Law Commission of Canada Canada
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Home Reading Room News Room Site Map Links
What's New
About Us
Research Contract Opportunities
Upcoming Events
President's Corner
Research Projects
Contests, Competitions and Partnerships
Departmental Reports
Resources
Printable VersionPrintable VersionEmail This PageEmail This Page

Home About Us Reports Research Paper 1999 Why is it so difficult to combat elder abuse

About Us

Reports

Research Paper

Older Adults' Personal Relationships


Final Report


Why is it so difficult to combat elder abuse and, in particular, financial exploitation of the elderly?

by

Donald Poirier, M.A (Psy.), LL.B., LL.M., LL.D.
and
Norma Poirier, B.Sc.N., M.A.(Ed.), M.N., Ph.D.
Professors at the University of Moncton
Moncton, N.B., E1A 3E9
tel: (506) 863-2128
fax: (506) 858-4534
E-mail: Poiriedo@umoncton.ca



Submitted to the Law Commission of Canada


July 17, 1999



This paper was prepared for the Law Commission of Canada under the title Pourquoi est-il si difficile de lutter contre la violence envers les aînés et en particulier contre l'exploitation économique dont ils sont victimes? The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission. The accuracy of the information contained in the paper is the sole responsibility of the authors.


Ce document est également disponible en français sous le titre Pourquoi est-il si difficile de lutter contre la violence envers les aînés et en particulier contre l'exploitation économique dont ils sont victimes?



