| |
Consultations
on a Canadian Resource Recovery Strategy
Summary of Yellowknife/Northwest Territories & Yukon Consultation
Held at Yellowknife, NT on April 22, 2002
1. Background
Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) is holding a series of consultation
sessions over the spring of 2002 on the development of a Canadian
Resource Recovery Strategy (CRRS). Sessions are being held in seven
locations including Vancouver, Yellowknife, Edmonton, Toronto, Halifax,
Montreal and Iqaluit. Representatives from industry, non-governmental
organisations and all levels of government are being invited to participate.
The objectives of these sessions are to identify:
-
Resource recovery priorities in urban, rural, and north of 60 communities
across Canada;
-
Barriers to resource recovery in every region;
-
Potential
resource recovery demonstration projects in industrial, post-consumer
and institutional sectors;
-
Estimated levels of project funding and co-funding partners.
In Yellowknife,
the day-long consultation session began with an introduction by each
participant, followed by an overview from Mike Clapham, NRCan, of
the Canadian Resource Recovery Strategy (see Background Paper, Attachment
I). The group then discussed resource recovery issues, priorities,
roles of different stakeholders in the development and demonstration
of projects, barriers to resource recovery, following which they identified
potential resource recovery projects for co-funding by NRCan.
A copy of the
agenda and the list of participants in Yellowknife are attached (Attachments
II and III). There were sixteen participants representing resource
recyclers, the City of Yellowknife, Diavik Diamonds, the government
of the Northwest Territories, local entrepreneurs, a landfill operator,
a gold mine undergoing environmental rehabilitation (Miramar Giant
Mines), and concerned citizens including one Inuit Elder. Participants
included two representatives from Yukon and two from Inuvik.
Items of Note
North of 60° and Yellowknife
-
The landfill in the City of Yellowknife has no restrictions on non-hazardous
materials. Residents are not charged for access to the landfill
(no tipping fee). As a result, there is little incentive to recycle
or reduce readily recyclable materials, e.g. cardboard.
-
The City landfill provides a section for salvageable materials where
goods such as clothing, TV's, etc. can be retrieved at no charge.
-
The City landfill does not meet the environmental management standards
for Diavik Diamonds, necessitating the shipment of wastes by Diavik
further south for sound environmental management.
-
Most supplies are shipped from the south. Very few goods are shipped
south other than gold and diamonds and some waste. Most of the waste
remains in the north and is not recovered or reused. Many trucks
return south empty, so that backhaul costs are covered in the one-way
shipping prices.
-
Land access to distant mines is available only in the winter via
ice roads, which are available for a period of approximately 10
weeks. The remote mines target to have most of their supplies shipped
over the winter roads to avoid costly delivery by air, the only
other available mode of transportation.
-
Yellowknife has more artists per capita than any other Canadian
community.
-
Yellowknife has a relatively high population of short-term residents
that tend to have little interest in recycling.
-
Many community services are provided by volunteers. Volunteer efforts
are difficult to sustain due to lack of resources, which results
in burnout and lack of continuity in initiated programs.
-
Several resource recovery projects were identified that would deliver
both resource recovery and local community benefits.
-
Some of the resource recovery projects identified involve innovative
partnerships between industry and local government that would potentially
reduce costs, greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts.
