Flag of Canada Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canada
Skip All Navigation (access key: 2)Skip Top Navigation (access key: 1)  Français  Contact Us  Help  Search  Canada Site
 About Us  Facts  Infocentre  A-Z Index  DFO Home
 What's New  Events  Site Map  Links  Home
CANADIAN WATERS
Infocentre  

Home  Infocentre  Policy and Legislation  FHM Policy


Previous PagePrevious Page Table of Contents Next PageNext Page

Chapter 3
Integrated Planning for Fish Habitat Management

3.1 Introduction

The net gain objective and three supporting goals of this policy are being implemented by a series of strategies that are outlined in the following chapter. In addition to this, improved integration is needed to ensure that the fish habitat plans are implemented with sufficient knowledge of the current and future demands of other natural resource users. This can be accomplished by utilizing existing processes and continuing to develop regularized procedures as required, in close cooperation with provinces, territories and other sectors engaged in resource utilization and management, to consult and plan for future resource management and use.

Furthermore, it will not be sufficient to proceed with policy implementation without fully integrating fish habitat requirements with management objectives for the fisheries resources. This will allow meaningful priorities to be established and will lead to more credible delivery of all elements of the fisheries management program

This chapter outlines the conceptual approaches that must be tested, implemented and further developed to allow for the fuller integration of fish habitat management in multiple resource management decisions.

3.2 Integration with Other Resource Sector Objectives

The Department recognizes that natural resource interests such as the forest, fishing, mining, energy, and agricultural sectors make legitimate demands on water resources, and that ways must be found to reconcile differences of opinion on the best use of those resources. Effective integration of resource sector objectives, including fisheries, will therefore involve cooperation and consultation with other government agencies and natural resource users. For example, fish habitat management plans on a local or regional basis should be developed in such a way as to allow discussion with other stakeholders. In particular, in those jurisdictions where the Department of Fisheries and Oceans manages fisheries directly, the Department will seek ways to participate in the resource planning and management initiatives of provincial, territorial and municipal governments, other federal departments and other resource users where applicable. In other jurisdictions, integrated planning activities will be consistent with any federal-provincial administrative agreement for habitat management. Examples of initiatives in which the Department has been involved in recent years include (a) planning for multiple land and water use in a number of west coast estuaries and in the Nicola River Basin in British Columbia; (b) planning for port development on the east and west coasts; (c) planning for resource use in Passamoquoddy Bay, New Brunswick; (d) preparation for Northern Land Use Planning in the territories; and (e) implementation of coastal fisheries/forestry guidelines in British Columbia.

In this way, and in keeping with the integrated resource planning strategy described in the next chapter, fish habitat management plans will be reviewed and discussed, and, where possible, integrated with the objectives and plans of other resource managers and users.

  Top of page

Four men standing near cleared forest area, looking at plans

3.3 Integration of Habitat Needs with Fish Management Objectives

The essential step of integrating various fish habitat requirements with the fisheries resources they support, must be undertaken and made available in a form that is understood by officials within Fisheries and Oceans, as well as by other agencies and non-government groups. The Department has explored the conceptual basis for this integration and has concluded that fish habitat management area plans or fish habitat/stock production plans, or the equivalent, should be developed to guide the implementation of this policy.

These plans would be relatively straightforward to implement if fish stock production objectives and allocation plans were available for all of the nation's important fisheries resources. While this information is commonly available from the responsible fisheries agency, or can be developed by that agency, it is not always possible for fisheries managers to either identify discrete fish stocks for allocation purposes or to quantify production targets for stocks and geographic areas.

Given the above factors, the integration of fish habitat requirements with fisheries management objectives to reflect the important supporting role played by the habitat program could be developed in a variety of ways. The method used will depend on the information available on fish production from particular areas and on the complexity of fish harvesting for mixed stocks. If both the stocks and the fisheries are discrete, it should be possible to derive production targets on which to base habitat management plans that would support the maintenance and growth of those fisheries in particular areas.

A different approach will have to be taken where the fish produced in particular areas contribute to a mixed-stock fishery. In such instances, where stock-specific fish production targets cannot be provided by fisheries managers, estimates of those targets may be based on habitat availability, its quality, any competing pre-emptive uses and historic fish production levels. This will form the basis for the fish habitat management plan for that geographic area.

The plans developed in this way will be used to define those priority areas where this habitat policy will apply and to assist the Department in its efforts to measure program performance. In addition, the habitat management plans will be used as the basis for discussion with other resource managers and users, during the integration process described in the preceding section.


Previous PagePrevious Page Table of Contents Next PageNext Page