National Recovery Strategy

For the

 

 

 

North Pacific Right Whale

Eubalaena japonica

 

in

Pacific Canadian Waters

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Miriam O and John Ford

 

Draft (September, 2003)

 

 

 

 

 


 

Historical distribution from offshore whaling data (1785-1913) show that right whales were present in BC waters from April to October (Townsend 1935, Scarff 1986, Brownell et al. 2001, Clapham et al. in review), possibly feeding or migrating to or from sub-tropical calving grounds.  However, due to insufficient data, it is not possible to describe the current distribution of this species in Canada.  Only seven right whales were taken by BC whalers (1900-1951), who worked mainly in coastal waters (Table 1).  The last right whale sighting in BC waters was in 1970 from a Japanese scoutboat west of the Queen Charlotte Islands (Wada 1975).

The biology and ecology of the North Pacific right whale is poorly known.  It is unclear how many individuals exist and the location of the calving grounds is not known (Brownell et al. 2001). Whaling records from the 1800s show that right whales were once plentiful across much of the North Pacific (Maury 1852, Maury 1853, Townsend 1935, Scarff 1986, Scarff 1991, Brownell et al. 2001).  Although there is little information on pre-exploitation abundance of North Pacific right whales, the population size has been estimated to have been more than 11,000 animals (NMFS 1991), and perhaps much more (Scarff (2001).    At this time, it is impossible to produce a reliable estimate of abundance for the North Pacific right whale or to know population trends, since virtually nothing is known about population numbers, seasonal distribution or movements.

Although right whales were the first whales to be protected internationally (first in 1935) and later by the International Whaling Commission (Scarff 1986, Donovan 1992), the northern hemisphere species have shown very few signs of recovery after being hunted extensively. 

The Recovery Team identified threats and knowledge gaps that should be addressed to improve the chances of recovery for North Pacific right whales.  The primary factor affecting to the survival of the North Pacific right whale is likely small population numbers. Additional threats include increased marine traffic and ship strikes; entanglement in fishing gear; habitat degradation; noise; climate change and food supply; and pollution.  Identified knowledge gaps are population structure and genetics; life history parameters and population dynamics; current presence, abundance, distribution, migratory behaviour and habitat use in BC waters; and clarification of threats and human influences.

The goal of this recovery strategy is to increase the probability of survival for the North Pacific right whale in Canadian waters and maintain long-term viability of the population.  To achieve the goal of the North Pacific right whale recovery strategy, the Recovery Team identified that all of the following objectives should be met:

·        Gather baseline data on presence, occurrence, abundance and habitat to support recovery efforts.

·        Obtain better information on potential threats to North Pacific right whales that frequent Canadian waters and the effectiveness of strategies to mitigate these impacts.

·        Develop and implement tasks or programs to reduce impacts from human activities on the population of right whales that frequent BC waters.

·        Conduct long-term monitoring of the status of North Pacific right whales and evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation strategies.

·        Contribute to bilateral and multilateral cooperative efforts to conserve and recover the North Pacific right whale.

·        Raise awareness and understanding of the status of and threats to North Pacific right whales, and engage Canadians in supporting national and international recovery efforts.

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Executive Summary

List of Tables

Table of Figures

 

1.         INTRODUCTION

 

2.         BACKGROUND

2.1       Current Status

2.2       Distribution

2.2.1       Global range

2.2.2       Canadian range

2.3       Nationally significant populations

2.4       Population Sizes and Trends

 

3.         Factors affecting vulnerability and contributing to  threatened status  

3.1       Habitat Requirements

3.1.1       Survival and Recovery Habitat

3.2       Ecological Role

3.3       Biologically Limiting Factors

3.3.1       K-selected Species

3.3.2       Critically Low Numbers

3.3.3       Food Supply

3.4       Historic Threats

3.4.1       Subsistence/Native Harvest

3.4.2       Commercial whaling

3.5       Current Threats

3.5.1       Population Numbers and Genetic Diversity (inbreeding depression)

3.5.2       Marine Traffic and Ship Strikes

3.5.3       Entanglement in Fishing Gear

3.5.4       Habitat Degradation

3.5.5       Noise

3.5.6       Climate Change and Food Supply

3.5.7       Pollution

3.5.8       Depensation (Allee effect)

3.6       Socio-economic Considerations

3.7       Knowledge Gaps

3.7.1       Population structure, genetics

3.7.2       Life history parameters, population dynamics

3.7.3       Current presence, abundance, distribution, and habitat use in BC waters

3.7.4       Clarification of threats, human influences

 

4.         RECOVERY

4.1       Recovery Goal

4.2       Recovery Objectives

4.3       Recovery Strategies

Scientific Research

Threats Research

Mitigation and Protection

Monitoring and Evaluation

Coordination

Education and Awareness

4.4       Considerations for Recovery:

4.4.1       Ecological and technical feasibility of species recovery

4.4.2       Anticipated Conflicts or Challenges

4.4.3       Recommended Approach / Scale for Recovery

 

5.         Actions Already Completed or Underway

5.1       Research in Canada

5.1.1       Pacific Canada

5.1.2       Atlantic Canada

5.2       Legal Protection

5.3       Listing Status

5.3.1       Status in Canada

5.3.2       Status in the US

5.3.3       International Status

5.4       Recovery Strategies

5.5       North Pacific Right Whale Recovery Team

 

6.         action plans

 

7.         Potential Management Impacts for Other Species OR Ecological Processes

 

8.         Evaluation

 

9.         References Cited

 

10.       ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

10.1    Recovery Team Members

10.2    External Peer Reviewers

 

11.       RECORD OF CONSULTATION

 

 


 

 

Table 1.  Right whale sightings/catches in British Columbia waters, 1900-2002

 

Table 2.  Right whale sightings/catches in waters adjacent to Canadian waters, 1900-2002

 

Table 3.  Offshore right whale sightings/catches, 1900-2002

 

 

 

Figure 1. Map of historical right whale catches in the eastern North Pacific from logbook records of American whaleships (replicated from Townsend 1935). The dot colour represents month of catch

 

Figure 2. Right whale sightings/catches in British Columbia waters and in US waters adjacent to the Canadian border, 1900-2002.  Note that 1) coordinates were not found for the catches positioned at whaling stations, and 2) the range of coordinates for the 1970 Wada sighting are too broad to plot on this map

 


1.         INTRODUCTION

 

The North Pacific right whale, Eubalaena japonica (Lacepede 1818; Rosenbaum et al. 2000b), is a large, robust baleen whale.  All of the right whale species have similar physical descriptions.  Adults can reach up to 18 metres in length, and may weigh over 100 metric tons (Kenney 2002).  Females are larger than males, and newborns are 4.5 to 6 metres long at birth (Kenney 2002).  Right whales are distinguished by a stocky body, black colouration, lack of a dorsal fin, a large rostrum (about ¼ of the body length), strongly bowed lower lip, sometimes with white patches on their ventral surface, and callosities on the head region (Perry et al. 1999).  These callosities are irregular patches of thickened, keratinized tissue, which can be inhabited by dense populations of specialized amphipod crustaceans, known as cyamids (Kenney 2002).  Two rows of long (up to about 2.5 m in length); dark baleen plates hang from the upper jaw, with about 225 plates on each side.  The tail is very broad, deeply notched, and all black with a smooth trailing edge.  They have a distinct V shaped blow, upwards of 5 metres in height.  Right whales lack elastic throats, unlike other baleen whales that have pleated, elastic throats used to gulp food consisting of large krill or fish.  The right whale feeds almost exclusively on copepods (Calanus spp.), which are gathered by moving through dense patches of these organisms with their huge mouths open.  Typical feeding dives last for 10-20 minutes (Kenney 2002).

No significant morphological differences have been documented between right whales in the North Atlantic, Southern Oceans, and the North Pacific.  However, recent genetic studies indicate that there are three distinct species with complete and long-established isolation (Kenney 2002).  The Southern right whale has long been recognized as a separate species, E. australis.  Genetic data show that the North Pacific right whale is more closely related to southern right whales than to those in the North Atlantic (Rosenbaum et al. 2000a).  Based on this genetic evidence, the International Whaling Commission, the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service, and many other authorities recommend that the three populations be considered as separate species.  In this report, North Pacific right whales are referred to as E. japonica, North Atlantic whales are referred to as E. glacialis; and Southern Hemisphere right whales are referred to as E. australis.  Note, however, that in most of the past scientific literature, North Pacific right whales are referred to as E. glacialis japonica.

Basic aspects of the biology and ecology of the North Pacific right whale remain poorly known.  The size of the population is not precisely known, and the location of the calving grounds are not known (Brownell et al. 2001). Whaling records from the 1800s show that right whales were once plentiful across much of the North Pacific (Maury 1852, Maury 1853, Townsend 1935, Scarff 1986, Scarff 1991; Brownell et al. 2001).  Concentrations were present in waters around Japan, the Okhotsk Sea, the Kuril Islands, Kamchatka, the Aleutian Islands and southeastern Bering Sea, and the ‘Northwest Ground’ in the Gulf of Alaska (Brownell et al. 2001).

Right whales were once hunted extensively by commercial whalers.  They are large, slow swimming, tend to congregate, and their thick layer of blubber usually prevents them from sinking when killed, but many did in fact sink before they could be flensed (Scarff 2001).  These attributes made them an easy and profitable species for early whalers, recording total mortalities estimated at between 26,500 and 37,000 right whales in the North Pacific (Scarff 2001).  These were the first whales to be protected internationally (in 1935) (although that protection was only partial since neither Japan nor the Soviet Union signed the Convention), and later by the International Whaling Commission in 1946 (Scarff 1986, Donovan, 1992).   However, legal “research whaling” and illegal Soviet Union whaling (which continued into the 1960s) likely pushed the eastern population of North Pacific right whales close to extinction, when at least 372 individuals were killed (Doroshenko 2000, Brownell et al. 2001). Although they were among the first to be protected internationally, the Northern hemisphere right whales are still among the rarest of large whales (IWC 2001). 

 

 

2.1       Current Status  

 

Common name:                    North Pacific right whale

Scientific name:                    Eubalaena japonica

Assessment summary:         April 1987

COSEWIC status:                 Endangered

Reason for designation:       A rarely seen baleen whale in BC waters.  Once highly prized by commercial whalers, right whales appear to represent an extreme example of the inability of whale stocks to recover from severe depletion.  There is very little known about the abundance and distribution of these baleen whales.

Occurrence in Canada:        North Pacific

Status history:                        Endangered status originally assigned by COSEWIC April 1980 (Hay 1985).  Endangered status reaffirmed April 1985, 1987 (Gaskin 1987) and 1991 (Gaskin 1991).

