with the rights of all
members of the House and constituted a restriction on his
freedom of expression and that of other members.
I can assure the hon. member that the scope and substance of the
amendments submitted by him were carefully considered.
1305
I also want to underline to the hon. member and the House that,
while preliminary assessments about such matters may be taken by
officials of the House, the review and approval of such
decisions remain the responsibility of the Speaker.
[English]
It is a responsibility that I take very seriously.
[Translation]
I have myself re-examined all of the amendments ruled out of
order, not in relation to their substance, but from a strictly
procedural perspective and I remain convinced that those
amendments the hon. member referred to do in fact go beyond the
scope and alter the principle of the bill as already agreed to
by the House.
I refer the hon. member for Beauharnois—Salaberry to page 666 of
the House of Commons Procedure and Practice. I wish to reassure
the member that the decision is purely procedural and not based
in any way on whether the subject matter is worthy of debate.
It was made in accordance with the traditions and practices of
this House.
For these reasons, I must conclude that the matter does not
constitute a valid point of order.
I thank the hon. member for raising this issue and trust that
this ruling has been helpful to him and to other hon. members.
Further to the question raised by the member for Rimouski—Mitis
on Friday, March 3, 2000, I wish to inform the House that there
was an error in the table for the voting on Bill C-20. The vote
on Motion No. 70 will apply to Motion No. 71. A revised voting
table is available from the table. I regret any inconvenience
this may have caused the hon. members.
* * *
PRIVILEGE
AMENDMENTS TO BILL C-20—SPEAKER'S RULING
The Speaker: The deputy House leader of the Bloc Quebecois raised a question
of privilege on March 1, 2000 relating to the rejection of two
motions in amendment to Bill C-20, an act to give effect to the
requirement for clarity as set out in the opinion of the Supreme
Court of Canada in the Quebec Secession Reference.
These motions in amendment, declared out of order by the clerks
involved with the bill, were never forwarded to the journals
branch for inclusion in the Notice Paper.
[English]
Before beginning I would like to thank the hon. member for
raising the matter. I also want to acknowledge the contributions
of the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, the hon.
member for Verchères—Les-Patriotes, as well as the House leader
for the Reform Party on this subject.
[Translation]
The acting House leader stated that on Tuesday, February 29,
2000, the Deputy Principal Clerk of the legislative unit
forwarded a letter to the office of the leader of the Bloc
Quebecois presenting the procedural details for rejecting some
700 motions in amendment to Bill C-20. These motions in amendment
were appended to the letter. The Bloc Quebecois had, in fact,
never forwarded two of the motions in amendment bearing the
reference numbers 5180 and 5163 to the journals branch for
inclusion in the Notice Paper.
After inquiries by the office of the leader of the Bloc
Quebecois, it became clear that the clerks working on the bill
had made an error by including reference to those two motions in
the covering letter.
The acting House leader argued that the privileges of the Bloc
Quebecois members and all members of the House have been
breached because of the actions of these clerks involved in the
performance of their duties, namely consulting a database that
the member contends is intended for the exclusive use of the
legislative counsel.
1310
The member went on to assert that the relationship of
confidentiality that must exist between the legislative counsel
and those members who request the drafting of amendments had
been breached and that this action constituted a contempt of the
House.
[English]
On behalf of all members of the House, I have looked carefully
into the actions and events related to this matter. Hon. members
should understand that House legislative counsel do not work in
isolation.
[Translation]
They are part of an operational team that supports the
legislative work of the Chamber and its committees. This group
is comprised of procedural clerks as well as legal drafters who
are assisted in their functions by text processing operators and
administrative support staff. The confidentiality to which the
acting House leader refers is shared by all staff within this
group for operational purposes.
There is no separate database for legislative counsel as the
hon. member suggests. The legislative database supports the work
of all persons having duties within the field of legislative
support operations.
[English]
Members should also understand that with respect to report
stage, there must be interaction between the staff of the
legislative services group, the clerk of the committee to which
the bill was referred, and the staff of the journals branch.
[Translation]
All staff of the House working in support of members in their
legislative function are governed by strict confidentiality with
regard to persons outside their operational field and, of
course, vis-à-vis other members.
In this case, I note there is no mention of any breach of
confidentiality whereby the text of proposed motions of the hon.
member or her party has been made known to persons working
outside the field of legislative support operations or to other
members. Confidential information proprietary to the Bloc
Quebecois and several of its members remained completely and
absolutely confidential.
Consequently, I am unable to find that this constitutes a prima
facie question of privilege or a contempt of the House.
I thank the acting House leader of the Bloc Quebecois for
bringing this matter to my attention and permitting me to make
this clarification to the House.
* * *
[English]
AN ACT TO GIVE EFFECT TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR CLARITY AS SET
OUT IN THE OPINION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA IN THE QUEBEC
SECESSION REFERENCE
The House resumed from March 3 consideration of Bill C-20, an
act to give effect to the requirement for clarity as set out in
the opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Quebec
secession reference, as reported (without amendment) from the
committee, and of the motions in Group No. 1.
Mr. Reg Alcock (Parliamentary Secretary to President of the
Queen's Privy Council for Canada and Minister of
Intergovernmental Affairs, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, at this point
I will use the three minutes I have remaining to remind the House
of why we are here and why we will end up in the position we seem
to be inexorably heading toward tonight.
After the 1995 referendum there was a decision to ask the
supreme court what we might do in the event of another
referendum. The court said very clearly that in a democracy like
Canada, should there be a clear expression of the will of a
population in a region of Canada on a clear question about the
secession of that province, the Government of Canada would be
obligated to negotiate. The government has come forward with a
piece of legislation that puts that decision into law and nothing
more. It adheres very closely to the decision of the supreme
court.
From the moment it was even hinted that we might undertake to do
that, at every opportunity the Bloc indicated there would be no
co-operation, no discussion, no debate and no attempt to work
together to improve legislation as is often done in the House.
That is the purpose of this Chamber.
I note that the New Democratic Party and its House leader, who
was a member on the committee, worked hard to review the bill and
put forward amendments. I note that even the Reform Party came
forward in support of the bill and also looked at ways in which
the bill could be improved.
1315
Unfortunately, we end up where we are, responding to the
unending stream of statements and actions by members of the Bloc
who say “It does not matter what the debate is. It does not
matter what the logic is. We are going to do everything we can
to stop this”. Therefore, we end up in a very sad place, a
place where it is no longer possible to debate. I am sorry that
we are here, but we are here. Let me be very clear on this. We
are here because of the consistent and continuing actions of one
party in the House.
Mr. Grant Hill (Macleod, Ref.): Madam Speaker, I
appreciate having the opportunity to speak briefly to Bill C-20.
The clarity bill, as it has been called, is a bill which the
official opposition supports in principle. I might say that we
support it in principle because we think that confusion is
antidemocratic.
However, we disagree with the haste of this process. We
disagree with the imposition of time allocation. We disagree
with the arbitrary nature that the committee used to decide who
would appear as witnesses before the committee. I will not spend
a lot of time on those things because that disagreement has been
well documented.
We believe that a well informed public is better than a confused
public. On an issue as important as the breakup of our country,
to be well informed is very sensible.
It is not often that a politician makes a comment about his
opposing politician. However, I would like to make a positive
comment about the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs across
the way. I believe that the minister has been forthright on this
issue. He has been pretty straight-up on this issue. He has not
changed his tune since he made up his mind that he was going to
look for clarity from the supreme court and carry it through. I
give him credit for that. He has been castigated in his home
province. He has been called unpleasant things. He has been
made fun of in caricatures. I would like him to know personally
that I do not agree with any of those things. I think he has
been at least honourable on this subject.
We can disagree with him, and I believe that it is fair to do
do, but in this instance I do not disagree with him. I want him
to know personally that I think the characterizations have not
been accurate nor proper.
I will spend a moment on the committee hearings to talk about
what I found most interesting. I attended all of the meetings
and found the old politicians to be the most interesting people
who appeared before the committee.
First, two of the witnesses I listened to opposed Bill C-20.
Claude Ryan, who is a man with enormous prestige in Quebec,
opposes Bill C-20, as well as Joe Clark, a politician who has had
many years of constitutional battles. I will not make comments
about the reasons they oppose the bill. They have reasons which
I think are debatable and arguable. However, those two senior
politicians both oppose Bill C-20.
I looked at those who came in support of Bill C-20. I found it
interesting that some of them fought those constitutional battles
with vigour themselves. I will list four of them: Claude
Castonguay, le père de l'assurance-santé, the father of medicare
in Quebec, is supportive of Bill C-20; Gil Rémillard, a senior
politician who has had long experience in Quebec, supports Bill
C-20 as well; and two politicians from outside Quebec, Ed
Broadbent and Bob Rae, both came to the committee and said they
support the bill.
I found it interesting when I asked them this question: “Did
you ever during your time battling these constitutional battles
ever say that a clear question was something that was valuable?”
They admitted that they had not.
They battled this without ever saying publicly that a clear
question was important.
1320
I also want to reflect on what Reformers think of the clarity
bill. I had the opportunity to poll Reformers. It was not a
poll which would reflect the views of every Canadian. It
reflected the views of Reform supporters.
It is fascinating that when asked if a clear question was
important, 98.7% of Reformers who responded said yes. When asked
the question, “Should the majority level be spelled out?”,
96.2% felt that the majority level should be spelled out. This
bill does not do that. That probably reflects my position that
the majority level could and should be spelled out.
When asked about the majority level, as to whether 50% plus one
was sufficient, especially if it also was to decide what part of
Quebec would stay in Canada, the percentage dropped to 77.6%,
still a pretty strong number of people saying that the level
should be spelled out.
I tried to reflect, all the way through the committee hearings,
on whether the question last time was clear. My way of deciding
was not to listen to those who on one side or the other have an
axe to grind, but to ask those who are experts in asking
questions of the public, and to my mind they are the pollsters,
those who do polling all the time. The pollsters told me that
when asking loaded questions we cannot expect anything but a
loaded answer. They ask “yes-no” questions, which of course
the referendum did as well.
When I asked the pollsters if the last question asked of
Quebecers was unambiguous or unconfusing, they said no, it was
neither; it was both ambiguous and confusing.
I posed to the pollsters what kind of question they would ask.
I received some uniformity in their answers, which I will distil
by saying that if there are two issues, two separate questions
would have to be asked. It would be something like the
following: “Do you want Quebec to enter a new economic
partnership” or whatever “with Canada?” To that question
there would be a response, yes or no.
I think that most Quebecers would probably answer yes, that they
would like to enter into a new partnership with Canada. However,
if we wanted to go further we would ask: “If that new
partnership is unsuccessful within a timeframe, do you want
Quebec to separate from Canada and sever all legal ties, yes or
no?” On that issue I believe that we would get a different
response from that which we had in the last referendum.
My analysis is that there are lots of people within and outside
Quebec who would like to have a new relationship with Ottawa, and
that relationship with Ottawa could well reflect a country that
was advancing, a country that was improving, a country with a
vigorous future. However, when asked if that new partnership
fails would they want to split up Canada, I think the response
might well be different. I know that there is very little
appetite for splitting up the country outside Quebec, and
certainly not in my part of the country.
Bill C-20 is imperfect. It could have been improved. It is a
step in the right direction. In principle it is supportable.
The official opposition will be supporting the bill unamended. I
think it literally will not be amended, unless there is some
surprise awaiting us.
It has been a privilege to represent interests from the western
part of the country on the bill.
Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg—Transcona, NDP): Madam
Speaker, I am grateful for the opportunity to say a few words
before this bill clears the House. In that respect, I want to
reiterate my view that this bill has been rushed through in a way
that has discredited the parliamentary process.
For the record, it has been one of the low points in my
parliamentary life, watching the way this bill has been handled,
both by the government and in some respects also by the Bloc
Quebecois, because it has created a situation in which something
as important as the legislative framework for the secession of a
province from Canada has not been able to be studied in the way
that it should have been studied.
We were not able to hear from as many people as we should have.
We were not able to hear from them in a context that was
constructive and open to real change.
1325
I see the minister in the House today and I am glad he is here.
I would like to echo the complimentary, positive attitude of the
member who just spoke, but I would find that difficult. I do not
think the minister and the government have been open, unless I am
wrong and I find out later today that they will be open to some
amendments. They have not been open to building a consensus
around the bill that would enable not just Liberals but others to
go forward and claim this very important piece of legislation as
their own, so that it would be clear that, with the exception of
the Conservatives, there was some measure of federalist unity on
this issue.
I have been part of this process before. Even Pierre Trudeau,
who was noted for his determination and has been called all kinds
of things, including arrogant, tried to do things in the early
eighties which the NDP felt were important so that he could bring
us on side.
That is related to what is happening today. At that time the
NDP would not support the patriation package unless it was
amended to recognize the inherent rights of aboriginal people.
That had been left out. What did Pierre Trudeau do? On the
basis of being urged by the NDP, the patriation package was
amended. That is why we have section 35 today.
But nothing was learned. In fact, some things seem to have been
unlearned. We have Bill C-20 before us, and we have a bill,
insofar as it affects aboriginal people, that is pre the
patriation package. It does not recognize them at all.
Then we have something which is pre the patriation package, or
worse, because in this context we have made recommendations, in
conjunction with the Assembly of First Nations, the Grand Council
of the Crees, the Inuit Tapirisat of Canada and others, and
pleaded with the minister to accept some of the amendments we
have officially made and which aboriginal organizations have
recommended. So far, nothing.
We will be voting later today and the word I get from the
government is “no amendments”. So even the wisdom of that
time, the early eighties, of Mr. Trudeau and others trying to
build something that could bring people together, is not for this
minister. No, he knows everything and the rest of us are just
chopped liver, including the aboriginal leadership and everyone
else.
This is constitution making, as it has to do with the possible
breakup of the country or how it could be kept together in the
event of a referendum, depending on how one looks at it. It
needs to be approached with a far different spirit and a far
different frame of mind from the way in which the current
minister has approached it. Frankly, he has made it very
difficult. Maybe that is what he wanted all along.
He is making it very difficult for myself and others in my
caucus who supported the principle of the bill, who supported the
idea that there be a legislative implementation or framework
established pursuant to the supreme court opinion. We have
supported the need for a clear question, which is absolutely
fundamental to any referendum, the need for the rest of Canada to
be able to pronounce on whether it was a clear question and would
justify negotiations on secession, the need for a clear majority,
the fact that democracy was more than just a simple majority and
that there was a need for a qualitative judgment after the fact.
All of these things we have supported.
All we asked was that what the Assembly of First Nations and
others have identified as a fundamental flaw, to use the language
which they used in a letter released this weekend, be addressed,
that aboriginal people be listed as political actors, and that
the government be obliged to take their view into account.
Those are the two easiest amendments for the government. We have
submitted about six or seven amendments having to do with
aboriginal concerns, but the two easiest ones for the government
were to simply list aboriginal people along with the provinces,
territories and the Senate as people whose views the minister
would want to take into account in determining whether there was
a clear question and subsequently whether there was a clear
majority.
1330
The government will not do that. Why not? There is absolutely
no good reason for not putting the aboriginal people on that list
of people whose views need to be taken into account. There is not
a person on the other side of the House who could stand up and
give me one good reason why those two amendments could not be
accepted, except for the unmitigated, titanic, bloody arrogance
of that man over there, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs
who thinks he knows everything about this country and that the
rest of us do not have anything to say.
Mr. Lynn Myers: Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of
order. I believe that is unduly provocative and unparliamentary.
I think it is uncalled for and the member should withdraw what he
just said.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I believe that the
member has gone overboard slightly this time. I will ask him to
resume debate but to please choose his words more carefully.
Mr. Bill Blaikie: Madam Speaker, I have no intention of
apologizing because I did not say anything unparliamentary. All
I did was speak the truth.
Further to what I had to say, the government is revealing an
attitude toward this place that should concern the government
backbenchers. They themselves should be as concerned as I am.
They should be concerned about the way their own government is
acting.
The government is bringing into disrepute the parliamentary
process. It is bringing into disrepute a piece of legislation
that those members say is very important and which we agree is
very important. We said from the beginning we would try to take
this process seriously, even though it was introduced
surreptitiously on a Friday when the government said it would not
come in until Monday, then closure was moved on second reading,
then closure was moved in committee and we could not hear
witnesses we wanted to hear. Now we have this process. All the
way along there has been nothing but stonewalling, nothing but a
totally closed door and not just to us.
In the end it does not matter what happens to the NDP or our
amendments but it matters what happens to the ideas that our
amendments embody. That is that there should not be a retreat
from Charlottetown. There should not be a retreat from section
35. There should not be a retreat from all the things we have
accomplished in the last 15 years to establish aboriginal people
as constitutional and political actors in this country. That is
what this bill does. That is what makes it so fundamentally
unacceptable and regrettable.
I am here not just in sorrow but also in anger. I feel we could
have done much better as a parliament. We could have done much
better as a committee in spite of the fact that we had the kind
of obstacles that were put in our way by the Bloc Quebecois. The
government could have taken St. Paul's advice and tried to
overcome evil with good instead of wrong for wrong, arrogance for
arrogance, mistake for mistake, contempt for contempt. That is
all we got. It is regrettable, truly regrettable.
[Translation]
Mr. André Bachand (Richmond—Arthabaska, PC): Madam Speaker, this
is one of the last minutes in which we can speak of this bill.
The way things are going at present with the government, this
may be one of the last times MPs will be able to speak in this
House. Having three gag orders on one bill is absolutely
incredible. That is how the present government operates.
I will savour these next 10 minutes, because I am not sure
whether the government will allow me to speak on behalf of my
party for the rest of the session. That is how things are going
at this time.
1335
I would like to make two or three brief comments. First of all,
one to my caucus. From the start, four members had decided to
support the bill, because everyone agrees that having clarity on
the question and on what constitutes a majority might facilitate
things.
I am addressing them. I hope that the hon. members are going to
see that the way the government is handling this bill is
preventing the elected representatives and citizens of this
country from being able to really speak out and reflect on this
matter. I trust that my colleagues are going to see what is
going on.
In a referendum process, after a yes vote of 50% plus one,
imagine how we are going to have our cage rattled, how much the
few rights remaining to the opposition will be trampled. The
way the Liberals are handling things now is not a very good sign
for the future.
I trust that our party will be the same as the country on Bill
C-20—united.
I heard what the Reform Party critic had to say. Not to be
disrespectful of the Reform, but I had a picture in my head. I
do not know if hon. members are familiar with the Simpsons, but
when people want to make fun of Homer Simpson, they stick a sign
on his back.
[English]
The signs says “kick me”. I think the Reform Party has a sign
on its back which says “Please kick me. I will love you
anyway”. That is the problem with the Reform Party. It is so
afraid of losing one vote on this issue in western Canada that it
is willing to have a sign on its back which says “Please kick
me. I will love you anyway. I am going to support the bill
anyway”.
[Translation]
There has been closure three times. The Reformers say they do
not agree with the process, but support the bill nevertheless.
It makes no sense. The official opposition is going around
saying that the government is wrong “No, you should not do that,
you Liberals, it is wrong, but we like you all the same and will
support you in this”. Such principles are not exactly cast in
stone.
There is my NDP colleague as well, who is in fine fettle today
and who said “It makes no sense the way they are treating the
first nations”. He is right, but his party will support the
bill in any case.
The member for Mount Royal, the expert on the committee, said to
the first nations “Your message has been clearly heard, we will
see there are amendments to have your thoughts taken into
account. No more, however. It will be like the provinces. We
will look after everything, trust us”.
The member for Winnipeg—Transcona had his show, of course, but
according to the member for Mount Royal, the government will
support the first nations amendment. But, what happens if the
government does not support the amendment? There will be
problems with the credibility of the member for Mount Royal,
who, in committee, seemed to be speaking for the government.
But, in addition to that, what is happening with the New
Democratic Party's opposition?
What I would ask my colleagues in the Reform Party is to take
off the sign that says “kick me” and say it makes no sense.
I say to our NDP colleagues that we will be pleased to support
their first nations amendment. Our amendments were rejected for
the most part, in any case. We wanted clarity amendments. We
proposed clarity amendments and they were rejected in the
process.
1340
Do you know what amendments we moved? We proposed inclusion of
the words province of Quebec and National Assembly in the bill.
I base my remarks on what the Minister of Intergovernmental
Affairs said when he spoke about Bill C-20. In his 16 page
testimony before the legislative committee, the minister did not
mention British Columbia, Prince Edward Island or Cape Breton.
He spoke only of Quebec throughout those 16 pages.
During his whole testimony, he said how evil the sovereignists
and the Progressive Conservatives of Quebec were.
The government says “This bill is about clarity”. We want to
help it make things even clearer. The title of the bill refers
to Quebec, the preamble refers to Quebec and the minister, the
Prime Minister and witnesses spoke of Quebec but the bill itself
does not mention Quebec.
The word Quebec does not appear one single time in the text of
the bill. Why? Because they were too afraid. The sensitivities
of Quebecers could put the federal government at risk in the
future. As a principle, it is rather feeble.
What we hope is that all opposition parties will send a very
clear message: this bill is incomplete, it is a plan B bill, B
as in baseball bat.
[English]
One does not run a country with a baseball bat. That is not the
way this country should function. That is a big problem. These
stem from baseball bats or batons.
[Translation]
I believe there should be much more openness. Canadians should
be very concerned about the way this government is dealing with
this bill. The minister, in all his good will—let us give him
that—must be extremely disappointed that his bill had to go
through the parliamentary process. This bill has to be passed.
Why? So that the Prime Minister may say next weekend “We got it.
Now, here is the good news: thanks to the wonderful work of the
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, of Cabinet and of the
Liberal Party caucus and thanks to my political instinct, if you
want to break the country, you will need to ask a clear question
and to obtain a clear majority”.
It is a rather feeble excuse. They are happy, the country is
saved. But no. They are being told “Well, now you are going to
separate”. I remember one very interesting comment amongst all
the relevant comments we heard. There were some good witnesses,
not enough, however, because we did not have enough time, but
some. This one was from a witness from British Columbia. In
passing, it was not a Conservative, but a Liberal. He said that
no matter what the question was, for example the question used
in 1995 or in 1980, with a result of 50% plus one—
You are now entering a new world.
He said “Whether there is any legislation or not, you are in a
new political, economic and legal world”.
The legislation can be improved as much as they want, what will
happen with a result of 50% plus one on a question like the one
used in 1995 and 1980, will be something new. It is certainly
not Bill C-20 that will solve everything, on the contrary. It
prevents us from finding solutions or alternatives. We are stuck
with a table of contents, a modus operandi. And they call that
flexibility.
The ambiguity Mr. Clark was talking about is the same ambiguity
that we were faced with when Mr. Trudeau said, back in 1980 “If
you vote no, it means yes”. Now that is ambiguity. As far as
flexibility is concerned, it remains to be seen.
I urge all the opposition parties and my colleagues in the
Conservative caucus to stand up and to stand united as we want
the country to be.
Mr. Yvan Bernier (Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok, BQ):
Madam Speaker, you will appreciate that I was anxious to take
part in this debate. We are not pleased, however, to have to
speak to such an issue, to a bill on clarity which, I must say,
does not provide any.
1345
Instead, the bill before us creates confusion. It is
unreasonable and undemocratic. It fails to respect the letter
and the spirit of the opinion provided by the supreme court at
the request of the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs.
The Bloc Quebecois certainly moved many amendments, but when the
government wants to introduce a bill on clarity, it must be
clear.
Let me read an amendment that I moved and which is part of Group
No. 1. We were asking, in Motion No. 2, that Bill C-20, in the
preamble, be amended by adding, before line 1 on page 1, the
following—and this is very important. You will understand later:
Whereas when the Quebec people were consulted by a referendum in
1995, the winning choice was the one that obtained a majority of
the votes declared valid, that is, fifty percent of the votes
plus one vote;
The people on the other side won last time. If they participated
and are still here, it is because we are democrats and we
respect the result of the votes. But they are scared of the
results, perhaps because the results were tight that time.
What did the government promise to us before the referendum?
That it would recognize the distinctiveness of Quebecers. That
was in the speech delivered in Verdun. We have already gone
further.
What about this declaration? The Prime Minister wasted no time
in pushing through this House a motion on distinct society.
You are the Chair. A motion is not as powerful as legislation.
When they want to tell Quebecers that they love them, they use a
motion. It is barely worth the paper it is written on. When
they want to clobber Quebecers, they use legislation. I am not
inventing this. We have a bill before us.
I would also like to add to the four adjectives I used earlier
an explanation on how this bill is confusing. It has to do with
the arbitrary criteria the minister is trying to include. He
wants to reserve the right to decide whether the question is
clear.
You have visited all of Canada and know that some expressions
used in eastern Canada are meaningless in western or central
Canada.
For example, there is one we often use in Quebec when it rains.
We say that it is raining nails, whereas in English they say
that it is raining cats and dogs.
Maybe the image is too simple, but how can they ask some
different provinces to determine the clarity of a question when
we have our own way of expressing ourselves in Quebec, as can
easily be seen from the ads in Quebec. Sometimes we use a
colourful language, but everybody understands.
The last time, the Prime Minister understood, but now he is not
quite sure. The day before the referendum he said “To remain
Canadian or not, to stay or to leave, that is the issue of the
referendum”. If even he could understand the question, it means
that the question was clear.
Why should we waste the time of the House in a debate like this?
During this time, the economic issues in this country are being
ignored. In the finance minister's last budget, we do not find a
single word about areas like mine which are hurting.
We are just back from a one week recess. People in Quebec and in
the Gaspé peninsula do not need clarity. What they need is money
to boost their economy. However, we never talk about that in the
House. I would like the House to discuss reasonable initiatives,
and give resources to people in our ridings.
This bill is unreasonable because it gives the federal
government plenty of reasons to prevent any negotiation from
taking place. Let us consider all the steps we have to go
through. We have to consult the provinces and the first nations.
I like the first nations, but let us not forget that what is at
stake is the right of Quebecers to decide their own future.
1350
When we joined confederation, there was no referendum. The
fathers of confederation made that decision among themselves.
However, the surprising thing is that, when more provinces
joined the federation, we were never asked for our permission.
We are nice chaps, we did not object in any way.
I know what I am talking about. I am come from the Gaspé
peninsula, the eastern tip of Quebec. All the ships carrying
settlers travelling to Upper Canada sailed in front of our
homes, but today, they are highhanded with our economy and our
future. People in my riding are fed up with such a government.
The bill is unreasonable because it also prevents Quebec from
offering a partnership to Canada. They want us to look like the
bad guys while they take away all the furniture including the
kitchen sink. We want to be able to make the decisions
concerning our future by ourselves, including the decision to
say that we would have a brighter future outside of Canada.
Every time we want to improve on things, we are gagged.
The bill is unreasonable also because it is contrary to the
position of all political parties in Quebec. Even Jean Charest,
the saviour, a former member of this House who was sent to
Quebec, does not approve of Bill C-20. Quebec's consensus should
be taken into account.
The bill is undemocratic because it subordinates the democratic
will of the Quebec people to the will of the rest of Canada. It
is our future. Let us decide by ourselves what we want.
The bill is undemocratic also because the federal government is
appropriating the right to reject the vote of Quebecers. The
bill will give more weight to a federalist vote than to a
sovereigntist vote.
The bill does not respect the letter and spirit of the supreme
court opinion. The Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs has
made up requirements that are not mentioned in that opinion.
The bill does not respect the letter and spirit of the supreme
court opinion because the government chose what it liked in that
opinion and threw away all other democratic considerations. What
this bill proposes is unilateral action when the supreme court
condemned such a course of action.
In its opinion, the court insisted on the need to negotiate when
the bill is geared to prevent any negotiation. I move:
As many members have said, after being gagged, censured and
subjected to time allocation, as the member for
Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok, I will have had
only 10 minutes to speak to a bill that could have an impact on
the future of Quebec and of my fellow citizens. It is not normal
that we were given only 10 minutes. If they want to claim to be
great democrats, they should let people express themselves.
I understand that this is not the Chair's fault. You are there
to apply the rules, but I believe that, for the people opposite,
democracy does not mean much. When I see the minister's smile, I
believe that he despises the people of my riding and of Quebec.
When he returns to Quebec, he will have to answer for that smile.
1355
[English]
Mr. Lynn Myers (Waterloo—Wellington, Lib.): Madam
Speaker, it is with great honour that I enter the debate today.
What we are discussing is very important. It seems to underpin
the very democratic process not only of parliament, but of the
Canadian way in terms of how we do things and the importance of
what it means to act in a democratic fashion.
I listened with great interest to the Reform Party and the
member for Macleod. The one thing with which I agreed was his
congratulations to the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs.
The minister has done a tremendous job in this whole process and
deserves our congratulations, respect and thanks. Not only is he
a great Canadian but he is also a great Quebecer. It bodes well
for us as we move confidently into the 21st century to have a
person of his calibre leading very positively in the way he is
along with the Prime Minister.
The Reform Party really flip-flopped on this issue. It is
always disturbing to see how it never stands for Canada when it
counts.
I listed too to the NDP and the member for Winnipeg—Transcona.
He got a little outraged and put on a little theatre for us in
the House. Really what he did was quite trite. I assume he
knows his constitutional history but he certainly did not show it
today. If he knew his constitutional history he would know that
the aboriginal peoples are covered off in the constitution. They
will be very much at the table when it comes to making these
kinds of decisions not only for themselves and for whom and what
they represent, but for Canada as a whole.
I say to him and all Canadians, that process is in place and in
hand and we will do it in a manner consistent with the values—
Mr. Peter Stoffer: Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of
order. If the hon. member would understand the facts of what the
member for Winnipeg—Transcona said—
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): That is debate. That
is not a point of order.
Mr. Lynn Myers: Madam Speaker, I will tell you what I am
saying. It astonished me, and the member reminds me of what the
leader of the NDP did when we first brought in the clarity bill.
Outside she was quoted as saying that the bill was stupid and
provocative. Those were exactly her words. I find it shameful
that the NDP would take that kind of attitude on such an
important bill, the clarity bill which underpins the very
importance of not only who we are but what we represent.
I say to my hon. colleagues in the Progressive Conservative
Party opposite, the party of Sir John A. Macdonald and Cartier,
imagine how they would be spinning in their graves. Imagine how
they are today listening to the Progressive Conservatives not
standing up for Canada, not being on the right side of history,
being on the wrong side of history, and their leader Joe Clark
saying the kind of nonsense he has been saying with respect to
this all important bill. It is shameful that the party of Sir
John A. and the party of Cartier has come to that. It is
absolutely disgraceful.
I had to give my head a shake to really understand what the Bloc
member who spoke before me was trying to say. Imagine having to
bring in an amendment to an amendment. Imagine threatening, as
Bloc members have now done, a thousand amendments on three
clauses. Imagine getting up day after day in the House of
Commons, in this great place of democracy, and reading 300 press
clippings and always caterwauling away. They say they represent
the democrats when in fact it is quite the opposite. They are
undemocratic. All they are trying to do is stall the business of
the House, stall what Canadians want us to do which is to bring
clarity to the debate once and for all.
But what do they do? They keep stalling. Even at the committee
they went on for five hours to try to talk it out so that the
business of the committee could not take place. Imagine the
disgrace and the shame. Quebecers and Canadians wherever they
live want no part of that kind of nonsense because it is
ridiculous. It undermines the very Canada for which we stand.
I cannot believe that they—
1400
The Speaker: Order, please. The hon. member has at least
five minutes left to speak, but it is 2 o'clock and we will now
proceed to Statements by Members.
STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS
[English]
COMMONWEALTH DAY
Ms. Sarmite Bulte (Parkdale—High Park, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, today I invite Canadians to celebrate Commonwealth Day,
remembering our shared heritage and ready to work together to
tackle the challenges that lie ahead.
This year's theme, the communications challenge, is highly
appropriate at the start of the new millennium. Recent advances
in communications technology bring the challenge of ensuring that
the advantages of modern communications are available to all and
that they are used to bring us closer together.
Just a few months ago the Commonwealth held its heads of
government meeting in a democratic South Africa. There leaders
praised the role that the Commonwealth played in bringing an end
to apartheid. Nigeria, fresh from its own elections, also
expressed its gratitude for the Commonwealth's efforts to restore
democracy there.
Clearly the Commonwealth is making a positive contribution in
the world today.
* * *
RELIGION
Mr. Jim Abbott (Kootenay—Columbia, Ref.): Mr. Speaker,
last Thursday protesters vandalized the Mary Queen of the World
Cathedral in Montreal. They were yelling against religion, spray
painting and defacing the cathedral, and overturning the
tabernacle and ripping up hymn books.
Seven people have been charged with unlawful assembly, assault
against police officers and obstruction. Hate crime charges were
not considered because “the elements were not there for charges
of that kind”.
Anti-religious vandalism such as this cowardly act is a hate
crime regardless of the religion, denomination or location, yet
our justice system discriminates between religions. A
National Post editorial notes:
What is missing is media and political outrage. Anti-Christian
hostility is one of the last acceptable bigotries in Canada. It
is observable not only in the bigots and thugs who attacked the
cathedral, but in federal bureaucrats, for example, who
instructed Swissair crash site mourners to make no mention of
Jesus Christ.
We would never accept an attack on other religious groups. We
should not remain silent when Catholics are the targets of
intolerance. Where is the outrage?
* * *
DAN DOYLE
Mr. John Finlay (Oxford, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, on March 6
at 10.30 a.m., Dan Doyle of Woodstock, Ontario demonstrated great
generosity and selflessness when he jumped between a car and a
baby stroller, saving Brenda Craig and her 22 month old son,
Barry. In the resulting collision, Dan Doyle suffered a
fractured leg and rib while the mother and her child were unhurt.
Police and public alike are calling Mr. Doyle a hero. Mr.
Doyle's wife commented that his actions did not surprise her as
he is always watching out for other people and lending a hand
whenever possible.
We are not often faced with life-threatening situations. It is
heartening to know that there are some citizens who are not
afraid to put themselves in harm's way to save the life of
another.
I am proud to acknowledge the heroism of Dan Doyle. Thank you,
Dan, for your heroic example.
* * *
SENIORS
Mr. Andrew Telegdi (Kitchener—Waterloo, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, the Alliance of Seniors to Protect Canada's Social
Programs represents 25 organizations with a combined membership
of over 500,000 seniors.
The alliance has declared Toronto the most diverse city in the
world. It has noted that seniors reflect this diversity racially,
ethnically and culturally. Many seniors who are immigrants are
socially isolated due to limited language skills, cultural
inhibitions and discrimination. This makes accessibility to
social programs and services more difficult particularly in the
areas of health, community care access, housing and education.
The Government of Canada and the Alliance of Seniors to Protect
Canada's Social Programs recognize the importance of funding for
health care, the specific needs of seniors, and the special
linguistic and cultural requirements of minority communities.
We are committed to working with seniors toward programs and
services consistent with cultural backgrounds and needs of our
diverse and aging population. Together we will maintain and
enhance Canada's social programs in keeping with Canada's
reputation as the best country in the world in which to live.
* * *
[Translation]
MINING INDUSTRY
Mr. Guy St-Julien (Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik, Lib.): Mr. Speaker,
RSW-Béroma of Val-d'Or will operate the first small scale mine in
the Abitibi, with a modular plant for ore concentration.
The unique features of this concept, compared to a conventional
plant, are its investment costs, its quick installation and its
mobility.
This initiative was made possible thanks to the leadership of
Laurent Bérubé and his team at the Val-d'Or plant, Charles
Veilleux, Gilbert Rousseau and Roger Jolicoeur, and the
involvement of the National Research Council of Canada and of
the Secretary of State for the Economic Development Agency of
Canada for the Regions of Quebec and Liberal member for
Outremont, through his IDEA-SME program.
The project is located at the Granada gold deposit, northwest of
Val-d'Or, in the Abitibi.
* * *
1405
[English]
TARA SLOAN
Mr. Eric Lowther (Calgary Centre, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, I
rise today to pay respect to Tara Sloan, one of Canada's top
swimmers. Ms. Sloan passed on two days ago in Calgary after
being involved in a tragic car accident.
Tara was a five time Canadian breaststroke champion and set the
women's 100 metre breaststroke national record in the short
course pool. She was a great competitor with a passion for life
who proudly represented her country at the world championships,
the Pan American Games and the Commonwealth Games. She won 17
international medals.
At the national championships this weekend her Calgary teammates
dedicated their events to Tara. Her teammates won. They won the
men's and women's overall team titles.
Today our sympathy and the thoughts and prayers of this House
join with those of the family, friends, teammates and competitors
of this wonderful young Canadian, Ms. Tara Sloan.
* * *
[Translation]
FIGHT AGAINST RACISM
Mr. Bernard Patry (Pierrefonds—Dollard, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, the
launching of the week against racism is taking place today, at
the Cinémathèque québécoise. This year's theme is about the
faces of racism in Quebec.
We must lead the fight against racism on an individual and
collective level.
We must always appreciate the opportunity that we have to share
our values of support and solidarity with cultural communities.
As individuals, we have a responsibility to apply these values
in our daily lives, so that those who settle in Canada feel at
home here.
However, the fight against racism is far from over. We must
eliminate the resistance that still exists, to ensure that all
new Canadians have access to a certain quality of life.
I call on all governments and organizations to work together to
ensure the best possible future for those who decide to come to
live in Canada.
* * *
BILL C-20
Mr. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ): Mr. Chairman, for the past few
days, the government House leader has been suffering from
proceduritis, and has been trying to change the rules of
Parliament through trickery.
Not content to have limited the debates on Bill C-20 in
committee, and not content to have rammed Bill C-20 through, the
specialist in dirty tricks and double-dealing has added insult to
injury with Motions Nos. 8 and 9, in order to change the rules
of the game in the midst of the debate.
How shameful, particularly for the Liberal members, who do not
want to voice their opinions on Bill C-20. We can understand
that the sole intent of the latest trick of the Leader of the
Government in the House of Commons was to allow his colleagues
to avoid their duty as parliamentarians.
When the voting on Bill C-20 takes place, the people of Quebec
will finally know who is prepared to stand up to defend its
rights and who is prepared to stand up to defend democracy.
* * *
[English]
FARM SAFETY
Mrs. Rose-Marie Ur (Lambton—Kent—Middlesex, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, with National Farm Safety Week about to end, let us
resolve to reduce farm related injuries throughout the year.
Farming is a way of life for over 200,000 farm families from
coast to coast to coast. It is also a profession with one of the
highest risks of on the job injury and death. Close to 700
Canadians died of farm related injuries between 1990 and 1996.
Most of these could have been prevented. Working with tractors
and other self-propelled equipment remains the leading cause of
death and injury with rollovers and runovers a serious concern.
Agriculture Canada and the Canadian Federation of Agriculture
along with other farm safety groups are urging farmers to equip
their tractors with rollover protection structures and seatbelts.
That is what National Farm Safety Week is all about, getting
farmers and their families thinking about how they can protect
themselves from what are often needless injuries on their farms.
* * *
CURLING
Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, Ref.): Mr.
Speaker, on behalf of the people of British Columbia I would like
to declare that B.C. now stands for “Best Curlers”.
Yesterday skip Greg McAulay of New Westminster completed the
trillium of champions by capturing his first Brier championship
against the formidable Russ Howard.
British Columbia will be representing Canada at the World
Curling Championships in three categories: men's, featuring Greg
McAulay's rink of Brent Pierce, Brian Miki, Jody Svestrup and
Darin Fenton; women's, featuring Richmond's Kelley Law's rink of
Julie Skinner, Georgina Wheatcroft, Diane Nelson and Elaine
Dagg-Jackson; and junior men's, featuring Kelowna's Brad Kuhn's
team of Kevin Folk, Ryan Kuhn and Hugh Bennett.
I would also like to take this opportunity to thank the people
of Saskatoon who organized and supported the Year 2000 Brier,
setting a new attendance record.
Curling has long been one of Canada's favourite sports and now
British Columbia leads the way. Congratulations and good luck to
all at the world championships.
* * *
CHIEF JOE MATHIAS
Mr. Lou Sekora (Port Moody—Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, Chief Joe Mathias passed away
unexpectedly on Friday, March 10. He was a strong advocate and
defender of the treaty process.
1410
I knew Chief Mathias personally. He was a man greatly respected
by his people, myself and many other people. Our blessings are
with him and his family.
* * *
OVERSEAS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
Mr. Dennis Gruending (Saskatoon—Rosetown—Biggar, NDP):
Mr. Speaker, the recent federal budget comes as a major
disappointment to Canadians who care about the poorest of the
poor in our world.
The Prime Minister talks big when he travels abroad but under
his watch, Canadian overseas development assistance has fallen
off dramatically. Canada's target was to provide .7 of 1% of the
gross national product to foreign assistance. Under this
government we have slipped back to about one-third of that target
and the budget does not improve things.
The Canadian Council for International Cooperation tells us that
we will be spending a smaller and smaller percentage of GNP on
foreign assistance through to the year 2003.
The development needs are enormous in the areas of food,
nutrition and agriculture, for basic education and health care,
especially for women.
In the budget the government has lost an opportunity to do
something really constructive for the poor and the vulnerable in
other countries. Canadians are a generous people but the
government has not matched their generosity.
* * *
[Translation]
THE LATE MARCEL PÉPIN
Mrs. Francine Lalonde (Mercier, BQ): Mr. Speaker, on March 6, we
lost Marcel Pépin.
Marcel Pépin left his mark on Quebec and on his era, first as
President of the CSN from 1965 to 1976, and then of the World
Confederation of Labour. After studying under Father Lévesque
at Laval University, he went on to contribute greatly to making
the CSN, a labour federation that was as combative as it was
democratic, the spearhead of the Quiet Revolution.
The “society built for man” which he sought could only come
about as the result of a fight to the finish between the workers
and all those with power.
The union movement needed to unite andopen up a second social
front in order to constitute a counter-balance to prevent workers
from being crushed, dominated and deprived of their voice.
His texts and moral reviews, containing such sayings as “There
is no more place for Quebec in the present system” or “Our own
means are all we can count on” have marked Quebec in general,
but have had far more impact on the public sector coalition,
which would never have existed without him. With his great
experience as a negotiator, Marcel Pépin had the knack of
obtaining the best settlements, always in favour of the little
people above all.
Thank you, Marcel Pépin.
* * *
JOB CREATION IN CANADA
Mrs. Marlene Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, on March 9, Statistics Canada released encouraging news
about Canada's employment situation.
Based on its labour force survey, Statistics Canada determined
that the unemployment rate was at 6.8% in February 1999, the
lowest rate since April 1976.
Moreover, in February, 36,000 new jobs were created, thus
continuing a pattern that began three years ago.
Finally, 1.9 million jobs were created since we came to office,
in 1993.
In short, all Canadians are benefiting from economic conditions
that promote job creation. These conditions were largely created
by our Liberal government.
* * *
[English]
REFUGEES
Mr. David Price (Compton—Stanstead, PC): Mr. Speaker, I
have just returned from a refugee camp in the northern part of
Kenya. The camp has over 120,000 refugees, mostly Somalians,
displaced for over nine years, living in conditions we could not
even dream of.
I have to commend the people working in these camps, the United
Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and all the NGOs, such as
Médecins sans frontières, the World Food Organization and all the
dedicated church groups.
I want to thank the Canadian High Commissioner in Nairobi and
all of his staff for setting up the details for this very
important visit. I want to thank our immigration officers and
staff in Kenya and London for letting our group sit in during
interviews which included the minister of immigration and the
member for Mississauga West.
Last but not least, I want to thank the minister's staff for
setting up this on the ground experience of looking at how we
determine refugees, immigrants and visitor visas.
* * *
JUNO AWARDS
Ms. Eleni Bakopanos (Ahuntsic, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, last
night we all celebrated with Canada's best at the 29th annual
Juno Awards in Toronto. The quality and diversity of Canadian
artists nominated at these awards reflects the excellence of our
country's musical creators and performers. The awards they won
are a prestigious national recognition of their talent.
[Translation]
Congratulations to Bryan Adams and Chantal Kreviazuk, for
winning best male and female artists of the year.
[English]
Let me congratulate Paul Brandt for winning best country male
artist and Shania Twain for best songwriter. Let me also
congratulate SKY for winning best new group and Sarah
McLachlan for winning the international achievement award.
1415
[Translation]
I also want to congratulate Diana Krall—she is my favourite—for
winning best vocal jazz album, the Quebec group La Chicane, for
winning best-selling francophone album, and all the other Juno
winners. We cannot name them all today, because we do not have
time.
[English]
Canada can be proud of its musical talent and of the recognition
it receives from both Canadian and international audiences.
ORAL QUESTION PERIOD
[English]
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Preston Manning (Leader of the Opposition, Ref.): Mr.
Speaker, in August the human resources department prepared a
communication strategy for the minister. The aim was to manage
the release of an internal audit that pointed to gross
mismanagement of taxpayer dollars by the minister. The document
suggested three options for releasing and communicating the
results of that audit: a reactive approach, a low key approach,
and a proactive approach. Each came with suggested advantages
and disadvantages.
Why did the minister choose the reactive approach as outlined in
that communication strategy?
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, let us be clear that the communications
plan was a draft. It was prepared before the audit was even
complete. It is usual for departments, particularly
communications officials, to prepare this kind of information.
It was not forwarded to me, nor would I have expected it to have
been.
Mr. Preston Manning (Leader of the Opposition, Ref.): Mr.
Speaker, let us be clear. We have a copy finally of this
communications brief. It outlines three distinct approaches,
going from the most transparent, the proactive approach, to the
least transparent, the reactive approach. The reactive strategy
suggests carrying on business as usual and not releasing the
results of the audit until forced to do so by an access to
information request.
We are talking about an audit dealing with gross mismanagement
of taxpayer dollars. Why did the minister choose the least
transparent strategy for handling that internal audit?
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, again let me say that this was a draft
report.
If the hon. member wants to talk about fact, let us look at what
we did. It was this side of the House, it was me, as minister,
who made this report public. Quite frankly, it had nothing to do
with an access to information request by that party.
Mr. Preston Manning (Leader of the Opposition, Ref.): Mr.
Speaker, let us go over it again. The minister had an internal
audit on her desk revealing gross mismanagement of taxpayer
dollars. Her departmental spin doctors presented her with three
options for releasing the information to the public. The words
“demonstrates transparency” were only used in connection with
one approach, the proactive approach. The approach the minister
chose was described as simply “demonstrating business as
usual”.
Again, how can the minister claim she is being transparent when
she rejected the one communications approach her own departmental
people said—
The Speaker: The hon. Minister of Human Resources
Development.
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, we came clean with the Canadian public.
We made the internal audit public. We presented to the House
10,000 pages of projects. I wonder when members of that party
will come clean with the Canadian public and say that they were
wrong when they said $3 billion was missing, that they were wrong
when they said $1 billion was missing, that they were wrong when
they said it was an access to information request—
Some hon. members: Hear, hear.
Miss Deborah Grey (Edmonton North, Ref.): Mr. Speaker,
let me just tell the minister that we are getting close with all
of these investigations going on. It will be surprising how much
money they actually do come up with.
I would have thought that with a week away from the House she
could have come up with a better strategy than that.
In August her officials had a plan to release the internal
audit. They chose three strategies: a transparent one, a
semi-transparent one and a hide and seek version. The so-called
reactive strategy involved the department carrying on business as
usual until it got caught.
Why did the minister choose a “let us not get caught”
strategy?
1420
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I do not know where that party has been,
but it is me and my department that made this internal audit
public. It is my department that chose to implement a six point
plan that is now making a difference.
From the point of view of the work of the Human Resources
Development Department, we are taking this very seriously. We
have said that over and over again and I, quite frankly, do not
know where these questions are coming from.
Miss Deborah Grey (Edmonton North, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, I
will tell you where this party has been. We have been filing
access to information requests because this minister was not
forthcoming.
Let me also add that the minister continues to say that she came
forward with her little six point plan and everything was going
to be all right. The only reason she made this plan public was
because she knew she had been caught in the act.
Was the minister gambling that this little plan would be
uncovered before the next election?
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I categorically deny that it was an
access to information request that made this report public. It
is very clear from letters between myself and my deputy that I
took this very seriously. It is clear that the approach which we
have taken is one of transparency and openness.
[Translation]
Mr. Gilles Duceppe (Laurier—Sainte-Marie, BQ): Mr. Speaker, HRDC
it will be recalled appointed Mr. Champagne, the lawyer of
Claude Gauthier, to be trustee of the $1.2 million grant to be
paid to the same Claude Gauthier once the Placeteco purchase had
been completed. In the light of these facts, the minister said
job creation was important.
Accordingly, how can the Minister of Human Resources Development
justify the fact that her department's grant to Placeteco was in
fact used by its new owner, Claude Gauthier, to pay off a
million dollar loan the company had with the National Bank?
[English]
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, let me repeat for the umpteenth time that
in these transitional jobs fund grants we are but one partner.
Over and over again it was the Government of Quebec that also
accepted and supported these programs.
[Translation]
Mr. Gilles Duceppe (Laurier—Sainte-Marie, BQ): Mr. Speaker, Human
Resources Development Canada and the Government of Canada are
administering and managing the funds.
A trust was set up, contrary to the opinion of Treasury Board.
The lawyer, Claude Gauthier, acted for the company and for the
trust, which seems normal to the minister. He is a friend of the
Prime Minister and this must be why. It is also contrary to
Treasury Board directives. Using $1 million to not create jobs
is irregular and abnormal.
Could the minister tell us if the reason is not because there
was pressure from the Prime Minister's office to help his
friends and pay back the National Bank with the money that was
supposed to be used to create jobs?
[English]
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, let me remind the hon. member yet again
that these undertakings were part of a partnership. They were
community economic development strategies that were supported by
the communities themselves, by the private sector, by the
Government of Quebec and in some small way by the Government of
Canada.
[Translation]
Mr. Paul Crête (Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup—Témiscouata—Les Basques,
BQ): Mr. Speaker, I want to continue with the Placeteco affair.
When Placeteco had placed itself under the protection of the
bankruptcy protection act, Mr. Gauthier purchased the company
for one dollar, with a commitment to invest $200,000 in it. Now
that we know where the first $1 million went, we are still
trying to find out about the other $200,000.
Can the minister tell us whether her department really knows
what this $200,000 was used for?
[English]
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, what I am glad to confirm again to the
House is this. Placeteco has just signed a three-year collective
agreement with its employees and it has signed a five-year
contract for $8 million with a major aeronautical company.
This partnership, which has been agreed to by the local
community with the Government of Quebec and with the federal
government, is creating jobs for people in a region of high
unemployment.
[Translation]
Mr. Paul Crête (Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup—Témiscouata—Les Basques,
BQ): Mr. Speaker, I am not all that surprised at the minister's
response. What became of the $200,000 is still not known.
Giving that kind of answers seems to be the only thing she knows
how to do.
Will the government finally initiate a public and independent
inquiry into all of her department's activities, or will she
launch a fourth RCMP investigation in the Prime Minister's
riding?
1425
[English]
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, again, as part of our undertakings we
have implemented a plan that will make a difference.
I want to remind the hon. member that the auditor general will
be completing a full review of grants and contributions in the
Department of Human Resources Development Canada. As an arm's
length agent of this body, I am sure the hon. member would
appreciate that he is the one who can best review and advise in
this regard.
* * *
HEALTH CARE
Ms. Alexa McDonough (Halifax, NDP): Mr. Speaker, my
question is for the Minister of Health.
Federal neglect and the NAFTA mean that Alberta's retreat into
two tier Americanized, privatized health care may soon be forced
on all Canadians. Why will the current health minister not stand
to be counted, as some previous health ministers are doing?
Why will the current health minister not just oppose Alberta's
health privatization law clearly and unequivocally? What is he
waiting for?
Hon. Allan Rock (Minister of Health, Lib.): Mr. Speaker,
as the member knows, we are looking at the legislation—and,
indeed, I would like to see the regulations as well—to determine
whether it complies with the Canada Health Act.
I was in Alberta last week and took the opportunity to say to
Albertans and all Canadians that we do not believe private, for
profit hospitals is the way to go. They are no less costly, they
have longer waiting lists and there are issues of quality.
We have urged the Alberta government to reconsider. Private,
for profit is not the answer to problems facing medicare.
[Translation]
Ms. Alexa McDonough (Halifax, NDP): Mr. Speaker, this is
unbelievable. Rome is burning, health is in crisis, and the
minister continues to fiddle.
Canadians do not want a two tier health system. Nor do they
want Americans to play doctor with their health. That is clear.
Is the minister going to follow the advice of his predecessors?
Is he going to clearly oppose privatization in Alberta?
[English]
Hon. Allan Rock (Minister of Health, Lib.): Mr. Speaker,
what I find puzzling is why the New Democratic Party will not
join with us in the work we are doing to renew medicare within
the principles of the Canada Health Act.
What the NDP governments of Saskatchewan, Manitoba and B.C. and
the federal NDP are doing instead are playing into the hands of
the Reform Party, those on the right who do not want the Canada
Health Act.
The real enemies of medicare are over there on the right in the
Reform Party. If they think those people are bad, wait until
they hear the views of Stockwell Day on the subject.
* * *
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Peter MacKay (Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough, PC):
Mr. Speaker, for months questions concerning the unprecedented
mismanagement of millions of taxpayer dollars have gone
unanswered in the House. The minister and Prime Minister have
taken pains to minimize the enormous case of fiscal
irresponsibility.
Almost daily now we have been advised of more RCMP
investigations. We know of at least 19 grants now currently
under investigation, three in the Prime Minister's riding, and
one where charges have been laid.
Will the minister now restore some faith in her department by
disclosing the full number of grants which she is aware of that
are under investigation, active, completed or pending?
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I have been as transparent as is
appropriate to the House with regard to this particular issue.
The hon. member knows that these issues are before the police
and therefore the question should be addressed to the police.
* * *
INDIAN AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Peter MacKay (Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough, PC):
Mr. Speaker, the minister is so transparent, we can see right
through her.
We know that there is systemic mismanagement present in other
government departments, such as CIDA and now Indian Affairs and
Northern Development. In 1971 the Prime Minister was the
minister of Indian affairs and he stated:
And yet, in an audit released while parliament was not sitting,
as expected, why is the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern
Development still doling out money to native chiefs if they are
refusing to account for their spending?
Hon. Robert D. Nault (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern
Development, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, that is not the policy and
it is not what we are doing.
* * *
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
Mrs. Diane Ablonczy (Calgary—Nose Hill, Ref.): Mr.
Speaker, the human resources minister told the House on February
7: “I am not trying to hide anything. I made the report
public”.
But new documents show the truth. Last fall the minister
deliberately chose not to make the audit public unless she was
forced to do so. How can the minister square her claim to
transparency with her choice of the so-called reactive strategy?
1430
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I counter it with fact.
The fact is, it is our department that made the audit public.
The fact is, it is our department that has provided over 10,000
pages of information to members of the House.
We have gone well beyond the most proactive strategy suggested
in what the hon. member is referring to. Quite frankly, that was
only a draft report.
Mrs. Diane Ablonczy (Calgary—Nose Hill, Ref.): Mr.
Speaker, the fact of the matter is that this so-called draft
report was an extensive plan which showed that in August the
department was ready, willing and able to release the audit.
Even the minister admits that she was finally clued in in
November, but it was only after an opposition access request in
January that the virtues of transparency suddenly became apparent
to the minister.
Why did she stick to the strategy of hiding the audit as long as
she could?
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I reject everything that the hon. member
has said. Her thesis is completely wrong.
I had the pleasure of going to Calgary last week and visiting
some very important projects which received grants and
contributions in the member's own backyard: programs to get
young prostitutes off the street, programs to help young people
who have not had the chance to get a full time job to get a job.
Perhaps since the hon. member will not go to visit those
programs she would come to my riding. She would understand then
why Mr. Marshall of Duchess Foods said: “I believe the attack
of the Reform Party is strictly based on political considerations
and not—”
The Speaker: The hon. member for Québec.
[Translation]
Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ): Mr. Speaker, Claude
Gauthier, the owner of Placeteco, told an official he did not
need to account to Human Resources Development Canada on what he
did with the $1.2 million grant.
What measures has the minister taken to get Claude Gauthier to
account not to the National Bank, not to lawyer Champagne, not
to the office of the Prime Minister, but to the Department of
Human Resources Development?
[English]
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, we have reviewed these projects on a
number of occasions in the House.
I reiterate that these projects have created employment for
people in areas of high unemployment. I reiterate that the
Government of Canada is but one partner in these projects and
that it was strongly supported by its kissing cousins in the
Government of Quebec.
[Translation]
Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ): Mr. Speaker, under
Treasury Board rules, once Placeteco came under the protection
of the Bankruptcy Act, the $1.2 million grant should have been
returned to Human Resources Development Canada, and not put in
trust.
How does the minister justify the grant to Claude Gauthier being
considered an inheritance rightly going to the new owner, who
bought Placeteco for a dollar?
[English]
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, again in the House we talked about the
issue of the trust funds. I made it clear that there was an
inappropriate administrative strategy undertaken by my
department. Those trust funds were closed. The programs are
still functioning and people are working.
Mr. Monte Solberg (Medicine Hat, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, a
while ago the Prime Minister said this whole affair was about
$251.50. “No big deal” he said.
Now this rot has spread to ACOA, Indian affairs and CIDA. Today
there are 19 separate police investigations, three in the Prime
Minister's riding alone, all over a missing $251.50.
That is the government's story. Is it sticking to it?
Hon. Herb Gray (Deputy Prime Minister, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, speaking of stories, the hon. member ought to get his
story straight because he is totally wrong in what he is
asserting.
The Prime Minister was talking about 37 cases that had been
referred for further inquiry. These arose out of the 459 in the
initial audit. He was talking about the information he had at
that time when he spoke about money that needed to be recovered.
He was totally correct when he spoke of $259, based on the
reviews that had been carried out, until that point, of the 37
cases.
Mr. Monte Solberg (Medicine Hat, Ref.): Mr. Speaker,
rumour has it that the Prime Minister recently got a parrot. The
only thing it can say so far is “Open up, it is the police”.
There are now 19—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
1435
The Speaker: Order, please. The hon. member for Medicine
Hat.
Mr. Monte Solberg: Mr. Speaker, there are now 19 police
investigations, three in the Prime Minister's riding. The
minister says she wants to be transparent. Here is her chance.
My question for the minister is: How many police investigations
are under way, how many have already taken place and how many are
pending?
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, with reference to the Department of Human
Resources Development Canada, I have been forthcoming with this
House. Other than the press release that was issued by my
department last Monday, things are as they have been.
* * *
[Translation]
CINAR
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron (Verchères—Les-Patriotes, BQ): Mr. Speaker,
we learned that, following the payment of royalties of close to
$1 million to Érika Alexandre, a fictitious name, a repayment
agreement was signed by CINAR and the Société des auteurs et
compositeurs dramatiques. Quebec authors are not pleased with
this agreement, far from it. Now, the revenue minister recently
suggested that CINAR might be able to avail itself of the
voluntary disclosure program.
Will the Minister of National Revenue, who is surely aware of
the sanctity of copyright and will therefore want to prevent
this whole matter from being discreetly stifled, pledge to
ensure that CINAR cannot avail itself of the voluntary
disclosure program?
Hon. Martin Cauchon (Minister of National Revenue and Secretary
of State (Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions
of Quebec), Lib.): Mr. Speaker, two weeks ago, when I was asked
about this issue, I said that when we are referring to a
specific case, namely CINAR, we must respect the fundamental
principle of Canadian taxation. The file at Revenue Canada—and
this is important for all taxpayers—is a confidential file.
As for the issue of voluntary disclosure, there is indeed a
voluntary disclosure program at Revenue Canada. As suggested by
its title, disclosure must be voluntary. I invite opposition
members to contact the department for more information on what
is a voluntary disclosure. They will find out.
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron (Verchères—Les-Patriotes, BQ): Mr. Speaker,
the Minister of National Revenue seems to be have been hit by
the same virus as his seatmate, the Minister of Human Resources
Development. He is hiding behind the argument of confidentiality
so as not to answer the questions from the opposition.
I will therefore direct my supplementary to the Minister of
Canadian Heritage. Given the scope of incriminating facts that
keep accumulating in the CINAR affair, what is the minister
waiting for to order a public, independent inquiry?
Hon. Sheila Copps (Minister of Canadian Heritage, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, the very first day that allegations were made, I went
straight to the RCMP. They are conducting the investigation.
* * *
[English]
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
Ms. Val Meredith (South Surrey—White Rock—Langley,
Ref.): Mr. Speaker, under access to information we received
an extensive communications plan developed by HRDC to handle the
release of the internal audit on the billion dollar boondoggle.
It includes strategic considerations, story lines, media
strategies and timelines. It was dated August 30, 1999.
After a week off to consider the facts, why is the minister
still spinning the same story?
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, because our story is the truth.
