|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABOUT...ACROSS CANADAAND...RESOURCES |
DFO's Aquaculture Action Plan
Interim Guide To Information Requirements For Environmental
Assessment Of Marine Shellfish Aquaculture Projects
|
BMP | Best Management Practices |
CDC | Conservation Data Centres |
CEA Agency | Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency |
CEAA | Canadian Environmental Assessment Act |
CEPA | Canadian Environmental Protection Act |
CFIA | Canadian Food Inspection Agency |
cm | centimetre |
cm/s | centimetres per second |
COSEWIC | Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada |
CSSP | Canadian Shellfish Sanitation Program |
CWS | Canadian Wildlife Service |
DFO | Fisheries and Oceans Canada |
EA | Environmental Assessment |
Eh | oxidation reduction potential |
EMP | Environmental Monitoring Plan |
FEAI | Federal Environmental Assessment Index |
GPS | Global Positioning System |
HHWLT | Higher high water large tide |
LLWLT | Lower low water large tide |
m2 | square metres |
MPA | Marine Protected Area |
mV NHE | millivolts (Normal Hydrogen Electrode) |
NAD | North American Datum |
NWPA | Navigable Waters Protection Act |
POM | Particulate organic matter |
RA | Responsible Authority |
SPM | Suspended particulate matter |
VEC | Valued Ecosystem Component |
Environmental assessment (EA) is an important planning and decision-making tool. It is an organized information-gathering process used to identify and understand the potential effects of proposed projects on the environment (land, water, air, organic and inorganic matter, living organisms and the interactions among these components). Environmental effects are identified, assessed, and where possible, plans are made to minimize these effects before irrevocable decisions are made. Consideration of potential environmental effects early in the planning stages of a project promotes better planning and can save time and money by proactively addressing potential issues before they become problems.
The Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) was promulgated in January of 1995. As the legal basis for the federal EA process, CEAA sets out the responsibilities of the federal government and the procedures for carrying out the EA of projects requiring the federal government's involvement or approval.
CEAA has five stated purposes:
In applying CEAA, the following guiding principles are used:
A CEAA environmental assessment is required for an aquaculture project when there are both a "responsible authority" and a "project".
A responsible authority (RA) is a federal government department or agency that is required to ensure that an EA of a project is conducted under CEAA. A federal government department or agency becomes an RA for a project when it proposes to provide support for or approval of a project, in the form of:
The RA:
A project is defined by CEAA as either:
Most shellfish and many shellfish aquaculture initiatives will fall within the first category of "project" described above. However, it is important to confirm that it is a project before beginning to collect the information identified in this guide.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is required to ensure that an EA is conducted for a marine aquaculture project when DFO proposes to issue:
The Habitat Management Program of DFO usually fulfills this EA responsibility for the Department and it will confirm, on a case by case basis, whether or not a CEAA assessment is required for the project.
There are four types of environmental assessments under CEAA:
The majority of marine aquaculture projects requiring an EA will undergo a screening, which is a systematic approach to documenting the environmental effects of a proposed project and determining the need to minimize or mitigate these effects; to modify the project plan; or to recommend further assessment through mediation or a panel review.
The general CEAA screening process is outlined in Figure 1 (15 KB).
Subsection 16(1) of CEAA identifies the factors that must be considered in the screening of a project.
"16.(1) Every screening or comprehensive study of a project and every mediation or assessment by a review panel shall include a consideration of the following factors:Environmental effects are specifically defined under CEAA as:
whether any such change occurs within or outside Canada.
Environment is defined under CEAA as the components of the Earth, including:
The project and environmental information provided to Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) by the proponent will be reviewed to assess potential environmental effects. Other federal departments (such as Environment Canada, Health Canada, Canadian Heritage, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) may be consulted and requested to review and comment on information relative to their area(s) of expertise to assist DFO in the EA.
After review and assessment of the potential environmental effects of a project, the RA must make a conclusion about whether the project is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects, after taking into consideration the implementation of mitigation measures based upon the following
Conclusion |
Action |
The project is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects. |
DFO can consider whether to issue the NWPA approval or Fisheries Act
authorization, as appropriate.
The RA is required to ensure the implementation of the mitigation measures that were identified in reaching this conclusion, as well as any followup program, deemed necessary. |
The project is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects that cannot be justified in the circumstances. | DFO does not issue an NWPA approval or Fisheries Act authorisation. |
It is uncertain whether the project is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects. | DFO refers the project to the federal Minister of Environment for mediation or assessment by a review panel. |
The project is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects that may be justified in the circumstances. | DFO refers the project to the federal Minister of Environment for mediation or assessment by a review panel. |
Public concerns warrant a reference to a mediator or a review panel. | DFO refers the project to the federal Minister of Environment for mediation or assessment by a review panel. |
The summary of the EA conducted, including the conclusion on whether the project is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects, will be summarized in DFO's EA (screening) report.