2.2       Distribution

2.2.1   Global range 

Whaling records indicate that right whales in the North Pacific ranged across the entire North Pacific, from the western coast of North America to the Russian Far East (Scarff 1986, Scarff 1991, Brownell et al. 2001, Clapham et al. In review).  Before right whales in the North Pacific were heavily exploited by commercial whalers, concentrations were found in the Gulf of Alaska, eastern Aleutian Islands, southcentral Bering Sea, Sea of Okhotsk, and Sea of Japan and offshore waters across much of the North Pacific (Braham and Rice 1984, Scarff 1991, Clapham et al. in review).  Post-exploitation distribution is much more restricted.  Post-whaling sightings have been reported as far south as central Baja California in the eastern North Pacific, as far south as Hawaii in the central North Pacific and as far north as the sub-Arctic waters of the Bering Sea and Sea of Okhotsk in the summer (Herman et al. 1980, Berzin and Doroshenko 1982, NMFS 1991).

There are very few data on the current summering and wintering grounds of the North Pacific right whale.  In the western North Pacific, feeding areas have been found in the Okhotsk Sea and along the Kuril and Kamchatka coasts (Brownell et al. 2001).  Gaskin (1987) pointed out that whaling data assembled by Nemoto (1957, 1959, and 1962) and Gaskin (1976) suggest that most remaining eastern North Pacific right whales gather together in summer on the southeastern shelf of the Bering Sea, around the eastern Aleutian Islands, and Kodiak Island.  Further studies of historical concentrations and some recent summer sightings indicate that the Bering Sea and Gulf of Alaska may contain important feeding grounds (Scarff 1986, Scarff 1991, Goddard and Rugh 1998, Moore et al. 2000, Brownell et al. 2001, Clapham et al. in review).

North Atlantic and Southern right whales generally calve in very shallow coastal temperate to sub-tropical waters during the winter months. The western population of North Atlantic right whales calve off southeastern USA during the winter months (Kraus et al. 1986).  Calving grounds for Southern right whales have been reported in the near-shore waters of the Auckland Islands (Patenaude and Baker 2001), Campbell Island (Stewart and Todd 2001), Peninsula Valdez (Rowntree et al. 2001), southern Brazil (de Oliveira Santos et al. 2001) and Namibia (Roux et al. 2001).  In the western North Pacific, various calving areas have been proposed, including the Ryukyu Islands (Omura 1986), the Yellow Sea (Tomilin 1957), the Sea of Japan (Omura 1986) and offshore waters far from land (Scarff 1991).  The calving/wintering grounds of the eastern North Pacific right whale are unknown.  However, scattered reports exist of right whales seen off Washington, northern Oregon, California and Hawaii during winter months (Scarff 1986, Gaskin 1987).

Migratory patterns of the North Pacific right whale are unknown, although in other oceans right whales generally spend the summer on high-latitude feeding grounds and migrate to more temperate waters during the winter (Braham and Rice 1984).  They are found across a wide range of latitudes during both summer and winter, which is evidence of a staggered migration (Scarff 1991, cited in Brownell et al. 2001).  This seasonal movement is also evident in monthly plots of 20th century and historical records (Clapham et al. in review).  It is important to stress that very few sightings exist, and because of low population numbers little is known about the current distribution of North Pacific right whales.

2.2.2       Canadian range

 

Historical concentrations from offshore whaling data (1785-1913) show that right whales were present in BC waters from April to October (Townsend 1935, Clapham et al. in review), possibly feeding or migrating to or from sub-tropical calving grounds (Figure 1).  Due to insufficient data, it is not possible to describe the current distribution of this species in Canada.  Only seven right whales were taken by BC whalers, who worked mainly in coastal waters (Figure 2).  The last confirmed right whale sighting that may have been in BC waters was in 1970 from a Japanese scoutboat west of the Queen Charlotte Islands (Table 1) (Wada 1975). However, due to the range of coordinates given for this sighting, there is a low probability that it occurred in BC waters.  An unconfirmed right whale sighting also exists in BC waters at the mouth of Juan de Fuca Strait in 1983 (Table 1) (Reeves and Leatherwood 1985).

 

Figure 1. Map of historical right whale catches in the eastern North Pacific from logbook records of American whaleships (replicated from Townsend 1935). The dot colour represents month of catch.

Table 1.  Right whale sightings/catches in British Columbia waters, 1900-2002.

 

DATE

LOCATION

NUMBER

REFERENCE

June, 1914

Naden Harbour

(no coordinates)

1

Nichol et al. 2002

June, 1918

Rose Harbour

(no coordinates)

1

Nichol et al. 2002

June 15, 1924

Naden Harbour

(54°35 N, 133°55 W)

1

Nichol et al. 2002

June 24, 1924

Naden Harbour

(54°05 N, 133°40 W)

1

Nichol et al. 2002

June 10, 1926

Naden Harbour

(53°40 N, 133°45 W)

1

Pike and MacAskie 1969

June 10, 1929

Rose Harbour

(no coordinates)

1

Nichol et al. 2002

July 18, 1951

Coal Harbour

(50° N, 128° W)

1

Pike and MacAskie 1969

1970

W of Queen Charlotte Islands

(50-55° N, 130-140° W)

2

Wada 1975

1983

Juan de Fuca Strait

(48° 33 N, 124° 39 W)

2

Reeves and Leatherwood 1985 ††

  Due to the range of coordinates given for this sighting, there is a low probability that this sighting occurred in BC waters.

†† This is an unconfirmed sighting.

 

An additional three sightings of seven animals were recorded in US waters near the B.C./Washington border (Table 2, Figure 2). The proximity of these sightings to Canadian waters is important, suggesting that these animals may be using similar habitats in Canadian waters.

 

Table 2. Right whale sightings/catches in waters adjacent to Canadian waters, 1900-2002.

DATE

LOCATION

NUMBER

REFERENCE

April 8, 1959

SW of Grays Harbour, Washington

(45°55 N, 125°25 W)

3

Fiscus and Niggol 1965

January 17, 1967

W of Cape Flaherty, Washington

(48°20 N, 125°06 W)

3

Rice and Fiscus 1968

May 24, 1992

NW of Grays Harbour, Washington

(47°17 N, 125°11 W)

1

Rowlett et al. 1994

 

 

Figure 2. Right whale sightings/catches in British Columbia waters and in US waters adjacent to the Canadian border, 1900-2002.  Note that 1) coordinates were not found for the catches positioned at whaling stations, and 2) the range of coordinates for the 1970 Wada sighting are too broad to plot on this map.

 

Twenty right whales were caught in Alaskan waters by the American Pacific Whaling Company from 1917 to 1939 (Brueggeman et al. 1985, Reeves et al. 1985).  The Akutan Island whaling station, at the western end of the Aleutians, reported catching nine right whales between 1917 and 1939.  Closer to BC waters, the Port Hobron whaling station on Kodiak Island caught 11 animals between 1926 and 1932.  More recently, there have been between 4-13 right whales seen in the Southeast Bering Sea (see section 2.4), and a few sightings off Kodiak Island and southwest of Chirikov Island (K. Wynne, University of Alaska Fairbanks and J. Anderson, Master CCGS John P.Tully, pers. comm.).  However, the locations of these catches and sightings are too far to be considered adjacent to BC waters.  

 

Between 1958 and 1977, only seven offshore records exist (i.e. outside the 200 mile limit to 145° W) (Table 3).

 

Table 3.  Offshore right whale sightings/catches, 1900-2002.

 

DATE

LOCATION

NUMBER

REFERENCE

Post-1958?

50° N, 145° W

2

Pike and MacAskie 1969

1963

51° N, 145° W

200

Berzin and Doroshenko1982 (cited in Brownell et al. 2001)

1973

45-50° N, 140-150° W

1

Wada 1975

1974

40-50° N, 140-160° W

1

Anonymous 1976

1975

40-45° N, 140-150° W

2

Wada 1977

1977

40-50° N, 140-145° W

1

Wada 1979

1977

45-50° N, 135-140° W

2

Wada 1979

 

Note : Berzin and Rovnin (1966) report 200 in all eastern North Pacific in 1963, and no large sightings are seen near this location in their figures (Brownell et al. 2001).

 

Waters off of BC, Washington, Oregon, and California have been suggested as remnant wintering grounds for right whales (Gilmore 1956).  Historical whaling information also supports coastal waters off BC as important habitat for feeding and migration.

 

2.2.3   Percent of Global Distribution in Canada

Again, due to insufficient data, it is not possible to estimate the proportion of this species’ global distribution or population abundance currently found in Canada.

2.3       Nationally significant populations

 

The historical population structure for right whales in the North Pacific is not clear. Figure 1, replicated from Townsend (1935), shows the historical whaling data for right whales in the eastern North Pacific from logbook records of American whaleships.  Scarff (1991) notes that the apparent discrete populations of right whales in the eastern and western North Pacific reflected in the Townsend charts is largely an artifact of the non-random distribution of whalers in the North Pacific and their concentration on the eastern (Gulf of Alaska “Northwest Ground’) and western (Kamchatka/Sea of Okhostk) areas. The more extensive sighting data shown in the Maury charts that can be adjusted for whaling effort suggests a more continuous distribution of right whales east to west across the North Pacific (Scarff 1991). Although a continuous distribution may be evident in these charts, twentieth century sightings support the two population hypothesis (Brownell et al. 2001).

Presently, there appears to be a minimum of two populations in the North Pacific, at least with regard to concentrations on feeding grounds—one in the east and one in the west, with the possibility that the western group may occur in two separate sub-populations (Klumov 1962, cited in Brownell et al. 2001).  However, this division of populations is not conclusive. Kenney (2001) argues that there are insufficient genetic or resighting data to support this separation.  Nevertheless, the majority of literature supports distinct western and eastern right whale populations, and therefore this report does so as well. 

What information exists on the eastern population is summarized by Brownell et al. (2001) and Clapham (in press).  The degree of genetic exchange between the two populations in high latitudes or on a possible offshore breeding ground is unknown (Brownell et al. 2001).  If genetic exchange does indeed exist on a common breeding ground, then a decline in genetic diversity for either population could affect the survival of the entire species.

2.4       Population Sizes and Trends

 

The pre-exploitation abundance of North Pacific right whales has been estimated to be more than 11,000 animals (NMFS 1991), and perhaps twice that number (Scarff 2001).  Among the large whales, Northern hemisphere right whales have shown the least signs of recovery following depletion due to commercial whaling.  Because so little is currently known about this population, it is impossible to produce a reliable estimate of abundance for the North Pacific right whale or to know population trends at this time.  Most estimates appear speculative, based upon general patterns of sightings (e.g. Berzin and Yabokov 1978, Braham and Rice 1984, Berzin and Vladimirov 1989, Vladimirov 1994, Vladimirov 2000, cited in Brownell et al. 2001).  And even the most quantitative studies (e.g. Ohsumi and Wada 1974, Miyashita and Kato 1998) have problems of high variance in their estimates of abundance due to extrapolations from small sample sizes to large areas (Brownell et al. 2001).  This problem has been attributed to the difficulty of accurately counting small populations of whales dispersed over wide geographical areas (Gaskin 1987).