Ms. Val Meredith (South Surrey—White Rock—Langley,
Ref.): Mr. Speaker, the department-wide action plan in
August dealt with the controlled release of the internal audit if
an access to information request was received. Communication
plans talked about release strategies and the need to equip the
minister with questions and answers, question period cards and
media lines.
Does the minister honestly expect us to believe that she only
learned about this audit on November 17, as she stated in the
House?
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, let us review the facts again. This was
a draft communications plan. It is normal for the communications
officials in a department to prepare communication strategies.
This was being prepared and the audit was not even completed.
It was not forwarded to me and, as I have said earlier, I would
not have expected it to be.
[Translation]
Mr. Bernard Bigras (Rosemont, BQ): Mr. Speaker, on March 3, the
Minister of Human Resources Development received the report she
had commissioned from a Toronto firm in the matter of the
redirecting of a grant from the riding of Rosemont to the riding
of the Prime Minister.
How can the minister, who boasts of her clarity in this matter,
continue to refuse to make public this investigation, which was
paid for by the public and out of the public purse?
1440
[English]
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, the hon. member makes reference to the
Rosemont files. As he knows, on Monday last the department
issued a press release saying that this had been referred to the
RCMP. As such, the questions would be presented to them.
* * *
FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Ms. Jean Augustine (Etobicoke—Lakeshore, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, my question is for the Minister of Foreign Affairs.
The floods in Mozambique have taken their horrific toll in
recent weeks and now we have reports that heavy rains and
mudslides have displaced land mines in what is already one of the
most heavily land mined countries in the world.
What is Canada doing about this threat to the lives of so many
distressed people?
Hon. Lloyd Axworthy (Minister of Foreign Affairs, Lib.):
Mr. Speaker, I thank the hon. member for Etobicoke—Lakeshore for
raising this very crucial issue in the House.
It is absolutely true that added to the enormous suffering which
the people of Mozambique have experienced is the new danger
caused by the dislodgement of thousands of land mines which had
previously been demarcated or carefully mapped. What we now face
is an urgent request from the Mozambique Mine Action Centre for
help.
I am pleased to announce today, with the co-operation of the
Minister of National Defence and the Minister for International
Cooperation, that we are the first country to respond by adding
half a million dollars to the already $12 million we put into
mine action programs in Mozambique.
* * *
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Chuck Strahl (Fraser Valley, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, I
quote from a letter from the deputy minister of human resources
which says “Since June, when the interim audit report became
available, we have devoted intensive and sustained management
attention to this file”.
The minister claims that she was completely ignorant about the
interim audit, but we have to wonder what she thought everyone in
her department was actually doing during this period of
“intensive and sustained management attention”. Perhaps there
was an extended fire drill. Or, how about a 911 exercise? Maybe
there was a crisis management therapy session.
Either the minister did not have a clue what was going on in her
department or she has not been telling Canadians the whole story.
Which is it?
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, when I received the results of the
internal audit, without question I took them seriously. I
advised the department to strengthen its management report and
when the whole audit was completed we made it public.
The six point plan that we are now implementing, which has had
the benefit of advice from the auditor general, from outside
third parties, is being implemented. I have had the pleasure of
going to talk with departmental officials in Calgary and Toronto
and in other parts of the country and they are doing their job.
Mr. Chuck Strahl (Fraser Valley, Ref.): Mr. Speaker,
they may be doing their job, but it is the minister we are asking
about.
The communications plan and the strategy were ready to go in
August, but the minister waited until January to release the
information on the audit and only after she received an access to
information request. We have been giving the minister the
benefit of the doubt. We thought she was simply not up to the
job, but now we see something even worse. It appears she
followed a plan down to a t, which was to hunker down,
batten down the hatches and hope that no one asked about the
audit until it was old news.
Why did she try to hide the fact that she mismanaged $1 billion
in her department?
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, if the hon. member cared to pay attention
he would know that even the data collection for the audit was not
completed until the early part of the fall. He would understand
in the course of an internal audit that once the data is
collected the management team has to prepare the response. He
would understand that as minister, when I received this
information, I took it seriously and I said that the management
response was not strong enough. It was strengthened and when the
whole report was completed we chose to make it public.
* * *
HEALTH CARE
Ms. Judy Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North Centre, NDP): Mr.
Speaker, it is now day 10 since Ralph Klein launched the most
concerted and comprehensive attack on medicare in the history of
this country and the health minister says he is still studying
it. He says that they do not know what they are going to do at
this point.
One thing we do know is that this government paved the way for
privatization by signing a secret 12 point deal with Alberta in
1996, and went so far as to fire a former health minister for
trying to stop the deal.
The minister says he does not know what to do, but today he can
start by rescinding the deal and saying no to Ralph Klein. Will
he do that?
1445
Hon. Allan Rock (Minister of Health, Lib.): Mr. Speaker,
we know exactly what to do. It is to work with other governments
to renew medicare. That is exactly what we are doing with the
NDP governments of Manitoba, Saskatchewan and British Columbia.
We are working constructively to do things that will help. We do
not believe that private for profit hospitals are going to help.
The experience so far is that they have longer waiting lists and
higher costs and there are real questions about quality.
I would like to know why will the NDP not join in the effort to
renew medicare instead of aligning itself with those who would
destroy it?
Ms. Judy Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North Centre, NDP): Mr.
Speaker, first of all it is unbelievable that the government
after 10 days is in no position yet to say no to Ralph Klein and
the destruction of medicare. It is unbelievable that he pretends
that a deal his government signed in 1996 does not exist when in
fact section 11 of that deal is the forerunner to Bill 11 now
before the Alberta legislature.
If the government is serious about doing something about
medicare, it would rescind its own deal and say absolutely no to
Ralph Klein. Will the minister do it?
Hon. Allan Rock (Minister of Health, Lib.): Mr. Speaker,
that is unalloyed nonsense. There is no deal between
governments. There are principles that the Alberta government
proclaimed. They will not stand in the way of the enforcement of
the Canada Health Act.
The real issue is why is the NDP the defender of the status quo?
We want to work to renew medicare. It thinks that simply
pouring billions into the old system will work. It will not. Why
does it not join with us toward constructive change?
* * *
AGRICULTURE
Mr. Rick Borotsik (Brandon—Souris, PC): Mr. Speaker,
spring is just around the corner and right now many farmers are
trying to find cash to put the crop in. Many of them are not
being very successful.
The AIDA program has been like a mirage to a dying person.
Right now, today, only $500 million of that money has been
distributed and put into farmers' pockets.
Will the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food stand today and
admit that he has failed Canadian farmers for the 2000 crop year?
Hon. Lyle Vanclief (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I know the hon. member is a slow learner,
but the applications after the 1999 business year have to be
submitted by the farmers. As soon as those applications are
submitted, we will begin processing them so that the farmers can
get the cash.
Mr. Rick Borotsik (Brandon—Souris, PC): Mr. Speaker,
the slow learners come from that side of the House. Only $500
million has found its way to farmers' pockets. The crop has to
go in this spring.
Of the $500 million that has been distributed, $35 million went
to administer the program. Can the minister tell me why
bureaucrats and bean counters can get their money that quickly
but not our farmers?
Hon. Lyle Vanclief (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, farmers could have applied for an interim
application on their 1999 business year as far back as September,
last fall. Only about 500 or 600 of the farmers chose to do
that. The rest of them obviously have chosen to wait until they
finish their business year, their book work and paperwork as a
result of the 1999 business year and submit that. I can assure
the hon. member that as soon as they do submit those, we will
deal with those forms very quickly.
* * *
HEALTH CARE
Mr. Paul Szabo (Mississauga South, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, in
this year's budget the Government of Canada committed a further
$2.5 billion of health care transfers to the provinces. However
some of the provincial premiers have suggested that the
government is not doing its fair share.
Can the Minister of Health confirm to the House and to all
Canadians the actual level of financial support provided to our
health care system?
Hon. Allan Rock (Minister of Health, Lib.): Mr. Speaker,
over the last four budgets transfers to the provinces for health
have increased. The result is that overall transfers are higher
today than ever. Of the $60 billion spent every year on health
by governments in this country, $20 billion is spent by the
Government of Canada either directly or through the transfers to
the provinces. Some $20 billion of $60 billion is from Ottawa.
The truth is that of all public health spending in Canada this
year, fully one-third is contributed by the Government of Canada.
* * *
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Inky Mark (Dauphin—Swan River, Ref.): Mr. Speaker,
we have learned that a sock company in Quebec received $8.1
million under the transitional jobs fund in 1997. This is more
than what the entire province of Manitoba received, yet the
Minister of Human Resources Development stands up in the House
and says the program was about creating jobs in a fair manner.
When will the minister stop socking it to the Canadian taxpayers
and step down?
1450
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, let me again give the hon. member the
real facts. Indeed with Bas Iris the original plan was to be
worth $8.1 million but because of production losses the moneys
that were transferred were $5.9 million. In fact 1,400 jobs were
created, not only 1,400 jobs but an additional 40 jobs. This has
been an important industrial, economic and social advantage to
the area.
* * *
[Translation]
PUBLIC WORKS
Mr. Gilles Duceppe (Laurier—Sainte-Marie, BQ): Mr. Speaker, Public
Works Canada agreed to transfer a building to Inter-Loge, a
community group working in the field of social housing in my
riding.
The department was to completely clean up the site and is now
demanding that Inter-Loge finish the task at its own expense,
which it cannot afford to do. So now, the department is
threatening to take back the building and cause the group to
lose its deposit of $62,000.
I would ask the Minister of Public Works to tell us what is
happening in this matter and whether he has taken steps to
protect Inter-Loge from losing its deposit.
Hon. Alfonso Gagliano (Minister of Public Works and Government
Services, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I would begin by telling the
leader of the Bloc that there is no question of Inter-Loge's
losing its deposit. If the agreement, which has already
expired, cannot be renewed, negotiations will continue. Of
course, the group will get its deposit.
In the meantime, I have asked my officials to continue
negotiations, see if an agreement can be reached and come up
with a solution to this problem. The problem is complex because
the environmental impact is bigger than we first thought. So
the situation needs to be reassessed, but already good—
The Speaker: The member for Acadie—Bathurst.
* * *
GASOLINE PRICES
Mr. Yvon Godin (Acadie—Bathurst, NDP): Mr. Speaker, the price of
gasoline is at a ten-year high, and this is bad for Canada's
truckers and for Canadians in general. On Friday, the Minister
of Labour asked her colleague, the Minister of Natural
Resources, to do away with the federal tax on fuel.
Is the Minister of Natural Resources going to heed his colleague
and all of the people of Canada and show some leadership in
connection with the oil crisis?
[English]
Hon. Ralph E. Goodale (Minister of Natural Resources and
Minister responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, with respect to the issue of gasoline pricing, obviously
any issue related to taxation would need to be referred to the
Minister of Finance.
I think it would be important for the petroleum industry to take
note of the level of public concern and to be very transparent in
its pricing practices including the price of crude oil, the price
for refining, processing, wholesaling, retailing and taxes. I
think the public is entitled to know when those prices change,
exactly by how much and why.
* * *
[Translation]
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
Mr. André Harvey (Chicoutimi, PC): Mr. Speaker, my question is
not for the RCMP but for the Minister of Human Resources
Development.
In 1995, there was an agreement between Alcan, its labour
unions, and the provincial and federal governments. In recent
months, the federal government has decided to withdraw from the
program, while we are well aware that hundreds of jobs have been
created and the government is getting its money back in taxes.
I am asking the minister why, since this is a worthwhile
investment, she has pulled out of the partnership program with
Alcan and its unionized workers.
[English]
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I will take the hon. member's question
under advisement and apprise him of a response.
Mrs. Diane Ablonczy (Calgary—Nose Hill, Ref.): Mr.
Speaker, twice today the human resources minister told this House
that she made the audit public when it was completed. How does
this square with the facts?
The interim audit was available in June. The Liberals breathed
not a word of its explosive contents. The audit was formally
signed off in October. She asked the PCs to destroy that
evidence. The minister was briefed in November. She kept
telling the House all was well. We asked for the audit in
January and finally she becomes transparent. How can she stand
and tell Canadians—
The Speaker: The hon. Minister of Human Resources
Development.
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, again I must categorically reject the
assertions of the hon. member. Perhaps if instead of reading
interim draft reports members would read the final report, they
would see that we have taken this audit seriously. They would see
that we have a plan of action that is working. We are training
our employees. We have got a national auditing structure that is
going office by office and monitoring reports—
1455
The Speaker: The hon. member for Davenport.
* * *
THE ENVIRONMENT
Hon. Charles Caccia (Davenport, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, from
a recent publication by the Department of Natural Resources we
learn that the fossil fuel industry's greenhouse gas emissions
are increasing dramatically and will have grown by 64% by the
year 2010.
Can the Minister of Natural Resources inform the House when
Canada's national strategy will be ready and what he intends to
do about the fossil fuel industry's skyrocketing emissions?
Hon. Ralph E. Goodale (Minister of Natural Resources and
Minister responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, federal, provincial and territorial ministers of energy
and the environment will begin meetings later this month. They
will continue with meetings through this year on a national
implementation strategy with respect to climate change.
We hope by the end of this year to have made very real progress
in getting that strategy into place. What it might include could
be greater measures for energy efficiency, energy conservation,
energy diversification, more alternative and renewable fuels,
co-generation, district energy systems and cleaner industrial
processes. Underlying all of that is new technology. Our budget
most recently put $600 million into that very important effort.
* * *
[Translation]
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Yves Rocheleau (Trois-Rivières, BQ): Mr. Speaker, my question
is for the Minister of Human Resources Development.
Last week, the Prime Minister was in his riding. Since then,
everyone claims that he is as pure as the driven snow, even
though the RCMP is conducting at least three investigations in
his riding.
Out of solidarity with the Prime Minister, who seems to be in
deep trouble with this scandal, should the minister not
immediately order an independent public inquiry to protect him
from his political buddies in his riding?
[English]
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, again I would remind the hon. member that
the auditor general will be doing a study, a review, of the
grants and contributions in my department. I look forward to his
recommendations.
* * *
POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION
Ms. Libby Davies (Vancouver East, NDP): Mr. Speaker, even
the banks have walked away from the Canada student loans program
because even they recognize the mess of huge debts facing
students. Students are cheering that news. But the bad news is
unless the government addresses the root causes of this crisis,
debt loads will still be enormous.
Will the minister now commit to work with the provinces to lower
dangerously high tuition fees by restoring public funding that
put them up in the first place? Will the minister do that?
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, again I would remind the hon. member that
as of the most recent budget two weeks ago, an additional $2.5
billion has been made available to the provinces for health care
and education.
* * *
[Translation]
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
Mr. André Harvey (Chicoutimi, PC): Mr. Speaker, I can understand
why the minister would want to pause for a moment before
answering me. Does she realize that she said no to a project
that was profitable to the government, which was recovering its
investment through the creation of tens of jobs?
Does the minister agree with the principle of work sharing in
plants throughout the country, particularly in outlying regions?
[English]
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, again as I said earlier, I will look into
this project and provide an undertaking to the member.
Mrs. Diane Ablonczy (Calgary—Nose Hill, Ref.): Mr.
Speaker, I think the human resources minister should have one
more opportunity to explain why an audit which her department had
a whole plan to release at the end of August in fact was not
released until after an opposition access request in January. How
does that square with her claim of transparency? I invite the
minister to explain that.
Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Human Resources Development,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the opportunity to say again
to the hon. member that there was no access to information that
forced us to make the audit public.
I want to say that I have resented personally the accusations
that the member has made against me, calling me a liar outside of
the House, because she is wrong.
* * *
1500
PRIVILEGE
LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
The Speaker: I have notice of a question of privilege
from the hon. member for Surrey North. I read what he sent to me
today. I know he was busy this morning, but I rendered a
decision on a similar case. Did he have occasion to hear what
the decision was that I gave this morning?
Mr. Chuck Cadman (Surrey North, Ref.): Yes, I did, Mr.
Speaker.
The Speaker: Are you still going to raise a
question of privilege?
Mr. Chuck Cadman: Yes, Mr. Speaker.
As you know, I provided you with notice on March 3 of this
question of privilege. While my notice detailed much of the
concern, I believe that it is only appropriate that I outline the
issue in the House so that all members will be aware of the
present situation, as we are all equally affected by these recent
events.
I believe this question of privilege is related to one similar,
which was heard by the Speaker in October 1997. I say related
because the breach of my privileges as a member of parliament has
also arisen over the functions of our legislative drafters.
In 1997 you ruled that the matter be resolved by the Board of
Internal Economy. My issue does not concern the administrative
matters, such as the number of legislative drafters available to
assist us in our work, and it does not concern just who is
assigned to assist us in drafting legislation. My question of
privilege has solely to do with solicitor-client privilege and
breach of confidentiality.
First, I will relate the facts of the case. Over the past
number of weeks I have been dealing with our legislative
drafters on a number of amendments to legislation presently
before the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. The
drafting of legislation is one of the most important aspects of
this place. It is imperative that confidentiality of
information be maintained until each member decides to make his
or her work public by introducing it either in committee or here
at report stage.
Mr. Speaker, you can imagine my surprise and outrage
when I learned from the clerk of the Standing Committee on
Justice and Human Rights that he was in possession of my
amendments before I had even decided which of them I would be
introducing at committee.
I was informed that it has now been decided that
solicitor-client privilege does not attach itself to work
completed by our legislative drafters and that the material will
be made available to the clerks.
I do not know who else will have access to this work. I do know
that the clerk did seek my permission to release my proposed
amendments to the Department of Justice lawyers. I denied him
the permission to release them to anyone.
Let me make it clear that I do not call into question the
integrity of the clerk of the committee, but if he was able to
gain possession of my amendments, who else has them?
1505
It was my understanding that members of parliament are operating
with our legislative drafters in a solicitor-client relationship.
These drafters are lawyers who have been tasked by the House as a
whole to assist members in their legislative initiatives.
It is a competitive market in this place for political reasons,
for representing our constituents and for ensuring that our laws
effectively achieve what we as individuals perceive to be in the
best interests of the country.
You will remember, Mr. Speaker, how concerned members from all
political stripes became in October 1997 when the issue was
raised over the lack of sufficient and proper resources to
provide members with adequate legislative assistance. As I have
stated, my concern today is not an administrative function. It
goes to the essence of the relationship between our lawyers and
ourselves to fulfil our duties as members of parliament. These
lawyers work for us both on private members' legislation and on
amendments to government and Senate legislation. Without
protection of confidentiality, our parliamentary work is severely
impacted. We become disempowered from carrying out our duties.
This work was released to others without my consent, which I
believe is necessary under the law. Legislative counsel come
under the precinct of the Speaker of the House of Commons. It is
my understanding that they have been ordered to release this
information contrary to the protection of the solicitor-client
privilege.
To sum up, I believe that the release of confidential work in
progress to the clerk of the Standing Committee on Justice and
Human Rights without my consent is a prima facie case of
privilege. It has happened in my case and may well be happening
or could happen to almost anyone in this place. It must be
addressed. Should you find that a prima facie case of privilege
exists, Mr. Speaker, and with your permission, I would be
prepared to move the appropriate motion.
The Speaker: If I understand the hon. member
correctly, what he is saying is that there has been a breach of
confidentiality because the clerk of the committee had the
information.
I invite the hon. member to review my ruling of this morning.
With all due respect, I would suggest to him that the clerk of
the committee is a member of the team that has to work together
so that members can be served.
If the hon. member is saying that someone other than a person on
the team that I described this morning has access to the
information, I would like to know about it. But the team itself,
the drafters, the lawyers, the people who put it into the
information system, they are all part of that group. As for
anyone outside that group, if the hon. member is alleging that
someone else had that information, then I would like to hear more
about it.
I would like to review everything the hon. member has said
today. Barring anything that I have missed, my decision of this
morning, I believe, would apply. However, I will have a look at
it in detail to decide what is necessary.
I would like to let this matter sit at this point, unless
someone has something to offer which is in addition to what the
hon. member has said.
Mrs. Diane Ablonczy (Calgary—Nose Hill, Ref.): Mr.
Speaker, with respect, I think the point is something a bit
different from a team and who in the team has access to certain
information.
The point is solicitor-client privilege. The point is whether
we are entitled to rely on legislative counsel to work for us in
a privileged way. In other words, nobody else knows what we are
discussing, what we are planning or what we are doing because
these lawyers are giving us advice solely for our own purposes.
1510
If the clerks are getting this information, then it is on the
instructions of someone, Mr. Speaker, and that someone clearly is
not us, the members. That someone clearly is directing
legislative counsel to give information without our knowledge and
consent. In other words, these legislative counsel do not work
for us.
This even goes beyond solicitor-client privilege because if
legislative counsel are getting instructions and are following
orders from someone besides us, then how can we be confident that
they are doing their greatest and best work for us if their
responsibility is to someone else? This is very serious, Mr.
Speaker.
The Speaker: The hon. member reiterates a point that was
brought up earlier. The fact is that the legislative counsel,
the lawyers who are there, do not have in the traditional sense
the client-lawyer relationship only because there are other
people involved.
That has been the way. It has been our tradition since the
beginning. I would invite the hon. member to please have a look
at my ruling of this morning to understand why we arrived at this
decision.
* * *
[Translation]
POINTS OF ORDER
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS
Mr. Gilles Duceppe (Laurier-Sainte-Marie, Bloc Quebecois): Mr.
Speaker, I must inform you of an important decision that has
been reached by the members of the Bloc Quebecois, in connection
with this morning's decision.
We would have preferred not to have been forced to such a
decision, and I mean that most sincerely. It is, however, a
matter of democracy, as evidenced by the matter of privilege
that has just been raised. It is a matter of confidence.
In the next few minutes, therefore, I shall be introducing a
motion of censure of the Speaker of the House, which reads as
follows.
That this House resolve that it no longer has confidence in the
Speaker, since it is of the opinion that the Speaker exhibited
partiality in determining that the question of privilege raised
by the hon. member for Rimouski—Mitis on Wednesday, March 1, 2000
was out of order and in rejecting the point of order raised by
the hon. member for Beauharnois—Salaberry, to the detriment of
the rights and privileges of all of the members of this House.
I shall be tabling this motion in the next few minutes. I would
have preferred not to have had to do so. However, as I said,
our rights and our privileges are at stake, and so is democracy
and the confidence everyone must have in the Chair.
The Speaker: This is the first time in a long while that the
Speaker has had to deal with such a motion. The motion is out
of order at this time. The hon. member must give notice. He may
do so at his leisure.
ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
[English]
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS
Mr. Gar Knutson (Parliamentary Secretary to Prime Minister,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have
the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's
response to one petition.
* * *
1515
INTERPARLIAMENTARY DELEGATIONS
Mr. George Proud (Hillsborough, Lib.): Mr. Speaker,
pursuant to Standing Order 34(1) I have the honour to present to
the House in both official languages the fourth report of the
Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association which represented Canada
at the meetings of the defence and security committee held in
Washington, D.C. and southern California from February 1 to 8,
2000.
* * *
PARLIAMENT OF CANADA ACT
Mr. Peter Stoffer (Sackville—Musquodoboit Valley—Eastern
Shore, NDP) moved for leave to introduce Bill C-450, an act to
amend the Parliament of Canada Act.
He said: Mr. Speaker, it gives me great pleasure to present a
bill on behalf of constituents and Canadians right across the
country. It tries to prevent the merry-go-round that members of
parliament do once in a while when they decide to cross the floor
and join another political party.
I have never agreed that a member of parliament can just up and
leave a party and right in the middle of a term join another
political party. That decision should be in the hands of the
Canadian people. This legislation says to a member of parliament
that if he or she has a falling out with the party and wishes to
leave and join another political party, then step down, run in a
byelection under the new political banner and let the people in
the riding decide whether or not the member is capable of flying
under the new political banner.
It is a great privilege to thank the seconder of this wonderful
bill. I am sure the bill will sweep across the country and be
endorsed by all Canadians of all political stripes.
(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and
printed)
* * *
PETITIONS
YUGOSLAVIA
Ms. Val Meredith (South Surrey—White Rock—Langley,
Ref.): Mr. Speaker, I have two petitions to present on behalf
of my constituents and residents in British Columbia. The first
is a dated petition concerning the NATO actions in Yugoslavia
calling upon parliament to do what it felt was fair.
HIGHWAYS
Ms. Val Meredith (South Surrey—White Rock—Langley,
Ref.): Mr. Speaker, the second petition is one that I can
wholly support. It calls on parliament to provide more funding
for the national highway system in the 2000 budget. Unfortunately
they are a little bit late in expressing that sentiment. I
certainly think they are going in the right direction in asking
the government to provide more funding for the highways program.
PORNOGRAPHY
Mr. Lou Sekora (Port Moody—Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, today I present 277 signed ribbons from
the annual white ribbon against pornography campaign. This
campaign was held from October 24 to October 31, 1999 by the
Catholic Women's League of Canada. The use of pornography must
be stopped.
The Deputy Speaker: I assumed the hon. member was
presenting a petition and not ribbons to the House. I hope it
was a slip of words in his description because of course ribbons
would not be in order.
ACTION CANADA FOR POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Richard M. Harris (Prince George—Bulkley Valley,
Ref.): Mr. Speaker, it is my privilege to present four
petitions today.
The first one is a very important petition with several hundred
signatures from members of my riding. It says that whereas the
majority of Canadians consider unborn babies to be worthy of
protection and whereas Action Canada for Population—
The Deputy Speaker: Order. I know the hon. member will
want to comply with the rules and summarize the petition rather
than read it. I sense that we are hearing it read.
Mr. Richard M. Harris: Mr. Speaker, the petitioners pray
that the federal government will not continue to have ACPD, a
non-government organization that came directly out of the Planned
Parenthood Federation of Canada play a leading role in future
government sponsored forums on the national and international
scene.
CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
Mr. Richard M. Harris (Prince George—Bulkley Valley,
Ref.): Mr. Speaker, in the second petition the petitioners
pray that parliament use the section 33 notwithstanding clause if
necessary concerning the child pornography decision that is
coming down very shortly from the Supreme Court of Canada.
1520
REFUGEES
Mr. Richard M. Harris (Prince George—Bulkley Valley,
Ref.): Mr. Speaker, in the third petition several hundred
petitioners are concerned about mismanagement by the immigration
department. They pray that legislation will be enacted requiring
refugee claimants to demonstrate through identification and
documentation very clearly that they are fleeing general
political persecution and failing to do that face immediate
deportation without delay.
PENSIONS
Mr. Richard M. Harris (Prince George—Bulkley Valley,
Ref.): Mr. Speaker, the last petition contains several
hundred signatures of people who are really upset with the way
the government has scooped the pension plan surpluses from the
RCMP, the military and crown corporation agencies. They pray that
treasury board halt its unilateral appropriation of the surpluses
in the public service, military and RCMP pension plans. It
destroys the morale, the work ethic and confidence in the
government.
MAMMOGRAPHY
Mr. Ted McWhinney (Vancouver Quadra, Lib.): Mr. Speaker,
I have the pleasure to present a petition duly certified by the
clerk of petitions on the subject of breast cancer. The petition
is signed by 96 residents of British Columbia. It calls on
parliament to enact legislation to establish an independent body
to develop and implement mandatory mammography quality assurance
and quality control standards in Canada.
[Translation]
BILL C-20
Mr. Antoine Dubé (Lévis-et-Chutes-de-la-Chaudière, BQ): Mr. Speaker,
I would like to table one of the petitions given to me in the
last couple of days by people of my riding.
This petition concerns Bill C-20. The petitioners are calling for
the withdrawal of this bill, which violates the rights of the
Quebec people to decide their own future. I therefore table this
petition.
[English]
CHILD POVERTY
Mrs. Karen Redman (Kitchener Centre, Lib.): Mr. Speaker,
I am pleased to present petitions from the constituents in my
riding of Kitchener Centre.
The first set urges parliament to fulfill the 1989 promise to
end child poverty by the year 2000. The petitions have been
signed by the residents of the Kitchener—Waterloo area and the
members of Rockway Mennonite Church. Campaign 2000 has also
provided me with a copy of its petition calling on parliament to
end child poverty.
IMMIGRATION TAXES
Mrs. Karen Redman (Kitchener Centre, Lib.): Mr. Speaker,
the final petition is from the Mennonite Coalition for Refugee
Support. They call on the House to immediately rescind
immigration taxes on refugees and immigrants.
MARRIAGE
Mr. Eric Lowther (Calgary Centre, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, I
am presenting petitions with approximately 1,000 names of people
across the country including from Langley, Winnipeg and
Saskatchewan. They are petitioning that the House respect the
motion of nine months ago in defence of and to uphold marriage.
They are petitioning that in light of the fact that the Prime
Minister has limited debate on Bill C-23 and has not allowed a
free vote, that the House withdraw Bill C-23 and instead affirm
the opposite sex definition of marriage in legislation and ensure
that marriage is recognized as a unique institution both in name
and policy.
CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
Mr. John Bryden (Wentworth—Burlington, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, I have three petitions for you. The first is a petition
that asks parliament to take all measures necessary to ensure
that the possession of child pornography remains a criminal
offence. I think that is a reference to the supreme court debate
that is ongoing at this moment.
MAMMOGRAPHY
Mr. John Bryden (Wentworth—Burlington, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, the second petition calls upon the government to
implement, enforce and develop uniform and mandatory mammography
assurance and quality control standards in Canada.
CRIMINAL CODE
Mr. John Bryden (Wentworth—Burlington, Lib.): Finally,
Mr. Speaker, the last petition urges parliament to uphold section
43 of the criminal code which continues to give parents the right
or the opportunity to use appropriate discipline.
FUEL PRICES
Mr. Gurbax Singh Malhi (Bramalea—Gore—Malton—Springdale,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36 I have the
honour of presenting the following petitions.
The petitioners draw the attention of the House to the fact that
Canadian consumers are deeply affected by price hikes. Although
gasoline is a Canadian natural resource, Canadians have little
control over this important resource. Therefore, the petitioners
request that parliament encourage the establishment of a gas
pricing review commission to keep the pricing of gasoline and
other oil products in check.
IMMIGRATION TAXES
Mr. Gurbax Singh Malhi (Bramalea—Gore—Malton—Springdale,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36 I have the
honour of presenting these petitions signed by more than 100
concerned Canadians.
1525
The federal government imposes an immigration tax as a condition
for obtaining permanent residence in Canada. This tax is in
addition to the $500 charged just to open a file. Therefore the
petitioners call upon parliament to immediately cancel the
immigration tax.
Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36, the following
petition is signed by 46 interested Canadians.
The federal government imposes an immigration tax of $975. This
tax is discriminatory with respect to immigrants from developing
countries where the annual income is sometimes less than $975.
Therefore the petitioners call upon parliament to immediately
reduce the rate of the immigration tax.
CHILD POVERTY
Mr. Gurbax Singh Malhi (Bramalea—Gore—Malton—Springdale,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36, I have the
honour to present the following petition signed by 88 Canadians.
One in five Canadian children live in poverty. On November 14,
1989 the House of Commons resolved to end child poverty in Canada
by the year 2000. The petitioners call upon parliament to
introduce a multi-year plan to improve the well-being of Canadian
children.
MAMMOGRAPHY
Mr. Gurbax Singh Malhi (Bramalea—Gore—Malton—Springdale,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36, I have the
honour to present the following petition signed by a dozen
Canadians.
Canada has the second highest incidence of risk of cancer in the
world. It is second only to the United States. The United
States has had mandatory mammography quality assurance standards
since October 1994. Canada has no legislation for mandatory
mammography quality assurance standard.
Therefore the petitioners call upon parliament to enact
legislation to establish an independent governing body to
develop, implement and enforce uniform and mandatory mammography
quality assurance and quality control standards in Canada.
* * *
QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER
Mr. Gar Knutson (Parliamentary Secretary to Prime Minister,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, the following question will be answered
today: No. 76.
.[Text]
Question No. 76—Mr. Leon E. Benoit:
With regard to the groups consulted by the Minister of
Citizenship and Immigration in the course of the legislative
review ministerial consultations from February 27, 1998 through
to March 11, 1998: (a) which of the groups received government
issued grants and/or subsidies; (b) what was the total grant or
subsidy; (c) what was the reason for the grant or subsidy; and
(d) which government department issued the grant or subsidy?
Hon. Elinor Caplan (Minister of Citizenship and
Immigration, Lib.): With regard to each of the groups consulted
by the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration during the period
from February 27, 1998 through to March 11, 1998, the following
received contribution funds (Citizenship and Immigration Canada
CIC does not provide grants or subsidies to organizations) in
fiscal year 1997-98* under one or more of CIC's settlement
programs or services: immigrant settlement and adaptation
program, ISAP, which provides a variety of settlement services to
immigrants, such as orientation, community information,
interpretation/translation, para-professional counselling,
employment related sevices; language instruction for newcomers to
Canada, LINC, which provides traning in one of Canada's official
languages to adult immigrants; the host program which matches
immigrants to Canadians who help them with various aspects of
life in Canada; and reception house, RH, which provides temporary
accommodation to government assisted refugees.
Organizations in Quebec do not receive contribution funds from
CIC. As per the Canada-Quebec accord, the province of Quebec
assumes responsibility for providing settlement services.
*Contribution agreements are signed for a total amount which
covers the duration fo the agreement. As the period of time for
which the funding information was requested does not coincide
with the periods covered by the contribution agreements, we are
unable to give dollar figures for the exact period requested by
the hon. member.
[English]
The Deputy Speaker: The question enumerated by the hon.
parliamentary secretary has been answered.
* * *
STARRED QUESTIONS
Mr. Gar Knutson (Parliamentary Secretary to Prime Minister,
Lib.): Mr. Speaker, would you be so kind as to call Starred
Question No. 49, and I ask that it be printed in Hansard as
if read.
The Deputy Speaker: Is it agreed?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
.[Text]
*Question No. 49—Mr. Guy St-Julien:
Since 1990 have Natural Resources Canada, Environment Canada or
Atomic Energy Canada undertaken or had universities and/or other
Canadian university institutions undertake research or visits in
the province of Quebec north of the 48th parallel in connection
with pluton and/or granitic pluton with the aim of burying nuclear
waste and if so: (a) how many studies were done; (b) what are
the titles of the studies; (c) how many visits were there;
(d) what locations were visited; and (e) which Canadian
universities and university institutions were involved?
Mr. Gar Knutson (Parliamentary Secretary to Prime Minister,
Lib.): I am informed as follows. Environment Canada, Natural
Resources Canada and Atomic Energy of Canada Limited have not
undertaken any studies, research or visits in the province of
Quebec in connection with pluton and/or granitic pluton with the
aim of burying nuclear waste.
[English]
Mr. Gar Knutson: I ask, Mr. Speaker, that the remaining
questions be allowed to stand.
The Deputy Speaker: Is that agreed?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
GOVERNMENT ORDERS
[English]
AN ACT TO GIVE EFFECT TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR CLARITY AS SET
OUT IN THE OPINION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA IN THE QUEBEC
SECESSION REFERENCE
The House resumed consideration of Bill C-20, an act to give
effect to the requirement for clarity as set out in the opinion
of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Quebec secession reference,
as reported (without amendment) from the committee, and of the
motions in Group No. 1.
The Deputy Speaker: When the House
proceeded to question period the hon. member for
Waterloo—Wellington had the floor. He has five minutes
remaining in his allotted time.
Mr. Lynn Myers (Waterloo—Wellington, Lib.): Mr. Speaker,
I want to resume my debate on this very important bill, Bill
C-20.
I was talking about the kind of stalling tactics the Bloc
members are implementing on this very important and historic
bill. It saddens me. I heard the member for Quebec East call me
a liar while I was speaking. I suppose that is part and parcel
of where some of those people come from which is too bad. I do
not think it is appropriate. I think it is quite
unparliamentary.
I want to say in review it really is shameful when we see
something as important as this bill come forward that there are
now amendments to amendments being proposed. It is a shame that
300 press clippings were read in the House and 1,000 amendments
were proposed. It shows nothing but contempt not only for the
House but for the Canadian people wherever they live in this
great country of ours. It really is undemocratic.
For the record indicate I want to indicate that on December 13,
1999 the member for Beauharnois—Salaberry said that everything
they can do to slow down the bill to prevent its passage will be
done. That really is shameful. That is not what democracy in
Canada is all about.
1530
Let me say what the leader of the Bloc said not so very long ago
on February 7:
I can tell you that it's going to be a long process...very, very
long...The record was 471?....more than that.
The implication is that this is going to be stalled, this is
going to be dragged out, this is going to be extended, all at the
expense of democracy. That is unacceptable and that is not the
Canadian way. It is simply outright rubbish.
On February 8 the hon. member for Roberval said that there was
no way whatsoever that the Bloc would co-operate in passing Bill
C-20. Again, it is crystal clear where these people opposite are
coming from and that is in an undemocratic way to simply tie up
the business of the House, using every procedural trick in their
arsenal, when Canadians want to talk about other things. They
want to talk about jobs. They want to talk about trade issues.
They want to talk about globalization. They want to talk about
transportation in the west. They want to talk about farmers.
They want to talk about health care. They want to talk about
education. They do not want to get stalled by those people
opposite who want nothing more than to stall the business of the
House, to tie it up, to do whatever they can procedurally or any
other way to hog-tie the House of Commons.
We on the government side will not allow them to get away with
it. Why? Because it is not in the best interests of Canadians,
wherever they live in Canada. We on this side of the House will
ensure that does not happen.
That is why we are crystal clear when it comes to Group No. 1,
which we are debating today, which deals with the preamble. The
House should not forget that this is a very simple bill that has
three statements to it. It is very simple, very straightforward
and very uncomplicated. It is those people opposite who are
making it into something far greater than it was ever intended to
be, and that is unacceptable.
Let me remind you, Mr. Speaker, that the amendments in Group No.
1, which deal with the preamble, and now the amendments to the
amendments which they are proposing, simply go counter to what we
have in mind.
The bill closely reflects the decision of the Supreme Court of
Canada in the Quebec secession reference. Each of the
preambular clauses is drawn from elements of the court's
judgment. Despite the attempts of the Premier of Quebec, Mr.
Bouchard, to conveniently ignore certain parts of the judgment,
it is all important that all of its elements be reflected in the
clarity act preamble.
That is what we on the government side are doing. We are being
straightforward. We are being simple. We are being clear in
terms of what we are doing, because Canadians expect that kind of
common sense approach when it comes to government. Canadians
expect that of us. We are here elected from across Canada to
represent every region and every area of this country. No matter
where we come from, we are here to govern in an appropriate and
solid fashion, and we continue to do that. Why? Because it is
expected, it is required and it is necessary.
When we brought in as a government the clarity legislation, Bill
C-20, we did so with great intent, with great purpose, to ensure
that people throughout Canada, and the world for that matter, who
are watching this process will know that we come from a very
solid and straightforward foundation, knowing that this is a time
to act in a meaningful way on behalf of Canada. That is
precisely what we on the government side, with the help of the
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, will do.
Mr. Steve Mahoney (Mississauga West, Lib.): Mr. Speaker,
I, too, appreciate the opportunity to speak at least one last
time to this bill. It is a bill which attempts to bring clarity,
finally, to an issue that has probably been the most confusing
issue for Canadians right across the country, not only in the
province of Quebec but certainly in my riding and clearly from
sea to sea to sea.
Some of the statements made by members opposite I find rather
interesting. First, I heard the hyperbole of the member of the
New Democratic Party earlier today. In fact he was quite
apoplectic, to say the least, shouting and going on about the
fact that aboriginal Canadians are not named in the document—
1535
Mr. Peter Stoffer: He is right.
Mr. Steve Mahoney: I am trying to reiterate it fairly and
accurately because I want to point out the fallacy of the
argument.
The member could not understand and got awfully excited about
why we would not include aboriginal Canadians in the list of
people who should be consulted. I know the member knows this
full well because he is one of the most knowledgeable people in
the House. He has been around a long time. I give him credit
for his success in this parliament and the length of his stay
here, if nothing else. He knows that he could check the supreme
court decision with regard to this. I will share this with
members opposite.
The final subsection of the bill stipulates that no minister of
the crown shall propose a constitutional amendment to effect the
secession of a province from Canada unless the Government of
Canada has addressed, in its negotiations, the terms of secession
expressly mentioned by the court, such as the division of assets
and liabilities, any changes to the borders of the
province—which the hon. member knows full well deals with
aboriginal Canadians—the rights, interests and territorial
claims of the aboriginal peoples of Canada, and the protection of
minority rights.
That is in the supreme court decision. I read that and I
listened to the knowledgeable member of the New Democratic Party
going on about the government not mentioning aboriginal Canadians
in the bill. I wonder what has happened. I think I know. That
member and members of that party are looking for a reason to
oppose this bill. They are digging a little deep. They cannot
be kidding—
Mr. Peter Stoffer: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of
order. That is absolute nonsense. The member was pointing out
the fact that aboriginal people—and even the minister says that
is not true—
The Deputy Speaker: I think we are into a point of debate
rather than a point of order.
Mr. Steve Mahoney: Mr. Speaker, the member should seek an
opportunity to rise in debate in a normal way instead of jumping
up in such child-like fashion and interrupting the flow of
someone who is trying to articulate a point which might be
contrary to his and might be somewhat more factual. I am not
making it up; I am reading from a document that quotes the
supreme court.
If the member does not believe that the supreme court decision I
am reading is accurate, the member should say so, I suppose. But
I do not know where he would be coming from. What is the point
of that debate?
It could only be—and not to be unfair because there is really
another party I want to talk about a little more—that the NDP
has looked at this and said “Darn it, they really have something
here. They will put forward a bill that is clear to Canadians; a
question that is clear”.
Most of their ridings are in eastern Canada, in the maritimes.
I am sure the people in the maritimes are about as fed up with
this talk of separation as are the people of Quebec, Ontario, the
west and our territories. I am sure they are all sick and tired
of this whole debate and would like, once and for all, to put the
rules straight on the table.
The members look at it and say “Holy smoke, they might have
something here. They have actually put together a bill which
says there has to be a clear question, that the appropriate
democratically elected people in the country have to be consulted
and there has to be a clear majority”. Frankly, I think that is
what the majority of Canadians want, including those people in
Quebec.
In an attempt to find a way to oppose this bill, they have
latched on to the tried and true aboriginal issue. We saw that
in Charlottetown and in Meech. We came to recognize as a nation
that if we want to try to amend the constitution, which is
exactly what would be required under any attempt by a province to
secede, the country is not governable in that sense. To amend
the constitution of Canada is virtually impossible, to date at
least, with perhaps one or two very minor exceptions to do with
education, because any one person, as we saw in the Manitoba
legislature, can refuse unanimous consent and hold up the entire
country.
1540
Any premier can go back to the legislature of a province
promising to hold a vote, renege on that vote, and the whole
thing dies.
If a member wants to throw something into the mix, throw in the
tried and true aboriginal question and sure enough the process
will be derailed.
I do not understand where the responsibility lies for a Canadian
parliamentarian to do that. I do not mind that someone disagrees
with the bill. In fact I understand the Bloc members disagreeing
with it. It is their raison d'être to separate.
I found some of the statements of Bloc members really
interesting. Let me share one with the House. One Bloc member
said “You cannot judge clarity because there are language
differences”. Is that not an interesting situation.
I wrote out what I consider to be, and what I think my
constituents would consider to be, a clear question. It is
fairly simple and fairly straightforward. It states “Do you
wish to separate from Canada and become a sovereign nation, yes
or no?”
[Translation]
Here is the question in French: voulez-vous vous séparer du
Canada et devenir un pays souverain, oui ou non?
[English]
Where is the language difference? Where is the problem?
Members opposite do not like that question. Maybe they want a
question that says “Do you want to maybe separate? We will cut
a deal. We will see if we can get more money out of them. We
will see what we can do better for you because you voted for us.
Maybe we will get you some HRD grants, or maybe we will not.
What do you think of that, yes or no?”
If they want to play games because they know they cannot win
when it is a clear question, I understand that tactic, but I do
not think the rest of Canada appreciates that tactic.
Then I heard the same Bloc member say, and I found this to be
astounding, that his constituents do not want clarity, they want
money. That is what he said. They want money for economic
development and jobs. These are the same opposition members who
would stand to castigate the Minister of Human Resources
Development for investing in the province of Quebec, in the
various ridings of members opposite, and ridings right across
this country.
Those investments are investments in people, the people of
Quebec. The reason the members do not like them of course is
because they are afraid those investments might make, God forbid,
the country's government look good. That is not the reason it is
done. Our policies are very clear. We go into economically
depressed communities and we try to help them, because we
understand as a government that is part of our obligation.
I do not care what party sits on this side of the House, that
will always be, and should always be, part of the obligation of a
government which tries to run a nation with the disparities and
the geographical differences that exist in this country. Members
ought to travel this land, go to places in Quebec and Labrador.
Anywhere in this country they will see the need for government
assistance.
Finally, I heard a member stand to say that Quebecers were not
consulted when other people were allowed to join this country.
Presumably the member was referring to Newfoundland. I do not
understand that. I say to the member, what about the rest of
Canada when it comes to the province of Quebec voting on a
referendum question that would indeed destroy this country? Does
the ROC, the rest of Canada, not have something to say?
Mr. Richard Marceau: No.
Mr. Steve Mahoney: The member says no. I heard that. I
think they do and they want a clear answer.
My constituents have said to me that if they really want to go,
let them go. I want to make sure that the question is darn clear
before we are put in the position where we have to negotiate that
kind of deal. That is what this bill does.
I am a little frightened because Reform members support it, but
I appreciate the fact that they do so because they have listened
to their constituents.
The House should pass this bill, and quickly. It should be
passed so that we keep this country together and everyone
understands the nature of the game.
1545
[Translation]
Mr. Pierre de Savoye (Portneuf, BQ): Mr. Speaker, we are
debating a bill that nobody would have expected a responsible
democratic government to come up with.
I have tabled an amendment to delete from the bill a number of
the whereas clauses at the bottom of the first page. I would
like to say a few words about these clauses and explain why I
believe they should not be included in the bill. In fact, I
consider that the whole bill should have been withdrawn by the
government.
The first whereas that I would like to delete reads, and I
quote:
As you will note, the French version of this text is in the
negative, as it reads “ne saurait être considéré”. This is not
the way the supreme court worded its opinion. On the contrary,
it said in the affirmative that the question had to be clear and
that there had to be a majority in the qualitative sense of the
term, equally clear.
The legislation before us is not a clarity bill but legislation
on bad faith. I will explain why I believe this legislation
reeks of bad faith.
First, the clarity of a question does not depend on the length
of the sentence but on the way people perceive the issues behind
the question in relation to their own interests. A question can
be short or long, but the way people perceive their interests
depends on the conditions in which the debate occurs and on
whether each and every party will be allowed to express its
concerns in light of the issues behind the question.
In the 1995 referendum, the question was simple. It was this: Do
you want Quebec to become a sovereign state and to propose a
partnership with the rest of Canada?
This is a simple question that was debated not only during the
referendum period, which lasted one month, but also long before
that, considering that, in April 1995, during the Bloc Quebecois
convention, the notion of partnership was introduced. On June
12, 1995, the three parties, the Bloc Quebecois, the Parti
Quebecois and the Action démocratique, agreed on a basic
partnership proposal to be submitted to the rest of Canada,
should Quebecers vote for Quebec sovereignty.
Well, no one in this House or elsewhere claimed that the
question was not clear. Let me note that most people who claimed
that the question was not clear do not read French, and,
consequently, they simply repeated what they read in the papers
concerning the so-called lack of clarity of the question.
I think that, in Quebec, the question is so clear that the
majority of Quebecers would know the question referred to even
if all they saw on a sheet of paper was a yes and a no block.
The issue was debated even before I was born. Everyone knows
what is at stake.
1550
For many Quebecers, it is very clear that Quebec must acquire
all the powers needed to ensure the future it deserves.
However, some people think the House has the divine power to judge the
clarity of a question better than average Quebecers. I want to
point out to my colleagues, in all humility, that members of the
House are average citizens coming from their environment of
average citizens. On this side or the other side of the House,
we do not have supernatural brain power that would place us
above and beyond the people in our capacity to judge the clarity
of a question.
Average citizens know they are able to judge whether they have
understood the question and whether they agree or not with the
proposal made to them. Average Quebecers are as intelligent and
as capable of judging the clarity of a question as any member of
one side of the House or the other. That, through legislation,
this parliament should appropriate the almost divine right to
decide whether a question is clear or not, goes beyond the
abilities, the competency and the very right of the House to
democratically make decisions on behalf of the people.
When we call on the people, the people must have the last word
and, in a democracy, they have the last word. When the people
elect a member of parliament, they do not ask whether the member
is clear or not; they make a value judgment on the man or the
woman and take the decision to vote for him, for her or for
another person. When people read a question, they assess it in terms
of their interests and decide whether the proposal contained in the
question suits them or not.
This decision will not be taken by this House in place of the
people. We do not have the right to do so. If we did, we would
usurp the democratic right of each and every citizen. In that
regard, Bill C-20 clearly goes beyond the prerogatives of this
House. But there is even worse.
Through this bill, the House also wants to give itself the
right. When I say this House, the fact is that there are two
sides: the government side and the opposition side. The
government side outnumbers the opposition side, that is got to
form government in the first place. It always votes the same way
as the Prime Minister, because this is the way our Parliament
works. This bill enables, not this House, and not the government,
but the Prime Minister and him alone to determine the clarity of
a question and, worse yet, to determine the majority required to
win a vote for sovereignty.
In a democracy—at least this is what I was taught—each person has
an equal right to vote. My vote is not more important than the
vote of any other person, and nobody's vote is not more
important than mine. This is the basic principle of democracy.
Yet, this bill suggests that a vote could have more weight than
another one, which is totally unacceptable. That is why I intend
to now move a motion to amend Motion No. 2.
I move:
That Motion No. 2 be amended by adding, between the words
“were” and “consulted”, the word “democratically”.
Something this bill is seriously lacking. This amendment is
seconded by the hon. member for
Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok.
1555
The Deputy Speaker: The question is now on the amendment.
[English]
Mr. Ted McWhinney (Vancouver Quadra, Lib.): Mr. Speaker,
Bill C-20 has been charged by opposition members as being
arbitrary, a constitutional voie de fait, goodness knows what
other charges. This is very surprising. I will repeat what I
had the pleasure of saying in a public forum organized by the
member of parliament for Markham and presided over by ex-premier
Bob Rae, that the revolutionary aspect of this bill is that the
federal government by legislation voluntarily limits its
prerogative, executive powers.
There is no question that in 1980 when the first referendum
arose there was no right under constitutional law or
international law for a province unilaterally to secede. There
was no right at all.
The issue of what was a clear question and a clear majority, I
could remind the hon. member for Macleod who referred to this
earlier, was discussed very fully at that time, and it has been
around.
When the supreme court came into the picture it was because
there was a plethora of individual suits before individual judges
of the Canadian judicial system. The federal government had
several options. One was to challenge the constitutional
standing to sue of the individual litigants, which I think
technically, in legal terms, might have been the better course.
The other was to go ahead, and the supreme court has rendered an
advisory opinion, which is not of course legally binding on the
federal government.
What we have in Bill C-20 therefore is what European Union
jurists have rightly hailed as a rather surprising evolution in
the rules as to self-determination going well beyond the European
Union's own rules developed in 1992 for the special case of
eastern European states and the issue of recognition under
international law, which is of course one of the ways in which a
new state comes into existence.
What is interesting and surprising in Bill C-20 is that the
federal government, so far from imposing its will on other
people, is saying “We are prepared to recognize a right of
self-determination, to recognize it legally, but here are the
basic conditions. We want to be sure this is what people want.
What is the objection therefore to saying that we would require a
clear question and a clear majority before we go ahead with
this?”
In these terms it is very difficult to see what all the fuss is
about with this particular law. It takes nothing away from
anyone in Quebec or any other province. It is an example of the
federal government voluntarily limiting its own response and
saying “In the exercise of our prerogative powers in the future,
we will consider ourselves bound by the expression clearly given
of people of a particular province”.
I do have something to say, though, on a larger issue that has
been touched on by some of my colleagues and that is the nature
of the parliamentary processes. It is inconceivable that a bill
with a handful of sections, covering even in the French and English
versions a handful pages, should be the subject of I am
told, originally, 1,540 amendments. Now they are down to 400.
1600
Surely we are entering into an undergraduate game with
frivolous, repetitive or otherwise uninteresting and boring
propositions. Why should the business of the House be held up by
this sort of activity?
It is sometimes said that parliament is controlled by members
and that there are no limits on the control members can exercise.
People cite the parliament in Great Britain. You yourself, Mr.
Speaker, are a student of that parliament and you will know that
it has always been a very robust parliament. You will remember
that Oliver Cromwell said to parliament, “You gentlemen have
been around too long for all the good you have done. Go, for the
sake of God, go”. It is recorded that not a dog barked at their
departure which was gently assisted by Oliver Cromwell's friends.
What I am really saying is that it is a necessary part of the
parliamentary process that the rules of the game are observed. We
can have a tyranny of a majority but we can also have a tyranny
of a minority. The British parliament has never hesitated to
establish rules that ensure respect by all parties, majority and
minority, for the rules of the game and for the ability of
parliament to conduct the national business.
In the United States those of us who are old enough will
remember Jimmy Stewart, the senator who could speak for 22 hours
uselessly on a bill, but the United States congress has now
regulated that power. There is a basic criticism of the
parliament in Germany in the 1920s, a democratic regime that did
nothing about the forces of evil of the right or the left in that
situation. The German democracy collapsed as much from the
inanition of parliament in exercising its powers to control the
abusive use of parliamentary procedures as by the extremist
forces outside.
I am really saying to members of the opposition that surely the
points have been well established in debate. What is achieved by
wasting the time of the people of Canada, wasting the time of
citizens who are expecting us to act on important bills? Has the
point that opposition members have been trying to make not been
made adequately enough in the debate?
I have no doubt therefore that we will be forced as
parliamentarians to consider proper rules to engage the orderly
conduct of House business.
One of the ideas whose time has certainly come is electronic
voting, the United Nations system. I think those of us who like
the happy ritual of elevating oneself and sitting down again and
think it is a quaint old fashioned custom are having doubts about
it. It is an idea that perhaps may go very quickly through the
House, as well as the ability to establish new rules that ensure
no one will be able to make an abusive use of parliamentary
procedures. That is a tyranny of a minority carried out
incessantly and carried out without proper respect for
parliamentary customs and procedures. It can in my view be
dangerous to the constitutional system that we all respect.
Parliament is an ancient institution, but is also an institution
of mutual respect that rests on a delicate system of checks and
balances respected by all members. I would suggest to the
members opposite that the Reform Party made the point with the
Nisga'a treaty what can be done with parliamentary procedures.
As a distinguished Reform member said to me yesterday, stated
once it is interesting, stated twice it becomes boring. However
it does direct attention to the fact that the pre-emptive concern
with sovereignty association issues has been at the expense of
this parliament's considering the modernizing and updating of
parliamentary procedures. It is long overdue that we bring
parliament into the 21st century. Decent rules that assure
proper respect for other members' rights are part of that.
1605
[Translation]
Mr. John Bryden (Wentworth—Burlington, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, first
of all, I would like to say that I do not agree with my
colleagues from Waterloo—Wellington and Vancouver Quadra when
they say that the members of the Bloc are immobilizing
parliament with their amendments. I think that it is very
important for the opposition to be able to protest when they do
not agree with a bill introduced by the government. If the Bloc
members want to see the MP vote like little rabbits, jumping
from on amendment to another, that is fine. That is stupid, but
that is fine. If that is what they want, I have no problem with
that.
I believe most of the amendments moved at this stage of
consideration of the bill are futile. I would like to explain
why.
Bill C-20 is very simple. There are two fundamental paragraphs
that form the basis of this bill. The rest is only cosmetic. The
two paragraphs that I consider important are 1(6) and 2(4).
Paragraph 1(6) reads as follows:
(6) The Government of Canada shall not enter into negotiations on
the terms on which a province might cease to be part of Canada
if the House of Commons determines...that a referendum question
is not clear—
The other paragraph says the same thing, and I quote:
(4) The Government of Canada shall not enter into negotiations
on the terms on which a province might cease to be part of
Canada unless the House of Commons determines...that there has
been a clear expression of a will by a clear majority of the
population of that province that the province cease to be part
of Canada.
This is what is required to start negotiations on the separation
or secession of a province.
I am a strong federalist. I think my colleagues from the Bloc
defend everything coming from Quebec. I think opposition members
believe, as I do, in a civil society.
Consequently, I believe my colleagues opposite are not looking
for a situation where Canada would be dismantled by an unclear
question. I believe this because I firmly believe in a united
Canada. I also believe in the parliamentary process, as other
members opposite, Reform and Bloc members. If there were a clear
question on the secession of a province, I would have no choice
but to accept it.
Mr. Daniel Turp: Fifty per cent plus one, like Mr. Mills.
Mr. John Bryden: No. The situation with this bill is very
simple.
1610
I do not think all members of the Bloc are separatists. Most are
sovereignists or perhaps indépendantistes, but they are not
separatists.
In Quebec, some separatists are looking for winning conditions.
I think that two winning conditions are a confusing question and
a majority of 50% plus one.
We have two parties in the House that go along with that. The
Conservative Party thinks a confusing question is all right, and
the Reform Party led by Mr. Manning says that 50% plus one is
enough to break up Canada.
The Liberal government will not last forever, and it is
unfortunate. Eventually, Reformers or Conservatives may form the
government. I think Preston Manning, and perhaps Joe Clark also,
could impose party discipline with a great deal of authority. In
that case, the Reform leader would be able to impose the majority
of 50% plus one. Perhaps the Conservative leader would accept an
unclear question to get negotiations underway—
[English]
Mr. Richard M. Harris: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of
order. I know it was probably just a slip of the tongue but the
member did mention the Leader of the Official Opposition by name.
I know he did not mean to and that he would withdraw it.
The Deputy Speaker: I am sure he would not mind. I am
sorry, I missed hearing the name but the hon. member for
Wentworth—Burlington will not, I am sure, want to allow that to
continue.
[Translation]
Mr. John Bryden: Excuse me, Mr. Speaker. I was under the
impression that the Reform leader had resigned his position.
The winning condition is simply to have a Reform leader, a
Canadian Alliance leader, or a Conservative leader as government
leader. These are winning conditions for the separatists.
Bill C-20 prevents this possibility by conferring the power to
determine if the question is clear, and if the majority is clear
on that question. It confers such power to all members of the
House of Commons. It creates a sensitive situation with respect
to the question initiating negotiations for the break-up of the
country. This responsibility is vested in all members, who would
participate in some kind of a free vote. I think that most
members of this House, including Bloc members, will vote
according to their conscience.
For these reasons, I think that this bill is good as it takes
the power of the executive and gives it to the members of this
House.
I think this is true democracy.
1615
[English]
Mr. Claude Bachand (Saint-Jean, BQ): Mr. Speaker, first,
I would like to congratulate my hon. colleague for the quality of
his French. I have known him for four or five years and his
French is improving. I would like to tell him also that I hope
with his learning French and understanding Quebecers that in a
few months he will change his mind and vote in favour of the
sovereignty of Quebec. Let us hope so.
[Translation]
I am glad to be able to speak today to Bill C-20, however
difficult it may be for us in this House to convince people.
I followed closely the dynamics that developed since the
introduction of the bill before Christmas and, like great
philosophers, I like to ask myself questions.
The first question I asked myself was why? Why want to trap
Quebecers in the status quo? Then, I told myself I had to try to
identify the interests of the party in power.
Not only did the Liberal Party introduce legislation that is
undemocratic, but it trampled several democratic rules that I
want to address in my remarks.
I came to the conclusion that the interests of the Liberal
government are quite simple: it is interested in Quebec because
Quebec sends a lot of tax money to Ottawa and that must not
change. I found a few examples, and what is going on here in
Ottawa is best described as misappropriation of Quebecers' money.
In fact, taking into account several issues over the years—I was
first elected in 1993—I believe that the government wants to keep
Quebec in Canada because it is profitable for the government. It
is not profitable for Quebecers or it is far less profitable for
them, but for Canadians and the rest of Canada, for example, the
motto is “Let us keep Quebec in Canada and, if need be, let us
lock it up in Canada”. At least I believe this is what the
government is trying to do.
For instance, and this is one example among many, let us look at
the issue of GST harmonization. Not long ago, as members will
remember, the government said “We will scrap the GST”. As soon
as they were elected, they said “No, we will keep it”. Moreover,
they tried to convince all the provinces to harmonize their
taxes with the federal GST.
The Atlantic provinces, for example, received $1 billion for the
harmonization of their taxes with the GST.
Quebec was the first province to say to the federal government
“Listen, you are giving compensation to the Atlantic provinces,
so, give us compensation too”. We were asking $2.5 billion. And
the federal government stubbornly said “No, you are not entitled
to this”. They said to themselves “Let us keep Quebecers and
Quebec in Canada, because it is to our advantage. We can
compensate the other provinces, but let us forget about Quebec”.