The conclusion under CEAA provides direction of whether DFO can provide the NWPA approval and/or the Fisheries Act authorisation as noted above.
A follow-up program may be implemented to verify the accuracy of the environmental assessment of a project and to determine the effectiveness of any measures taken to mitigate the adverse environmental effects of the project. The proponent may be required to conduct some monitoring to support the follow-up program.
CEAA imposes two main obligations on RAs with respect to the public registry:
A public registry must be maintained in respect of every project for which an EA is conducted, regardless of whether the project undergoes a screening, comprehensive study, panel review or mediation. The RA is responsible for maintaining the public registry throughout the entire EA (screening or comprehensive study) of a project. During mediation or a review panel, the Public Registry is maintained by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.
Although there are some exceptions, CEAA requires that a public registry must contain all records produced, collected, or submitted with respect to the EA of a project. Regional DFO Habitat Management officials will maintain the public registry for marine aquaculture projects undergoing an EA requiring an NWPA approval or Fisheries Act authorisation.
One of the purposes of CEAA is to ensure that there is an opportunity for public participation in the EA process. The public can participate in an EA in several ways:
CEAA established the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the CEA Agency) to administer and promote the federal EA process policies and practices. The CEA Agency operates independently from any other federal department or agency, with its president reporting directly to the federal Minister of the Environment.
The CEA Agency does not conduct individual environmental assessments (EAs are undertaken by responsible authorities), however the CEA Agency has several important roles, including:
The CEA Agency has prepared various documents related to the application of CEAA for the use of the public, proponents and federal departments. These can be obtained from regional or headquarters CEA Agency offices or through the internet at: http://www.ceaa.gc.ca/index_e.htm.
Other federal departments, such as Environment Canada, may be consulted and requested to review and comment on information relative to their area(s) of expertise to assist DFO in the environmental assessment of an aquaculture project.
Environment Canada has prepared guidance material on the environmental assessment of aquaculture projects relative to its areas of expertise. This material may be found at: http://www.atl.ec.gc.ca/assessment/facts.html.
The information identified in this section is to be collected by the proponent and compiled in the form of a report to be provided to the DFO assessor responsible for the environmental assessment of the aquaculture project.
For Bottom Culture
Note: If beach modifications are proposed (e.g., addition or removal of substrate, creation of rock berms/windrows), it may be necessary to obtain an authorization under subsection 35(2) of the Fisheries Act from Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO.In addition, there may be provincial requirements which must be met. Consult DFO and provincial authorities about these requirements.
For Near-Bottom Culture
Note: A specific permit under provincial or federal legislation may be required for such works/activities. Contact the provincial agency(ies) responsible and DFO Habitat Management or Navigable Waters Protection Program for additional information.
Note: Mitigation measures (measures to mitigate) are actions taken to avoid, reduce or minimize effects on the environment. These may include such actions as timing activities to avoid migration times of aquatic species or conducting in-water activities during low tide or isolating in-water activities to reduce habitat disruption.
Note: The transfer of fish (including shellfish) from one location to another requires a review by DFO (and perhaps the provincial) Introduction and Transfers Committee, and a licence pursuant to section 56 of the Fisheries (General) Regulations. Seed and brood stock imported inter-provincially or internationally must be certified disease free.
Further details will be required for the Introduction and Transfers Committee.
Note: The Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) prohibits the deliberate disposal of any substance at sea unless the substance is specified on Schedule 5 of CEPA. Deliberate disposal at sea of specified substances requires a Disposal At Sea permit from Environment Canada under section 127 of CEPA. Before being granted such a permit, the proponent will have to show that all other disposal or recycling and reuse options have been evaluated and an extensive review by Environment Canada will be required.
Predator Control
Note: Destruction of "fish" by means other than fishing may require an authorization under section 32 of the Fisheries Act from DFO.
Note: Environment Canada`s Canadian Wildlife Service (CWS) has a "Policy for the Issuance of Scare Permits for the Aquaculture Industry". To minimize impacts on migratory birds while protecting aquaculture operations against depredation of their crop, this policy places strong emphasis on siting considerations and early avoidance of problems. Contact CWS for information on this policy or go to: http//www.cws-scf.ec.gc.ca/1_pdf/Aqua.pdf.
Note: Proponents should also contact DFO and provincial wildlife agencies with regard to their predator control policies and regulatory requirements.
