| |
Consultations
on a Canadian Resource Recovery Strategy Summary of Edmonton/Prairie
Provinces Consultation
Held at Edmonton, AB on April 23, 2002
1. Background
Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) is holding a series of consultation
sessions over the spring of 2002 on the development of a Canadian
Resource Recovery Strategy. Sessions are being held in seven locations
including Vancouver, Yellowknife, Edmonton, Toronto, Halifax, Montreal
and Iqaluit. Representatives from industry, non-governmental organisations
and all levels of government are being invited to participate. The
objectives of these sessions are to identify:
- Resource
recovery priorities in urban and rural communities across Canada;
- Resource
recovery priorities in Canada's North;
- Barriers
to resource recovery in every region;
- Potential
resource recovery demonstration projects in industrial, post-consumer
and institutional sectors;
- Estimated
levels of project funding and co-funding partners.
In Edmonton,
the day-long consultation session began with an introduction by
each participant, followed by an overview from Mike Clapham, NRCan,
of the Canadian Resource Recovery Strategy (see Background Paper,
Attachment I). Bob Mitchell (Alberta Environment), Christina Seidel
(Recycling Council of Alberta), Dr. Ashley Nixon (Shell Canada)
and Wyn Van der Schee (City of Calgary) provided introductory comments
about resource recovery issues, priorities, barriers and opportunities.
The group then discussed in plenary resource recovery issues in
the Prairie Provinces, identified criteria for selecting resource
recovery projects, the roles of different stakeholders in the development
and demonstration of projects and barriers to resource recovery.
Participants met in breakout groups to identify several potential
resource recovery projects for potential co- funding by NRCan.
A copy of the agenda and the list of participants in Edmonton are
attached (Attachments II and III). There were 26 participants representing
resource recyclers and recycling associations, the Cities of Calgary
and Edmonton, the Centre for Environmental Technology Advancement,
industry, the Government of Alberta, the Alberta Research Council,
Alberta's Industrial Heartland, local entrepreneurs, the Federation
of Canadian Municipalities and consultants. The majority of participants
were from Alberta with one representative from Saskatchewan and
one from Manitoba.
2. Items of Note in the Discussion
- NRCan was
congratulated for seeking input to a Canadian Resource Recovery
Strategy in advance of developing the strategy.
- Resource
recovery was recognized as an important means of achieving greenhouse
gas emissions reduction.
- Some discussion
centred on the overall goal for the Canadian Resource Recovery
Strategy.
- It was suggested
that it should be 'zero waste' or '100% product' or ' the last
garbage can'. While participants agreed in general that there
should be a paradigm shift to thinking of waste as a resource,
agreement was not reached on the precise wording for the overall
goal. It was noted that 'zero waste' means different things to
different people and that this wording should not be adopted as
a goal without an in-depth discussion and explanation.
- It was suggested
that community and economic development planning should be carried
out using eco-industrial or industrial ecological principles.
- It was suggested
that 'alternative' advertising industry should be approached to
address the perception that recycled products are suspect.
- It was suggested
that products made from recycled resources should not be labelled
as being 'recycled' to address the negative perception of recycled
products.
- While resource
recovery projects were recognized as important in a Canadian Resource
Recovery Strategy, it was noted that it was also important to
address policies affecting resource recovery.
3. Resource
Recovery Issues
Participants identified the resource recovery issues listed in Table
3-1.
Table
3-1: Resource Recovery Issues in the Prairies
Issue |
Industrial
|
Institutional/ Commercial
|
Post-consumer
|
Paper |
Y
|
Y
|
|
Cardboard |
Y
|
Y
|
|
Compostable organics |
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Animal waste |
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Computers |
Y
|
|
|
Forest waste |
Y
|
|
|
Yard waste |
|
|
Y
|
Food waste |
|
|
Y
|
Flared gas |
Y
|
|
|
Mercury from vehicles (switches,
batteries) |
|
|
Y
|
Plastics |
|
|
Y
|
Carbon recovery |
Y
|
|
|
Construction, renovation and demolition
materials |
Y
|
Y
|
|
Sulphur |
Y
|
|
|
Fibre optic cable |
Y
|
Y
|
|
Pressure treated lumber |
Y
|
|
Y
|
Railway ties |
Y
|
|
|
Water |
Y
|
|
|
Industrial waste heat |
Y
|
|
|
Household hazardous waste, e.g.
paint |
|
|
Y
|
Waste exchange leftovers |
Y
|
Y
|
|
Fly ash |
Y
|
|
|
Dry cell batteries (household
rechargeables + alkaline) |
|
|
Y
|
4. Criteria for Selecting Priorities
The session participants identified the following criteria for selecting
resource recovery project priorities:
-
Quantity
of waste by weight and/or volume
-
Potential
environmental impact
-
-
Sustainability
(including social, environmental, financial)
-
Time
to implement (should be sooner rather than later)
-
-
Potential
for significant economic benefit
-
Potential
for social benefits
-
A
costly problem to resolve
-
Effectiveness
in saving natural resources
-
Potentially
exportable to other countries
-
Availability
of market for recovered materials
-
Evidence
of support by industry and the public (It was noted that lack
of support does not necessarily mean that the issue should not
be addressed.)