North Pacific right whales almost certainly do not number more than those found in the western North Atlantic (~300) (IWC 1998), with most of these animals occurring in the western North Pacific.  The western population is little studied but may be growing (Miyashita and Kato 1998).  A population of 922 (CV=0.433; 95% CI 404, 2108) right whales was calculated for the Okhotsk Sea for the years 1989-1992 (Miyashita and Kato 1998).  Again, the reliability of this estimate is low due to wide confidence intervals (95% CI 404, 2108), likely caused by a small sample size (n=16).  Many still believe it is unlikely that there are more than a few hundred animals in the western population (Knowlton et al. 1994, IWC 1999, IWC 2001, Kraus et al. 2001).  In the eastern North Pacific, recent sightings are rare, although a few animals—between four and 13 individualshave been seen in the southeast Bering Sea each July since 1996 (Goddard & Rugh 1998, Tynan 1999, Brownell et al. 2001, LeDuc et al. 2001).  Acoustic detection suggests that right whales occur in the southeast Bering from August until November (Munger et al. 2003).  Eleven individual eastern North Pacific right whales have been photo-identified in the southeast Bering Sea (LeDuc et al. 2001).  Of these, genotypes have been determined for six from data collected between 1997 and 2000 (LeDuc et al. 2001).  Nine additional skin samples were collected in 2002, including one from the mother of a calf.  Although the 2002 samples are not yet genotyped, the only female known to date is the mother of this calf (Sue Moore, NMML, pers. comm.).

Ohsumi and Wada (1974) and Wada (1976) applied effort corrections to whaling data and estimated the population size at about 120 for the eastern North Pacific.  More recently, the lack of sightings despite considerable survey effort by Japan (Miyashita and Kato 1998) and the US (Scarff 1986, LeDuc et al. 2001) suggest that the population may number in the tens. 

 

 

3.         Factors affecting vulnerability and contributing to       threatened status

 

3.1       Habitat Requirements

3.1.1   Survival and Recovery Habitat

Establishing ‘critical habitat’ is difficult for baleen whales that can have ranges on ocean-basin scales.  The current abundance, reproductive rates, distribution patterns, migration routes, and feeding and calving grounds of North Pacific right whales are not known.  No studies or calculations have been conducted to identify the habitat required by North Pacific right whales to achieve and sustain a viable population.  It is therefore impossible to identify either the habitat currently occupied by the species, or the extent needed to maintain the current population size.

Potentially important right whale habitat has been identified in Bristol Bay (LeDuc et al. 2001), but such areas have not been found in BC waters due to the lack of survey effort and right whale sightings.  Oceanographic modeling may allow the prediction of potentially important habitat, and help to focus future survey efforts.

3.2       Ecological Role

 

North Pacific right whales are low trophic level filter feeders.  Despite their large size, they feed entirely on zooplankton, primarily copepods (Calanus spp.).  A single whale can eat several tonnes of copepods a day.  It is the right whale’s dependence on large, dense aggregations of prey that determines much of their distribution. 

It is thought that patterns of food consumption by large cetaceans (such as the right whale) have had strong effects on community structure in the Bering Sea (NRC 1996).  Laws (1985) estimated that an enormous reduction in the biomass of large whales in the Antarctic may have released 150 million tonnes of krill annually to remaining predators, resulting in an increase in smaller whales, seals, seabirds, and fish.  Similarly, a reduction in major consumers of plankton, and the resulting increase in plankton, may have greatly contributed to the shift in dominant fisheries seen in the Bering Sea during the 1970s and 1980s (Bowen 1997). 

The reduction of baleen whales and this shift in dominant fisheries occurred concurrently with physical changes throughout the Pacific.  Primary and secondary production increased in the North Pacific, due to deepening and shallowing of the mixed layers of different regions (Venrick et al. 1987, Venrick 1994, Polovina et al. 1995).  The combined changes in species abundance, community composition, trophic organization and physical factors indicate that a regime shift occurred (Benson and Trites 2002).  Such a regime shift could likely be accelerated by an abrupt change in biomass of large whales, thus increasing the amount of plankton available to remaining predators.

3.3       Biologically Limiting Factors

 

The following biologically limiting factors could possibly prevent the recovery of the North Pacific right whale, regardless of the additional threats to this species’ population viability and habitat discussed in section 3.4 below.

3.3.1   K-selected Species

The two species of Northern Hemisphere right whales possess several biological characteristics that make a species particularly susceptible to disturbance and recovery difficult (Clapham et al. 1999).  They are long-lived, females have a late age of sexual maturity estimated at 9 or 10 years (Hamilton et al 1988), and they have a long calving interval, generally calving every three to four years (Knowlton et al 1994).  Recently, the average calving interval in the North Atlantic has been reported to have increased to more than five years (Knowlton and Kraus 2001).

3.3.2   Critically Low Numbers

North Pacific right whales have a critically small population, which could result in low genetic diversity (inbreeding depression) or depensation (Allee Effect), thus restricting their recovery.  Indeed, evidence from mtDNA suggests that the North Atlantic right whale went through a very small genetic “bottleneck” (Schaeff et al. 1993), which may have resulted in a lowered reproductive rate and increased calving interval (Knowlton et al.1994).  Although haplotype diversity (in extant individuals) is low in the North Atlantic right whale, it is even lower in the Pacific species (5 and 2 haplotypes, respectively) (Rosenbaum et al. 2000a).  Depensation, or the inability to find mates due to low population size could also be affecting the recovery of this species (see section 3.4 on Threats). 

3.3.3   Food Supply

Reduction in the abundance of their food supply has been suggested as a possible explanation for low population growth rate in right whales.  The consequences of inadequate food supply could be either a reduction in individual growth rates, thus delaying sexual maturity, or insufficient blubber reserves needed for females to sustain pregnancy or lactation (Kenney et al. 1986).  However, currently nothing is known about reproduction in North Pacific right whales.  Calves have been reported in the western North Pacific (Omura 1986), but calculation of a reproductive rate is not possible.  Until a recent sighting of a cow and calf in the Bering Sea on August 24, 2002 there had been no sightings of calves in the eastern North Pacific since 1900 (Ferrero et al. 2000).  It is important to note, however, that although food supply may be a contributing factor, demographic constraints are much more likely to be the main cause of low population growth rates for the North Pacific right whale.

3.4             Historic Threats

3.4.1   Subsistence/Native Harvest

Traditional whaling around Japan and Korea greatly reduced the population of right whales from the western North Pacific (Gaskin 1987).  Monks et al. (2001) states that right whales were hunted in the eastern North Pacific  by central and northern Nuu-chah-nulth (Nootkan) tribes and that they were pursued whenever they were seen.  Subsistence whaling may also have been conducted by the Haida of the Queen Charlotte Islands, although it is unknown whether right whales were taken (Acheson and Wigen 2002).  Various aboriginal peoples from Washington State were also known to take this species (Mitchell 1979), although it was not usually the main target of their hunts, nor were they taken in great numbers (Brownell et al. 2001).  Currently, subsistence hunters in Alaska and Russia are not reported to take animals from the eastern North Pacific right whale population (Ferrero et al. 2000).  In Canadian waters, aboriginal whaling is not illegal, and should subsistence harvesting be renewed, it may represent a threat to remnant populations of the North Pacific right whale.

3.4.2   Commercial whaling

Commercial whaling for right whales began in the North Pacific in 1835 (Scarff 1991, 2001).  Whaling was most intense during the decade 1839-1848 which accounts for approximately 80 percent of the total historic catch of right whales (Scarff 2001).  The recorded right whale catches by American whalers amounted to at least 14,500 animals (Best 1987, IWC 1986), and Scarff (2001) estimates that the total whaling-related mortality during the period 1839-1909, including mortality of struck-but-lost whales and non-American whalers, was in the range of 26,500-37,000 animals.  Although right whales received some international protection starting as early as 1935, important North Pacific whaling countries—Japan and the Soviet Union—did not sign the international convention and continued whaling through World War II (Scarff 1986).  The first comprehensive prohibition on commercial whaling including shore-based whaling that was agreed to by all the major North Pacific whaling nations did not take effect until 1946.  However, “research whaling” was still permitted under this treaty and Japan took 13 right whales and the Soviet Union killed 10 right whales during the 1950s and 1960s legally. 

Illegal whaling in the North Pacific also occurred at a much larger scale.  Brownell et al. (2001) considered illegal hunting by the Soviet Union to address the question of the present status of North Pacific right whales.  Hundreds of right whales were illegally hunted in the Kuril Islands and the Okhotsk Sea, and 372 were killed in the eastern North Pacific, notably the Gulf of Alaska and southeastern Bering Sea (Yablokov 1994, Zemsky et al. 1995, Tormosov et al. 1998, Doroshenko 2000, cited in Brownell et al. 2001).  Remnant populations may have been gradually recovering from intense commercial whaling until the 1960s, when illegal Soviet catches further compromised recovery (Brownell et al. 2001).  The illegal hunting by the Soviets likely halted any nascent recovery of the remaining eastern and western North Pacific right whale population.  However, because of the rarity of these animals and international pressure, commercial whaling of the North Pacific right whale is no longer a threat and illegal whaling has apparently ended.

3.5             Current Threats

There are not sufficient data on occurrence, distribution, reproduction or genetics of North Pacific right whales to allow determination as to whether the threats described in this section currently exist in BC waters. Despite this lack of knowledge, it is important to consider all possible threats that may impact right whales occurring in BC waters. The threats listed in this section are currently affecting right whale populations in other national and international waters and should be investigated as potential threats off our coast.

Regardless of the ability to ultimately identify the primary threats affecting this population, we recognize that some of these threats (e.g., significant ecosystem regime shifts) cannot be eliminated, regardless of what measures are taken. For example, the effects of low genetic diversity, small population size and climate change will be impossible to reverse through human action.

3.5.1   Population Numbers and Genetic Diversity (inbreeding depression)

Each individual right whale is extremely important to this population in the North Pacific.  The loss of even a single individual will almost certainly adversely affect recovery.  The low number of known females in the population is particularly alarming, since losing a female could potentially reduce the rate of reproduction in such a small population.