3. Resource
Recovery Issues
Participants
identified the resource recovery issues listed in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1:
Resource Recovery Issues in the Northwest Territories (NT) and Yukon
Issue
|
Industrial
|
Institutional/
Commercial
|
Post-consumer
|
Metal tanks
from Giant Mine |
Y
|
|
|
Scrap metal
from Giant Mine |
Y
|
|
|
Waste packaging
- Industrial/ Commercial/Institutional (ICI) (cardboard) |
Y
|
Y
|
|
Metal from
out of service large metal tanks in remote communities |
|
Y
|
|
Waste oil
from vehicles |
|
|
Y
|
Food scraps,
other organics |
Y
|
|
Y
|
Paper (80%
of material in Yellowknife and Inuvik landfills is paper) |
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Hazardous
materials |
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Propane tanks
that require valve replacement every 10 years |
|
|
Y
|
Wooden pallets |
Y
|
Y
|
|
Wood waste
(poles) |
Y
|
|
|
Tires |
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Municipal
organic matter |
Y
|
|
Y
|
Yard wastes |
|
|
Y
|
Nonspec industrial
waste oil |
Y
|
|
|
Domestic
glass |
|
|
Y
|
Domestic
plastic |
|
|
Y
|
Beverage
containers |
|
|
Y
|
Building
materials |
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Electronic
scrap |
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Other hazardous
waste |
|
|
Y
|
Batteries |
|
|
Y
|
Fluorescent
light bulbs |
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Waste heat |
|
Y
|
|
Sewage |
|
Y
|
|
Used goods
- e.g. microwaves, TV's, furniture |
|
|
Y
|
Solvents |
|
|
Y
|
Paints in
NT (paints are separated in the Yukon) |
|
Y
|
Y
|
Arsenic trioxide
(250,000 tonnes) buried in closed gold mines |
Y
|
|
|
Automobile
waste products |
|
|
Y
|
4. Priorities
The session participants
identified the following priorities:
Summary of
Priorities
Summary of Key Barriers
- Transportation
costs
- Lack of volumes
- Collection,
storage infrastructure
- Life cycle and
social and environmental costs not included in the costs of products
6. Roles
The following roles
for governments and industry to play in enhancing resource recovery
were identified:
Role
|
Federal
|
Provincial
|
Territorial
|
Municipal
|
Industry
|
Increase awareness |
|
|
|
Y
|
|
Lead by example |
Y
|
|
|
|
|
National inventory
of available used resources (e.g. database accessible through 1-800
or E-bay) |
Y
|
|
|
|
|
Funding for
resource recovery |
Y
|
|
|
|
|
Incentives
for recycled product content |
Y
|
|
|
|
|
Facilitate
use of recycled content by coordinating permission/approvals from
CMHC/other agencies |
Y
|
|
|
|
|
Provide tax
breaks for renovation (property, income) |
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
|
Design for
recovery recycling, e.g. housing/computers |
Y
|
|
|
|
|
Implement true
cost accounting of landfill |
|
|
|
Y
|
|
Limit quantities
of waste (charge after limit exceeded) |
|
|
|
Y
|
|
Make it convenient
to recycle |
|
|
|
Y
|
|
Offer financial
incentives for recycling |
|
|
|
|
|
Ticket litterers
|
|
|
|
Y
|
|
Recover methane
from landfill |
|
|
|
Y
|
|
Practice product
stewardship |
|
|
|
|
Y
|
Be open to
innovative ideas for resource |
|
|
|
|
Y
|
Print reports,
manual on demand only |
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Charge extra
for manuals of products |
|
|
|
|
Y
|
Accept responsibility
for packaging/provide baler at store |
|
|
|
|
Y
|
Arrange for
cardboard to be backhauled |
|
|
|
|
Y
|
Ban commercial
cardboard from landfill |
|
|
|
Y
|
|
Implement deposit/takeback
- put responsibility back to producer |
|
|
|
Y
|
Y
|
Provide incentives
for backhaul |
|
|
Y
|
|
|
Coordinate/Harmonize
resource recovery through Canadian Council of the Ministers of the
Environment (CCME) |
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
|
|
7. Opportunities
Group discussion
revealed the following opportunities for improving resource recovery
in the region:
- Consider mechanisms
to recover money from the items salvaged from the Yellowknife landfill
- perhaps by charging a small fee for access to the 'salvage' section.
Inuvik requires a salvage permit for access to their salvage area.
This money could then be used to encourage recycling.
- Impose a landfill
ban on disposal of specific recyclable materials, e.g. cardboard,
and arrange for a viable alternative.
- Develop a diversion
strategy for demolition materials.
- Provide recycling
bins 'everywhere.'