I remind the House that it was even suggested that an
arbitration board could be set up between representatives of the
federal government and Quebec arbitrate on this issue, and the
federal government said no.
Other examples come to mind, such as the Canada social transfer.
The value scale of the Canada social transfer has always been
based mainly on the wealth or poverty of the provinces or the
regions. The government changed all that.
Now it is just the demographic factor that counts, meaning that
Quebecers have lost a lot of money, because Ontario is the
largest province in demographic terms. It is the one getting
the big chunk of federal money in the Canada social transfer.
Another injustice for Quebec. “Let us keep Quebec, it is very
important to us. We can limit transfers, give a little more to
the others and enclose Quebec in Canada. This is what we want,
because it is to our advantage”. The question is always the
same: what are the interests and why this bill?
Another example is Public Works Canada. No more than two weeks
ago, the statistics came down: Quebecers contribute 25% of the
cost of all the departments, including Public Works Canada.
Yet 57% of contracts go to Ontario and 13% to Quebec. “We have
to keep Quebec in Canada, because it is a cash cow”. Quebecers
pay full taxes to Ottawa, 25% of the tax base, but they are not
given the equivalent.
They have to be imprisoned in Canada.
1620
There is an annual $2 billion shortfall in Quebec. Then they
tell us that Quebec does not know how to manage, that it has a
huge debt, that it always has deficits, that the federal
government has put itself in a good position and that now there
is no deficit. We can understand why. I am giving examples of
instances where Quebecers are continually shortchanged in
Canada.
Quebecers continue to contribute 25% of the tax base for
National Defence, but only 18% of spending goes to Quebec and
only 16% of the infrastructures are in Quebec. Another shortfall.
Some even talk about a shortfall of 5,000 Quebecers in the
military. An additional 5,000 Quebecers in the labour force
would have a significant impact on the economy. Again, the
federal government ignores this because it wants to keep Quebec
a prisoner in the Canadian federation.
These days, we hear a lot about the price of gas. I want to tell
Quebecers who are listening that, for at least 15 years now,
they have been paying 3 to 10 cents more than Ontarians for gas.
Why? Because the government of the time decided that no
subsidies would be paid to refineries located east of the Borden
line. That decision automatically triggered a 3 to 10 cent
increase at the pump in Quebec. Incidentally, three refineries
in eastern Montreal have since shut down. The hon. member for
Hochelaga—Maisonneuve is well aware of this. It happened almost
in his riding.
Mr. Réal Ménard: In the riding of Mercier.
Mr. Claude Bachand: Canada wants to create health research
institutes. Let us talk about research institutes. Out of 43
research institutes in the national capital region, 42 are
located in Ottawa and one is in Hull. And it is Quebecers' taxes
that pay for this. Twenty five per cent of these institutes are
paid for by Quebecers who, in return, only get one of them out
of 43.
Research institutes are important. Contracts are awarded, well
paid jobs are created and subcontracts help generate economic
spin-offs. But no “Let us keep Quebec a prisoner within Canada.
We want the taxes paid by Quebecers. We are not interested in
giving them back services”.
At one point, Quebecers told themselves “Let us try to correct
things. Let us make reforms”. In 1982, the Constitution was
unilaterally imposed by Ottawa.
No Premier of Quebec, either sovereignist or federalist, has
ever agreed to sign it as things now stand. It was tried with
the Meech Lake agreement, where we put forward five little
minimum conditions. We were turned down. As for the
Charlottetown accord, the rest of Canada said no and so did we.
We considered that we did not have enough power and the rest of
Canada considered that it was giving us too much.
Now what is this bill trying to do? It is trying to trap Quebec
within the Canadian federation. After accusing the Liberals of
diverting money belonging to the Quebec people, I accuse them of
hijacking democracy because we have seen closure after closure
with this bill, and a bold and unacceptable attempt by the
government to restrict the number of amendments that the members
could move, allowing ministers to move more.
It is a good thing the opposition held together and managed to
thwart these plans, but it will not prevent the government from
trying to impose all its wishes on us, like closure to limit
debate. We are told that we will be voting like little rabbits;
this is what I understood a little earlier from one of my
colleagues. What is this? Are we acting in a undemocratic way
when we vote laws in the federal parliament the way we have been
doing over the last hundred years?
There is a limit. And it is not a question of money. The only
thing we can do is a little bit of parliamentary resistance as
far as the votes are concerned, and we are even blamed for that
too.
This is to show how the government intends to keep Quebec in the
prison of confederation. The bill is quite undemocratic.
Since when is 50% plus one not acceptable? Canada itself has
recognized referendums that took place in Croatia and in
Macedonia, where the 50% plus one rule applied.
1625
Furthermore, the question had two components, one of which was
on partnership. Now, the government tells us “No, there will not
be any partnership. We will examine this in the House of
Commons, in our great paternalistic wisdom toward Quebec. We
will examine whether your question is clear enough”.
I want to say one thing. There is no single prison that will
keep Quebecers in this federation when they decide enough is
enough. There are not enough locks in all the Ottawa region to
keep all Quebecers within the Canadian federation when they
decide enough is enough. There is no prison that is tight enough
to keep them inside forever.
Quebec sovereignty is the only solution, with a partnership
offer, and I hope Quebecers will understand this. I also hope
that Canada will be open to this idea at that time. It is not
with bills such as this one that the government can ensure
Quebec will stay within the Canadian federation; on the
contrary, when it decides to leave, nothing will stop it.
[English]
Mr. John McKay (Scarborough East, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I
appreciate the opportunity to speak to this important issue.
There is no greater issue that any member would address than the
dissolution of his or her country. I am in somewhat of an ironic
position because in the riding of Scarborough East, where I come
from, this is, frankly, not an issue.
One would have thought or anticipated that the dissolution of
one's country would have been of extreme interest to citizens of
my riding, that constituents would have spoken to me, or would
have sent e-mails, faxes, letters, et cetera. Quite to the
contrary, if I could characterize it as such, this is an issue
that has almost fallen off the political map. In some respects
my constituents see this as a done deal and they thank goodness
that somebody has introduced some sanity into the debate.
There is an irony. This is an enormous issue. It is a very
significant issue on which the Minister of Intergovernmental
Affairs gave probably one of the finest speeches that the House
has heard in a number of years, and yet there is no political
resonance in my community.
I have just spent a week in my riding, as did all members. What
I heard were issues around Bill C-23. I heard about gas prices,
as if I am somehow able to deal in some manner with gas prices.
Health care is a significant issue to my constituents. I think
those are probably the top three issues. I cannot recall anyone
in the past week or 10 days writing to me, faxing me or e-mailing
me about this issue. It is enormously ironic that arguably the
most significant bill which the government will pass in its
mandate has almost no response from my own constituents.
When this bill was introduced by the government there was an
initial sense of euphoria. Finally the Government of Canada was
getting on with it. Finally somebody was going to do something
concrete, something decisive, something that will bring closure
to this issue, this interminable debate of our national dream.
The message I got from my constituents was pretty vocal. First,
they liked it. They thought this was a great bill. Second, get
on with it. Just do it. I cannot phrase it any more bluntly
than that. The message was, bring clarity to this debate.
Finish it. Deal with it and move on.
The tactics in this debate are hugely ironic. Bloc members, for
their own reasons, and I am still at a loss to understand them,
choose to take tactics of delay and obfuscation, introducing
meaningless amendments and reading newspaper articles into the
record.
It does everything but deal with the issue and is quite reluctant
to accept the political judgment of Canadians on this matter.
1630
Instead of dealing with what I perceive to be the political
reality of not only my constituency but Canada and all Canadians
including Quebec, which is that this is something that needs to
be done, the Bloc's tactic in this matter is to delay and to
waste parliamentary time.
I have listened to the members opposite. I have some
understanding of their issue. They consider this to be a
unilateral decision which is something that is available to
Quebecers and Quebecers only. That position has been debated and
frankly they have lost the debate. After that there has been
nothing of substance added to the debate.
I have some expectation given the philosophical position of the
Bloc that it would not really care what the constituents of
Scarborough East, Ontario or the rest of Canada thought, but I
would have thought it had some interest in what other Quebecers
thought. What I understand to be the situation is that the
political reality in Quebec is much similar to the political
reality of Scarborough East which is to get on with it, deal with
it and finish it off.
The position of the Bloc to my mind is unfathomable. I do not
understand. It does seem to me that this has become a
discredited political philosophy. Members opposite are unwilling
to accept that this has become a discredited political
philosophy, that they are in the death throes.
We get ironical statements by members such as the member who
spoke previous to me about how Quebec is being ripped off in its
relationship to the rest of Canada. He quotes a number of
examples where apparently research and development is done on one
side of the Ottawa River as opposed to the other side of the
river, et cetera. He neatly forgets the equalization payments of
something in excess of $4 billion on an annual basis. Any
studies I have ever read on the issue have said that Quebec does
very well in its relationship with Canada.
I cannot quite fathom what they are against. I looked up the
speech of the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs. I thought it
was one of the better speeches given in the House in a long time.
He said in his conclusion that the bill is reasonable, that it is
in everybody's interests including those of his fellow Quebecers
who desire independence. They can and must acknowledge that
their plans for political independence can only be realized in
clarity and legality. To act otherwise is to try to reach
independence through ambiguity with no legal safety net, is to
show disrespect for Quebecers and to doom the independence
initiative to failure, to an impasse that would be disappointing
and costly for everyone. I adopt the reasoning of the Minister of
Intergovernmental Affairs and I think he said it well.
I find the tactics of the Bloc to be quite disappointing.
Raising irrelevant amendments and matters of procedure, slowing
down the work of the House ending up in endless picayune
discussions as to whether a comma should go here or there is a
great disservice to what was and is a noble cause, namely the
issue of whether Quebec is or is not a nation. To my mind it
does no great service to the dream of René Lévesque and all those
who have spoken so eloquently in favour of the position.
1635
It appears to me that the Bloc members are reluctant to accept a
democratic result. They simply will not accept it. Again I go
back to the speech of the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs.
It states, “In this matter the separatist leaders do not defend
the rights of Quebecers. None of our rights as Quebecers are
threatened in this bill. Quite the contrary, no one in this
country wants to keep Quebecers against their will. No. What the
separatist leaders defend is their capacity to maintain confusion
on their project. They are upholding their so-called right to
confusion”.
I was not aware that a right to confusion was in fact a charter
or parliamentary right but I suppose this is something we will
have to look at. The tactics bring parliament into disrepute.
This is the kind of stuff that makes Canadians say that
parliament has outlived its usefulness, that it is only
marginally relevant. It tends to diminish parliament in the eyes
of my constituents and of other Canadians.
In summary, my constituents want this bill to pass. My
constituents believe that the time has passed for this endless
discussion. My constituents want clarity.
[Translation]
Mr. René Canuel (Matapédia—Matane, BQ): Mr. Speaker, I have
listened to my colleague had to say and I see more and more that
there are two entities in Canada: his and that of men and women
in Quebec.
I had prepared something for the year 2000, something that could
give hope to the Matapédia—Matane people et to all Quebecers.
The inaugural magic of great moments is difficult to conjure up
for the humanity. As a magic date, a mythical passage, the
arrival of year 2000 created a lot of hope in all our hearts.
Many were disappointed, especially since the introduction in
this House of Bill C-20.
Like the whole of humanity, Quebecers entered the third
millennium with a lot of hope and expectations.
On the eve of year 2000, the people had the feeling, the belief
that things could now be better. It was even said “Peace and
goodwill to all”.
With the minister's Bill C-20, the government
cast darkness over that environment. This minister could be
called the “son of darkness”, it is incredible how poorly he
understands Quebec reality. Once in a while, legislation can be
considered a comedy, but if I had to describe this one, I would
have to say it is a terrible tragedy.
People on the other side should have a hand dog look tonight.
But that is not the case; they are smiling and saying this is a
good piece of legislation for Quebec. If by their fruits you
shall know them, then—
Mr. Réal Ménard: They are rotten.
Mr. René Canuel: Yes, they are poisoned. We must judge a
government, and especially the minister, by its legislation.
This minister is arrogant and his legislation is provocative.
Furthermore, Bill C-20 is an insult to and a crime against
intelligence.
It more or less tells the members of the National Assembly “You
are not bright enough, not intelligent enough to determine your
own destiny. Mr. Bouchard, Mr. Charest, Mr. Dumont, you are
three minus habens. You are waterboys, second class politicians
or, as Trudeau told Bourassa, hot dog eaters”. That is what
Trudeau said.
1640
Moreover, it is an insult to and a crime against freedom. My
adolescent students used to say “We are free”. They were right.
I imagine that Quebecers are quite capable of freely making
their own choices. Bill C-20 says the question must meet such
and such requirements. Any other question will be considered as
ambiguous. Is that freedom? Is that the extent to which
freedom can be exercised in this Parliament?
The federal government's judgment can supersede Quebec's
judgment. As my colleagues said earlier, Bill C-20 is
undemocratic. In 1980, the federalists won with 50% of the
votes plus one; they were happy and they celebrated with
champagne.
In 1995, the federalists won with 50% plus one, and they really
brought out the champagne. However, at the next referendum, if
we win with 50% plus one, that would not be enough. According to
the Prime Minister, such a result could not be recognized. The
rules have changed somehow.
I have always admired Mr. Ryan who, many years ago, was the
editor in chief of Le Devoir and has also been the Leader of the
Opposition in Quebec. He is a remarkable man. He said he would
recognize these rules. Joe Clark, a former Prime Minister, said
the same thing in this House.
What is going on here is that they are using their strength to
crush a whole people, the Quebec people. Never will the people of
my riding, the people of the riding of my colleague from
Charlevoix, whom I had the honour to meet twice, and the Quebec
people as a whole go for such legislation.
Ottawa's bill is not only abusive, it is unjust. Its proponents
are acting with the arrogance of conquerors. Those who support
them are serving a cause or purpose. What cause or purpose? To
eradicate anything that makes possible the existence and the
expression of a people that the constitutional order of the
Canadian society obstinately refuses to recognize.
We, in the regions, are fed up with a government, which, instead
of trying to settle real problems and create jobs, is attacking
our government, the government of Quebec and those who are truly
elected by the people.
This government dares to dictate our conduct. That is something
that no one can or will accept.
We find the dirty tricks of the present Liberal government pretty
tiring. Even the Liberal MPs from Quebec, and that is what is
sad and unacceptable, fail to understand and are not attuned to
their constituents. I can understand this in the case of those
representing anglophone ridings, but the member representing
Bellechasse—Etchemins—Montmagny—L'Islet should have ears to
hear what his fellow citizens are saying. After the next
election, he will no longer be around. It is perfectly clear,
because people with freedom at heart, people who understand what
Quebec wants, will definitely show their MP the door, minister or
not. And they will not be ushering him out an emergency exit for
his safety, but booting him out the front door.
1645
There is no way to ignore the sour note on which this past
century and this past millennium came to an end. If the Quebec
people were to bow to the yoke of Bill C-20, it would be a sign
that we had been tamed. We would be just like the domestic
animals on the farm to serve humans. I trust that my friends
across the floor will understand, and I will offer a quick
summary.
If the people across the way want to put up fences, if they want
to impose a yoke on us, if they insist so much on keeping us,
this must be, I should think, because our values are superior to
theirs.
Mr. Gérard Asselin: We are worthwhile from the financial point
of view.
Mr. René Canuel: We must be very much worthwhile financially. I
have been fighting for sovereignty for the past thirty years at
least. I have federalist friends who, fortunately, are
realizing more and more that Quebec must become sovereign, not
to stir up trouble but to put an end to the squabbles, not to be
an enemy but to be more of a friend, because they are going to
live in one beautiful country and we in the other. We will then
be able to reach out the hand of brotherhood and all will be
well.
[English]
Mr. John Finlay (Oxford, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, it is a
pleasure to follow the last three speakers.
I have a small comment before I approach the clarity bill from
the point of view of my constituents. I must say to my colleague
from Matapédia—Matane that he appears to have forgotten that
although we talk about two founding nations there are others. We
also have aboriginal people who have been here for more than
11,000 years. We have just established Nunavut within Canada, an
Inuit territory. We have just passed the Nisga'a treaty in B.C.,
an Indian nation. In fact, many Newfoundlanders consider
themselves to be part of a fairly unique group. We have the
Acadians in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.
My friend says that we have the nerve to tell the French
Canadians, the Quebecers, what to do. That is not so. The
government has the responsibility to maintain the federation, if
possible, and to see that it is not broken apart on a vague
question because some people feel disadvantaged. Lots of people
feel disadvantaged.
The member for Saint-John, with whom I have worked very hard on
a couple of committee, said that Quebec tax money is coming into
Ottawa in undue amounts. That is not so. I do not know why we
have to argue about figures which have been the same for a great
many years.
Ontario is a have province. Quebec has been termed a have not
province. That is not out of disrespect of course; it is due to
the equalization payments of the provinces.
Just this year the cash paid to Ontario was raised to equal the
per capita rate that is paid to Quebec. Ontario people knew that
and they were very pleased. Finally they were being paid at the
same rate as Quebecers.
My friend also said that we will stand up and sit down like
rabbits to vote tonight, or soon. There is an easy way to cure
that. They could withdraw the unnecessary amendments. Then we
could all get on with the nation's business and discuss a lot of
other important things that we need to do.
Twice this afternoon speakers from the Bloc talked about
sovereignty with a partnership.
That is what a federation is. It is a partnership among equal
partners. That is what we have in this country and we want to
maintain it.
1650
I agree also with the member for Scarborough East. My
constituents support this bill. They think it is long overdue.
They are fed up with the uncertainty and the instability which
the spectre of sovereignty raises every other year or so over
industry, exports and farm products.
The bill follows the supreme court decision on the Quebec
secession reference and it asks for a clear majority on a clear
question. My friends in the Bloc are upset about 50% plus one.
I would ask the question that the Minister of Intergovernmental
Affairs asked: If 50% plus one is a clear majority, what is an
unclear majority?
In my experience on organizations, hospital boards, school
boards, unions, Liberal associations and other associations, at
an open meeting on a matter that goes to a vote, if there are six
votes for and five against it passes. However, that does not
hold for constitutional amendments. Most of the organizations I
belong to require 66% or a two-thirds majority for a
constitutional amendment, and even that is only following notice
and discussion which has probably taken six months or a year. To
make a constitutional amendment any faster than that would
require 90%, not 66%. Why is that? Because it makes awfully
good sense.
It means that a rump group or a group of zealots cannot change
the constitution of a well respected association, of a
government, a country or a company by marching into the annual
meeting and taking over. It is to preserve the policies, the
methods, the rules by which we live, the rules by which we
conduct our business. It is not to get around anything, it is to
protect us from undue change and unlawful takeovers.
Canada is unique. We have two founding nations. We have two
official languages. In the schools in my county French language
instruction begins in grade 3. We have French immersion in our
public schools. We have French immersion in a high school.
Students take all of their courses in French, and this is in the
heart of southwestern Ontario. Our children know the value of
the federation and their Canada includes Quebec.
Since the 1995 referendum I have co-operated with my colleague
from Brome—Missisquoi in Quebec on a student summer work and
exchange program between my riding and his. I am glad to say
that this program has now spread across the country and literally
hundreds of students each summer go to Quebec, New Brunswick or
other parts of Canada on a work exchange, to live within the
community, learn about that community and return home better
people. They have no trouble understanding, working with or
playing with students from Quebec. They find themselves and
their parents to be very much alike.
Our young people know that Canada is respected around the globe.
Canadians who travel abroad are always happiest when they return
to Canada's shores and set foot again on Canadian soil. They
display the Canadian flag wherever they go because it is sine qua
non. It is an entry to every country in the world, and yet here
we are trying to establish a bit of a rule and clarity on how
long we will keep this country going. We will not have it broken
up by frivolous and unworthy claims.
1655
The last clause in the bill states:
No Minister of the Crown shall propose a constitutional amendment
to effect the secession of a province from Canada unless the
Government of Canada has addressed, in its negotiations, the
terms of secession that are relevant in the circumstances,
including the division of assets and liabilities—
This sounds like a divorce to me. It continues:
—any changes to the borders of the province, the rights,
interests and territorial claims of the Aboriginal peoples of
Canada, and the protection of minority rights.
I wonder how many people have thought about what that would
comprise and how long it would take, a possible change in the
borders of the province.
Most of the people I discussed the matter with are concerned
about four changes. First, the Inuit of northern Quebec would
obviously have to be given some territory because they would not
stay with Quebec if they could stay with Canada.
Second, the Cree of James Bay in northern Quebec would have to
have a large chunk.
Third, maybe the Outaouais-Hull area would want to become part
of Ontario because its citizens do a lot of work here. They have
been freely interchanging for years.
Fourth, in my thinking about this I look at the independence of
India and the partition between Pakistan and India. Eventually
the two parts of Pakistan, thousands of miles apart, ended up as
Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. There has not been peace between
India and Pakistan since they were established. I think that if
Quebec were to go, then we would have to talk about a land
connection between Ontario and New Brunswick.
Mr. Dennis J. Mills (Broadview—Greenwood, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, I appreciate the opportunity to participate in this
debate. I listened to many members of the Bloc Quebecois talk
this afternoon to this bill. Listening to them, I have the
feeling that they feel that unless people are from Quebec they
cannot really relate to their vision of where Quebec should go,
and unless people totally support their view of this bill, then
those people have had no association with or understanding of
their province.
It was 20 years ago this month that I was invited to Ottawa to
work, and that invitation came from a Quebecer. That Quebecer was
sitting in the House of Commons with 74 out of 75 members coming
from Quebec. That member of parliament, the then prime minister
of Canada, went on in May of 1980 to decisively win the first
referendum in the province of Quebec with a vote of almost 60-40.
In 1984, after Mr. Trudeau resigned, I decided to support
another Quebecer who had served the parliament of Canada for many
years. The Right Hon. Jean Chrétien did not win the leadership of
the party then, but—
The Deputy Speaker: I know the hon. member meant to say
the Prime Minister and I know he will want to comply with the
rules in every respect.
Mr. Dennis J. Mills: You are right, Mr. Speaker. The
Right Hon. Prime Minister, who of course is now in his eighth
year, has put this bill before the Parliament of Canada.
Quite frankly this bill is a crafted jewel. I think this bill
will go down in history as one of the best things the Prime
Minister has ever done.
1700
I say that because I listen to my constituents. Not just in my
community in Toronto but right across Canada there is a general
feeling that the debate on Quebec's separation has gone on long
enough. One of the reasons the debate has gone on so long is that
the separatists, the sovereignists, the indépendantistes,
whatever we want to call them, have constantly used clouded
questions, shall I say every trick in the book, to try to confuse
their own communities.
The beautiful thing about this legislation is that for the first
time we have the rules that will actually decide Quebec's right
to sovereignty. No one will deny that right, but some basic
rules will have to be respected: one, a clear question; two, a
majority; and three, we have to make sure if those conditions are
met that the political actors are put together to make that
secession possible.
I have not met anyone yet who is against the notion of a clear
question. Why the Bloc Quebecois would argue the point with
hundreds and hundreds of amendments on a simple clause is really
beyond me.
It was very interesting when we listened to witnesses. Some of
the most respected leaders from the province of Quebec came
before us and said that this bill is in order. Some members said
that maybe they would challenge the process. Maybe they would
like us to take a little longer and debate it. That is a fair
comment but we are elected to lead. We are elected to govern.
The leadership that is in charge right now has said that we have
debated this bill long enough. It has three clauses. Let us get
on with it and we will be accountable for it.
One of the leaders who appeared before us was the former prime
minister of Canada, the Right Hon. Joe Clark. He did not support
the legislation. He felt if a situation ever did arise where a
group of sovereignists were so effective and so passionate that
there should be an environment where ambiguity could buy the
Government of Canada some time so as to delay the process of
negotiating the secession.
I thought Mr. Clark's point was a good one. However he failed
to realize that in this bill, in the third clause, we have
actually enshrined a structure whereby lots of time can be taken
before a secession would be possible. In other words, we could
argue that clause 3 creates an environment of debate and
ambiguity. The reality is that it will take us years before we
can decide on the ground rules. Maybe in that period of time
people in Quebec will have had the opportunity to assess if they
really do want to leave this great country.
That is one of the special features of this bill. Even if there
was a clear question and even if there was a clear majority, it
would literally take years and years. There are people who
essentially at the moment are focused on ripping this country
apart. It would give us time and it would give the political
actors in Canada the time to possibly drag this out until we put
the right type of people in place through the electoral process.
1705
That is one of the genius components of the bill. One could
argue it actually enshrines ambiguity. That is the irony of it:
the clarity bill that enshrines ambiguity.
I want my friends in the Bloc Quebecois to know that I have
spent most of my political life working with people not just from
my province and other provinces across Canada, but men and women
from Quebec. There is a lot more to achieve by their
constituents being part of this great Chamber and being part of
this great country rather than continuing to knock on the door of
separating them from this great nation.
[Translation]
Mr. Réal Ménard (Hochelaga—Maisonneuve, BQ): Madam Speaker, I
have mixed feelings.
First, I have a feeling of gratitude towards our colleague from
Beauharnois—Salaberry and our colleague from
Beauport—Montmorency—Orléans for their excellent work in
committee, where they truly tirelessly defended the rights of
Quebec.
I have mixed feelings because despite this gratitude, I believe
that all who speak out in support of democracy are in a sort of
mourning today.
I listened to our colleague, deliciously pompous as usual,
remind us that the rule of 50% plus one suffered no exception.
Spiritual son of Pierre Elliot Trudeau that he is, he should be
covered in shame, because he must know that his mentor was a
true supporter of the rule of 50% plus one.
In committee, a witness by the name of Guy Lachapelle, an
eminent political scientist—and I will seek consent to table the
document after reading it and I dedicate a single quote to my
colleague—quoted former Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau,
who made the following statement:
Democracy genuinely demonstrates its faith in man by letting
itself be guided by the rule of fifty-one per cent. For if all
men are equal, each one the possessor of a special dignity, it
follows inevitably that the happiness of fifty-one people is more
important than that of forty-nine; it is normal, then,
that—ceteris paribus and taking account of the inviolable rights
of the minority—the decisions preferred by the fifty-one should
prevail.
It is signed Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Approaches to Politics,
Montreal, Éditions du Jour, 1970.
One cannot speak out of both sides of one's mouth.
The reality is that no politician, except the Liberals, is
saying that the Quebec referendum should not be decided by the
National Assembly and that the 50% plus one rule should not
apply.
I challenge any government member to give us one example,
and political expert Guy Lachapelle clearly said “It is
important to remember that no western democracy worthy of that
name makes mention of a specific majority for a referendum”.
I remind hon. members that the sovereignist movement is very
comfortable with the notion of democracy.
Do you know why? It is because three leaders of the sovereignist
movement founded political parties to periodically submit the
option to the public.
1710
It is quite the paradox to live in a political system where the
supreme law of this so-called country is the 1982 Constitution,
which was never approved by the public. By contrast, in Quebec,
three sovereignist leaders historically known and appreciated
have created political parties. We know these leaders; they are
Pierre Bourgault, René Lévesque and Lucien Bouchard.
From time to time, we have had the courage to submit our option
to voters.
Periodically, we have had referendums too. We have submitted
our option to the referendum test. They took part in the 1980
campaign, and the one in 1995. The rule was 50% plus one.
What was the first reaction the next day by that great Quebecer
Lucien Bouchard, at the Mirabel Airport press conference, after
we lost the 1985 referendum? What did the Premier of Quebec
say? His behaviour was that of a democrat. It was not that of
a partisan. It was not that of a party leader, but of a
democrat at the head of seven million Quebecers. The day after
the referendum, what he told Quebecers was this “A no is a no,
but when the day comes that the answer is yes, then that will be
yes, and that will mean yes”.
We accept that rule. We are not saying that the 1995 outcome
was too tight, that its validity is not recognized.
We acknowledge that we lost the 1995 referendum, if only by
50,000 votes. A victory is a victory, if lost by 50,000 votes.
Here in the House of Commons something rather dramatic is going
on. I would like to share with the House just how much
indignation is being stirred up in quarters where none is
usually expected.
Claude Ryan, that intellectual respected by those of all
political stripes, he who was there during the discussions of
the Fulton-Favreau formula, who was there for Victoria, who was
there when the Parti Quebecois took power, who was there in
1995, who has been a minister, leader of the Liberal party,
leader of the no faction, is a federalist. He is a
self-confessed devout federalist, a militant federalist.
He is a man of great discipline and no one can deny the
discipline of Claude Ryan.
He appeared before the parliamentary committee. If it would not
be abusing your kindness, Madam Speaker, we should circulate his
brief.
I quote what he said:
In the third “whereas” of the bill, the federal government, in
accordance with this principle, recognizes that “the government
of any province of Canada is entitled to consult its population
by referendum on any issue and is entitled to formulate the
wording of its referendum question”. However, it contradicts
this statement by including in the bill a clause giving the
Parliament of Canada the power to interfere directly in the
referendum process—
If the National Assembly has the right to consult its population
on a proposal to secede, it must be able to do so free from any
constraint or interference from another parliament.
That is what is bad about the bill. We accept that there is a
split in Quebec between federalists and sovereignists. We
wanted to include in the referendum act provision for the
ability to express one's viewpoint, on equal terms.
We are not in a situation where one option is more amply funded
than another. In democracy, everyone is entitled to his
viewpoint. The best way in a democracy to oppose an idea is to
propose a better one.
We sovereignists think that our idea, our viewpoint, our option
are better than the federalist option. But this is not what we
should be talking about today.
Bill C-20 says to Quebecers “Whatever choice you make, no matter
how you read the constitutional future, there are people outside
Quebec, in the federal parliament, who will retain a veto”. And
that is unacceptable.
1715
Who are the allies of the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs?
I could say that the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs is
not a democrat. I will refrain from passing personal judgement
on the minister. I will put an objective question and ask his
parliamentary secretary to reply. Who are the minister's allies
in Quebec?
When we think about the major central labour bodies, Claude Ryan
and the student federations, we realize that the minister is a
lonely man. The Bloc Quebecois does not find it easy to witness
what is going on right now. It is never easy for democrats, for
elected representatives to watch such wrongdoings.
I will conclude by saying that we are convinced that, in the
short and the long term, Quebecers will opt for democracy and,
when they are consulted at the next federal election, they will
fire this government, which has constantly bullied the National
Assembly and trampled the democratic principles of which we on
this side are so proud.
Mr. Gérard Asselin: Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order.
Given the quality of the speech delivered by the hon. member for
Hochelaga—Maisonneuve and given our interest in Bill C-20, I
request the unanimous consent of the House to allow the member
for Hochelaga—Maisonneuve to have the floor for an indefinite
period of time.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): The hon. member is asking
for unanimous consent to allow the member for
Hochelaga—Maisonneuve to speak for an indefinite period of time.
Is there unanimous consent?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
[English]
Ms. Jean Augustine (Etobicoke—Lakeshore, Lib.): Madam
Speaker, what you have just heard and the debate by the member
across the way does not deserve any continuation. I will join in
the debate and say at the outset that Bill C-20 addresses the
concerns of all Canadians.
For years the people in my riding of Etobicoke—Lakeshore and, I
am sure, all across the country, have wrestled with the
fundamental question of keeping our country together. They have
wrestled with such questions as how will legislators deal with
the possible secession of a Canadian province.
This bill gives answers to Canadians. This bill, rightfully
named the clarity act, gives clarity to the question. Bill C-20
is squarely in line with the Supreme Court of Canada's opinion in
the Quebec secession reference which states clearly that it is
for the political actors to determine what constitutes a clear
majority on a clear question.
With Bill C-20, the federal government is delivering on its
responsibility to all Canadians, giving Canadians an opportunity
to make an informed decision about the breakup of our country.
The clarity act is about good governance and democracy, values
that we cherish in our political system.
Madam Speaker, I want you to keep in mind those three words,
good governance and democracy, as I proceed. What is happening
here today in this debate does not speak to good governance and
democracy as we hear from the members across the way; those
values that we cherish in our political system, those values that
are amplified in this clarity act which sets out principles and
procedures under which the Government of Canada and the House of
Commons must proceed if ever some day we are to decide on the
clarity of the will to secede. It is a framework for the
Government of Canada and it has the support of my constituents
and Canadians across the country.
There was a recent poll done around December 9 to 17.
It was a CROP poll conducted for the Centre for Research and
Information on Canada. Some 58% of respondents agreed with the
government's intention to clarify the conditions under which
secession could be negotiated. It is democracy and good
governance.
1720
The numerous amendments by the Bloc Quebecois to the bill lack
substance and are clearly an obstruction of the process. When we
introduce amendments in the House we do so as members of
parliament with the intention of improving the legislation and
improving the ideas expressed.
Motions Nos. 1, 3, 6, 8, 10 and 12 as put forward by the Bloc do
not have that intention. These motions propose removing the
title of the bill, deleting the existing clauses in the preamble,
gutting the bill and putting us back into a position whereby
Canadians would not be able to get resolution to this thorny
issue of national unity.
The Bloc motions proposing the deletion of the bill title is
aimed solely at stalling the procedures in the House, during the
committee hearings, and are not intended to improve the bill.
On February 15, appearing before the committee studying Bill 99
in the national assembly, the Bloc's intergovernmental affairs
critic was already saying, and I quote:
The difficulty we have, is that the bill is so blatantly
unacceptable that to propose substantive amendments does not seem
to us to be in the order of the day. Proposing amendments to
stall the passage of the bill...is something that is in the realm
of possibility.
Those who say that they want democracy and that the bill is
undemocratic would not at the outset let the process take its
course.
My constituents want us to get clarity on the issue and to know
that we can get over this difficult question that seems to come
around almost in circles. They want us, as members of
parliament, to do their bidding, to stand for a clear question
and decisions so that however we move we will move with clarity.
The title of the bill speaks to that clarity. Any discussion
from across the way that would somehow say that this is
undemocratic does not really speak to the intent of the bill.
I have joined in the debate because I want to see clarity on the
issue. I want my constituents to know that there are members on
this side of the House who want to bring this question to a
close, who want to see this legislation pass this House and who
want to see us go forward into the 21st century with clarity so
that whatever happens, all sides know exactly what the terms are.
I call on my colleagues and those of the opposition, the Bloc
Quebecois especially who are opposing this, that they allow the
democratic process to take place and let the will of Canadians be
heard through this clarity act. I call on everyone of us to join
in ensuring that the bill is passed.
[Translation]
Mr. Serge Cardin (Sherbrooke, BQ): Madam Speaker, 18 months ago
tomorrow, a year and a half to the day, I was elected by the
people of the riding of Sherbrooke.
1725
At that time, I was proud to represent the people of Sherbrooke,
and I still am. At that time too, I was convinced that I would
find the purest expression of democracy in this House. How
naive I was.
I realized that more and more once I had read some excerpts from
the works of political scientist Léon Dion. One of them says,
in substance, that Quebec creates its own worst enemies. At the
time, he did not realize that he was going to become the
spiritual father of the person we can now describe as one of the
worst of Quebec's worst enemies.
We of the Bloc Quebecois have tried on numerous occasions to
enlighten the 26 Quebec Liberals, who are the worst enemies of
Quebec, as well as the House as a whole, by asking repeatedly
for unanimous consent to table documents, and the government
refused. It refused to be enlightened.
This past February 7, Parliament began its first sitting in this
new millennium. Everyone thought the millennium bug was a thing
of the past, but we now know this was not the case. The
government is contaminated with a virus. In fact, we are pretty
well certain that the millennium bug is the federal Liberal
government itself.
We are all aware of several viruses affecting the Liberal
government. Of course, earlier in the year, there was the
Minister of Industry's attempt to subsidize sports millionaires
by giving direct favours to some helpful friends.
At the moment, there is a scandal at the Department of Human
Resources Development arising from political meddling intended
to help friends or buy votes.
The biggest virus, however, the most destructive, the vilest, is
Bill C-20, the produce of a sort of germ or rather a two headed
mite eating away at our democratic net like a sort of rat.
So, on December 13, 1999, the duo of the Prime Minister and the
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs tabled in the House of
Commons an act to give effect to the requirement for clarity as
set out in the opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada. Since
then, the federal government has brought out its work boots to
ram through a bill that disregards the political institutions
Quebec has created and acts as if there had never been three
referendums.
Ideally, we would have Bill C-20 withdrawn. There are three good
reasons for this.
First, it gives the House of Commons power to disallow
legislation passed by the National Assembly and a choice
expressed by the Quebec people.
The bill also denies Quebecers the freedom to choose their own
political destiny and to include in a referendum question,
should they so wish, a proposal of partnership with Canada.
Bill C-20 denies the universally accepted rule of 50% plus one
for the majority and the fundamental rule of the equality of
votes. And the reason for this is clear. It is because the
government knows that the next Quebec referendum will be a
winner for the Quebec people. So, with this bill, the
government thinks it can get out of its obligation to negotiate.
It is supremely wrong.
Not only does it want to get out of future negotiations, it does
not even want to debate its bill in the House with the members.
It proved it by imposing a gag on hon. members as early as
second reading, then at the legislative committee stage and
again, today, at third reading.
A few years ago, in an interview on Quebec television, Pierre
Elliott Trudeau, a former Prime Minister, stated that the people
were sovereign and that a country could only be founded on the
will of its people to be governed, and a free people must decide
its own destiny and chose democratically its leaders.
If we are free, no yoke or shackles must be put on us, nobody
outside Quebec should dictate to us what to think or what to do?
With Bill C-20, the federal government wants to force Quebec to
do things its way, to impose the procedure and determine the
rules of the game.
1730
If, as a Quebecer, I wanted to tell Ontario or another province
how to manage itself, I would be told to mind my own business.
That is exactly what the majority of the members from Quebec in
this House, the National Assembly as a whole and many major
organizations representing thousands of Quebecers are saying to
the Liberal government in Ottawa: “Mind your own business and
get off our backs. We have the sacred right to make our own
decisions”.
Quebec is not a child, it is big enough to take care of itself
without federal government interference. It can very well make
enlightened decisions without Ottawa taking it by the hand or
telling it what is good for Quebecers.
With Bill C-20, the Liberal government is telling us, like one
does with a child, how to define a fair majority, a majority
that suits its needs. All over the world, the 50% plus one rule
is the accepted majority. Here in Canada, which claims to be a
cradle of democracy, the Liberals want to change this
universally accepted rule, according to their mood. Will it be
60%, 65% or 70%? Will it depend on whether it snows or rains on
that day? This is called controlling democracy.
Some major Quebec organizations have condemned Bill C-20. The
CSN, the FTQ and the CEQ formed a united front to condemn this
unprecedented show of force against Quebec, and so have various
other associations, including student federations, women's
groups and community and social groups.
Twice, for the 1980 and 1995 referenda on the future of Quebec,
it was the National Assembly that set the rules of the game and
no one in Quebec, whether in the federalist or sovereignist
camp, challenged the legitimacy and democratic character of
these two public consultations. We had the right to do it then,
but not any more. We can do it one day, but not the next day.
The Liberal government is playing with democracy as if it were a
yoyo.
On October 30, 1995, the no side won by a few tens of thousands
of votes. The universal majority rule, 50% plus one, applied.
Not one of those Quebecers who voted yes and who lost the
referendum challenged the validity of that rule. We respected
the public's decision.
Incidentally, I remind hon. members that all the referendums
held in Canada so far were based on the universal rule of 50%
plus one.
Canada has also recognized many countries created after
referendums held according to the same rule. This is also the
rule used by the United Nations when it supervises referendums
on sovereignty. Why should the federal government not ask the
United Nations to change its democratic rule and set an
arbitrary percentage to dictate the procedure to other
countries?
If Quebec were sovereign, nobody would tell us what to do or
what to think. We would not be in a federal yoke. The federal
government was caught in its own trap when the Supreme Court of
Canada recognized the legitimacy of the sovereigntist option and
the obligation to negotiate on equal terms. Even if Canada does
not recognize a yes at the next referendum, the other counties
of the international community will if everything is done
democratically.
I am proud to be a Quebecer, even more so when people from
Quebec are successful internationally. With sovereignty, it is
Quebec as a whole that will be successful internationally.
The federal government tricked us when it repatriated the
Constitution of Canada without Quebec's consent. Enough is
enough. The time when they played tricks on us and decided for
us is over. We are a great people capable of taking its destiny
into its own hands. We want to be autonomous and sovereign.
That, at least, is clear.
[English]
Mrs. Karen Redman (Kitchener Centre, Lib.): Madam
Speaker, I am truly pleased to stand in the House today as a
member of the legislative committee that worked on the clarity
bill. In a word I would describe the bill as brilliant.
The separation of Quebec would have profound effects on the whole
of Canada and its citizens, including Quebecers wishing to remain
in Quebec.
1735
While I agree with this sentiment these are not my words. These
are the words of Claude Castonguay, a former Quebec cabinet
minister from the Bourassa government.
The clarity bill is a reasonable bill. It is made up of three
clauses. It is brief and it is straightforward unlike the 411
motions brought forward by the Bloc Quebecois with which the
House will deal later today.
In Motions Nos. 13 to 68 in Group No. 2 there are frivolous
changes to the 30 day suggestion put out in the clarity bill.
They range from 50 days to 250 days. They are not constructive
and they do not improve this piece of legislation.
The message we all took from the 1995 referendum was that we
came dangerously close to losing our country on a vague question
and a dubious vote. In 1995 the referendum question asked by the
Quebec government was confusing. It read:
Do you agree that Quebec should become sovereign, after having
made a formal offer to Canada for a new economic and political
partnership, within the scope of the Bill respecting the future
of Quebec and of the agreement signed on June 12th?
Quebecers who voted on this question felt they understood, but
when they were polled there was a great disparity as to what they
thought they were voting on. While individuals were clear within
their minds it was not a shared vision that they were voting on.
The results of the referendum saw the yes side receive 49.6% of
the vote and the no side receive 50.4%. Support fluctuated by 15
percentage points depending on whether sovereignty would be
accompanied by economic partnership with the rest of Canada.
Voter turnout for the referendum was high because Quebecers
realized the stakes were high. Individuals, while convinced
their interpretations were clear, did not share the common view.
The clarity bill states that within 30 days of a provincial
government officially releasing a referendum question on
secession, the House of Commons would express its opinion by
resolution as to whether or not the question is clear. If the
House found that the vote on the question could not result in a
clear expression of will by the population of that province on
whether or not it would cease to be part of Canada, it would no
longer deal with the question.
In reaching its assessment the House would take into account the
views of other political actors, political parties in the
legislative assembly of the province whose government was
proposing secession, other provincial or territorial governments
and other legislatures.
Soliciting a direct expression of will of the population of a
province as to whether the province would cease to be part of
Canada is a huge question. This has results that could not go
back four years and be reversed. The Government of Canada would
enter into negotiations only if the House had concluded that
there had been a clear expression of will by a clear majority of
the population of that province.
In reaching the assessment the House would take into account
matters it considered relevant. These kinds of issues need to be
dealt with in context. The clarity bill spells out the
qualitative aspect of both the question and the majority.
Secession would require an amendment to our constitution. It
would involve at least the governments of all the provinces as
well as the Government of Canada. We would have to discuss such
things as division of assets and liabilities, perhaps border
changes from the province and of course the rights, interests and
territorial claims of aboriginal peoples as well as the
protection of the rights of minorities.
Another issue that came up very many times when we were
discussing this bill—and we heard from many expert witnesses
during this process—was whether or not 50% plus one was an
indication of a clear majority, a majority that would be
irreversible. One does not break up a country with 50% plus one.
Quebecers have already said no twice to secession but the
question keeps coming up. How many times is enough? Is it three
out of five? Is it five out of seven? Is it seven out of
twelve? How many times will we deal with this issue?
Members opposite would have us believe that 50% plus one is a
telling majority, and yet they have received that from the no
side and they continue to ask the question. No means no now but
yes means maybe later. Yes is forever. Only a yes vote will
give rise to irreversible change that will bind future
generations of the country.
1740
The supreme court requires political actors to assess the
clarity of any future majority in favour of secession. It uses
the expression clear majority 13 times in its ruling to underline
how much it feels this is an issue to be dealt with.
The hon. member for
Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok in Motion No. 2
states that the acceptable majority in the 1995 referendum was
50% plus one and therefore this is the threshold that should be
used in any future referendum.
Quebec's own referendum laws set no threshold for an acceptable
majority precisely because referendums in Canada are
consultative. This was recognized by the PQ government in its
white paper leading to its referendum law which stated:
The fact that referenda are consultative makes it unnecessary to
include provisions about a required majority or a level of voter
participation.
The supreme court's opinion made clear that there was no precise
numerical threshold which would trigger negotiations but that:
It will be for political actors to determine what constitutes a
clear majority on a clear question...in the circumstances under
which a future referendum vote may be taken.
When we ask Quebecers what they think, on October 30, 1999, the
Government of Canada released a poll that was conducted of 4,992
Quebecers. It is one of the most important and precise polls,
with a margin of 1.6% error, ever conducted on the question of
national unity. The will of Quebecers was never again to undergo
a confused referendum process such as those that we saw in 1980
and 1995. Quebecers want the process for any future referendums
to be based on the principle of clarity. Most say it is
reasonable to require a clear referendum question; 93% versus 4%
agreed with this statement and on a clear majority 72% agreed
versus 24% before Quebec can become independent.
The majority of Quebecers say that the 1995 referendum question
was not clear at a support level of 61% versus 36%. Quebecers
are opposed to a unilateral declaration of independence if the
yes side won in a referendum. The majority says it is reasonable
that the Government of Quebec would have to reach an agreement
with the rest of Canada before declaring independence.
Quebecers say there is also majority support for the supreme
court's decision that the Government of Quebec does not have the
right to unilaterally declare independence. That was supported
55% versus 36%.
During our two week consultation process when we again heard
from many expert witnesses, many former colleagues at different
levels of government came to talk to us. Ed Broadbent commented,
when appearing before the legislative committee on Bill C-20, as
follows:
Of the 13 new countries to emerge following referenda in the
post-World War II, post-colonial era, nine had positive results
over 95%; two over 90%; and the remaining two in excess of 75%.
He went on to say:
In my view, Premier Bouchard would be a wise man if he waited
until he could expect comparable results. He would be even wiser
to abandon his secessionist goal and acknowledge the evident
truth that the majority of Quebecers have made great gains in
recent decades. By means of the rights and freedoms enjoyed by
all Canadians, they have created a wonderful and, dare I say it,
distinct society. They are proud Quebecers and proud Canadians.
The clarity bill defines the real stakes in a referendum. The
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, when he appeared before
the legislative committee, said:
On August 20, 1998, the supreme court gave a legal confirmation
to that moral obligation. It is eminently desirable that we all
respect that opinion, whether we are in favour of Canadian unity
or Quebec independence.
Secession is a black hole and I am convinced that the clarity
bill is the best guide in making our way through.
* * *
1745
BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Hon. Don Boudria (Leader of the Government in the House of
Commons, Lib.): Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I
wish to designate Thursday, March 16, an opposition day.
* * *
AN ACT TO GIVE EFFECT TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR CLARITY AS SET
OUT IN THE OPINION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA IN THE QUEBEC
SECESSION REFERENCE
The House resumed consideration of Bill C-20, an act to give
effect to the requirement for clarity as set out in the opinion
of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Quebec Secession Reference,
as reported (without amendment) from the legislative committee,
and of the amendments in Group No. 1.
Mr. Roy Bailey (Souris—Moose Mountain, Ref.): Madam
Speaker, I had not intended to take part in this debate, but
having been here this afternoon it may seem to people watching
that this is a dispute between Ontario and Quebec.
I know that hon. members opposite do not mean it that way, but
because they are the closest to Quebec it sometimes comes across
that way. Indeed, people from western Canada, particularly in my
area, look upon this more as a debate down east that does not
make reference to them.
In my province the largest ethnic group is comprised of
Anglo-Saxons, followed by the Ukrainians, the Germans and then
the French. I was born in a French town. I refereed hockey in a
dozen French communities, so I know very well what it is like and
I am very proud to have lived in those French communities. My
son-in-law's name is Tetreau and I am proud of that as well.
Having said that, I am not about to leave the west out of this
picture. As westerners are looking at this debate this
afternoon, many of the people in my constituency are asking what
we are arguing about. They are losing their farms. To them this
is not an important issue over their individual issues because of
what has happened.
Let us take a look at what was handed to Quebec with
confederation. It was guaranteed 24 senators. That is the same
as the four western provinces. It was also guaranteed so many
members of parliament, regardless of what happens to its
population. The only other province which got that guarantee of
course was Prince Edward Island.
What we do not understand about this is, when people talk about
a sovereign nation, nobody explains to the people west of Ontario
what they mean by that. To westerners a sovereign nation is a
separate entity unto itself. It has its own laws, its own money
system, its own trade and commerce, all of that. It is indeed a
separate nation.
When I read what Quebec voted on, it talked about sovereignty
and then all these other things. As far as the people
of western Canada are concerned—and let me say that it is very
clear as I travel in western Canada—if my hon. friends in the
Bloc want a sovereign nation, it will have to be the total
meaning of sovereignty. It will not be some sort of association.
It is one or the other. They cannot have it both ways.
At the present time Quebec is part of an association, the
federal government, and so is Saskatchewan an associate of this
government. We do not ask for separate identities. The
Europeans are coming together for particular reasons, because
they are bound by international agreements or monetary
agreements. Quebec would have to have a separate agreement
entirely. Otherwise, B.C. would want to go. Not too long ago
it was the four western provinces. Some of my friends from the
west will remember the WCC, the Western Canada Concept Party.
That is what it actually wanted. Its separation was based on a
financial barrier, for obvious purposes.
While my people are floundering around trying to understand how
they are going to live for another year, we have people here
whose reasons to become separate and totally apart from Canada
they say are not based on economics. That could be proven.
It has never been quite clear to the people of western Canada
why these people are attempting to separate. To be honest with
you, Madam Speaker, in all of my reading and following of this
issue, that issue has never become fundamentally clear to me and
it has never been fundamentally clear to the people beyond
Ontario in western Canada.
1750
[Translation]
Mrs. Francine Lalonde (Mercier, BQ): Madam Speaker, this is
indeed a very sad day in the parliamentary history of Canada,
because we have before us a bill that is misleading even in its
title, an act to give effect to the requirement for clarity as
set out in the opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada in the
Quebec Secession Reference. Many observers have commented that
this requirement is nowhere to be found in the opinion of the
court.
This bill deals with clarity, but the bill itself does not
provide for conditions, except one, to which I will come back
later on. At all of its stages, exceptional rules have been
applied to this bill. This bill, supposedly on clarity, will be
passed through a process that can hardly be considered
democratic.
This bill has been very well understood by David Jones, a former
minister-counsellor to the U.S. embassy from 1992 to 1996. In an
article published in a publication available to all diplomats in
Ottawa and elsewhere, he wrote “In any case, this bill on
clarity is a masterpiece of political ambiguity. It allows the
Quebec government to hold a referendum on any question it
wishes, but Ottawa reserves the right to evaluate afterwards
whether the question was clear, and, by way of consequence,
whether the federal government will negotiate or not on the
basis of that question”.
This is still David Jones talking, a former minister-counsellor
to the U.S. embassy in Ottawa from 1992 to 1996. He said
“Without saying it in so many words, Ottawa rejects the
questions of the 1980 and 1995 referendums”. We are not the ones
saying that. He goes on “Surely, a majority government could
declare unclear any question but this one: Quebec will secede
immediately from Canada”. This is what David Jones said.
He also talks about the 50% plus one majority. Nowhere is it
said in the bill that it is not enough, but the bill provides
enough latitude to state, once it is over, that it is not enough
and that any other majority would not be enough either.
What else does Mr. Jones say? He says “When it moves away from
the basic political rule of 50% plus one, without proposing
another percentage, any democracy is moving in unchartered
waters”.
This bill only contains one clear provision and it is the one
that says that what will not be considered as a clear question,
and will consequently not commit the government to negotiate, is
a referendum question that:
This is very serious. It comes back to the explanation given by
David Jones. Moreover, a question will not be considered clear
if it:
1755
With these two paragraphs, as the former political adviser of
the United States embassy says once again, the government is
retroactively stating that both referendum questions were not
clear.
If, in the historic progress of the Quebec people, there is one
thing that is clear, with respect to the movement that appeared
with several small parties, but flourished with the Parti
Quebecois and later with the Bloc Quebecois, it is that this
movement is part of the ever-changing modern model that everyone
here is applauding, that is the model of the European Union.
I again quote from a text written by René Lévesque that he
presented to activist members in his riding of Laurier, before
submitting it to the Liberal Party, which rejected it.
He said “We believe that it is possible to avoid this joint
stalemate of the Canadian federation”—joint stalemate where the
government introduced Bill C-20 instead of talking about the
situation of Western farmers—“by adapting to our situation the
two major tendencies that dominate our era, one of which is the
freedom of peoples and the other is political and economic
groups freely negotiated”. This was in 1967.
How is it that no colleague from the other side tried to respond
to our repeated claims that this bill is deceptive because it
gives English Canadians the illusion that it will make the
sovereign independent movement disappear in a jiffy?
This is an illusion and a danger because it implies that the
process is an easy one, that they only have to say no and to
pass a bill for the sovereignist movement to disappear. This is
not so.
It is amazing, but no one talked about the will to negotiate.
Having met an angel on his way, the Minister of
Intergovernmental Affairs wrote “No, sovereignty partnership is
not moderate because, between sovereignty partnership, the
referendum and its conclusion, secession occurs”. That is it.
Instead of being an agent of what could be a renewal of the
relations between Quebec and Canada, he says “No, no, no. The
only possibility for you, my friends, is to vote for secession,
period. We will decide if we will agree to negotiate with you”.
He does not say that he will not have the means to object.
For example, in a referendum where the question is on the
partnership option, if the results are 53.5%, given a strong
vote like the last time, you will not be able to initiate any
negotiation because those who pay down the debt will pressure
you. You will not be able to resist the people's pressure. We
are not the ones who are creating confusion, you are.
I sincerely regret all the time spent to try to thwart the
sovereignist movement, or to convince Canadians that there is
nothing to worry about, that the government will rid them of
that gang, as the government House leader has said, speaking
about us. Well, I have got news for you because there is a good chance
that the Bloc will be even stronger next time.
1800
In spite of this vote, in spite of this charade, this travesty
of democracy that is the exceptional procedure used throughout
consideration of this bill, I hope that our colleagues opposite
will seriously think about the relations between Quebec and
Canada. We have no choice because we are neighbours and we will
remain neighbours for a very long time.
[English]
Ms. Sarmite Bulte (Parkdale—High Park, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, I am delighted to participate in the debate on Bill
C-20. I would like to do so by referring to some of the motions
or the amendments that have been put forward today.
Today and this evening at 6.30 the House will be voting on 411
motions or amendments by the opposition parties. Pursuant to
Standing Order 76.1(5) the Speaker has grouped the motions for
debate into five groups. I would like to speak to the motions in
Group No. 1.
Group No. 1 deals with the preamble of the bill. The preamble
itself contains eight clauses. In addition to the preamble the
clarity bill itself is actually very clear and straightforward.
It contains three operating clauses.
There is a reason I have chosen to speak on the preamble and on
the motions within Group No. 1. I ask the Canadian people to
decide for themselves tonight as they watch the House of Commons
start to vote at 6.30 p.m. whether in fact what they are
experiencing here is democracy at work, as my friends in the Bloc
have said a number of times today, or is it really an abuse of
the parliamentary process and parliamentary rules and procedure.
I do so by looking specifically at Motions Nos. 5 and 9 and
talking a bit about the preamble. The bill closely reflects the
decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Quebec secession
reference. Each of the preamble clauses is drawn from elements of
the court's judgment. Despite Premier Bouchard's attempt to
conveniently ignore certain parts of the judgment, it is
important that all the elements be reflected in the clarity act
preamble.
When we look at Motions Nos. 5 and 9 which are the motions I
would like to start with, we will note that Motion No. 5 seeks to
delete a word from the first clause of the preamble. So that
Canadians know what we are talking about, clause 1 of the
preamble states:
Whereas the Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed that there is
no right, under international law or under the Constitution of
Canada, for the National Assembly, legislature or government of
Quebec to effect the secession of Quebec from Canada
unilaterally;
Instead of a motion being brought forward by my friends in the
Bloc to question or to amend this, because I have heard time and
time again the amendments are here to make the bill better, what
does Motion No. 5 say? Motion No. 5 states that Bill C-20 in the
preamble be amended by replacing lines 1 and 2 on page 1 with the
following, and it deletes the words that the Supreme Court of
Canada “has confirmed” and replaces them with the words the
Supreme Court of Canada “is of the opinion”.
Are we talking substantive amendments or are we talking as in my
days as a lawyer of what we would call frivolous and vexatious
motions? Let us look at that.
Let us move to Motion No. 9 which again is a substantive
amendment with so much rhetoric across the way saying that they
are are trying to make this bill so much better. What does
Motion No. 9 say? Let us look at clause 4 of the preamble. It is
important for Canadians to know what we are talking about. We
are not talking about the government abusing democracy or wanting
to invoke closure so that we do not have the ability to debate or
make substantive comments. We are talking about proposing
frivolous and vexatious motions.
Do the people of Canada know that today in the House of Commons
when we start voting at 6.30 we will be potentially voting
continuously until 2.30 a.m. on Thursday morning?
Is that democracy at work or is it again an abuse of
parliamentary procedure at best?
1805
Let us look at what clause 4 says:
What part of that section of the preamble has been moved to be
changed? Are we amending ambiguity? Are we amending that there
is an obligation that negotiations be entered into? Are we
amending anything substantial?
Let us look at what Motion No. 9 says. It is a funny thing. It
sounds like Motion No. 5 because again they want to delete a
word. The word this time is not “confirmed”. It is the word
“determined”, whereas the Supreme Court of Canada has given an
opinion, instead of using the word “determined”.
Those are the substantial democratic amendments the members of
the Bloc have proposed. Is it so substantive that we change the
word “confirmed” to “determine”? What is wrong with those
words?
I remind members of the House of Commons that certainly as a
lawyer who practised 18 years and as a member of the Ontario bar,
I knew that when the supreme court made a pronouncement it was
regarded as highly persuasive and binding on all lower courts.
Governments in Canada have always acted as though reference
opinions were binding on them. Governments not acting in
accordance with reference opinions risk legal challenges on any
aspect of opinions dealing with legal issues.
Is this a question of semantics or is this a question of
substance?
I would also like to quote what the supreme court noted in the
reference regarding remuneration of judges of the provincial
court. The court stated: “The fact that this court's opinion is
only advisory does not leave the parties without a remedy. They
can seek a declaration. This court's opinion will be of highly
persuasive weight”.
Opinion, determination, confirmation; is it truly necessary that
for this first group of amendments, Motions Nos. 1 to 12, that we
sit here for two or three hours to determine on the preamble?
What in substance is talked about in the preamble?
Motion No. 2 did address the fact that whereas when the Quebec
people were consulted by referendum in 1995, the winning choice
was the one that obtained the majority of the votes declared
valid, that is 50% of the votes plus one.
That could possibly be a substantive amendment, but what is
intended and what does that accomplish by putting that amendment
in? We could also go into the history of Canada from the date of
confederation and the British North America Act and what powers
were given to the provinces and Quebec's special status in
Canada. We could do that as well.
Sometimes people just say things for the sake of saying things.
I would submit that Motion No. 2 is exactly that.
If my friends in the Bloc were actually true to their
substantive amendments, why is it that they propose in Motion
Nos. 5 and 9 that the words “confirmed” and “determined” be
substituted by the words “of the opinion”, but at the same time
in previous Motion Nos. 4 and 8, they seek to delete both
paragraph one of the preamble and number four? And if they do
not get away with that, then in Motion No. 3 they completely seek
to strike out the entire amount of the preamble.
I say to all Canadians, is what we are seeing here substantive
amendments? Is this how we try to make our lives better? Is
this what the Canadian taxpayers are paying us to do, to sit here
for 55 hours to vote on, with all due respect to some who may
claim in the House of Commons, substantive amendments?
I would submit that that is not the case. In fact this is not a
case of democracy at work, but it is truly a case of
parliamentary procedure being abused at best.
1810
Why is the federal government taking this action in the face of
such strong opposition? I would submit that the government has
taken this decision because Quebecers have a right not to lose
their country unless it is clearly expressed in their will and
unless negotiations are concluded that respect the rights and
interests of all Canadians.
As the only government representing all Canadians and as one of
the parties in possible negotiations, it is important that the
Government of Canada signal the circumstances under which it
would enter into negotiations that could lead to the breakup of
this country. Given the dramatic consequences of secession, it
is in the interests of Quebecers and all other Canadians that
such negotiations only be undertaken if it is the clear will of
Quebecers that they no longer wish to remain in Canada.