-
Addresses
a local concern
-
Fosters
sustainable behaviour
-
Evidence
that intervention of a demonstration project in the marketplace
will kick-start the market
5. Barriers
Participants identified the following barriers to resource recovery:
-
-
Environmental
impacts of transportation
-
Low
landfill costs (low tipping fees)
-
Externalized
environmental costs (social and environmental costs not included
in cost of product or tipping fees)
-
Life
cycle analysis not carried out on resource recovery solutions
-
Successful
urban programs are not necessarily viable in rural areas - there
are vast rural areas in the Prairies
-
Low
volumes of wastes in remote areas make resource recovery economically
unattractive
-
Lack
of recycling (collection, storage) infrastructure
-
Uncertain
or non-existent markets for products containing recycled materials
-
Lack
of match between supply and demand of secondary resources
-
Concerns
about quality of material being recycled and quality of products
produced from recycled materials
-
Negative
perception of recycled products
-
Resistance
by public and elected officials to resource recovery because of
the perception that recycling costs more than alternatives
-
Lack
of locally available technologies (need to learn from experience
outside Canada)
-
Lack
of funding to implement projects/technologies locally
-
Aversion
by financial institutions to invest in environmental and recycling
technologies because of perceived environmental and economic risk
-
Consumer
indifference to resource recovery/recycled products
-
Lack
of capitalization of resource recovery projects
-
Lack
of marketing skills by resource recovery entrepreneurs
-
Start-up
costs of resource recovery projects
-
Lack
of depth/capacity in start-ups
- Lack of continuity
of education/awareness programs
- Lack of availability
of recycled products in retail stores
- Higher cost of
recycled products
- Competition to
secondary resource products from suppliers of natural resources
- Markets for recycled
products tend to be 'niche' markets
- Lack of incentives
in the Industrial Commercial Institutional (ICI) sector to reuse,
recycle
- Lack of emphasis
on product substitution
- Comfort with
the status quo
- Need to connect
resource recovery technology users with the R&D community
- Current product
standards and management process standards prohibit or discourage
use of recycled materials (ISO/EMS)
- Not In My Backyard
syndrome, e.g. pyrolysis
Main Groupings of Barriers |
- Remote and low density populations result in long transportation
distances and low volumes that make collection and recovery
of materials very costly
- Capitalization, marketing, capacity gaps associated with start-ups
exacerbated by investor concerns about environmental risks
- Lack of collection, storage infrastructure
- Life cycle and social and environmental costs not included
in costs of products
- Lack of public and political will to recover resources
- Price fluctuations in natural resource commodities affect
competitiveness of recycled resources
|
6. Roles
The following roles for governments (all 3 levels) to play in enhancing
resource recovery were identified:
Roles for Governments
- Policies to encourage
green power (e.g. dollar incentives, tax incentives similar to flowthroughs
for mining companies)
- Laws and regulations
that encourage resource recovery rather than disposal
- Standards and
certification for resource recovery (specify when and how a product
can legitimately claim to be recycled)
- Market incentives
that are softer than fiscal instruments, e.g. rebates for low water
use faucets, energy efficient light bulbs, and green box for recyclables,
etc.
- Lead by example,
e.g. procurement of products with recycled content, practice product
stewardship, etc.
- Coordinate with
other government levels, extended producer responsibility programs,
harmonization of regulations, initiatives across Canada
- Use Canadian
Council of Ministers of the Environment to coordinate across Canada
- Help provincial
levels deal with international companies
- Build capacity
in institutions through education and awareness and by providing know-how
- Recover methane
from landfill
- Provide financial
incentives for resource recovery
- Institute/require
full cost accounting
- Pressure to
'design for environment'
7. Opportunities
Group discussion revealed the following opportunities for improving
resource recovery in the region:
- Build on/extend
current successes, e.g. tire program in Alberta
- Government and
large industry should show leadership in procurement of products containing
recovered resources.
- Consider cogeneration
projects
- Consider combined
heat and power projects, district heating, etc.