- Impose a charge
for garbage over a certain weight.
- Impose a fine
for disposal of recyclables - distribute the fine among all the tenants
in a multi-resident building.
- The Federation
of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) represents over 1000 communities.
FCM has a total of $250 million available from a Green Municipal Fund
for innovative environmental approaches. FCM is seeking ways to decouple
growth in waste quantities from economic growth and is interested
in projects that result in greenhouse gas emissions reduction.
- The local prison
is being relocated. Alternate uses for the building and the water
storage tank under the building should be pursued.
- Explore extension
of existing product stewardship programs in Alberta to NT, e.g. beverage
containers, tires and/or develop NT programs based on Alberta experience.
Alberta has successful programs based on government establishing a
requirement for product takeback by industry and imposing a takeback
fee in the product price. The fee is then collected and utilized by
industry to establish and pay for cost-effective recycling programs.
- Identify and
implement incentives for recycling, e.g. buying a solar panel should
be tax deductible, there should be an incentive, possibly a tax incentive,
for buying waste oil.
- Transport recyclable
materials to recycling facilities in the south on supply trucks that
would otherwise be deadheading back (making a return trip without
a load).
- Partnerships
between industry, government and local communities
- Study/develop
models for effective mobilization of not-for-profit organizations
that could provide continuity.
- Partnerships
between retailers, especially 'big box' retailers, and local communities
- Establish a
resource recovery fund.
- Involve local/regional
offices of federal departments with central federal offices and local
governments in the development and delivery of local resource recovery
programs.
8. Projects
Participants identified
a variety of possible resource recovery projects in the region. These
are presented in Table 8-1 below under the headings of post-consumer,
institutional and industrial projects; projects that could potentially
address more than one category are grouped together as "cross-cutting"
projects. Some projects were more fully developed. All project ideas
have been reported below. Where details were available, they have been
included.
Project submissions
received after the April 22 consultation are listed in Table 8-2.
Table 8-1: Potential Resource Recovery Projects
Project
|
Sponsor
|
Impact
|
Cost
|
Potential
Partners
|
CROSS-CUTTING
|
Build an Arts
Centre for Northwest Territories (NT) using reclaimed large holding
tanks. These tanks are no longer required because long-term storage
of fuel in tanks is no longer necessary. (Project proposed in letter
to city councillors submitted).
|
Francois Thibeau,
supported by Aurora Arts Society |
o Diversion
of large quantities of steel from landfill
o Filling a local need for an Arts Centre
o Saves environmental impacts of extraction
o Processing of natural resources |
? |
City of Yellowknife,
Government of Northwest Territories (GNWT). Cleanup costs of the
tanks are the responsibility of the Department of Indian and Northern
Development (DIAND). |
Save former
Hudson's Bay warehouse building from demolition, turn it into a
community activity centre that incorporates a glass foundry, a music
school, an Arts Centre, etc. Heat from foundry could be used to
heat building.
|
Matthew Grogono,
supported by other local citizens and artists |
o Avoidance
of demolition wastes
o Reuse of equipment in building
o Serving a community need |
$1.5 to 2 million
|
|
Energy offset
between community and minesite - Diavik could pay for wind energy
project in Yellowknife to offset greenhouse gas emissions from electricity
production at minesite, greenhouse gas credits could be obtained.
|
Diavik Mines
|
o Greenhouse
gas emission reductions from NWT |
? |
|
Remote mines
in NT could pay to upgrade landfill in Yellowknife and save costs
of transport of wastes further south for environmental disposal.
|
Diavik Mines |
o Improved
landfill in Yellowknife
o Reduced GHG emissions by avoided transport south
o Cost savings to mines |
? |
|
Feasibility
study of wind profiles could be applied to communities.