When we talk again about substance or frivolity, when we talk
about democracy or abuse of process, I would ask all Canadians as
they watch tonight and for the next 54 hours that they determine
what truly is happening here.
Mr. Mac Harb (Ottawa Centre, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, it is
sad that we even have to debate this bill. In my view it is
quite simple and straightforward. It should have gone through
the House without any debate at all.
This is a straightforward bill that acknowledges the right of
the people to decide. All this bill does is to say that in this
partnership that we are in, if one of the partners wants to leave
and go on its own, it is important to at least discuss the
partnership. That is what this bill is all about.
There has been more than one occasion of this so far. Two or
three times in a row when asked to vote on the whole question of
whether or not they want to remain a part of Canada, the people
have decided they want to remain as part of Canada. The question
is when is this debate going to end?
None of my colleagues in the Bloc Quebecois have stood up to
tell us when enough is enough. When would the separatists say
enough is enough? They lost the first time. They lost the
second time. They lost the third time. And they will lose again
for as long as we have a country and a nation. We will continue
to have a nation for the next 10,000 years, just as we have had
for the past 10,000 years.
The bottom line is that the Supreme Court of Canada has rendered
a ruling. Even the premier of Quebec, Mr. Bouchard, and others
have clearly applauded and clearly stated that they want the
federal government to obey the decision of the court. We are
responding to what Mr. Bouchard stated in the early days of when
the judgment came down. That is that we have to have clear rules
and everybody has a right to play as long as we know what the
rules of the game are.
We are saying that at the federal level in order for us to
decide whether or not we are going to participate in the breakup
of this partnership, two things are absolutely unequivocal.
First, there should be a clear question that is straightforward
with no monkeying around and no ups and downs. The people have
to be asked a very clear question. That is fair and none of my
colleagues will dispute that.
Second, there has to be an absolute majority, a clear majority.
I do not think any one of my colleagues would object to that. If
we were to ask a question of the people and have a clear answer
to it, then let us sit down and talk. That is what the
government is doing, unlike my colleagues opposite who are trying
to break up one of the best countries on earth. It is the best
country on earth. It is not just me and my colleagues in the
House of Commons who say that. Every single person in the
country knows that this is the greatest country on earth.
1815
The Deputy Speaker: Order, please. It being 6.15 p.m.,
pursuant to order made earlier today, it is my duty to interrupt
the proceedings and put forthwith every question necessary to
dispose of the report stage of the bill now before the House.
[Translation]
The question is on Motion No. 1. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Deputy Speaker: The recorded division on Motion No. 1 stands
deferred.
The next question is on the proposed amendment to Motion No. 2.
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the amendment?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Deputy Speaker: The recorded division on the amendment
stands deferred.
The next question is on Motion No. 3. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Deputy Speaker: The recorded division on Motion No.3 stands
deferred.
I will now put the motions in Group No. 2 to the House.
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing lines 34 and
35 on page 2 with the following:
“1. (1) The House of Commons shall, not before 50 days after
the government of a province”
Mr. Réal Ménard (Hochelaga—Maisonneuve, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by
replacing lines 34 and 35 on page 2 with the following:
“1. (1) The House of Commons shall, not before 200 days
after the government of a province”
Mr. Yves Rocheleau (Trois-Rivières, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing
lines 34 and 35 on page 2 with the following:
“1. (1) The House of Commons shall, not before 100 days
after the government of a province”
Mr. Bernard Bigras (Rosemont, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 2
with the following:
Mr. Yvan Bernier (Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok, BQ)
moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause
1, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 2 with the following:
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on
page 2 with the following:
1820
Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire (Longueuil, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on
page 2 with the following:
Mr. Ghislain Fournier (Manicouagan, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on
page 2 with the following:
Mr. Antoine Dubé (Lévis-et-Chutes-de-la-Chaudière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by
replacing line 35 on page 2 with the following:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by
replacing line 35 on page 2 with the following:
Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 2
with the following:
Mr. Pierre de Savoye (Portneuf, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on
page 2 with the following:
Mr. Gérard Asselin (Charlevoix, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on
page 2 with the following:
Ms. Hélène Alarie (Louis-Hébert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on
page 2 with the following:
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 2
with the following:
Mr. Maurice Dumas (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by
replacing line 35 on page 2 with the following:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by
replacing line 35 on page 2 with the following:
Mr. Maurice Godin (Châteauguay, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on
page 2 with the following:
Mrs. Monique Guay (Laurentides, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 2
with the following:
Mrs. Pierrette Venne (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by
replacing line 35 on page 2 with the following:
Mr. René Canuel (Matapédia—Matane, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing
line 35 on page 2 with the following:
Mr. Claude Bachand (Saint-Jean, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on
page 2 with the following:
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau (Repentigny, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on
page 2 with the following:
Mr. Daniel Turp (Beauharnois—Salaberry, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing
line 35 on page 2 with the following:
Mr. Paul Mercier (Terrebonne—Blainville, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by
replacing line 35 on page 2 with the following:
1825
Mr. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 2
with the following:
That
Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 2
with the following:
Mr. Odina Desrochers (Lotbinière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 41 on
page 2 with the following:
“tion, adopted by a majority of the members present in the House
of Commons, which majority shall consist of not less than fifty
percent plus one member of the members elected for the province
in which the referendum will be held, set out its determination
on whether the”
Mr. Bernard Bigras (Rosemont, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by adding after line 42 on
page 2 the following:
“(1.1) For the purposes of subsection (1), “resolution”
means a resolution adopted by a majority of the members present
in the House of Commons, which majority shall consist of not less
than fifty percent plus one member of the members elected for the
province in which the referendum will be held.”
Mr. Maurice Godin (Châteauguay, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 5
on page 3.
Mr. Yvan Bernier (Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok, BQ)
moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause
1, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 3 with the following:
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 5 on
page 3 with the following:
Mr. Ghislain Fournier (Manicouagan, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 5 on
page 3 with the following:
Mr. Pierre de Savoye (Portneuf, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 5 on
page 3 with the following:
Ms. Hélène Alarie (Louis-Hébert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 5 on
page 3 with the following:
Mr. Maurice Godin (Châteauguay, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 5 on
page 3 with the following:
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 3
with the following:
Mr. René Canuel (Matapédia—Matane, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing
line 5 on page 3 with the following:
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau (Repentigny, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 5 on
page 3 with the following:
1830
Mr. Daniel Turp (Beauharnois—Salaberry, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing
line 5 on page 3 with the following:
Mr. Gilles-A. Perron (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by deleting
lines 6 to 12 on page 3.
Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold (Jonquière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by deleting lines 13 to
30 on page 3.
Mr. Gérard Asselin (Charlevoix, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by deleting lines 17 to
22 on page 3.
Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien (Frontenac—Mégantic, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by deleting
lines 23 to 30 on page 3.
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau (Repentigny, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by deleting lines 31 to
41 on page 3.
Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg—Transcona, NDP) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing
lines 39 and 40 on page 3 with the following:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing
line 40 on page 3 with the following:
“resolutions by the Senate, any formal statements or resolutions
by the representatives of the Aboriginal peoples of Canada,
especially those in the province whose government is proposing
the referendum on secession, and any other views”
Mr. Michel Guimond
(Beauport—Montmorency—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île-d'Orléans, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in
Clause 1, be amended by deleting lines 42 to 47 on page 3 and
lines 1 to 3 on page 4.
[English]
The Speaker: The question is on Motion No. 13. Is it the
pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: A recorded division on Motion No. 13 stands
deferred.
The next question is on Motion No. 18. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: A recorded division on Motion No. 18 stands
deferred.
The next question is on Motion No. 48.
1835
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: A recorded division on Motion No. 48 stands
deferred. The recorded division will also apply to Motion
No. 49.
The next question is on Motion No. 50. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: A recorded division on Motion No. 50 stands
deferred.
The next question is on Motion No. 61. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: A recorded division on Motion No. 61 stands
deferred.
The next question is on Motion No. 62. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: A recorded division on Motion No. 62 stands
deferred.
The next question is on Motion No. 65. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: A recorded division on Motion. No. 65 stands
deferred.
The next question is on Motion. No. 68. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: A recorded division on Motion No. 68 stands
deferred.
[Translation]
Mr. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 4 to 17 on
page 4.
Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire (Longueuil, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing line 12 on
page 4 with the following:
“consider and, by resolution, adopted by a majority of the
members present in the House of Commons, which majority shall
consist of not less than fifty percent plus one member of the
members elected for the province in which the referendum has been
held, set out its deter-”
1840
Mr. Daniel Turp (Beauharnois—Salaberry, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by adding
after line 17 on page 4 the following:
“(1.1) For the purposes of subsection (1), “resolution”
means a resolution adopted by a majority of the members present
in the House of Commons, which majority shall consist of not less
than fifty percent plus one member of the members elected for the
province in which the referendum has been held.”
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 18 to 28 on
page 4.
Mr. Paul Mercier (Terrebonne—Blainville, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting
lines 23 and 24 on page 4.
Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg—Transcona, NDP) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing
lines 23 and 24 on page 4 with the following:
Mr. Claude Bachand (Saint-Jean, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 25 and
26 on page 4.
Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg—Transcona, NDP) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing
lines 25 and 26 on page 4 with the following:
Mrs. Maud Debien (Laval East, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 27 and
28 on page 4.
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 29 to
42 on page 4.
Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg—Transcona, NDP) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing
lines 39 to 41 on page 4 with the following:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing
line 41 on page 4 with the following:
“ate, any formal statements or resolutions by the representatives
of the Aboriginal peoples of Canada, especially those in the
province whose government proposed the referendum on secession,
and any other views it considers to be”
Mrs. Monique Guay (Laurentides, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 8
on page 5.
Mr. Grant Hill (Macleod, Ref.) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by adding after line 8
on page 5 the following:
“(5) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section,
the Government of Canada shall not enter into negotiations with
the government of a province that has submitted a clear question
to its voters in a referendum on the proposed secession of the
province from Canada unless the population of the province has
indicated that it wants the province to cease to be part of
Canada by casting fifty percent plus one vote of the votes cast
in the referendum.”
That Bill C-20, in Clause 2, be amended by adding after line 8
on page 5 the following:
“(5) Where the House of Commons determines pursuant to this
section that there has been a clear expression of a will by a
clear majority of the population of a province that the province
cease to be part of Canada, the Government of Canada shall invite
the governments of the other provinces each to name a Minister of
the Crown to represent the province in the negotiations and the
Ministers of the Crown so named shall participate fully in all
discussions and meetings relevant to negotiating the terms of
secession.”
1845
[English]
The Speaker: The next question is on Motion No. 69. Is
it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: A recorded division on Motion No. 69 stands
deferred.
[Translation]
The next question is on Motion No. 72. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: The recorded division on Motion No. 72 stands
deferred.
The next question is on Motion No. 78. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: The recorded division on Motion No. 78 stands
deferred.
The next question is on Motion No. 81. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: The recorded division on Motion No. 81 stands
deferred.
[English]
The next question is on Motion No. 82. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: A recorded division on Motion No. 82 stands
deferred.
The next question is on Motion No. 83. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: A recorded division on Motion No. 83 stands
deferred.
1850
[Translation]
Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg—Transcona, NDP) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing
line 17 on page 5 with the following:
Mr. Yves Rocheleau (Trois-Rivières, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 3, be amended by deleting
lines 18 to 28 on page 5.
Mr. Pat Martin (Winnipeg Centre, NDP) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 3, be amended
(a) by replacing line 25 on page 5 with the following:
“to the borders of the province and, subject to subsection (3),
the rights,”
(b) by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following:
“(3) The Government of Canada shall not negotiate terms of
secession that will alter, erode or jeopardize the rights of the
Aboriginal peoples of Canada unless those peoples have explicitly
consented to the negotiation of such terms.”
Mr. Grant Hill (Macleod, Ref.) moved:
That Bill C-20, in Clause 3, be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following:
“(3) No Minister of the Crown shall propose a
constitutional amendment to effect the secession of a province
from Canada unless the amendment provides that, where there has
been a clear expression of a will by the population of a
municipality in the province, who have cast fifty percent plus
one vote of the votes cast in a referendum in the municipality,
that the province not cease to be part of Canada, the territory
of that municipality shall continue to be part of Canada if (i)
the territory of the municipality is immediately adjacent to the
territory of another province; or (ii) the territory of the
municipality is part of an unbroken chain of municipal
territories in each of which there has been a clear expression of
a will by the population of each municipality, who have cast
fifty percent plus one vote of the votes cast in a referendum in
the municipality, that the province not cease to be part of
Canada, and the territory of at least one of the municipalities
is immediately adjacent to the territory of another province.”
That Bill C-20, in Clause 3, be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following:
“(4) For the purposes of subsection (3) “municipality”
includes a village and a reserve as defined in the Indian Act.”
[English]
The Speaker: The next question is on Motion No. 85. Is
it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: A recorded division on Motion No. 85 stands
deferred.
The next question is on Motion No. 86. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: A recorded division on Motion No. 86 stands
deferred.
1855
The next question is on Motion No. 88. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Speaker: A recorded division on Motion No. 88 stands
deferred.
Mr. Bill Blaikie: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of
order. I apologize for intervening, but I would just like to get
some clarity. As I have it in this guide, it says the question
would be put on Motion No. 85 only if Motion No. 84 is negatived.
You called the question on Motion No. 85, but the same situation
exists with respect to Motions Nos. 87 and 86 where Motion No. 87
is put only if Motion No. 86 is negatived. Yet you did not put
that question.
We have two identical situations, Motion No. 85 only being put
if Motion No. 84 is negatived and Motion No. 87 only being put if
Motion No. 86 is negatived. Yet you put the question on Motion
No. 85 and did not put the question on Motion No. 87. I am not
sure exactly what should have happened.
The Speaker: What happened was that the member who was to
move Motion No. 84 was not here.
Mr. Bill Blaikie: So Motion No. 84 was not grouped apart.
The Speaker: The recorded division will also apply to
Motion No. 89.
[Translation]
Mr. Bill Blaikie (Winnipeg—Transcona, NDP) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. For greater certainty, nothing in this Act shall be
construed so as to abrogate or derogate from the ordinary
political obligations of the House of Commons to give serious
consideration to the outcome of a referendum held in a province
on a question concerning proposals to renew federalism through
non-secessionist constitutional amendments.”
Mrs. Monique Guay (Laurentides, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4.(1) On the expiration of 9 months after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within four years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
1900
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4.(1) On the expiration of 9 months after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within five years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mrs. Pierrette Venne (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of 9 months after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within six years after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of 18 months after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within two years after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Ms. Hélène Alarie (Louis-Hébert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of 18 months after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within three years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mrs. Suzanne Tremblay (Rimouski—Mitis, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of 18 months after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within four years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mrs. Maud Debien (Laval East, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of 18 months after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within five years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
1905
Mr. Yvan Bernier (Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—
Pabok, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended
by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of 18 months after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within six years after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire (Longueuil, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of two years after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within six months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mrs. Monique Guay (Laurentides, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of two years after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within ten months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of two years after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within 14 months after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Maurice Godin (Châteauguay, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of two years after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within two years after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Claude Bachand (Saint-Jean, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of two years after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within three years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
1910
Mr. René Canuel (Matapédia—Matane, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of two years after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within four years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Odina Desrochers (Lotbinière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of 27 months after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within two years after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Daniel Turp (Beauharnois—Salaberry, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of 27 months after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within three years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Bernard Bigras (Rosemont, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of 27 months after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within four years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Antoine Dubé (Lévis-et-Chutes-de-la-Chaudière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line
28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of 27 months after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within five years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Réal Ménard (Hochelaga—Maisonneuve, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of 27 months after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within six years after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
1915
Mrs. Pierrette Venne (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of three years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within six months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of three years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within eight months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Ms. Hélène Alarie (Louis-Hébert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of three years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within ten months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Stéphan Tremblay (Lac-Saint-Jean, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page
5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of three years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within 14 months after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
1920
Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold (Jonquière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of three years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within two years after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of three years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within three years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Pierre de Savoye (Portneuf, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of three years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within four years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mrs. Maud Debien (Laval East, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of four years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within 6 months after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Yvan Bernier (Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok, BQ)
moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended
by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of four years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within eight months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.“
Mr. Maurice Godin (Châteauguay, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of four years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within ten months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Claude Bachand (Saint-Jean, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of four years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within 14 months after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
1925
Mr. Gilles-A. Perron (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of four years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within two years after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of four years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within three years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mrs. Pauline Picard (Drummond, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of four years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within four years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. René Canuel (Matapédia—Matane, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of five years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within six months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold (Jonquière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of five years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within eight months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of five years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within ten months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
1930
Mr. Pierre de Savoye (Portneuf, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of five years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within 14 months after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Gérard Asselin (Charlevoix, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of five years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within two years after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Michel Guimond
(Beauport—Montmorency—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île-d'Orléans, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be
amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new
clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of five years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within three years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien (Frontenac—Mégantic, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of five years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within four years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Gilles-A. Perron (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of six years after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within six months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
1935
Mr. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of six years after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within eight months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mrs. Pauline Picard (Drummond, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of six years after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within ten months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Gérard Asselin (Charlevoix, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of six years after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within 14 months after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau (Repentigny, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of six years after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within two years after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Paul Mercier (Terrebonne—Blainville, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of six years after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within three years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Yves Rocheleau (Trois-Rivières, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of six years after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within four years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
1940
[English]
Mr. Randy White: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.
I am not sure whether I got that last statement right. Was it to
undertake a comprehensive review? I think I missed the last
couple of words.
The Speaker: You are right, that is what it was.
[Translation]
Mr. Michel Guimond
(Beauport—Montmorency—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île-d'Orléans, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of seven years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within six months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien (Frontenac—Mégantic, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of seven years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within eight months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau (Repentigny, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of seven years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within ten months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Paul Mercier (Terrebonne—Blainville, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of seven years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within 14 months after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
1945
Mr. Ghislain Fournier (Manicouagan, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of seven years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within two years after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Maurice Dumas (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after
line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of seven years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within three years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Antoine Dubé (Lévis-et-Chutes-de-la-Chaudière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line
28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of seven years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within four years after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Yves Rocheleau (Trois-Rivières, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of eight years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within six months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Ghislain Fournier (Manicouagan, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of eight years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within eight months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
1950
Mr. Maurice Dumas (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after
line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of eight years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within ten months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of eight years after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within 14 months after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire (Longueuil, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4.(1) On the expiration of 9 months after the coming into
force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within two years after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau (Repentigny, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is four years after
the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mrs. Pauline Picard (Drummond, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force two years after it is assented
to.”
Mrs. Maud Debien (Laval East, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than
March 31, 2005.”
1955
Mr. Paul Mercier (Terrebonne—Blainville, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force three years after it is
assented to.”
Mr. Gérard Asselin (Charlevoix, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force four years after it is
assented to.”
Mr. Michel Guimond
(Beauport—Montmorency—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île-d'Orléans, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be
amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new
clause:
“4. This Act comes into force five years after it is
assented to.”
Mr. Louis Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by
adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than
March 31, 2006.”
Mr. Pierre de Savoye (Portneuf, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force six years after it is assented
to.”
Ms. Hélène Alarie (Louis-Hébert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than
March 31, 2007.”
Mr. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force seven years after it is
assented to.”
Mr. René Canuel (Matapédia—Matane, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force eight years after it is
assented to.”
Mrs. Pierrette Venne (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than
March 31, 2008.”
Mr. Gilles-A. Perron (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force nine years after it is
assented to.”
2000
Mr. Yvan Bernier (Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok, BQ)
moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended
by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than
March 31, 2009.”
Mr. Maurice Godin (Châteauguay, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than
March 31, 2010.”
Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold (Jonquière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force ten years after it is assented
to.”
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than
March 31, 2011.”
Mr. Claude Bachand (Saint-Jean, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than
March 31, 2012.”
Mr. Serge Cardin (Sherbrooke, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than
March 31, 2013.”
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force twelve years after it is
assented to.”
Mr. Antoine Dubé (Lévis-et-Chutes-de-la-Chaudière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line
28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) Two years after this Act comes into force, and every
two years thereafter, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs
shall cause a review to be made of the provisions and the
administration of this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall submit to Parliament
a report on the review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mr. Ghislain Fournier (Manicouagan, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) Two years after this Act comes into force, and every
three years thereafter, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs
shall cause a review to be made of the provisions and the
administration of this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall submit to Parliament
a report on the review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mr. René Canuel (Matapédia—Matane, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 1 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Minister of Justice which day shall be after January 1,
2006, and sections 2 and 3 come into force on a day to be fixed
by order of the Governor in Council which day shall be after
January 1, 2007.”
2005
Mr. Maurice Dumas (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after
line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) Two years after this Act comes into force, and every
four years thereafter, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs
shall cause a review to be made of the provisions and the
administration of this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall submit to Parliament
a report on the review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mr. Maurice Godin (Châteauguay, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Minister of Justice which day shall be after January 1,
2005, and sections 2 and 3 come into force on a day to be fixed
by order of the President of the Privy Council which day shall be
after January 1, 2006.”
Mr. Yves Rocheleau (Trois-Rivières, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) Two years after this Act comes into force, and every
five years thereafter, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs
shall cause a review to be made of the provisions and the
administration of this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall submit to Parliament
a report on the review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Minister of Justice which day shall be after January 1,
2007, and sections 1 and 3 come into force on a day to be fixed
by order of the Governor in Council which day shall be after
January 1, 2006.”
Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold (Jonquière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Minister of Justice which day shall be after January 1,
2006, and sections 1 and 3 come into force on a day to be fixed
by order of the President of the Privy Council which day shall be
after January 1, 2007.”
Mr. Yvan Bernier (Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok,
BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended
by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Minister of Justice which day shall be after January 1,
2005, and sections 1 and 2 come into force on a day to be fixed
by order of the Governor in Council which day shall be after
January 2, 2006.”
2010
Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire (Longueuil, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) One year after this Act comes into force, and every
year thereafter, the Minister of Justice shall cause a review to
be made of the provisions and the administration of this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Justice shall submit to Parliament a report on the
review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Minister of Justice which day shall be after January 1,
2006, and sections 1 and 2 come into force on a day to be fixed
by order of the President of the Privy Council which day shall be
after January 1, 2007.”
Mr. Bernard Bigras (Rosemont, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the date on which this Act is assented to.”
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) One year after this Act comes into force, and every
two years thereafter, the Minister of Justice shall cause a
review to be made of the provisions and the administration of
this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Justice shall submit to Parliament a report on the
review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mr. Odina Desrochers (Lotbinière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the date on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Daniel Turp (Beauharnois—Salaberry, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) One year after this Act comes into force, and every
three years thereafter, the Minister of Justice shall cause a
review to be made of the provisions and the administration of
this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Justice shall submit to Parliament a report on the
review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the date on which this Act is assented to.”
2015
Mr. Bernard Bigras (Rosemont, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the date on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Odina Desrochers (Lotbinière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) One year after this Act comes into force, and every
four years thereafter, the Minister of Justice shall cause a
review to be made of the provisions and the administration of
this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Justice shall submit to Parliament a report on the
review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mr. Yvan Bernier (Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok,
BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended
by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 1 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Governor in Council which day shall be after January 1,
2006, and sections 2 and 3 come into force on a day to be fixed
by order of the Minister of Justice which day shall be after
January 1, 2006.”
Mrs. Pierrette Venne (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is three years
after the date on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the President of the Privy Council which day shall be after
January 1, 2006, and sections 2 and 3 come into force on a day to
be fixed by order of the Minister of Justice which day shall be
after January 1, 2007.”
Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) One year after this Act comes into force, and every
five years thereafter, the Minister of Justice shall cause a
review to be made of the provisions and the administration of
this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Justice shall submit to Parliament a report on the
review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mrs. Monique Guay (Laurentides, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is four years after
the date on which this Act is assented to.”
2020
Mr. Daniel Turp (Beauharnois—Salaberry, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) Two years after this Act comes into force, and every
two years thereafter, the Minister of Justice shall cause a
review to be made of the provisions and the administration of
this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Justice shall submit to Parliament a report on the
review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mrs. Pierrette Venne (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 1 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the President of the Privy Council which day shall be after
January 1, 2007, and sections 2 and 3 come into force on a day to
be fixed by order of the Minister of Justice which day shall be
after January 1, 2008.”
Mr. Claude Bachand (Saint-Jean, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Governor in Council which day shall be after January 1,
2006, and sections 1 and 3 come into force on a day to be fixed
by order of the Minister of Justice which day shall be after
January 1, 2007.”
Mr. Gilles-A. Perron (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the President of the Privy Council which day shall be after
January 1, 2005, and sections 1 and 2 come into force on a day to
be fixed by order of the Minister of Justice which day shall be
after January 1, 2006.”
Mrs. Pauline Picard (Drummond, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order
of the Governor in Council which day shall be after January 1,
2005, and sections 1 and 3 come into force on a day to be fixed
by order of the Minister of Justice which day shall be after
January 2, 2007.”
Mr. Odina Desrochers (Lotbinière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) Two years after this Act comes into force, and every
three years thereafter, the Minister of Justice shall cause a
review to be made of the provisions and the administration of
this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Justice shall submit to Parliament a report on the
review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mr. Réal Ménard (Hochelaga—Maisonneuve, BQ) moved:
“4. (1) Two years after this Act comes into force, and every
four years thereafter, the Minister of Justice shall cause a
review to be made of the provisions and the administration of
this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Justice shall submit to Parliament a report on the
review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mr. Odina Desrochers (Lotbinière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is four
years after the date on which this Act is assented to.”
2025
Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) Two years after this Act comes into force, and every
five years thereafter, the Minister of Justice shall cause a
review to be made of the provisions and the administration of
this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Justice shall submit to Parliament a report on the
review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire (Longueuil, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is four
years after the date on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Serge Cardin (Sherbrooke, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is four
years after the date on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau (Repentigny, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) One year after this Act comes into force, and every
year thereafter, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall
cause a review to be made of the provisions and the
administration of this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall submit to Parliament
a report on the review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mr. Daniel Turp (Beauharnois—Salaberry, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is four
years after the date on which this Act is assented to.”
Mrs. Maud Debien (Laval East, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is five years after
the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Paul Mercier (Terrebonne—Blainville, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is three years
after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
2030
Mr. Maurice Dumas (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after
line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Ghislain Fournier (Manicouagan, BQ) moved:
4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Maurice Dumas (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after
line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien (Frontenac—Mégantic, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) One year after this Act comes into force, and every
two years thereafter, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs
shall cause a review to be made of the provisions and the
administration of this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall submit to Parliament
a report on the review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mr. Yves Rocheleau (Trois-Rivières, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is four
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau (Repentigny, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is four
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
2035
Mr. Paul Mercier (Terrebonne—Blainville, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) One year after this Act comes into force, and every
three years thereafter, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs
shall cause a review to be made of the provisions and the
administration of this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall submit to Parliament
a report on the review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien (Frontenac—Mégantic, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is four
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Antoine Dubé (Lévis-et-Chutes-de-la-Chaudière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line
28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is four
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Ms. Hélène Alarie (Louis-Hébert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Michel Guimond (Beauport—Montmorency—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île-d'Orléans,
BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be
amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new
clause:
“4. (1) One year after this Act comes into force, and every
four years thereafter, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs
shall cause a review to be made of the provisions and the
administration of this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall submit to Parliament
a report on the review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mr. Yves Rocheleau (Trois-Rivières, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is four
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Louis Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by
adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Gérard Asselin (Charlevoix, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) One year after this Act comes into force, and every
five years thereafter, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs
shall cause a review to be made of the provisions and the
administration of this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall submit to Parliament
a report on the review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House
of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose
of reviewing the report.”
Mr. Réal Ménard (Hochelaga—Maisonneuve, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is four years after
the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mrs. Pauline Picard (Drummond, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) Every year, after the coming into force of this Act,
a comprehensive review and assessment of the provisions and
operation of this Act must be undertaken by the committee of the
House of Commons that normally considers justice matters.
(2) The committee must submit a report to Parliament within
a reasonable time after the completion of its review and
assessment.”
2040
Mr. Gilles-A. Perron (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) Every two years, after the coming into force of this
Act, a comprehensive review and assessment of the provisions and
operation of this Act must be undertaken by the committee of the
House of Commons that normally considers justice matters.
(2) The committee must submit a report to Parliament within
a reasonable time after the completion of its review and
assessment.”
Mr. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. René Canuel (Matapédia—Matane, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) Every three years, after the coming into force of
this Act, a comprehensive review and assessment of the provisions
and operation of this Act must be undertaken by the committee of
the House of Commons that normally considers justice matters.
(2) The committee must submit a report to Parliament within
a reasonable time after the completion of its review and
assessment.”
Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold (Jonquière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) Every four years, after the coming into force of
this Act, a comprehensive review and assessment of the provisions
and operation of this Act must be undertaken by the committee of
the House of Commons that normally considers justice matters.
(2) The committee must submit a report to Parliament within
a reasonable time after the completion of its review and
assessment.”
Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire (Longueuil, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Pierre de Savoye (Portneuf, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) Every five years, after the coming into force of
this Act, a comprehensive review and assessment of the provisions
and operation of this Act must be undertaken by the committee of
the House of Commons that normally considers justice matters.
(2) The committee must submit a report to Parliament within
a reasonable time after the completion of its review and
assessment.”
Mr. Gilles-A. Perron (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven years
after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. René Canuel (Matapédia—Matane, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold (Jonquière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) Every year, after the coming into force of this Act,
a comprehensive review and assessment of the provisions and
operation of this Act must be undertaken by the committee of the
House of Commons that normally considers matters relating to
procedure and House affairs.
(2) The committee must submit a report to Parliament within
a reasonable time after the completion of its review and
assessment.”
2045
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) Every two years, after the coming into force of this
Act, a comprehensive review and assessment of the provisions and
operation of this Act must be undertaken by the committee of the
House of Commons that normally considers matters relating to
procedure and House affairs.
(2) The committee must submit a report to Parliament within
a reasonable time after the completion of its review and
assessment.”
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.
We greatly appreciate your reading the various motions, but
would it be possible for you to indicate motion numbers so that
we could follow along more easily?
The Deputy Speaker: If I change the order, I will, but I am at
Motion No. 236 and I am going to continue to follow the order
for a few more minutes.
Mr. Pierre de Savoye (Portneuf, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Maurice Godin (Châteauguay, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) Every three years, after the coming into force of
this Act, a comprehensive review and assessment of the provisions
and operation of this Act must be undertaken by the committee of
the House of Commons that normally considers matters relating to
procedure and House affairs.
(2) The committee must submit a report to Parliament within
a reasonable time after the completion of its review and
assessment.”
Mr. Yvan Bernier (Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok, BQ)
moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended
by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) Every four years, after the coming into force of
this Act, a comprehensive review and assessment of the provisions
and operation of this Act must be undertaken by the committee of
the House of Commons that normally considers matters relating to
procedure and House affairs.
(2) The committee must submit a report to Parliament within
a reasonable time after the completion of its review and
assessment.”
Mrs. Monique Guay (Laurentides, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Claude Bachand (Saint-Jean, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) Every five years, after the coming into force of
this Act, a comprehensive review and assessment of the provisions
and operation of this Act must be undertaken by the committee of
the House of Commons that normally considers matters relating to
procedure and House affairs.
(2) The committee must submit a report to Parliament within
a reasonable time after the completion of its review and
assessment.”
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Serge Cardin (Sherbrooke, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mrs. Maud Debien (Laval East, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
2050
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Maurice Godin (Châteauguay, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten years after
the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Ms. Hélène Alarie (Louis-Hébert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mrs. Pauline Picard (Drummond, BQ) ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is five years after
the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Louis Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by
adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Yvan Bernier (Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok,
BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended
by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which it is assented to, and sections 2
and 3 shall come into force on a day that is ten years after the
day on which it is assented to.”
Mr. Claude Bachand (Saint-Jean, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 1 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 2 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is two years after
the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Pierre de Savoye (Portneuf, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Gilles-A. Perron (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Antoine Dubé (Lévis-et-Chutes-de-la-Chaudière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line
28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Gérard Asselin (Charlevoix, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven years
after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
2055
Mr. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Michel Guimond
(Beauport—Montmorency—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île-d'Orléans, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be
amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new
clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Pierre de Savoye (Portneuf, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Michel Guimond
(Beauport—Montmorency—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île-d'Orléans, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be
amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new
clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Réal Ménard (Hochelaga—Maisonneuve, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien (Frontenac—Mégantic, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau (Repentigny, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Paul Mercier (Terrebonne—Blainville, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which it is assented to, and sections 1 and
3 shall come into force on the day that is ten years after the
day on which this it assented to.”
Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien (Frontenac—Mégantic, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. One year after the coming into force of this Act, the
committee of the House of Commons that normally considers matters
relating to intergovernmental affairs shall undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act,
and shall within a year after the review is undertaken or within
such further time as the House of Commons may authorize, submit a
report to Parliament thereon including a statement of any changes
the committee would recommend.”
Mr. Ghislain Fournier (Manicouagan, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
2100
Mr. René Canuel (Matapédia—Matane, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Maurice Dumas (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after
line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Two years after the coming into force of this Act, the
committee of the House of Commons that normally considers matters
relating to intergovernmental affairs shall undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act,
and shall within a year after the review is undertaken or within
such further time as the House of Commons may authorize, submit a
report to Parliament thereon including a statement of any changes
the committee would recommend.”
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Antoine Dubé (Lévis-et-Chutes-de-la-Chaudière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line
28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Three years after the coming into force of this Act, the
committee of the House of Commons that normally considers matters
relating to intergovernmental affairs shall undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act,
and shall within a year after the review is undertaken or within
such further time as the House of Commons may authorize, submit a
report to Parliament thereon including a statement of any changes
the committee would recommend.”
Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold (Jonquière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Yves Rocheleau (Trois-Rivières, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Five years after the coming into force of this Act, the
committee of the House of Commons that normally considers matters
relating to intergovernmental affairs shall undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act,
and shall within a year after the review is undertaken or within
such further time as the House of Commons may authorize, submit a
report to Parliament thereon including a statement of any changes
the committee would recommend.”
Mrs. Maud Debien (Laval East, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is two years after
the day on which this Act is assented to.”
2105
Mr. Ghislain Fournier (Manicouagan, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Seven years after the coming into force of this Act, the
committee of the House of Commons that normally considers matters
relating to intergovernmental affairs shall undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act,
and shall within a year after the review is undertaken or within
such further time as the House of Commons may authorize, submit a
report to Parliament thereon including a statement of any changes
the committee would recommend.”
Mr. Yvan Bernier (Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok,
BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended
by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Serge Cardin (Sherbrooke, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is three years
after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Claude Bachand (Saint-Jean, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Ms. Hélène Alarie (Louis-Hébert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Not later than March 31, 2001, the committee of the
House of Commons that normally considers matters relating to
intergovernmental affairs shall undertake a comprehensive review
of the provisions and operation of this Act, and shall within a
year after the review is undertaken or within such further time
as the House of Commons may authorize, submit a report to
Parliament thereon including a statement of any changes the
committee would recommend.”
Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire (Longueuil, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mrs. Monique Guay (Laurentides, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Not later than January 1, 2002, the committee of the
House of Commons that normally considers matters relating to
intergovernmental affairs shall undertake a comprehensive review
of the provisions and operation of this Act, and shall within a
year after the review is undertaken or within such further time
as the House of Commons may authorize, submit a report to
Parliament thereon including a statement of any changes the
committee would recommend.”
2110
Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold (Jonquière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Louis Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by
adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Not later than January 1, 2004, the committee of the
House of Commons that normally considers matters relating to
intergovernmental affairs shall undertake a comprehensive review
of the provisions and operation of this Act, and shall within a
year after the review is undertaken or within such further time
as the House of Commons may authorize, submit a report to
Parliament thereon including a statement of any changes the
committee would recommend.”
Mr. Réal Ménard (Hochelaga—Maisonneuve, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. One year after the coming into force of this Act, a
committee established or designated by the House of Commons shall
undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation
of this Act, and shall within a year after the review is
undertaken or within such further time as the House of Commons
may authorize, submit a report to Parliament thereon including a
statement of any changes the committee would recommend.”
Ms. Hélène Alarie (Louis-Hébert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is ten years after
the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mrs. Pierrette Venne (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Not later than January 1, 2005, the committee of the
House of Commons that normally considers matters relating to
intergovernmental affairs shall undertake a comprehensive review
of the provisions and operation of this Act, and shall within a
year after the review is undertaken or within such further time
as the House of Commons may authorize, submit a report to
Parliament thereon including a statement of any changes the
committee would recommend.”
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Not later than March 31, 2001, the committee of the
House of Commons that normally considers justice matters shall
undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation
of this Act, and shall within a year after the review is
undertaken or within such further time as the House of Commons
may authorize, submit a report to Parliament thereon including a
statement of any changes the committee would recommend.”
Mr. Louis Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour, BQ)
moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by
adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Ghislain Fournier (Manicouagan, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Two years after the coming into force of this Act, a
committee established or designated by the House of Commons shall
undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation
of this Act, and shall within a year after the review is
undertaken or within such further time as the House of Commons
may authorize, submit a report to Parliament thereon including a
statement of any changes the committee would recommend.”
2115
Mr. Claude Bachand (Saint-Jean, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Three years after the coming into force of this Act, a
committee established or designated by the House of Commons shall
undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation
of this Act, and shall within a year after the review is
undertaken or within such further time as the House of Commons
may authorize, submit a report to Parliament thereon including a
statement of any changes the committee would recommend.”
Mr. René Canuel (Matapédia—Matane, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Maurice Dumas (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after
line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Five years after the coming into force of this Act, a
committee established or designated by the House of Commons shall
undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation
of this Act, and shall within a year after the review is
undertaken or within such further time as the House of Commons
may authorize, submit a report to Parliament thereon including a
statement of any changes the committee would recommend.”
Mr. Bernard Bigras (Rosemont, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Ten years after the coming into force of this Act, a
committee established or designated by the House of Commons shall
undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation
of this Act, and shall within a year after the review is
undertaken or within such further time as the House of Commons
may authorize, submit a report to Parliament thereon including a
statement of any changes the committee would recommend.”
Mrs. Maud Debien (Laval East, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Not later than January 1, 2004, the committee of the
House of Commons that normally considers justice matters shall
undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation
of this Act, and shall within a year after the review is
undertaken or within such further time as the House of Commons
may authorize, submit a report to Parliament thereon including a
statement of any changes the committee would recommend.”
2120
Mr. Serge Cardin (Sherbrooke, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Not later than January 1, 2005, the committee of the
House of Commons that normally considers justice matters shall
undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation
of this Act, and shall within a year after the review is
undertaken or within such further time as the House of Commons
may authorize, submit a report to Parliament thereon including a
statement of any changes the committee would recommend.”
Mr. Daniel Turp (Beauharnois—Salaberry, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is five years after
the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mrs. Pierrette Venne (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Ms. Hélène Alarie (Louis-Hébert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Serge Cardin (Sherbrooke, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Louis Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by
adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Bernard Bigras (Rosemont, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Maurice Godin (Châteauguay, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mrs. Monique Guay (Laurentides, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Odina Desrochers (Lotbinière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is four
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Bernard Bigras (Rosemont, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is four
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mrs. Maud Debien (Laval East, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is one
year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections
1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven years
after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
2125
Mrs. Pierrette Venne (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is four
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Maurice Godin (Châteauguay, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is two
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mrs. Monique Guay (Laurentides, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is four
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Daniel Turp (Beauharnois—Salaberry, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is four
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is three
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Odina Desrochers (Lotbinière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is five
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire (Longueuil, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten
years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and
sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven
years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
Mr. Bernard Bigras (Rosemont, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on February 1, 2005.”
Mr. Daniel Turp (Beauharnois—Salaberry, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on March 1, 2005.”
Mr. Odina Desrochers (Lotbinière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on April 1, 2005.”
Mrs. Monique Guay (Laurentides, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on May 1, 2005.”
Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire (Longueuil, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on June 1, 2005.”
Mr. Odina Desrochers (Lotbinière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on July 1, 2005.”
2130
Mr. Daniel Turp (Beauharnois—Salaberry, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on August 1, 2005.”
Mr. Bernard Bigras (Rosemont, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on September 1, 2005.”
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau (Repentigny, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on October 1, 2005.”
Mr. Serge Cardin (Sherbrooke, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on November 1, 2005.”
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on December 1, 2005.”
Mrs. Monique Guay (Laurentides, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on February 1, 2006.”
Mrs. Pierrette Venne (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on March 1, 2006.”
Mr. Yvan Bernier (Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok, BQ)
moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended
by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on April 1, 2006.”
Mrs. Maud Debien (Laval East, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on May 1, 2006.”
Mr. Louis Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by
adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on June 1, 2006.”
Ms. Hélène Alarie (Louis-Hébert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on July 1, 2006.”
Mr. Maurice Godin (Châteauguay, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on August 1, 2006.”
Mr. Claude Bachand (Saint-Jean, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on September 1, 2006.”
Mr. René Canuel (Matapédia—Matane, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on October 1, 2006.”
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on November 1, 2006.”
Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold (Jonquière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on December 1, 2006.”
2135
Mr. Pierre de Savoye (Portneuf, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on January 1, 2007.”
Mr. Gilles-A. Perron (Rivière-des-Mille-îles) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on February 1, 2007.”
Mr. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on March 1, 2007.”
Mrs. Pauline Picard (Drummond, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on April 1, 2007.”
Mr. Michel Guimond (Beauport—Montmorency—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île-d'Orléans,
BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be
amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new
clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on May 1, 2007.”
Mr. Gérard Asselin (Charlevoix, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on June 1, 2007.”
Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien (Frontenac—Mégantic, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on July 1, 2007.”
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau (Repentigny, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on August 1, 2007.”
Mr. Paul Mercier (Terrebonne—Blainville, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on September 1, 2007.”
Mr. Yves Rocheleau (Trois-Rivières, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on October 1, 2007.”
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on November 1, 2007.”
Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on December 1, 2007.”
Mr. Serge Cardin (Sherbrooke, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on October 1, 2008.”
Mr. Réal Ménard (Hochelaga—Maisonneuve, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on January 1, 2008.”
2140
Ms. Hélène Alarie (Louis-Hébert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on November 1, 2008.”
Mr. Ghislain Fournier (Manicouagan, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on February 1, 2008.”
Mrs. Maud Debien (Laval East, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on December 1, 2008.”
Mr. Maurice Dumas (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after
line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on March 1, 2008.”
Mrs. Pierrette Venne (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on January 1, 2009.”
Mr. Louis Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by
adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on February 1, 2009.”
Mr. Bernard Bigras (Rosemont, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on April 1, 2008.”
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on March 1, 2009.”
Mr. Yvan Bernier (Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok, BQ)
moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended
by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on April 1, 2009.”
Ms. Caroline St-Hilaire (Longueuil, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on May 1, 2008.”
Mr. René Canuel (Matapédia—Matane, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on May 1, 2009.”
Ms. Jocelyne Girard-Bujold (Jonquière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on June 1, 2009.”
Mr. Maurice Godin (Châteauguay, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on July 1, 2009.”
2145
Mr. Daniel Turp (Beauharnois—Salaberry, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on July 1, 2008.”
He said: Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I am asking for the
unanimous consent of the House to withdraw Bill C-20.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Folco): Is there unanimous consent in
the House?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on August 1, 2009.”
Mr. Claude Bachand (Saint-Jean, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on September 1, 2009.”
Mrs. Monique Guay (Laurentides, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on August 1, 2008.”
Mr. Pierre de Savoye (Portneuf, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on October 1, 2009.”
Mr. Gérard Asselin (Charlevoix, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on November 1, 2009.”
Mr. Odina Desrochers (Lotbinière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on September 1, 2008.”
Mr. Gilles-A. Perron (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on December 1, 2009.”
Mrs. Pauline Picard (Drummond, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on January 1, 2010.”
Mr. Michel Guimond
(Beauport—Montmorency—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île-d'Orléans, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be
amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new
clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on February 1, 2010.”
Mr. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on March 1, 2010.”
Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien (Frontenac—Mégantic, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on April 1, 2010.”
Mr. Maurice Dumas (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after
line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on January 1, 2011.”
Mr. Paul Mercier (Terrebonne—Blainville, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on May 1, 2010.”
Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on February 1, 2011.”
Mr. Antoine Dubé (Lévis-et-Chutes-de-la-Chaudière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line
28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on March 1, 2011.”
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau (Repentigny, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on June 1, 2010.”
2150
Mr. Réal Ménard (Hochelaga—Maisonneuve, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on April 1, 2011.”
Mr. Yves Rocheleau (Trois-Rivières, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on July 1, 2010.”
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on May 1, 2011.”
Mr. Ghislain Fournier (Manicouagan, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on June 1, 2011.”
Mrs. Pauline Picard (Drummond, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on July 1, 2011.”
Mr. Ghislain Fournier (Manicouagan, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on August 1, 2010.”
Mr. Michel Guimond
(Beauport—Montmorency—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île-d'Orléans, BQ)
moved:
That Bill C-20 be
amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new
clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on August 1, 2011.”
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau (Repentigny, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on September 1, 2011.”
Mr. Maurice Dumas (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after
line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on September 1, 2010.”
Mr. Jean-Guy Chrétien (Frontenac—Mégantic, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on October 1, 2011.”
Mr. Réal Ménard (Hochelaga—Maisonneuve, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on October 1, 2010.”
Mr. Gérard Asselin (Charlevoix, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on November 1, 2011.”
Mr. Antoine Dubé (Lévis-et-Chutes-de-la-Chaudière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line
28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on November 1, 2010.”
Mr. Paul Mercier (Terrebonne—Blainville, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on December 1, 2011.”
Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on December 1, 2010.”
Mr. Serge Cardin (Sherbrooke, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. Notwithstanding sections 1, 2 and 3, where the
population of Quebec is consulted by a referendum, the winning
option is the one that obtains a majority of the votes found to
be valid, or fifty percent plus one vote.”
Mr. Bernard Bigras (Rosemont, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of nine months after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within 14 months after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
2155
Mr. Richard Marceau (Charlesbourg, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of six months after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within five months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Odina Desrochers (Lotbinière, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of nine months after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within six months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Yvan Bernier (Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok,
BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended
by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of three months after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within six months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of nine months after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within eight months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Ghislain Lebel (Chambly, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of three months after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within 14 months after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. René Canuel (Matapédia—Matane, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on
page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of six months after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within eight months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mrs. Pierrette Venne (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of three months after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within ten months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau (Repentigny, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of six months after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within ten months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
2200
Mr. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ) moved:
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of three months after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within eight months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
That
Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the
following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of three months after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within ten months after the review is undertaken
submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Paul Mercier (Terrebonne—Blainville, BQ) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of five months after the coming
into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be
referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be
designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose
of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a
comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act
and shall, within 14 months after the review is undertaken submit
a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
Mr. Peter MacKay (Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough, PC) moved:
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28
on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Notwithstanding anything aforementioned in this Act,
this legislation shall not be construed in a manner which would
prevent the renewal of the federation.”
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): The question is on
Motion No. 90. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the
motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): The recorded division
on the Motion No. 90 stands deferred.
The next question is on Motion. No. 91.
2205
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): The recorded division
on Motion No. 91 stands deferred.
The next question is on Motion No. 150. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): The recorded division
on Motion No. 150 stands deferred.
The next question is on Motion. No. 398. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): The recorded division
on Motion No. 398 stands deferred.
The next question is on Motion No. 411. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour of
the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 411 lost.
(Motion No. 411 negatived)
[Translation]
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron: Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I
seek unanimous consent to have all the motions in amendment
carried on division.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): Is there unanimous consent
in the House?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): The House will now proceed
to the taking of the recorded divisions deferred at the report
stage of Bill C-20.
Call in the members.
2235
[English]
And the bells having rung:
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): The first question is
on Motion No. 1.
(The House divided on Motion No. 1, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 41
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Assad
| Assadourian
|
Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Bennett
| Bertrand
| Bevilacqua
|
Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Bonwick
|
Borotsik
| Bradshaw
| Breitkreuz
(Yorkton – Melville)
| Brown
|
Bryden
| Bulte
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Cannis
| Caplan
| Casey
| Catterall
|
Cauchon
| Chan
| Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Clouthier
| Coderre
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
|
Copps
| Cotler
| Cullen
| Davies
|
Desjarlais
| DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
| Dion
|
Discepola
| Dromisky
| Drouin
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Easter
| Eggleton
| Folco
|
Fontana
| Fry
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
|
Gilmour
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
|
Gouk
| Grewal
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Guarnieri
|
Hanger
| Harb
| Hardy
| Hart
|
Harvard
| Harvey
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Hubbard
|
Ianno
| Iftody
| Jackson
| Jennings
|
Johnston
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
|
Keyes
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Knutson
| Kraft Sloan
|
Lastewka
| Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
|
Longfield
| Lunn
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Mahoney
| Malhi
| Maloney
| Manley
|
Mark
| Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
|
Mayfield
| McCormick
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
McTeague
| McWhinney
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
|
Minna
| Mitchell
| Murray
| Myers
|
Nault
| Normand
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| O'Reilly
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
|
Parrish
| Patry
| Peric
| Phinney
|
Pratt
| Proctor
| Proud
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Redman
| Reed
| Richardson
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Sekora
| Sgro
| Shepherd
| Solberg
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Steckle
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Strahl
| Szabo
|
Telegdi
| Torsney
| Ur
| Valeri
|
Vanclief
| Volpe
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan
| Wilfert
| Wood
– 163
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 1 lost.
2240
The next question is on the amendment to Motion No. 2.
2245
(The House divided on the amendment, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Blaikie
|
Breitkreuz
(Yorkton – Melville)
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| Davies
| de Savoye
|
Debien
| Desjarlais
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Earle
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Gilmour
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Gouk
| Grewal
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Hanger
| Hardy
| Hart
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Johnston
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Lunn
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Mark
| Mayfield
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Nystrom
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Proctor
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Solberg
| St - Hilaire
| Strahl
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
|
Wasylycia - Leis – 65
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Assad
| Assadourian
|
Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Bennett
| Bertrand
| Bevilacqua
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Bonwick
| Borotsik
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Bryden
| Bulte
|
Caccia
| Calder
| Cannis
| Caplan
|
Carroll
| Casey
| Catterall
| Cauchon
|
Chan
| Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
|
Coderre
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Copps
|
Cotler
| Cullen
| DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
|
Dion
| Discepola
| Dromisky
| Drouin
|
Duhamel
| Easter
| Eggleton
| Finlay
|
Folco
| Fontana
| Fry
| Gagliano
|
Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Goodale
| Guarnieri
|
Harb
| Harvard
| Harvey
| Hubbard
|
Ianno
| Iftody
| Jackson
| Jennings
|
Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Knutson
| Kraft Sloan
| Lastewka
|
Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mahoney
| Malhi
|
Maloney
| Manley
| Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Matthews
| McCormick
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
McTeague
| McWhinney
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
|
Minna
| Mitchell
| Murray
| Myers
|
Nault
| Normand
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
O'Reilly
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
| Parrish
|
Patry
| Peric
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Pratt
| Proud
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Redman
| Reed
| Richardson
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Sgro
| Shepherd
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
St - Julien
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Szabo
| Telegdi
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Vanclief
| Volpe
| Wappel
|
Whelan
| Wilfert
| Wood – 143
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare the
amendment to Motion No. 2 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 2.
2255
(The House divided on Motion No. 2, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Blaikie
|
Breitkreuz
(Yorkton – Melville)
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| Davies
| de Savoye
|
Debien
| Desjarlais
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Earle
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Gilmour
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Gouk
| Grewal
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Hanger
| Hardy
| Hart
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Johnston
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Mark
| Mayfield
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Nystrom
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Proctor
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Solberg
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
| Wasylycia - Leis – 62
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Assad
| Assadourian
|
Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Bennett
| Bertrand
| Bevilacqua
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Bonwick
| Borotsik
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Bryden
| Bulte
|
Caccia
| Calder
| Cannis
| Caplan
|
Carroll
| Casey
| Catterall
| Cauchon
|
Chan
| Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
|
Coderre
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Copps
|
Cotler
| Cullen
| DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
|
Dion
| Discepola
| Dromisky
| Drouin
|
Duhamel
| Easter
| Eggleton
| Finlay
|
Folco
| Fontana
| Fry
| Gagliano
|
Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Goodale
| Guarnieri
|
Harb
| Harvard
| Harvey
| Hubbard
|
Ianno
| Iftody
| Jackson
| Jennings
|
Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Knutson
| Kraft Sloan
| Lastewka
|
Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mahoney
| Malhi
|
Maloney
| Manley
| Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Matthews
| McCormick
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
McTeague
| McWhinney
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
|
Minna
| Mitchell
| Murray
| Myers
|
Nault
| Normand
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
O'Reilly
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
| Parrish
|
Patry
| Peric
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Pratt
| Proud
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Redman
| Reed
| Richardson
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Sgro
| Shepherd
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
St - Julien
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Szabo
| Telegdi
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Vanclief
| Volpe
| Wappel
|
Whelan
| Wilfert
| Wood – 143
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 2 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 3.
2300
(The House divided on Motion No. 3, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 41
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assad
| Assadourian
| Augustine
|
Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Bakopanos
|
Bélair
| Bertrand
| Bevilacqua
| Blaikie
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bradshaw
| Breitkreuz
(Yorkton – Melville)
| Caccia
|
Caplan
| Casey
| Cauchon
| Chan
|
Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Comuzzi
| Copps
| Cullen
| Davies
|
Desjarlais
| Dhaliwal
| Dion
| Dromisky
|
Duhamel
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Fontana
|
Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Gouk
|
Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Harb
|
Hardy
| Hart
| Harvard
| Harvey
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
| Johnston
|
Karygiannis
| Keyes
| Knutson
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Manley
| Mark
| Marleau
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Mayfield
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Minna
| Mitchell
| Nault
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Proctor
| Proud
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solberg
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
St - Julien
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Vanclief
|
Volpe
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Williams – 88
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 3 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 4. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2310
(The House divided on Motion No. 4, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Dumas
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne – 38
|
NAYS
Members
Assad
| Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bélair
|
Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Benoit
| Bertrand
|
Blaikie
| Bonin
| Brown
| Bryden
|
Caccia
| Cadman
| Calder
| Cannis
|
Casey
| Cauchon
| Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Copps
| Cullen
|
Davies
| Desjarlais
| DeVillers
| Discepola
|
Dromisky
| Earle
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Finlay
| Fontana
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Grewal
| Guarnieri
|
Harb
| Hardy
| Harvard
| Harvey
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Hubbard
| Ianno
|
Iftody
| Jackson
| Johnston
| Knutson
|
Kraft Sloan
| Lastewka
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
| Maloney
|
Manley
| Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| McCormick
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McTeague
| McWhinney
| Mifflin
|
Murray
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| O'Reilly
|
Paradis
| Parrish
| Peric
| Phinney
|
Proctor
| Reed
| Richardson
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solberg
|
Speller
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Telegdi
|
Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 95
|
PAIRED
Members
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 4 lost.
The next question is on the amendment to Motion No. 5. Is the
pleasure of the House to adopt the amendment?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the amendment will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2320
(The House divided on the amendment, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 41
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Assad
| Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bélair
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Bennett
|
Benoit
| Bonwick
| Borotsik
| Bulte
|
Cadman
| Carroll
| Casey
| Cauchon
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
|
Copps
| Cotler
| Davies
| Desjarlais
|
Earle
| Easter
| Eggleton
| Finlay
|
Folco
| Fontana
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Grewal
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hardy
| Harvard
|
Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Hubbard
|
Jackson
| Jennings
| Johnston
| Jordan
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
| Lastewka
| Leung
|
Limoges
| Longfield
| Lunn
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mahoney
| Malhi
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
|
McCormick
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McTeague
|
McWhinney
| Mifflin
| Murray
| Myers
|
Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| O'Reilly
| Parrish
|
Peric
| Pratt
| Proctor
| Provenzano
|
Redman
| Reed
| Richardson
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Sgro
|
Shepherd
| Steckle
| Szabo
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 96
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare the
amendment to Motion No. 5 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 5. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2325
(The House divided on Motion No. 5, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 41
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assad
| Assadourian
| Augustine
|
Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Bakopanos
|
Bélair
| Bellemare
| Bertrand
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Borotsik
| Cadman
| Caplan
| Casey
|
Cauchon
| Chan
| Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Coderre
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Copps
|
Desjarlais
| Dion
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Fontana
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Guarnieri
| Hanger
|
Harb
| Hardy
| Harvard
| Harvey
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Ianno
| Johnston
| Karygiannis
|
Keyes
| Lunn
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Mancini
| Manley
| Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
|
Minna
| Mitchell
| Nault
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Proctor
| Proud
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Volpe
| Wappel
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Williams – 74
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 5 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 6. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2330
(The House divided on Motion No. 6, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 41
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Assad
| Axworthy
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Benoit
| Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Borotsik
| Cadman
| Casey
| Cauchon
|
Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Comuzzi
| Copps
| Cotler
| Desjarlais
|
Dion
| Duhamel
| Earle
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Finlay
| Fontana
| Fry
|
Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Harb
|
Hardy
| Harvard
| Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Hubbard
| Jackson
| Johnston
| Karygiannis
|
Keyes
| Kraft Sloan
| Lastewka
| Longfield
|
Lunn
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
|
Mancini
| Manley
| Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McTeague
|
McWhinney
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
|
Murray
| Normand
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
O'Reilly
| Pagtakhan
| Parrish
| Peric
|
Proctor
| Proud
| Proulx
| Reed
|
Richardson
| Robillard
| Rock
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
St - Julien
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Williams – 87
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 6 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 7. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2335
(The House divided on Motion No. 7, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 41
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assad
| Augustine
| Axworthy
|
Baker
| Bakopanos
| Bélair
| Bellemare
|
Benoit
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Borotsik
| Cadman
| Casey
| Cauchon
|
Chan
| Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Copps
| Cullen
|
Desjarlais
| Dion
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Harb
|
Harvard
| Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
|
Karygiannis
| Keyes
| Knutson
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mancini
| Manley
| Marleau
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
| Nault
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| Peric
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proctor
|
Proud
| Robillard
| Rock
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Williams
– 69
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 7 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 8. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the nays
have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2345
(The House divided on Motion No. 8, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 41
|
NAYS
Members
Assad
| Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bellemare
|
Benoit
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Borotsik
| Brown
| Bryden
| Cadman
|
Calder
| Cannis
| Casey
| Cauchon
|
Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
|
Copps
| Cullen
| Desjarlais
| DeVillers
|
Discepola
| Dromisky
| Earle
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Finlay
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Hanger
|
Hardy
| Harvard
| Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Hubbard
| Jackson
| Johnston
| Knutson
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Nystrom
| Paradis
|
Phinney
| Proctor
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Williams – 71
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 8 lost.
The next question is on the amendment to Motion No. 9. Is it
the pleasure of the House to adopt the amendment?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the amendment will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2350
(The House divided on the amendment, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 41
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Assad
| Axworthy
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Beaumier
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Benoit
| Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Brown
| Bryden
|
Cadman
| Calder
| Cannis
| Casey
|
Cauchon
| Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Copps
| Cotler
|
Desjarlais
| DeVillers
| Dion
| Discepola
|
Duhamel
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Fry
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Hanger
|
Hardy
| Harvard
| Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Jackson
| Johnston
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
|
Nault
| Normand
| Nystrom
| Paradis
|
Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proctor
| Reed
|
Richardson
| Robillard
| Rock
| Saada
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Torsney
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Williams – 77
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare the
amendment to Motion No. 9 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 9. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed to
the motion will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2355
(The House divided on Motion No. 9, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 41
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Assad
| Augustine
| Axworthy
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Benoit
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Brown
| Bryden
|
Cadman
| Calder
| Cannis
| Casey
|
Cauchon
| Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
|
Comuzzi
| Copps
| Cullen
| Desjarlais
|
Dromisky
| Earle
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Finlay
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Hardy
| Harvard
| Harvey
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Iftody
| Jackson
|
Johnston
| Kraft Sloan
| Longfield
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Nystrom
| Paradis
| Phinney
| Proctor
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Williams
– 69
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 9 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 10. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
2400
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2405
(The House divided on Motion No. 10, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne – 35
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Assad
| Assadourian
| Augustine
|
Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bakopanos
| Beaumier
|
Bélair
| Benoit
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Brown
| Bryden
|
Cadman
| Calder
| Cannis
| Casey
|
Cauchon
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
|
Copps
| Cotler
| Cullen
| Desjarlais
|
Discepola
| Dromisky
| Earle
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Finlay
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Hardy
| Harvard
|
Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Iftody
|
Jackson
| Johnston
| Kraft Sloan
| Longfield
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
McWhinney
| Myers
| Nystrom
| Paradis
|
Peric
| Phinney
| Proctor
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Redman
| Reed
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Saada
| Sekora
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| Telegdi
| Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Wilfert – 77
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 10 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 11. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed to the motion will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2410
(The House divided on Motion No. 11, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Assad
| Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bélair
|
Bélanger
| Bennett
| Benoit
| Blaikie
|
Bonwick
| Borotsik
| Bulte
| Cadman
|
Casey
| Cauchon
| Clouthier
| Collenette
|
Comuzzi
| Copps
| Desjarlais
| Earle
|
Easter
| Eggleton
| Finlay
| Folco
|
Fontana
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Guarnieri
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Johnston
|
Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
| Longfield
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McWhinney
| Mifflin
|
Myers
| Peric
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Redman
| Reed
| Robillard
| Sekora
|
Shepherd
| Steckle
| Stoffer
| Telegdi
|
Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wilfert
| Williams – 68
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 11 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 12. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2415
(The House divided on Motion No. 12, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assad
| Assadourian
| Augustine
|
Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Bakopanos
|
Bélair
| Benoit
| Bertrand
| Bevilacqua
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Borotsik
| Cadman
| Casey
|
Cauchon
| Chan
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Comuzzi
| Copps
| Cullen
| Desjarlais
|
Dion
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Fontana
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Guarnieri
| Hanger
|
Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
|
Keyes
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Nault
|
Normand
| Paradis
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Robillard
|
St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Torsney
|
Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Williams – 63
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 12 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 13.
