![Innovative Financing Case Study - Cover Page](/web/20061104111008im_/http://www.oee.nrcan.gc.ca/publications/infosource/pub/cipec/images/dupont_images/cover.jpg) |
INNOVATIVE FINANCING
CASE STUDY
Innovative Financing Means Energy Savings: Energy Performance Contracting
at DuPont Canada
|
The Company
DuPont Canada Inc. is a science company with six manufacturing sites –
five in Ontario and one in Quebec – which produce a broad range of products
for the manufacturing, automotive, textiles and food industries. Among the company's
core values are safety; concern and care for people; protection of the environment;
and personal and corporate integrity.
DuPont Canada's commitment to environmental protection is exemplified in part
through a company-wide policy of good energy management.
"The raw materials we use in making most of our products are derived from
crude oil, so finding ways to reduce energy use has been a company policy for
over 25 years," explains Peter Chantraine, Manager of Energy and Environmental
Affairs at DuPont Canada in Kingston, Ontario, and chair of the company's Manufacturing
Energy Management Team. "It goes back to the oil crisis in the 1970s, when
there was fear about crude oil shortages. Then rising energy costs became an
issue. Since the mid-1990s, climate change has been one of the main corporate
drivers for conserving energy."
Energy consumption by Canada's manufacturing sector is a major source of carbon
dioxide and other greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are contributing to climate
change. Companies like DuPont Canada are voluntarily taking steps to help Canada
achieve its target under the Kyoto Protocol of reducing GHG emissions to six
percent below 1990 levels by the period between 2008 and 2012.
![Photo](/web/20061104111008im_/http://www.oee.nrcan.gc.ca/publications/infosource/pub/cipec/images/dupont_images/photo1.jpg) |
Stationary Engineer Paul Loyst at the controls of the Kingston Site Powerhouse.
The newly installed DCS controls will improve energy efficiency by one percent
through the computer optimization of boilers and air compressors.
|
By improving the efficiency of their operations, these companies are also cutting
costs and improving their bottom line.
The Energy Efficiency Challenge
DuPont Canada's commitment to energy efficiency is unmistakable – the
company is an Industrial Energy Innovator, an active member of the Canadian
Industry Program for Energy Conservation (CIPEC), a Gold Level Champion Reporter
with Canada's Climate Change Voluntary Challenge and Registry Inc. (VCR Inc.),
and a winner at Canada's Energy Efficiency Awards, hosted by Natural Resources
Canada's Office of Energy Efficiency. But there can be challenges to putting
that commitment into practice.
"DuPont Canada is a growth-oriented business focused on expanding its
market share and providing a superior return to investors," says Mr. Chantraine.
"This means capital dollars for energy management projects are scarce.
We want to invest capital in things that will grow the company, not things that
are related to infrastructure."
So when DuPont's Manufacturing Energy Management Team wanted to undertake major
energy efficiency projects, it had to find an innovative way to get the job
done. Mr. Chantraine thought he finally had the answer when he attended a climate
change conference in 1996. One of the topics was energy performance contracting,
as pioneered through the Government of Canada's highly successful Federal Buildings
Initiative.
Energy Performance Contracting
The concept of energy performance contracting is simple – an energy service
company (ESCo) audits a company's facilities and operations to find energy-saving
opportunities. Depending on the results of the audit, the two parties may enter
into a contract that commits the ESCo to undertaking energy efficiency projects
using its own finances. The ESCo recovers its investment over the next few years
from the resulting measured energy savings. In short, energy performance contracting
is a creative way for companies, including those in the industrial sector, to
finance large energy efficiency projects without paying cash up front.
"When I attended the 1996 conference, I heard that the [Federal Buildings
Initiative] process could be used anywhere," recalls Mr. Chantraine. "But
when I tried to implement it at DuPont, I kept running into problems –
undefined barriers that blocked us from moving forward. I finally hooked up
with people in our finance department who told me the problem centred around
keeping the project off the balance sheet."
![Photo](/web/20061104111008im_/http://www.oee.nrcan.gc.ca/publications/infosource/pub/cipec/images/dupont_images/photo2.jpg) |
Spinning Technician Gord Blenderman verifies the operation of
a high-speed winder in a nylon-yarn spinning operation at the
Kingston site. |
Mr. Chantraine learned that if a project is structured correctly, a company
does not have to report the investment as a debt on its balance sheet. This
practice – known as "off-balance sheet" financing – can
be appealing for companies that want to maintain an attractive return on equity,
an important measure of business success.
To remain off-balance sheet, a project must meet certain criteria, including
the following:
- the company makes no capital investment in or capital commitment to the
project;
- the ESCo, not the company whose facilities are being modified, must assume
all risks for the project. The ESCo only receives a financial return in the
form of a specified share of the energy savings, if and when realized;
- the agreement between the ESCo and the company cannot include a commitment
to make fixed monthly payments. Payments vary depending on measured and realized
energy savings;
- the resulting monthly payments made by the company to the ESCo are treated
as expenses (the same as other utility payments) and are not recorded as repayment
of debt or capital investment in assets; and
- no asset can accrue to the company at the end of the contract – the
ESCo must either abandon or remove equipment installed at the company's facilities
at the end of the contract.