|
mines |
|
? |
|
Save 2 mine
headframes, turn into geological museum for NT |
|
o Extends landfill
life
o Provides local employment
o Attracts tourists |
? |
DIAND, the
City of Yellowknife, and the NT Department of Resources, Wildlife
and Economic Development (RWED). |
Recover
cardboard,
paper,
and packaging; convert into pellets for use as fuel |
|
|
? |
Suppliers,
City of Yellowknife |
POST-CONSUMER
|
Youths from
local Christian Fellowship Society could collect beverage cans from
local office buildings and sell them to a local beverage collection
centre and/or Alberta. Money could pay for a Christian Centre. |
Diavik / Francois
Thibeau |
o Provide activities
for local youths |
? |
|
INSTITUTIONAL |
Challenged
people could refurbish pallets and avoid/reduce need for Yellowknife
to buy new pallets (e.g. similar project in Hawkesbury). Pallets
could also be used as fuels. |
|
o Extends landfill
life |
|
|
Recover waste
heat from diesel GS at Jackfish Lake to run a greenhouse, or for
aquaculture, or to heat a compost facility. |
|
o Attracts
new industry
o Reduces greenhouse gas emissions |
|
|
Study sustainability
of not-for-profits |
|
|
|
|
Study tax deductions
for volunteer organization to address sustainability |
|
|
|
|
Reuse old buildings,
establish a greenhouse that would provide local produce
|
|
o Extends landfill
life
o Reduces greenhouse gas emissions from transport of produce |
|
|
Restore 50
year old arena to multiuse - skating in winter, and community centre
in summer
|
|
o Extends landfill
life
o Enhance community quality of life |
$1.5 million
(approx.) |
|
Reuse equipment
from old Canadian Tire Building - into Arts Centre Building, sprinklers,
heating system |
|
o Extends landfill
life |
|
Canadian Heritage
Foundation, Governments of NT and Yukon, DIAND,
private
foundations,
Federation
of
Canadian
Municipalities (FCM) |
Revitalize
Festival of Midnight Sun |
|
|
|
|
INDUSTRIAL |
Establish local
businesses to make communities more self-sufficient, reduce transportation
costs of products, e.g. bakeries |
|
o Provides
local employment |
|
|
Recover and
use heat from 80o F water that is 1000 feet deep |
|
|
|
DIAND, Arctic
Energy Alliance |
Recycle of
Scrap Metal located at Giant Mine. Unless a suitable alternative
is found, thousands of tons of scrap metal currently located at
the Giant Mine site will have to be hauled, at cost, to a landfill.
The proposal is to make use of back-haul opportunities offered by
trucks returning empty from Yellowknife to the south, and ship the
scrap south for recycling. It is proposed that money that would
otherwise have been used to collect and haul this scrap material
to the landfill be allocated for this project. (Details provided
above have been abstracted from a project sheet received after the
April 22 consultation.) |
Miramar Giant
Mine Ltd. |
o Divert material
from the City of Yellowknife landfill.
o Eliminate potential ground water and surface water contamination.
|
$400,000 (over
a
period
of two to four years) |
DIAND,
Government
of Northwest Territories (GNWT), City of Yellowknife, and local
trucking firms. |
POST-CONSUMER
|
Tire recovery/removal/reuse.
The objective of the study is to implement alternatives to land
filling used tires, including feasibility assessment of re-use strategies.
Options include: (a) the collection, sorting and shipping to south
and (b) create re-use projects.
|
AB Salvage
|
o Network with
local community for reuse
o Network with southern organizations that recycle tire products.
o Prevent land filling and potential fire hazards with toxic emissions
|
$33,000 (two
collections/year: $18,000; assess feasibility of re-use strategies:$15,000)
Funding in place at present: $13,000 |
Town of Inuvik
(Municipal Green Funds), Inuvik Recycling Society and a Tire producer
|
Used Batteries
Recovery/Removal. To collect, sort and ship south, used batteries
to prevent land filling and potential fire hazards with toxic emissions.