2420
(The House divided on Motion No. 13, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assad
| Assadourian
| Augustine
|
Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Bakopanos
|
Bélair
| Benoit
| Bertrand
| Bevilacqua
|
Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
| Borotsik
| Bryden
|
Cadman
| Cannis
| Casey
| Cauchon
|
Chan
| Coderre
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
|
Copps
| Cullen
| DeVillers
| Dion
|
Discepola
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Gruending
| Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
|
Jackson
| Johnston
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
|
Laliberte
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
|
Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Mitchell
| Nault
|
Normand
| Paradis
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Robillard
| Rock
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
|
Stoffer
| Torsney
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Williams – 73
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 13 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 14.
2425
(The House divided on Motion No. 14, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Assad
| Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bélair
|
Bélanger
| Bennett
| Benoit
| Bonwick
|
Borotsik
| Bulte
| Cadman
| Casey
|
Cauchon
| Clouthier
| Collenette
| Cotler
|
Earle
| Easter
| Eggleton
| Godfrey
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Guarnieri
|
Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
| Harvey
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Jackson
| Johnston
|
Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Longfield
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
McTeague
| McWhinney
| Mifflin
| Myers
|
O'Reilly
| Parrish
| Peric
| Proulx
|
Redman
| Reed
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Sekora
| Shepherd
| Steckle
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
|
Williams – 65
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 14 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 15.
2430
(The House divided on Motion No. 15, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assad
| Augustine
| Axworthy
|
Baker
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Benoit
|
Bertrand
| Blaikie
| Bonin
| Borotsik
|
Bryden
| Cadman
| Calder
| Cannis
|
Casey
| Cauchon
| Chan
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Cullen
| Desjarlais
| DeVillers
|
Discepola
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
|
Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
|
Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Jackson
|
Johnston
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
| Maloney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McTeague
|
McWhinney
| Mifflin
| Mitchell
| Nault
|
Normand
| Paradis
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Rock
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
|
Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Williams – 67
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 15 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 18.
2435
(The House divided on Motion No. 18, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
|
Beaumier
| Bélair
| Benoit
| Bertrand
|
Bevilacqua
| Blaikie
| Borotsik
| Bryden
|
Cadman
| Calder
| Cannis
| Casey
|
Cauchon
| Chan
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Comuzzi
| Cullen
| Desjarlais
| DeVillers
|
Dion
| Discepola
| Dromisky
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
| Guarnieri
|
Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
| Harvey
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Jackson
| Johnston
|
Karygiannis
| Keyes
| Longfield
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Mitchell
|
Nault
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Rock
|
St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Telegdi
|
Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Williams – 63
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 18 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 19.
2440
(The House divided on Motion No. 19, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Bennett
| Benoit
| Blaikie
| Bonwick
|
Borotsik
| Bulte
| Cadman
| Casey
|
Cauchon
| Clouthier
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
|
Cotler
| Desjarlais
| Earle
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Folco
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
|
Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
|
Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Jackson
|
Johnston
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McWhinney
|
Mifflin
| Myers
| O'Reilly
| Parrish
|
Peric
| Pratt
| Proulx
| Redman
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Sekora
| Shepherd
|
Steckle
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Telegdi
|
Ur
| Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
|
Wilfert
| Williams – 66
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 19 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 21.
2445
(The House divided on Motion No. 21, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
|
Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Benoit
|
Blaikie
| Borotsik
| Bryden
| Cadman
|
Calder
| Casey
| Cauchon
| Chan
|
Coderre
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Cullen
|
Desjarlais
| DeVillers
| Dion
| Dromisky
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
|
Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
| Karygiannis
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Mitchell
|
Nault
| Normand
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Saada
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Williams – 57
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 21 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 22. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2450
(The House divided on Motion No. 22, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Bennett
| Benoit
| Blaikie
| Bonwick
|
Borotsik
| Bulte
| Cadman
| Casey
|
Cauchon
| Clouthier
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
|
Cotler
| Earle
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Folco
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
|
Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Jackson
| Johnston
|
Jones
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Longfield
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Malhi
| Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McWhinney
| Mifflin
|
Myers
| Parrish
| Pratt
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Sekora
| Shepherd
| Steckle
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Ur
| Valeri
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Wilfert
| Williams – 64
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 22 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 23. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2455
(The House divided on Motion No. 23, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Bakopanos
|
Beaumier
| Benoit
| Blaikie
| Borotsik
|
Cadman
| Calder
| Casey
| Cauchon
|
Chan
| Coderre
| Collenette
| Cullen
|
DeVillers
| Dion
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
|
Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Johnston
| Jones
| Karygiannis
| Laliberte
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
|
Mitchell
| Nault
| Normand
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Saada
| Speller
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
|
Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Williams – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 23 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 24. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2500
(The House divided on Motion No. 24, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bennett
| Benoit
|
Blaikie
| Bonwick
| Bulte
| Cadman
|
Casey
| Cauchon
| Clouthier
| Collenette
|
Cotler
| Earle
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Folco
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
|
Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Johnston
| Jones
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Longfield
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McWhinney
|
Mifflin
| Proulx
| Provenzano
| Redman
|
Sekora
| Shepherd
| Steckle
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
|
Williams – 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 24 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 26. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 26, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Benoit
|
Bevilacqua
| Blaikie
| Bonin
| Brown
|
Bryden
| Cadman
| Calder
| Cannis
|
Casey
| Cauchon
| Chan
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Cullen
| DeVillers
| Dion
|
Duhamel
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Fry
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Hanger
|
Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
|
Jones
| Keyes
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mifflin
| Mitchell
| Nault
|
Normand
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Saada
| St. Denis
|
St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Williams – 57
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 26 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 27.
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
2505
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 27, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
|
Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Bennett
| Benoit
| Blaikie
| Bonwick
|
Borotsik
| Cadman
| Casey
| Cauchon
|
Clouthier
| Collenette
| Cotler
| Earle
|
Easter
| Folco
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
|
Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
|
Jones
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Longfield
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Malhi
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McWhinney
| Mifflin
| Peric
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Shepherd
|
Steckle
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Williams
– 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 27 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 28. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2510
(The House divided on Motion No. 28, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
|
Bakopanos
| Bélair
| Benoit
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Brown
| Bryden
|
Cadman
| Calder
| Cannis
| Casey
|
Cauchon
| Chan
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Cullen
| DeVillers
| Dion
| Dromisky
|
Earle
| Fry
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
|
Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Johnston
| Jones
| Keyes
| Laliberte
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mifflin
| Mitchell
| Normand
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| St. Denis
|
St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Williams – 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 28 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 29. Is it the pleasure for
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2515
(The House divided on Motion No. 29, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
|
Bélair
| Bélanger
| Bennett
| Benoit
|
Blaikie
| Bonwick
| Borotsik
| Cadman
|
Casey
| Cauchon
| Chan
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Cotler
| Earle
| Easter
|
Folco
| Fry
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
|
Hanger
| Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
|
Jones
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Malhi
| Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McWhinney
| Mifflin
| Myers
| Normand
|
Peric
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Shepherd
|
St - Julien
| Steckle
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Ur
| Valeri
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan
| Williams – 62
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 29 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 30.
[Translation]
Mr. Réal Ménard: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. We
are going through difficult times, but I think we must take the
time to do things the right way. I am sure all my colleagues
from all sides of the House will want to join me and thank our
pages who are working here tonight. I will name them—
The Deputy Speaker: Order, please.
[English]
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
2520
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 30, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Baker
| Bélair
| Bélanger
| Benoit
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Bryden
| Cadman
|
Calder
| Cannis
| Casey
| Cauchon
|
Chan
| Coderre
| Collenette
| Cotler
|
Cullen
| Dion
| Earle
| Easter
|
Fry
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Harvard
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
| Jones
| Keyes
|
Laliberte
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
|
Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
Mifflin
| Normand
| Proulx
| Saada
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Shepherd
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
|
Stoffer
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Williams – 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 30 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 32.
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
2525
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 32, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
– 25
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Augustine
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Bennett
| Benoit
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Bonwick
| Borotsik
| Bryden
| Cadman
|
Calder
| Cannis
| Casey
| Cauchon
|
Clouthier
| Cotler
| Easter
| Folco
|
Goodale
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
| Jones
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Malhi
| Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| Mifflin
| Myers
|
Peric
| Pratt
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Shepherd
|
St. Denis
| Steckle
| Stoffer
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Wilfert
|
Williams – 57
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 32 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 33.
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
2530
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed to the motion will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 33, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Augustine
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bélanger
| Benoit
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Borotsik
| Cadman
| Cauchon
| Coderre
|
Cotler
| Dion
| Duhamel
| Easter
|
Fry
| Goodale
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
|
Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
|
Jones
| Keyes
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
| Maloney
|
Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mifflin
|
Nault
| Normand
| Peric
| Proulx
|
Reed
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| St. Denis
|
Stoffer
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Williams – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 33 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 34. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed to the motion will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2535
(The House divided on Motion No. 34, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
– 25
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bélair
|
Bélanger
| Bennett
| Benoit
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Bonwick
| Borotsik
| Cadman
|
Calder
| Cauchon
| Clouthier
| Cotler
|
Goodale
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Hanger
|
Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
|
Jones
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Mifflin
| Myers
| Peric
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Reed
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Sekora
| Shepherd
| St. Denis
| Steckle
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Ur
| Valeri
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Wilfert
| Williams – 56
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 34 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Réal Ménard: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I
would like to ask how many votes are left before the end of the
proceedings. Could you tell us for the benefit of all members?
The Deputy Speaker: I am sorry, I have no idea because some
motions could go without a recorded division. However, the
Speaker remains at the service of the House.
2540
[English]
The next question is on Motion No. 35. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2545
(The House divided on Motion No. 35, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
|
Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bélanger
| Bennett
|
Benoit
| Blaikie
| Bonin
| Bonwick
|
Borotsik
| Bulte
| Cadman
| Calder
|
Cauchon
| Coderre
| Cullen
| Dion
|
Duhamel
| Finlay
| Goodale
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Gruending
| Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
| Jones
| Keyes
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Normand
| Redman
|
Reed
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Shepherd
| St. Denis
| Steckle
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Ur
| Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan
| Williams – 58
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 35 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Réal Ménard: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I ask
for the unanimous consent of the House to welcome the hon.
member for Edmonton North in her new role as leader of the
opposition.
[English]
The Deputy Speaker: The next question is on Motion No. 36.
2550
(The House divided on Motion No. 36, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
|
Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Baker
| Beaumier
| Bennett
| Benoit
|
Blaikie
| Bonin
| Bonwick
| Borotsik
|
Bryden
| Cadman
| Calder
| Cauchon
|
Clouthier
| Coderre
| Cotler
| Cullen
|
Dion
| Dromisky
| Folco
| Goodale
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Hanger
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
| Jones
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
|
Myers
| Provenzano
| Redman
| Saada
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Shepherd
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| Steckle
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Ur
| Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
|
Williams – 61
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 36 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Michel Bellehumeur (Berthier—Montcalm, BQ): Mr. Speaker, on a
point of order. I think it would be a good idea for you to
enlighten the House at this time. I have heard a number of
Liberal members wondering whether one of our colleagues wearing
a turtle neck is entitled to vote.
I tell them he is entitled to vote, but they stubbornly insist—
The Deputy Speaker: All members in the House are always entitled
to vote. I have heard no mention of this. We will therefore
continue with the votes.
Mr. Michel Bellehumeur: Mr. Speaker, in order to enlighten this
House I raise a point of order. I ask you whether a colleague in
this House wearing a turtle neck is entitled to vote.
The Deputy Speaker: I am well aware that it is late, but if I
remember what the Speaker said the last time we discussed this
matter, we decided that a tie is not required for a member to
vote in the House.
I think this is how we decided. It is fairly late and perhaps a
little too late to look at all the precedents on this. Perhaps
tomorrow we can no doubt look at this.
I cannot recognize the member for
Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Pabok for the moment.
2555
[English]
The next question is on Motion No. 37.
2600
(The House divided on Motion No. 37, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Baker
| Bélanger
| Benoit
| Blaikie
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Bonwick
| Bryden
|
Bulte
| Cadman
| Cauchon
| Clouthier
|
Coderre
| Cullen
| Dion
| Dromisky
|
Easter
| Goodale
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
|
Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Johnston
| Jones
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
|
Laliberte
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
|
Myers
| Redman
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Sekora
| Shepherd
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
St - Julien
| Steckle
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Williams – 56
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 37 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 38.
2605
(The House divided on Motion No. 38, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Assadourian
| Augustine
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Bélanger
| Benoit
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
|
Bonwick
| Bryden
| Bulte
| Cadman
|
Cauchon
| Clouthier
| Coderre
| Cotler
|
Dion
| Dromisky
| Easter
| Goodale
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Hanger
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
| Jones
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Maloney
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Redman
| Saada
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Shepherd
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Steckle
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
|
Williams – 57
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 38 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 39.
2610
(The House divided on Motion No. 39, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
|
Bélanger
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Bonwick
| Bryden
| Cadman
|
Cauchon
| Clouthier
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Dion
| Dromisky
| Finlay
| Goodale
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Hanger
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
| Jones
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Maloney
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McWhinney
|
Mifflin
| Sekora
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
St - Julien
| Steckle
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Ur
| Whelan
| Wilfert
| Williams
– 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 39 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 40.
2615
(The House divided on Motion No. 40, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Baker
| Bélanger
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Cadman
| Cauchon
|
Clouthier
| Coderre
| Collenette
| Dion
|
Dromisky
| Easter
| Finlay
| Goodale
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
| Jordan
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Malhi
| Maloney
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McWhinney
| Mifflin
| O'Reilly
|
Provenzano
| Sekora
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
St - Julien
| Steckle
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Ur
| Valeri
| Whelan
| Wilfert
|
Williams – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 40 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 41.
2620
(The House divided on Motion No. 41, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Augustine
| Baker
|
Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Cadman
| Cauchon
| Clouthier
|
Coderre
| Collenette
| Dion
| Dromisky
|
Easter
| Finlay
| Goodale
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
|
Jordan
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Malhi
| Maloney
| Mancini
| McCormick
|
Mifflin
| O'Reilly
| Peric
| Phinney
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Steckle
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Valeri
| Whelan
| Williams – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 41 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 42.
2625
(The House divided on Motion No. 42, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Bergeron
| Lalonde
| Loubier – 3
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Baker
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Cauchon
| Coderre
| Collenette
| Dion
|
Goodale
| Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
|
Johnston
| Keyes
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mancini
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
|
Williams – 21
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 42 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Michel Bellehumeur: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.
If you had been a bit more quick to act and had given me the
time to vote, I would have supported this amendment.
The Deputy Speaker: Undoubtedly.
Mr. Richard Marceau: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.
If you had been, as usual, kind enough to give me the time to
vote, I would have voted like the whip of the Bloc Quebecois.
I ask that my vote be recorded in favour of the amendment.
Mr. Réal Ménard: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I want
to be recorded as having voted the same way as the whip did. I
think your decision makes you unworthy of sitting in the chair.
Mr. Paul Crête: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. With
your hasty decision, you prevented me from voting and I believe
I should have had the right to vote on this motion. I ask that
my vote be recorded in favour of the motion.
Mr. Gérard Asselin: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. As
you know, members vote from the front to the back rows. At one
point, you asked what members were against the amendment. We
were penalized and we ask that our vote be recorded.
The Deputy Speaker: Order, please. The Speaker rose and when he
does, honourable members have to sit down.
[English]
It is obvious that some members wished to vote on the last vote
but did not rise when the vote was taking place. There is some
obligation on members to move when the clerk at the table is
calling the vote.
[Translation]
The Speaker has an obligation before the House to continue with
the work of the House. If members want to vote, I can solve this
problem immediately.
Is there unanimous consent for the members of the Bloc Quebecois
who did not vote on the last question to be recorded as having
voted like on the previous question?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
2630
The Deputy Speaker: We can resolve this problem, unless there is
not unanimous consent to apply the vote. We have no option now
but to continue to vote. Is there unanimous consent?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
The Deputy Speaker: Order, please. I will not hear any more
points of order.
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau: Mr. Speaker, if you will allow me, and
since you prevented me from voting earlier, I would like my vote
recorded with that of the Bloc Quebecois and would like to ask
you where in the Montpetit-Marleau the time limit for voting is
defined? Do you decide on the time limit? That is my question.
The Deputy Speaker: I decided and that is the end of the
discussion. We can continue.
[English]
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
The Deputy Speaker: The next question is on Motion No. 43.
2635
(The House divided on Motion No. 43, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Baker
| Bélair
| Bélanger
| Benoit
|
Bertrand
| Blaikie
| Brison
| Bryden
|
Cadman
| Calder
| Cauchon
| Chan
|
Coderre
| Collenette
| Cullen
| Dion
|
Dromisky
| Easter
| Finlay
| Goodale
|
Gruending
| Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
| Keyes
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Longfield
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Torsney
|
Wasylycia - Leis
– 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 43 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron: Mr. Speaker, on a point of order. I must
tell you that something of some concern happened a few minutes
ago. Simply because a colleague took too long, in your opinion,
to rise, you deprived the members in the subsequent rows, that
is, the second, third, fourth and fifth rows, of their right to
vote.
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron: How can you assume, simply because a
colleague delayed too long to vote, in your opinion, and
knowingly—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron: Mr. Speaker, could you tell our
colleagues opposite to stop bellowing for a few minutes, so I
can finish making my point?
How, simply because a colleague—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
The Deputy Speaker: Order, please. I want to hear the point of
order of the hon. whip of the Bloc Quebecois and I hope we may
all hear him.
2640
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron: Mr. Speaker, once again, how could you,
simply because in your view a colleague took too long to vote,
decide out of hand that no other colleague in this House could
vote for or against a motion? On the basis of what precedent,
what jurisprudence or what Standing Order do you decide you can
deprive members of their right to vote simply because one member
apparently took too long to vote, in your opinion?
The Deputy Speaker: I know that the hon. member has read the
new book on procedure. The Chair has a duty to the House to
continue proceedings. No one rose at that point to support the
motion. There were two votes in favour, and no one—neither the
hon. member for Berthier—Montcalm nor any other member of the
House—rose.
I thought that everyone who wanted to vote for the motion had
already done so and so I called for those who wished to vote
against it. I obviously made a decision that was not exactly
shared by the other members. That is too bad, but the decision
has been made, and we can continue to vote. Clearly, if members
wish to vote, they must rise. This is always the rule in the
House. We can now continue, because I believe I have answered
the question of the hon. whip of the Bloc Quebecois.
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron: Mr. Speaker, according to the procedure
generally recognized in this House, so long as the members in the
first row have not finished voting, the members in the second row
do not begin voting.
How do you expect my colleague from Joliette to rise in support
of the motion when our colleague from Berthier—Montcalm had not
yet risen? There has been a sort of procedural error, and I
would like you to tell me exactly—for the gallery, you referred
to Montpetit-Marleau—what allows you to do what you did a few
minutes ago?
The Deputy Speaker: As I have already indicated, I gave my
reasons. Members are required to rise quickly in a vote. This
is perfectly reasonable in a vote, and it is in keeping with
House precedents in this regard. I will find a quote later to
answer the request by the hon. member, but I repeat once again
what I said.
[English]
The Speaker has an obligation to continue with the work of the
House. If members in one row or another choose not to vote, it
is not for the Chair to look to the next row. Members must rise
if they wish to vote and that is what I have decided.
The next question is on Motion No. 44.
2645
(The House divided on Motion No. 44, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
|
Beaumier
| Bélair
| Benoit
| Bertrand
|
Blaikie
| Bonin
| Brison
| Bryden
|
Cadman
| Calder
| Chan
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Cullen
| Dion
| Easter
|
Finlay
| Fry
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
|
Hanger
| Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Johnston
| Keyes
| Laliberte
| Longfield
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mifflin
| Nault
|
Parrish
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Saada
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Speller
| St. Denis
| Stoffer
|
Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Williams
– 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 44 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron: Mr. Speaker, on a point of order. I call
on the co-operation we must have in this House to again ask for
unanimous consent so that the members of the Bloc Quebecois who
were present in the House during this vote may be recorded as
voting in support of this motion in amendment.
The Deputy Speaker: Is there unanimous consent?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
[English]
The Deputy Speaker: The next question is on Motion No. 48.
A vote on this motion also applies to Motion No. 49.
2650
(The House divided on Motion No. 48, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bennett
|
Benoit
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Brison
| Bryden
| Bulte
| Cadman
|
Calder
| Clouthier
| Collenette
| Cotler
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Hanger
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
| Jordan
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Myers
| Phinney
|
Proulx
| Redman
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Sekora
| Shepherd
| Speller
| Steckle
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Williams – 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 48 lost. I
therefore declare Motion No. 49 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 50.
2655
(The House divided on Motion No. 50, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
|
Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bélanger
| Bennett
|
Benoit
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Brison
| Bryden
| Bulte
| Cadman
|
Calder
| Chan
| Clouthier
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Cotler
| Dion
| Easter
|
Fry
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Hanger
|
Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Johnston
|
Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Longfield
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
| Maloney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McCormick
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Myers
| Nault
|
O'Reilly
| Parrish
| Peric
| Phinney
|
Proud
| Proulx
| Provenzano
| Redman
|
Reed
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Shepherd
| Speller
| Steckle
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Telegdi
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Wilfert
|
Williams – 77
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No.
50 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 51. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2700
[Translation]
Mr. Ghislain Fournier (Manicouagan, BQ): Mr. Speaker, I rise on
a point of order. I would like to know if you did register my
vote when I rose previously.
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): The answer is yes.
(The House divided on Motion No. 51, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Baker
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bonin
| Brison
| Bryden
| Cauchon
|
Chan
| Coderre
| Collenette
| Dion
|
Dromisky
| Easter
| Eggleton
| Fry
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Hardy
| Harvard
|
Johnston
| Keyes
| Laliberte
| Longfield
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
|
Nault
| Parrish
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Proud
| Saada
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
Stoffer
| Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis – 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No.
51 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 52. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2705
(The House divided on Motion No. 52, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Baker
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Bonwick
| Brison
| Bryden
| Bulte
|
Cauchon
| Chan
| Clouthier
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Cotler
| Cullen
| Dion
|
Dromisky
| Duncan
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Fry
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Hardy
|
Harris
| Harvard
| Hilstrom
| Johnston
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Lastewka
| Longfield
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McCormick
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
|
Myers
| Nault
| O'Reilly
| Parrish
|
Peric
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proud
|
Proulx
| Saada
| Sekora
| Shepherd
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| Steckle
| Stoffer
|
Strahl
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Wilfert
– 76
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No.
52 lost.
2710
The next question is on Motion No. 53. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2715
(The House divided on Motion No. 53, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Augustine
| Beaumier
| Bélair
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
| Bonwick
|
Brison
| Bryden
| Bulte
| Cauchon
|
Collenette
| Cotler
| Cullen
| Dromisky
|
Duncan
| Eggleton
| Gruending
| Hardy
|
Harris
| Harvard
| Hilstrom
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Laliberte
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
|
Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Myers
| Phinney
|
Proulx
| Provenzano
| Redman
| Saada
|
Sekora
| Shepherd
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
Steckle
| Stoffer
| Strahl
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Ur
| Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan
| Wilfert – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No.
53 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 54. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 54, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Anders
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Baker
| Bélair
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonwick
| Brison
|
Bulte
| Cauchon
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Dion
| Duncan
| Eggleton
| Fry
|
Gruending
| Hardy
| Harris
| Harvard
|
Hilstrom
| Karetak - Lindell
| Laliberte
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Mifflin
| Myers
| Nault
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Proud
| Provenzano
| Redman
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Sekora
| Shepherd
| Steckle
| Stoffer
|
Strahl
| Ur
| Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan
| Wilfert
– 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No.
54 lost.
2720
The next question is on Motion No. 55. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed to
the motion will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 55, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Anders
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bélanger
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Blaikie
| Bonin
| Brison
| Bryden
|
Cauchon
| Collenette
| Cotler
| Cullen
|
Dromisky
| Duncan
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Gruending
| Hardy
| Harris
| Harvard
|
Hilstrom
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| O'Reilly
|
Parrish
| Phinney
| Provenzano
| Redman
|
Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| St. Denis
|
Stoffer
| Strahl
| Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No.
55 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 56. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2725
(The House divided on Motion No. 56, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Anders
| Augustine
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Beaumier
| Bélair
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bryden
|
Cauchon
| Coderre
| Collenette
| Cullen
|
Dion
| Dromisky
| Duncan
| Eggleton
|
Fry
| Gruending
| Hardy
| Harris
|
Harvard
| Hilstrom
| Laliberte
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Nault
|
Phinney
| Proud
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Strahl
|
Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis
– 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No.
56 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 57. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2730
(The House divided on Motion No. 57, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Anders
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Blaikie
| Brison
| Bryden
| Bulte
|
Cauchon
| Clouthier
| Collenette
| Cullen
|
Dromisky
| Duncan
| Eggleton
| Gruending
|
Hardy
| Harris
| Harvard
| Hilstrom
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McDonough
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| Mifflin
| Myers
|
Phinney
| Provenzano
| Redman
| Saada
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Shepherd
| St. Denis
|
Stoffer
| Strahl
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Whelan
– 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 57 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Réal Ménard (Hochelaga—Maisonneuve, BQ): Mr. Speaker, I rise
on a point of order. Could you see if there is unanimous consent
to thank the pages who are working with us throughout the night?
I wish to thank Adam, Laura, Annie, Marc, Deborah, Annie,
Christie, Julien, Jennifer, and Meg.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): Is there unanimous consent?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
[English]
The next question is on Motion No. 58. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
2735
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 58, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Fournier
|
Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Alcock
| Anders
|
Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Beaumier
|
Bélair
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Brison
|
Cauchon
| Coderre
| Collenette
| Cullen
|
Dion
| Dromisky
| Duncan
| Eggleton
|
Fry
| Gruending
| Harb
| Hardy
|
Harris
| Harvard
| Hilstrom
| Keyes
|
Laliberte
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| Mifflin
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Nault
| Phinney
| Proud
|
Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
|
Stoffer
| Strahl
| Torsney
– 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 58 lost.
2740
The next question is on Motion No. 59. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2745
(The House divided on Motion No. 59, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Alcock
| Anders
| Augustine
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Beaumier
| Bélanger
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Blaikie
| Brison
| Cauchon
| Collenette
|
Cullen
| Dromisky
| Duncan
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
|
Harb
| Hardy
| Harris
| Harvard
|
Hilstrom
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Longfield
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
| Maloney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| McCormick
| McDonough
| Mifflin
|
Parrish
| Peric
| Phinney
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Redman
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Shepherd
| St. Denis
| Steckle
| Stoffer
|
Strahl
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Whelan – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 59 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 60. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2750
(The House divided on Motion No. 60, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Alcock
| Anders
| Augustine
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Beaumier
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Blaikie
| Bonin
| Brison
| Bryden
|
Bulte
| Cauchon
| Clouthier
| Collenette
|
Cullen
| Dromisky
| Duncan
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
|
Harb
| Hardy
| Harris
| Harvard
|
Hilstrom
| Jackson
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Longfield
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
|
Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McCormick
| McDonough
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| Mifflin
|
Myers
| Parrish
| Peric
| Phinney
|
Proulx
| Redman
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Shepherd
| St. Denis
| Steckle
| Stoffer
|
Strahl
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Wilfert
– 64
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 60 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 61.
2755
(The House divided on Motion No. 61, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Alcock
| Anders
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Blaikie
| Brison
| Bulte
| Cauchon
|
Clouthier
| Coderre
| Collenette
| Dion
|
Duncan
| Easter
| Eggleton
| Finlay
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
| Harb
| Hardy
|
Harris
| Harvard
| Hilstrom
| Jackson
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
Mifflin
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Nault
| Parrish
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proud
| Redman
| Sekora
|
Shepherd
| Steckle
| Stoffer
| Strahl
|
Szabo
| Ur
| Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan
| Wilfert – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 61 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 62.
2800
(The House divided on Motion No. 62, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Alcock
| Anders
|
Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Barnes
|
Beaumier
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Brison
| Bulte
| Cauchon
|
Coderre
| Cotler
| Cullen
| Dion
|
Dromisky
| Duncan
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
| Harb
|
Hardy
| Harris
| Harvard
| Hilstrom
|
Jackson
| Keyes
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
| Maloney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
|
O'Reilly
| Peric
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proud
|
Proulx
| Sgro
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stoffer
| Strahl
| Torsney
|
Wasylycia - Leis – 57
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 62 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 63. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed to
the motion will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2805
(The House divided on Motion No. 63, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Alcock
| Anders
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Bélanger
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonwick
| Bradshaw
|
Brison
| Cauchon
| Coderre
| Cotler
|
Dion
| Duncan
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
| Harb
|
Hardy
| Harris
| Harvard
| Hilstrom
|
Jackson
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Lowther
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McCormick
| McDonough
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
| Myers
|
O'Reilly
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proud
| Proulx
|
Redman
| Sekora
| Sgro
| St - Julien
|
Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stoffer
| Strahl
|
Szabo
| Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
|
Wilfert – 61
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 63 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 64. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2810
(The House divided on Motion No. 64, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Anders
| Assad
| Augustine
|
Barnes
| Beaumier
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
|
Blaikie
| Bonin
| Bonwick
| Brison
|
Cauchon
| Collenette
| Cotler
| Cullen
|
Dromisky
| Duncan
| Eggleton
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Gruending
| Harb
| Hardy
|
Harris
| Harvard
| Hilstrom
| Laliberte
|
Lowther
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
|
Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McDonough
| Paradis
| Patry
| Phinney
|
Proulx
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sgro
|
Shepherd
| St. Denis
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stoffer
| Strahl
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Ur
| Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan – 56
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 64 lost.
Before we go to the next motion I want to ask for the
co-operation of members. When the vote is being called, I wonder
if members would please not jump up and down and exchange seats.
It makes it almost impossible for the vote callers.
In addition, members should not wander in and out when the vote
is being called on this side or the other side, and let us not
hold up any signs. This is still the House of Commons. It may
be early in the morning, but we will still conduct ourselves as
we should.
The next question is on Motion No. 65.
2815
(The House divided on Motion No. 65, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Anders
| Assad
|
Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Barnes
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bradshaw
| Brison
| Cauchon
| Chan
|
Coderre
| Collenette
| Cotler
| Cullen
|
Dion
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Duncan
|
Eggleton
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
|
Gruending
| Harb
| Hardy
| Harris
|
Harvard
| Hilstrom
| Keyes
| Laliberte
|
Lowther
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
| Nault
| Peterson
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proud
| Proulx
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Sgro
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stoffer
|
Strahl
| Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
– 60
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 65 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 66.
[Translation]
Mr. Jean-Paul Marchand: Mr. Speaker, something very disturbing
and spine-chilling is happening in this House and makes me
believe that maybe—
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): What is the point of
order, please?
[Translation]
Mr. Jean-Paul Marchand: In fact, there is something very
disturbing and spine-chilling that is happening in this House and
that makes me believe that we may possibly—
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): If the member for
Québec East has a point of order, would he make it right now
please.
[Translation]
Mr. Jean-Paul Marchand: There is something going on in this place
which concerns me deeply and which—
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): Is it the pleasure
of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed to
the motion will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2820
(The House divided on Motion No. 66, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Blaikie
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
| Hardy
|
Laliberte
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
|
Stoffer
| Wasylycia - Leis – 10
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Anders
| Assad
| Asselin
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Brison
| Cauchon
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Collenette
|
Eggleton
| Goodale
| Harb
| Harris
|
Harvard
| Hilstrom
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Loubier
| Lowther
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Manley
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Strahl
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 30
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 66 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 67. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2825
(The House divided on Motion No. 67, which was agreed to on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Assad
| Augustine
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Barnes
| Beaumier
|
Bélanger
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
|
Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Bonwick
|
Bradshaw
| Brison
| Bulte
| Calder
|
Cauchon
| Chan
| Clouthier
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Cotler
| Cullen
| DeVillers
|
Dion
| Drouin
| Duhamel
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Finlay
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Gruending
| Harb
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Hubbard
| Iftody
| Jackson
|
Jones
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Longfield
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Malhi
| Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McCormick
| McDonough
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
| Myers
|
Nault
| O'Reilly
| Paradis
| Parrish
|
Patry
| Peric
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Pratt
| Proud
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Redman
| Reed
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Sekora
| Sgro
| Shepherd
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Telegdi
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
|
Wilfert – 101
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Anders
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
|
Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
|
Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Duncan
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Harris
| Hilstrom
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Lowther
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Strahl
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 35
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 67 agreed to.
The next question is on Motion No. 68.
2830
(The House divided on Motion No. 68, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Alcock
| Anders
| Assad
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bélanger
| Bennett
| Blaikie
|
Brison
| Bulte
| Cauchon
| Clouthier
|
Collenette
| Cotler
| Drouin
| Duncan
|
Easter
| Eggleton
| Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Gruending
| Harb
| Hardy
|
Harris
| Harvard
| Hilstrom
| Hubbard
|
Jackson
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Laliberte
|
Lastewka
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
Lowther
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mahoney
|
Malhi
| Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McCormick
| McDonough
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Myers
| O'Reilly
| Parrish
| Patry
|
Peric
| Pratt
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Redman
| Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Sgro
| Shepherd
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stoffer
| Strahl
| Telegdi
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
|
Wilfert – 73
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 68 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 69.
2835
(The House divided on Motion No. 69, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Anders
| Assad
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bradshaw
| Brison
| Cauchon
| Chan
|
Coderre
| Collenette
| Dion
| Duhamel
|
Duncan
| Eggleton
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Gruending
| Harb
| Hardy
|
Harris
| Harvard
| Hilstrom
| Laliberte
|
Lowther
| MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
| Nault
| Peterson
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proud
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stoffer
| Strahl
| Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 69 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 70. A vote on this motion
also applies to Motion No. 71. Is it the pleasure of the House
to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2840
(The House divided on Motion No. 70, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Anders
| Assad
| Augustine
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Barnes
| Beaumier
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Brison
| Bryden
| Cauchon
|
Collenette
| DeVillers
| Dromisky
| Duncan
|
Eggleton
| Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
|
Gruending
| Harb
| Hardy
| Harvard
|
Hilstrom
| Iftody
| Laliberte
| Lowther
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Manley
|
McCormick
| McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| O'Reilly
|
Paradis
| Patry
| Peric
| Phinney
|
Redman
| Reed
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Strahl
|
Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 70 lost.
I therefore declare Motion No. 71 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 72.
2845
(The House divided on Motion No. 72, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Anders
| Assad
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bélanger
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Brison
|
Cauchon
| Collenette
| Cotler
| Duncan
|
Easter
| Eggleton
| Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Gruending
| Harb
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Hilstrom
| Hubbard
| Jackson
|
Laliberte
| Lincoln
| Longfield
| Lowther
|
MacAulay
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
| Manley
|
McCormick
| McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| O'Reilly
|
Parrish
| Patry
| Peric
| Proulx
|
Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sgro
| Shepherd
|
Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stoffer
| Strahl
|
Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 72 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Réal Ménard: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. With
your permission, considering that this is a historical moment, I
would like, on behalf of my colleagues of the Bloc Quebecois, to
tell Quebecers who are watching that, as long as we will sit in
this Parliament, they can always rely on us to defend the
interests of Quebec.
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): The next question is
on Motion No. 73. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the
motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed to
the motion will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2850
(The House divided on Motion No. 73, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Anders
| Bélanger
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Brison
| Bulte
|
Clouthier
| Collenette
| Cotler
| Drouin
|
Duncan
| Easter
| Eggleton
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Gruending
| Harb
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Hilstrom
| Hubbard
| Jackson
|
Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Laliberte
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Longfield
| Lowther
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mahoney
| Malhi
| Mancini
|
Manley
| McCormick
| McDonough
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Myers
| O'Reilly
| Parrish
|
Patry
| Pratt
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Redman
| Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Sgro
| Shepherd
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stoffer
| Strahl
| Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan
| Wilfert – 62
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 73 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Paul Crête: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. Since
73 votes have been registered and there are close to 400 votes
left, I would like to know what will happen to the committees
that would normally be sitting today, including the Standing
Committee on Human Resources Development where the internal
auditor is scheduled to appear to shed light on—
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): This is not a point of
order.
[English]
Committees are creatures of their own. I do not have any idea
what is going to happen with the committee.
2855
[Translation]
Mr. Paul Crête: Mr. Speaker, will you please allow me to speak
and be heard by the members of the House?
You have—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): No, I will not. I
recognized the member for
Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup—Témiscouata—Les Basques on a point
of order. The point of order would have to have something to do
with what is going on in the House right now, for example the
order of the vote. If your point of order is pertinent to what
is happening right now I will listen to it, but there is no other
reason.
[Translation]
Mr. Paul Crête: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order
specifically in reference to the vote, because I want my right
to vote as a parliamentarian to be respected. I am indicating
that certain committees are scheduled to sit today and my right
to vote in this place might be affected if committees are
sitting at the same time.
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I would suggest the
hon. member for Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup—Témiscouata—Les
Basques consult with his caucus. We will do the question first
and I will check that later.
The next question is on Motion No. 74. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2900
(The House divided on Motion No. 74, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Blaikie
| Duncan
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Gruending
| Hardy
| Hilstrom
| Laliberte
|
Lowther
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| Stoffer
|
Strahl
| Wasylycia - Leis – 14
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assad
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bigras
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bradshaw
|
Brien
| Brison
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Cauchon
| Collenette
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dion
| Dumas
| Eggleton
|
Fournier
| Goodale
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Harb
| Harvard
| Keyes
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Manley
| Marchand
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Ménard
| Mitchell
| Peterson
| Sauvageau
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| St - Hilaire
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 74 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 75. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed to
the motion will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2905
(The House divided on Motion No. 75, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Assad
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Barnes
| Beaumier
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
|
Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Brison
|
Bryden
| Cauchon
| Collenette
| Cullen
|
DeVillers
| Dromisky
| Duncan
| Eggleton
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Gruending
| Harb
|
Hardy
| Harvard
| Hilstrom
| Iftody
|
Keyes
| Laliberte
| Lowther
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mitchell
|
Paradis
| Peterson
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stoffer
|
Strahl
| Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 75 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 76. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2910
(The House divided on Motion No. 76, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Blaikie
| Duncan
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
|
Hilstrom
| Lowther
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McDonough
| Stoffer
| Strahl
| Wasylycia - Leis – 12
|
NAYS
Members
Assad
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
|
Bellehumeur
| Bennett
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Brison
|
Bulte
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Cauchon
|
Collenette
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Drouin
| Dumas
| Eggleton
| Fournier
|
Goodale
| Guay
| Guimond
| Harb
|
Harvard
| Karetak - Lindell
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Limoges
| Loubier
| MacAulay
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Manley
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Ménard
| Myers
|
Pratt
| Redman
| Sauvageau
| Sekora
|
Shepherd
| St - Hilaire
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Szabo
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Ur
| Valeri
|
Whelan
| Wilfert – 58
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 76 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 77. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed to
the motion will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2915
(The House divided on Motion No. 77, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Assad
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Brison
| Bryden
| Cauchon
| Collenette
|
Cullen
| Duncan
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Harb
|
Harvard
| Hilstrom
| Hubbard
| Iftody
|
Jackson
| Laliberte
| Longfield
| Lowther
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| Paradis
| Patry
|
Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stoffer
| Telegdi
| Torsney
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No.
77 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 78.
2920
(The House divided on Motion No. 78, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Assad
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bélanger
|
Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Brison
|
Bulte
| Cauchon
| Collenette
| Cotler
|
Drouin
| Duncan
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Gruending
|
Harb
| Harvard
| Hubbard
| Jackson
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Laliberte
| Limoges
| Lincoln
|
Longfield
| Lowther
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McCormick
| McDonough
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| Myers
| Patry
| Peric
|
Proulx
| Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Sgro
| Shepherd
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Telegdi
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 55
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 78 lost.
I have noticed that there are quite a few members coming in and
out. I will remind everyone again that if a member is not
in the House when the question is put, that member is not to
vote. Did everybody understand that? For a member to vote the
member must be in the House when the question is put. If the
vote is obvious in one direction or another it is not a problem
but imagine if the vote was very close. The rule is that if
members are not in the House they cannot vote. Is that fair
enough? Do hon. members want me to explain that in more detail?
The question is on Motion No. 79. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2925
(The House divided on Motion No. 79, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Blaikie
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
| Laliberte
|
Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| Stoffer
|
Wasylycia - Leis – 9
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assad
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
|
Baker
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Bradshaw
| Brien
| Brison
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Cauchon
| Chan
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Coderre
| Collenette
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Dion
| Dumas
|
Eggleton
| Fournier
| Goodale
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Harb
| Harvard
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Manley
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mitchell
| Nault
| Peterson
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Sauvageau
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| St - Hilaire
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Vanclief – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 79 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 80. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed to
the motion will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
2930
(The House divided on Motion No. 80, which was agreed to on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Assad
| Augustine
|
Baker
| Barnes
| Beaumier
| Bélanger
|
Bennett
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
| Bradshaw
|
Brison
| Bryden
| Bulte
| Cauchon
|
Chan
| Clouthier
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Cotler
| DeVillers
| Dion
| Dromisky
|
Drouin
| Eggleton
| Finlay
| Fry
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Gruending
| Hubbard
|
Iftody
| Jackson
| Jordan
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
|
Laliberte
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| Mitchell
|
Myers
| Nault
| Paradis
| Patry
|
Peric
| Peterson
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proulx
|
Redman
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Sgro
| Shepherd
| St. Denis
| Steckle
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Telegdi
|
Torsney
| Ur
| Valeri
| Vanclief
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Wilfert
| Wood
– 76
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Dumas
| Duncan
|
Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Lowther
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Strahl
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 32
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 80 agreed to.
The next question is on Motion No. 81.
2935
(The House divided on Motion No. 81, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Anders
| Assad
|
Augustine
| Baker
| Bonin
| Boudria
|
Bradshaw
| Brison
| Cauchon
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| DeVillers
| Dion
| Dromisky
|
Duhamel
| Duncan
| Eggleton
| Gagliano
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Gruending
| Harris
|
Hilstrom
| Iftody
| Laliberte
| Lowther
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
|
Nault
| Paradis
| Peterson
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stoffer
| Strahl
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
|
Wood – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 81 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 82.
2940
(The House divided on Motion No. 82, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Abbott
| Anders
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
|
Harris
| Hilstrom
| Laliberte
| Lowther
|
Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| Stoffer
|
Strahl
| Wasylycia - Leis – 14
|
NAYS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bélanger
| Bellehumeur
|
Bennett
| Bergeron
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Brison
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Cauchon
|
Collenette
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Dumas
|
Easter
| Eggleton
| Finlay
| Fournier
|
Goodale
| Guimond
| Hubbard
| Jackson
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Loubier
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mahoney
|
Manley
| Marceau
| Marchand
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
Myers
| Patry
| Sauvageau
| Sekora
|
Sgro
| Shepherd
| St - Hilaire
| Steckle
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Szabo
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Ur
|
Whelan – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 82 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 83.
2945
(The House divided on Motion No. 83, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Abbott
| Anders
| Duncan
| Harris
|
Hilstrom
| Lowther
| Strahl – 7
|
NAYS
Members
Asselin
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
|
Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bigras
| Blaikie
| Bonin
| Brien
|
Brison
| Bryden
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Cauchon
| Collenette
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| DeVillers
| Dromisky
| Dumas
|
Eggleton
| Fournier
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
|
Gruending
| Guay
| Guimond
| Laliberte
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Maloney
| Mancini
| Manley
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| Ménard
|
Paradis
| Saada
| Sauvageau
| St. Denis
|
St - Hilaire
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stoffer
| Torsney
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 55
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 83 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 85.
2950
(The House divided on Motion No. 85, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Blaikie
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
| Laliberte
|
Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| Stoffer
|
Wasylycia - Leis – 9
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Anders
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bennett
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Brison
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Cauchon
|
Collenette
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Drouin
| Dumas
| Duncan
| Eggleton
|
Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
| Harris
|
Hilstrom
| Jordan
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Limoges
| Loubier
| Lowther
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mahoney
| Manley
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| Ménard
| Myers
|
Sauvageau
| Sekora
| Sgro
| Shepherd
|
St - Hilaire
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Strahl
|
Szabo
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Ur
| Valeri
|
Whelan
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 58
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 85 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 86.
2955
(The House divided on Motion No. 86, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Brison
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
|
Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 29
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Anders
| Bennett
| Blaikie
|
Cauchon
| Collenette
| Drouin
| Duncan
|
Easter
| Eggleton
| Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Gruending
| Guarnieri
| Harris
| Hilstrom
|
Hubbard
| Jackson
| Jordan
| Laliberte
|
Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lowther
| Mahoney
|
Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McCormick
|
McDonough
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| Murray
| Myers
|
Patry
| Peric
| Sekora
| Sgro
|
Shepherd
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stoffer
|
Strahl
| Szabo
| Telegdi
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 86 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 87. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed to the motion will please
say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
And more than five members having risen:
3000
(The House divided on Motion No. 87, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Blaikie
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
| Laliberte
|
Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| Stoffer
|
Wasylycia - Leis – 9
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Anders
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
|
Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Collenette
|
Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Duncan
|
Easter
| Eggleton
| Finlay
| Fournier
|
Guarnieri
| Guay
| Guimond
| Harris
|
Hilstrom
| Hubbard
| Jackson
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Lincoln
| Loubier
|
Lowther
| Manley
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Murray
| Peric
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Strahl
| Telegdi
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 87 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 88. A vote on this motion
also applies to Motion No. 89.
3005
(The House divided on Motion No. 88, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Abbott
| Duncan
| Harris
| Hilstrom
|
Lowther
| Strahl
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 7
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bigras
|
Blaikie
| Bradshaw
| Brien
| Brison
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Collenette
|
Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Duhamel
|
Eggleton
| Fournier
| Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Gruending
| Guarnieri
| Guay
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Manley
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McDonough
| Ménard
| Nault
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stoffer
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 88 lost. I therefore
declare Motion No. 89 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 90.
3010
(The House divided on Motion No. 90, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Abbott
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Brison
| Duncan
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
|
Harris
| Hilstrom
| Lowther
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| Stoffer
|
Strahl
| Wasylycia - Leis – 18
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Asselin
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
|
Bélanger
| Bellehumeur
| Bennett
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Bonin
| Brien
|
Bryden
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
|
Collenette
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dromisky
| Drouin
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Finlay
| Fournier
| Guarnieri
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Hubbard
| Jackson
| Jordan
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Loubier
| Mahoney
| Malhi
|
Maloney
| Manley
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
McCormick
| Ménard
| Murray
| Paradis
|
Patry
| Peric
| Proulx
| Sauvageau
|
Sekora
| Sgro
| Shepherd
| St. Denis
|
St - Hilaire
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Szabo
|
Telegdi
| Torsney
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Whelan
| Wood – 67
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 90 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 91.
3015
(The House divided on Motion No. 91, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
– 22
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Anders
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bélanger
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bradshaw
|
Brison
| Bryden
| Caplan
| Cullen
|
Dromisky
| Drouin
| Duncan
| Eggleton
|
Gagliano
| Gruending
| Guarnieri
| Harris
|
Hilstrom
| Hubbard
| Jackson
| Jordan
|
Laliberte
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lowther
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Manley
| McDonough
| Murray
|
Myers
| Nault
| Paradis
| Patry
|
Proulx
| Provenzano
| Sgro
| St. Denis
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Strahl
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Vanclief
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood
– 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 91 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 92. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3020
(The House divided on Motion No. 92, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Anders
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
|
Boudria
| Bradshaw
| Brison
| Bryden
|
Bulte
| Caplan
| Cotler
| Cullen
|
DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
| Dromisky
| Drouin
|
Duncan
| Eggleton
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Gruending
| Guarnieri
| Harris
| Hilstrom
|
Hubbard
| Jackson
| Jordan
| Laliberte
|
Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lowther
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
McCormick
| Minna
| Murray
| Myers
|
Paradis
| Patry
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Sgro
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Strahl
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Vanclief
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
|
Wood – 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 92 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 93. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
And more than five members having risen:
3025
(The House divided on Motion No. 93, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Anders
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
|
Boudria
| Bradshaw
| Brison
| Bryden
|
Caplan
| Cotler
| Cullen
| DeVillers
|
Dhaliwal
| Dromisky
| Duncan
| Eggleton
|
Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Gruending
| Hilstrom
|
Hubbard
| Jackson
| Jordan
| Laliberte
|
Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lowther
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| McCormick
| Minna
| Murray
|
Myers
| Paradis
| Patry
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Sgro
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Strahl
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Vanclief
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
|
Wood – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 93 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 94. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3030
(The House divided on Motion No. 94, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Anders
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
|
Boudria
| Bradshaw
| Bryden
| Caplan
|
Cotler
| Cullen
| DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
|
Dromisky
| Drouin
| Duncan
| Eggleton
|
Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Gruending
| Guarnieri
|
Hilstrom
| Hubbard
| Jackson
| Jordan
|
Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lowther
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| McCormick
| McDonough
| Minna
|
Murray
| Myers
| Paradis
| Patry
|
Price
| Provenzano
| Sgro
| St - Julien
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Strahl
| Szabo
| Vanclief
|
White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 94 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 95.
[Translation]
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.
I would like you to give me a bit of an explanation of what is
going on.
I have been observing the procedure in the past few votes and I
have the feeling that something strikes me as somewhat irregular
at first glance. You are asking which members are for and which
against, and then you are moving immediately on to the recorded
vote, without a decision from you as to whether the yeas or the
nays have it, and as to whether five members have risen to call
for a recorded vote.
The Speaker: I thank the hon. member. He is right, as far as
Motion No. 95 is concerned.
[English]
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3035
(The House divided on Motion No. 95, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Bellemare
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bertrand
| Boudria
| Bradshaw
| Brison
|
Bryden
| Caplan
| Cotler
| Cullen
|
DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
| Dromisky
| Drouin
|
Duncan
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Gruending
| Guarnieri
| Harris
| Hilstrom
|
Hubbard
| Jackson
| Knutson
| Laliberte
|
Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lowther
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mahoney
| McCormick
| McDonough
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Minna
| Murray
| Patry
|
Price
| Provenzano
| Sgro
| St - Julien
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Strahl
| Szabo
| Vanclief
|
White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood
– 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 95 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 96. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3040
(The House divided on Motion No. 96, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
|
Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Bellemare
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Boudria
|
Bradshaw
| Brison
| Caplan
| DeVillers
|
Dhaliwal
| Dromisky
| Drouin
| Gagliano
|
Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
| Guarnieri
|
Hubbard
| Jackson
| Knutson
| Laliberte
|
Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Mahoney
| McDonough
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Minna
|
Mitchell
| Murray
| Patry
| Peterson
|
Price
| Provenzano
| Sgro
| St - Julien
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Vanclief
| Wood – 39
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 96 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 97. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3045
(The House divided on Motion No. 97, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Bellemare
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Boudria
| Bradshaw
| Brison
| Bryden
|
Caplan
| DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
| Drouin
|
Duncan
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Gruending
| Guarnieri
| Harris
| Hilstrom
|
Hubbard
| Jackson
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Knutson
|
Laliberte
| Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
|
MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mahoney
| McDonough
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
|
Minna
| Mitchell
| Murray
| Paradis
|
Patry
| Peterson
| Pratt
| Price
|
Provenzano
| Sgro
| St - Julien
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Strahl
| Szabo
| Vanclief
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
|
Wood – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 97 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 98. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of
the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3050
(The House divided on Motion No. 98, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Herron
| Lalonde
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Ménard
| Price
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| St - Jacques
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 28
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Bellemare
| Bennett
| Boudria
|
Bradshaw
| Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
|
DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
| Discepola
| Drouin
|
Duncan
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Gruending
| Guarnieri
| Harris
| Hilstrom
|
Hubbard
| Jackson
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Knutson
|
Laliberte
| Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
|
Mahoney
| McCormick
| McDonough
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
|
Minna
| Mitchell
| Murray
| Paradis
|
Patry
| Peterson
| Pratt
| Sgro
|
St - Julien
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Strahl
| Szabo
|
Vanclief
| Wood – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 98 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 99. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3055
(The House divided on Motion No. 99, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
– 24
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Anders
| Bellemare
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Boudria
| Bradshaw
| Brison
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
| DeVillers
|
Dhaliwal
| Discepola
| Drouin
| Duncan
|
Fontana
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Gruending
| Guarnieri
| Harris
| Hilstrom
|
Hubbard
| Jackson
| Jennings
| Knutson
|
Laliberte
| Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
|
Lowther
| Lunn
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Mahoney
|
McDonough
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Minna
| Mitchell
|
Murray
| Patry
| Peterson
| Pratt
|
Price
| Provenzano
| Sgro
| St - Jacques
|
St - Julien
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Strahl
| Szabo
|
Vanclief
– 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 99 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 100. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five having risen:
3100
(The House divided on Motion No. 100, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Bellemare
| Bennett
| Boudria
|
Bradshaw
| Brison
| Bryden
| Caplan
|
DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
| Discepola
| Drouin
|
Duncan
| Fontana
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
| Guarnieri
| Harris
|
Herron
| Hilstrom
| Hubbard
| Jackson
|
Jennings
| Knutson
| Laliberte
| Leung
|
Limoges
| Lowther
| Lunn
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Mahoney
| Matthews
| McDonough
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
|
Minna
| Mitchell
| Murray
| Paradis
|
Patry
| Peterson
| Pratt
| Price
|
Rock
| Sgro
| St - Jacques
| St - Julien
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Strahl
| Szabo
|
Vanclief
| Wood – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 100 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 101. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3105
(The House divided on Motion No. 101, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Bellemare
| Bennett
| Bradshaw
|
Bryden
| Caplan
| DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
|
Discepola
| Drouin
| Duncan
| Fontana
|
Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Guarnieri
| Herron
|
Hilstrom
| Hubbard
| Jackson
| Jennings
|
Knutson
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Leung
|
Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lowther
| Lunn
|
Mahoney
| Matthews
| McCormick
| McDonough
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Minna
| Mitchell
| Murray
|
Patry
| Peterson
| Pratt
| Price
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
| Sgro
|
St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| St - Julien
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Strahl
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Vanclief
| Wood – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 101 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 102. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3110
(The House divided on Motion No. 102, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Bellemare
| Bennett
| Boudria
| Bradshaw
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
| Carroll
|
DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
| Discepola
| Drouin
|
Duncan
| Fontana
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
|
Hubbard
| Jackson
| Jennings
| Knutson
|
Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Leung
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Lowther
| Lunn
| Mahoney
|
Matthews
| McCormick
| McDonough
| Minna
|
Mitchell
| Murray
| O'Reilly
| Paradis
|
Patry
| Peterson
| Pratt
| Price
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
| Sgro
|
St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| St - Julien
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Strahl
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Vanclief
| Wood – 58
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 102 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 103. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3115
(The House divided on Motion No. 103, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
– 25
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Bradshaw
| Calder
|
DeVillers
| Discepola
| Drouin
| Duncan
|
Fontana
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Guarnieri
|
Herron
| Hubbard
| Jackson
| Knutson
|
Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Leung
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Lowther
| Lunn
| Mahoney
|
Matthews
| McCormick
| McDonough
| McNally
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
| Murray
| O'Reilly
|
Paradis
| Patry
| Peterson
| Pratt
|
Price
| Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
|
St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| St - Julien
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Torsney – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 103 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 104. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3120
(The House divided on Motion No. 104, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Fournier
|
Guay
| Guimond
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
– 22
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Calder
| Carroll
|
DeVillers
| Discepola
| Fontana
| Godfrey
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
|
Jackson
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Leung
|
Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lowther
| Lunn
|
Mahoney
| Matthews
| McCormick
| McDonough
|
McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Murray
| Paradis
|
Price
| Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
|
St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Torsney
| Wood
– 38
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 104 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 105. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3125
(The House divided on Motion No. 105, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
– 25
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Bryden
| Calder
|
Carroll
| DeVillers
| Discepola
| Drouin
|
Elley
| Fontana
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
| Hubbard
|
Knutson
| Laliberte
| Leung
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Lunn
| Mahoney
| Matthews
|
McCormick
| McDonough
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Murray
| Paradis
| Patry
| Pratt
|
Price
| Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
|
Sgro
| St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
– 41
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 105 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 106. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3130
(The House divided on Motion No. 106, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
– 24
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Bradshaw
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Carroll
| DeVillers
| Drouin
|
Elley
| Fontana
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
| Hubbard
|
Laliberte
| Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
|
Mahoney
| Matthews
| McCormick
| McDonough
|
McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
| Mitchell
|
Murray
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Pratt
| Price
| Ritz
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
| Sgro
|
St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
– 42
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 106 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 107. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3135
(The House divided on Motion No. 107, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Bradshaw
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Carroll
| DeVillers
| Discepola
|
Drouin
| Elley
| Fontana
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
| Hubbard
|
Knutson
| Laliberte
| Leung
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Lunn
| Mahoney
| Matthews
|
McDonough
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
|
Murray
| Normand
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Pratt
| Price
| Ritz
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
| Sgro
|
St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Wood – 43
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 107 lost.
The next question is on Motion 108. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3140
(The House divided on Motion No. 108, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Boudria
| Bradshaw
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Carroll
| Dhaliwal
|
Drouin
| Elley
| Fontana
| Gagliano
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
|
Hubbard
| Knutson
| Laliberte
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Lunn
| Matthews
| McDonough
|
McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
| Mitchell
|
Murray
| Normand
| Patry
| Pratt
|
Price
| Ritz
| Rock
| Schmidt
|
St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Szabo
| Wood – 40
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 108 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 109. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3145
(The House divided on Motion No. 109, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Perron
|
Plamondon
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 28
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Bradshaw
| Bryden
|
Caccia
| Calder
| Caplan
| Carroll
|
DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
| Drouin
| Elley
|
Fontana
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
| Hubbard
|
Jennings
| Knutson
| Laliberte
| Leung
|
Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lunn
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Matthews
| McNally
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Minna
| Mitchell
| Murray
| Normand
|
O'Reilly
| Patry
| Peterson
| Pratt
|
Price
| Ritz
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Schmidt
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Szabo
|
Torsney – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 109 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 110. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3150
(The House divided on Motion No. 110, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guay
| Guimond
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Perron
|
Plamondon
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 28
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Bradshaw
| Bryden
|
Caccia
| Calder
| Caplan
| Carroll
|
DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
| Elley
| Fontana
|
Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
|
Guarnieri
| Herron
| Hubbard
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
|
Knutson
| Laliberte
| Leung
| Limoges
|
Lunn
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
|
McNally
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
|
Mitchell
| Murray
| Normand
| O'Reilly
|
Patry
| Pratt
| Price
| Ritz
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
| Sgro
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Szabo – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 110 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 111. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3155
(The House divided on Motion No. 111, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Fournier
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guay
| Laurin
| Marceau
|
Perron
| Plamondon
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Bellemare
| Bradshaw
| Bryden
| Caccia
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Carroll
| DeVillers
|
Dhaliwal
| Elley
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Herron
| Jennings
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
|
Knutson
| Laliberte
| Leung
| Limoges
|
Lunn
| Matthews
| McNally
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
|
Minna
| Murray
| Normand
| Patry
|
Pratt
| Price
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Schmidt
| Sgro
| St - Julien
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Szabo – 37
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 111 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 112. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3200
(The House divided on Motion No. 112, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Debien
| Desrochers
| Duceppe
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 31
|
NAYS
Members
Assad
| Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Bradshaw
|
Bryden
| Caccia
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Carroll
| Dhaliwal
| Discepola
| Drouin
|
Elley
| Fontana
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Guarnieri
| Jackson
| Jennings
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Knutson
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
|
Leung
| Lincoln
| Mahoney
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Matthews
| McNally
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Minna
|
Mitchell
| Murray
| Normand
| O'Reilly
|
Pagtakhan
| Patry
| Pratt
| Price
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
| Sgro
|
St - Julien
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Szabo
|
Vanclief
| Volpe
| Wood – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 112 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 113. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3205
(The House divided on Motion No. 113, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
|
Crête
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Duceppe
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Marchand
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Bryden
| Caccia
| Caplan
| Carroll
|
Dhaliwal
| Discepola
| Drouin
| Elley
|
Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Guarnieri
| Jackson
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Knutson
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
|
Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Mahoney
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| McDonough
| McNally
|
Minna
| Mitchell
| Normand
| O'Reilly
|
Patry
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Schmidt
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
– 38
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 113 lost.
