BIOCLIMATIC MAPPING OF ONTARIO REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS
INTRODUCTION
Conservation planning for any species requires that the distribution
of the species in question be known. This observation may appear trite,
but decisions that affect taxa are often made in ignorance of their true
distribution. Accumulating accurate data on species distributions
is costly and labour intensive. Thus, landscape models that employ habitat
features of an organisms environment to predict its potential distribution
will offer an invaluable tool for larger scale conservation planning.
A previous collaborative study at the Great Lakes Forestry Centre led
to the development of climate-based models of potential distributions
of amphibians and reptiles in Ontario. Amphibians and reptiles constitute
a sizeable and diverse component of many ecosystems. Moreover, representatives
of this group may be sensitive bio-indicators of ecosystem health given
concerns over amphibian declines around the world. Distributions of species
within this group are only broadly known, with information at the mesogeographic
scale often poor to non-existent.
![Biomap for 43 herpetofaunal species in Ontario](/web/20061102232516im_/http://www.glfc.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/frontline/images/images_e/figure_1.gif) |
Figure 1. Biomap range results
overlaid for 43 herpetofaunal species in Ontario. Areas that appear
to be gaps are strong candidates for field-based inventory programs.
|
While many habitat factors affect the distribution of amphibians and
reptiles, given the fact all of these organisms are ectothermic (cold
blooded), it is a reasonable expectation that their potential distributions
might be determined by examining climatic profiles associated with actual
sightings. In this research, the potential distributions of 43 reptile
and amphibian species and subspecies resident to the Province of Ontario,
Canada, were modelled using ANUCLIM, a suite of computer-based modelling
tools. ANUCLIM makes use of mathematical climate surfaces, a Digital Elevation
Model (DEM) and species' location information to produce and subsequently
map bioclimatic profiles.
DATA SOURCES AND MODELS
Historical species distribution information was obtained from the
Ontario Herpetofaunal Summary (OHS), a compilation of more than 100,000
observations of 58 species and subspecies of reptiles (30) and amphibians
(28) in Ontario. A new Ontario DEM (a regular grid of latitude, longitude,
and elevation providing a computer-based model of the topography of the
landscape) was used to append elevations to site data. ANUCLIM used climatic
surfaces for Ontario developed from a network of 471 weather stations
across Ontario, Quebec, and Manitoba these surfaces have now been
extended across the country. A location profile for each species was created
and fed into BIOCLIM, which estimated a suite of climatic parameters at
each species location. The values were used by the program to derive each
species bioclimatic profile. These profiles were used in the BIOMAP
program (a module of ANUCLIM) to produce maps of a spatial hypothesis
of potential species richness across the province.
RESULTS
Box plot bioclimatic profiles for four taxonomic groups (toads and
frogs, salamanders, snakes, and lizards) were created, which provide a
visual means of comparing the climatic domains across species (results
were created for eight climate variables). BIOMAP results can be viewed
for each species investigated at http://www.glfc.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/landscape/herp_e.html.
Figure 1 presents the overlay of BIOMAP results for all 43 species and
subspecies.
![Wood Turtle (Clemmys inscupta) found in its predicted Northern range in Ontario](/web/20061102232516im_/http://www.glfc.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/frontline/images/turtle.jpg) |
Figure 2. A wood turtle (Clemmys
insculpta) found in its predicted Northern range in Ontario.
|
CONCLUSIONS
These climatic domains represent a spatial hypothesis or prediction of
places climatically suitable for each reptile and amphibian species. Whether
the species is actually present will depend on the presence of additional
habitat features, in particular, appropriate vegetation cover and water
bodies.
The problem of over sampling in some areas was addressed through the
development of algorithms to specify a minimum distance between locations.
This process affects the amount and spatial distribution of the core climatic
domain, but not the overall range limits. The concept of defining a core
climatic domain is potentially very important from a conservation-biology
perspective. Core habitats and core climatic domains need to be defined
using data obtained by sampling a species entire range. Hence, the
estimates of core ranges produced in this study are probably of limited
use at present.
MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
Combining the BIOMAP results with additional geographic data such
as wetlands, streams, rivers, and forest cover from satellite imagery
can provide a much higher resolution prediction of potential habitat.
Results can be used to help define monitoring programs for particular
reptile and/or amphibian species and locations for restoration and conservation
programs (Figure 2). Quantification of the climatic limits of taxa provides
a context for investigating the effects of other environmental disturbance
variables, and provides a basis for examining how species may respond
to anticipated global warming.
SOURCES OF RELEVANT INFORMATION
McKenney, D.; MacKay, B.; Bogart, J.; McKee, J.; Oldman, M.; Chek.,
A. 1998. Bioclimatic and spatial analysis of Ontario reptiles and amphibians.
Ecosciences 5(1): 18-30.
McKenney, D.; Mackay, B.; Hutchinson, M.; Sims, R. 1996. An accuracy
assessment of a spatial bioclimatic model. Pages 291-300 in H.T. Mowere,
R.L. Czaplewski & R.H. Hamre, eds. Spatial Accuracy Assessment in
Natural Resource and Environmental Sciences: Second International Symposium.
Fort Collins, Colorado.
McKenney, D.; Mackay, B.; Sims, R.; Wang, Y.; Campbell, K.; Welsch, D.;
Oldham, M. 1996. Quantifying species distributions for biodiversity assessments:
Some examples applied to trees, herpetofauna, and birds in Ontario. Natural
Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.
NODA Note No.22.
CONTACT
Dan McKenney
Chief, Landscape Analysis and Applications Section
Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre
1219 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 2E5
Tel: (705) 541-5569
dmckenne@NRCan.gc.ca
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2003
ISSN 1496-7847
For more information on Frontline Express Contact:
Canadian Forest Service - Great Lakes Forestry Centre
1219 Queen Street East,
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2E5
(705) 759-5740
http://www.glfc.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca
|