|
AB Salvage
|
o Network with
organizations that recycle battery products. |
$18,000 a year
(twice yearly collections and shipments)
Funding in place at present: $9,000 |
Town of Inuvik
and Inuvik Recycling Society. |
Recovery/Reuse
and Removal of used waste paints -- latex and non-latex (oil- based)
paints |
AB Salvage |
o Network with
local community for reuse of used paints
o Network with southern organizations that dispose of used non-
latex paint products |
$18,000 a year
(twice yearly collections and shipments)
Funding in place at present: $9,000 |
Town of Inuvik
and Inuvik Recycling Society. |
Used Vehicle
Recovery/Removal. To collect, sort and ship south, used vehicles
to prevent land filling and potential fire hazards with toxic emissions
|
AB Salvage
|
o Network with
organizations that utilize scrap metal products |
$57,000 a year
(one annual collection / compaction and shipment).
Funding in place at present: $26,000 |
Town of Inuvik
(Municipal Green Funds), Inuvik Recycling Society |
Cardboard/paper
recovery/burner conversion. To collect, sort, reuse and convert
cardboard products and paper products to prevent land filling and
produce heat energy. |
AB Salvage
|
o Reduce land
filling in rural/northern community |
$300,000 for
year one.
Funding in place at present: $150,000 |
Town of Inuvik,
NT Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development (RWED),
Environment Canada, Inuvik Recycling Society, and Local Businesses.
|
Project Coordinator
- Resource Recovery Strategist. The role of the Northern representative
for the NRCan initiative would be to initiate, organize, seek funding,
offer community education, investigate feasibility plans and oversee
all daily operations of resource recovery strategies, to deal with
preventing and diverting items from the community landfill that
would otherwise be potential fire hazards, leachable or give off
toxic emissions. Will oversee all projects related to cardboard,
batteries, tires, used vehicles, paints, paper, used oil, bottle
deposit system, and backhauling activities. |
AB Salvage
|
o Significant
impact on rural/northern communities.
o Network with local community for reuse
o Network with southern organizations that recycle/dispose of various
waste materials. |
$120,000 a
year.
Estimated funding in place at the moment: $60,000 |
Town of Inuvik,
Municipal Green Funds, Environment Canada (Eco-Action and the Canadian
Rural Partnerships Program), RWED and the Inuvik Recycling Society.
|
CONSULTATIONS ON A CANADIAN RESOURCE RECOVERY STRATEGY
- A Background Paper -
April 12, 2002
Attachment I
1. Introduction
Resource recovery
seeks to recover materials and energy at the end of product life in
an economic, social and environmentally sustainable manner. Natural
Resources Canada (NRCan) wishes to identify potential demonstration
resource recovery projects that are reflective of Canada's unique circumstances.
These projects will form the basis of a Canadian Resource Recovery Strategy.
NRCan is undertaking
a consultative process with all interested partners to solicit their
views and ideas in a series of discussion fora to identify resource
recovery priorities and recommend economic and environmentally sustainable
demonstration projects for co-funding. Your input to this process is
being sought.
NRCan is targeting
to identify projects, funding partners and levels that can be incorporated
in a resource recovery strategy that reflects the needs of all regions
across Canada. From these consultations a business case will be developed
and presented to federal senior management in the fall of 2002.
2. The Process
Consultations are
planned during April and May in the following locations:
- Vancouver, B.C.
covering B.C. and the Yukon
- Edmonton, Alberta
covering Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba
- Yellowknife,
N.W.T. covering the North West Territories
- Toronto, ON
covering Ontario
- Montreal, QC
covering Quebec
- Halifax, N.S.
covering Atlantic Canada
- Iqaluit, Nunavut
covering Nunavut
The objectives of
the consultations are to identify:
- resource recovery
priorities in urban and rural communities across Canada;
- resource recovery
priorities north of Canada's 60th parallel;
- barriers to
resource recovery in each region;
- potential resource
recovery demonstration projects in industrial, post-consumer and institutional
sectors;
- estimated levels
of project funding and co-funding partners.
