This
report documents the results of the first part of a research project
jointly funded by Noranda Inc. and the Mine Environment Neutral
Drainage (MEND) program. The second part is covered in a separate
report entitled Hydrology and Solute Transport in Oxidised Waste
Rock from Stratmat Site, N.B., published concurrently with this
report (MEND 2.36.2b). The overall objective of the project was
to understand the geochemical and hydrological interactions between
the partially oxidised waste rock and water and to improve our capabilities
and techniques in the prediction of acidic drainage from waste rock
piles.
Partially
oxidised waste rock was sampled from the Stratmat pile at Heath
Steele Division of Noranda Inc. by grabbing, trenching, and bulk
excavation techniques. The samples were physically and geochemically
characterised in the laboratory whereas the bulk density was measured
in the field. The trenched samples were used in column dissolution
tests in which 25-kg composite sub-samples were subjected to repeated
washing with water to observe the water quality evolution over time.
The resulting data were used to predict water quality for a hypothetical
scenario where the waste rock were backfilled in the Stratmat pit.
In addition, water quality profiles were measured in the Stratmat
pit.
Results
of the column dissolution tests suggest the following mass balance
for the Stratmat pile: Approximately 7% of the original sulphide
sulphur has been oxidised since deposition, releasing a total acidity
of 11 800 t CaCO3 equivalent, of which 56% has been neutralised
in situ. Currently, the acidity inventory is approximately 5200
t CaCO3 equivalent whereas the inventory of soluble zinc
is about 1660 t. The mass balance appears to support preferential
oxidation of sphalerite over pyrite.
The
column dissolution experiments further indicate that dumping the
waste rock into the flooded Stratmat pit will cause significant
release of stored metals and sulphate. The long-term pore water
quality in the absence of ground water movement is predicted as
follows: pH 3.32, acidity 12 500 mg CaCO3/L, SO42-
19 500 mg/L, Zn 4500 mg/L, Cu 180 mg/L and Pb 2.4 mg/L. In the presence
of uncontaminated ground water movement, the water quality would
gradually improve as the initial pore water is displaced or diluted.
It would take nine pore volumes of flushing to reduce the concentrations
of most metals (except Pb) to below 0.1 mg/L. For Pb, this would
take many more pore volumes.
Geochemical
modelling suggests various concentration control mechanisms. Concentrations
of Pb and Fe in the pore water are likely controlled by equilibria
of the leachate solution with anglesite and ferric hydroxide, respectively.
On the other hand, concentrations of SO4, Zn, Ca, Mg,
Mn, and Al in the pore water seem to be limited in the short term
by dissolution/diffusion rate controls. The presence of gypsum is
found to inhibit the dissolution of anglesite. As a result the anglesite
stored in the waste rock would not dissolve appreciably until gypsum
storage is exhausted by dissolution. This implies that decommissioning
of the waste rock by a backfilling-flushing-treatment process would
last a long time before the pore water in the backfilled waste rock
becomes acceptable for discharge to the receiving groundwater.