Table of Contents


BRIEF BIOGRAPHIES OF THE AUTHORS

PART I:THE PREVALENCE OF ELDER ABUSE
1.Introduction
2.Origin of the Notion of Elder Abuse
2.1Knowledge of the problem at the time of the adoption of elder protection laws: scarcity of data
2.2Canadian data on elder abuse at the time of the adoption of elder protection laws
3.The Remedy: the Adoption of Laws to Protect the Elderly and Abused Adults
4.The Prevalence of Elder Abuse
4.1Types of abuse
4.2Problems inherent to studies of elder abuse
4.3The overall prevalance rates of elder abuse
4.3.1Surveys of professionals
4.3.2Prevalence studies based on the files of service agencies
4.3.3Studies using a random sample
5.Physical and Sexual Assault
5.1Definitions
5.2Prevalence rates
5.3Abusers and victims
6.Psychological Abuse
6.1Definitions
6.2Prevalence rates
6.3Abusers and victims
7.The Prevalence of Neglect
7.1Definitions
7.2Prevalence rates
7.3Abusers and victims
8.The Prevalence of Loss of Rights
8.1Definitions
8.2Prevalence rates
8.3Abusers and victims
9.The Prevalence of Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
9.1Definitions
9.2Prevalence rates
9.3Abusers and victims
10.Conclusion
PART II:EVALUATION OF THE ADEQUACY AND EFFICACY OF CANADIAN LAW IN ADDRESSING ELDER ABUSE
1.Introduction
2.Methodology
2.1Determining the state of the law
2.2Evaluating the adequacy of the law
2.3Evaluating the efficacy of the law
3.The Relevant Law in effect in Canada, and in the Atlantic provinces in particular
3.1The relevant provisions of the Criminal Code
3.1.1Physical and sexual abuse
3.1.2Chronic psychological abuse
3.1.3Neglect
3.1.4Loss of rights
3.2The relevant provisions of Canadian common law and Quebec civil law
3.2.1Physical and sexual abuse
3.2.2Chronic psychological abuse
3.2.3Neglect
3.2.4Loss of rights
3.3The relevant provisions of laws governing guardianship of the elderly
3.3.1The laws governing guardianship
3.3.2The parens patriae jurisdiction of the Superior Court
3.3.3The laws protecting the mentally ill
3.4The relevant provisions of the laws governing protection of the elderly and abused and/or neglected adults
4.Evaluation of the adequacy and efficacy of the law governing protection of the elderly from abuse
4.1Criteria for evaluating each of the 5 forms of elder abuse
4.2Evaluation of the adequacy and efficacy of the various elements of Canadian law governing physical and sexual assault and chronic psychological abuse
4.2.1The adequacy of the law
4.2.2The efficacy of the law
4.3Evaluation of the adequacy and efficacy of the various elements of Canadian law governing protection of the elderly from neglect
4.3.1The adequacy of the law
4.3.2The efficacy of the law
4.4Evaluation of the adequacy and efficacy of the various elements of Canadian law governing protection of the rights of the elderly
4.4.1The adequacy of the law
4.4.2The efficacy of the law
5.Conclusion
PART III:THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK TO EXPLAIN WHY IT IS SO DIFFICULT TO COMBAT FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION OF THE ELDERLY
1.Introduction
2.Reasons for the ineffectiveness of the law in protecting the elderly
2.1Reasons related to the inadequacy and ineffectiveness of traditional law
2.1.1Mandatory reporting
2.1.2Considerable powers granted to social workers
2.2Institutional reasons
2.2.1Systemic discrimination: ageism
2.2.2Police
2.2.3Lack of resources
2.3Reasons related to family values
2.3.1To avoid hurting their children
2.3.2Shame and guilt
2.3.3Quality of life
2.3.4Leave something to the children
3.Methodology
4.Results
4.1The state of Canadian law with regard to financial exploitation of the elderly
4.1.1The relevant provisions of the Criminal Code
4.1.2The relevant provisions of Canadian common law and Quebec civil law
4.1.3The relevant provisions of the laws governing guardianship of the elderly
4.1.4The relevant provisions of the laws governing protection of the elderly and abused and/or neglected adults
4.2Evaluation of the adequacy and efficacy of the law in protecting the elderly from financial exploitation
4.2.1The inadequacy of elements of Canadian law
4.2.1.1The provisions of the Criminal Code
4.2.1.2The provisions of common law and the Civil Code of Québec
4.2.1.3The laws governing guardianship and trusteeship
4.2.1.4Special legislation to protect the elderly
4.2.2The ineffectiveness of the elements of Canadian law
4.2.2.1The efficacy of criminal law
4.2.2.2The efficacy of Canadian common law and Quebec civil law
4.2.2.3The efficacy of the laws governing guardianship and of mental health laws
4.2.2.4The efficacy of laws to protect the elderly
5.A Conceptual Framework to Explain the Phenomenon: Normative Pluralism
5.1Normative pluralism in interpersonal relationships
5.2The normative pluralism of social structures
5.2.1Boaventura de Soussa Santos' cartography of social systems
5.2.2Luhmann's social systems
5.2.3Interaction between the various social systems: the rationality specific to each
5.3The application of normative pluralism to the problem of protection of the elderly from financial exploitation by their descendants
5.3.1The State legal system
5.3.2The professional social system
5.3.3The familial social system
5.3.4Interaction between the various social systems to protect the elderly from financial exploitation
6.Recommendations: How to Effect Change in the Protection of the Elderly from Financial Exploitation

GENERAL CONCLUSION
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
LIST OF LEGISLATIVE SOURCES
LIST OF CASES

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1Evaluation of the adequacy and efficacy of Canadian law in protecting the elderly from physical and psychological abuse
Table 2Categorization of cases referred to Nova Scotia's Social Services from 1986 to 1995
Table 3Evaluation of the adequacy and efficacy of Canadian law in protecting the elderly from neglect
Table 4Evaluation of the adequacy and efficacy of Canadian law in protecting the elderly from loss of their rights
Table 5Comparative table of the powers granted to the police under the Criminal Code and those granted to social workers under New Brunswick's Family Services Act
Table 6Evaluation of the adequacy and efficacy of Canadian law in protecting the elderly from financial exploitation


What's New | About Us | Research Contract Opportunities | Upcoming Events | President's Corner | Research Projects | Contests, Competitions and Partnerships | Departmental Reports | Resources