- Opportunities
for improved networking/sharing of experience and information should
be considered.
- Map secondary
resources in a manner similar to the mapping of natural resources
by the Geological Survey of Canada
- Partnership models,
e.g. work with suppliers to provide 'recyclable' or 'green' alternates,
e.g. glue that dissolves in water
- Consider integrated
approaches to resource recovery, use a suite of tools/approaches
8. Projects
Participants identified a variety of possible resource recovery projects
in the region. These are presented in Table 8-1 below under the headings
of crosscutting, post-consumer, institutional and industrial projects.
Participants were encouraged to consider the following questions when
introducing projects:
- What is the project?
- Who is the proponent
of the project?
- What resource
recovery issue does it address?
- Who are the potential
or existing partners and co-funders?
- What is the estimated
cost?
- What sector/barrier
does the project address?
Details of project submissions received after the April 23 session are
given in Table 8-2.
Table 8-1: Potential Resource Recovery Projects
Project
|
Sponsor
|
Impact
|
Cost
|
Potential Partners
|
CROSS-CUTTING |
Develop an integrated
organic matter utilization system that manages agricultural and
municipal waste and produces biogas and fertilizer |
|
- Addresses major public concern about agricultural wastes,
recovers energy, saves natural resources
|
|
Alberta Research Council,
Alberta Cattle Producers, and Agriculture Canada |
Recover waste heat from
industry for use in district heating and greenhouses |
|
- Recovers energy, creates local jobs, saves transportation
costs/impacts for delivery of produce
|
|
Alberta's Industrial
Heartland |
Inventory secondary resources
(similar to natural resource geological surveys) - include wind?
|
Alberta Environment |
|
|
Recycling Council of
Alberta, Alberta Environment, and NRCB? |
Establish a Resource
Recovery Centre of Excellence - Industrial Commercial & Institutional
(ICI) waste needs should be included |
|
- Connect service providers with customers
- Provide training
- Technology commercialization
- Business start-up
|
|
Municipalities? Researchers?
|
National study of landfill
full cost pricing to understand regional differences and relation
between resource recovery markets and landfill pricing and banning
of material from landfills. Need to flesh out terms of reference
- should study be by individual commodity or not? Costs to be included:
property, disposal, construction, operation, monitoring, closure
|
Recycling Council of
Alberta |
- Addresses full cost accounting barrier
- Helps make certain types of recycling viable
- Establish a benchmark of best practice
|
~$500k |
Green Municipal Fund,
NRCan ICI/corporate, Solid Waste Association of North America (SWANA),
and Alberta Environment |
Biomass Gasifier Based
Combined Heat, Power and Greenhouse project. Demonstration of biomass
gasifier to generate energy from current nonrecyclables and supply
energy to greenhouse. The project is applicable to small communities
(over 35,000 population) with landfill issues, and to lumber operations.
Demonstration project will handle 52,000 tonnes/year of waste wood,
plastic, cardboard, sewage sludge, etc.; up to 4.2 MW power can
be produced. (A project sheet has been submitted.) |
WinterGardens |
- Designed for small communities; applicable to remote northern
communities
- Addresses post- industrial, post- consumer
- Reduce landfill GHG
- Reduces fuel transportation costs for produce
- Could be marketed internationally
|
Total cost $13 Million.
(Phase I: $3.65Million Phase II: $4.4 Million Phase III: $5 Million)
Funds from NRCan: up to $850,000 in Phase I |
Whitefish Lake First
Nation, Private company, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern
Development (DIAND), Climate Change Action Fund (CCAF), Banks, and
Power producers. |
Computer/Electronics
Recycling Program for Saskatchewan. Modify existing facilities to
establish electronics recycling program in Saskatchewan. Advanced
Disposal Fee will pay for program (fee estimated: 1½ -2% of retail
value for CPU, printer, keyboards and peripherals; 4% for CRT monitors).
(A project sheet was submitted prior to the consultation session.)
|
SARCAN Recycling |
- Provides employment for adults with disabilities
- Markets (diverts from landfill) all electronics
- Addresses post- consumer, industrial, institutional sectors
|
$120k (?) to establish
the pilot program, after 1 year. |
ITAC, Electronics retailers
and manufacturers, Industry Canada, NRCan, Govt. of Saskatchewan,
Rehabilitation Centres of Saskatchewan, and Disabled Workers.