Inbreeding depression is of major concern in the management and conservation of endangered species. The long-term effects of extreme population depletion by commercial whaling may include reduced genetic diversity and associated health and reproductive problems (Kenney 2002).  Schaeff et al. (1997) demonstrated from nuclear DNA that the proportion of genetic material shared among unrelated North Atlantic right whales is significantly higher than that shared among unrelated right whales in the South Atlantic.  Given that the population of right whales in the North Pacific is probably fewer than in the North Atlantic, it is possible that the proportion of genetic material shared among North Pacific right whales would be even higher than that of the North Atlantic.  Katona and Kraus (2001) pointed out that it is not known how much genetic variation is normal in a mammalian population, and correlation to health and reproductive problems would be very difficult.  This low genetic variation is a potential threat to the health of a population because of the possibility of inbreeding depression (Schaeff et al. 1997).  A population exhibiting inbreeding depression could have reduced reproduction and recruitment resulting from reduced fecundity, decreased neonate and juvenile survival, or lowered resistance to disease (Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1987, Haebler and Moeller 1993, Frankham 1995a, Frankham 1995b, Hedrick and Kalinowski 2000).  Presently, there are no data on the degree of genetic variation, disease, or reproductive and survival rates in North Pacific right whales.  Nevertheless, because of the rarity of this species, inbreeding depression should be considered a threat to the North Pacific right whale

3.5.2   Marine Traffic and Ship Strikes

Ship strikes are the most significant human-related source of mortality for right whales in the North Atlantic (Kenney 2002), but this is not known to be a significant source of mortality in the North Pacific.  Increasing marine traffic through shipping channels may disrupt right whales by displacing animals from prime habitat, as well as increasing the risk of ship strikes.  As information is gathered on right whales distribution and occurrence, their proximity to major shipping channels will determine whether ship strikes represent a significant threat to right whales in the North Pacific. This threat may be under-reported for right whales off the BC coast, due to the remoteness of most of the coast and because many ship strikes may go undetected or unreported.

3.5.3   Entanglement in Fishing Gear

Entanglement in fishing gear is a major source of injury and sometimes death for the North Atlantic right whale (Kraus 1990, Clapham et al. 1999, IWC 2001), and it is possible that right whales in the North Pacific are also exposed to this threat.  Entanglements that are not initially lethal may result in a gradual weakening in the entangled whale, making these individuals more susceptible to other indirect causes of mortality, such as disease (Kenny and Kraus 1993).  Due to the operation of Japanese salmon driftnet fisheries within the Russian Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) (inside the Okhotsk Sea and around Kamchatka) since 1991, entanglements in fishing gear may represent a major problem for the western population of North Pacific right whales (Brownell et al. 2001).  An entangled whale in the Okhotsk Sea was reported by T. Miyashita in 1992 (Brownell et al. 2001).  The Russian gill net fishery was implicated in the death of two right whales: one in 1983, and the other off the Kamchatka Peninsula (Russia) in 1989 (NMFS 1991, Kornev 1994).  Although entangled whales have not been reported in the Bering Sea or BC waters, there are extensive fisheries in the eastern Bering Sea and entanglements should be considered a threat to right whales in this area, which may also include individuals that use BC waters.

3.5.4   Habitat Degradation

Defining the habitat of right whales is difficult because these animals are wide-ranging and difficult to observe.  However, as human commercial or industrial activities are pursued in marine environments threats resulting from these activities can be expected. Potential threats to North Pacific right whale habitat may include major shipping channels, high traffic zones, undersea exploration and development of mineral deposits (Silber and Clapham 2001).

3.5.5   Noise

Right whales may rely on sound for communication, navigation, attracting mates, or detection of predators and prey (Clark 1994).  Therefore sound sources that interfere with these functions could result in disruption of migration, feeding, breeding, and other vital activities.  The effects of noise on right whales might range from subtle changes in behaviour to physiological damage, such as permanent hearing loss and mortality due to inner ear blast injuries.

Sources of noise from human activities include, seismic testing for oil and gas exploration, active sonar and explosives testing by the military, underwater noisemakers to deter marine mammals from fishing nets and fish pens, marine experiments that involve the use of loud sounds, and increasing levels of noise from everyday boat and ship traffic (Anonymous 2000).  Underwater noise produced by commercial shipping occurs in frequency ranges similar to those of right whale calls, thereby potentially interfering with right whale communication (Richardson et al 1995, Kenney 2002).  This could lead to displacement from migration routes or important habitats.  Evidence of displacement can be seen in a recent study indicating that seismic surveys for offshore oil and gas being conducted off Sakhalin in Russia have excluded grey whales from their primary feeding habitat (Brownell personal communication).

Underwater explosions from construction, military exercises, and oceanographic or geophysical research are known to directly affect the physiology of whales, and may result in mortality.  In 1992, humpback whales off Newfoundland were found with damaged ear structures after underwater blasting was used in constructing oil installations (Ketten et al. 1993, Lien et al. 1995).  And recently, the United States Navy has released a report in which it takes responsibility for the death of six whales found beached with haemorrhaging after a sonar test in the Bahamas (March 15 and 16, 2000).  Such activities should be of great concern in BC waters, particularly in areas where oil and gas exploration, pipeline construction, and military exercises are conducted or proposed.

3.5.6   Climate Change and Food Supply

Climate-driven regime shifts cause major changes in ecological relationships over large-scale oceanographic areas (Francis and Hare 1994), and are manifested faster at lower trophic levels in marine ecosystems (Benson and Trites 2002).  An increase in surface water temperature could result in a declining zooplankton population (Roemmich and McGowan 1995), thus changing the carrying capacity of the Pacific (Venrick et al. 1987). Right whales feed exclusively on zooplankton, and primarily on large calanoid copepods.  They have a narrow range of prey species preference and require prey concentrations of exceptionally high densities.  The presence of such concentrations is dependent upon physical factors, such as currents, and temperature.  This combination of a narrow range of prey, and the requirement of high densities of prey dependent upon physical factors might make the right whale more sensitive than other cetaceans to impacts from global climate change (Kenney 2002). 

Competition from sei whales has also been suggested as a limiting factor on right whale populations in the North Atlantic (Mitchell 1975).  Payne et al. (1990) believed that competition is greater from planktivorous fishes (e.g. herring, sandlance, basking sharks), and that this competition could lead to changes in abundance and distribution of baleen whales.  However, there is no evidence for competition between North Pacific right whales and sympatric species. 

Inadequate food supply was addressed by Kenney et al. (1986), who suggested that the consequences could be either a reduction in individual growth rates, thus delaying sexual maturity, or insufficient blubber reserves needed for females to sustain pregnancy or lactation.  He also suggested that a reduction in the abundance of copepods, caused by either climate change or competition, is a possible explanation for the low population growth rate in right whales (Kenney 2002).  Furthermore, any impacts may be amplified by matrilineal fidelity to feeding grounds, and possibly a low ability to locate new feeding grounds when changing conditions lead to a shift in prey distribution.

3.5.7   Pollution

Pollution may affect whales in various ways.  Non-food items or contaminants could be ingested directly during feeding (Katona and Kraus 2001).  Right whales feed in convergent zones and slicks where surface currents concentrate anything that floats, including contaminants, oil, and floating garbage (Carr 1985).  Baleen whales may also be affected through impacts on marine productivity (O’Shea and Brownell 1994), especially right whales due to their specialized copepod diet.

Contaminants can enter the tissues either directly (e.g.  ingestion) from the environment or through bioaccumulation from prey.  Organochlorine compounds (∑DDT and PCBs) and metals are the contaminants of most concern for marine mammals.  Despite high concentrations of PCBs in fish- and mammal-eating cetaceans (i.e. St. Lawrence Belugas and Pacific killer whales) (Béland et al. 1993, Ross et al. 2000, Addison and Ross 2001, Grant and Ross 2002, Ross 2002a, Ross 2002b), right whales are low trophic level grazers, thus minimizing the concentrations of contaminants accumulating via their prey.  O’Shea and Brownell (1994) reported that concentrations of contaminants in baleen whales were generally much lower than in odontocetes; however, they emphasize that additional samples would be valuable.

3.5.8   Depensation (Allee effect)

It is believed that populations at very low densities exhibit reduced reproductive rates (Anonymous 2000).  This is the opposite of what would be expected by populations that have positive density dependence.  This negative density-dependence is called depensation, or the Allee effect.  A population at very low density may have reduced levels of reproduction due to a low probability of finding another right whale, or density dependent courting behaviours that facilitate reproduction.  Courting and reproductive behaviours, such as seen in right whale “surface-active groups” that require several males, could be affected by low population densities, resulting in reduced reproduction (Anonymous 2000).  However, it will always be difficult to verify that depensation is the cause of reduced reproductive success when alternative explanations exist. 

3.6       Socio-economic Considerations

North American aboriginal whaling can be traced back about 3000 to 4000 years (Monk et al. 2001).  Right whales were once a valuable resource to early whalers (early 1800s) and were historically valued by Makah and Nuu-chah-nulth First Nations.   However, right whales were not the primary target of aboriginal hunts, nor does it appear that they were taken in great numbers (Brownell et al. 2001).  The aboriginal right to hunt whales by First Nations in British Columbia still exists.  However, right whales would not likely be targeted due to their rarity.

A thriving whale-watching industry has developed on the BC coast during the past two decades, but there is currently no commercial whale-watching value for the North Pacific right whale.  The species’ is too rare to sustain a whale-watching industry focussed solely upon the North Pacific right whale.

The value of a right whale is no longer in its baleen and oil, but in its intrinsic worth (i.e. the perceived rather than the monetary value).  The rarity of encountering this large charismatic mammal, so important to human history, gives right whales an enormous intrinsic value.

3.7       Knowledge Gaps

 

There is an urgent need for information on the distribution, biology, ecology and threats to the North Pacific right whale.  Knowledge of the species is not yet adequate to clearly define recovery objectives or approaches.

3.7.1   Population structure, genetics

There are uncertainties about population structure and number of populations for the North Pacific right whale.  Genetic investigations would delineate populations, perhaps providing support for the two-population hypothesis, or determining the number of populations.  Analyses using both mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA would address the question of genetic exchange between populations in high latitudes or on offshore breeding grounds (Brownell et al. 2001).  These analyses would provide information on genetic diversity and determine whether a bottleneck has occurred in these populations, as found in the North Atlantic right whale.  A genetic “bottleneck” could limit the recovery of the North Pacific right whale through reduced reproduction and recruitment resulting from reduced fecundity, decreased neonate and juvenile survival, or lowered resistance to disease (Ralls et al. 1988, Haebler and Moeller 1993).  However, as Brownell et al. (2001) noted, the major obstacle to these genetic studies is finding a sufficient sample of right whales.

3.7.2   Life history parameters, population dynamics

The life history parameters and population dynamics of the North Pacific right whale need further investigation.  Data on the abundance and population dynamics of right whales in the North Pacific need to be collected and analysed.  For example, if evidence exists for delayed onset of sexual maturity, then potential causes such as insufficient food supply, low genetic diversity or depensation should be investigated.

3.7.3  Current presence, abundance, distribution, and habitat use in BC waters

Information on the occurrence, distribution and migration patterns of right whales in the North Pacific is critical to identifying the key factors affecting the recovery of this species.  Feeding grounds remain unknown in BC waters, yet right whales likely exist in BC waters, though in very low numbers.  Without data on distribution, there is no way of knowing if a conflict exists between shipping channels and important habitats, or whether a decrease in reproductive success is a result of shifts in prey availability.  Determining habitat use is critical to determining the abundance and distribution of right whales in BC waters.