Participants are requested to come to the meeting with one or more
of the following: ?
local resource recovery issues and opportunities;
- sectoral resource
recovery issues and opportunities, i.e. industrial, institutional,
post- consumer;
- barriers encountered
in addressing the above issues and opportunities;
- potential demonstration
projects that need co-funding to implement.
A draft format
for identifying potential demonstration projects is attached for your
consideration (see Appendix I). One form for each potential demonstration
project should be completed and taken to the consultation meeting.
The priorities,
barriers and demonstration projects identified over the course of the
consultations will be compiled in notes that will be transmitted to
all participants. NRCan will use the results of the consultations to
recommend demonstration projects for co-funding by the federal government.
3. CONTEXT
3.1 Background
Domestic and global
demand for recycling and recycled products has been steadily increasing,
and will continue. Both industrialized and non-industrialized economies
are being challenged to be efficient and competitive, and to ensure
the environmentally sound management of products and materials throughout
their life cycle.
The recycling of
products is becoming a highly competitive growth industry. Recycling
is recognized as being resource efficient and is one of the means of
achieving industrial and commercial stewardship together with associated
reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Domestic and international pressure
for the adoption of prevention-oriented measures that maximize the material
and energy efficiency of products in their design and manufacture is
growing. This pressure is creating opportunities for cost-effective
and environmentally sound recycling and reuse of products at the end
of their planned economic life.
Canada has been
blessed with geography and geology rich in naturally occurring resources.
Due to the multi-elemental complexity of many ore bodies, the challenges
presented in harvesting multiple species of forest resources and oil
exploration and extraction, Canada has unique and highly specialized
competencies in natural resource management and production expertise.
This specialized resource management knowledge base combined with existing
infrastructure of modern processes and production facilities, provide
a significant advantage in managing complex recyclable resource materials
arising from both post industrial and post consumer sectors.
Small and Medium-size
Enterprises (SME's) have their own special opportunities, needs and
challenges. For them, a typical challenge is to secure access to small-scale
technologies and processes for resource recovery that are affordable
and cost-effective, and that do not necessarily rely on direct or regular
access to more sophisticated centralized recovery facilities. SME's
remain the backbone of Canada's economy, responsible for a high proportion
of employment, growth.
In absolute terms
resource recovery operations are most attractive in urbanized regions,
but in relative terms can occasionally be of greater significance in
sensitive rural and remote areas.
The North would
be a particularly significant case in point, as would be valuable farming
and tourism areas and regions with delicate ecosystems and valued natural
amenities. In communities and regions where haulage of recyclable materials
to centralize recovery operations is too costly or impractical, local
small-scale recovery enterprises may present an attractive alternative
and opportunity.
Canada has an opportunity
to establish itself as a global leader in niche areas of resource recovery,
with a positive image as a responsible life-cycle manager of products.
There is a need to develop and promote Canadian technologies and approaches
that can compete in the growing global market for viable and environmentally
responsible resource recovery technologies and expertise. In order for
this to happen Canada has to remain an active and credible participant
in international policy developments affecting both global markets for
recyclable materials and the access to foreign markets of Canadian products.
3.2 The Canadian
Resource Recovery Strategy
NRCan is facilitating
the development of a Canadian resource recovery strategy. Canada needs
a strategy for the following reasons:
- to improve material
and resource efficiencies,
- reduce environmental
impacts of resource use,
- contribute to
Canada's plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,
- address the
unique challenges and opportunities to resource recovery posed by
Canada's geography, population distribution and climate,
- position Canada
to be a global leader in niche areas of resource recovery.
Resource recovery
consists of measures to maximize the economic opportunities and success
in - recovering products (and by-products), materials and energy at
the end of product life, and putting them back to work in the economy
through recycling and reuse.
A resource recovery strategy focuses on the promotion and support of
innovative product design and supportive public, private and consumer
policies and practices that a.) increase the recoverability of valuable
material and energy resources at the end of product life; b.) improve
access to recoverable products, materials and energy (including product
components and by- products) by those involved in the recycling and
reuse sectors; and c.) enhance the efficiency and environmental soundness
of recycling and reuse. Cost-effective and environmentally sound resource
recovery optimizes the productive use of natural resources, minimizes
waste generation and related treatment and disposal costs and supports
industrial innovation and competitiveness.
