![]() | ![]() |
|
Proactive disclosure Print version ![]() ![]() | ![]() | ![]() Geochemical Modeling Mapping Soil Mineralogy - by EDS methods
Mineralogical analyses establish the properties, provenance, and weathering history of soils and sediments, and are basic to geology, agriculture, the environment, forestry, and natural resources. For fine-grained materials, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses of clay-sized (<0.002 mm) and silt and clay-sized (<0.063 mm) fractions, and petrographic and microbeam analyses of coarser (0.425-2 mm) fractions are commonly used. However, particulate mineralogy can be difficult to characterize due to (1) fine grain sizes (e.g., <0.063 mm), (2) organic matter, (3) secondary, amorphous salts and Fe and Mn oxides, and (4) weathering of minerals. XRD methods are effectively limited to minerals comprising >5 wt% of the sample (Minnis, 1984), and can be difficult to apply for grains larger than silt-sized (>0.063 mm) unless the sample is crushed. Petrographic and microbeam approaches focus on individual grains, incorporating varied geochemical and morphological parameters for mineral determinations. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using backscattered electron (BSE) and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDS) spectrometry images have often been used to map elements and to determine grain separations, boundaries, and shapes (Hall and Lloyd,1981; White et al., 1984; Pye, 1984; Pye and Krinsley, 1984; Dilks and Graham, 1985; Mainwaring, 1989; Tovey et al., 1989; Petruk 1989a, 1989b; Nadeau and Hurst, 1991; Tovey and Krinsley, 1991, 1992; Protz et al.,1992; Tovey and Hounslow, 1995; Krinsley et al., 1998). At the Geological Survey of Canada a methodology for combining EDS element image maps has been developed to determine quantative soil mineralogy of particulate matter (Knight et al., 2002).
EDS image analyses comprises four steps:
The original and processed image files are stored in a nested series of folders which reflect the processing sequence and expedite file loading, image enhancement, and mineralogical interpretation. The original EDS image files are used to resolve complex mineral interpretations. References
Dilks, A. and Graham, S.C. 1985
Hall, M.G., and Lloyd, G. E., 1981
Knight, R.D., Klassen, R.A., and Hunt, P. 2002
Krinsley, D.H., Pye, K., Boggs, S.Jr and Tovey, N.K., 1998
Mainwaring, P.R. 1989
Minnis, M.M., 1984
Nadeau, P.H. and Hurst, A. 1991
Petruk, W. 1989a
Petruk, W. 1989b
Protz, R., Sweeney, S.J., and Fox, C.A. 1992
Pye, K. 1984
Pye, K. and Krinsley, D.H. 1984
Tovey, N.K. and Hounslow, M.W. 1995
Tovey, N.K. and Krinsley, D.H. 1991
Tovey, N.K., Smart, P., Hounslow, M.W., and Leng, X.L. 1989
White, S.H., Shaw, H.F., and Huggett, J.M. 1984
|