To determine important habitat (including critical habitat) for right whales in BC waters, a combination of the following research methods may be necessary:

·     Oceanographic modeling to investigate relationship with primary prey species      (Calanus copepods)

·     Ship-based surveys stratified in areas likely to have concentrations of high             density copepods (from oceanographic modeling)

·     Ship-based surveys in areas identified as historically important habitats

·     Acoustic recording packages (ARPs) may be placed at locations identified as      potentially important habitat to monitor for the seasonal presence of right        whales.

3.7.4   Clarification of threats, human influences

The greatest threat to North Pacific right whales is likely their critically low population size. To investigate this threat, information on the abundance and distribution of this species is necessary.  Clarification is required on the extent that marine projects or developments (e.g., shipping lanes, underwater explosives) pose a threat to the North Pacific right whale by direct and indirect impact(s).  A thorough investigation of the potential for conflict between shipping lanes and right whale distribution may be critical to the survival of right whales, as seen in the North Atlantic.  Preferred habitat and genetic delineation of populations must also be clarified.  Without accurate information regarding the population structure of North Pacific right whales and the habitats they use, we will be less effective at determining how human actions affect right whales and whether our management actions are having the desired result of reducing human impact on this species.

 

 

 

It is important to note that it is not possible to develop measurable recovery criteria at this time due to the lack of data on the biology, distribution, abundance and threats affecting the North Pacific right whale.  Nor will it be possible to gain enough data within a few years to develop and measure recovery criteria for such an extremely depleted and long-lived species.  Due of this uncertainty in measuring recovery for this species, it is essential that all the recovery objectives be met to verify that the recovery goal is achieved.

4.1       Recovery Goal

Increase the probability of survival for the North Pacific right whale in Canadian waters and maintain long-term viability of the population.

4.2             Recovery Objectives

To achieve the goal of the North Pacific right whale recovery strategy, all of the following objectives should be met.

·        Gather baseline data on presence, occurrence, distribution, abundance and habitat to make recovery efforts possible.

·        Obtain information on potential threats to North Pacific right whales that frequent Canadian waters.

·        Develop and implement tasks or programs to reduce impacts from human activities on the population of right whales that frequent BC waters.

·        Conduct long-term monitoring of the status of North Pacific right whales and evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation strategies.

·        Contribute to bilateral and multilateral cooperative efforts to conserve and recover the North Pacific right whale.

·        Raise awareness and understanding of the status of and threats to North Pacific right whales, and engage Canadians in supporting national and international recovery efforts.

4.3       Recovery Strategies

It is important to note that, for a long-lived species such as the right whale, it may take many decades before increases in this population can be observed.  It is therefore critical that the long-term nature of this strategy is recognized in the development of the objectives and supporting strategies.

The following strategies include efforts that will not only be essential to the survival of North Pacific right whales, but may also be important for other baleen whale species that occur in the same habitats in the region (eg. Blue, fin, sei and humpback whales).  This set of strategies should be coordinated with other baleen whale strategies in a multi-species approach.

Scientific Research

1.   Evaluate information on preferred habitats of right whales worldwide to identify potential critical and important habitats in BC waters.

2.   Conduct multi-species acoustically-aided surveys to examine the potential occurrence of North Pacific right whales in areas formerly occupied off the BC coast.

3.   Deploy multiple remote acoustical recording packages to monitor for the presence of North Pacific right whales off BC.

4.   Utilize platforms of opportunity and develop sighting networks to take advantage of opportunistic sightings.

5.   Develop procedures and protocols to respond to any stranding of a right whale.

6.   Coordinate with international research efforts on right whales to ensure that photographic identification, collection of skin samples and other procedures are done in such a way as to maximize knowledge and collaboration.

7.   Compile all historical information and a list of archived samples (including skeletal remains) available for the North Pacific right whale.

8.   Undertake population viability analyses of the North Pacific right whale population.

Threats Research

1.   Evaluate information on human impacts on right whales and other cetaceans worldwide to determine whether similar human activities off BC could affect the right whale.

2.   Review mitigation measures that have been effective in other regions and countries, and where appropriate, incorporate such measures into mitigation efforts for the North Pacific right whale.

Mitigation and Protection

Some of the strategies set for this objective address potential threats in BC waters that can be acted upon immediately, while others call for action following the identification and assessment of new threats.

 

1.   Protect potential critical habitat for the North Pacific right whale in BC waters.

2.   Ensure no right whales are killed by commercial or aboriginal hunting.  One option may include Canada joining the IWC.

3.   Take immediate steps to minimize impacts of threats identified through research or circumstance.

4.   Establish response programs for disentangling right whales in fishing gear and examine fishing practises of those gear types found to entangle right whales.

5.   Review appropriate laws and infrastructure needed to enable possible changes in shipping lanes and shipping operations.

6.   Ensure inter-agency coordination within and between provincial and federal governments to develop stringent assessment processes that explicitly consider potential impacts on right whales and their habitat from human activities, including:

·        broadcast of loud underwater sounds

·        oil and gas exploration and development

·        coastal development

·        aquaculture

·        industrial activities

·        military activities

·        fisheries

7.   Review national and international oil spill contingency plans to ensure they include measures to protect right whales and their habitats.

Monitoring and Evaluation

1.   Evaluate whether current research efforts are effectively monitoring the North Pacific right whale, and take steps to improve research strategies where needed.

2.   Continue long-term monitoring of the occurrence of North Pacific right whales.

3.   Evaluate data on trends in North Pacific right whale distribution and abundance in BC waters and throughout their range.

Coordination

1.   Ratify, respect, and/or contribute to international instruments, particularly the International Whaling Commission, that promote North Pacific right whale protection and recovery.

2.   Initiate agreements and collaborative projects that promote conservation and protection with countries that share the population of right whales that frequents Pacific Canadian waters.

3.   Facilitate exchange of individuals from government, academia, industry, and non-government organizations for participation in international research and recovery programs.

Education and Awareness

This set of strategies should be coordinated with other cetacean strategies in a multi-species approach.

1.   Promote awareness of North Pacific right whale conservation and recovery issues within government departments.

2.   Develop public awareness campaigns and educational programs that highlight right whale status, distribution, biology, threats and recovery efforts in Canada.

3.  Promote public involvement in stewardship programs.

4.4       Considerations for Recovery:

4.4.1  Ecological and technical feasibility of species recovery

At present, adequate knowledge does not exist for an accurate assessment of the feasibility of recovering North Pacific right whales.

4.4.2   Anticipated Conflicts or Challenges

The greatest foreseeable obstacle to the goal and objectives of this recovery plan is the rarity of the North Pacific right whales.  Although there has been very little search effort in BC waters, sightings of right whales in adjacent US waters are rare despite considerable survey effort.  When found, they are usually as single animals or in small groups. There have been only 13 individuals recently found in the eastern North Pacific.

Habitat protection may need to be large-scale, which could create opposition.  Consideration of impacts on the North Pacific right whale in the environmental impact assessment for any off-shore developments could be seen as an obstacle to industry (e.g., ports, oil and gas exploration and dredging).  Strategies to minimize entanglement in fishing gear may affect commercial fisheries through area closures and gear changes.  Any restrictions on large-scale underwater noise could affect seismic and military activities. All of these measures will require cooperation from these industries, and could result in technical, economic, commercial, legal and political conflict.

The recovery strategy needs to ensure that conservation strategies on this long-lived species are maintained, and that long-term research and monitoring of trends are continued over time.  This will require consistent and adequate levels of funding.

Clarification is needed on the position of aboriginal subsistence hunting.  There should be no subsistence hunting of the North Pacific right whale due to its extreme rarity.  This may be a source of conflict if First Nations decide to pursue traditional hunts in the future.

4.4.3   Recommended Approach / Scale for Recovery

A long-term approach to research and conservation action is essential to the recovery of this species.  Right whales, like all baleen whales, occur over large oceanographic spatial and temporal scales.  Thus, for this strategy to be successful, it will require dedicated long-term funding and research support. 

A multi-species research program is the recommended approach for the recovery strategy.  Future recovery strategies for other baleen whales at risk are anticipated to have similar objectives and strategies, and will directly benefit from the foresight of developing an efficient multi-species research program.

 

 

5.1             Research in Canada

5.1.1   Pacific Canada

Until recently, research on the North Pacific right whale was absent on the Pacific coast of Canada.  In 2002, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans conducted three multi-species acoustically-aided surveys to examine the potential occurrence of North Pacific right whales in areas formerly occupied off the BC coast.  Remote acoustical recording packages (ARPs) for monitoring the presence of North Pacific right whales off BC have also been developed, and a prototype has been deployed 700 miles off-shore. There will be two new devices deployed and the prototype will be re-deployed in 2003.  At least two multi-species acoustically-aided surveys will be completed in 2003.

5.1.2       Atlantic Canada

Unlike right whale research in the Pacific, right whale research in the Atlantic has been ongoing for a number of decades.  Dedicated surveys for right whales in the two known habitat areas in Atlantic Canada, the lower Bay of Fundy between Nova Scotia and New Brunswick and Roseway Basin on the western Scotian Shelf between Browns and Baccaro Banks began in 1980.  During these surveys researchers have collected photographs for individual identification of right whales.  The database on North Atlantic right whales is archived by member institutions of the North Atlantic Right Whale Consortium.  The right whale research team at the New England Aquarium (Director: Scott D. Kraus) curates the database on the photographed sightings of individually identified right whales.  As of February 11, 2003 there are 26,854 sightings of 438 right whales of which 322 are thought to be alive (IWC 2001; Kraus et al. 2001, NEAq, unpublished data).  Recent mathematical modeling studies suggest the probability of survivability is declining (Caswell et al. 1999; Fujiwara and Caswell 2001).   As of 2001, there are also 415 genetic samples from 302 individually identified right whales.  Michael Moore of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute curates the database on blubber thickness measurements and blubber samples from necropsies and biopsy samples.

Western North Atlantic right whales have been subject to serious injury and death from human activities, and have experienced a significant decline in reproductive rates during the last ten years (Knowlton and Kraus 2001; Kraus et al. 2001).  Modeling studies by Fujiwara and Caswell (2001) suggest that population growth rates from 1980 to 1995 declined from λ=1.03 in 1980 to λ=0.98 in 1995, suggesting that if the 1995 growth rate were maintained, the population would go extinct in about 200 years.  This projected trajectory has led to international calls for immediate conservation management action (Fujiwara and Caswell 2001; IWC 2001).

In 1994, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans designated two conservation areas for right whales (Bay of Fundy and Roseway Basin). The World Wildlife Fund and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans brought together a Northern Right Whale Recovery Team in 1997.  This was the first major recovery team in Canada to include private stakeholders along with scientific experts, government agencies and conservation groups.  This team developed the Canadian North Atlantic right whale recovery plan (September 2000).