Effective resource
recovery efforts involve complex policy, technology, regulatory, and
infrastructure issues that transcend traditional industrial, commercial,
institutional and consumer sector and inter-jurisdictional boundaries.
Strong partnerships with provinces/territories, communities, industry,
consumers and public stakeholder groups are vital to successful approaches.
The establishment of a consultation process identifying projects that
will have an impact on the recovery of materials currently going to
waste is an essential start.
Three key elements
need to be addressed when developing a cost-effective, environmentally
sound resource recovery strategy than can advance Canada's sustainable
development goals:
1. How to inform,
influence and engage decision-makers in governments, industry, non-
governmental organizations and Canadians generally in taking appropriate
action in resource recovery activities. Shifting the paradigm, from
considering end-of-life products and materials as a waste to looking
at them as valuable resources to be recovered for further economic use,
will be crucial to increased recovery activities
2. How to advance technologies, processes and supporting institutional
networks and infrastructure so that they better support resource recovery.
The availability of cost- effective and environmentally sound technologies,
infrastructure, equipment and processes is vital to the growth and development
of domestic resource recovery operations. This includes both upstream
technologies and approaches for the design of products that are amenable
to cost-effective recovery at the end of their planned economic life,
and downstream technologies and approaches for the efficient and effective
diversion, extraction, separation, reuse and recycling of materials
and energy
3. How to create
and maintain a policy and regulatory environment that facilitates and
reinforces cost-effective and environmentally sound resource recovery.
At the heart of a viable resource recovery sector in Canada is a favourable
domestic climate for investment in, and operation of, resources recovery
operations. The complex array of regulatory and other policy measures
affecting the operation and financing of resource recovery operations
influence profoundly the overall financial and operational viability
of many reuse and recycling initiatives.
4. Project Criteria
Demonstration projects
are to be identified that:
- will develop
and promote Canadian technologies and approaches that can compete
in the growing global market for viable and environmentally responsible
resource recovery technologies and expertise;
- inform, influence
and engage decision-makers in governments, industry, non-governmental
organizations and Canadians generally in taking appropriate action
in resource recovery activities;
- advance technologies,
processes and supporting institutional networks and infrastructure
so that they better support resource recovery;
- create and maintain
a policy and regulatory environment that facilitates and reinforces
cost- effective and environmentally sound resource recovery.
The projects should:
- be capable of
being economically, environmentally and socially sustainable;
- have willing
partners from other levels of government, industry, community groups
and other interested stakeholders;
- recover products
and materials at the end-of-life for industrial, institutional and
post consumer levels of society;
- address local
priorities and have active local champions,
- be reasonably
well-defined
- need co-funding
to implement.
5. Conclusions
and Next Steps
Following the stakeholder
consultation sessions and any written comments submitted by May 31,
2002, a summary of the comments received will be compiled and circulated
to interested stakeholders. Taking these comments into account, an overall
strategy will be developed. The recommended demonstration projects and
funding levels and partners will form the basis of the strategy. It
is anticipated that the strategy will be submitted for funding approval
in the fall of 2002.
Stakeholder views
on these proposals are an important element of the Canadian resource
recovery strategy process. Your views are greatly appreciated
6. Appendix I
Attachment
I
Canadian
Resource Recovery Strategy
Draft
Format to Identify Potential Projects
- Title
- Originator (with
address an contact information by e-mail, Fax and telephone.)
- Brief description
of proposed project
- Type of project:
industrial, post-consumer, institutional.
- Geographical Emphasis:
north of 60th parallel, urban and/or rural.
- Estimated impact
on material and/or energy recovery.
- Estimated total
cost of the project, and estimated timeframes.
- Potential partners
in project.