Funding from federal or provincial governments could be directed
to public education. |
Turn Calgary landfill
cell into a methane digester, mine the remaining compost |
City of Calgary |
- Recovers energy and materials from landfill
- Saves natural resources
|
|
|
Cleanit Greenit Composting
Site. Establish a composting project to address up to 40,000 tonnes/year
of non- hazardous organic waste (ICI or municipal or both) using
Cleanit Greenit Composting technology. (A project sheet has been
submitted.) |
Cleanit Greenit Composting
System Inc. |
- Diverts material from landfill
- Saves natural resources
|
$ 4 Million
$500,000 is requested from NRCan
|
City of Calgary, City
of Cochrane, KC Environmental Group Ltd., businesses providing wastes,
IRAP/NRC or TEAM, and CRRS/NRCan. |
Establish a website based
clearing house (waste exchange) dedicated to commercial and residential
demolition wastes |
K-Lor Contractors |
- Diverts material from landfill
- Saves natural resources
|
|
|
Establish collection
systems for end of life products from ICI locations |
|
- Diverts material from landfills
- Extends landfill life
|
|
|
POST-CONSUMER |
Provide collection infrastructure
for public service areas, e.g. gas stations |
|
|
|
Recycling Council of
Alberta, Alberta Environment, BCMB?, AUOMA? |
Gasify residuals from
post-consumer waste stream to produce energy (waste biomass and
automotive shredder residue could also be included). Techno- economical
feasibility study will be completed in fall of 2002 (partially funded
by Green Municipal Enabling Fund). The next step will be a 20 MW
demonstration facility. (A project sheet has been submitted.) |
City of Edmonton |
- Recovers energy
- Reduce GHG emissions
- Diverts material from landfill
- Saves natural resources
|
$80 Million to $100 Million
(1.5-2.5 yrs) NRCan funds up to 50%; (City of Edmonton 10%, industry
partner up to 80%) |
Epcor, Alberta Research
Council, University of Alberta, gasifier technology vendor, federal
and provincial governments (capital cost & policy support: GHG credits,
clean energy incentives). |
INSTITUTIONAL |
Carry out onsite composting
in remote areas (municipal waste from small remote areas). |
|
- Diverts material from landfill
|
|
Northern Care |
Investigate/assess small-scale
technology applications and collection options for rural/ remote
communities, e.g. baler twine |
|
|
|
Northern Care Agriculture
Canada |
Energy from landfill
gas using fuel cell technology. Demonstrate the feasibility of using
new stationary fuel cell technology to produce electrical energy
directly from landfill gas. 2x600 kW demo units. (A project sheet
has been submitted.) |
City of Edmonton |
- Energy recovery at higher efficiency
- GHG reduction
- Applicable to rural Canada
|
$ 5 Million. NRCan up
to 50% (City of Edmonton 10%, industry partner up to 80%) |
Alberta Research Council,
University of Alberta, Utilities, Fuel cell technology vendor, federal
and provincial governments (capital cost & policy support: GHG credits,
clean energy incentives). |
Zero Waste/Organics Recycling
Initiative. Carryout a demonstration project in the Bow Valley to
test options for low-cost centralized composting (low-tech) in mid-
sized rural communities; include full cost analysis, identify barriers
and costs. Develop an alternative to the shipping the waste for
landfill in Calgary area (140 km away) at a cost of $60/tonne; convert
10,000 tonnes/year of organic waste into compost and soil amendment
products. (Description includes details from project sheet submitted
after the April 23 consultation.) |
Bow Valley Waste Management
Commission (BVWMC) |
- Diverts municipal solid waste from landfill
- Convert waste into compost and soil amendment products
- GHG reduction (much lower transportation distance)
|
Phase I (12- 18 months):
$140,000 Phase II (12 months): $ 3 Million
Total: $3.14 Million. |
Federal and Provincial
governments, Member Municipalities, Banff National Park, and Private
Partnerships. |
INDUSTRIAL |
Find new market opportunities
for sulphur
- sulphuric acid
- agriculture use |
Alberta's Industrial
Heartland |
|
|
Shell
Syncrude
Suncor |
Assess barriers to recovering
industrial wastewater being deep-well injected |
|
|
|
Newalta, and the Alberta
Energy Utility Board (AEUB) |
Develop recovery options
for fast food waste stream, e.g. composting options, packaging improvements
(biodegradable) |
|
|
|
Alberta Research Council,
And the Recycling Council of Alberta |
Develop methods to remove
flammable materials clinging to steel from recycled tires |
Tire Recycling Management
Association of Alberta |
- Currently steel recyclers are reluctant to take steel from
recovered tires (due to risk posed by flammable materials clinging
to metal).