Since 2000, a team of scientists, researchers and graduate students from the Defence Research Establishment Atlantic (DREA) and Dalhousie University have been testing sonobuoys and bottom-mounted hydrophones to determine whether right whales can be located in order to warn ships of their presence.  WWF, the fishing industry, conservation organizations and a gear manufacturer have begun working together to test fishing gear that has been specially designed to release entangled whales or modified to reduce the incidence of entanglement.  Representatives from the shipping, fishing, and whale watching industries have been working with right whale biologists from university, non-governmental organizations, Transport Canada Marine Safety, and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans to analyze right whale distribution and ship traffic in the Bay of Fundy, resulting in an amendment to the Traffic Separation Scheme lanes in the Bay of Fundy to protect the North Atlantic right whale population from ship strikes by reducing the probability of a ship strike.  The measure was adopted by the International Maritime Organization and takes effect July 1, 2003.

5.2             Legal Protection

Right whales have been protected from commercial whaling by the International Whaling Commission (IWC) since 1949, when Japan and the Soviet Union joined the IWC.  However, extensive illegal whaling by the Soviet Union into the 1960s has been documented (Doroschenko 2000, Brownell et al. 2001). Although Japan has continued to take cetaceans under scientific permits, right whales have not been targeted.  CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) is an international agreement between Governments.  Its goal is to ensure that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival.  Right whales were listed by CITES in 1975 in Appendix 1, which consists of species threatened most with extinction. Trade in specimens of these species is permitted only in exceptional circumstances.

In Canada, the federal Fisheries Act provides a legislative framework for the conservation and protection of right whales in Canada.  Currently, all harvest of right whales is prohibited.  The Fisheries Act also prohibits the disturbance of right whales and the federal Oceans Act includes provisions for the protection of right whale habitat by creating Marine Protected Areas (MPAs).  Right whales may also be protected under the Species At Risk Act should the Minister of Environment recommend a legal listing to the Governor in Council (GIC). 

5.3       Listing Status

5.3.1   Status in Canada

COSEWIC does not currently distinguish the North Pacific right whale as a separate species from the North Atlantic right whale. Right whales—both Pacific and Atlantic—were listed by COSEWIC as Endangered in 1987 (Gaskin 1987). North Pacific right whales are expected to be acknowledged as a distinct species and re-assessed by COSEWIC for June 2003. There is no hope of down-listing this species in the near future.

5.3.2   Status in the US

In US waters, northern right whales were first protected by the Endangered Species Conservation Act—the precursor to the ESA—and are now protected by both the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA).

The northern right whale—which included both the North Atlantic and North Pacific populations—was listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Conservation Act in June 1970. Right whales in the North Atlantic were then listed as “endangered” under the ESA in 1973, and listed as “depleted” under the MMPA that year.  The North Pacific right whale was also listed as “endangered” under the ESA of 1973, and designated as “depleted” under the MMPA.  North Pacific and North Atlantic populations of right whales have recently been recognized as separate species by the National Marine Fisheries Service, thus amending the US ESA list of endangered species (G.Silber, NMFS, pers. comm.).

5.3.3   International Status

An international assessment was completed in 1996 by the IUCN (The World Conservation Union).  This assessment delineated three “populations”—North Pacific, North Atlantic and southern. However, it did not distinguish these populations as separate species—Eubalaena japonica, Eubalaena glacialis and Eubalaena australis, respectively. The North Pacific and North Atlantic populations were listed as Endangered, and the southern population was listed as Lower Risk.

5.4       Recovery Strategies

The Canadian North Atlantic right whale recovery plan was completed in September 2000 (Anon 2000).  It was prepared by the North Atlantic Right Whale Recovery Team, for World Wildlife Fund Canada and Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

The US has drafted updated recovery plans for both the North Pacific (Eubalaena japonica) and North Atlantic (Eubalaena glacialis) species.  These recovery plans recognize distinct eastern and western populations for each species.  However, the eastern population of the North Atlantic right whale is considered “functionally extinct”.

5.5       North Pacific Right Whale Recovery Team

A recovery team for the North Pacific right whale was formed in 2003. The team, which is coordinated by Fisheries and Oceans Canada, includes representatives from Fisheries and Oceans Canada, the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service, Vancouver Aquarium Marine Science Centre, Cascadia Research, Center for Coastal Studies and Sierra Club.  Section 10 provides further information on recovery team members.

 

 

An action plan will be completed within two years of approval of the Recovery Strategy.

 

 

As mentioned in the section 4.3, the recovery strategies include measures that will not only enhance the prospects for the recovery of North Pacific right whales, but may also directly benefit other baleen whales.  These strategies are not only beneficial to baleen whales, but also to other species (i.e. benthic organisms, fish, birds, etc.) that occupy the same habitats and may be vulnerable to the same threats. 

 

 

 

Category of Activity

Evaluation Questions

Scientific Research

Were acoustically-aided surveys conducted and remote acoustical recording packages deployed in areas formerly occupied off the BC coast?

Were platforms of opportunity used and sighting networks developed?

Were procedures and protocols developed to recognize and respond to right whale strandings?

Have research efforts been coordinated internationally on right whales to ensure that photographic identification, collection of skin samples and other procedures are done in such a way as to maximize knowledge and collaboration?

Was information on preferred habitats of right whales worldwide evaluated and used to identify potential important habitats in BC waters?

Has all historical information been compiled and a list of archived samples made available for the North Pacific right whale?

Threats Research

Was information on human impacts on right whales and other cetaceans worldwide evaluated and used to determine whether similar human activities off BC could affect the right whale?

Were mitigation measures that have been effective in other regions and countries reviewed, and where appropriate, were such measures incorporated into mitigation efforts for the North Pacific right whale?

Mitigation and Protection

Have measures been implemented to ensure no right whales are killed by commercial or aboriginal hunting?

Were immediate steps taken to minimize impacts of threats identified through research or circumstance?

Were response programs established for disentangling right whales in fishing gear, and were fishing practises examined?

Is there a completed review of appropriate laws and infrastructure needed to enable possible changes in shipping lanes and shipping operations?

Was inter-agency coordination within and between provincial and federal governments successful in developing stringent assessment processes that explicitly consider potential impacts on right whales and their habitat from human activities? (see list of human activities in Section 4.3, Mitigation and Protection Strategies)

Were national and international oil spill contingency plans reviewed to ensure they include measures to protect right whales and their habitats?

Monitoring and Evaluation

Are current research efforts effectively monitoring the North Pacific right whale, and can research strategies be improved?

Has long-term monitoring of the occurrence of North Pacific right whales continued?

Were data on trends in distribution and abundance evaluated for BC waters and throughout their range?

Coordination Efforts

Were ratifications and contributions made to international instruments that promote North Pacific right whale protection and recovery?

Were agreements and collaborative projects initiated with countries that share the population of right whales that frequents Pacific Canadian waters?

Were measures implemented to facilitate participation of individuals from government, academia, industry, and non-government organizations in international research and recovery programs?

Education and Awareness

Was awareness of North Pacific right whale conservation and recovery issues promoted within government departments?

Have public awareness campaigns and educational programs been developed that highlight right whale status, distribution, biology, threats and recovery efforts in Canada?

 

 

 

Acheson, S., and Wigen, R.J.  2002.  Evidence for a prehistoric whaling tradition among the Haida.  J. Northwest Anthrop. 36:155-168.

 

Addison R.F. and Ross P.S. 2001. Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in British Columbia harbour seals and killer whales. PSARC Canadian Stock Assessment Secretariat (Fisheries and Oceans Canada), Ottawa, Ontario.

 

Anonymous. 1976. Japan. Progress report on whale research, June 1974 to May 1975. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm. 26: 416-424.

 

Anonymous. 2000. Canadian North Atlantic Right Whale Recovery Plan. Prepared by the Canadian North Atlantic Right Whale Recovery Team for World Wildlife Fund Canada and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. 103 pp.

 

Béland P., De Guise S., Girard C., Lagacé A., Martineau D., Michaud R., Muir D.C.G., Norstrom R.J., Pelletier É., Ray S. and Shugart L.R. 1993. Toxic Compounds and Health and Reproductive Effects in St. Lawrence Beluga Whales. J. Great Lakes Res. 19(4): 766-775.

 

Benson A.J. and Trites A.W. 2002. Ecological effects of regime shifts in the Bering Sea and eastern North Pacific Ocean. Fish and fisheries. 3: 95-113.

 

Berzin A.A and Yabokov A.V. 1978. Number and population structure of the main exploited species of cetaceans in the World Ocean. Zool. Zh. 57(12): 1771-1785.

 

Berzin A.A. and Doroshenko N.V. 1982. Distribution and abundance of right whales in the North Pacific. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm. 32: 381-383.

 

Berzin A.A. and Vladimirov V.L. 1989. Recent distribution and abundance of cetaceans in the Sea of Okhotsk. Sov. J. Mar. Biol. 15(2): 84-90.

 

Best P.B. 1987. Estimates of the landed catch of right (and other whalebone) whales in the American fishery, 1805-1909. Fish. Bull. 85(3): 403-418.

 

Bowen W.D. 1997. Role of marine mammals in aquatic ecosystems. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 158: 267-274.

 

Braham H.W and Rice D.W. 1984. The right whale, Balaena glacialis. Mar. Fish. Rev. 46(4): 38-44.

 

Brownell R.L., Clapham P.J., Miyashita T. and Kasuya T. 2001. Conservation status of North Pacific right whales. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. (Special Issue) 2: 269-286.

 

Carr A.F. 1985. Rips, FADS, and little loggerheads. BioScience. 36: 92-100.

 

Caswell H., Fujiwara M. and Brault S. 1999. Declining survival probability threatens the North Atlantic right whale. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 96:3308-3313.

 

Charlesworth D. and Charlesworth B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 237-268.

 

Clapham, P., Good, C., Wetmore, S. and Brownell, R.L. Jr.  In Review.  Distribution of North Pacific right whales (Eubalaena japonica) as shown by 19th and 20th century whaling catch and sighting records.  J. Cetacean Res. Manage.

 

Clapham P.J., Young S.B. and Brownell R.L. 1999. Baleen Whales: conservation issues and the status of the most endangered populations. Mammal Rev. 29:35-60.

 

Clark C.W. 1994. Basic understandings of whale bioacoustics: Potential impacts of man-made sounds from oceanographic research. Abstract: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96 (5): Part 2: 3269.

 

Donovan G.P. 1992. The International Whaling Commission: Given its past, does it have a future? pp. 23-44 in J.J. Symoens (ed.), Symposium “Whales: Biology—Conservation—Threats”. Royal Academy of Overseas Sciences, Brussels, Belgium. 261 pp.