Anti-fouling
Hazardous & Human Waste Materials
Note: It is recommended that proponents meet with DFO officials early in the project planning process. Such a meeting will serve to help identify site-specific information requirements, environmental factors to be considered, and the anticipated level of effort and detail that may be required in collecting and compiling information for the EA. It is an opportunity to direct the information gathering process and to focus the efforts of both the proponents and the reviewers.
Note: Some government agencies provide oceanographic data on their websites. For example, Oceans Science website for Maritimes Region (www.mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/science/ocean/home.html) and Pacific Region (www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/sci/osap/) includes such information as ocean currents, water temperatures, salinity. As well, information is available on the St. Lawrence Observatory site (http://www.osl.gc.ca). It may be beneficial to check such sites.
Note: As a starting point, check the Shellfish Growing Area Classification Index at www.ns.ec.gc.ca/epb/sfish/maps/class.html for the East Coast and www.pyr.ec.gc.ca/ep/shellfish/shell_e.htm for the West Coast. Contact DFO or Environment Canada for more information. Note that this information is not available in Quebec.
Note: Sampling guidelines/protocols for Currents and Benthos may be obtained from DFO - Habitat Management.
Current description should
be based upon the following:
Weak < 2 cm/s
Medium 2-10 cm/s
Strong > 10 cm/s
Note for the following section in particular, various factors may affect the level of information and monitoring required as outlined in the Preface. Consult with DFO to confirm whether this information is required for your project.
Note: For this section, a number of resources should be consulted to collect information. These may include an underwater video survey, commercial and recreational fishers, aboriginal groups, Fishery Officers, local fishery organizations, other local residents, etc. A great deal of information concerning fishery resources is available to the public through local regional development authorities. Ensure that all information transfer is documented and attached. It is the responsibility of the proponent to demonstrate a reasonable effort to collect information. Provide details about the sources of the information (contact name, agency, phone number, etc.).
Standard Sediment Grain Size Fractions
Boulder > 256 mm |
Sand 2 - 0.062 mm Silt 0.062 - 0.004 mm Clay < 0.004 mm |
Note: Under section 34 of the Fisheries Act, fish habitat is defined as "spawning grounds and nursery, rearing, food supply and migration areas on which fish depend directly or indirectly in order to carry out their life processes".
Note: Under section 2 of the Fisheries Act, the definition of fish includes "...shellfish, crustaceans, marine animals and..., the eggs, sperm, spawn, larvae, spat and juvenile stages of fish, shellfish, crustaceans and marine animals".
Note: Contact the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) at www.cosewic.gc.ca or Conservation Data Centres (CDC) at http://www.abi-canada.ca.
Note: Information is available at http://www.cws-scf.ec.gc.ca/cwshom_e.html or contact the regional offices of the Canadian Wildlife Service (Environment Canada).
In addition, also consult Environment Canada's Environmental Assessment of Shellfish Aquaculture Projects: Guidelines for Consideration of Environment Canada Expertise at http://www.atl.ec.gc.ca/assessment/facts.html.
Note: Under CEAA, the RA is required to consider any effect of any change that a project may cause in the environment, including any effect of any such change on socio-economic conditions.
Note: Under CEAA, the RA is required to consider any effect of any change that a project may cause in the environment on the current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes by aboriginal persons.
Note: For information on Aboriginal groups, contact either the First Nations Tribal Councils or Band Council identified at www.johnco.com/firstnat OR the appropriate regional office of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada at www.inac.gc.ca.
Note: Parks Canada, Canadian Heritage and/or a local natural history museum, or other cultural agencies in the area may be able to assist.
Note: Contact DFO, Parks Canada and provincial authorities for information.
Note: Environmental effect also includes: any change to the project that may be caused by the environment.
Note: Under CEAA, DFO is required to consider any cumulative environmental effects that are likely to result from the project in combination with other projects or activities that have been or will be carried out.
The concept of cumulative effects is the recognition of the complex ways in which the environmental effects of individual projects and activities interact and combine with each other over time and distance. Thus, to address cumulative environmental effects in environmental assessments requires thinking cumulatively. This means giving consideration to: (1) the temporal and geographic boundaries of the assessment; and (2) the interactions among the environmental effects of the project, other existing and future aquaculture and non-aquaculture projects and activities.
The mapping exercise specified in Section 2.1.2, Question 5, as well as the other information provided by the proponent,, will serve to identify potential environmental effects that exist within the 5-kilometre circle around and beyond the proposed development site. The actual area for potential cumulative environmental effects around a proposed site may vary depending upon the physical characteristics of the location. Based on information provided and other available information, DFO will assess the scope, likelihood and significance of adverse cumulative environmental effects associated with the proposed shellfish aquaculture project. The proponent may be requested to provide additional input to assist with the assessment of cumulative environmental effects.