|
|
|
Replace wooden poles
and ties that require toxic preservatives with composite poles and
ties made from end of life products |
Recycling Council of
Alberta |
- Avoids contamination due to toxic preservatives
- Saves natural resources
|
|
|
Roofing Product from
Recycled Tires. Develop a lean manufacturing model that can be replicated;
to optimize layout and material flows for manufacturing facility
that makes roofing product from recycled tires; could also address
product standards; model applicable to any end- of-life product
recycling operation. (A project sheet has been submitted.) |
CETAC-West (on behalf
of GEM Inc.) |
- Addresses barrier of undercapitalization of start-ups
- Addresses gaps of funding for marketing & business & facility
design
- Diverts waste from landfill
- Maximize beneficial use of recycled tires
- Reduce demand for asphalt shingles, energy intensive clay
tiles and wooden shingles
|
Manufacturing study:
$50k-$100k (2-4 months) Existing plant upgrade: $500k-$1M (6mo.-1year)
|
GEM Inc. and Sustainable Development Technology
Canada (SDTC).
(50% from GEM Inc. and 50% equity or loan from
SDTC is foreseen for both the manufacturing study and the existing
plant upgrade.)
|
Table
8-2: Project submissions received after the April 23 consultation
Project
|
Sponsor
|
Impact
|
Cost
|
Potential Partners
|
INDUSTRIAL |
Wood Waste Mulch Project for Forestry Industry
in Alberta. A mulch facility to handle 100,000 tonnes/year of wood
waste generated by the forestry industry in Alberta. Project requires
some research and development. Target markets for the mulch include
the landscaping industry and the oil and gas reclamation sector.
(A project sheet has been submitted.) |
KC Environmental Group Ltd. |
- Diverts wood waste from landfill
- Reduce greenhouse gases
- Convert waste into soil rejuvenation products
|
$ 3 Million over three years.
$600,000 sought from NRCan |
Weyerhauser or Millar Eastern. (KC
Environmental Group Ltd will cover $500k, Business Bank of Canada
$400 k, and the forestry company $1,500 k multi-year processing
contract). |
POST-CONSUMER |
Public Area Recycling Options. This project will
address the lack of adequate recycling infrastructure in public
service areas such as gas stations and convenience stores. Volumes
and composition of waste will first be quantified with the objective
of developing options to divert viable portions of this waste stream.
The primary focus will be on packaging waste including beverage
containers, oil containers, windshield washer jugs, and snack food
packaging. An enhanced recycling infrastructure for public service
areas will then be implemented. (A project sheet has been submitted.)
|
Recycling Council of Alberta |
- Divert waste from landfill
- Develop and implement viable options to divert packaging waste
|
Research Phase I: $120,000 Implementation
Phase II: $1,000,000 |
Alberta Environment, Alberta Used
Oil Management Association, Beverage Container Management Board.
|
Rural Municipal Compost Facility. A demonstration
project designed to divert organic material from the residential
waste stream to a centrally-located municipal composting facility.
This project will supplement existing backyard composting program
(not all residents have one; often inadequate to handle all the
yard clippings and organic waste generated by a household). The
municipal composting program will also encourage wider participation
of residents in composting through education. (A project sheet has
been submitted.) |
Northern Coordinated Action for Recycling
Enterprises (Northern CARE) |
- Reduce waste going to landfill in rural northern Alberta
- Supplement existing backyard composting initiative, particularly
when volumes exceed the capacity of individual units.
- Reduce demand for chemicals and fertilizers
- Extend landfill life
- Raise public awareness of the benefits of composting
|
To be determined. |
Alberta Environment (Action on Waste),
Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), Recycling Council of
Alberta, Natural Resources Canada, Northern Alberta Development
Council, Northern Alberta rural municipalities, and local businesses
and industries. |
CONSULTATIONS ON A CANADIAN RESOURCE RECOVERY STRATEGY
-
A Background Paper -
April 12, 2002
1. Introduction
Resource recovery seeks to recover materials and energy at the end of
product life in an economic, social and environmentally sustainable
manner. Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) wishes to identify potential
demonstration resource recovery projects that are reflective of Canada's
unique circumstances. These projects will form the basis of a Canadian
Resource Recovery Strategy.
NRCan is undertaking a consultative process with all interested partners
to solicit their views and ideas in a series of discussion fora to identify
resource recovery priorities and recommend economic and environmentally
sustainable demonstration projects for co-funding. Your input to this
process is being sought.
NRCan is targeting to identify projects, funding partners and levels
that can be incorporated in a resource recovery strategy that reflects
the needs of all regions across Canada. From these consultations a business
case will be developed and presented to federal senior management in
the fall of 2002.
