Why Communicate?
![,](/web/20061109011126im_/http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/images/line450x1.gif)
Part of a Healthy Environment for R&D;
Why should you communicate with the public? As a scientist or engineer,
you are in a privileged position to see how advanced knowledge benefits
Canadians by:
- maintaining and enhancing our standard of living
- improving our quality of life
- contributing to humankind's understanding of the world around us.
Reporting to the "Shareholders"
The vast majority of Canadians have no idea how university researchers
use their tax dollars. They count on the research community to spend
their dollars wisely. However, taxpayers are increasingly demanding
accountability from government and publicly funded institutions. Communications
is one way researchers can demonstrate accountability. Just as corporations
issue annual reports to shareholders, the science and engineering research
community has a responsibility to inform society about how it is spending
public money.
Contribute to Society's Understanding of Science
Canada's future prosperity will depend on our ability to foster a
scientifically-literate population and workforce. The country will continue
to need scientists and engineers. But we will also require scientifically
trained managers and a workforce that can adapt to rapid technological
change. Public understanding of scientific and technical issues will
also be critical in solving many difficult problems facing society.
Researchers are in an excellent position to improve public awareness
of science-related issues and to inspire young people with an interest
in science and engineering.
Build Links With Other Sectors
Communications may also bring you and your research interests to the
attention of prospective partners in other sectors. Closer links among
universities, industry and government labs translates into more opportunities
for researchers, better job prospects for graduates, and a stronger
and more competitive industrial sector.
Improve Credibility of Engineering and Science
People today are concerned about the social consequences of science
and technology - especially environmental impacts. Many want unqualified
assurances of the benefits of new technology. These are just the sort
of assurances reputable scientists are unable to give. At the same time,
the public is applying higher standards of behaviour to individuals
in positions of authority. Engineers and scientists are not exempt.
People hear that many scientists have conflicts of interest and want
to know how this affects their scientific opinions.
Like it or not, scientists and the scientific enterprise are being
challenged. All engineers and scientists have a responsibility to discuss
what they do and why it is important to society.
Build Acceptance for Science
Many researchers are working on scientific or technological problems
- genetics and reproductive issues, for example - that impose social
and ethical choices on society. Other scientists and engineers are involved
in enterprises that may result in fundamental and wide-reaching changes
that will disrupt many people's lives.
Change is part of modern life and criticism is an inevitable outcome
of change. We need to begin now to build acceptance and support for
research activities to withstand criticism in the future.
Secure Support for Future Funding
Securing funding for research is an annual battle. Political leaders
are besieged by competing interests. Governments are living on borrowed
money and find it increasingly difficult to make investments in our
economic and social well-being, especially when the benefits are seen
to be far off. Consistent support from ordinary Canadians and their
elected representatives is essential to the success of the research
enterprise.
Contents | Next
|