The next question is on Motion 114. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 114, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Debien
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Bryden
| Caccia
| Calder
| DeVillers
|
Dhaliwal
| Discepola
| Drouin
| Elley
|
Gagliano
| Guarnieri
| Herron
| Jackson
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Knutson
| Laliberte
| Leung
|
Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lunn
| Mahoney
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| McDonough
| McNally
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
| Normand
| O'Reilly
|
Pagtakhan
| Patry
| Peterson
| Pratt
|
Price
| Proctor
| St - Jacques
| St - Julien
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Vanclief
| Wood
– 40
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 114 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 115. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3210
(The House divided on Motion No. 115, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean) – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Caccia
| Calder
| Carroll
|
Drouin
| Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Knutson
| Leung
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Lunn
| Mahoney
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Matthews
| McDonough
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Minna
| Mitchell
| Normand
| O'Reilly
|
Pagtakhan
| Patry
| Peterson
| Pratt
|
Proctor
| Robillard
| St - Jacques
| St - Julien
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Szabo
| Volpe
| Wood – 36
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 115 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 116. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3215
(The House divided on Motion No. 116, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau – 19
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Axworthy
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Carroll
| DeVillers
| Discepola
| Drouin
|
Earle
| Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
|
Hubbard
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Laliberte
| Leung
|
Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lunn
| Mahoney
|
Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| McDonough
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
| Mitchell
|
O'Reilly
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
| Peterson
|
Proctor
| Ritz
| Robillard
| St - Jacques
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Volpe
| Wood – 39
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 116 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 117. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3220
(The House divided on Motion No. 117, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
– 20
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Boudria
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Carroll
| Catterall
| DeVillers
| Discepola
|
Drouin
| Earle
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
|
Godfrey
| Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
|
Hubbard
| Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
|
Lunn
| Mahoney
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
| Mitchell
|
Murray
| O'Reilly
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Proctor
| Ritz
| Robillard
|
Schmidt
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Volpe
|
Wood – 41
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 117 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 118. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3225
(The House divided on Motion No. 118, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Boudria
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
| Desjarlais
|
DeVillers
| Discepola
| Drouin
| Earle
|
Fontana
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
|
Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
| Hubbard
|
Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lunn
|
Mahoney
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| McDonough
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Mitchell
| Murray
|
O'Reilly
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
| Peterson
|
Price
| Proctor
| Ritz
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Schmidt
| Sgro
| St - Jacques
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Volpe
| Wood – 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 118 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 119. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3230
(The House divided on Motion No. 119, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Boudria
| Caccia
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
|
Desjarlais
| DeVillers
| Discepola
| Drouin
|
Earle
| Fontana
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
|
Godfrey
| Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
|
Hubbard
| Ianno
| Leung
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Mahoney
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Matthews
| McDonough
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Mitchell
|
Murray
| O'Reilly
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Price
| Proctor
| Ritz
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
| Sgro
|
St - Julien
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Volpe
|
Wood – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 119 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 120. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3235
(The House divided on Motion No. 120, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Catterall
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
|
Drouin
| Earle
| Elley
| Fontana
|
Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
| Hubbard
|
Ianno
| Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
|
Lunn
| Mahoney
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Matthews
| McDonough
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Mitchell
|
Murray
| Normand
| Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
|
Patry
| Peterson
| Pratt
| Price
|
Proctor
| Ritz
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Schmidt
| Sgro
| St - Julien
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Volpe
| Wood – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 120 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 121. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3240
(The House divided on Motion No. 121, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Catterall
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
|
Drouin
| Earle
| Elley
| Fontana
|
Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
| Hubbard
|
Ianno
| Leung
| Limoges
| Lunn
|
Mahoney
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
|
McDonough
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Murray
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
|
Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Schmidt
| Sgro
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Volpe
| Wood – 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 121 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 122. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
Some hon. members: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3245
(The House divided on Motion No. 122, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Cardin
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp – 19
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Catterall
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
|
Drouin
| Earle
| Elley
| Fontana
|
Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Guarnieri
| Herron
| Hubbard
|
Leung
| Limoges
| Lunn
| Mahoney
|
Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| McDonough
|
McNally
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Mitchell
|
Murray
| Normand
| Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
|
Patry
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Ritz
| Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
|
Sgro
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Wood – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 122 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 123. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3250
(The House divided on Motion No. 123, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Copps
| Desjarlais
| Dhaliwal
|
Discepola
| Drouin
| Earle
| Elley
|
Fontana
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Herron
|
Hubbard
| Ianno
| Leung
| Limoges
|
Lunn
| Mahoney
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Matthews
| McDonough
| McNally
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
| Mitchell
| Murray
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
|
Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
| Ritz
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
| St - Julien
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Wood – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 123 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 124. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3255
(The House divided on Motion No. 124, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Caccia
| Caplan
|
Copps
| Desjarlais
| Drouin
| Earle
|
Elley
| Fontana
| Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Herron
|
Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lunn
|
Mahoney
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
|
McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
| Murray
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
|
Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
| Ritz
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
| St - Julien
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Wood – 43
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
124 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 125. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 125, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bellemare
| Caccia
| Caplan
|
Catterall
| Copps
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
|
Drouin
| Earle
| Elley
| Gagliano
|
Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
|
Grose
| Guarnieri
| Herron
| Ianno
|
Jennings
| Jordan
| Knutson
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Lunn
| Mahoney
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Matthews
| McNally
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Minna
| Murray
| Normand
| Nystrom
|
Pagtakhan
| Patry
| Pratt
| Price
|
Proctor
| Ritz
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Schmidt
| Sgro
| St - Julien
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Volpe
| Wood – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
125 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 126.
3300
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 126, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
| Boudria
|
Bradshaw
| Caccia
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Carroll
| Catterall
| Copps
| Desjarlais
|
Discepola
| Drouin
| Earle
| Elley
|
Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grose
| Guarnieri
| Herron
| Jennings
|
Knutson
| Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
|
Lunn
| Mahoney
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
McNally
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
|
Murray
| Normand
| Nystrom
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Ritz
| Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
|
Serré
| Sgro
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Volpe
| Wood – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
126 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 127.
3305
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 127, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
| Bradshaw
|
Brown
| Caccia
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Carroll
| Catterall
| Copps
| Desjarlais
|
Discepola
| Drouin
| Earle
| Elley
|
Fontana
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grose
| Herron
| Jennings
|
Knutson
| Leung
| Limoges
| Mahoney
|
Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| McDonough
| McNally
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
| Murray
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
| Peterson
|
Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
| Ritz
|
Rock
| Schmidt
| Serré
| Sgro
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Volpe
| Wood – 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
127 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 128.
3310
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 128, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bakopanos
| Bradshaw
| Brown
|
Caccia
| Calder
| Caplan
| Carroll
|
Catterall
| Copps
| Desjarlais
| Dhaliwal
|
Discepola
| Drouin
| Earle
| Elley
|
Fontana
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
|
Grose
| Herron
| Jennings
| Knutson
|
Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Mahoney
|
Matthews
| McDonough
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Minna
| Murray
| Normand
| Nystrom
|
Pagtakhan
| Patry
| Peterson
| Pratt
|
Price
| Proctor
| Ritz
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Schmidt
| Serré
| Sgro
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Volpe
| Wood – 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
128 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 129.
3315
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 129, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Venne – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
| Bradshaw
|
Brown
| Caccia
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Carroll
| Catterall
| Copps
| Desjarlais
|
Dhaliwal
| Discepola
| Drouin
| Earle
|
Elley
| Fontana
| Godfrey
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grose
| Herron
| Jennings
| Knutson
|
Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Mahoney
|
Marleau
| Matthews
| McDonough
| McNally
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
| Murray
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| Patry
| Peterson
| Pratt
|
Price
| Proctor
| Ritz
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Schmidt
| Serré
| Sgro
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Volpe
| Wood – 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
129 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 130.
3320
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 130, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
| Boudria
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
| Copps
|
Davies
| Desjarlais
| Dhaliwal
| Discepola
|
Drouin
| Earle
| Elley
| Fontana
|
Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grewal
|
Grose
| Guarnieri
| Herron
| Ianno
|
Jennings
| Knutson
| Leung
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Mahoney
| Marleau
| Matthews
|
McDonough
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
|
Murray
| Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Ritz
| Robillard
| Schmidt
| Serré
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Wood – 55
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
130 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 131. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour of
the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3325
(The House divided on Motion No. 131, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
| Boudria
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Carroll
| Copps
| Davies
|
Desjarlais
| Dhaliwal
| Discepola
| Drouin
|
Earle
| Elley
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grewal
| Grose
| Guarnieri
|
Herron
| Jennings
| Leung
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
|
McDonough
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
|
Murray
| Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Ritz
| Robillard
| Schmidt
| Serré
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
– 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 131 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 132. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3330
(The House divided on Motion No. 132, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
| Boudria
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Carroll
| Casey
| Catterall
| Copps
|
Davies
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
| Drouin
|
Earle
| Elley
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grewal
| Grose
| Herron
|
Ianno
| Jennings
| Knutson
| Limoges
|
Lincoln
| Lunn
| Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Matthews
| McDonough
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
|
Murray
| Nystrom
| Patry
| Peterson
|
Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
| Ritz
|
Robillard
| Schmidt
| Serré
| Sgro
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
– 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 132 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 133. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3335
(The House divided on Motion No. 133, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Bakopanos
| Bellemare
| Boudria
| Bradshaw
|
Brown
| Calder
| Caplan
| Casey
|
Catterall
| Copps
| Davies
| Desjarlais
|
Discepola
| Drouin
| Earle
| Elley
|
Godfrey
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grewal
| Grose
|
Guarnieri
| Jennings
| Karygiannis
| Knutson
|
Limoges
| Lincoln
| Marleau
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| McDonough
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Minna
| Murray
| Nystrom
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Price
| Proctor
| Ritz
|
Robillard
| Schmidt
| Serré
| Sgro
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland) – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 133 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 134. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3340
(The House divided on Motion No. 134, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
| Boudria
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Casey
| Catterall
| Copps
| Davies
|
Desjarlais
| Drouin
| Earle
| Elley
|
Godfrey
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grewal
| Grose
|
Guarnieri
| Herron
| Jennings
| Karygiannis
|
Knutson
| Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
|
Lunn
| Marleau
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
|
McDonough
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
| Murray
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Price
| Proctor
| Ritz
|
Robillard
| Schmidt
| Serré
| Sgro
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland) – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 134 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 135. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3345
(The House divided on Motion No. 135, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
| Boudria
|
Bradshaw
| Calder
| Caplan
| Casey
|
Catterall
| Charbonneau
| Copps
| Davies
|
Desjarlais
| Discepola
| Drouin
| Earle
|
Elley
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grewal
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Herron
|
Jennings
| Karygiannis
| Knutson
| Leung
|
Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lunn
| Marleau
|
Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Matthews
| McDonough
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Minna
| Murray
| Normand
| Nystrom
|
O'Brien
(Labrador)
| Patry
| Peterson
| Price
|
Proctor
| Ritz
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Schmidt
| Serré
| Sgro
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
– 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 135 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 136.
3350
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 136, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
|
Boudria
| Bradshaw
| Byrne
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
| Charbonneau
|
Copps
| Davies
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
|
Drouin
| Earle
| Elley
| Gagliano
|
Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grewal
|
Grose
| Guarnieri
| Ianno
| Jennings
|
Karygiannis
| Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
|
Lunn
| Marleau
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Matthews
|
McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
| Murray
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Price
| Proctor
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Schmidt
| Serré
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Volpe – 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 136 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 137.
3355
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 137, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
|
Boudria
| Bradshaw
| Byrne
| Caccia
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
|
Charbonneau
| Copps
| Davies
| Desjarlais
|
Discepola
| Earle
| Elley
| Gallaway
|
Godfrey
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grewal
| Grose
|
Guarnieri
| Harvey
| Herron
| Ianno
|
Jennings
| Karygiannis
| Limoges
| Lincoln
|
Lunn
| Mahoney
| Marleau
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
|
Matthews
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Minna
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Price
| Proctor
| Ritz
|
Rock
| Schmidt
| Serré
| Sgro
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Volpe – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 137 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 138.
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
3400
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 138, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 23
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
|
Bradshaw
| Byrne
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
| Copps
|
Davies
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
| Earle
|
Elley
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grewal
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harvey
|
Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
| Karygiannis
|
Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Mahoney
|
Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Matthews
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Minna
| Normand
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
|
Patry
| Pillitteri
| Price
| Proctor
|
Ritz
| Rock
| Schmidt
| Sgro
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Volpe – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 138 lost.
3405
The next question is on Motion No. 139. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 139, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
| Bradshaw
|
Byrne
| Caccia
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Carroll
| Catterall
| Charbonneau
| Copps
|
Davies
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
| Earle
|
Elley
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grewal
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harvey
|
Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
| Karygiannis
|
Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Mahoney
|
Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Minna
| Normand
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
|
Pagtakhan
| Patry
| Pillitteri
| Price
|
Proctor
| Ritz
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Schmidt
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Volpe – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 139 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 140. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3410
(The House divided on Motion No. 140, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
| Bradshaw
|
Brown
| Byrne
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Carroll
| Catterall
| Charbonneau
| Copps
|
Davies
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
| Drouin
|
Earle
| Elley
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
|
Godfrey
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grewal
| Grose
|
Guarnieri
| Harvard
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
| Jennings
| Karygiannis
|
Knutson
| Leung
| Limoges
| Lincoln
|
Lunn
| Mahoney
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Matthews
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
|
Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Price
| Proctor
|
Ritz
| Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
|
Serré
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Volpe – 59
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 140 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 141. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3415
(The House divided on Motion No. 141, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne
– 22
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Byrne
| Caccia
|
Calder
| Carroll
| Charbonneau
| Copps
|
Davies
| Desjarlais
| Drouin
| Earle
|
Elley
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
|
Grewal
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harvard
|
Harvey
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
|
Jennings
| Karygiannis
| Knutson
| Leung
|
Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lunn
| Mahoney
|
Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
| Pagtakhan
|
Patry
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Price
|
Proctor
| Richardson
| Ritz
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Schmidt
| Volpe – 55
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 141 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 142. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3420
(The House divided on Motion No. 142, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp – 18
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Caccia
| Charbonneau
|
Copps
| Davies
| Desjarlais
| Dhaliwal
|
Discepola
| Drouin
| Earle
| Elley
|
Fontana
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
|
Grewal
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harvard
|
Harvey
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
|
Jennings
| Karygiannis
| Knutson
| Leung
|
Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lunn
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
| Pagtakhan
|
Patry
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Price
|
Richardson
| Ritz
| Robillard
| Schmidt
|
Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vautour
| Volpe – 55
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 142 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 143. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3425
(The House divided on Motion No. 143, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp
| Venne – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Boudria
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Caccia
| Carroll
|
Charbonneau
| Copps
| Davies
| Desjarlais
|
Dhaliwal
| Discepola
| Earle
| Elley
|
Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Grewal
| Grose
|
Guarnieri
| Harvard
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
| Karygiannis
| Knutson
|
Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lunn
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
| Pettigrew
|
Pillitteri
| Proctor
| Richardson
| Ritz
|
Robillard
| Schmidt
| Serré
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vautour
| Volpe – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 143 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 144. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3430
(The House divided on Motion No. 144, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Lefebvre
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Turp
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Boudria
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Byrne
| Caccia
|
Calder
| Carroll
| Catterall
| Charbonneau
|
Copps
| Davies
| Desjarlais
| Dhaliwal
|
Discepola
| Earle
| Elley
| Gagliano
|
Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grewal
|
Grose
| Harvard
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
|
Jennings
| Limoges
| Lincoln
| Lunn
|
Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Matthews
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Price
|
Proctor
| Richardson
| Ritz
| Robillard
|
Schmidt
| Serré
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vautour
| Volpe – 55
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 144 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 145. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour of
the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the nays
have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3435
(The House divided on Motion No. 145, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Brien
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Lefebvre
|
Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp
– 19
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Boudria
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Byrne
| Caccia
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
|
Charbonneau
| Copps
| Dhaliwal
| Discepola
|
Earle
| Elley
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
|
Godfrey
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grewal
| Grose
|
Guarnieri
| Harvard
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
|
Jennings
| Karygiannis
| Lincoln
| Lunn
|
Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Matthews
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
| Peterson
|
Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Price
| Richardson
|
Ritz
| Robillard
| Schmidt
| Serré
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vautour
|
Volpe – 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 145 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 146. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
.=3440
(The House divided on Motion No. 146, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Lefebvre
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Boudria
|
Brown
| Byrne
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
| Charbonneau
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Copps
| Dhaliwal
| Earle
|
Elley
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grewal
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harvard
|
Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jennings
| Karygiannis
|
Leung
| Lincoln
| Lunn
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
|
Matthews
| McDonough
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Price
|
Richardson
| Ritz
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Schmidt
| Serré
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vautour
– 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 146 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 147. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3445
(The House divided on Motion No. 147, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Lefebvre
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Bailey
| Bellemare
| Boudria
| Brown
|
Byrne
| Caccia
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Carroll
| Catterall
| Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Copps
| Davies
| Dhaliwal
| Earle
|
Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Grewal
| Guarnieri
|
Harvard
| Harvey
| Herron
| Karygiannis
|
Leung
| Lincoln
| Lunn
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
|
Matthews
| McDonough
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Price
|
Richardson
| Ritz
| Robillard
| Schmidt
|
Serré
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
|
Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vautour
– 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 147 lost.
3450
The next question is on Motion No. 148. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 148, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Lefebvre
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 23
|
NAYS
Members
Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
| Boudria
|
Brown
| Byrne
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Carroll
| Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Copps
|
Davies
| Dhaliwal
| Earle
| Elley
|
Gallaway
| Grewal
| Grose
| Guarnieri
|
Harvard
| Harvey
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
|
Karygiannis
| Leung
| Lincoln
| Lunn
|
Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Matthews
| McDonough
| McNally
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Normand
| Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
|
Patry
| Peterson
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
|
Richardson
| Ritz
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Schmidt
| Serré
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vautour
– 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 148 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 149.
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
3455
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 149, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Brien
|
Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
|
Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 19
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Bellemare
| Boudria
| Brown
| Byrne
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
|
Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Copps
| Davies
|
Dhaliwal
| Earle
| Elley
| Gagliano
|
Gallaway
| Graham
| Grewal
| Grose
|
Guarnieri
| Harvard
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Karygiannis
| Leung
| Lincoln
|
Lunn
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Matthews
| McDonough
|
McNally
| McTeague
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Nystrom
|
Pagtakhan
| Patry
| Peterson
| Pettigrew
|
Pillitteri
| Richardson
| Ritz
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Schmidt
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vautour – 56
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
149 lost.
3500
[Translation]
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): The next question is on
Motion No. 170. I have just checked with the clerks and we are
moving to Motion No. 170 because of the grouping that has been
done. We shall go back to Motion No. 150 in a few minutes.
An hon. member: This is a very important motion.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): We will keep that in mind.
[English]
The next question is on Motion No. 170. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3505
(The House divided on Motion No. 170, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Brien
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne
– 22
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Bellemare
| Boudria
| Brown
| Byrne
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Catterall
| Charbonneau
|
Copps
| Davies
| Dhaliwal
| Earle
|
Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Graham
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grewal
| Grose
| Harvard
|
Harvey
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Karygiannis
|
Leung
| Lincoln
| Martin
(Esquimalt – Juan de Fuca)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Matthews
| McDonough
| McNally
| McTeague
|
Morrison
| Normand
| Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
|
Pankiw
| Patry
| Peterson
| Pettigrew
|
Pillitteri
| Price
| Richardson
| Rock
|
Schmidt
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Stinson
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vautour
– 55
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
170 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 171. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3510
(The House divided on Motion No. 171, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp
| Venne – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Brown
| Byrne
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Catterall
| Charbonneau
| Copps
| Davies
|
Dhaliwal
| Discepola
| Earle
| Gagliano
|
Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grewal
| Grose
| Harvard
| Herron
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Karygiannis
| Lincoln
| Mahoney
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| McDonough
| McNally
|
McTeague
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Morrison
| Normand
|
Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Pankiw
| Patry
|
Peterson
| Pillitteri
| Price
| Proctor
|
Richardson
| Rock
| Schmidt
| Sekora
|
Serré
| St - Jacques
| Stinson
| Vautour
|
Vellacott
| Volpe – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
171 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 173. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3515
(The House divided on Motion No. 173, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne
– 22
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Bellemare
| Brown
| Byrne
| Caplan
|
Catterall
| Charbonneau
| Copps
| Davies
|
Desjarlais
| Dhaliwal
| Earle
| Gagliano
|
Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grewal
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harvard
|
Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Karygiannis
| Knutson
|
Mahoney
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| McDonough
|
McNally
| McTeague
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Morrison
|
Nystrom
| Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Pankiw
|
Patry
| Pillitteri
| Price
| Proctor
|
Richardson
| Robillard
| Rock
| Schmidt
|
Sekora
| Serré
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Vellacott
| Volpe
|
Wappel – 57
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
173 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Yvan Bernier: Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I
have been in this House since the voting started last night. I
have seen all sorts of things happening. What has just happened
is the House of Commons game. Members have to answer questions
when the time is right, and they have to face the consequences
of their mistakes.
3520
I feel the need to point out that, when one of our members was
not in his seat last night—he was in the House but not in his
seat—we lost a motion, namely Motion No. 84. What has happened
just now is that the Liberals were asleep at the switch, and I
think they ought to live with the consequences.
Your slowness in acknowledging that they were not standing casts
somewhat of a shadow over your impartiality, Madam Speaker.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I can assure the hon. member—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): Order, please. I can
assure the hon. member that I saw four Liberal members on their
feet here, plus one more right at the back of the room. He was
standing, right at the back. So, there were five in all.
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): The next question is on—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
The Deputy Speaker: Order, please. I will not accept the
behaviour of the member whose riding I shall not name for the
moment. I caution the hon. member that, if he does not calm
down, I shall take the necessary steps.
Mr. Gilles Duceppe: Madam Speaker, I think everyone is tired.
That is understandable.
What I wish to ask, however—and we have it on tape—it takes—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
Mr. Gilles Duceppe: Could the hooligans be asked—
An hon. member: That is what happens to cheaters.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): Another comment from the
hon. member and I will be forced to take the necessary steps and
name him. For the moment, the hon. leader of the Bloc Quebecois
has the floor.
Mr. Gilles Duceppe: Madam Speaker, I would have appreciated it
if you had asked the hooligans across the floor to pipe down
while I was speaking, but you did not.
That said, and we have it on the tape, members are taking a good
45 seconds to rise. In future, I would request that you not give
them a signal to stand but let them act on their own, as happened
this time.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): That is an accusation which
I reject outright, because I have never signalled any member or
told any member to rise. Let that be clear.
[English]
The next question is on Motion No. 175. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more that five members having risen:
3525
(The House divided on Motion No. 175, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 23
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Bellemare
| Boudria
| Bradshaw
| Byrne
|
Caccia
| Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
|
Charbonneau
| Comuzzi
| Copps
| Davies
|
Desjarlais
| Dhaliwal
| Earle
| Gagliano
|
Godfrey
| Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grose
|
Guarnieri
| Harvard
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
|
Karygiannis
| Knutson
| Leung
| Lincoln
|
Mahoney
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| McDonough
|
McNally
| McTeague
| Morrison
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Pankiw
|
Patry
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Price
|
Proctor
| Richardson
| Robillard
| Sekora
|
Serré
| Speller
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vautour
|
Vellacott
| Volpe
| Wappel – 63
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
175 lost.
3530
The next question is on Motion No. 179. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 179, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
|
Boudria
| Byrne
| Caccia
| Caplan
|
Carroll
| Catterall
| Comuzzi
| Copps
|
Davies
| Dhaliwal
| Earle
| Gagliano
|
Godfrey
| Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grose
|
Guarnieri
| Harvard
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
|
Karygiannis
| Knutson
| Leung
| Lincoln
|
Mahoney
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| McGuire
|
McNally
| McTeague
| Morrison
| Nystrom
|
Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Pankiw
| Patry
|
Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Price
| Proctor
|
Richardson
| Robillard
| Sekora
| Serré
|
St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Vautour
|
Vellacott
| Wappel – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
179 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 182.
3535
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3540
(The House divided on Motion No. 182, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Turp
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
|
Boudria
| Brown
| Byrne
| Caccia
|
Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
| Copps
|
Davies
| Dhaliwal
| Dockrill
| Drouin
|
Earle
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
|
Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grose
| Guarnieri
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Karygiannis
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Mahoney
| Matthews
| McGuire
|
McNally
| McTeague
| Morrison
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Pankiw
| Patry
|
Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Price
| Proctor
|
Richardson
| Robillard
| Sekora
| Serré
|
St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Vautour
|
Vellacott
| Wappel – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
182 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 184. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3545
(The House divided on Motion No. 184, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
|
Boudria
| Brown
| Byrne
| Caccia
|
Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
| Copps
|
Davies
| Dhaliwal
| Dockrill
| Drouin
|
Earle
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Graham
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harvard
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Karygiannis
| Leung
| Lincoln
|
Mahoney
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| McGuire
|
McNally
| McTeague
| Morrison
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| Pagtakhan
| Pankiw
| Patry
|
Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Price
| Proctor
|
Richardson
| Rock
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Sekora
|
St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Vautour
| Vellacott
|
Volpe – 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
184 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 187.
3550
(The House divided on Motion No. 187, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 21
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
|
Boudria
| Brown
| Byrne
| Caccia
|
Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
| Copps
|
Davies
| Dhaliwal
| Dockrill
| Drouin
|
Earle
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
|
Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grose
| Guarnieri
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Karygiannis
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Mahoney
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
|
McGuire
| McNally
| McTeague
| Minna
|
Morrison
| Normand
| Nystrom
| Pankiw
|
Patry
| Pillitteri
| Price
| Proctor
|
Richardson
| Rock
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Sekora
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vautour
| Vellacott
|
Volpe – 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
187 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 191. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour of the
motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3555
(The House divided on Motion No. 191, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bailey
| Bellemare
| Boudria
|
Brown
| Caccia
| Caplan
| Carroll
|
Catterall
| Copps
| Davies
| Dhaliwal
|
Discepola
| Dockrill
| Drouin
| Earle
|
Fontana
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Graham
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harvard
|
Harvey
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Karygiannis
| Lincoln
|
Mahoney
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| McGuire
|
McNally
| McTeague
| Minna
| Morrison
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| Pankiw
| Patry
|
Pillitteri
| Price
| Proctor
| Richardson
|
Rock
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Sekora
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Stinson
| Vautour
| Vellacott
| Volpe – 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
191 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 193. Is the House ready for
the question?
Some hon. members: Question.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3600
(The House divided on Motion No. 193, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 21
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
| Boudria
|
Brown
| Byrne
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Carroll
| Catterall
| Charbonneau
|
Davies
| Dhaliwal
| Discepola
| Dockrill
|
Drouin
| Earle
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
|
Godfrey
| Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grose
|
Guarnieri
| Harvey
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
|
Karygiannis
| Leung
| Lincoln
| Mahoney
|
Matthews
| McDonough
| McGuire
| McTeague
|
Minna
| Morrison
| Normand
| Nystrom
|
Pagtakhan
| Pankiw
| Pillitteri
| Price
|
Proctor
| Proud
| Richardson
| Rock
|
Scott
(Skeena)
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
|
Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vautour
| Vellacott
| Volpe
|
Wappel – 57
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
193 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 198. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3605
(The House divided on Motion No. 198, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 20
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
| Bertrand
|
Brown
| Caccia
| Calder
| Carroll
|
Catterall
| Clouthier
| Davies
| Dhaliwal
|
Dockrill
| Drouin
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Gallaway
| Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grose
|
Guarnieri
| Harvey
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Karygiannis
|
Lincoln
| Mahoney
| Matthews
| McDonough
|
McGuire
| McTeague
| Minna
| Morrison
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| Pankiw
| Pettigrew
|
Pillitteri
| Price
| Proctor
| Proud
|
Rock
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Stinson
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vellacott
| Volpe – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
198 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 199. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3610
(The House divided on Motion No. 199, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Brien
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 17
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
| Bertrand
|
Borotsik
| Brown
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Casey
| Catterall
| Clouthier
| Davies
|
Desjarlais
| Dhaliwal
| Drouin
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Gallaway
| Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grose
| Harvey
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Karygiannis
|
Matthews
| McDonough
| McGuire
| McTeague
|
Minna
| Morrison
| Normand
| Nystrom
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
|
Proud
| Robillard
| Rock
| Scott
(Skeena)
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Vellacott
| Volpe
|
Wappel – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
199 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 201. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 201, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Brien
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 15
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
| Bertrand
|
Borotsik
| Brown
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Catterall
| Cauchon
| Davies
| Desjarlais
|
Duhamel
| Earle
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
|
Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Harvard
| Harvey
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Karygiannis
| Knutson
| McDonough
|
McGuire
| McTeague
| Minna
| Morrison
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Pettigrew
|
Proctor
| Robillard
| Rock
| Scott
(Skeena)
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Vellacott
| Volpe
|
Wappel – 41
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 201 lost.
3615
The next question is on Motion No. 204. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 204, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 16
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bailey
| Bellemare
| Bertrand
|
Borotsik
| Brown
| Byrne
| Caccia
|
Catterall
| Cauchon
| Comuzzi
| Davies
|
Desjarlais
| Duhamel
| Earle
| Gallaway
|
Godfrey
| Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Harvard
|
Harvey
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Karygiannis
| Knutson
|
Marleau
| Minna
| Morrison
| Nystrom
|
Pettigrew
| Proctor
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Scott
(Skeena)
| Speller
| Vellacott
| Volpe
|
Wappel
| Wilfert – 38
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 204 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 211. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3620
(The House divided on Motion No. 211, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 19
|
NAYS
Members
Bertrand
| Borotsik
| Brown
| Byrne
|
Caccia
| Calder
| Casey
| Cauchon
|
Comuzzi
| Davies
| Desjarlais
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Graham
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Harvard
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jennings
| Karygiannis
| Knutson
|
Lincoln
| Mahoney
| Marleau
| McTeague
|
Morrison
| Nault
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
Pettigrew
| Proctor
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Scott
(Skeena)
| Speller
| St - Jacques
| Stinson
|
Volpe
| Wappel
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 211 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 215. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3625
(The House divided on Motion No. 215, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Cardin
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 18
|
NAYS
Members
Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Borotsik
| Brown
|
Byrne
| Caccia
| Casey
| Cauchon
|
Comuzzi
| Davies
| Desjarlais
| Dion
|
Earle
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Graham
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jennings
|
Karygiannis
| Knutson
| Lincoln
| Marleau
|
Matthews
| Morrison
| Nault
| Nystrom
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Pettigrew
| Price
| Proctor
|
Richardson
| Robillard
| Saada
| Scott
(Skeena)
|
Speller
| St - Jacques
| Stinson
| Volpe
|
Wappel
| Whelan – 42
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 215 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 219. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3630
(The House divided on Motion No. 219, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Cardin
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 16
|
NAYS
Members
Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Borotsik
| Brown
|
Byrne
| Caccia
| Casey
| Catterall
|
Cauchon
| Comuzzi
| Davies
| Desjarlais
|
Dion
| Earle
| Easter
| Godfrey
|
Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jennings
|
Karygiannis
| Knutson
| Lincoln
| Marleau
|
Matthews
| Nault
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
Obhrai
| Proctor
| Richardson
| Robillard
|
Saada
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Serré
| Speller
|
St - Jacques
| Stinson
| Valeri
| Volpe
|
Wappel
| Whelan – 42
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 219 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 222. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3635
(The House divided on Motion No. 222, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Cardin
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Venne – 17
|
NAYS
Members
Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Borotsik
| Brown
|
Byrne
| Caccia
| Calder
| Casey
|
Casson
| Cauchon
| Comuzzi
| Davies
|
Desjarlais
| Dion
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Godfrey
| Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Harvard
|
Jackson
| Jennings
| Karygiannis
| Lincoln
|
Marleau
| Matthews
| Nault
| Nystrom
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Obhrai
| Pankiw
| Pettigrew
|
Proctor
| Richardson
| Robillard
| Saada
|
Scott
(Skeena)
| Serré
| Speller
| St - Jacques
|
Stinson
| Valeri
| Volpe
| Wappel
|
Whelan – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 222 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 224. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 224, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Cardin
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne – 19
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Borotsik
|
Brown
| Byrne
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Casey
| Casson
| Catterall
| Cauchon
|
Coderre
| Comuzzi
| Davies
| Desjarlais
|
Dion
| Duhamel
| Earle
| Godfrey
|
Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Harvard
| Hubbard
|
Jackson
| Jennings
| Karygiannis
| Lincoln
|
Marleau
| McNally
| Nault
| Nystrom
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Obhrai
| Pankiw
| Pettigrew
|
Pillitteri
| Proctor
| Proud
| Redman
|
Richardson
| Saada
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Serré
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| Stinson
|
Valeri
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 224 lost.
.640
The next question is on Motion No. 225. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 225, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Cardin
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Mercier
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 20
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Byrne
|
Caccia
| Calder
| Casey
| Casson
|
Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
|
Coderre
| Comuzzi
| Davies
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Harvard
| Hubbard
| Ianno
| Jackson
|
Jennings
| Karygiannis
| Leung
| Lincoln
|
MacAulay
| McNally
| Nault
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Obhrai
| Pankiw
|
Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
| Proud
|
Proulx
| Redman
| Saada
| Scott
(Skeena)
|
Sekora
| Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Jacques
|
Stinson
| Wilfert – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 225 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 227. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3645
(The House divided on Motion No. 227, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Cardin
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Byrne
|
Calder
| Casey
| Casson
| Catterall
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
| Coderre
| Comuzzi
|
Davies
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
|
Duhamel
| Earle
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
|
Graham
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Harvard
| Hubbard
|
Ianno
| Jackson
| Jennings
| Karygiannis
|
Leung
| Lincoln
| MacAulay
| McGuire
|
McNally
| McTeague
| Nault
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Obhrai
| Pankiw
|
Pettigrew
| Proctor
| Proud
| Proulx
|
Saada
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Sekora
| Shepherd
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| Vautour
| Whelan
|
Wilfert – 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 227 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 229. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3650
(The House divided on Motion No. 229, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Cardin
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 20
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Augustine
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Bélair
| Bellemare
| Byrne
| Calder
|
Casey
| Casson
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
|
Coderre
| Comuzzi
| Davies
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Drouin
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
|
Godfrey
| Graham
| Harvard
| Hubbard
|
Ianno
| Jackson
| Jennings
| Karygiannis
|
Leung
| Lincoln
| MacAulay
| McGuire
|
McNally
| McTeague
| Nault
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Obhrai
| Pankiw
|
Peric
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
|
Proud
| Saada
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Sekora
|
Shepherd
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Vautour
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 55
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 229 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 231. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3655
(The House divided on Motion No. 231, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Cardin
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne
– 22
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Augustine
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bellemare
| Byrne
|
Calder
| Casey
| Casson
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Coderre
| Desjarlais
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Drouin
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Godfrey
| Graham
| Harvard
| Harvey
|
Hubbard
| Ianno
| Jackson
| Karygiannis
|
Knutson
| Leung
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
McGuire
| McNally
| McTeague
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Obhrai
| Pankiw
|
Paradis
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
|
Proud
| Saada
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Sekora
|
Serré
| Shepherd
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Vautour
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 56
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 231 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 234. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3700
(The House divided on Motion No. 234, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Cardin
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne
– 22
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Augustine
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
|
Borotsik
| Calder
| Casey
| Casson
|
Cauchon
| Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Coderre
|
Desjarlais
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Drouin
|
Duhamel
| Earle
| Godfrey
| Graham
|
Harvard
| Harvey
| Jackson
| Johnston
|
Karygiannis
| Knutson
| Leung
| Lincoln
|
Longfield
| McGuire
| McNally
| McTeague
|
Minna
| Nault
| Normand
| Nystrom
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Obhrai
| Pankiw
| Paradis
|
Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
| Proud
|
Shepherd
| Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Ur
| Vautour
|
Wappel
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 59
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 234 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 235. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the
motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3705
(The House divided on Motion No. 235, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Turp
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bailey
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Borotsik
| Casey
| Casson
|
Cauchon
| Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Desjarlais
|
Dhaliwal
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Drouin
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
| Earle
| Goodale
|
Graham
| Harvard
| Harvey
| Ianno
|
Jackson
| Johnston
| Karygiannis
| Knutson
|
Leung
| Lincoln
| Longfield
| McGuire
|
McNally
| Minna
| Murray
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| Obhrai
| Pankiw
| Paradis
|
Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
| Proud
|
Rock
| Saada
| Shepherd
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
|
Ur
| Vautour
| Wappel
| Whelan
|
Wilfert – 61
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 235 lost.
The next question is on Motion 237. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3710
(The House divided on Motion No. 237, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp
|
Venne – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bailey
|
Bakopanos
| Bélair
| Bellemare
| Borotsik
|
Casey
| Casson
| Catterall
| Cauchon
|
Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Desjarlais
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Drouin
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Easter
| Gagliano
| Goodale
|
Graham
| Harb
| Harvard
| Harvey
|
Ianno
| Jackson
| Johnston
| Karygiannis
|
Knutson
| Leung
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
McGuire
| McNally
| Minna
| Morrison
|
Murray
| Normand
| Nystrom
| Obhrai
|
Pankiw
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
| Proud
|
Rock
| Saada
| Shepherd
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Ur
| Valeri
| Vautour
|
Wappel
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 63
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 237 lost.
3715
The next question is on Motion No. 238. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3720
(The House divided on Motion No. 238, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Turp
| Venne
– 22
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bailey
|
Bakopanos
| Bélair
| Bellemare
| Borotsik
|
Brown
| Byrne
| Caccia
| Caplan
|
Casey
| Cauchon
| Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Davies
| Desjarlais
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
| Earle
| Easter
|
Fontana
| Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
|
Graham
| Harb
| Harvard
| Harvey
|
Jackson
| Jennings
| Johnston
| Karygiannis
|
Knutson
| Leung
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
Manley
| McGuire
| McNally
| Minna
|
Morrison
| Murray
| Nault
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Pankiw
|
Peric
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
|
Proud
| Rock
| Saada
| Shepherd
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Steckle
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Wappel
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 72
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 238 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 240. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3725
(The House divided on Motion No. 240, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 21
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bakopanos
|
Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
|
Borotsik
| Brown
| Caccia
| Caplan
|
Casey
| Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chan
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Davies
| Dion
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Easter
| Fontana
| Gagliano
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Graham
| Harb
|
Harvard
| Jackson
| Jennings
| Johnston
|
Karygiannis
| Knutson
| Leung
| Lincoln
|
Maloney
| Manley
| McGuire
| McNally
|
Minna
| Morrison
| Murray
| Nault
|
Normand
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Pagtakhan
|
Peric
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
|
Proud
| Proulx
| Rock
| Saada
|
Sgro
| Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
|
Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
|
Ur
| Valeri
| Wilfert – 67
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 240 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 266. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3730
(The House divided on Motion No. 266, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Beaumier
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Borotsik
|
Brown
| Caccia
| Caplan
| Catterall
|
Cauchon
| Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Copps
|
Davies
| Desjarlais
| Dion
| Drouin
|
Earle
| Easter
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Graham
| Harb
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jackson
| Jennings
|
Karygiannis
| Maloney
| Manley
| McGuire
|
McNally
| McWhinney
| Minna
| Mitchell
|
Morrison
| Murray
| Nault
| Nystrom
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Pagtakhan
| Pankiw
| Peric
|
Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
| Proud
|
Proulx
| Redman
| Rock
| Saada
|
Sgro
| Shepherd
| Speller
| St - Julien
|
Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
|
Ur
| Valeri
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 68
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 266 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 269. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3735
(The House divided on Motion No. 269, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne
– 22
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Beaumier
| Bellemare
| Borotsik
| Brown
|
Caccia
| Catterall
| Cauchon
| Charbonneau
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Copps
| Davies
| Earle
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Harb
| Harvard
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Iftody
| Jackson
| Longfield
|
Maloney
| Manley
| McGuire
| McNally
|
McWhinney
| Morrison
| Nystrom
| Pankiw
|
Peric
| Pettigrew
| Proctor
| Proulx
|
Rock
| Saada
| Sgro
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
|
Vellacott
– 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 269 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 271. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3740
(The House divided on Motion No. 271, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Cardin
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
|
Borotsik
| Caccia
| Catterall
| Cauchon
|
Charbonneau
| Copps
| Davies
| Desjarlais
|
Dockrill
| Earle
| Easter
| Godfrey
|
Goodale
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harb
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Iftody
| Jones
|
Karygiannis
| Manley
| McGuire
| McNally
|
Morrison
| Normand
| Nystrom
| Pankiw
|
Pettigrew
| Proctor
| Rock
| Saada
|
St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
|
Vellacott
– 41
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 271 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 273. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3745
(The House divided on Motion No. 273, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
|
Borotsik
| Caccia
| Catterall
| Cauchon
|
Charbonneau
| Copps
| Davies
| Desjarlais
|
Dockrill
| Earle
| Goodale
| Guarnieri
|
Harb
| Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Iftody
|
Jones
| Karygiannis
| Manley
| McGuire
|
McNally
| Mitchell
| Morrison
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| Pettigrew
| Proctor
| Rock
|
Saada
| Speller
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vellacott
– 39
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 273 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 275. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3750
(The House divided on Motion No. 275, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
|
Borotsik
| Caccia
| Catterall
| Cauchon
|
Charbonneau
| Copps
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
| Fontana
| Godfrey
|
Goodale
| Guarnieri
| Harb
| Harvard
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jones
| Manley
| Matthews
|
McGuire
| McWhinney
| Morrison
| Nystrom
|
Pankiw
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
|
Richardson
| Rock
| Saada
| Scott
(Skeena)
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Vellacott
– 42
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 275 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 280. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3755
(The House divided on Motion No. 280, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 21
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Bailey
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
|
Borotsik
| Byrne
| Caccia
| Carroll
|
Cauchon
| Copps
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
|
Drouin
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
| Folco
|
Fontana
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
|
Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harb
| Harvard
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jennings
| Jones
| Lincoln
|
Longfield
| Manley
| Matthews
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McWhinney
| Morrison
| Murray
| Nystrom
|
Proctor
| Redman
| Rock
| Scott
(Skeena)
|
Sgro
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Ur
| Vellacott
|
Whelan – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 280 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 283. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 283, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Crête
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp
| Venne
– 20
|
NAYS
Members
Bailey
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Borotsik
|
Byrne
| Caccia
| Cannis
| Carroll
|
Cauchon
| Copps
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Folco
|
Fontana
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
|
Graham
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harb
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jennings
| Jones
|
Leung
| Lincoln
| Longfield
| Manley
|
Matthews
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McWhinney
| Morrison
|
Murray
| Nystrom
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
|
Redman
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Sgro
| Shepherd
|
Stoffer
| Ur
| Vellacott
| Whelan
|
Wilfert – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 283 lost.
3800
The next question is on Motion No. 285. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 285, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 23
|
NAYS
Members
Bailey
| Bellemare
| Borotsik
| Byrne
|
Caccia
| Carroll
| Davies
| Desjarlais
|
Dockrill
| Drouin
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Fontana
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harb
|
Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jones
|
Leung
| Lincoln
| Longfield
| Malhi
|
Manley
| Matthews
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McNally
|
McWhinney
| Morrison
| Murray
| Pillitteri
|
Proctor
| Redman
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Sgro
|
Shepherd
| Stoffer
| Ur
| Vellacott
|
Whelan
| Wilfert – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 285 lost.
3805
The next question is on Motion No. 286. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 286, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 23
|
NAYS
Members
Bailey
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Borotsik
|
Byrne
| Caccia
| Carroll
| Davies
|
Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Folco
| Godfrey
| Goodale
|
Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jones
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Longfield
| Malhi
| Matthews
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McNally
| McWhinney
| Morrison
|
Murray
| Nystrom
| Obhrai
| Pillitteri
|
Proctor
| Redman
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Shepherd
|
Stoffer
| Ur
| Vellacott
| Whelan
|
Wilfert – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 286 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Daniel Turp: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. The
speed at which you are reading out these motions is more akin to
that of an auctioneer or the commentator at a horse race than to
that of a Speaker of the House of Commons.
3810
This being a bill on clarity, it would be necessary for what you
are reading to be clear to all those who are listening.
The Deputy Speaker: It is always the desire of the Chair to
serve the House, for—as hon. members are aware—the Chair is the
servant of the House. We do not, however, wish to waste time
with these motions. This is the third—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
The Deputy Speaker: This is already the third time these motions
have been read to the House. All hon. members also have before
them, or available to them, the Order Paper, in which the
motions are all listed. I always give the motion number as
well. Hon. members can eve read them in both official
languages. I therefore believe that, even at the speed I am
reading, it is possible to understand what is being said.
In my opinion the point of order does not apply.
Mr. Daniel Turp: Mr. Speaker, am I to understand that what you
said was that we are wasting the time of the House with these
amendments and motions? Is that what you said, Mr. Speaker?
The Deputy Speaker: Not at all. Perhaps how I said it in French
is what caused the problem.
[English]
I said that the Speaker does not wish to waste the time of the
Chamber in going slowly in reading when it is the third time
these motions have been read to the House, and members have in
front of them copies in both languages so they can easily follow.
[Translation]
That is why I read a bit quickly, but I did not suggest that the
time of the House is being wasted. It is not up to the Speaker
to suggest such a thing.
Mr. Daniel Turp: For the record, Mr. Speaker, I wish to repeat
that you said we are wasting the time of the House, whereas we
have rights in this House and we are claiming our democratic
rights to debate a bill.
[English]
Mr. Ted McWhinney: Mr. Speaker, I would take as a point
of order that you should exercise your powers to control
tendentious and abusive use of parliamentary procedures. This is
not a point of order.
[Translation]
The Deputy Speaker: The Chair must continue with the voting at
this time.
The next question is on Motion No. 288. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3815
[English]
(The House divided on Motion No. 288, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne
– 22
|
NAYS
Members
Bailey
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Borotsik
|
Byrne
| Caccia
| Carroll
| Davies
|
Desjarlais
| Drouin
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Folco
| Godfrey
| Goodale
|
Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jones
| Lincoln
|
Longfield
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
| Matthews
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McNally
| McWhinney
| Morrison
|
Murray
| Nystrom
| Obhrai
| Proctor
|
Scott
(Skeena)
| Shepherd
| Stoffer
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Vellacott
| Whelan – 43
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 288 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 289. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3820
(The House divided on Motion No. 289, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Venne – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Bailey
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Borotsik
|
Byrne
| Caccia
| Carroll
| Davies
|
Drouin
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Godfrey
| Goodale
| Grose
|
Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hardy
| Harvard
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jennings
| Jones
| Lincoln
|
Longfield
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Malhi
| Matthews
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McNally
| McWhinney
| Morrison
|
Murray
| Nystrom
| Obhrai
| Pankiw
|
Peric
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
| Redman
|
Richardson
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Stoffer
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Vellacott
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 289 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 291. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3825
(The House divided on Motion No. 291, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Bailey
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Borotsik
|
Byrne
| Caccia
| Casey
| Davies
|
Drouin
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Folco
| Godfrey
| Goodale
|
Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jennings
| Jones
|
Lincoln
| Longfield
| Malhi
| Matthews
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McNally
| McWhinney
| Morrison
|
Murray
| Nystrom
| Obhrai
| Peric
|
Pillitteri
| Proctor
| Redman
| Scott
(Skeena)
|
Stoffer
| Ur
| Valeri
| Vellacott
|
Whelan
| Wilfert
– 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 291 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 293. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3830
(The House divided on Motion No. 293, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 21
|
NAYS
Members
Bailey
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Borotsik
|
Byrne
| Caccia
| Carroll
| Casey
|
Davies
| Drouin
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
|
Easter
| Folco
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harb
|
Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jennings
|
Jones
| Lincoln
| Longfield
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Malhi
| Matthews
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McTeague
|
McWhinney
| Morrison
| Murray
| Nystrom
|
Obhrai
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
| Redman
|
Richardson
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Stoffer
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Vellacott
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 293 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Gilles Duceppe: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. In
order to respond to the arguments of the government House
leader, who finds that this voting process is costing the
taxpayers a great deal of money, I have consulted with the other
three opposition parties, and we propose, and request of this
House, unanimous consent for the division to be held during the
regular sitting hours of the House. We are doing so in response
to the demands of the government.
I can state that all opposition parties would be in agreement on
this. If we do not obtain unanimous consent, then the party in
government will bear the responsibility. People will see how
hypocritical they are.
Some hon. members: Hear, hear.
The Deputy Speaker: Order, please. Is there unanimous consent of
the House?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: There is obviously not unanimous consent.
Mr. Gilles Duceppe: Mr. Speaker, I would like you to explain
what you mean by “obviously not”. I do not understand your
comment.
The Deputy Speaker: I heard many nays, so it is obvious that
there is not unanimous consent.
[English]
The next question is on Motion No. 295. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3835
(The House divided on Motion No. 295, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Beaumier
| Bélanger
| Borotsik
| Caccia
|
Casey
| Catterall
| Chan
| Charbonneau
|
Cullen
| Davies
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Drouin
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Easter
| Folco
| Fontana
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Iftody
| Jennings
|
Jones
| Karygiannis
| Knutson
| Malhi
|
Matthews
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McWhinney
| Mitchell
|
Morrison
| Normand
| Nystrom
| Obhrai
|
Pankiw
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
| Redman
|
Richardson
| Shepherd
| St. Denis
| Stoffer
|
Vellacott
| Wilfert – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 295 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 296. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3840
(The House divided on Motion No. 296, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Cardin
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Beaumier
| Bélanger
| Borotsik
| Caccia
|
Casey
| Catterall
| Chan
| Charbonneau
|
Coderre
| Cullen
| Davies
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Easter
| Fontana
| Goodale
| Guarnieri
|
Harb
| Hardy
| Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
|
Ianno
| Iftody
| Jones
| Karygiannis
|
Knutson
| Malhi
| Matthews
| Mitchell
|
Morrison
| Normand
| Nystrom
| Obhrai
|
Pankiw
| Parrish
| Pillitteri
| Proctor
|
Redman
| Richardson
| Saada
| Scott
(Skeena)
|
Sgro
| St. Denis
| Volpe – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 296 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 297. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3845
(The House divided on Motion No. 297, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Brien
|
Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Beaumier
| Borotsik
| Boudria
| Caccia
|
Carroll
| Casey
| Catterall
| Chan
|
Charbonneau
| Coderre
| Comuzzi
| Cullen
|
Davies
| Dhaliwal
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
| Earle
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hardy
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Iftody
| Jones
|
Karygiannis
| Malhi
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| Mitchell
| Morrison
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| Pankiw
| Parrish
| Proctor
|
Saada
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Sgro
| St. Denis
|
Stoffer
| Volpe – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 297 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 298. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3850
(The House divided on Motion No. 298, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bailey
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Borotsik
| Boudria
|
Caccia
| Casey
| Catterall
| Chan
|
Coderre
| Comuzzi
| Cullen
| Davies
|
Desjarlais
| Dhaliwal
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
| Earle
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hardy
| Harvard
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Johnston
| Jones
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Mitchell
| Morrison
| Normand
|
Nystrom
| Pankiw
| Pettigrew
| Proctor
|
Saada
| Scott
(Skeena)
| St. Denis
| Stoffer
|
Volpe – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 298 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 399.
3855
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 399, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bailey
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Borotsik
|
Caccia
| Casey
| Catterall
| Chan
|
Charbonneau
| Coderre
| Comuzzi
| Cullen
|
Davies
| Desjarlais
| Dhaliwal
| Dion
|
Discepola
| Dockrill
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Guarnieri
|
Harb
| Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Johnston
|
Jones
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Mitchell
|
Morrison
| Normand
| Nystrom
| Proctor
|
Saada
| Scott
(Skeena)
| St. Denis
| Volpe – 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 399 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 400. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3900
(The House divided on Motion No. 400, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 19
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Adams
| Assadourian
| Augustine
|
Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Beaumier
|
Borotsik
| Caccia
| Casey
| Catterall
|
Chan
| Charbonneau
| Coderre
| Cullen
|
Davies
| Desjarlais
| Dion
| Discepola
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
| Earle
| Eggleton
|
Gilmour
| Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hart
| Harvard
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Iftody
| Johnston
| Jones
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Meredith
| Morrison
| Normand
|
Pankiw
| Pettigrew
| Rock
| Saada
|
Scott
(Skeena)
| Sgro
| St. Denis
| Stoffer
|
Vellacott
| Volpe – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 400 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 401.
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
3905
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): Before we get to
taking the vote, I remind members again that if the member is not
in the House when the question is put, he or she is not to vote.
(The House divided on Motion No. 401, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 20
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Adams
| Assadourian
| Augustine
|
Axworthy
| Beaumier
| Borotsik
| Boudria
|
Caccia
| Casey
| Catterall
| Chan
|
Charbonneau
| Coderre
| Copps
| Cullen
|
Davies
| Desjarlais
| Dion
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Gilmour
| Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hart
|
Harvard
| Johnston
| Jones
| Manley
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Mayfield
| Meredith
| Mitchell
|
Normand
| Pettigrew
| Rock
| Saada
|
Scott
(Skeena)
| St. Denis
| Stoffer
| Vellacott
|
Volpe – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 401 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Daniel Turp: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.
Certain members on the other side of this House have been caught
in the act of using cell phones. They were trying to surf on
their cell phones.
Could you please remind them that the use of cell phones is not
allowed in the House? I am referring, among others, to the
Minister of Canadian Heritage.
3910
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): Every opportunity that I
get to remind members of the decorum of the House is welcome.
Members know that cellphones are not to be used in the House and
that includes behind the curtains. If people want to use
cellphones, go into the lobbies.
The next question is on Motion No. 402. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3915
(The House divided on Motion No. 402, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Crête
| Debien
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 20
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Adams
| Assadourian
| Axworthy
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Borotsik
| Boudria
|
Caccia
| Casey
| Catterall
| Chan
|
Charbonneau
| Copps
| Desjarlais
| Dion
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Gilmour
| Gouk
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Guarnieri
| Hart
|
Harvard
| Harvey
| Johnston
| Jones
|
Manley
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Mayfield
| Meredith
|
Mitchell
| Normand
| Pettigrew
| Proud
|
Rock
| Saada
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Sgro
|
St. Denis
| Stoffer
| Vellacott
| Volpe – 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 402 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 403. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3920
(The House divided on Motion No. 403, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Adams
| Assadourian
| Axworthy
|
Bakopanos
| Borotsik
| Boudria
| Caccia
|
Casey
| Chan
| Charbonneau
| Copps
|
Davies
| Desjarlais
| Dion
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Guarnieri
| Hart
| Harvard
| Harvey
|
Johnston
| Jones
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Mayfield
|
Meredith
| Mitchell
| Normand
| Pettigrew
|
Proud
| Rock
| Scott
(Skeena)
| St. Denis
|
Stoffer
| Vellacott
| Volpe – 39
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 403 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 404. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 404, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
|
Beaumier
| Borotsik
| Boudria
| Caccia
|
Catterall
| Chan
| Charbonneau
| Copps
|
Cullen
| Davies
| Desjarlais
| Dion
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Guarnieri
| Hart
| Harvard
|
Harvey
| Johnston
| Jones
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| Mayfield
| McGuire
|
Meredith
| Mitchell
| Normand
| Pettigrew
|
Proud
| Rock
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| Vellacott
| Wilfert – 43
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 404 lost.
3925
The next question is on Motion No. 405. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 405, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Adams
| Assadourian
| Axworthy
|
Beaumier
| Borotsik
| Boudria
| Caccia
|
Catterall
| Chan
| Charbonneau
| Coderre
|
Copps
| Cullen
| Davies
| Desjarlais
|
Dion
| Duhamel
| Earle
| Gilmour
|
Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Guarnieri
|
Hart
| Harvard
| Harvey
| Iftody
|
Johnston
| Jones
| Karygiannis
| MacKay
(Pictou – Antigonish – Guysborough)
|
Manley
| Mayfield
| McGuire
| Meredith
|
Mitchell
| Normand
| Pettigrew
| Proud
|
Rock
| Scott
(Skeena)
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
Stoffer
| Vellacott
| Volpe
– 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 405 lost.
3930
The next question is on Motion No. 406. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3935
(The House divided on Motion No. 406, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 23
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Borotsik
|
Bulte
| Carroll
| Copps
| Davies
|
Drouin
| Earle
| Folco
| Gouk
|
Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hart
|
Harvard
| Harvey
| Johnston
| Jones
|
Jordan
| Longfield
| Manley
| Matthews
|
Mayfield
| McTeague
| McWhinney
| Meredith
|
Murray
| Parrish
| Peric
| Pettigrew
|
Pillitteri
| Richardson
| Rock
| Scott
(Skeena)
|
Stoffer
| Ur
| Valeri
| Vellacott
|
Whelan – 41
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 406 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 407. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 407, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne
– 22
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Borotsik
|
Bulte
| Carroll
| Cauchon
| Copps
|
Davies
| Drouin
| Earle
| Gouk
|
Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hart
|
Harvard
| Harvey
| Johnston
| Jordan
|
Longfield
| Malhi
| Manley
| Matthews
|
Mayfield
| McTeague
| McWhinney
| Meredith
|
Murray
| Parrish
| Pettigrew
| Rock
|
Stoffer
| Ur
| Valeri
| Vellacott
|
Whelan – 37
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 407 lost.
3940
The next question is on Motion No. 408. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 408, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
|
Dumas
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guimond
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Borotsik
| Bulte
| Caccia
| Carroll
|
Cauchon
| Copps
| Davies
| Earle
|
Easter
| Gouk
| Grose
| Guarnieri
|
Harb
| Hardy
| Hart
| Harvard
|
Harvey
| Johnston
| Jordan
| Lincoln
|
Longfield
| Malhi
| Manley
| Matthews
|
Mayfield
| McTeague
| McWhinney
| Meredith
|
Murray
| Parrish
| Peric
| Pillitteri
|
Redman
| Richardson
| Rock
| Stoffer
|
Ur
| Valeri
| Vellacott
| Whelan – 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 408 lost.
The next question is Motion No. 409. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3945
(The House divided on Motion No. 409, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Crête
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Dumas
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guimond
|
Marchand
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne
– 22
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Borotsik
| Caccia
| Carroll
| Cauchon
|
Copps
| Davies
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
|
Easter
| Folco
| Gilmour
| Gouk
|
Grose
| Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hardy
|
Hart
| Harvard
| Harvey
| Johnston
|
Lincoln
| Longfield
| MacAulay
| Malhi
|
Manley
| Matthews
| Mayfield
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McWhinney
| Meredith
| Murray
| Parrish
|
Peric
| Pillitteri
| Redman
| Rock
|
Steckle
| Ur
| Valeri
| Whelan
– 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 409 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 410. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
3950
(The House divided on Motion No. 410, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Canuel
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dumas
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Marchand
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 20
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Borotsik
|
Bulte
| Caccia
| Carroll
| Cauchon
|
Copps
| Davies
| Drouin
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
|
Earle
| Easter
| Folco
| Gilmour
|
Gouk
| Grose
| Hardy
| Hart
|
Harvard
| Harvey
| Jennings
| Johnston
|
Lincoln
| Longfield
| Malhi
| Manley
|
Matthews
| Mayfield
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McTeague
|
McWhinney
| Meredith
| Murray
| Parrish
|
Peric
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Redman
|
Rock
| Steckle
| Ur
| Valeri
|
Whelan – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 410 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 150.
3955
(The House divided on Motion No. 150, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Canuel
| Crête
| Debien
|
Dumas
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 21
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Borotsik
|
Bulte
| Caccia
| Carroll
| Cauchon
|
Copps
| Davies
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
|
Easter
| Gilmour
| Gouk
| Grose
|
Harb
| Hardy
| Hart
| Harvard
|
Harvey
| Jennings
| Johnston
| Lincoln
|
Longfield
| Malhi
| Manley
| Matthews
|
Mayfield
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McTeague
| McWhinney
|
Meredith
| Murray
| Parrish
| Peric
|
Pettigrew
| Redman
| Rock
| Steckle
|
Stoffer
| Ur
| Valeri
| Whelan – 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 150 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 151. An affirmative vote on
Motion No. 151 obviates the necessity of the question being put
on Motions Nos. 152 to 169, 172, 174, 176 to 178, 180, 181, 183,
185, 186, 188 to 190, 192, 194 to 197, 200, 202, 203, 205 to 210,
212 to 214, 216 to 218, 220, 221, 223, 226, 228, 230, 232, 233,
236, 239, 241 to 265, 267, 268, 270, 272, 274, 276 to 278, 281,
282, 284, 287, 290, 292, 294, 299 to 397.