2. The Process
Consultations are planned during April and May in the following locations:
- Vancouver, B.C.
covering B.C. and the Yukon
- Edmonton, Alberta
covering Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba
- Yellowknife,
N.W.T. covering the North West Territories
- Toronto, ON covering
Ontario
- Montreal, QC
covering Quebec
- Halifax, N.S.
covering Atlantic Canada
- Iqaluit, Nunavut
covering Nunavut
The objectives of
the consultations are to identify:
- resource recovery
priorities in urban and rural communities across Canada;
- resource recovery
priorities north of Canada's 60th parallel;
- barriers to resource
recovery in each region;
- potential resource
recovery demonstration projects in industrial, post-consumer and institutional
sectors;
- estimated levels
of project funding and co-funding partners.
Participants are
requested to come to the meeting with one or more of the following:
- local resource
recovery issues and opportunities;
- sectoral resource
recovery issues and opportunities, i.e. industrial, institutional,
post- consumer;
- barriers encountered
in addressing the above issues and opportunities;
- potential demonstration
projects that need co-funding to implement.
A draft format for identifying potential demonstration projects is attached
for your consideration (see Appendix I). One form for each potential
demonstration project should be completed and taken to the consultation
meeting.
The priorities, barriers and demonstration projects identified over
the course of the consultations will be compiled in notes that will
be transmitted to all participants. NRCan will use the results of the
consultations to recommend demonstration projects for co-funding by
the federal government.
3. CONTEXT
3.1 Background
Domestic and global demand for recycling and recycled products has been
steadily increasing, and will continue. Both industrialized and non-industrialized
economies are being challenged to be efficient and competitive, and
to ensure the environmentally sound management of products and materials
throughout their life cycle.
The recycling of products is becoming a highly competitive growth industry.
Recycling is recognized as being resource efficient and is one of the
means of achieving industrial and commercial stewardship together with
associated reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Domestic and international
pressure for the adoption of prevention-oriented measures that maximize
the material and energy efficiency of products in their design and manufacture
is growing. This pressure is creating opportunities for cost-effective
and environmentally sound recycling and reuse of products at the end
of their planned economic life.
Canada has been blessed with geography and geology rich in naturally
occurring resources. Due to the multi-elemental complexity of many ore
bodies, the challenges presented in harvesting multiple species of forest
resources and oil exploration and extraction, Canada has unique and
highly specialized competencies in natural resource management and production
expertise. This specialized resource management knowledge base combined
with existing infrastructure of modern processes and production facilities,
provide a significant advantage in managing complex recyclable resource
materials arising from both post industrial and post consumer sectors.
Small and Medium-size Enterprises (SME's) have their own special opportunities,
needs and challenges. For them, a typical challenge is to secure access
to small-scale technologies and processes for resource recovery that
are affordable and cost-effective, and that do not necessarily rely
on direct or regular access to more sophisticated centralized recovery
facilities. SME's remain the backbone of Canada's economy, responsible
for a high proportion of employment, growth.
In absolute terms resource recovery operations are most attractive in
urbanized regions, but in relative terms can occasionally be of greater
significance in sensitive rural and remote areas. The North would be
a particularly significant case in point, as would be valuable farming
and tourism areas and regions with delicate ecosystems and valued natural
amenities. In communities and regions where haulage of recyclable materials
to centralize recovery operations is too costly or impractical, local
small-scale recovery enterprises may present an attractive alternative
and opportunity.
Canada has an opportunity to establish itself as a global leader in
niche areas of resource recovery, with a positive image as a responsible
life-cycle manager of products. There is a need to develop and promote
Canadian technologies and approaches that can compete in the growing
global market for viable and environmentally responsible resource recovery
technologies and expertise. In order for this to happen Canada has to
remain an active and credible participant in international policy developments
affecting both global markets for recyclable materials and the access
to foreign markets of Canadian products.
3.2 The Canadian Resource Recovery Strategy
NRCan is facilitating the development of a Canadian resource recovery
strategy. Canada needs a strategy for the following reasons:
- to improve material
and resource efficiencies,
- reduce environmental
impacts of resource use,
- contribute to
Canada's plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,
- address the unique
challenges and opportunities to resource recovery posed by Canada's
geography, population distribution and climate,
- position Canada
to be a global leader in niche areas of resource recovery.
Resource recovery consists of measures to maximize the economic opportunities
and success in - recovering products (and by-products), materials and
energy at the end of product life, and putting them back to work in
the economy through recycling and reuse.
A resource recovery strategy focuses on the promotion and support of
innovative product design and supportive public, private and consumer
policies and practices that a.) increase the recoverability of valuable
material and energy resources at the end of product life; b.) improve
access to recoverable products, materials and energy (including product
components and by- products) by those involved in the recycling and
reuse sectors; and c.) enhance the efficiency and environmental soundness
of recycling and reuse. Cost-effective and environmentally sound resource
recovery optimizes the productive use of natural resources, minimizes
waste generation and related treatment and disposal costs and supports
industrial innovation and competitiveness.