 

Doroshenko N.V. 2000. Soviet Whaling for blue, gray, bowhead and right whales in the Noth Pacific Ocean, 1961-1979. pp. 96-103 in A.V. Yablokov and V.A. Zemsky (eds.), Soviet Whaling Data (1949-1979). Centre for Russian Environmental Policy, Moscow. 408 pp.

 

Ferrero R.C., DeMaster D.P, Hill P.S., Muto M.M. and Lopez A.L. 2000. Alaska Marine Mammal Stock Assessments, 2000. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-119.

 

Fiscus C.H. and Niggol K. 1965. Observations of cetaceans off California, Oregon, and Washington. US Fish Wildl. Serv. Spec. Sci. Rep. Fish. 498: 1-27.

 

Francis R.C. and Hare S.R. 1994. Decadal-scale regime shifts in the large marine ecosystems of the North-east Pacific: a case for historical science. Fisheries Oceanography. 3(4): 279-291.

 

Frankham R. 1995a. Conservation genetics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29: 305-327.

 

Frankham R. 1995b. Inbreeding and extinction: a threshold effect. Conserv. Biol. 9: 792-799.

 

Fujiwara M. and Caswell H. 2001. Demography of the endangered North Atlantic right whale. Nature. 414: 537-541.

 

Gaskin D.E. 1976. The evolution, zoogeography and ecology of Cetacea. Oceanographic Marine Biological Annual Review. 14: 247-346.

 

Gaskin D.E. 1987. Updated status of the right whale, Eubalaena japonica, in Canada. Can. Field-Nat. 101: 295-309.

 

Gaskin, D.E. 1991. An update on the Status of the Right Whale, Eubalaena glacialis, in Canada. Can. Field-Nat. 105(2): 198-205.

 

Gilmore R.M. 1956. Rare right whale visits California. Pac. Discovery. 9(4): 20-25.

 

Goddard P.D. and Rugh D.J. 1998. A group of right whales seen in the Bering Sea in July 1996. Mar. Mammal Sci. 14(2):344-349.

 

Grant S.C.H. and Ross P.S. 2002. Southern resident killer whales at risk: Toxic chemicals in the British Columbia and Washington environment. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2412. 11 pp.

 

Haebler R. and Moeller R.B.J. 1993. Pathobiology of selected marine mammal diseases. pp. 127-244 in J.A. Couch, and J.W. Fournie (eds.), Pathobiology of marine and estuarine organisms. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

 

Hamilton P. K., Knowlton A. R., Marx M. K. and Kraus S. D. 1988. Age structure and longevity in North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) and their relation to reproduction. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Series. 171(0): 285-292.

 

Hay 1985. Studies of the Right Whales, Eubalaena glacialis, in Canada. Can. Field-Nat. 99(3): 433-437.

 

Hedrick P.W. and Kalinowski S.T. 2000. Inbreeding Depression in Conservation in Conservation Biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31(1): 139 -162.

 

Herman L.M., Baker C.S., Forestell P.H. and Antinoja R.C. 1980. Right Whale, Balaena glacialis, sightings near Hawaii: a clue to the wintering grounds? Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2:271-275.

 

International Whaling Commission. 1986. Report of the workshop on the status of right whales. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm. (Special Issue) 10: 1-33.

 

International Whaling Commission. 1999. Report of the workshop on the comprehensive assessment of right whales worldwide. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. 1(supplement): 119-120.

 

International Whaling Commission. 2001. Report of the workshop on the status and trends of western North Atlantic right whales. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. (Special Issue) 2: 61-87.

 

International Whaling Commission. 2001b. Report of the workshop on the Comprehensive Assessment of Right Whales: A worldwide comparison. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. (Special Issue) 2: 1-60.

 

Katona K.K. and Kraus S.D. 2001. Efforts to Conserve the North Atlantic Right Whale. pp. 311-331 in J.R. Twiss and R.R. Reeves (eds.), Conservation and Management of Marine Mammals. 471 pp.

 

Kenney, R.D. and Kraus, S.D. 1993. Right whale mortality - A correction and an update. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 9: 445-446.

 

Kenney R.D., Hyman M.A.M., Owen R.E., Scott G.P., and Winn H.E. 1986. Estimation of prey densities required by western North Atlantic right whales. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 2: 1-13.

 

Kenney R.D. 2001. North Atlantic, North Pacific, and Southern right whales. pp. 806-813 in W.F. Perrin, B.Wursig, J.G.M. Thewissen, W.F. Perrin, B.G. Wursig (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals. 1414 pp.

 

Ketten D.R., Lien J. and Todd S. 1993. Blast injury in humpback whale ears: Evidence and implications. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94:1849-1850.

 

Klumov S.K. 1962. The right whale in the Pacific Ocean. pp. 202-297 in: P.I. Usachev (ed.), Biological Marine Studies. Trudy Institute Okeanog. 58.

 

Knowlton A.R., Kraus S.D. and Kenney R.D. 1994. Reproduction in North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis). Can. J. Zool. 72: 1297-1305.

 

Knowlton A.R. and Kraus S.D. 2001. Mortality and serious injury of northern right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) in the western North Atlantic Ocean. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. (Special Issue) 2: 193-208.

 

Kornev S.I. 1994. A note on the death of a right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) off Cape Lopakta (Kamchatka). Rep. Int. Whal. Comm. (Special Issue 15): 443-444.

 

Kraus S. D. 1990. Rates and potential causes of mortality in North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis). Marine Mammal Journal of Zoology. 6(4):278-291.

 

Kraus S.D., Prescott J.H., Knowlton A.R. and Stone G.S. 1986. Migration and calving of right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) in the western North Atlantic. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm. (Special Issue) 10: 139-144.

 

Kraus S.D., Hamilton P.K., Kenney R.D., Knowlton A. and Slay C.K. 2001. Status and trends in reproduction of the North Atlantic right whale. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. (Special Issue) 2 (in press).

 

Laws R.M. 1985. The ecology of the Southern ocean. Am. Sci. 73: 26-40.

 

LeDuc R.G., Perryman W.L., Gilpatrick J.W. Jr., Hyde J., Stinchcomb C., Carretta J.D. and Brownell R.L. Jr. 2001. Recent surveys for right whales in the southeastern Bering Sea. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. (Special Issue) 2: 287-289.

 

Lien J., Taylor D.G. and Borggaard D. 1995. Management of underwater explosions in areas of high whale abundance. pp. 627-632 in Proceedings MARIENV ’95. Vol. 2.

 

Maury M.F. 1852. et seq. Whale Chart of the World. Series F (Wind and Current Charts) Sheet 1 (Washington 1852), sheets 2-4 (no date).

 

Maury M.F.  1853. A chart showing the favourite resort of the sperm and right whale by M.F. Maury, LLD Lieut. US Navy. Constructed from Maury’s Whale Chart of the World, by Robert H. Wyman, Liet. USN by Authority of Commo: Charles Morris USN Chief of Bureau of Ordnance and Hydrography. Washington, 1 sheet.

 

Mitchell E. 1975. Trophic relationships and competition for food in northwest Atlantic whales. Proceeding of the Canadian Society of Zoology (Annual Meeting): 123-132.

 

Mitchell E. D. 1979. Comments on magnitude of early catch of east Pacific gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus). Rep. int. Whal. Commn. 29: 307-314.

 

Miyashita T. and Kato H. 1998. Recent data on the status of right whales in the NW Pacific Ocean. Paper SC/M98/RW11 presented to the IWC Special Meeting of the Scientific Committee, June 2000, in Adelaide, Australia.

 

Monks G.G., McMillan A.D. and St. Claire D.E. 2001. Nuu-chah-nulth whaling: Archaeological insights into antiquity, species preferences, and cultural importance. Arctic Anthropology. 38(1): 60-81.

 

Moore S.E., Waite J.M., Mazzuca L.L. and Hobbs R.C. 2000. Mysticete whale abundance and observations of prey associations on the central Bering Sea shelf. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. 2(3): 227-234.

 

Munger L., Moore S., Hildebrand J., Wiggins S. and McDonald M. 2003. Calls of North Pacific right whales recorded in the southeast Bering Sea. ABSTRACT: Marine Science in the Northeast Pacific: Science for Resource Dependent Communities, Session EVOS/NPRB-4: Birds and Mammals, Joint Scientific Symposium, Hotel Captain Cook, Anchorage, Alaska, 13-17 January 2003.

 

National Marine Fisheries Service. 1991. Recovery Plan for the Northern Right Whale (Eubalaena glacialis). Prepared by the Right Whale Recovery Team for the National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, Maryland. 86 pp.

 

National Research Council. 1996. The Bering Sea ecosystem. National Research Council, Washington, DC.

 

New England Aquarium (NEAq).  Unpublished data from the North Atlantic Right Whale Consortium Photographic Identification database.

 

Nemoto T. 1957. Food of baleen whales in the northern Pacific. Scientific Report of the Whales Research Institute. 12: 33-89.

 

Nemoto T. 1959. Food of baleen whales with reference to whale movements. Scientific Report of the Whales Research Institute. 14:149-290.

 

Nemoto T. 1962. Food of baleen whales collected in recent Japanese whaling expeditions. Scientific Report of the Whales Research Institute. 16: 89-103.

 

Nichol L.M., Gregr E.J., Flinn R., Ford J.K.B., Gurney R., Michaluk L. and Peacock A.  2002. British Columbia commercial whaling catch data 1908 to 1967: A detailed description of the B.C historical whaling database. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2371. 77pp.

 

Ohsumi S. and Wada S. 1974. Report of the Scientific Committee, Annex N. Status of whale stocks in the North Pacific, 1972. Rep. int. Whal. Commn. 24: 114-126.

 

Omura H. 1986. History of right whale catches in the waters around Japan. Rep. int. Whal. Commn. (Special Issue) 10: 35-41.

 

O'Shea T.J. and Brownell R.L. Jr. 1994. Organochlorine and metal contaminants in baleen whales: a review and evaluation of conservation implications. The Science of the Total Environment. 154:179-200.

 

Payne M., Wiley D., Young S., Pittman S., Clapham P. and Jossi J. 1990. Recent fluctuations in the abundance of baleen whales in the southern Gulf of Maine in relation to changes in selected prey. Fishery Bulletin 88: 687-696.

 

Pike G.C. and MacAskie I.B. 1969. Marine Mammals of British Columbia. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada. Bull 171. 54pp.

 

Polovina J.J., Mitchum G.T. and Evans G.T. 1995. Decadal and basin-scale variation in mixed layer depth and the impact on biological production in the central and North Pacific, 1960-1988. Deep Sea Research. 42: 1201-1716.

 

Ralls K., Ballou J.D. and Templeton A. 1988. Estimates of lethal equivalents and the cost of inbreeding in mammals. Conserv. Biol. 2: 185-193.

 

Ray G.C. 1981. The role of large organisms. pp. 397-413 in A.R. Longhurst (ed.), Analysis of marine ecosystems. Academic Press, London.