On the other hand, a negative vote on Motion No. 151
necessitates the question being put on Motions Nos. 152 to 169,
172, 174, 176 to 178, 180, 181, 183, 185, 186, 188 to 190, 192,
194 to 197, 200, 202, 203, 205 to 210, 212 to 214, 216 to 218,
220, 221, 223, 226, 228, 230, 232, 233, 236, 239, 241 to 265,
267, 268, 270, 272, 274, 276 to 278, 281, 282, 284, 287, 290,
292, 294, 299 to 397, provided that the adoption of any one of
these motions will obviate the necessity of the question being
put on the remaining motions in this series.
4000
An affirmative vote on this motion obviates the necessity of the
question being put on all the motions. On the other hand, a
negative vote on this motion necessitates the question being put
on all those motions.
The next question is on Motion No. 151. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 151, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bigras
|
Canuel
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Dumas
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Lebel
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Perron
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Borotsik
| Caccia
| Carroll
| Cauchon
|
Copps
| Davies
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
|
Easter
| Gilmour
| Gouk
| Grose
|
Harb
| Hardy
| Hart
| Harvard
|
Harvey
| Jennings
| Johnston
| Lincoln
|
Longfield
| Malhi
| Manley
| Matthews
|
Mayfield
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McTeague
| McWhinney
|
Meredith
| Murray
| Parrish
| Pettigrew
|
Redman
| Stoffer
| Ur
| Valeri
|
Whelan – 41
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 151 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 152. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4005
(The House divided on Motion No. 152, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Lalonde
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Borotsik
| Bulte
| Caccia
|
Carroll
| Cauchon
| Copps
| Davies
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
| Easter
| Folco
|
Gilmour
| Gouk
| Grose
| Harb
|
Hardy
| Hart
| Harvey
| Jennings
|
Johnston
| Lincoln
| Longfield
| Malhi
|
Manley
| Matthews
| Mayfield
| McTeague
|
McWhinney
| Meredith
| Murray
| Parrish
|
Ur
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 39
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 152 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 153. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4010
(The House divided on Motion No. 153, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Borotsik
| Bulte
| Caccia
|
Carroll
| Cauchon
| Copps
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
|
Earle
| Easter
| Folco
| Gallaway
|
Gilmour
| Gouk
| Grose
| Harb
|
Hardy
| Hart
| Harvey
| Jennings
|
Johnston
| Lincoln
| Longfield
| Malhi
|
Manley
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| Mayfield
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McTeague
| McWhinney
| Meredith
|
Murray
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Parrish
|
Pettigrew
| Redman
| Steckle
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 153 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 154. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4015
(The House divided on Motion No. 154, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Dumas
| Fournier
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Perron
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Borotsik
| Bulte
| Caccia
| Cauchon
|
Copps
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
| Easter
|
Gallaway
| Grose
| Hardy
| Hart
|
Harvard
| Jennings
| Johnston
| Lincoln
|
Longfield
| Malhi
| Manley
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Matthews
| Mayfield
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McTeague
|
McWhinney
| Meredith
| Murray
| Nystrom
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Parrish
| Peric
| Redman
|
Rock
| Steckle
| Stoffer
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 154 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 155. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4020
(The House divided on Motion No. 155, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Dumas
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
|
Bulte
| Caccia
| Carroll
| Cauchon
|
Dockrill
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
| Easter
|
Gallaway
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grose
| Hardy
|
Hart
| Harvard
| Harvey
| Jennings
|
Johnston
| Lincoln
| Longfield
| Malhi
|
Manley
| Matthews
| Mayfield
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McWhinney
| Meredith
| Murray
|
Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Parrish
| Peric
|
Pettigrew
| Redman
| Rock
| Steckle
|
Ur
| Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
|
Wilfert
– 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 155 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 156. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4025
(The House divided on Motion No. 156, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Bélanger
| Borotsik
| Bulte
|
Caccia
| Carroll
| Cauchon
| Dockrill
|
Earle
| Easter
| Gallaway
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grose
| Gruending
| Hart
|
Jennings
| Johnston
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
Malhi
| Manley
| Matthews
| Mayfield
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McWhinney
| Meredith
|
Murray
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Parrish
| Pettigrew
|
Redman
| Rock
| Steckle
| Stoffer
|
Ur
| Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan – 40
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 156 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 157. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 157, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bélanger
|
Borotsik
| Bulte
| Caccia
| Carroll
|
Cauchon
| Dockrill
| Earle
| Easter
|
Gallaway
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Grose
| Gruending
| Hart
|
Jennings
| Johnston
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
Malhi
| Manley
| Mayfield
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Meredith
| Murray
| Nystrom
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Parrish
| Redman
| Rock
|
Steckle
| Stoffer
| Ur
| Valeri
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan – 42
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 157 lost.
4030
The next question is on Motion No. 158. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 158, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Dumas
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Venne
– 20
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bakopanos
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Borotsik
| Caccia
| Cannis
|
Catterall
| Cauchon
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Dion
| Discepola
| Dockrill
| Earle
|
Easter
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Grose
|
Gruending
| Hart
| Iftody
| Johnston
|
Laliberte
| Lincoln
| Malhi
| Manley
|
Mayfield
| McGuire
| McWhinney
| Meredith
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
Parrish
| Proud
| Rock
| Saada – 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 158 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 159.
4035
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 159, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Borotsik
| Caccia
| Cannis
| Catterall
|
Cauchon
| Chan
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Dion
| Discepola
| Dockrill
| Earle
|
Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gouk
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Hart
|
Ianno
| Iftody
| Johnston
| Knutson
|
Laliberte
| MacAulay
| Manley
| Mayfield
|
McGuire
| Meredith
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
|
Nystrom
| Paradis
| Pettigrew
| Proud
|
Rock
| Saada
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
Wasylycia - Leis
– 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 159 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 160. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4040
(The House divided on Motion No. 160, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Beaumier
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Borotsik
| Caccia
| Cannis
|
Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chan
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Dion
| Discepola
| Dockrill
|
Earle
| Folco
| Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Hart
|
Iftody
| Johnston
| Knutson
| Laliberte
|
MacAulay
| Mayfield
| McGuire
| Meredith
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
| Nystrom
| Paradis
|
Proctor
| Proud
| Rock
| Saada
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| Steckle – 43
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 160 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 161. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4045
(The House divided on Motion No. 161, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bakopanos
|
Beaumier
| Bélanger
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Borotsik
|
Boudria
| Caccia
| Cannis
| Catterall
|
Cauchon
| Chan
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Dion
| Discepola
| Dockrill
| Earle
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Gruending
| Hart
| Iftody
| Johnston
|
MacAulay
| Mayfield
| McGuire
| Meredith
|
Mitchell
| Nystrom
| Paradis
| Peric
|
Proctor
| Proud
| Rock
| Saada
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Wilfert – 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 161 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 162. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 162, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bakopanos
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Borotsik
| Boudria
| Caccia
|
Cannis
| Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chan
|
Coderre
| Collenette
| Dion
| Discepola
|
Dockrill
| Earle
| Folco
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
|
Hart
| Iftody
| Johnston
| Knutson
|
Laliberte
| MacAulay
| Matthews
| Mayfield
|
McGuire
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McWhinney
| Meredith
|
Mitchell
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Paradis
|
Peric
| Proud
| Rock
| Saada
|
Speller
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Wilfert
– 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 162 lost.
4050
The next question is on Motion No. 163. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 163, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bakopanos
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Borotsik
| Boudria
| Caccia
| Cannis
|
Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
| Dockrill
|
Dromisky
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
| Gagliano
|
Gilmour
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Harb
| Harvey
|
Iftody
| Johnston
| Karygiannis
| Knutson
|
Laliberte
| Leung
| MacAulay
| Matthews
|
Mayfield
| McGuire
| McWhinney
| Meredith
|
Mitchell
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| O'Reilly
|
Paradis
| Proud
| Redman
| Rock
|
Saada
| Speller
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Wilfert
– 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 163 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Réal Ménard: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I seek
unanimous consent to offer my congratulations to the
Bouchard government on the Landry budget, which has lowered
taxes by $2 billion over a four year period.
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): Does the hon. member
for Hochelaga—Maisonneuve have the unanimous consent of the
House?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): The next question is
on Motion No. 164.
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
4055
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 164, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
| St - Hilaire
|
Venne – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bakopanos
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Borotsik
| Boudria
| Caccia
| Cannis
|
Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Dromisky
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
|
Gilmour
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Harb
| Hart
|
Harvey
| Iftody
| Johnston
| Karygiannis
|
Knutson
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
| Mancini
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
| McGuire
|
Meredith
| Mitchell
| Nystrom
| Paradis
|
Peterson
| Proud
| Rock
| Shepherd
|
St. Denis
| Stewart
(Northumberland) – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 164 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 165. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4100
(The House divided on Motion No. 165, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Bakopanos
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Borotsik
| Boudria
| Caccia
| Cannis
|
Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Dromisky
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
| Gagliano
|
Gilmour
| Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Gruending
| Harb
| Hardy
| Hart
|
Harvey
| Iftody
| Johnston
| Karygiannis
|
Knutson
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
| Mancini
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
| McGuire
|
Meredith
| Mitchell
| Nystrom
| Paradis
|
Peterson
| Proud
| Rock
| Shepherd
|
St. Denis
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
– 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 165 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 166. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4105
(The House divided on Motion No. 166, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Augustine
| Bakopanos
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Blaikie
| Boudria
| Caccia
| Cannis
|
Catterall
| Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
|
Copps
| Desjarlais
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Dromisky
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Gilmour
| Gouk
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Harb
|
Hardy
| Hart
| Harvard
| Harvey
|
Johnston
| Karygiannis
| Knutson
| Laliberte
|
MacAulay
| Mahoney
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
| McGuire
|
Meredith
| Mitchell
| Nystrom
| Paradis
|
Peterson
| Proud
| Rock
| Shepherd
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Northumberland) – 55
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 166 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 167. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour of the
motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4110
(The House divided on Motion No. 167, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
|
St - Hilaire
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Augustine
| Bakopanos
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Boudria
| Cannis
| Catterall
| Chan
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
| Copps
| Desjarlais
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
|
Duhamel
| Earle
| Gagliano
| Gallaway
|
Gilmour
| Godfrey
| Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Harb
| Hart
|
Harvey
| Johnston
| Karygiannis
| Laliberte
|
MacAulay
| Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
| McGuire
| Meredith
|
Mitchell
| Nystrom
| Paradis
| Peterson
|
Proud
| Rock
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
Stewart
(Northumberland) – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 167 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 168. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4115
(The House divided on Motion No. 168, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Augustine
| Bakopanos
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Boudria
| Cannis
| Catterall
| Cauchon
|
Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
|
Duhamel
| Earle
| Gagliano
| Gilmour
|
Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
|
Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hart
| Harvey
|
Johnston
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
|
McGuire
| Meredith
| Mitchell
| Paradis
|
Peterson
| Proud
| Rock
| Saada
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Northumberland) – 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 168 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 169. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 169, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Augustine
| Bakopanos
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Cannis
| Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chan
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
| Copps
| Desjarlais
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
|
Duhamel
| Earle
| Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
|
Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hart
| Harvey
|
Johnston
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
|
McGuire
| Meredith
| Paradis
| Peterson
|
Pillitteri
| Proud
| Rock
| Saada
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
|
Wappel
– 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 169 lost.
4120
The next question is on Motion No. 172. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 172, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
|
Laurin
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Augustine
| Bakopanos
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Boudria
| Cannis
| Cauchon
| Chan
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Coderre
| Copps
| Desjarlais
|
Dion
| Discepola
| Dockrill
| Dromisky
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
| Earle
| Gagliano
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Guarnieri
| Harb
|
Hart
| Harvey
| Johnston
| Manley
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
| McGuire
|
Meredith
| Mitchell
| Nystrom
| O'Reilly
|
Paradis
| Peterson
| Pillitteri
| Proud
|
Rock
| Saada
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
– 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 172 lost.
4125
The next question is on Motion No. 174. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 174, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
|
Venne – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Boudria
| Cannis
| Cauchon
|
Chan
| Coderre
| Copps
| Desjarlais
|
Dion
| Dromisky
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Folco
| Gilmour
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Gouk
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Gruending
| Guarnieri
| Harb
| Hart
|
Harvey
| Johnston
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
| McDonough
| Meredith
|
Mitchell
| Nystrom
| O'Reilly
| Paradis
|
Peterson
| Proud
| Rock
| Saada
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Wappel
|
Wasylycia - Leis – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 174 lost.
4130
The next question is on Motion No. 176. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 176, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Brison
|
Caccia
| Cannis
| Catterall
| Cauchon
|
Copps
| Desjarlais
| Dion
| Discepola
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
| Earle
| Gagliano
|
Gilmour
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Gouk
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Harb
|
Hart
| Harvey
| Johnston
| Laliberte
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| Meredith
|
Mitchell
| Nault
| Nystrom
| O'Reilly
|
Paradis
| Peric
| Peterson
| Pillitteri
|
Proud
| Redman
| Rock
| Saada
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
|
Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wilfert – 56
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 176 lost.
4135
The next question is on Motion No. 177. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4140
(The House divided on Motion No. 177, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
|
Blaikie
| Brison
| Bulte
| Caccia
|
Carroll
| Cauchon
| Desjarlais
| Dion
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
| Easter
| Folco
|
Gagliano
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
|
Harb
| Hart
| Harvey
| Johnston
|
Leung
| Lincoln
| Longfield
| Mahoney
|
Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Matthews
|
McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Meredith
| Murray
|
Nault
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| O'Reilly
|
Parrish
| Peric
| Peterson
| Pillitteri
|
Redman
| Rock
| Shepherd
| Steckle
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Ur
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan
| Wilfert – 58
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 177 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 178. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4145
(The House divided on Motion No. 178, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| St - Hilaire
|
Venne
– 25
|
NAYS
Members
Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Blaikie
|
Brison
| Bulte
| Caccia
| Carroll
|
Cauchon
| Copps
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
|
Easter
| Folco
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Gruending
| Harb
| Hart
| Harvey
|
Jennings
| Johnston
| Laliberte
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Longfield
| Mahoney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Matthews
| McDonough
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
Meredith
| Murray
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
O'Reilly
| Parrish
| Peric
| Pillitteri
|
Redman
| Rock
| Shepherd
| Steckle
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan – 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 178 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 180. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 180, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Duceppe
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Lebel
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bailey
|
Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Bulte
| Caccia
| Cauchon
| Desjarlais
|
Earle
| Easter
| Folco
| Gallaway
|
Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Harb
| Hart
|
Harvey
| Jennings
| Johnston
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Longfield
| Mahoney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Matthews
| McDonough
|
Meredith
| Murray
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
O'Reilly
| Parrish
| Peric
| Pratt
|
Redman
| Shepherd
| St - Jacques
| Steckle
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Thompson
(New Brunswick Southwest)
| Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan
| Wilfert – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 180 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 181.
4150
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 181, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Duceppe
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Lebel
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bailey
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bulte
| Caccia
| Carroll
| Desjarlais
|
Dockrill
| Earle
| Easter
| Folco
|
Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Gruending
| Harb
| Hart
|
Harvey
| Jennings
| Johnston
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Longfield
| Mahoney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Matthews
| McDonough
| McTeague
|
Meredith
| Murray
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
O'Reilly
| Parrish
| Pillitteri
| Pratt
|
Provenzano
| Redman
| Shepherd
| St - Jacques
|
Steckle
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wilfert – 55
|
PAIRED
Members
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 181 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 183. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4155
(The House divided on Motion No. 183, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Lalonde
| Lebel
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bailey
|
Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bulte
|
Carroll
| Cauchon
| Desjarlais
| Earle
|
Easter
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Goodale
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Gruending
| Harb
| Hart
|
Jennings
| Johnston
| Leung
| Lincoln
|
Longfield
| Mahoney
| Mancini
| Manley
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Matthews
| Mayfield
| Meredith
|
Murray
| Nystrom
| O'Reilly
| Parrish
|
Pillitteri
| Pratt
| Provenzano
| Redman
|
Sgro
| Shepherd
| St - Jacques
| Steckle
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
|
White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wilfert – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 183 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 185. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4200
(The House divided on Motion No. 185, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Lalonde
| Loubier
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| St - Hilaire
|
Venne – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bulte
| Carroll
|
Cauchon
| Desjarlais
| Earle
| Easter
|
Folco
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
| Goodale
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Gruending
| Harb
| Jennings
|
Johnston
| Leung
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
Mahoney
| Mancini
| Manley
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
Matthews
| McTeague
| McWhinney
| Meredith
|
Murray
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| O'Reilly
|
Parrish
| Pillitteri
| Pratt
| Provenzano
|
Redman
| Rock
| Sgro
| Shepherd
|
St - Jacques
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 185 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 186. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4205
(The House divided on Motion No. 186, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Lalonde
| Loubier
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 19
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bulte
| Carroll
|
Cauchon
| Desjarlais
| Dromisky
| Earle
|
Easter
| Folco
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
|
Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Gruending
| Harb
|
Jennings
| Johnston
| Karetak - Lindell
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Longfield
| Mahoney
| Mancini
|
Manley
| Matthews
| Mayfield
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McTeague
| McWhinney
| Meredith
| Murray
|
Nystrom
| Parrish
| Provenzano
| Redman
|
Rock
| Sgro
| Shepherd
| St - Jacques
|
Steckle
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Ur
| Valeri
|
Wappel
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 186 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 188. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 188, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Dumas
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Ménard
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Venne – 17
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Boudria
| Bulte
| Caccia
|
Carroll
| Cauchon
| Desjarlais
| Earle
|
Easter
| Folco
| Gallaway
| Godfrey
|
Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Gruending
| Harb
|
Jennings
| Johnston
| Karetak - Lindell
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Longfield
| Mahoney
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Matthews
| Mayfield
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McTeague
|
McWhinney
| Meredith
| Murray
| Myers
|
Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Parrish
| Pillitteri
|
Provenzano
| Redman
| Sgro
| Shepherd
|
St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Ur
| Valeri
|
Wappel
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 188 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 189.
4210
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 189, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Canuel
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bulte
| Caccia
| Carroll
|
Cauchon
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Easter
|
Folco
| Godfrey
| Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Gruending
| Harvey
| Jennings
| Johnston
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Laliberte
| Leung
| Lincoln
|
Longfield
| Mahoney
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
|
Mayfield
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McTeague
| McWhinney
|
Murray
| Myers
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
Pillitteri
| Provenzano
| Redman
| Sgro
|
Shepherd
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 189 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 190. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4215
(The House divided on Motion No. 190, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Canuel
| de Savoye
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Picard
(Drummond) – 13
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bulte
| Caccia
| Carroll
|
Cauchon
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Easter
|
Folco
| Godfrey
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Gruending
|
Harvey
| Jennings
| Johnston
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kraft Sloan
| Leung
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
Mahoney
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| Mayfield
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McTeague
| McWhinney
| Murray
|
Myers
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Provenzano
|
Redman
| Robillard
| Sgro
| Shepherd
|
St - Jacques
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Whelan – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 190 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 192. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4220
(The House divided on Motion No. 192, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Canuel
| Debien
|
Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Dumas
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
St - Hilaire
| Venne – 18
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bulte
| Caccia
| Cauchon
|
Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Easter
|
Folco
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Harvey
| Jennings
|
Johnston
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Mahoney
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
|
Mayfield
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McTeague
| McWhinney
|
Meredith
| Murray
| Myers
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
Pillitteri
| Provenzano
| Redman
| Robillard
|
Sgro
| Shepherd
| St - Jacques
| Steckle
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Ur
| Valeri
| Whelan
|
Wilfert – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 192 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 194. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 194, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Canuel
| Debien
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Venne – 19
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bulte
| Caccia
| Carroll
|
Cauchon
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
|
Easter
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Johnston
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kraft Sloan
| Leung
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
Mahoney
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Matthews
| Mayfield
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McTeague
| McWhinney
| Meredith
|
Murray
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| O'Reilly
| Peric
|
Pillitteri
| Provenzano
| Redman
| Robillard
|
Sgro
| Shepherd
| St - Jacques
| Steckle
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Szabo
| Ur
| Valeri
|
Whelan
| Wilfert – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 194 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 195. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4225
(The House divided on Motion No. 195, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
| de Savoye
|
Debien
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Girard - Bujold
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne
– 20
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Brison
|
Bulte
| Caccia
| Collenette
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
|
Easter
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Harb
| Johnston
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Laliberte
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
Mahoney
| Matthews
| Mayfield
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McTeague
| McWhinney
| Meredith
| Murray
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Peric
| Pillitteri
| Redman
|
Robillard
| Sgro
| Shepherd
| Steckle
|
Szabo
| Ur
| Valeri
| Whelan
|
Wilfert – 37
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 195 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 196. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4230
(The House divided on Motion No. 196, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
|
de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Girard - Bujold
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Venne – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bélanger
|
Brison
| Caccia
| Cauchon
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Easter
|
Harb
| Johnston
| Karetak - Lindell
| Longfield
|
Mahoney
| Matthews
| Mayfield
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McWhinney
| Meredith
| Mitchell
| Murray
|
Myers
| Peric
| Pillitteri
| Proud
|
Provenzano
| Redman
| Robillard
| Sgro
|
Shepherd
| Steckle
| Szabo
| Ur
|
Valeri
| Whelan
| Wilfert – 39
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 196 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 197. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4235
(The House divided on Motion No. 197, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Dumas
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guay
| Lalonde
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Rocheleau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Venne – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Axworthy
| Beaumier
| Bonin
|
Boudria
| Brison
| Caccia
| Carroll
|
Cauchon
| Chamberlain
| Chan
| Charbonneau
|
Coderre
| Collenette
| Discepola
| Dromisky
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
| Gouk
| Gruending
|
Harb
| Iftody
| Johnston
| Mancini
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
| McGuire
| Meredith
|
Mitchell
| Nault
| Paradis
| Pratt
|
Proud
| Provenzano
| Redman
| Robillard
|
Saada
| Sgro
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
Szabo
| Torsney
– 42
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 197 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 200. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 200, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
|
Dumas
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Perron
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Bailey
| Beaumier
| Bonin
|
Bonwick
| Boudria
| Brison
| Caccia
|
Chamberlain
| Chan
| Charbonneau
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Discepola
| Dromisky
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
|
Duhamel
| Gilmour
| Gouk
| Gruending
|
Harb
| Iftody
| Johnston
| Laliberte
|
Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
| McGuire
|
Meredith
| Mitchell
| Nault
| Paradis
|
Pratt
| Proud
| Robillard
| Saada
|
Solomon
| Speller
| St. Denis
| Torsney – 40
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 200 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 202. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4240
(The House divided on Motion No. 202, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Bailey
| Beaumier
| Bonin
|
Boudria
| Brison
| Cauchon
| Chamberlain
|
Chan
| Charbonneau
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Discepola
| Dromisky
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Gilmour
| Gouk
| Gruending
|
Harb
| Hart
| Iftody
| Johnston
|
Laliberte
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
|
McGuire
| Meredith
| Mitchell
| Nault
|
Nystrom
| Paradis
| Proud
| Robillard
|
Saada
| Schmidt
| Solomon
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 43
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 202 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 203. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4245
(The House divided on Motion No. 203, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Lalonde
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Rocheleau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Beaumier
| Bonin
| Bonwick
| Boudria
|
Brison
| Caccia
| Chamberlain
| Chan
|
Charbonneau
| Coderre
| Collenette
| Discepola
|
Dromisky
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Gilmour
| Goodale
| Gouk
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Gruending
| Harb
| Hart
| Iftody
|
Jennings
| Johnston
| Laliberte
| Mancini
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
| McGuire
| Meredith
|
Mitchell
| Myers
| Nault
| Nystrom
|
Paradis
| Proud
| Robillard
| Saada
|
Schmidt
| Solomon
| Speller
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 203 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 205. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 205, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Lalonde
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
| Bellemare
|
Bonin
| Bonwick
| Boudria
| Brison
|
Caccia
| Chamberlain
| Chan
| Charbonneau
|
Collenette
| Discepola
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Goodale
| Gouk
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Gruending
| Harb
| Hart
| Iftody
|
Jennings
| Laliberte
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
Mayfield
| McGuire
| Meredith
| Mitchell
|
Nault
| Nystrom
| Paradis
| Robillard
|
Saada
| Schmidt
| Solomon
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 43
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 205 lost.
4250
The next question is on Motion No. 206. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 206, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Lalonde
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne
– 27
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Bonin
| Bonwick
| Brison
| Caccia
|
Cadman
| Catterall
| Chamberlain
| Chan
|
Collenette
| Discepola
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Goodale
| Gouk
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Gruending
| Harb
| Hart
| Iftody
|
Jennings
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
|
McGuire
| Meredith
| Mitchell
| Nault
|
Nystrom
| Paradis
| Proud
| Robillard
|
Saada
| Schmidt
| Solomon
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 43
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 206 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 207. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4255
(The House divided on Motion No. 207, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Lalonde
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Perron
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bailey
| Bakopanos
|
Bonin
| Bonwick
| Caccia
| Catterall
|
Chamberlain
| Chan
| Collenette
| Discepola
|
Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Earle
| Folco
|
Fontana
| Goodale
| Gouk
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Gruending
| Harb
| Hart
| Iftody
|
Jennings
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
| Mancini
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
| McGuire
| Meredith
|
Mitchell
| Nault
| Nystrom
| Paradis
|
Peric
| Phinney
| Proud
| Provenzano
|
Robillard
| Saada
| Schmidt
| Solomon
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 207 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 208. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4300
(The House divided on Motion No. 208, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| St - Hilaire
|
Venne – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Ablonczy
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bailey
|
Bakopanos
| Benoit
| Bonin
| Caccia
|
Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chamberlain
| Chan
|
Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
| Dockrill
|
Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Earle
| Goodale
|
Gouk
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Harb
|
Hart
| Harvey
| Iftody
| Laliberte
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
| Meredith
| Mitchell
|
Nystrom
| Paradis
| Peterson
| Phinney
|
Robillard
| Schmidt
| Solomon
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis – 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 208 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 209. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 209, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Duceppe
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bakopanos
| Benoit
|
Bertrand
| Bonin
| Caccia
| Catterall
|
Cauchon
| Chamberlain
| Chan
| Collenette
|
Desjarlais
| Discepola
| Dockrill
| Dromisky
|
Duhamel
| Earle
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Harb
|
Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Iftody
| Karygiannis
|
Laliberte
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mayfield
| Mitchell
|
Nault
| Nystrom
| Paradis
| Peterson
|
Phinney
| Robillard
| Solomon
| St. Denis
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis – 39
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 209 lost.
4305
The next question is on Motion No. 210. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 210, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
|
Debien
| Desrochers
| Duceppe
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Rocheleau
|
St - Hilaire
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Benoit
|
Bertrand
| Bonin
| Boudria
| Caccia
|
Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chamberlain
| Chan
|
Charbonneau
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
|
Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Fontana
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Hanger
|
Harb
| Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Iftody
|
Karygiannis
| Laliberte
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Mitchell
| Nystrom
| Paradis
| Peric
|
Peterson
| Phinney
| Robillard
| Solomon
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Wasylycia - Leis
– 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 210 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 212. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4310
(The House divided on Motion No. 212, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Duceppe
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bakopanos
|
Benoit
| Bertrand
| Bonin
| Boudria
|
Caccia
| Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chan
|
Charbonneau
| Coderre
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
|
Discepola
| Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Gruending
| Harb
|
Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Iftody
| Karygiannis
|
Laliberte
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Matthews
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Mitchell
| Nystrom
| Paradis
|
Phinney
| Pratt
| Provenzano
| Robillard
|
Solomon
| St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Wasylycia - Leis
– 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 212 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 213. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 213, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Duceppe
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bakopanos
|
Bellemare
| Benoit
| Bertrand
| Bonin
|
Boudria
| Bryden
| Caccia
| Cadman
|
Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chan
| Charbonneau
|
Coderre
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
|
Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Harb
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Iftody
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Karygiannis
| Laliberte
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McWhinney
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Mitchell
| Nystrom
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Paradis
| Phinney
| Pratt
|
Provenzano
| Robillard
| Solomon
| St. Denis
|
St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Wasylycia - Leis
– 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 213 lost.
4315
The next question is on Motion No. 214. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 214, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bakopanos
|
Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Benoit
| Bertrand
|
Blaikie
| Bonin
| Boudria
| Bryden
|
Caccia
| Cadman
| Catterall
| Cauchon
|
Chan
| Charbonneau
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Fontana
| Harb
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Iftody
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Laliberte
|
Longfield
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Matthews
|
McWhinney
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Mitchell
| Nystrom
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Paradis
| Phinney
| Provenzano
|
Robillard
| Solomon
| St. Denis
| St - Jacques
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Wasylycia - Leis – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 214 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 216. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4320
(The House divided on Motion No. 216, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bakopanos
|
Bellemare
| Benoit
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Boudria
| Bryden
| Caccia
|
Cadman
| Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chamberlain
|
Charbonneau
| Coderre
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
|
Discepola
| Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Fontana
| Goodale
| Harb
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Iftody
| Karygiannis
| Laliberte
|
Mancini
| McWhinney
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Mitchell
|
Nault
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Paradis
|
Peterson
| Phinney
| Provenzano
| Robillard
|
Solomon
| Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Jacques
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Wasylycia - Leis
– 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 216 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 217. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4325
(The House divided on Motion No. 217, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Desrochers
| Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Augustine
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bakopanos
|
Benoit
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
| Boudria
|
Bryden
| Caccia
| Cadman
| Catterall
|
Cauchon
| Chamberlain
| Charbonneau
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Copps
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
|
Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Fontana
| Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Guarnieri
|
Harb
| Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Iftody
|
Karygiannis
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Mitchell
| Nault
| Nystrom
| Paradis
|
Peterson
| Phinney
| Robillard
| Solomon
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis
– 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 217 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 218. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4330
(The House divided on Motion No. 218, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bakopanos
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Benoit
|
Blaikie
| Bonin
| Boudria
| Bryden
|
Cadman
| Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chamberlain
|
Charbonneau
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
|
Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Fontana
| Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Guarnieri
|
Harb
| Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Iftody
|
Karygiannis
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Mancini
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McTeague
| McWhinney
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Mitchell
| Murray
| Nault
| Nystrom
|
Paradis
| Peterson
| Phinney
| Robillard
|
Solomon
| Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Jacques
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Torsney – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 218 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 220. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4335
(The House divided on Motion No. 220, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Marchand
| Mercier
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Bélanger
| Benoit
| Blaikie
| Bonwick
|
Byrne
| Cauchon
| Collenette
| Copps
|
Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Earle
| Folco
|
Fontana
| Godfrey
| Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Harb
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Limoges
| Longfield
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
Matthews
| McTeague
| McWhinney
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Murray
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Parrish
|
Patry
| Pillitteri
| Pratt
| Provenzano
|
Robillard
| Sgro
| Solomon
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Szabo
| Whelan – 42
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 220 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 221. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4340
(The House divided on Motion No. 221, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Debien
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bélanger
| Benoit
|
Blaikie
| Bonwick
| Brison
| Byrne
|
Cauchon
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
|
Earle
| Folco
| Fontana
| Godfrey
|
Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Guarnieri
| Harb
|
Harvey
| Laliberte
| Longfield
| Mancini
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Matthews
| McTeague
| McWhinney
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Murray
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
Parrish
| Patry
| Pillitteri
| Pratt
|
Provenzano
| Robillard
| Sgro
| Solomon
|
St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Szabo
| Valeri
|
Whelan – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 221 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 223. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 223, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Debien
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
– 26
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bélanger
|
Benoit
| Blaikie
| Bonwick
| Brison
|
Byrne
| Cauchon
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
|
Dockrill
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Earle
| Folco
|
Fontana
| Godfrey
| Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Harb
| Harvey
| Herron
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Longfield
| Mancini
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Matthews
| McTeague
| McWhinney
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Murray
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Parrish
|
Patry
| Peric
| Pillitteri
| Pratt
|
Provenzano
| Robillard
| Solomon
| St - Jacques
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Szabo
| Telegdi
| Valeri
|
Whelan – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 223 lost.
4345
The next question is on Motion No. 226. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 226, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marchand
|
Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bélanger
|
Benoit
| Blaikie
| Bonwick
| Byrne
|
Cauchon
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
|
Earle
| Folco
| Fontana
| Godfrey
|
Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Guarnieri
| Harb
|
Harvey
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Limoges
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McTeague
|
McWhinney
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Murray
| Nystrom
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Parrish
| Patry
| Peric
|
Pillitteri
| Pratt
| Provenzano
| Robillard
|
Sgro
| Solomon
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Szabo
| Telegdi
| Valeri
| Whelan – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 226 lost.
4350
The next question is on Motion No. 228. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 228, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marchand
| Mercier
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bélanger
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bonwick
| Byrne
| Cauchon
|
Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Earle
|
Folco
| Fontana
| Godfrey
| Goodale
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Guarnieri
| Harb
| Harvey
|
Herron
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Limoges
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McTeague
|
McWhinney
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Murray
| Nystrom
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Parrish
| Patry
| Peric
|
Pillitteri
| Pratt
| Robillard
| Sgro
|
Solomon
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Szabo
|
Telegdi
| Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
– 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 228 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 230. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4355
(The House divided on Motion No. 230, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Axworthy
| Bailey
| Bélanger
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bonwick
| Byrne
| Cauchon
|
Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Earle
|
Folco
| Fontana
| Godfrey
| Goodale
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Harb
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Limoges
| Malhi
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McTeague
| McWhinney
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Murray
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Parrish
|
Patry
| Peric
| Pillitteri
| Provenzano
|
Robillard
| Sgro
| Solomon
| St - Jacques
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Szabo
| Telegdi
| Valeri
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 230 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 232. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4400
(The House divided on Motion No. 232, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Desrochers
| Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bélanger
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bonwick
| Cadman
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Duncan
|
Earle
| Folco
| Goodale
| Guarnieri
|
Hanger
| Harb
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Limoges
| Malhi
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
|
McTeague
| McWhinney
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Murray
|
Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Patry
| Peric
|
Pratt
| Sgro
| Solomon
| St - Jacques
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Szabo
| Telegdi
| Valeri
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 232 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 233. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4405
(The House divided on Motion No. 233, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bélanger
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bonwick
|
Cadman
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Dockrill
| Duncan
|
Earle
| Easter
| Folco
| Godfrey
|
Goodale
| Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Harb
|
Harvey
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Limoges
| MacAulay
|
Malhi
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McTeague
|
McWhinney
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Murray
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
Patry
| Peric
| Pratt
| Proud
|
Sgro
| Solomon
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Szabo
| Telegdi
| Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 233 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 236. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4410
(The House divided on Motion No. 236, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
|
Duceppe
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Assadourian
| Axworthy
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bélanger
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Bonwick
| Cadman
| Cauchon
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Duncan
| Earle
|
Easter
| Godfrey
| Goodale
| Guarnieri
|
Hanger
| Harb
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Longfield
| MacAulay
| Malhi
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McTeague
| McWhinney
| Murray
|
Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Patry
| Peric
|
Provenzano
| Robillard
| Sgro
| Solomon
|
St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Szabo
| Telegdi
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 236 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 239. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4415
(The House divided on Motion No. 239, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guay
| Lalonde
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Blaikie
| Bonwick
| Cadman
| Cauchon
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Duncan
| Earle
| Easter
|
Folco
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Guarnieri
| Hanger
|
Harb
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Limoges
| Longfield
|
MacAulay
| McKay
(Scarborough East)
| McTeague
| McWhinney
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Murray
| Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
Parrish
| Patry
| Peric
| Pillitteri
|
Proud
| Provenzano
| Shepherd
| Solomon
|
St - Jacques
| Strahl
| Szabo
| Telegdi
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 239 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 241. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 241, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
– 24
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Blaikie
| Bonwick
| Cadman
| Cauchon
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Desjarlais
| Duncan
| Earle
|
Easter
| Folco
| Fontana
| Gallaway
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Harb
|
Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Limoges
| Longfield
|
McTeague
| McWhinney
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Mitchell
| Murray
| Nystrom
| Parrish
|
Patry
| Peric
| Pillitteri
| Proud
|
Provenzano
| Robillard
| Shepherd
| Solomon
|
St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Strahl
| Szabo
|
Telegdi
| Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
|
White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 241 lost.
4420
The next question is on Motion No. 242. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 242, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Desrochers
| Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
| Lalonde
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bélanger
| Benoit
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonwick
| Brison
|
Cadman
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
|
Duncan
| Earle
| Easter
| Folco
|
Fontana
| Gallaway
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Harb
| Harvey
|
Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Limoges
| Mancini
| McTeague
|
McWhinney
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Murray
| Nystrom
|
Parrish
| Patry
| Peric
| Pillitteri
|
Provenzano
| Robillard
| Solomon
| St - Jacques
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Strahl
| Szabo
| Telegdi
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 242 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 243. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4425
(The House divided on Motion No. 243, which was negatived
on the following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Lebel
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
– 22
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Assadourian
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bélair
|
Bélanger
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
|
Blaikie
| Brison
| Byrne
| Cadman
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Duncan
|
Earle
| Easter
| Folco
| Fontana
|
Gallaway
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Guarnieri
|
Hanger
| Harb
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Limoges
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McTeague
|
McWhinney
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Murray
|
Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Parrish
| Patry
|
Peric
| Pillitteri
| Proud
| Provenzano
|
Robillard
| Shepherd
| Solomon
| St - Jacques
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Strahl
| Szabo
| Telegdi
|
Valeri
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 60
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 243 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 244. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4430
(The House divided on Motion No. 244, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Lalonde
| Lebel
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne
– 23
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bélair
| Benoit
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
| Boudria
|
Brison
| Cadman
| Chamberlain
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
|
Dromisky
| Duncan
| Earle
| Fontana
|
Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Guarnieri
| Hanger
|
Harb
| Harvey
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Ianno
| Karygiannis
| Laliberte
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Mitchell
| Nault
|
Nystrom
| Patry
| Phinney
| Proud
|
Robillard
| Saada
| Sgro
| Solomon
|
Speller
| St - Jacques
| Strahl
| Torsney
|
Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood – 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 244 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 245. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4435
(The House divided on Motion No. 245, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Desrochers
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guay
| Lalonde
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Venne – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Assadourian
| Bélair
| Benoit
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
| Boudria
|
Cadman
| Cannis
| Chamberlain
| Charbonneau
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Desjarlais
|
Discepola
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Duncan
|
Earle
| Fontana
| Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Harb
| Harvey
|
Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
|
Karygiannis
| Laliberte
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Mitchell
| Nault
|
Nystrom
| Phinney
| Proud
| Robillard
|
Saada
| Sgro
| Solomon
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Strahl
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
|
Wood – 57
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 245 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 246. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4440
(The House divided on Motion No. 246, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Debien
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Assadourian
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bertrand
| Blaikie
| Brison
| Cadman
|
Cannis
| Catterall
| Chamberlain
| Charbonneau
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Desjarlais
|
Discepola
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Duncan
|
Earle
| Fontana
| Gallaway
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Harb
| Harvey
|
Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
|
Karygiannis
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
| Mancini
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Mitchell
| Nault
|
Nystrom
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| Peric
| Phinney
|
Proud
| Robillard
| Saada
| Sgro
|
Solomon
| Speller
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Strahl
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
|
Wood – 57
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 246 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 247. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4445
(The House divided on Motion No. 247, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Duceppe
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Assadourian
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Benoit
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
| Bryden
| Cadman
|
Cannis
| Catterall
| Chamberlain
| Charbonneau
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Desjarlais
|
Discepola
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Duncan
|
Earle
| Fontana
| Gallaway
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Harb
| Harvey
|
Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
|
Karygiannis
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
| Mancini
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McGuire
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Mitchell
|
Nault
| Nystrom
| Paradis
| Phinney
|
Proud
| Robillard
| Saada
| Sgro
|
Solomon
| Speller
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Strahl
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
|
Wood – 57
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 247 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 248. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4450
(The House divided on Motion No. 248, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Duceppe
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne
– 27
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Assadourian
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Benoit
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
| Brison
| Bryden
|
Byrne
| Cadman
| Cannis
| Catterall
|
Chamberlain
| Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
|
Comuzzi
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
| Dromisky
|
Duhamel
| Duncan
| Earle
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Guarnieri
| Hanger
| Harb
| Harvey
|
Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Ianno
| Karygiannis
|
Keyes
| Laliberte
| Limoges
| MacAulay
|
Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| McGuire
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Nault
| Nystrom
| Paradis
|
Phinney
| Pillitteri
| Proud
| Robillard
|
Saada
| Solomon
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Strahl
| Torsney
|
Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood – 60
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
248 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 249. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 249, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Assadourian
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Benoit
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
| Brison
| Bryden
|
Cadman
| Cannis
| Catterall
| Cauchon
|
Chamberlain
| Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
|
Comuzzi
| Desjarlais
| Discepola
| Dockrill
|
Dromisky
| Duncan
| Earle
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Hanger
| Harb
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Ianno
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
|
Laliberte
| MacAulay
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Nault
| Nystrom
| Paradis
|
Phinney
| Proud
| Robillard
| Saada
|
Solomon
| Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Jacques
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Strahl
| Torsney
| Vanclief
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood – 55
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
249 lost.
4455
The next question is on Motion No. 250. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 250, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne
– 26
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Assadourian
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Benoit
|
Bertrand
| Blaikie
| Bryden
| Cadman
|
Cannis
| Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chamberlain
|
Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
|
Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
|
Duncan
| Earle
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Grey
(Edmonton North)
|
Harb
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Ianno
|
Karygiannis
| Keyes
| Laliberte
| MacAulay
|
Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| McGuire
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Nault
| O'Reilly
| Paradis
|
Phinney
| Pillitteri
| Proud
| Robillard
|
Saada
| Solomon
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
St - Jacques
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Strahl
| Torsney
|
Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood – 56
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
250 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 252. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4500
(The House divided on Motion No. 252, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Mercier
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Assadourian
| Benoit
| Blaikie
|
Bryden
| Cadman
| Cannis
| Catterall
|
Chamberlain
| Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Comuzzi
|
Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
|
Duncan
| Earle
| Gallaway
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Grey
(Edmonton North)
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Karygiannis
|
Keyes
| Laliberte
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
|
McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Nault
| Paradis
|
Peric
| Phinney
| Pillitteri
| Proud
|
Robillard
| Saada
| Solomon
| St. Denis
|
St - Jacques
| St - Julien
| Strahl
| Torsney
|
Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
252 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 253. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour of the
motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4505
(The House divided on Motion No. 253, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marchand
| Mercier
| Plamondon
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Venne – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Assadourian
| Baker
| Benoit
|
Blaikie
| Bonin
| Bryden
| Cadman
|
Cannis
| Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chamberlain
|
Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Comuzzi
| Desjarlais
|
Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Duncan
|
Earle
| Gallaway
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Guarnieri
|
Harb
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
|
Ianno
| Karygiannis
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| McNally
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Nault
| Normand
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
O'Reilly
| Paradis
| Peric
| Phinney
|
Pillitteri
| Proud
| Robillard
| Saada
|
Solomon
| St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| St - Julien
|
Strahl
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood – 60
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
253 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 254. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4510
(The House divided on Motion No. 254, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marchand
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Assadourian
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
|
Benoit
| Blaikie
| Bonin
| Bradshaw
|
Bryden
| Cadman
| Cannis
| Catterall
|
Cauchon
| Chamberlain
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Comuzzi
|
Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
|
Duncan
| Earle
| Gallaway
| Guarnieri
|
Harb
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
|
Ianno
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
| Laliberte
|
Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
| McNally
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Nault
| Normand
| O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
|
O'Reilly
| Paradis
| Phinney
| Proud
|
Robillard
| Saada
| Solomon
| St. Denis
|
St - Jacques
| St - Julien
| Strahl
| Torsney
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood – 55
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
254 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 255. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4515
(The House divided on Motion No. 255, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| de Savoye
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Marchand
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 16
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Assadourian
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
|
Benoit
| Blaikie
| Bradshaw
| Bryden
|
Cadman
| Cannis
| Catterall
| Cauchon
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
| Comuzzi
| Desjarlais
|
Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Duncan
|
Earle
| Gallaway
| Harb
| Herron
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Ianno
| Keyes
|
Maloney
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McDonough
|
McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Nault
| Normand
|
O'Brien
(London – Fanshawe)
| O'Reilly
| Paradis
| Phinney
|
Proud
| Robillard
| Saada
| Shepherd
|
Solomon
| St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| St - Julien
|
Strahl
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
255 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 256. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 256, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| Venne – 19
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Assad
| Assadourian
|
Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Baker
| Benoit
| Blaikie
|
Bradshaw
| Brison
| Bryden
| Cadman
|
Cannis
| Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
|
Duhamel
| Duncan
| Earle
| Gallaway
|
Hanger
| Harb
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Nault
| Normand
| O'Reilly
| Paradis
|
Phinney
| Proud
| Robillard
| Saada
|
Solomon
| St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| St - Julien
|
Strahl
| Torsney
| Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood – 58
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
256 lost.
4520
The next question is on Motion No. 257. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 257, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne
– 24
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assad
| Assadourian
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Baker
| Benoit
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Bradshaw
| Brison
| Cadman
| Cannis
|
Catterall
| Cauchon
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Desjarlais
|
Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duhamel
|
Duncan
| Earle
| Gallaway
| Harb
|
Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| Mancini
| McDonough
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Nault
| Normand
|
Paradis
| Phinney
| Price
| Robillard
|
Saada
| Solomon
| St. Denis
| St - Jacques
|
St - Julien
| Strahl
| Torsney
| Vanclief
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
257 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 258. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4525
(The House divided on Motion No. 258, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Venne – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assad
| Assadourian
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Baker
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Bradshaw
| Brison
| Bryden
|
Bulte
| Cadman
| Cannis
| Chamberlain
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Cotler
| Desjarlais
| DeVillers
|
Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duncan
|
Earle
| Gallaway
| Harb
| Harvey
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McDonough
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Normand
| Paradis
|
Phinney
| Price
| Proud
| Redman
|
Robillard
| Saada
| Sekora
| Solomon
|
St. Denis
| St - Jacques
| St - Julien
| Strahl
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
|
Wood – 57
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
258 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 259. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4530
(The House divided on Motion No. 259, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Venne – 25
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assad
| Assadourian
| Baker
|
Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Bradshaw
| Bryden
| Bulte
| Cadman
|
Cannis
| Chamberlain
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Cotler
|
Desjarlais
| DeVillers
| Dockrill
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
|
Duncan
| Earle
| Easter
| Harb
|
Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Karygiannis
|
Keyes
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McDonough
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Normand
| Paradis
|
Peric
| Phinney
| Price
| Proud
|
Provenzano
| Robillard
| Saada
| Solomon
|
St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Strahl
| Vanclief
|
White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
259 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 260. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4535
(The House divided on Motion No. 260, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne
– 24
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assad
| Assadourian
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Baker
| Bélair
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bertrand
| Bradshaw
| Brison
| Bryden
|
Cadman
| Cannis
| Chamberlain
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Cotler
| Desjarlais
| DeVillers
| Dockrill
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duncan
| Earle
| Harb
|
Harvey
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Normand
| Peric
| Phinney
|
Price
| Proud
| Robillard
| Saada
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
|
Strahl
| Vanclief
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
| Wood – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
260 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 261. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour of the
motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4540
(The House divided on Motion No. 261, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Assad
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Baker
| Bélair
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Blaikie
| Bonwick
| Bradshaw
| Brison
|
Bulte
| Cadman
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
|
Collenette
| Cotler
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duncan
| Earle
| Easter
|
Hanger
| Harb
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Murray
| Normand
| Parrish
|
Price
| Proud
| Provenzano
| Redman
|
Robillard
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Shepherd
|
Solomon
| St - Julien
| Strahl
| Szabo
|
Ur
| Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
|
White
(Langley – Abbotsford) – 57
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
261 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 262. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 262, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne
– 24
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Assad
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bélair
|
Bélanger
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Bonwick
| Brison
| Bulte
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Clouthier
| Collenette
| Cotler
| Desjarlais
|
Dockrill
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duncan
| Earle
|
Gallaway
| Hanger
| Harb
| Herron
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Murray
| Normand
| Parrish
| Price
|
Provenzano
| Redman
| Robillard
| Saada
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Shepherd
| Solomon
|
Strahl
| Szabo
| Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan
| White
(Langley – Abbotsford)
– 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
262 lost.
4545
The next question is on Motion No. 263. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 263, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Dumas
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Alcock
| Assad
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bélair
| Bélanger
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Blaikie
| Bradshaw
| Brison
| Bryden
|
Bulte
| Cadman
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
|
Collenette
| Cotler
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
|
Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duncan
| Earle
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Gallaway
| Hanger
| Harb
|
Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Laliberte
|
Mancini
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Murray
|
Normand
| O'Reilly
| Parrish
| Pillitteri
|
Price
| Provenzano
| Redman
| Robillard
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Shepherd
| Solomon
|
Strahl
| Szabo
| Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan
| Wilfert – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
263 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 264. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4550
(The House divided on Motion No. 264, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Debien
| Dumas
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 19
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Alcock
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
| Bélair
|
Bélanger
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Bonwick
| Cadman
| Clouthier
| Collenette
|
Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Dubé
(Madawaska – Restigouche)
| Duncan
|
Earle
| Easter
| Eggleton
| Gallaway
|
Hanger
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
|
Laliberte
| Mancini
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Murray
| O'Reilly
| Parrish
| Pillitteri
|
Price
| Provenzano
| Robillard
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Sekora
| Shepherd
| Solomon
| St - Jacques
|
Steckle
| Szabo
| Ur
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Whelan – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
264 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 265. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4555
(The House divided on Motion No. 265, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Canuel
| Debien
| Dumas
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guay
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Rocheleau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 19
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Alcock
| Assad
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bélair
| Bélanger
| Blaikie
| Bonwick
|
Cadman
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
|
Duncan
| Earle
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Gallaway
| Hanger
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
|
Laliberte
| Lastewka
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Murray
| O'Reilly
| Parrish
| Pillitteri
|
Provenzano
| Robillard
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Serré
| Shepherd
| Solomon
| St - Jacques
|
Steckle
| Strahl
| Szabo
| Ur
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan – 42
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
265 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 267. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 267, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Girard - Bujold
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne – 12
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Alcock
| Assad
| Bachand
(Richmond – Arthabaska)
|
Bélair
| Bélanger
| Benoit
| Blaikie
|
Cadman
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Earle
|
Easter
| Eggleton
| Gallaway
| Hanger
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
|
Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Murray
| O'Reilly
| Pillitteri
| Provenzano
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Serré
| Solomon
|
St - Jacques – 33
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
267 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 268. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4600
(The House divided on Motion No. 268, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
de Savoye
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Rocheleau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Venne
– 15
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Assad
| Benoit
| Blaikie
|
Bonwick
| Cadman
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Hanger
| Herron
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Laliberte
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Price
| Provenzano
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Serré
| Shepherd
|
Solomon
| Steckle
| Szabo
| Ur
|
Whelan – 29
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 268 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 270. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 270, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
– 15
|
NAYS
Members
Alcock
| Assad
| Bélanger
| Benoit
|
Blaikie
| Collenette
| Earle
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Gallaway
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Hubbard
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
|
Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Murray
| Pillitteri
| Price
| Provenzano
|
Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon – 28
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 270 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Michel Bellehumeur: Madam Speaker, on a point of order. You
are perhaps in a hurry to get home to bed, but I would like you
to read the motions more slowly.
Earlier, for Motion No. 270, you mentioned clauses 1 and 30,
when it was a case of clauses 1 and 3. We voted on that. I
would have liked to intervene—
4605
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): It is possible that I made—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): Order, please. It is quite
possible that I made an error. From now on, I will be more
careful.
The question is on Motion No. 272.
[English]
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 272, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
– 15
|
NAYS
Members
Assad
| Bonwick
| Collenette
| Duncan
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Hanger
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Laliberte
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Price
| Proulx
| Provenzano
| Robillard
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Serré
| Shepherd
|
Solomon
| Steckle
| Szabo
| Ur
|
Whelan – 25
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 272 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 274. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4610
(The House divided on Motion No. 274, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Girard - Bujold
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 16
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Assad
| Baker
| Benoit
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bonin
| Bradshaw
| Brison
|
Cadman
| Collenette
| Copps
| Desjarlais
|
Dromisky
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Hanger
|
Harvey
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Karygiannis
|
Keyes
| Maloney
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mifflin
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Normand
| Price
| Robillard
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
| Vautour – 31
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 274 lost.
The next question is on Motion 276. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4615
[Translation]
(The House divided on Motion No. 276, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Girard - Bujold
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 16
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Baker
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Blaikie
| Bonin
| Bradshaw
| Brison
|
Cadman
| Collenette
| Copps
| Dromisky
|
Earle
| Easter
| Eggleton
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Hanger
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Karygiannis
|
Keyes
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
Mifflin
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Myers
| Normand
|
Price
| Proulx
| Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Solomon
| Vautour
| Whelan – 35
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 276
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 277. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 277, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Girard - Bujold
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 16
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Assad
| Baker
|
Bélair
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Bradshaw
| Cadman
| Collenette
|
Copps
| Dromisky
| Earle
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Hanger
|
Harvey
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
|
Karygiannis
| Keyes
| Laliberte
| Maloney
|
Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Normand
| O'Reilly
| Price
| Proulx
|
Reed
| Robillard
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
|
Vautour
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 43
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 277
lost.
4620
The next question is on Motion No. 278. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the yeas have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 278, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Girard - Bujold
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 16
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Baker
| Barnes
|
Bélair
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Cadman
| Clouthier
| Collenette
|
Copps
| Cotler
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
|
Dromisky
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Fry
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Hanger
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
|
Maloney
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Mifflin
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Normand
| Price
|
Reed
| Robillard
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Serré
| Shepherd
| Solomon
| Vautour
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Wood – 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 278
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 281. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
4625
(The House divided on Motion No. 281, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Girard - Bujold
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 15
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Barnes
| Bélanger
| Benoit
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
| Cadman
|
Collenette
| Cotler
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
|
Dromisky
| Duncan
| Earle
| Eggleton
|
Hanger
| Harvey
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Hubbard
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Maloney
|
Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Mifflin
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| O'Reilly
| Price
|
Proulx
| Reed
| Robillard
| Saada
|
Serré
| Shepherd
| Solomon
| Strahl
|
Szabo
| Vautour
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
|
Wood – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 281
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 282. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
4630
[English]
(The House divided on Motion No. 282, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Girard - Bujold
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 15
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Baker
| Barnes
|
Bélair
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Cadman
| Clouthier
| Collenette
|
Cotler
| Desjarlais
| DeVillers
| Dockrill
|
Dromisky
| Duncan
| Earle
| Eggleton
|
Fry
| Hanger
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
| Laliberte
|
Maloney
| Mancini
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Mifflin
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Price
|
Robillard
| Saada
| Serré
| Shepherd
|
Solomon
| Strahl
| Szabo
| Vautour
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan
| Wood – 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 282 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 284. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 284, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Girard - Bujold
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 15
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Barnes
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bertrand
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Cadman
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
|
DeVillers
| Dockrill
| Dromisky
| Duncan
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Hanger
|
Harvey
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
|
Jackson
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Maloney
|
McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
O'Reilly
| Price
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Solomon
| Strahl
| Vautour
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Wood
– 41
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 284 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 287.
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
4635
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 287, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
|
de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
|
Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 14
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Cadman
|
Clouthier
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Duncan
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Hanger
| Harvey
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Karygiannis
| Keyes
| Laliberte
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Mifflin
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Price
|
Proulx
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Serré
| Shepherd
|
Steckle
| Strahl
| Szabo
| Ur
|
Vautour
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Whelan – 39
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 287 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 290. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4640
(The House divided on Motion No. 290, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 15
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Bélair
| Bélanger
| Benoit
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
| Cadman
|
Copps
| Desjarlais
| DeVillers
| Dockrill
|
Duncan
| Earle
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Hanger
| Harvey
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
|
Hubbard
| Jackson
| Karygiannis
| Keyes
|
Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Maloney
| McCormick
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McTeague
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
O'Reilly
| Price
| Reed
| Saada
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Strahl
| Vautour
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Wood – 41
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 290 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 292. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the yeas
have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4645
(The House divided on Motion No. 292, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Girard - Bujold
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 16
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Baker
| Barnes
|
Bélair
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Cadman
| Copps
| Desjarlais
|
DeVillers
| Dockrill
| Duncan
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Hanger
|
Harvey
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
|
Jackson
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
| Laliberte
|
Lastewka
| Maloney
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
McTeague
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Myers
|
Normand
| O'Reilly
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Price
|
Reed
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Serré
|
Solomon
| St - Julien
| Strahl
| Szabo
|
Vanclief
| Vautour
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 292 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 294. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4650
[Translation]
After the taking of the vote:
Mr. Ghislain Fournier: Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I
actually did vote on this motion; I rose, but I did not hear my
name. The clerk turned around. I would like to know if my vote
has indeed been recorded.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): Yes, your vote has been
recorded.
Mr. Gérard Asselin: Madam Speaker, to prevent this from
happening again, I suggest that the member rise to vote when it
is his turn to do so. This would eliminate the problem. It is
the third time the member rises on a point of order to have his
vote recorded.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I do not think this is a
point of order.
[English]
(The House divided on Motion No. 294, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Girard - Bujold
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 16
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Alcock
| Baker
|
Bélair
| Bélanger
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Cadman
|
Copps
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Duncan
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Finlay
| Fry
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Hanger
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Jackson
| Keyes
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
| McCormick
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McTeague
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Red Deer)
|
Normand
| O'Reilly
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Price
|
Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
| St - Julien
|
Strahl
| Vanclief
| Vautour
| Wasylycia - Leis – 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion 294
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 299. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4655
(The House divided on Motion No. 299, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Girard - Bujold
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 16
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Alcock
| Baker
|
Barnes
| Bélair
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bonin
| Cadman
| Casson
| Copps
|
Desjarlais
| DeVillers
| Dockrill
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Finlay
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Hanger
| Harris
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
| Jackson
| Keyes
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Maloney
|
McCormick
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Normand
|
O'Reilly
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Price
| Reed
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Strahl
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Wood – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 299 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 300. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour of
the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 300, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
– 15
|
NAYS
Members
Abbott
| Adams
| Alcock
| Baker
|
Barnes
| Bélair
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bonin
| Cadman
| Casson
| Clouthier
|
Desjarlais
| DeVillers
| Dockrill
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Finlay
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Harris
| Herron
| Hill
(Macleod)
| Hubbard
|
Jackson
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Maloney
|
McCormick
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Red Deer)
| Myers
|
Normand
| O'Reilly
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Price
|
Proulx
| Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
|
St - Julien
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Vanclief
|
Vautour
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 300 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 301.
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
4700
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 301, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
|
de Savoye
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 13
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Baker
| Barnes
|
Bélair
| Benoit
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Cannis
| Casson
| Clouthier
|
Desjarlais
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Finlay
|
Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Harris
|
Herron
| Hubbard
| Jackson
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Keyes
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Lastewka
| Maloney
| McCormick
| Mifflin
|
Mills
(Red Deer)
| Myers
| Normand
| O'Reilly
|
Phinney
| Price
| Proulx
| Reed
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Strahl
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Wood – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 301 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 302. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4705
(The House divided on Motion No. 302, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 12
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Barnes
| Bélair
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
| Calder
|
Cannis
| Casson
| Clouthier
| Collenette
|
Copps
| Desjarlais
| DeVillers
| Dockrill
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Harris
| Herron
| Hubbard
|
Jackson
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
|
Keyes
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
|
Maloney
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
|
Mifflin
| Myers
| Normand
| O'Reilly
|
Phinney
| Price
| Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Solomon
| St - Julien
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Vautour
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood
– 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 302 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 303. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4710
(The House divided on Motion No. 303, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 12
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Anders
| Barnes
|
Bélair
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Cannis
| Casson
| Clouthier
| Collenette
|
Copps
| Desjarlais
| DeVillers
| Dockrill
|
Earle
| Elley
| Finlay
| Fry
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Harris
| Herron
|
Hubbard
| Jackson
| Jaffer
| Karygiannis
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
|
Mifflin
| Normand
| Phinney
| Reed
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Strahl
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Wood – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 303 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 304. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour of
the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the nays
have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4715
[Translation]
(The House divided on Motion No. 304, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
| Fournier
|
Girard - Bujold
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Perron
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 11
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Anders
| Baker
|
Bélair
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Cannis
| Casson
|
Clouthier
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
|
Earle
| Elley
| Finlay
| Fry
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Harris
| Herron
|
Hubbard
| Jackson
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Karygiannis
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Laliberte
| Maloney
|
McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Mifflin
|
Normand
| Phinney
| Price
| Proctor
|
Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
| St - Julien
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 304
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 305. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 305, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 12
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Anders
| Baker
|
Bélair
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Cannis
| Caplan
|
Casson
| Clouthier
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
|
Dockrill
| Earle
| Elley
| Finlay
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Harris
| Herron
|
Jackson
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McCormick
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Mifflin
| Normand
|
Phinney
| Price
| Proctor
| Reed
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Wood – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 305
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 306. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
4720
(The House divided on Motion No. 306, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 12
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Anders
| Baker
|
Bélair
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Cannis
| Caplan
|
Casson
| Clouthier
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
|
Dockrill
| Earle
| Elley
| Finlay
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Harris
| Herron
|
Jackson
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McCormick
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Mifflin
| Normand
|
Phinney
| Price
| Proctor
| Reed
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
| Wappel
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 306
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 307. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
4725
(The House divided on Motion No. 307, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 12
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Anders
| Baker
|
Bélair
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Cannis
| Caplan
|
Casson
| Clouthier
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
|
Dockrill
| Earle
| Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Gruending
| Harris
| Herron
|
Jackson
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McCormick
|
McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Mifflin
|
Normand
| Phinney
| Price
| Proctor
|
Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
| St - Julien
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Vanclief
| Wappel
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 307
lost.