Effective resource recovery efforts involve complex policy, technology,
regulatory, and infrastructure issues that transcend traditional industrial,
commercial, institutional and consumer sector and inter-jurisdictional
boundaries. Strong partnerships with provinces/territories, communities,
industry, consumers and public stakeholder groups are vital to successful
approaches. The establishment of a consultation process identifying
projects that will have an impact on the recovery of materials currently
going to waste is an essential start.
Three key elements need to be addressed when developing a cost-effective,
environmentally sound resource recovery strategy than can advance Canada's
sustainable development goals:
- How to inform,
influence and engage decision-makers in governments, industry, non-
governmental organizations and Canadians generally in taking appropriate
action in resource recovery activities. Shifting the paradigm, from
considering end-of-life products and materials as a waste to looking
at them as valuable resources to be recovered for further economic
use, will be crucial to increased recovery activities
- How to advance
technologies, processes and supporting institutional networks and
infrastructure so that they better support resource recovery. The
availability of cost- effective and environmentally sound technologies,
infrastructure, equipment and processes is vital to the growth and
development of domestic resource recovery operations. This includes
both upstream technologies and approaches for the design of products
that are amenable to cost-effective recovery at the end of their planned
economic life, and downstream technologies and approaches for the
efficient and effective diversion, extraction, separation, reuse and
recycling of materials and energy
- How to create
and maintain a policy and regulatory environment that facilitates
and reinforces cost-effective and environmentally sound resource recovery.
At the heart of a viable resource recovery sector in Canada is a favourable
domestic climate for investment in, and operation of, resources recovery
operations. The complex array of regulatory and other policy measures
affecting the operation and financing of resource recovery operations
influence profoundly the overall financial and operational viability
of many reuse and recycling initiatives.
4. Project Criteria
Demonstration projects are to be identified that:
- will develop
and promote Canadian technologies and approaches that can compete
in the growing global market for viable and environmentally responsible
resource recovery technologies and expertise;
- inform, influence
and engage decision-makers in governments, industry, non-governmental
organizations and Canadians generally in taking appropriate action
in resource recovery activities;
- advance technologies,
processes and supporting institutional networks and infrastructure
so that they better support resource recovery;
- create and maintain
a policy and regulatory environment that facilitates and reinforces
cost- effective and environmentally sound resource recovery.
The projects should:
- be capable of
being economically, environmentally and socially sustainable;
- have willing
partners from other levels of government, industry, community groups
and other interested stakeholders;
- recover products
and materials at the end-of-life for industrial, institutional and
post consumer levels of society;
- address local
priorities and have active local champions,
- be reasonably
well-defined
- need co-funding
to implement.
5. Conclusions and Next Steps
Following the stakeholder consultation sessions and any written comments
submitted by May 31, 2002, a summary of the comments received will be
compiled and circulated to interested stakeholders. Taking these comments
into account, an overall strategy will be developed. The recommended
demonstration projects and funding levels and partners will form the
basis of the strategy. It is anticipated that the strategy will be submitted
for funding approval in the fall of 2002.
Stakeholder views on these proposals are an important element of the
Canadian resource recovery strategy process. Your views are greatly
appreciated.
6. Appendix I
Canadian
Resource Recovery Strategy
Draft Format to Identify Potential Projects
- Title
- Originator (with
address an contact information by e-mail, Fax and telephone.)
- Brief description
of proposed project
- Type of project:
industrial, post-consumer, institutional.
- Geographical
Emphasis: north of 60th parallel, urban and/or rural.
- Estimated impact
on material and/or energy recovery.
- Estimated total
cost of the project, and estimated timeframes.
- Potential partners
in project.