As with environmental assessment in general, there is no one approach or methodology for all assessments of cumulative environmental effects. Different circumstances, such as location of project and type of potential environmental effects will dictate appropriate methodologies. Where information may be lacking, qualitative approaches and best professional judgement are used.
As part of this exercise, the RA may conclude that a follow-up program (monitoring) is required to verify the accuracy of the environmental assessment and to determine the effectiveness of mitigation measures implemented. The proponent will be required to comply with the monitoring program, including carrying out any sampling required and ensuring that monitoring results are provided to DFO.
The project and environmental information identified in Part 2 are to be provided to the regional DFO Habitat Management assessor responsible for the environmental assessment of the project, i.e., the same official who met with the proponent to confirm information requirements for the project prior to information collection.
As outlined in Figure 1, CEAA Screening Process, the DFO assessor will review the information to determine what environmental effects may occur, and whether these are adverse and significant. The assessor may request expert advice from within DFO, as well as from other federal departments to conduct the assessment.
In some circumstances, additional discussion with the proponent may be required to clarify information or to discuss further information that may be required to continue the assessment. Such information may include mitigation measures to reduce or minimize harmful environmental effects identified in the assessment since such mitigation can reduce some harmful effects to the point that they are not significant. To this end and to be proactive, a proponent may identify potentially harmful environmental effects in the information submission and identify mitigation measures that the proponent is prepared to implement to minimize those effects. This may reduce the extent of discussion required between DFO and the proponent after information is submitted and aid the DFO assessor in determining whether effects are significant.
In some cases, proponents may also indicate their opinions and supporting rationale on the significance of adverse environmental effects of their proposed projects in the form of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Although not a requirement of this guide, such an EIS may assist DFO in reaching conclusions about environmental effects. However, it is important to note that although the proponent is providing an opinion, it is DFO's opinion, as the RA, which will represent the conclusion of the CEAA environmental assessment.
After the consideration of the implementation of mitigation measures, the DFO assessor will determine whether the proposed project is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects and will summarize the assessment in a CEAA screening report.
Further to the completion of the environmental assessment, a decision will be made on whether DFO will issue the required approval under NWPA approval and/or authorisation under the Fisheries Act. The proponent will be informed of this decision.
Good communication between DFO and the proponent will help ensure that the assessment is completed efficiently and effectively.
Additional information is available from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency's website: http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/0011/0001/0008/guide3_e.htm
After review and assessment of the potential environmental effects of a project, DFO, as the RA, must determine whether the project is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects, after taking into consideration the implementation of mitigation measures. This determination is central to the concept and practice of environmental assessment and is a requirement under CEAA. A three-step framework has been suggested to RAs to facilitate this determination:
The most common way that an RA determines whether a project's environmental effects are adverse is to compare the quality of the existing environment with the predicted quality of the environment once the project is in place. Environmental monitoring information collected over time and/or distance before the project is in place could be auseful tool to identify the conditions of the existing environment. It also implies knowledge of normal baseline environmental conditions. As this guide requires, the proponent is expected to collect and synthesize the available information on baseline environmental quality. In some cases, where there are gaps in information, the proponent may also be requested to collect new information, depending on the size and nature of the project.
There are several criteria that are taken into account in deciding whether the adverse environmental effects are significant. For assessing the significance of potential effects resulting from a proposed project, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency recommends consideration of the following criteria:
The significance of the adverse environmental effects of a project can be determined using environmental standards, guidelines and objectives or, alternatively, by using quantitative risk assessment. The latter approach assumes that there is an "acceptable" level of risk. Where there are no relevant environmental standards, guidelines, or objectives and quantitative risk assessment is not possible, the RA may apply a qualitative approach based on best professional judgement.
After determining whether predicted effects are adverse and significant, the RA must make a determination on the likelihood of the significant adverse environmental effects. This determination is typically based on the probability of occurrence.
Table 1 identifies various effects relative to components of the environment (sometimes referred to as Valued Ecosystem Components - VECs) which could be affected by marine shellfish aquaculture operations, as well as possible mitigation measures and monitoring. This list is provided to illustrate examples of these issues and should not be interpreted to be exhaustive. Mitigation measures identified in Table 1 are general approaches and other site-specific measures will likely be required.
Some or all of these effects may be considered in DFO's environmental assessment of a marine shellfish aquaculture project. The information provided by the proponent will assist in determining the adversity, significance and likelihood of these effects.