In mid-1998, Mr. Chantraine began working with the company's finance department
and the Industrial Energy Innovators Initiative of the Office of Energy Efficiency
(OEE) to define how DuPont could keep major energy efficiency projects off-balance
sheet. At the same time, DuPont began to look for an ESCo partner. From a list
of 12 potential partners, Alliant Energy Integrated Services – Cogenex
(Alliant Cogenex), of Lowell, Massachussetts, emerged as the preferred contractor
(http://alliantenergy.com/docs/groups/public/documents/pub/default.hcsp).
"We worked with Alliant Cogenex for about a year to negotiate a Master
Energy Services Agreement (MESA), which was signed in December 1999," says
Mr. Chantraine. "The MESA had to be accepted by DuPont's finance and taxation
officials in Canada and the U.S., as well as our auditors. The accounting firm
of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, was deeply involved in finding the legal and
financial structure that would keep the project off-balance sheet."
DuPont's Energy Efficiency Projects – The First Wave
Once the MESA was signed, Alliant Cogenex was able to start auditing DuPont's
manufacturing sites, beginning with a pilot project in Ajax, Ontario. Although
the opportunities identified at the Ajax site were too minor to warrant immediate
action, the project did help the two parties build a working relationship. Equally
important, it encouraged DuPont to focus on its largest sites – at Kingston
and Maitland, Ontario – which account for some 90 percent of the company's
manufacturing energy consumption. (Mr. Chantraine says the company will take
another look at the smaller sites in the future.)
". . . the key for energy managers is to figure out what those
barriers are and who in the company needs to be engaged . . . "
– Peter Chantraine
|
In the first wave of projects, Alliant Cogenex is investing $13 million in
new process technology at DuPont's plant in Maitland, with the goal of reducing
the amount of steam energy needed to make adipic acid (a raw material for nylon
polymers and other products) by 30 to 60 percent. The new system will be commissioned
in the fall of 2001.
Five smaller opportunities, requiring an estimated total investment of about
$9.1 million, have been identified at the Kingston site. These projects, which
are expected to be in construction by the end of 2001, include the following:
- installing small commercial boilers to provide heat to an office building
(to replace a decaying underground steam pipe);
- retrofitting lighting;
- installing a new condensing economizer on the main steam boilers to recover
heat from flue gases;
- installing a closed-circuit glycol loop to recover process heat and use
it for space heating in winter; and
- recovering and recycling waste vegetable oils – another raw material
used by the company – rather than incinerating them.
Energy savings from the projects at Maitland and Kingston are expected to be
equivalent to six to eight percent of total energy consumption across the company.
The projects will thus make a major contribution to DuPont Canada's goal of
reducing per-unit energy consumption by 15 percent between 1995 and 2005. And
Mr. Chantraine is quick to point out that the current projects are "only
the start of the opportunities for energy efficiency that exist in the company."
All projects at the Kingston and Maitland sites are based on a 10-year contract
with Alliant Cogenex. The contract has been structured so that a portion of
the monthly energy savings will go to DuPont (thereby providing a positive cash
flow) and a portion to the ESCo. As well, the contract stipulates that DuPont
owns any emissions credits that may arise from the energy efficiency projects.
DuPont can apply the emissions credits to its own VCR Inc. targets or sell them
to other companies.
Projected Energy Savings Through Energy Performance Contracting*
Project |
Approximate
Investment |
Estimated Energy
Savings |
Estimated Emissions
Reductions (tonnes of CO2) |
|
Kingston Site |
Process heat recovery |
$5.1 M |
127 TJ/year |
8 023 |
Waste finish process change |
$0.5 M |
23 TJ/year |
1 162 |
Lighting retrofit completion |
$1.0 M |
2 750 MWh/year |
220 |
New boilers to save steam |
$0.7 M |
33 TJ/year |
1 853 |
Condensing economizer |
$1.8 M |
70 TJ/year |
3 585 |
|
Maitland Site |
Process heat recovery |
$13.0 M |
542 TJ/year |
33 165 |
|
* Energy performance contracts as of September 21, 2001
TJ/year = terajoules per year
MWh/year = megawatt hours per year
Conclusion
As the cost of energy increases and awareness grows about the need for all
sectors of the Canadian economy to take action on climate change, more and more
companies are looking for ways to reduce their energy consumption and improve
their bottom line. While there may be several ways to achieve these goals, innovative
financing techniques can make the difference between whether a project proceeds
or dies in the planning stage.
"The barriers will be different in every company," says Mr. Chantraine.
"I think the key for energy managers is to figure out what those barriers
are and who in the company needs to be engaged in finding a solution. You need
to talk to people in your legal department, in finance and taxation, and in
operations and plant maintenance."
For information on DuPont Canada's energy management strategy, contact the
following:
Peter Chantraine
Manager of Energy and Environmental Affairs
DuPont Canada
455 Front Road
PO Box 2100
Kingston ON K7L 4Z6
Tel.: (613) 548-5025
Fax: (613) 548-5356
E-mail: peter.chantraine@can.dupont.com
For information on the Industrial Energy Innovators Initiative, contact
the following:
Industrial Energy Innovators Initiative
Office of Energy Efficiency
Natural Resources Canada
580 Booth Street, 18th Floor
Ottawa ON K1A 0E4
Tel.: (613) 995-6839
Fax: (613) 947-4121
Web site: http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/cipec
E-mail: info.ind@nrcan.gc.ca
Leading Canadians to Energy Efficiency at Home, at Work and on the Road
The Office of Energy Efficiency of Natural Resources Canada strengthens and
expands Canada's commitment
to energy efficiency in order to help address the challenge of climate change.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2001
Catalogue number: M27-01-1653E
(Aussi disponible en français)
|