- Estimated funding
sources and levels
Attachment II
Consultations on a Canadian Resource Recovery Strategy
Edmonton/Prairie Provinces Consultation - April 23, 2002
Sheraton Grande Edmonton Hotel - (Winterlake Room)
Agenda
8:00 am |
Registration & Refreshments |
|
8:30 am |
Welcome / Workshop Objectives |
Roger Yates
|
8:40 am |
Round Table Introductions |
All
|
9:00 am |
Overview of CRRS Strategy |
Mike Clapham
|
9:20 am |
Panel Introductions |
|
9:30 am |
Panel Discussion on Priorities, Issues Relating
to Urban and Rural Contexts: |
Invited Local Representatives
|
|
- Industrial
- Institutional
- Post-consumer
|
J. Ashley Nixon, Shell Canada
Bob Mitchell, Albert Government Wyn Vander Schee, City of Calgary
Christina Seidel, Recycling Council
|
10:15 am |
Break |
|
10:30 am |
Plenary Discussion |
All
|
11:15 am |
Introduction of Issues to be addressed by breakout
Groups |
Carole Burnham
|
11:30 am |
Breakout Group Discussions |
All
|
12:30 pm |
Networking buffet lunch |
|
1:15 pm |
Breakout Groups - Continue Discussions |
All
|
3:00 pm |
Break |
|
3:15 pm |
Groups Report to Plenary/Group Discussion |
Chair: Carole Burnham
|
3:45 pm |
Round Table Closing Comments/Issues |
All
|
4:15 pm |
Next Steps |
Mike Clapham
|
4:30 pm |
Summary / Thank You's |
Roger Yates
|
4:45 pm |
Adjourn |
|
Attachment III
Consultations on a Canadian Resource Recovery Strategy Edmonton/Prairie
Provinces Consultation - April 23, 2002
List of Participants
Alberta's Industrial Heartland
Larry Wall
780-414-0066
larrywall@industrialheartland.com
Alberta Research Council
Stacey Schaub- Szabo
780-450-5360
szabo@arc.ab.ca
Alberta Research Council
Xiaomei Li
780-450-5290
xiaomei@arc.ab.ca
Ascherwordsmith
Avery Ascher
204-624-5548
avery@ascherwordsmith.com
ABCRC (Beverage Container Recycling Corp.)
Guy West
403-264-0170
gwest@abcrc.com
Alberta Government
Bob Mitchell (Panellist)
780-422-8464
Bob.Mitchell@gov.ab.ca
Alberta Government
Judy Morris
780-422-2144
Judy.Morris@gov.ab.ca
AMEC
Gary Willson
403-569-6515
Gary.Willson@amec.com
Alberta Plastics Recycling Association
Douglas Flood
780-426-1493
dflood@cpia.ca
Bow Valley Waste Mgmt Commission/ Wild Earth Associates Inc.
Al Tinholt
403-609-0321
BVWMC@wildearth.ab.ca
The City of Calgary
Wyn Van der Schee (Panellist)
403-230-6631
wyn.vanderschee@gov.calgary.ab.ca
The City of Edmonton
Bud Latta
780-496-5415
bud.latta@gov.edmonton.ab.ca
DOW Chemical Canada Inc.
Thomas Pearson
780-998-8292
tpearson@dow.com
CETAC West
Don Colley
403-777-9595
dcolley@cetacwest.com
Federation of Canadian Municipalities
Sherri Watson
613-792-1357
smwatson@magma.ca
Hatch
Carole Burnham (Facilitator)
416-445-0500
cburnham@attcanada.ca
Hatch
Roger Yates (Facilitator)
905-403-4131
ryates@hatch.ca
K-Lor Contractors Services Ltd.
Dan Zembal
403-255-7303
dzembal@sitecleanup.com
Newalta
Peter Dwan
403-236-2203
pdwan@newalta.com
Northern Coordinated Action for Recycling Enterprises
Christine Della Costa
780-732-9311
executivedirector@northerncare.org
NRCan
Mike Clapham
613-992-4404
mclapham@nrcan.gc.ca
Organic Soil/Cleanit Greenit Composting System Inc.
Kirstin Castro- Wunsch
780-488-7926
kirstin@cleanitgreenit.net
Recycling Council of Alberta
Christina Seidel (Panellist)
403-843-6563
cseidel@telusplanet.net
SARCAN Recycling
Kevin Acton
306-933-0616
kacton@sarcan.sk.ca
Shell Canada
J. Ashley Nixon (Panellist)
403-691-4965
ashley.Nixon@shell.ca
Telus Corporation
(also: Recycling Council of Alberta -- President)
Wendy Luther
780-493-7347
wendy.luther@telus.com
Tire Recycling Management Association of Alberta
J. Kevin O'Neil
780-990-1111
kevin.oneil@trma.com
Suncor Energy
Dianne Humphries
403-269-8728
dhumphries@suncor.com
WinterGardens Energy Recovery Systems L.P.
Myron Sparklingeyes
780-447-3013
wintergardens@shaw.ca
Unable to Attend but Request Documentation:
Husky Oil
Dave Kay
306-825-1515
DAVE.KAY@huskyenergy.ca
Saskatchewan Industry and Resources
Ray Chan
306-787-2993
rchan@ir.gov.sk.ca
Last Modified: 2002-12-17 |
|
|