- Estimated funding
sources and levels
Attachment
II
Consultations on a Canadian Resource Recovery Strategy
Yellowknife/Northwest Territories & Yukon Consultation - April 22,
2002
Yellowknife Inn - (Copper Room)
Agenda
8:00 am |
Registration
& Refreshments |
|
8:30 am |
Welcome and
Introductions |
Royer
Yates |
8:40 am |
Round Table
Introductions |
All |
9:00 am |
Overview on
CRRS Strategy |
Mike Clapham |
9:20 am |
Round Table
Discussions on Priorities and Issues:
- Industrial
- Institutional
- North of 60o
- Post-consumer |
Chair:
Carole Burnham |
10:30 am |
Break |
|
10:45 am |
Introduction
of Issues to be addressed by breakout Groups |
Chair: Carole
Burnham |
11:00 am |
Breakout Group
Discussions |
All |
12:00 pm |
Networking
buffet lunch |
|
12:45 pm |
Breakout Groups
Continue Discussions |
All |
2:00 pm |
Groups Report
to Plenary / Group |
|
2:30 pm |
Break |
|
2:45 pm |
Round Table
Closing Comments/Issues |
All |
3:30 pm |
Next Steps |
Mike Clapham |
3:45 pm |
Summary/Thank-you |
Royer Yates |
4:00 pm |
Adjourn |
|
Attachment
III
Consultations on a Canadian Resource Recovery Strategy
Yellowknife/Northwest Territories & Yukon Consultation - April 22,
2002
List of Participants
City of
Yellowknife
H. Julian Huang
(867) 920-5697
jhuang@city.yellowknife.nt.ca
City of Yellowknife
Mayor Gordon Van Tighem
(867) 920-5693
gvantighem@city.yellowknife.nt.ca
City of Yellowknife
Bruce Underhay
(867) 669-3404
bailfac@city.yellowknife.nt.ca
Diavik Diamonds
Brenda Kuzyk
(867) 609-6508
brenda.kuzyk@diavik.com
Federation of Canadian
Municipalities
Sherri Watson
(613) 792-1357
smwatson@magma.ca
Government of Northwest
Territories
Emery Paquin
(867) 873-7654
emery_paquin@gov.nt.ca
GroundTrax (Yukon)
Inc. Environmental Systems
Sue Greetham
867-660-4629
greetham@marshlake.polarcom.com
Hatch
Carole Burnham
(416) 445-0500
cburnham@attcanada.ca
Hatch
Roger Yates
(905) 403-4131
ryates@hatch.ca
Inuvik, Inuit Elder
Albert Bernhardt
(867) 777-1341
No e-mail (via Barbara Armstrong)
Inuvik Recycling
Society (and AB Salvage)
Barbara Armstrong (867) 777-2072
recycle@permafrost.com
Miramar Giant Mine
Ltd.
Ron Connell
(867) 669-3725
ron_Connell@nt.sympatico.ca
NRCan
Mike Clapham
(613) 992-4404
mclapham@nrcan.gc.ca
Originals by T-BO
Francois Thibeau
(867) 873-5672
No e-mail (via Matthew Grogono)
Prospector, Dump
Stacker
Walter Humphries
(867) 873-5432
baldwin@internorth.com
Raven Recycling
Society, Whitehorse, Yukon
Padraig Holohou
(867) 667-7269
operations@ravenrecycling.org
Recycling Council
of Alberta
Christina Seidel
(403) 843-6563
cseidel@telusplanet.net
Terra Verra Co.
Gary Vaillancourt
(867) 766-2507
No e-mail (via Matthew Grogono)
Yellowknife Glass
Recycling
Matthew Grogono
(867) 669-7654
grogono@internorth.com
Did not Attend
but Request Documentation:
Artist Run Community Centre (Aurora Arts Society)
Arlene Yaceyko
ayaceyko@excite.com
City of Yellowknife
Katherine Silcock
867-920-5689
ksilcock@city.yellowknife.nt.ca
Last Modified: 2002-12-19 |
|
|