Table 1: Potential Environmental Effects from Marine Shellfish Aquaculture Operations
A. Marine Habitat (including water quality) |
||||
Project Activity | Potential Environmental Effects | Possible Mitigation | Significance of Adverse Environmental Effects | Follow-up Monitoring |
Construction and Operation | Reduced water quality and effects to water column flora
and/or fauna. Organic loading smothering or alteration of habitat. Impacts on the health of local marine organisms. Reduction of phytoplankton in the ecosystem. |
Avoid of low-water exchange areas for large projects
(intense culture). Minimise in-water activities to reduced release of sediments and sediment-laden water into any waterbody. Time in-water activities to avoid migration and spawning windows. No foreshore modifications without consulting with DFO. Location of sites where current and flow provide adequate movement of nutrients. Catch nets or double socking to catch fall-off. |
Determination of significance of adverse environmental effects to be made by DFO. | Established monitoring program. |
Refuse Disposal | Waste accumulation in the water column and on benthic
habitat. Degradation of water quality. |
Solid wastes to be removed from the site and disposed
of in an approved manner (no disposal of materials to the water column). Periodic removal of all garbage (e.g., ropes, socks) from site and disposal in approved landfill. Catch nets or double socking to catch fall-off. |
Determination of significance of adverse environmental effects to be made by DFO. | |
Accidental events/spills (e.g., fuel, hydraulic fluid and lubricants) | Degradation of water quality. Release of hazardous materials. Effects to shellfish health and production. |
Use of less toxic alternatives to hazardous products.
Development of Emergency-Spill Response Plan. Designation of areas for storage and refueling with proper containment. Training of workers in the safe and effective use of fuel, lubricants. |
||
Debris accumulation of the seabed | Alteration of the substrate by smothering. | Catch nets or double socking to catch fall-off. Waste projects to be removed from the site and disposal at a suitable location. |
||
Biofouling control measures (physical removal and treatment of equipment) | Degradation of water quality (increased particulates, toxicity to some species). | Use of appropriate defouling methods and proper
disposal of waste. As appropriate, allow fouling organisms to be released back into suitable habitat, rather than allowing to "dry out". Land- or boat-based defouling. |
||
Placement and removal of anchoring system | Physical disturbance to benthic habitat. | Minimize extent of in-water activities. Provide minimum buffer zone around sensitive habitats like eelgrass, saltmarsh areas and kelp beds. |
B. Fisheries Resources |
||||
Project Activity | Potential Environmental Effects | Possible Mitigation | Significance of Adverse Environmental Effects | Follow-up Monitoring |
Construction and Operation | Alteration of fish migration patterns. | Location of sites away from important migration routes.
Meet all siting guidelines |
Determination of significance of adverse environmental effects to be made by DFO. |
C. Wildlife (including birds, crabs, mammals and species at risk, etc.) |
||||
Project Activity | Potential Environmental Effects | Possible Mitigation | Significance of Adverse Environmental Effects | Follow-up Monitoring |
Construction and presence of infrastructure (e.g., physical presence, noise, disturbance, attraction) and bird deterrent programs | Predator attraction to sites as food source. Alteration of staging and distribution patterns. Disturbance to shorebirds and displacement or reduced access to traditional areas of use. Entanglement/drowning of birds in predator nets. |
Site selection to reduce predator interest and avoid
areas of high concentration of migratory birds. Proper on-site maintenance and cleanliness. Predator management plans. Mesh sizes of predator nets should be in accordance with recommendations of Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada. |
Determination of significance of adverse environmental effects to be made by DFO. | |
Accidental spills (e.g., fuel and lubricants) | Potential mortality from oiling. Long-term effects, such as impairment to reproduction. |
Use less toxic alternatives to hazardous products.