Mr. Ghislain Fournier: Madam Speaker, on a point of order. I do
not know whether it is because I am not a tall person, although
I am a rather large one, but I did not hear the clerk mention my
name when the votes were recorded. Was my vote in fact
recorded?
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): Yes, your vote was indeed
recorded.
The next question is on Motion No. 308. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
4730
[English]
(The House divided on Motion No. 308, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 12
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Alcock
| Anders
| Baker
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
| Bonwick
|
Brown
| Bryden
| Calder
| Cannis
|
Caplan
| Casson
| Clouthier
| Collenette
|
Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Earle
| Finlay
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Gruending
| Harris
|
Herron
| Jackson
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Karygiannis
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Maloney
| McCormick
| McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
McNally
| Mifflin
| Normand
| Phinney
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Price
| Proctor
| Reed
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
| Wappel
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 308 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 309. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 309, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Canuel
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Laurin
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 12
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Blaikie
| Bonin
| Brown
| Bryden
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Casson
| Clouthier
|
Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Elley
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Gruending
| Harris
| Herron
|
Jackson
| Jaffer
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McCormick
|
McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Mifflin
|
Myers
| Normand
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Price
| Proctor
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Serré
|
Solomon
| St - Julien
| Torsney
| Vanclief
|
Vautour
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 52
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 309 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 310.
4735
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 310, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Bellehumeur
| Canuel
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Girard - Bujold
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis) – 11
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bennett
|
Blaikie
| Bradshaw
| Brown
| Calder
|
Cannis
| Caplan
| Casson
| Clouthier
|
Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Elley
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Gruending
| Harris
| Herron
|
Jackson
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
|
McCormick
| McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
|
Mifflin
| Myers
| Normand
| Phinney
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Price
| Proctor
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Serré
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Wood – 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 310 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 311. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4740
(The House divided on Motion No. 311, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Canuel
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Laurin
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
– 13
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Blaikie
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Bryden
| Calder
|
Cannis
| Caplan
| Casson
| Clouthier
|
Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Elley
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Gruending
| Harris
| Herron
|
Jackson
| Jaffer
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McCormick
|
McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Mifflin
|
Myers
| Normand
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Price
| Proctor
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Serré
|
Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
| Wappel
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No. 311 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Michel Bellehumeur: Madam Speaker, on a point of order. It
is now 11.45 p.m. and, should you ask the House, I am sure you
would find unanimous consent to thank the pages who did an
excellent job during these long hours. I know some of them will
be leaving at midnight, namely Rachelle, Natalie, Greg,
Adrienne, Sonja, Cheryl, Mélanie, Eric, Meg and David.
I think we should give them a good round of applause and thank
them for their excellent work.
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): The hon. member is
asking that we give a token of appreciation to our pages who will
be leaving us in about 15 minutes. I think we all agree with
that.
Some hon. members: Hear, hear.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): The next question is
on Motion No. 312. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the
motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4745
(The House divided on Motion No. 312, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Canuel
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Laurin
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
– 13
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Barnes
|
Blaikie
| Brown
| Bryden
| Caplan
|
Casson
| Collenette
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Elley
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gruending
| Herron
| Jackson
|
Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McDonough
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Myers
| Normand
|
Parrish
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Price
|
Proctor
| Proulx
| Serré
| Solomon
|
St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Vautour
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
312 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 313. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour of
the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the yeas
have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4750
(The House divided on Motion No. 313, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Canuel
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Laurin
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
– 13
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Baker
| Brown
| Bryden
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Casson
| Collenette
|
Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Elley
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
|
Gruending
| Herron
| Jackson
| Jaffer
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Maloney
| McCormick
|
McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Myers
|
Normand
| Parrish
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Price
| Proctor
| Proulx
| Sekora
|
Solomon
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Vautour
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
313 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 314. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4755
(The House divided on Motion No. 314, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Canuel
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Laurin
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
– 13
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
| Blaikie
|
Bryden
| Caplan
| Casson
| Collenette
|
Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Elley
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
|
Gruending
| Herron
| Jackson
| Jaffer
|
Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Maloney
|
McCormick
| McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
|
Myers
| Normand
| Phinney
| Price
|
Proctor
| Proulx
| Sekora
| Solomon
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Vautour
|
Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
314 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 315. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 315, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Canuel
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Laurin
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 15
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
| Blaikie
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
| Casson
|
Collenette
| Davies
| Desjarlais
| Dockrill
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Elley
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Gruending
| Herron
|
Jackson
| Jaffer
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Lastewka
| Maloney
| McCormick
| McDonough
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Myers
| Normand
|
Phinney
| Price
| Proctor
| Proulx
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Vautour
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
|
Wood
– 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): I declare Motion No.
315 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 316. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4800
(The House divided on Motion No. 316, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 15
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Barnes
|
Bélair
| Blaikie
| Bonin
| Bonwick
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
| Casson
|
Clouthier
| Collenette
| Cullen
| Davies
|
Desjarlais
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Elley
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
|
Gruending
| Harris
| Herron
| Jackson
|
Jaffer
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
|
Maloney
| McCormick
| McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
McNally
| Mifflin
| Myers
| Normand
|
Parrish
| Phinney
| Price
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Provenzano
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
|
Stoffer
| Torsney
| Vautour
| Wappel
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 58
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 316 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 317. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4805
(The House divided on Motion No. 317, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Canuel
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 14
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Barnes
|
Bélair
| Blaikie
| Bonin
| Bonwick
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
| Casson
|
Collenette
| Cullen
| Davies
| Desjarlais
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Elley
|
Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Harris
|
Herron
| Jackson
| Jaffer
| Jordan
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Maloney
| McCormick
|
McDonough
| McNally
| Mifflin
| Myers
|
Normand
| Parrish
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
| Provenzano
|
Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
| Stoffer
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
| Wappel
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood
– 58
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 317 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 318. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4810
(The House divided on Motion No. 318, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Canuel
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 15
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Barnes
| Bélair
| Bennett
|
Bonin
| Bonwick
| Bryden
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Casson
| Clouthier
| Collenette
|
Cullen
| Davies
| Desjarlais
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Elley
| Fry
| Grewal
|
Harris
| Jaffer
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| McCormick
| McDonough
|
McNally
| Mifflin
| Myers
| Normand
|
Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Provenzano
| Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Solomon
| Stoffer
| Torsney
| Vanclief
|
Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 318 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 319. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4815
[Translation]
(The House divided on Motion No. 319, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Canuel
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 17
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Barnes
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bonin
| Bonwick
| Bryden
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Casson
| Clouthier
|
Collenette
| Cullen
| Davies
| Desjarlais
|
Dion
| Doyle
| Earle
| Eggleton
|
Elley
| Grewal
| Harris
| Herron
|
Jaffer
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Maloney
| McCormick
| McDonough
| McNally
|
Minna
| Myers
| Normand
| Phinney
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Solomon
| Stoffer
| Torsney
| Vanclief
|
Vautour
| Wappel
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 56
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 319 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 320. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 320, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Canuel
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 17
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Barnes
|
Bélair
| Blaikie
| Bonin
| Bryden
|
Calder
| Casson
| Clouthier
| Collenette
|
Comuzzi
| Cullen
| Davies
| Desjarlais
|
DeVillers
| Dion
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Elley
| Fry
| Grewal
|
Herron
| Jaffer
| Jordan
| Karygiannis
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| McNally
| Myers
|
Normand
| O'Reilly
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Pratt
| Proctor
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Reed
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Vanclief
| Wappel
|
Wood – 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 320 lost.
4820
The next question is on Motion No. 321. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 321, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Canuel
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 17
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
| Bennett
|
Blaikie
| Bonin
| Bryden
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Casson
| Clouthier
| Collenette
|
Comuzzi
| Cullen
| DeVillers
| Dion
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Elley
| Fry
|
Grewal
| Jaffer
| Jordan
| Karygiannis
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Maloney
| McNally
| Myers
| Normand
|
Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Proctor
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
| St - Julien
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Vanclief
|
Wappel
| Wood – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 321 lost.
Mr. Yvan Loubier: Mr. Speaker, on a point of order. I would like
you to clarify certain rules for us. Earlier, the clerk called
out the names of several Liberal members who were not standing
in their place. I would like you to tell us what the rule is. Do
members have to rise so their votes can be recorded or does the
clerk call out their names automatically even though they are
sitting down? That was the case for at least seven Liberal
members earlier. Can you clarify that rule for us?
The Deputy Speaker: I am sure the only votes that are counted
are those of members who are standing in their place when the
division is taken. I will look more closely to make sure that
this is the case. I thank the member for his vigilance.
Mr. Yvan Loubier: Mr. Speaker, I think it would be preferable to
start all over again in this case. I saw at least ten Liberal
members who were sitting down but whose names were called out by
the clerk with those opposing the motion—
An hon. member: A procedural error has occurred.
Mr. Yvan Loubier: There were at least ten of them.
4825
The Deputy Speaker: I am certain that the clerk counted the
members only when they were standing in their places. I am sure
that is always the case. We do not want to recount the vote at
this point.
I believe that the procedure is correct, and we can proceed to
the next question, which is on Motion No. 322.
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 322, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Canuel
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marchand
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 16
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
| Casson
|
Clouthier
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Cullen
|
DeVillers
| Dion
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Elley
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
|
Harris
| Jaffer
| Jordan
| Karygiannis
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| McNally
| Phinney
|
Pratt
| Proctor
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Solomon
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Vanclief
| Wappel
| Wood – 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 322 lost.
Mr. Odina Desrochers: Mr. Speaker, on a point of order. I am
glad to see that the clerk has carefully followed the
recommendations of the member for Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot and taken
the time to identify Liberal members in the House one by one.
We are reassured that this parliament is following the rules of
democracy.
The Deputy Speaker: We always take the suggestions of the hon.
member for Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot very seriously.
The next question is on Motion No. 323. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4830
[English]
(The House divided on Motion No. 323, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 19
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
| Casson
|
Clouthier
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Dockrill
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Elley
| Fry
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Harris
| Jaffer
|
Jordan
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Phinney
| Pratt
|
Price
| Proctor
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Solomon
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Vanclief
| Wood – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 323 lost.
I must caution the hon. member for Calgary West who displayed a
sign during the voting. He must know that is quite contrary to
the rules and I know he would want to comply with the rules in
every respect.
The next question is on Motion No. 324. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4835
(The House divided on Motion No. 324, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Desrochers
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 18
|
NAYS
Members
Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
| Bonin
| Bryden
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Casson
| Clouthier
|
Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Davies
| DeVillers
|
Dion
| Doyle
| Earle
| Elley
|
Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Harris
|
Herron
| Jaffer
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
|
McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Phinney
|
Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Sekora
| Solomon
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
| Wood – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 324 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 325. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4840
(The House divided on Motion No. 325, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
– 18
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Barnes
|
Bélair
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Blaikie
|
Bonin
| Calder
| Caplan
| Casson
|
Clouthier
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Cullen
|
Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Elley
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Harris
| Herron
| Jaffer
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McDonough
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Phinney
| Pratt
|
Price
| Proctor
| Solomon
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
|
Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 325 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 326. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4845
(The House divided on Motion No. 326, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Barnes
|
Bélair
| Bennett
| Bonin
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Casson
| Clouthier
| Collenette
|
Cullen
| Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
|
Earle
| Elley
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Harris
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| McDonough
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Phinney
| Pratt
| Proctor
| Solomon
|
St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Vanclief
| Wasylycia - Leis
| Wood – 43
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 326 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 327. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 327, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 19
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Barnes
|
Bélair
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Casson
| Collenette
| Cullen
|
Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Elley
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Harris
| Herron
| Jaffer
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Provenzano
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
|
Wood – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 327 lost.
I have to advise the hon. member for Calgary West that if he
persists in his disobedience of the Chair's instructions I will
have his vote removed and discounted.
The question is on Motion No. 328. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4850
(The House divided on Motion No. 328, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 19
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Caplan
| Casson
|
Clouthier
| Collenette
| Cullen
| Davies
|
DeVillers
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Elley
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Harris
| Herron
| Jaffer
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Provenzano
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Vautour
| Wood
– 43
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 328 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 329. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4855
(The House divided on Motion No. 329, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 18
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bonin
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Casson
| Clouthier
| Collenette
| Cullen
|
Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Elley
| Fry
|
Grewal
| Harris
| Herron
| Jaffer
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Provenzano
| Solomon
| St - Julien
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Vautour
| Wood – 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 329 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 330. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 330, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 18
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bonin
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Casson
| Clouthier
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
|
Cullen
| Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
| Elley
|
Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Herron
| Jaffer
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Maloney
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Pratt
|
Price
| Proulx
| Sekora
| Solomon
|
St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Vautour
|
Wood
– 41
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 330 lost.
The next question is Motion No. 331. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4900
(The House divided on Motion No. 331, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 19
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
| Casson
|
Clouthier
| Collenette
| Cullen
| Davies
|
DeVillers
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Elley
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Herron
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
McNally
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
|
St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Vautour
|
Wood – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 331 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 332. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4905
(The House divided on Motion No. 332, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 17
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Clouthier
| Collenette
| Cullen
| Davies
|
DeVillers
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Herron
|
Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
McNally
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Price
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
|
St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Vautour
|
Wood – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 332 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 333. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 333, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Clouthier
| Collenette
| Cullen
| Davies
|
DeVillers
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Herron
|
Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Maloney
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
|
Myers
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Price
|
Proctor
| Proulx
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
|
St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Vautour
|
Wood – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 333 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 334.
4910
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 334, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
| Clouthier
|
Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Davies
| DeVillers
|
Dion
| Earle
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Jaffer
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Laliberte
|
Maloney
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
|
Myers
| O'Reilly
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
|
Proctor
| Proulx
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
|
St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Wood
– 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 334 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 335. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4915
[Translation]
(The House divided on Motion No. 335, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Clouthier
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Cullen
|
Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Herron
|
Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Maloney
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
|
Myers
| O'Reilly
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
|
Price
| Proctor
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Torsney
|
Vautour
| Wood – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 335 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 336. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4920
(The House divided on Motion No. 336, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Bryden
| Calder
| Casson
|
Clouthier
| Collenette
| Comuzzi
| Cullen
|
DeVillers
| Dion
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Elley
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
|
Herron
| Jaffer
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Karygiannis
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
O'Reilly
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Price
|
Proctor
| Proulx
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Vautour
|
Wood – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 336 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 337. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4925
(The House divided on Motion No. 337, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Casson
| Clouthier
| Collenette
| Cullen
|
DeVillers
| Dion
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Elley
| Finlay
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Herron
| Jaffer
| Jordan
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
O'Reilly
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Price
|
Proctor
| Proulx
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Solomon
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Vautour
| Wood – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 337 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 338. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 338, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Crête
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guimond
| Loubier
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Comuzzi
| Cullen
| DeVillers
| Dion
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Elley
| Finlay
|
Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Herron
|
Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
|
McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| O'Reilly
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
| Proulx
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Vautour
| Wood – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 338 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 339. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4930
[English]
(The House divided on Motion No. 339, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Crête
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guimond
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Casson
| Comuzzi
| Cullen
| DeVillers
|
Dion
| Doyle
| Earle
| Elley
|
Finlay
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
|
Herron
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Maloney
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| O'Reilly
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Vautour
|
Wood – 49
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 339 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 340. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4935
(The House divided on Motion No. 340, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Calder
| Caplan
| Comuzzi
|
Cullen
| Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Elley
| Finlay
|
Grewal
| Harris
| Herron
| Jaffer
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Karygiannis
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McCormick
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| O'Reilly
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
|
Price
| Proctor
| Proulx
| Sekora
|
Solomon
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Vautour
| Wood – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 340 lost.
[Translation]
I must say that I have heard certain remarks about the Speaker's
ears.
An hon. member: His ears?
The Deputy Speaker: Yes, his ears, because I usually have no
difficulty hearing the yeas and the nays. But I have to say
that, tonight, each time I determined that the yeas had it, the
result of the vote showed the opposite. That has been going on
since I came in at midnight.
I am afraid of making too many mistakes. That is why I have to
listen very carefully.
As members know, I always try to do it in a non-partisan manner.
[English]
The next question is on Motion No. 341. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4940
(The House divided on Motion No. 341, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Desrochers
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bevilacqua
| Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Casson
| Comuzzi
| Cullen
| Davies
|
Dion
| Doyle
| Earle
| Elley
|
Finlay
| Fry
| Grewal
| Harris
|
Herron
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
|
McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| O'Reilly
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Vautour – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 341 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 342. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4945
(The House divided on Motion No. 342, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bélair
|
Bennett
| Bevilacqua
| Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Casson
| Comuzzi
| Cullen
| Davies
|
DeVillers
| Dion
| Earle
| Elley
|
Fry
| Grewal
| Harris
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Maloney
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
|
Mifflin
| O'Reilly
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
|
Proctor
| Proulx
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Solomon
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney – 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 342 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 343. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4950
(The House divided on Motion No. 343, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bennett
|
Bevilacqua
| Blaikie
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
| Casson
|
Comuzzi
| Cullen
| Davies
| Dion
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Elley
| Finlay
|
Fry
| Grewal
| Harris
| Jackson
|
Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McCormick
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Mifflin
| O'Reilly
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Vautour – 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 343 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 344. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
4955
(The House divided on Motion No. 344, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Caplan
| Casson
|
Comuzzi
| Cullen
| Davies
| DeVillers
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Elley
| Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
|
Harris
| Jackson
| Jaffer
| Jordan
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
McNally
| Mifflin
| Myers
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
| Solomon
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney – 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 344 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 345. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 345, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bryden
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Casson
| Comuzzi
|
Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Elley
| Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Jackson
| Jaffer
| Jordan
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
|
Mifflin
| Myers
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
|
Price
| Proctor
| Proulx
| Solomon
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney – 43
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 345 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 346. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5000
(The House divided on Motion No. 346, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bennett
|
Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bryden
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Casson
| Comuzzi
| Davies
|
DeVillers
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Earle
|
Elley
| Finlay
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
|
Harris
| Jackson
| Jaffer
| Jordan
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Laliberte
|
Maloney
| McNally
| Mifflin
| Myers
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Proctor
| Proulx
|
Solomon
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney – 40
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 346 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 347. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5005
(The House divided on Motion No. 347, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Guimond
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp
– 18
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Casson
| Clouthier
| Comuzzi
|
Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Elley
| Finlay
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Harris
| Jackson
|
Jaffer
| Jordan
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| McNally
| Mifflin
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Vautour – 43
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 347 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 348. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 348, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Guimond
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp – 19
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Baker
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bradshaw
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Comuzzi
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
| Finlay
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Grewal
| Harris
| Jackson
|
Jaffer
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| McNally
| Mifflin
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Proctor
| Proulx
|
Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Vautour – 38
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 348 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 349. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5010
(The House divided on Motion No. 349, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Grewal
| Loubier
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Bélair
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Comuzzi
| Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
| Finlay
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Harris
| Jackson
| Jaffer
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Laliberte
|
Maloney
| McNally
| Mifflin
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Proctor
| Proulx
| Solomon
| St - Julien
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Vautour
|
Wood – 37
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 349 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 350. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5015
[Translation]
(The House divided on Motion No. 350, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Grewal
| Guimond
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Bélair
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Calder
| Caplan
|
Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Jackson
|
Jaffer
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Laliberte
|
Maloney
| McNally
| Mifflin
| O'Reilly
|
Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
|
Wood – 37
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 350 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 351. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 351, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Loubier
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp – 16
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Bélair
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bradshaw
| Bryden
| Caplan
| Casson
|
Davies
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Jackson
| Jaffer
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Laliberte
| Maloney
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Mifflin
| Myers
|
O'Reilly
| Phinney
| Pratt
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Provenzano
| Solomon
| St - Julien
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Vanclief
| Vautour
|
Wood – 37
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 351 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 352. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5020
(The House divided on Motion No. 352, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
Turp – 13
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Anders
| Bélair
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bradshaw
| Bryden
| Caplan
|
Casson
| Comuzzi
| Davies
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Grewal
| Harris
| Jackson
| Jaffer
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
| Laliberte
|
Maloney
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Mifflin
|
Myers
| O'Reilly
| Phinney
| Pratt
|
Price
| Proctor
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Vanclief
|
Vautour
| Wood – 42
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 352 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 353. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 353, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Casson
| Desrochers
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Grewal
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Turp – 16
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Bélair
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bradshaw
| Bryden
| Caplan
| Comuzzi
|
Davies
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Elley
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Harris
|
Jackson
| Jaffer
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
McNally
| Mifflin
| Myers
| O'Reilly
|
Phinney
| Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Provenzano
| Solomon
| St - Julien
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Vanclief
| Vautour
|
Wood – 41
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 353 lost.
5025
The next question is on Motion No. 354. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 354, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Grewal
| Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 18
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Bélair
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bradshaw
| Bryden
| Caplan
| Casson
|
Davies
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Elley
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Jackson
|
Jaffer
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
|
Myers
| O'Reilly
| Phinney
| Price
|
Proctor
| Proulx
| Provenzano
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Vanclief
|
Vautour
| Wood
– 38
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 354 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 355. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5030
[English]
(The House divided on Motion No. 355, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Grewal
| Guimond
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
– 18
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Baker
| Bélair
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bradshaw
| Caplan
| Casson
|
Clouthier
| Comuzzi
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Elley
| Fry
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Jackson
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Laliberte
| Maloney
|
Mark
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Myers
|
O'Reilly
| Phinney
| Price
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Provenzano
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Solomon
|
St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Torsney
| Vanclief
|
Vautour
| Wood – 42
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 355 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 356. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 356, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Grewal
| Guimond
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Baker
| Bélair
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bradshaw
| Bryden
| Calder
|
Casson
| Clouthier
| Davies
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
| Fry
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Jackson
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Kraft Sloan
|
Laliberte
| Maloney
| Mark
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
McNally
| Myers
| Phinney
| Price
|
Proctor
| Proulx
| Provenzano
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Torsney
|
Vanclief
| Vautour
| Wood – 43
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 356 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 357.
5035
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 357, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Grewal
| Guimond
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Baker
| Bélair
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bradshaw
| Calder
| Casson
|
Clouthier
| Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
| Fry
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Jackson
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Laliberte
| Maloney
|
Mark
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Myers
| Phinney
|
Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
| Provenzano
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
| St - Julien
|
Stoffer
| Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
|
Wood
– 41
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 357 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 358. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5040
(The House divided on Motion No. 358, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Grewal
| Guimond
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Baker
| Bélair
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Calder
| Casson
|
Clouthier
| Cullen
| Davies
| DeVillers
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Elley
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Jackson
| Jaffer
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Maloney
| Mark
|
McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Phinney
| Price
|
Proctor
| Provenzano
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Vanclief
| Vautour
| Wood – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 358 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 359. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5045
Before the taking of the vote:
The Deputy Speaker: I understand that the hon. the
Secretary of State for Multiculturalism and Status of Women is
suffering from a sore back and has asked if she can vote from her
seat. I will arrange for her vote to be counted in subsequent
votes if she nods indicating her intention to vote from her seat.
(The House divided on Motion No. 359, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Grewal
| Guimond
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Baker
| Bélair
| Bennett
|
Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
| Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
|
Bradshaw
| Brown
| Calder
| Casson
|
Clouthier
| Cullen
| Davies
| DeVillers
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Jackson
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Laliberte
| Maloney
| Mark
|
McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Phinney
|
Price
| Proctor
| Provenzano
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Sekora
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
|
Telegdi
| Torsney
| Vanclief
| Wood – 44
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 359 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 360. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5050
(The House divided on Motion No. 360, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Baker
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Bradshaw
|
Brown
| Calder
| Casson
| Clouthier
|
Cullen
| Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
| Elley
|
Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Jackson
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Laliberte
|
Lastewka
| Maloney
| Mark
| McCormick
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Mifflin
| Phinney
|
Pratt
| Price
| Proctor
| Provenzano
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
| St - Julien
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Telegdi
| Torsney
|
Vanclief
| Wood – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Deputy Speaker: I declare Motion No. 360 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 361. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion
will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say
nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5055
(The House divided on Motion No. 361, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Dumas
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Grewal
| Guimond
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Baker
| Bennett
| Bernier
(Tobique – Mactaquac)
|
Bevilacqua
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Bradshaw
|
Brown
| Calder
| Casson
| Clouthier
|
Cullen
| Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
| Elley
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Jackson
| Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
|
Maloney
| Mark
| McCormick
| McNally
|
Mifflin
| Myers
| Phinney
| Pratt
|
Price
| Proctor
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Telegdi
| Torsney
| Wood – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 361 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Yvan Bernier: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I would
like to take advantage of the fact that it is 2.55 a.m. to point
out that there has been a change of shift among the
interpreters. Speaking of the interpreters, there is a
brilliant interpreter in the booth who usually travels with the
Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans.
Speaking of fisheries, it is approximately 4.30 a.m. in
Newfoundland. I seek the unanimous consent of the House to hear
whether the member for Gander—Grand Falls thinks that the people
of Newfoundland would be more interested in speaking about the
economic problems faced by fishers than about—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I am sure all
members join together in recognizing the yeoman duty of the
interpreters, especially when I am speaking French.
The question is on Motion No. 362. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5100
(The House divided on Motion No. 362, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Grewal
| Guimond
| Loubier
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Baker
| Bennett
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Bradshaw
| Calder
|
Casey
| Casson
| Cullen
| Davies
|
DeVillers
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Jackson
|
Jaffer
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Laliberte
| Lastewka
| Maloney
| Mark
|
McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Mifflin
|
Myers
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
|
Proctor
| Proulx
| Provenzano
| Scott
(Fredericton)
|
Sekora
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Telegdi
| Torsney
| Wood – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 362 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 363. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5105
(The House divided on Motion No. 363, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Anders
| Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Baker
| Bennett
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Calder
| Casey
|
Clouthier
| Cullen
| Davies
| DeVillers
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Jackson
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
|
Lunn
| Maloney
| Mark
| McCormick
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| McNally
| Mifflin
| Obhrai
|
Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proctor
| Proulx
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
| St - Julien
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Telegdi
| Torsney
|
Wood – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 363 lost.
Before we get to the hon. member's point of order, I want to do
a point of order of my own. This is the rule: Members have to
be in the House when I put the question to vote. If members are
not in the House when I put the question, they do not vote. No
cell phones are allowed, not even behind the curtain. We will
leave our domestic animals at home. I understand the hon. member
over there has had special dispensation not to rise. If any
other member wishes it, send me a note. On a point of order the
hon. member for Repentigny.
[Translation]
Mr. Benoît Sauvageau: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.
When I rose to vote, you very clearly heard—the whole House
heard—absolutely disgraceful remarks which I will not repeat
here, because it would show a lack of respect for the House. I
know that it is 3 a.m., but people may and should be watching.
I ask the member for Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke to withdraw his
words and to show that he knows how to behave properly in the
House.
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I am sure the hon.
member would be quite happy to withdraw the words. I have
already made a point of admonishing the hon. member in the House.
The hon. member for Pembroke.
Mr. Hec Clouthier: Mr. Speaker, I was referring to a four
legged animal called a donkey. If the hon. member took it the
wrong way I apologize.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I did not ask you to
dig the hole any deeper, I just asked you to withdraw the words.
Either you will withdraw the words or you will not.
Mr. Hec Clouthier: I will withdraw the words, Mr. Speaker.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): The next question is
on Motion No. 364. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the
motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5110
(The House divided on Motion No. 364, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Baker
| Bennett
| Bertrand
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Borotsik
| Casey
|
Clouthier
| Cullen
| Cummins
| Davies
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Jackson
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Knutson
| Laliberte
| Lastewka
|
Lowther
| Lunn
| Maloney
| Mark
|
McCormick
| McNally
| Mifflin
| Obhrai
|
Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proctor
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
|
St - Julien
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Telegdi
|
Torsney
| Wood – 46
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 364 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 365. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5115
[Translation]
(The House divided on Motion No. 365, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Adams
| Baker
| Bennett
| Bertrand
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Borotsik
| Calder
|
Casey
| Clouthier
| Cullen
| Cummins
|
Davies
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Herron
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jackson
| Jennings
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Knutson
| Lastewka
|
Lowther
| Lunn
| Maloney
| Mark
|
McCormick
| McNally
| Mifflin
| Obhrai
|
Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
| St - Julien
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Wood – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 365
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 366. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 366, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Baker
| Bakopanos
| Bennett
| Bertrand
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Borotsik
| Bryden
|
Calder
| Casey
| Clouthier
| Cullen
|
Cummins
| Davies
| Dion
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Herron
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jackson
| Jennings
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Knutson
| Lastewka
|
Lowther
| Lunn
| Maloney
| Mark
|
McCormick
| McNally
| Mifflin
| Obhrai
|
Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proctor
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
|
St - Julien
| Stinson
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Wood – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 366
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 367. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
5120
(The House divided on Motion No. 367, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Baker
| Bakopanos
| Bennett
| Bertrand
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Borotsik
| Bradshaw
|
Bryden
| Calder
| Casey
| Clouthier
|
Cullen
| Cummins
| Davies
| Dion
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jackson
| Jennings
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Knutson
|
Lastewka
| Lowther
| Maloney
| Mark
|
McCormick
| McNally
| Mifflin
| Obhrai
|
Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proctor
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Solomon
|
St - Julien
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Wood – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 367
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 368. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5125
(The House divided on Motion No. 368, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Bakopanos
| Bennett
| Bertrand
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Bradshaw
| Bryden
|
Casey
| Clouthier
| Cullen
| Cummins
|
Davies
| Dion
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
|
Jackson
| Jennings
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lastewka
| Lowther
| Lunn
|
Maloney
| Mark
| McCormick
| McNally
|
Mifflin
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Stinson
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Wood – 45
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 368
lost.
Mr. Michel Bellehumeur: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I
think you will find unanimous consent for what I am now
proposing.
As the pages have been doing an excellent job—since midnight we
have a new group—I think the House should thank them for a job
well done.
I am going to name them, something that we rarely do—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I am sure all hon.
members join the hon. member for Berthier—Montcalm and the other
members of his caucus in recognizing the wonderful job that the
pages do.
[Translation]
Mrs. Suzanne Tremblay: Mr. Speaker, we ask your permission to
name the pages so that history will remember them, just as we
named the pages who were here before midnight.
They are Annick, Kaija, Sonya—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh.
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): Unfortunately today
I said that there would be no editorial comment.
[Translation]
The next question is on Motion No. 369. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour will
please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
5130
[English]
(The House divided on Motion No. 369, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Loubier
| Marchand
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Bakopanos
| Bennett
| Bertrand
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Bradshaw
| Bryden
|
Calder
| Casey
| Chan
| Clouthier
|
Cullen
| Cummins
| Davies
| DeVillers
|
Dion
| Doyle
| Earle
| Fry
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Herron
| Jackson
| Jennings
|
Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Keyes
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lastewka
| Lowther
| Lunn
|
Maloney
| Mark
| McNally
| Mifflin
|
Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proctor
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Wood – 50
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 369 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 370. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed to
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5135
(The House divided on Motion No. 370, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Crête
| Desrochers
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 20
|
NAYS
Members
Baker
| Bakopanos
| Bennett
| Bertrand
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Borotsik
| Bradshaw
|
Bryden
| Caccia
| Calder
| Casey
|
Chan
| Cullen
| Cummins
| Davies
|
DeVillers
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Herron
| Jackson
| Jennings
| Jordan
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Keyes
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Lastewka
| Lowther
| Lunn
| Maloney
|
Mark
| Mifflin
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Pratt
| Proctor
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Stinson
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Wood – 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 370 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Yvan Loubier: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. We have been
voting for thirty hours or so now. I just noticed a common
practice in this House, namely that the Chair first asks those
in favour of the motion to say yea or oui, and then those
opposed to say nay or non.
We realize that this practice gives an undue advantage to the no
side, since when we yell yea first, the no side can adjust the
level of decibels according to ours.
We were wondering whether, for the sake of justice, fairness,
and democracy—
Some hon. members: And clarity.
Mr. Yvan Loubier: —and for the sake of clarity so dear to our
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and distinguished
university professor, the Chair could start with those opposed
to the motion and then go to those in favour of the motion for
the remainder of the votes.
[English]
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): That is a novel
idea. Perhaps it is one that would have to go to procedure and
House affairs. I am having enough trouble keeping things
straight as it is. I will pay particular attention to the noes,
though.
5140
The question is on Motion No. 371. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 371, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guimond
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 21
|
NAYS
Members
Baker
| Bakopanos
| Bennett
| Bertrand
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Borotsik
| Bradshaw
|
Caccia
| Calder
| Casey
| Chan
|
Charbonneau
| Cullen
| Cummins
| Davies
|
DeVillers
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Dromisky
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Fry
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jackson
|
Jennings
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
|
Keyes
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lastewka
| Lowther
|
Lunn
| Maloney
| Mark
| McCormick
|
Mifflin
| Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Pettigrew
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proctor
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Solomon
| St - Julien
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Stinson
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Wood – 57
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 371 lost.
The question is on Motion No. 372. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5145
(The House divided on Motion No. 372, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
|
Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Crête
|
Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guimond
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 22
|
NAYS
Members
Baker
| Bakopanos
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
|
Borotsik
| Bradshaw
| Caccia
| Calder
|
Caplan
| Casey
| Chan
| Charbonneau
|
Clouthier
| Cummins
| Davies
| DeVillers
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Herron
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jackson
| Jennings
| Jordan
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Kenney
(Calgary Southeast)
| Keyes
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Lastewka
| Lowther
| Lunn
| Maloney
|
Mark
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McCormick
| Mifflin
|
Mitchell
| Myers
| Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
|
Pettigrew
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Provenzano
| Solomon
| St - Julien
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Stoffer
|
Torsney
| Wood – 58
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 372 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 373. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5150
(The House divided on Motion No. 373, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 23
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Baker
| Bakopanos
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Borotsik
| Bradshaw
| Caccia
| Caplan
|
Casey
| Chan
| Charbonneau
| Clouthier
|
Cummins
| Davies
| DeVillers
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
| Eggleton
|
Fry
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jackson
|
Jennings
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lastewka
| Lowther
| Lunn
|
Maloney
| Mark
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McCormick
| Mifflin
| Mitchell
| O'Reilly
|
Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Pettigrew
| Phinney
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Proctor
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Solomon
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Stinson
| Stoffer
| Torsney
| Wilfert – 56
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 373 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 374. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5155
(The House divided on Motion No. 374, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Baker
| Bakopanos
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Bradshaw
| Caccia
|
Caplan
| Casey
| Chan
| Charbonneau
|
Clouthier
| Cummins
| Davies
| DeVillers
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Fry
| Herron
| Jackson
|
Jennings
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lowther
| Lunn
| Maloney
|
Mark
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Mifflin
|
Mitchell
| O'Reilly
| Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
|
Pettigrew
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
|
Proctor
| Proulx
| Provenzano
| Saada
|
Solomon
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
|
Stoffer
| Torsney
| Wilfert – 55
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 374 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 375. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5200
(The House divided on Motion No. 375, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guimond
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 24
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
| Bakopanos
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Borotsik
| Bradshaw
|
Bulte
| Caccia
| Caplan
| Casey
|
Chan
| Charbonneau
| Clouthier
| Cummins
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Fry
| Herron
| Jackson
|
Jennings
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Lowther
| Lunn
| Maloney
| Mark
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
|
Mitchell
| Pagtakhan
| Pettigrew
| Phinney
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Saada
| Solomon
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney – 51
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 375 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 376. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 376, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lebel
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Plamondon
| Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 26
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
| Bakopanos
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Borotsik
| Bulte
|
Caccia
| Calder
| Caplan
| Casey
|
Chan
| Charbonneau
| Clouthier
| Cummins
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Folco
| Fry
| Herron
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jackson
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Keyes
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lowther
| Lunn
|
Maloney
| Mark
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mitchell
| Pagtakhan
|
Paradis
| Pettigrew
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Pratt
| Proulx
| Provenzano
| Solomon
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Wood – 54
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 376 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 377.
5205
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 377, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Plamondon
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 27
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
| Bakopanos
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Borotsik
| Caccia
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Casey
| Chan
|
Charbonneau
| Cummins
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Folco
|
Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jackson
| Keyes
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lowther
| Lunn
| Maloney
|
Mark
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McCormick
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mitchell
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
|
Pettigrew
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Proctor
|
Solomon
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Wood – 47
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 377 lost.
The question is on Motion No. 378. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5210
(The House divided on Motion No. 378, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Plamondon
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 28
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
| Bennett
|
Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Borotsik
| Bulte
|
Caccia
| Calder
| Caplan
| Casey
|
Chan
| Charbonneau
| Clouthier
| Cummins
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Folco
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Herron
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Keyes
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lowther
|
Lunn
| Maloney
| Mark
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mitchell
|
Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
| Pettigrew
|
Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pratt
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Provenzano
| Rock
| Sekora
|
Solomon
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
|
Stoffer
| Torsney
| Wilfert
| Wood
– 56
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 378 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 379. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5215
(The House divided on Motion No. 379, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Dumas
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 28
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Bulte
| Caccia
|
Calder
| Caplan
| Casey
| Chan
|
Charbonneau
| Clouthier
| Cummins
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
| Eggleton
|
Folco
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Herron
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lowther
|
Lunn
| Maloney
| Mark
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mitchell
| Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
|
Paradis
| Pettigrew
| Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
|
Pratt
| Proctor
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Rock
| Sekora
| Sgro
| Solomon
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Wilfert
– 55
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 379 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 380. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5220
(The House divided on Motion No. 380, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guay
| Guimond
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Plamondon
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 30
|
NAYS
Members
Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
| Bakopanos
|
Bennett
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Borotsik
|
Bulte
| Caccia
| Caplan
| Casey
|
Chan
| Charbonneau
| Clouthier
| Cummins
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Folco
| Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Keyes
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lowther
| Lunn
|
Maloney
| Mark
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
| Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
|
Paradis
| Pettigrew
| Phinney
| Pratt
|
Proctor
| Proulx
| Provenzano
| Rock
|
Sekora
| Sgro
| Shepherd
| Solomon
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Wilfert
| Wood – 60
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 380 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 381. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5225
(The House divided on Motion No. 381, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
| Lebel
|
Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
|
Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
|
Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 30
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
|
Bakopanos
| Bennett
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
|
Borotsik
| Bulte
| Caccia
| Caplan
|
Casey
| Catterall
| Chan
| Charbonneau
|
Clouthier
| Cummins
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Doyle
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Folco
|
Fry
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Harvard
| Herron
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Keyes
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lowther
| Lunn
|
Maloney
| Mark
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
| Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
|
Paradis
| Pettigrew
| Phinney
| Pratt
|
Proctor
| Proulx
| Provenzano
| Rock
|
Sekora
| Sgro
| Solomon
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Ur
| Whelan
| Wilfert
|
Wood
– 65
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 381 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 382. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5230
[Translation]
(The House divided on Motion No. 382, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Crête
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp – 29
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
|
Bakopanos
| Bennett
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
|
Borotsik
| Caccia
| Caplan
| Casey
|
Catterall
| Chan
| Charbonneau
| Cummins
|
Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Folco
| Fry
| Gagliano
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Harvard
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
|
Ianno
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lowther
| Lunn
| MacAulay
|
Maloney
| Mark
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
|
Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
| Pettigrew
|
Phinney
| Proctor
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Rock
| Sekora
| Sgro
| Solomon
|
St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Whelan
| Wilfert
| Wood – 63
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 382
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 383. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour of the
motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 383, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
| Crête
|
Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Dumas
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp – 28
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
|
Bélair
| Blondin - Andrew
| Bonin
| Borotsik
|
Caccia
| Casey
| Catterall
| Chan
|
Charbonneau
| Cummins
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Folco
| Fry
|
Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Harvard
| Herron
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
| Keyes
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Lowther
| Lunn
| MacAulay
| Maloney
|
Mark
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
|
Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
| Pettigrew
|
Phinney
| Proctor
| Richardson
| Sekora
|
Solomon
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Stinson
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Ur
| Whelan
| Wood – 55
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 383
lost.
5235
The next question is on Motion No. 384. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour of the
motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
5240
[English]
(The House divided on Motion No. 384, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Crête
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Dumas
| Fournier
| Girard - Bujold
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
|
Marceau
| Ménard
| Perron
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne
– 30
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
|
Bakopanos
| Bélair
| Bonin
| Borotsik
|
Caccia
| Cannis
| Casey
| Catterall
|
Charbonneau
| Cummins
| Dion
| Discepola
|
Dockrill
| Doyle
| Earle
| Eggleton
|
Folco
| Fry
| Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lowther
| MacAulay
| Maloney
|
Mark
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mitchell
|
Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
| Pettigrew
|
Phinney
| Proctor
| Sekora
| Shepherd
|
Solomon
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stinson
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Wood – 53
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 384 lost.
The question is on Motion No. 385. Is it the pleasure of the
House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5245
(The House divided on Motion No. 385, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
| Bergeron
|
Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
| Canuel
|
Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
|
Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Dumas
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
| Ménard
|
Perron
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 32
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
|
Bakopanos
| Bélair
| Bonin
| Borotsik
|
Caccia
| Cannis
| Casey
| Catterall
|
Cummins
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Folco
| Fry
|
Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
|
Keyes
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lowther
| Lunn
|
MacAulay
| Maloney
| Manley
| Mark
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Mitchell
| Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
|
Pettigrew
| Phinney
| Proctor
| Richardson
|
Sekora
| Sgro
| Shepherd
| Solomon
|
St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stinson
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Ur
| Wood – 56
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 385 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 386. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5250
(The House divided on Motion No. 386, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 41
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
|
Bélair
| Bonin
| Borotsik
| Caccia
|
Cannis
| Casey
| Catterall
| Chamberlain
|
Clouthier
| Cummins
| Dion
| Doyle
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Folco
| Fry
|
Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
|
Jennings
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Lowther
|
Lunn
| Malhi
| Maloney
| Manley
|
Mark
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Mitchell
| Myers
| Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
|
Paradis
| Pettigrew
| Phinney
| Proctor
|
Proulx
| Provenzano
| Richardson
| Sgro
|
Shepherd
| Solomon
| St. Denis
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stinson
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
|
Ur
| Whelan
| Wood – 59
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 386 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 387. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 387, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne – 41
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
|
Bélair
| Bennett
| Bonin
| Borotsik
|
Caccia
| Cannis
| Casey
| Catterall
|
Chamberlain
| Clouthier
| Cummins
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Doyle
| Dromisky
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Folco
| Fry
| Gagliano
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
|
Jennings
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Lowther
| MacAulay
| Malhi
| Maloney
|
Manley
| Mark
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McCormick
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
| Myers
| Pagtakhan
|
Paradis
| Pettigrew
| Phinney
| Proctor
|
Richardson
| Sgro
| Shepherd
| Solomon
|
St. Denis
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stinson
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Wood – 61
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No.
387 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 388.
5255
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 388, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne – 42
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
|
Bélair
| Bélanger
| Bennett
| Bonin
|
Borotsik
| Bradshaw
| Bulte
| Caccia
|
Cannis
| Casey
| Catterall
| Chamberlain
|
Clouthier
| Cummins
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Doyle
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Folco
| Fry
| Gagliano
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
|
Jennings
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Lowther
| MacAulay
| Malhi
| Maloney
|
Manley
| Mark
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McCormick
|
McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mitchell
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
|
Pettigrew
| Phinney
| Proctor
| Provenzano
|
Richardson
| Robillard
| Rock
| Sgro
|
Shepherd
| Solomon
| St. Denis
| Steckle
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stinson
| Stoffer
| Torsney
|
Ur
| Wood – 66
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 388 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 389.
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
5300
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5305
[Translation]
(The House divided on Motion No. 389, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne
– 40
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
|
Bélair
| Bennett
| Borotsik
| Bradshaw
|
Brown
| Bulte
| Caccia
| Cannis
|
Casey
| Catterall
| Chamberlain
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
|
Cummins
| Dion
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Earle
| Eggleton
|
Folco
| Fry
| Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
| Jennings
|
Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
| Lowther
|
Malhi
| Maloney
| Manley
| Mark
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Myers
|
O'Reilly
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
| Pettigrew
|
Phinney
| Provenzano
| Richardson
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Sgro
| Shepherd
| Solomon
|
St. Denis
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stoffer
|
Torsney
| Ur
| Whelan
| Wood – 64
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 389
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 390. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour of the
motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
5310
(The House divided on Motion No. 390, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne – 42
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Baker
| Bakopanos
|
Bélair
| Bennett
| Bonin
| Borotsik
|
Bradshaw
| Bulte
| Caccia
| Casey
|
Chamberlain
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Cummins
| Dion
|
Dockrill
| Doyle
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Folco
| Fry
|
Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
|
Jennings
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Konrad
| Lastewka
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Lowther
| Lunn
| Malhi
|
Maloney
| Manley
| Mark
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
|
Mitchell
| Myers
| O'Reilly
| Obhrai
|
Pagtakhan
| Paradis
| Pettigrew
| Phinney
|
Provenzano
| Richardson
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Sgro
| Shepherd
|
Solomon
| St. Denis
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stoffer
| Torsney
| Ur
| Wood – 72
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 390
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 391. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour of the
motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
5315
[English]
(The House divided on Motion No. 391, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bigras
| Canuel
| Cardin
|
Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
| de Savoye
| Debien
|
Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Dumas
|
Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
|
Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Turp
| Venne – 38
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bellemare
|
Bennett
| Borotsik
| Bradshaw
| Bulte
|
Caccia
| Casey
| Chamberlain
| Chan
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Cummins
| Dion
| Dockrill
|
Doyle
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Eggleton
| Folco
| Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jennings
| Jordan
|
Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Konrad
|
Lastewka
| Leung
| Lincoln
| Lowther
|
Malhi
| Maloney
| Manley
| Mark
|
Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Mitchell
| Myers
| O'Reilly
|
Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
| Peric
|
Pettigrew
| Phinney
| Provenzano
| Richardson
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Sekora
| Sgro
|
Shepherd
| Solomon
| St. Denis
| Steckle
|
Stinson
| Stoffer
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Wood – 73
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No.
391 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 392. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5320
(The House divided on Motion No. 392, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 41
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Bakopanos
|
Bélair
| Bellemare
| Bennett
| Borotsik
|
Bradshaw
| Bulte
| Caccia
| Casey
|
Chamberlain
| Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
|
Cummins
| Dion
| Doyle
| Dromisky
|
Duhamel
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Folco
|
Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
|
Ianno
| Jennings
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Keyes
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Konrad
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Lowther
| Lunn
| Malhi
|
Maloney
| Manley
| Mark
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Matthews
| McCormick
| Mifflin
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Myers
| Nault
| Obhrai
|
Pagtakhan
| Paradis
| Peric
| Pettigrew
|
Phinney
| Provenzano
| Richardson
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Shepherd
|
Solomon
| St. Denis
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
|
Stinson
| Stoffer
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Wood – 73
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No.
392 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 393. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5325
(The House divided on Motion No. 393, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Turp
|
Venne – 37
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bakopanos
| Beaumier
|
Bellemare
| Bennett
| Borotsik
| Bradshaw
|
Bulte
| Cannis
| Casey
| Chamberlain
|
Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
| Cummins
|
Dion
| Doyle
| Dromisky
| Duhamel
|
Earle
| Eggleton
| Folco
| Gagliano
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
|
Ianno
| Jennings
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Keyes
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Konrad
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Longfield
| Lowther
| Lunn
|
Malhi
| Maloney
| Manley
| Mark
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Matthews
| McCormick
| Mifflin
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Murray
| Myers
| Nault
|
Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Peric
| Pettigrew
|
Phinney
| Provenzano
| Richardson
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Shepherd
|
Solomon
| Speller
| St. Denis
| Steckle
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Stoffer
| Szabo
|
Torsney
| Ur
| Wood – 75
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No.
393 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 394. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those is favour
of the motion please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed to
the motion will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5330
(The House divided on Motion No. 394, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marceau
| Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
|
Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
|
Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne – 42
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Baker
| Bakopanos
|
Beaumier
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Bennett
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Bradshaw
| Bulte
|
Caccia
| Cannis
| Casey
| Chamberlain
|
Chan
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
| Coderre
|
Cummins
| DeVillers
| Dion
| Doyle
|
Dromisky
| Earle
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Folco
| Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Ianno
| Jennings
|
Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
|
Konrad
| Lastewka
| Leung
| Lincoln
|
Longfield
| Lowther
| Lunn
| Malhi
|
Maloney
| Manley
| Mark
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
Matthews
| McCormick
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
|
Murray
| Myers
| Nault
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
|
O'Reilly
| Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Parrish
|
Peric
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Proulx
|
Provenzano
| Richardson
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Shepherd
|
Solomon
| Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
|
Steckle
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Ur
| Wood
– 88
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No.
394 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 395. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour
of the motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed
will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the
nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5335
[Translation]
(The House divided on Motion No. 395, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne
– 41
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Bakopanos
| Beaumier
|
Bélair
| Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Bennett
|
Borotsik
| Bradshaw
| Bryden
| Bulte
|
Caccia
| Cannis
| Casey
| Chamberlain
|
Chan
| Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
|
Coderre
| Cummins
| DeVillers
| Dion
|
Doyle
| Dromisky
| Earle
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Folco
| Gagliano
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Harvard
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
|
Jennings
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
|
Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Konrad
| Lastewka
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Lowther
| Lunn
| Maloney
|
Manley
| Mark
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Matthews
|
McCormick
| Mifflin
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Murray
|
Nault
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
| O'Reilly
| Obhrai
|
Pagtakhan
| Parrish
| Peric
| Peterson
|
Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
| Proulx
| Provenzano
|
Richardson
| Robillard
| Rock
| Saada
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Sgro
| Shepherd
|
Solomon
| Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
|
Steckle
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Torsney
| Ur
| Vanclief
|
Whelan
| Wood – 90
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 395
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 396. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour of the
motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
5340
(The House divided on Motion No. 396, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne – 41
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bélair
|
Bélanger
| Bellemare
| Bennett
| Borotsik
|
Bradshaw
| Bryden
| Bulte
| Caccia
|
Cannis
| Casey
| Chamberlain
| Chan
|
Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
| Coderre
|
Cummins
| DeVillers
| Dion
| Doyle
|
Dromisky
| Earle
| Eggleton
| Folco
|
Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Gray
(Windsor West)
|
Harvard
| Herron
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Jennings
|
Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Konrad
|
Lastewka
| Leung
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
Lowther
| Lunn
| Malhi
| Maloney
|
Manley
| Mark
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Matthews
|
McCormick
| Mifflin
| Murray
| Nault
|
O'Brien
(Labrador)
| O'Reilly
| Obhrai
| Parrish
|
Peric
| Peterson
| Pettigrew
| Pillitteri
|
Provenzano
| Richardson
| Robillard
| Rock
|
Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Sgro
|
Shepherd
| Solomon
| Speller
| St. Denis
|
St - Julien
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Torsney
| Vanclief
|
Whelan
| Wilfert
| Wood – 87
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): I declare Motion No. 396
lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 397. Is it the pleasure of
the House to adopt the motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those in favour of the
motion will please say yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): All those opposed will
please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland): In my opinion the nays have
it.
And more than five members having risen:
5345
[English]
(The House divided on Motion No. 397, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
|
Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
| Gagnon
|
Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Lalonde
| Laurin
| Lebel
| Marceau
|
Marchand
| Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
|
Venne – 41
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Bennett
| Bertrand
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Boudria
| Bradshaw
|
Brown
| Bryden
| Bulte
| Caccia
|
Calder
| Cannis
| Caplan
| Casey
|
Cauchon
| Chamberlain
| Chan
| Charbonneau
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Cullen
| Cummins
| DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
|
Dion
| Discepola
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Dromisky
| Drouin
| Earle
| Easter
|
Eggleton
| Finlay
| Folco
| Fry
|
Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Goodale
|
Gray
(Windsor West)
| Harvard
| Harvey
| Herron
|
Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Hubbard
| Ianno
| Jackson
|
Jennings
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Knutson
| Konrad
|
Lastewka
| Leung
| Lincoln
| Longfield
|
Lowther
| Lunn
| MacAulay
| Malhi
|
Maloney
| Manley
| Mark
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
|
Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Matthews
| McCormick
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Mifflin
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Minna
| Mitchell
|
Murray
| Myers
| Nault
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
|
O'Reilly
| Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
|
Parrish
| Peric
| Peterson
| Pettigrew
|
Phinney
| Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pillitteri
| Pratt
|
Proud
| Proulx
| Provenzano
| Redman
|
Richardson
| Robillard
| Rock
| Saada
|
Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
| Sgro
| Shepherd
|
Solomon
| Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
|
Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
|
Stoffer
| Szabo
| Ur
| Vanclief
|
Whelan
| Wilfert
| Wood – 131
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 397 lost.
[Translation]
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.
I simply want to draw to your attention and that of all the
members of this House that the hon. member for Charlevoix has
been present in the House since the beginning of the votes, on
Monday evening. I salute him on my behalf and on behalf of my
colleagues for doing this.
Some hon. members: Hear, hear.
[English]
The Speaker: The next question is on Motion No. 398.
5355
(The House divided on Motion No. 398, which was negatived on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
| Crête
|
Cummins
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
|
Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Dumas
| Fournier
|
Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
|
Guimond
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Konrad
| Lalonde
|
Laurin
| Lebel
| Loubier
| Lowther
|
Lunn
| Marceau
| Marchand
| Mark
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Obhrai
| Perron
|
Picard
(Drummond)
| Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
|
St - Hilaire
| Stinson
| Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
|
Turp
| Venne – 50
|
NAYS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Bennett
| Bertrand
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Boudria
| Bradshaw
|
Brison
| Brown
| Bryden
| Bulte
|
Caccia
| Calder
| Cannis
| Caplan
|
Casey
| Cauchon
| Chamberlain
| Chan
|
Charbonneau
| Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
| Coderre
|
Collenette
| Cullen
| DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
|
Dion
| Discepola
| Dockrill
| Doyle
|
Dromisky
| Drouin
| Duhamel
| Earle
|
Easter
| Eggleton
| Finlay
| Folco
|
Fry
| Gagliano
| Godfrey
| Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
|
Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Harvard
| Harvey
|
Herron
| Hubbard
| Ianno
| Jackson
|
Jennings
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
| Keyes
|
Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Knutson
| Leung
|
Lincoln
| Longfield
| MacAulay
| Malhi
|
Maloney
| Manley
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
|
Matthews
| McCormick
| McGuire
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
|
Mifflin
| Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Minna
| Mitchell
|
Murray
| Myers
| Nault
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
|
O'Reilly
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
| Parrish
|
Peric
| Peterson
| Pettigrew
| Phinney
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pillitteri
| Pratt
| Proud
|
Proulx
| Provenzano
| Redman
| Richardson
|
Robillard
| Rock
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Sgro
| Shepherd
| Solomon
| Speller
|
St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Steckle
| Stewart
(Brant)
|
Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stoffer
| Szabo
| Telegdi
|
Torsney
| Ur
| Vanclief
| Whelan
|
Wilfert
| Wood – 126
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare Motion No. 398 lost.
[Translation]
Hon. Stéphane Dion (President of the Queen's Privy Council for
Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, Lib.) moved
that the bill be concurred in.
The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the
motion?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
Some hon. members: No.
The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will please say
yea.
Some hon. members: Yea.
The Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay.
Some hon. members: Nay.
The Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it.
And more than five members having risen:
5405
[English]
Mr. Scott Brison: Mr. Speaker, I want to clarify
something. I inadvertently voted, perhaps because of voting
fatigue, with the government on this legislation. I want to make
it very clear that I remain fundamentally opposed to the
legislation. I voted against the legislation and I continue to
be opposed to it.
The Speaker: You voted against.
(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the
following division:)
YEAS
Members
Assadourian
| Augustine
| Axworthy
| Baker
|
Bakopanos
| Beaumier
| Bélair
| Bélanger
|
Bellemare
| Bennett
| Bertrand
| Blondin - Andrew
|
Bonin
| Borotsik
| Boudria
| Bradshaw
|
Brown
| Bryden
| Bulte
| Caccia
|
Calder
| Cannis
| Caplan
| Casey
|
Cauchon
| Chamberlain
| Chan
| Charbonneau
|
Chrétien
(Saint - Maurice)
| Clouthier
| Coderre
| Collenette
|
Cullen
| Cummins
| DeVillers
| Dhaliwal
|
Dion
| Discepola
| Doyle
| Dromisky
|
Drouin
| Duhamel
| Easter
| Eggleton
|
Finlay
| Folco
| Fry
| Gagliano
|
Godfrey
| Goodale
| Gray
(Windsor West)
| Guarnieri
|
Harvard
| Hill
(Prince George – Peace River)
| Hubbard
| Ianno
|
Jackson
| Jennings
| Jordan
| Karetak - Lindell
|
Keyes
| Kilger
(Stormont – Dundas – Charlottenburgh)
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Knutson
|
Konrad
| Lastewka
| Leung
| Lincoln
|
Longfield
| Lowther
| Lunn
| MacAulay
|
Mahoney
| Malhi
| Maloney
| Manley
|
Mark
| Martin
(LaSalle – Émard)
| Martin
(Winnipeg Centre)
| Matthews
|
McCormick
| McGuire
| McLellan
(Edmonton West)
| Mifflin
|
Mills
(Broadview – Greenwood)
| Minna
| Mitchell
| Murray
|
Myers
| Nault
| O'Brien
(Labrador)
| O'Reilly
|
Obhrai
| Pagtakhan
| Paradis
| Parrish
|
Peric
| Peterson
| Pettigrew
| Phinney
|
Pickard
(Chatham – Kent Essex)
| Pillitteri
| Pratt
| Proud
|
Proulx
| Redman
| Richardson
| Robillard
|
Rock
| Saada
| Scott
(Fredericton)
| Sekora
|
Serré
| Sgro
| Shepherd
| Solomon
|
Speller
| St. Denis
| St - Julien
| Steckle
|
Stewart
(Brant)
| Stewart
(Northumberland)
| Stinson
| Stoffer
|
Szabo
| Telegdi
| Torsney
| Ur
|
Vanclief
| Whelan
| Wilfert
| Wood – 132
|
NAYS
Members
Alarie
| Asselin
| Bachand
(Saint - Jean)
| Bellehumeur
|
Bergeron
| Bernier
(Bonaventure – Gaspé – Îles - de - la - Madeleine – Pabok)
| Bigras
| Brien
|
Brison
| Canuel
| Cardin
| Chrétien
(Frontenac – Mégantic)
|
Crête
| de Savoye
| Debien
| Desrochers
|
Dockrill
| Dubé
(Lévis - et - Chutes - de - la - Chaudière)
| Duceppe
| Dumas
|
Earle
| Fournier
| Gagnon
| Girard - Bujold
|
Godin
(Acadie – Bathurst)
| Godin
(Châteauguay)
| Guay
| Guimond
|
Harvey
| Herron
| Lalonde
| Laurin
|
Lebel
| Loubier
| Marceau
| Marchand
|
Ménard
| Mercier
| Perron
| Picard
(Drummond)
|
Plamondon
| Rocheleau
| Sauvageau
| St - Hilaire
|
Tremblay
(Lac - Saint - Jean)
| Tremblay
(Rimouski – Mitis)
| Turp
| Venne – 48
|
PAIRED
Members
Anderson
| Hoeppner
| Kilgour
(Edmonton Southeast)
| Nunziata
|
The Speaker: I declare the motion agreed to.
(Motion agreed to)
The Speaker: It being 6.07 a.m., March 15, this House
stands adjourned until 2 p.m. later this day pursuant to Standing
Order 24(1).
(The House adjourned at 6.07 a.m.)