 

Reeves R.R. and Leatherwood S. 1985. Sightings of right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) in the eastern North Pacific. Paper SC/37/PS3 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, June 1985 (unpublished). 7pp.

 

Rice D.W. and Fiscus C.H. 1968. Right whales in the south-eastern North Pacific. Norsk Hvalfangsttid. 57(5): 105-107.

 

Richardson W.J., Greene C.R., Malme C.I. and Thomsen D.H. 1995. Marine mammals and noise. Academic Press, San Diego.

 

Roemmich D. and McGowan J. 1995. Climate warming and the decline of zooplankton in the California current. Science. 267: 1324-1326.

 

Rosenbaum, H.C., Brownell, R.L., Brown, M.W., Schaeff, C., Portway, V., White, B.N., Malik, S., Pastene, L.A., Patenaude, N.J., Baker, C.S., Goto, M., Best, P.B., Clapham, P.J., Hamilton, P., Moore, M., Payne, R., Rowntree, V., Tynan, C.T., Bannister, J.L., and DeSalle, R. 2000a. World-wide genetic differentiation of Eubalaena: questioning the number of right whale species. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1793-802.

 

Rosenbaum H.C., Egan M.G., Clapham P.J., Brownell R.L., Brown M.W., While B.N., Malik S., Walsh P.D. and DeSalle R. 2000b. Utility of North Atlantic right whale museum specimens in assessing changes in genetic diversity. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1837-1842.

 

Ross P.S., Ellis G.M., Ikonomou M.G., Barrett-Lennard L.G. and Addison R.F. 2000. High PCB concentrations in free-ranging Pacific killer whales, Orcinus orca: effects of age, sex and dietary preference. Mar.Pollut.Bull. 40: 504-515.

 

Ross P.S. 2002a. The role of immunotoxic environmental contaminants in facilitating the emergence of infectious diseases in marine mammals. HERA 8: 277-292.

 

Ross P.S. 2002b. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and outbreaks of disease in marine mammals. In Marine Pollution and Biodiversity. United Nations University Press, Tokyo.

 

Rowlett R.A., Green G.A., Bowlby C.E. and Smultea M.A. 1994. The first photographic documentation of a northern right whale off Washington State. Northwest. Nat. 75: 102-104.

 

Scarff  J.E. 1986. Historic and present distribution of the right whale, Eubalaena glacialis, in the eastern North Pacific south of 50N and east of 180W. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm. (Special Issue 10): 43-63.

 

Scarff J.E. 1991. Historic distribution and abundance of the right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) in the North Pacific, Bering Sea, Sea of Okhotsk and Sea of Japan from the Maury Whale Charts. Rep. int. Whal. Commn. 41: 467-489.

 

Scarff, J.E.  2001.  Preliminary estimates of whaling-induced mortality in the 19th century North Pacific right whale (Euablaena japonica) fishery, adjusting for struck-but-lost whales and non-American whaling.  Journal of Cetacean Research and Management (special issue 2): 261-268.

 

Schaeff C.M., Kraus S.D., Brown M.W. and White B.N. 1993. Assessment of the population structure of western North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) based on sighting and mtDNA data. Can. J. Zool. 71: 339-345.

 

Schaeff C.M., Kraus S.D., Brown M.W., Perkins J.S., Payne R. and White B.N. 1997. Comparison of genetic variability of North and South Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena), using DNA fingerprinting. Can. J. Zool. 75: 1073-1080.

 

Silber G.K. and Clapham P.J. 2001. Updated recovery plan for the western North Atlantic right whale, Eubalaena glacialis. Draft. 104 pp.

 

Todd S., Stevick P., Lien J., Marques F. and Ketten D. 1996. Behavioural effects of exposure to underwater explosions in humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 74:1661-1672.

 

Tomilin A.G. 1957. Mammals of the USSR and Adjacent Countries. Mammals of Eastern Europe and Adjacent Countries. Vol. IX. Cetacea. 717 pp.

 

Tormosov D.D, Mikhalev Y.A., Best P.B., Zemsky V.A., Sekiguchi K. and Brownell Jr. R.L. 1998. Soviet catches of southern right whales, Eubalaena australis, 1951-1971; biological data and conservation implications. Biol. Conserv. 86(2): 185-197.

 

Townsend C.H. 1935. The distribution of certain whales as shown by logbook records of American whaleships. Zoologica (NY).19(1-2): 1-50+6 maps.

 

Tynan C.T. 1999. Redistribution of cetaceans in the Southeast Bering Sea relative to anomalous oceanographic conditions during the 1997 El Nino. PICES Scientific Report. 10: 115-117.

 

Venrick E.L. 1994. Scales of variability in a stable environment: phytoplankton in the central North Pacific. Chapter 10 in T.M. Powell and JH. Steele (eds.), Ecological Time Series. Chapman and Hall, New York.

 

Venrick E.L., McGowan J.A., Cayan D.R. and Hayward T.L. 1987. Climate and chlorophyll a: Long-term trends in the central North Pacific Ocean. Science. 238: 70-72.

 

Vladimirov V.L. 1994. Recent distribution and abundance of whales in Russian Far-Eastern seas. Russian J. Mar. Biol. 20: 1-9.

 

Vladimirov V.L. 2000. Present distribution, population numbers and structure in whales of the Far East seas. pp. 104-122 in A.V. Yablokov and V.A. Zemsky (eds.), Soviet Whaling Data (1949-1979). Centre for Russian Environmental Policy, Moscow. 408 pp.

 

Wada S. 1976. Indices of abundance of large-sized whales in the North Pacific in the 1974 whaling season. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm. 26: 382-391.

 

Wada S. 1975. Report of the Scientific Committee, Annex L. Indices of abundance of large-sized whales in the North Pacific in 1973 whaling season. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm. 25: 129-165.

 

Wada S. 1977. Indices of abundance of large-sized whales in the North Pacific in 1975 whaling season. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm. 27: 189-194.

 

Wada S. 1979. Indices of abundance of large-sized whales in the North Pacific in 1977 whaling season. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm. 29: 253-264.

 

Yablokov A.V. 1994. Validity of whaling data. Nature. 367:108.

 

Zemsky V.A., Berzin A.A., Mikhalev Y.A. and Tormosov D.D. 1995. Report to the sub-committee on Southern Hemisphere baleen whales. Appendix 3. Soviet Antarctic pelagic whaling after WWII: Review of catch data. Rep. Int. Whal. Commn. 45: 131-135.

 

 

 


 

Prepared by: North Pacific Right Whale Recovery Team

 

Date Completed: July 2003

 

Recommended Citation:

 

O, Miriam and J. Ford. 2003. Draft National Recovery Strategy for the North Pacific Right Whale in Pacific Canadian waters.  Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 45pp.

10.1    Recovery Team Members

 

Bob Brownell

Senior Scientist for International Protected Resources. SW Fisheries Science Centre, Pacific Grove California, NMFS Phone: (831) 648-5338.

Email: Robert.Brownell@noaa.gov

 

Carole Eros

Recovery Plan Coordinator - Pacific Region. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 200-401 Burrard St. Vancouver BC, V6C 3S4. Tel. 604-666-3610. Fax. 604-666-3341. Email: erosc@pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca.

 

Graeme Ellis

Science – Pacific Region. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Pacific Biological Station, 3190 Hammond Bay Rd. Nanaimo, BC V9T 6N7. Tel. 250-756-7245, Fax. 250-756-7053.

Email: ellisg@pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca

 

Greg Silber

Coordinator, Large Whale Recovery Activities. NMFS, Office of Protected Resources. 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD. 20910. Phone: 301-713-2322.

Email: greg.silber@noaa.gov

 

Jerry Conway

Species at Risk Coordinator, Maritimes. Fisheries & Oceans Canada. 1 Challenger Drive, Dartmouth, NS B2Y 4A2. Tel. 902-426-6947. Email: conwayj@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca.

 

John Calambokidis

Research Biologist;  COSEWIC Marine Mammal Subcommittee member. Cascadia Research, 218½ West Fourth Ave., Olympia, Washington. 98501. Phone: 360-943-7325. Email: calambokidis@cascadiaresearch.org

 

John Ford

Marine Mammal Scientist, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Science Branch, Conservation Biology Section, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, BC, V9T 6N7. phone 250 -729-8375. Email: fordjo@pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca

 

Lance Barrett-Lennard

Marine Mammal Scientist. Vancouver Aquarium Marine Science Center. P.O. Box 3232 Vancouver BC V6B 3X8. Phone: 604-659-3428. Email: barlenl@vanaqua.org

 

Marilyn Joyce

Marine Mammal Coordinator – Pacific Region. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 200-401 Burrard St. Vancouver BC, V6C 3S4. Tel. 604-666-9965, Fax. 604-666-3441.

Email: joycem@dfo-mpo.gc.ca.

 

Miriam O

Cetacean Biologist, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Science Branch, Conservation Biology Section, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, BC, V9T 6N7. phone 250 -756-7253.

Email: omiriam@pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca

 

Moira Brown

Right whale scientist. Center for Coastal Studies, Box 1036, Provincetown, MA 02657. Phone: 508-487-3623 ext. 111. Email: mbrown@coastalstudies.org

 

Phil Clapham

 

Large cetacean scientist. Large Whale Biology Program. Northeast Fisheries Science Center, 166 Water St. Woods Hole, MA 02543. Phone: 508 495-2316.

Email: pclapham@whsun1.wh.whoi.edu.

 

Scott Wallace

Science Advisor. Sierra Club. 9580 Gleadle Rd., Black Creek, BC. V9J 161. Phone: 250-337-8521. Email:scottw@island.net.

 

Sue Moore

Director, National Marine Mammal Laboratory. NMFS, Alaska Fisheries Science Center. 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle WA. 98115. Phone: 206-526-4047.

Email: sue.moore@noaa.gov

 

10.2    External Peer Reviewers

 

Randall Reeves

27 Chandler Lane, Hudson, QC

J0P 1H0. Ph: 415-703-1440,

Email: jscarff@igc.apc.org

 

Jim Scarff

1807 Martin Luther King #A, Berkeley, CA 94709. Ph: 450-458-7383,

Email: rrreeves@total.net

 

 

 

North Pacific Right Whales are an aquatic species under federal jurisdiction, managed by Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

 

The draft Right Whale Recovery Strategy was made available publicly via the Fisheries and Oceans Canada webpage (http://www-comm.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/pages/consultations/rightwhale/default_e.htm.  Notice of the web posting was made via a DFO news release.  In collaboration with the Vancouver Aquarium Marine Science Centre a news release was issued via Aquanews and information posted on the Vancouver Aquarium’s webpage (http://www.vanaqua.org/).  The document was also distributed through an international listserv via the Marine Mammal mailing list (‘Marmam’).  DFO also requested input directly from other Federal government departments and non-government organizations who may have an interest in right whales including Parks Canada and WWF Canada.  Peer reviews were also sought from several experts.