Follow manufacturers instructions for application. Proper storage of materials. Develop emergency spill response plan. Spill kits to be maintained be on-site in case of accidents. Designate areas for storage and refueling with proper containment. Train facility workers in the safe and effective use of fuel and lubricants. All machinery be in good working conditions, free of leaks. |
Monitoring further to responding to emergency spill response. |
D. Traditional Use of Lands and Resources by Aboriginal Persons |
||||
Project Activity | Potential Environmental Effects | Possible Mitigation | Significance of Adverse Environmental Effects | Follow-up Monitoring |
Access to site & harvesting activities | Interference with use of infrastructure (wharf, roads, etc.). | Consult with local aboriginal groups. Avoid areas of current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes. Meet all siting guidelines. |
Determination of significance of adverse environmental effects to be made by DFO. | |
Construction and Operation | Interference with traditional uses. | Consult with local aboriginal groups Avoid areas of current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes. Meet all siting guidelines. |
E. Fisheries Activities (e.g., commercial, recreational and aboriginal) |
||||
Project Activity | Potential Environmental Effects | Possible Mitigation | Significance of Adverse Environmental Effects | Follow-up Monitoring |
Operation of aquaculture site / vessel traffic | Interruption of access to fishing areas. | Abide by NWPA approvals and
conditions, including site-marking requirements. Consult with local fishermen and other marine user groups. Avoid sites with significant fisheries. Maintain access to site by fishers, as operational and safety conditions permit. Meet all siting guidelines. |
Determination of significance of adverse environmental effects to be made by DFO. |
F. Historical, Archaeological, Paleontological and Architectural |
||||
Project Activity | Potential Environmental Effects | Possible Mitigation | Significance of Adverse Environmental Effects | Follow-up Monitoring |
Site operations and activities | Information gap identified. | Consult with interested and
knowledgeable parties. Avoid areas of significant physical and cultural heritage. Background check into history of area. |
Determination of significance of adverse environmental effects to be made by DFO. |
Newfoundland Region Habitat Management Fisheries and Oceans Canada Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre P.O. Box 5667 St. John's, NF A1C 5X1 Phone: (709) 772-2442 Fax: (709) 772-5562 |
Maritimes Region Habitat Management Fisheries and Oceans Canada Bedford Institute of Oceanography P.O. Box 1006 Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2Y 4A2 Phone: (902) 426-8105 Fax: (902) 426-1489 |
Gulf Region Habitat Management P.O. Box, 5030 Fisheries and Oceans Canada Gulf Fisheries Centre 343 University Avenue Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 9B6 Phone: (506) 851-7768 Fax: (506) 851-6579 |
Quebec Region Gestion de l'habitat du poisson Pêches et Océans Canada Maurice Lamontagne Institute 850 de la Mer Road P.O. Box 1000 Mont-Joli (Québec) G5H 3Z4 Phone: (418) 775-0584 Fax: (418) 775-0658 |
Central and Arctic Region Habitat Management Fisheries and Oceans Canada 501 University Crescent Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N6 Phone: (204) 983-5164 Fax: (204) 984-2402 |
Pacific Region Habitat and Enhancement Branch Fisheries and Oceans Canada 555 West Hastings Street Vancouver, B.C. V6B 5G3 Phone: (604) 666-6532 Fax: (604) 666-4844 |
Algal bloom. An algal bloom refers to an increased concentration of toxic or harmful marine microorganisms that may colour the water and from which toxins may be released.
Anti-fouling. It is common for nets, cages, longlines and other gear to become clogged or obstructed with natural foreign matter such as algal and invertebrate species. Unchecked, such fouling may impair productivity in aquaculture operations. It is common, therefore, to deploy anti-fouling techniques to reduce the attraction of fouling organisms and / or to remove them from the affected gear.
Benthos. The aggregate of animals and plants living on or at the bottom of a body of water. Within this context, benthos also includes the characteristics of the physical and chemical environment on the sea or lake bed.
Biofoulants. Biological organisms such as algal and invertebrate species that adhere to gear causing fouling.
Biomass. The weight of all the organisms forming a given population or trophic level, or inhabiting a specific region. Within this context, biomass refers to the total weight of the aquaculture organisms.
Bottom Culture. Type of shellfish (bivalve) culture in which the shellfish grow on or within the subtrate and are exposed to air for a portion of the tidal cycle. Also referred to as intertidal or beach culture.
Class screening. A planning process that facilitates the environmental assessment of projects that have common or similar characteristics (e.g., project type, geographic location, proponent, environmental effects) and are subject to screening under CEAA. Class Screening Reports are reviewed and approved by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency through a process provided for in CEAA.
Comprehensive study. One of four types of environmental assessment provided for in CEAA. Projects subject to comprehensive study are defined by regulation (Comprehensive Study List Regulations) and have the potential for significant adverse environmental effects. A comprehensive study requires a review of the same factors as a review panel or mediation, which are a broader range than that required by a screening. Comprehensive studies also require public consultation on the completed environmental assessment report and a decision by the Minister of the Environment on the need for further review of the project by a mediator or review panel.
Contaminants. Substances that, when added to the water column, may render the water harmful or unusable by others.
Cumulative environmental effects. The incremental effects of a project or activity on the environment when the effects are combined with those from other past, existing and future projects or activities.
Decommissioning. The process of retiring a site and operation from active service.
Depositional. Characteristic of lower energy sites in which current velocity and turbulence are insufficient to carry away finer organic and/or inorganic particles which, therefore, accumulate on the ocean floor.
Environmentally-sensitive areas. Areas that command an added degree of precaution owing to features and characteristics that support protected species and/or unique habitats (e.g., rearing or spawning habitat, migration corridors, protected areas or proposed protected areas, location of salmon streams, sensitive migratory bird habitat, etc.).
Environmental monitoring plan. A concerted plan between proponents and regulators that outlines specific monitoring requirements (e.g., procedures, protocols, time frames, etc.) and reporting requirements.
Erosional. Characteristic of higher energy sites in which current velocity and turbulence are sufficient to disperse finer organic and/or inorganic particles and consequently, such sites often contain only coarse sediment (e.g., rocks, boulders, etc.).
Federal authority. For the purposes of CEAA, a federal authority is defined as :
Fetch. The distance over which wind-driven waves travel without encountering obstructions such as islands, mainland, etc. Fetch is an important characteristic of open water because longer fetch can result in larger wind-driven waves. The larger waves, in turn, can increase shoreline erosion and sediment resuspension.
Fish Health Management Plan. A comprehensive plan for maintaining optimum health of the aquatic stocks in culture, usually consisting of procedures and guidelines for procuring healthy stocks, fish handling and transport, vaccination, feeding and veterinary practice.
Hypernutrification. The addition of nutrients to a level that exceeds a normal or healthy state.
Important bird areas. Represent a network of sites that conserve the natural diversity of Canadian bird species, are critical for the long-term viability of naturally-occurring bird populations in Canada . The Important Bird Areas Program is part of the Natural Legacy 2000 program (sponsored by the Canadian Nature Federation, Ducks Unlimited, Nature Conservancy of Canada and the World Wildlife Fund), a nationwide initiative to conserve wildlife and habitats on private and public lands.
Inclusion List Regulations. A list set out in regulations to CEAA, which specify those activities for which an environmental assessment is required if a federal authority proposes, funds or otherwise authorizes a project by issuing a permit or license.
Intertidal. The region lying along the shore located between the low-water mark and the high-water mark.
Lantern (net). Net basket which hangs on suspension culture of scallops.
Law List Regulations. A list set out in regulations to CEAA, which describe all those federal statutory and regulatory approvals which will trigger an environmental assessment. This includes federal permits, approvals, certificates, licences and authorisations.
Longline. Form of suspended (off-bottom) culture in which shellfish are grown on suspended ropes or containers (baskets, stacked trays, lantern nets).
Marine Protected Area. Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) under the Oceans Act may be designated for the conservation and protection of: commercial and non-commercial fishery resources and their habitats; endangered or threatened marine species and their habitats; unique habitats; marine areas of high biodiversity or biological productivity; and any other marine resource or habitat for which the Minister is responsible.
Mediation. An environmental assessment that is conducted with the assistance of a mediator appointed pursuant to section 30 of CEAA and that includes consideration of the factors required to be considered under subsections 16(1) and (2) of CEAA.
Migratory Bird Sanctuary. Migratory bird sanctuaries (MBSs) are established under the Migratory Bird Convention Act (1917) and managed under the Migratory Bird Sanctuary Regulations. The regulations prohibit all disturbances, hunting and collection of migratory birds and their eggs within a migratory bird sanctuary. Migratory bird sanctuaries offer protection to 94 significant sites found in all provinces except Manitoba. About one-third of MBSs are located on federal lands, however, they may be located on private or provincial land or any combination of land ownership.
Mitigation measures. Measures taken in respect of a project for the elimination, reduction or control of the adverse environmental effects of the project, including restitution for any damage to the environment caused by such effects through replacement, restoration, compensation or any other means.
National Wildlife Area (NWA). Environment Canada, through the Canadian Wildlife Service, has authority to establish national wildlife areas, under the Canada Wildlife Act and Wildlife Area Regulations, for the purpose of wildlife conservation, research and interpretation. National wildlife areas can be established on Canada's federally-managed lands, internal waters and territorial sea. They can include any habitat type - terrestrial, wetland, aquatic, intertidal and marine. They may also be wholly established offshore within the territorial sea or inland waters. In a number of cases, national wildlife areas have been linked with migratory bird sanctuaries for the conservation of migratory birds and their habitats. In addition, with the cooperation of provincial jurisdictions, NWAs have been established for the benefit of some trans-boundary species, as well as, other rare, threatened and endangered species.
Near Bottom. Type of shellfish culture, in which the shellfish grow on an apparatus (such as a table, frame or trestle) which sits on the substrate. The shellfish do not grow directly on or within the substrate.
North American Datum (NAD). A plane (or more precisely, a surface) to which horizontal positions in the United States, Canada, Mexico and Central America are accurately surveyed and referenced.
Nutrient. Organic and inorganic elements and compounds that constitute food within the aquatic ecosystem, particularly those that stimulate primary productivity (i.e., the production of organic matter via photosynthesis, utilizing energy from sunlight, carbon dioxide and nutrients).
Off-bottom Culture. Form of shellfish culture, in which the shellfish are not grown on or within the substrate. See suspension culture and longline.
Organic matter. Products or by-products of the feeding of fish and/or shellfish and the subsequent process of metabolism (e.g., dissolved and particulate metabolic by-products such as ammonia, carbon dioxide, fish faeces, un-consumed feed, etc.). Organic matter may also originate from other sources, such as sewage, farms, etc.
Orthophoto map. A map that combines the high visual information content of a photograph with the geometric accuracy of a map.
Oxygen profile. A chart or graph indicating the concentration of dissolved oxygen at regular intervals through the water column from the surface to the ocean floor.
Plan view. An engineered drawing that shows the top view of a structure; i.e., looking down on the structure from directly above.
Ramsar site. The Convention on Wetlands, signed in Ramsar, Iran, in 1971, is an intergovernmental treaty which provides the framework for national action and international cooperation for the conservation and wise use of wetlands and their resources. Ramsar has developed numerous cooperative mechanisms with all the major environmental conventions and many international conservation organizations. Joint work plans with several Conventions such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) are being implemented. There are presently 124 Contracting Parties to the Convention, with 1073 wetland sites, totalling 81.76 million hectares, designated for inclusion in the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance.
Redox potential. Redox potential is a measure of oxidation and reduction reactions in water, measured as the loss or gain of electrons. Elements that donate electrons are oxidants while those that accept electrons are reductants (or de-oxidizers). In neutral, fully oxygenated water in equilibrium with air, redox potentials slightly greater than 500 mv are obtained. Redox measurements in natural waters should not be quantitatively interpreted or compared. Qualitative or relative comparisons, however, can be helpful in defining the degree of change within a system. Within an oxygenated water column, oxidative reactions predominate. As oxygen concentrations approach zero and anoxic conditions appear, as happens near the sediment-water interface, the redox potential drops significantly. Within the sediments, it is common for reducing conditions to prevail and the redox potential approaches zero or even a negative value.
Responsible Authority (RA). The federal authority whose actions or authority require that an environmental assessment of a particular project is conducted before the action or authority is exercised.
Review panel. Under section 33 of CEAA, the Minister of the Environment is empowered to appoint a review panel comprised of objective and knowledgeable persons to conduct the environmental assessment for a specific project, pursuant to the terms and conditions for review panels as presented in CEAA. The review panel makes it recommendations to the Minister of the Environment and the responsible authority.
Secchi Disc Depth. The depth (measured during the day under calm water conditions) at which a 30 cm diameter white disc disappears can be used as a semi-quantitative index of suspended matter in the water column. It is used to calculate the light extinction co-efficient which decreases as turbidity increases due to higher concentrations of suspended particulate matter.
Species at risk. Any indigenous species, subspecies, variety, or geographically defined population of wild fauna and flora of special concern because of characteristics that make it particularly sensitive to human activities or natural events and at potential risk of becoming threatened or endangered.
Screening. A type of environmental assessment under CEAA requiring consideration of the factors outlined in subsection 16(1) of CEAA (see Part I).
Steady-state capacity. The normal month-in-month-out production capacity of a venture reflecting a relatively stable level of biomass, in contrast to the inaugural start-up period that is characterized by a rapid escalation in biomass.
Sub-tidal. A region located below the low water mark in a tidal area.
Suspension Culture. Method of culturing shellfish by growing them on ropes or other structures, suspended from a fixed or floating apparatus.
Thermally stratified. During summer months, it is common for deep bodies of water to become thermally stratified into three distinct layers. The upper layer (epilimnion) is characterized by more or less uniform, warm, circulating and fairly turbulent water. The lower layer (hypolimnion) is deep, cold and relatively undisturbed water. Between these two layers, the metalimnion is a narrow layer having a steep thermal gradient marking the transition from the warmer, upper stratum to the lower, colder stratum.
Tidal slack period. The period of transition between low and high tide and, conversely, between high and low tide during which there is very little current.
Trigger. An action by a federal authority that initiates the need for an environmental assessment under CEAA; that is one or more of the following duties, powers, or functions in relation to a project:
Turbidity. The transparency of water to light as influenced by unclear or murky conditions related to the presence of stirred-up sediment and/or the presence of algal and planktonic populations.
Valued ecosystem component. Any part of the environment that is considered important by the proponent, public, scientists or government involved in the environmental assessment process. Importance may be determined on the basis of cultural values or scientific concern.
Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network Site. The Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network (WHSRN) is a voluntary, non-regulatory coalition of over 160 private and public organizations in seven countries working together to study and conserve shorebirds throughout their habitats. The mission of the WHSRN is the conservation, restoration, and management of critical shorebird habitats throughout the Americas. Membership in WHSRN provides a site with international recognition as a major host for shorebirds.
Yearly highest tide. The highest spring tide level recorded for an annual cycle.
Yearly lowest tide. The lowest spring tide level recorded for an annual cycle.
Last Updated : 2006-06-28 |