Skip to common menu bar. 
      (access key: m)Skip to side navigation links. 
      (access key: x)Skip to content. 
      (access key: z)
Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Today's
Releases
File, Register
and Epass
Decisions, Notices and
Orders
Home
CISC
  Industries at
a Glance
Reference
Centre
Canadian
Content
Public
Proceedings
Statutes &
Regulations
CRTC Home  
   

Viewing Tools:
Special software needed to read non-HTML documents

Speech

Notes for an address

by Andrée Wylie

Vice-Chairperson, Broadcasting
Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission

to the Western Association of Broadcasters Annual Conference

Kananaskis, Alberta

June 7th, 2003

(CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY)


Introduction

Thank you, Dennis.

Good morning, everyone.

It is a pleasure to join you for breakfast in these glorious surroundings. I can think of few places in Canada that match the beauty and serenity of Kananaskis, and I would not be surprised if it were the WAB’s annual trips here that feed your creativity.

Certainly, this is an inspiring place in which to contemplate the theme of this year’s conference: Broadcasting – The Next Generation.

The panel that will discuss that topic later this morning is an impressive one... featuring some of the brightest minds in your industry... and I am sure that what comes out of that discussion will renew your creativity and your resolve to participate fully in the next generation of Canadian broadcasting.

You have asked me to talk to you, on behalf of the Commission, about (1) how the CRTC views the challenges and opportunities that will face broadcasters as they consider how to serve their audiences in the future and (2) what role the CRTC could play in helping you to meet them. Not an easy subject this early in the morning and in such a majestic setting that calls for inspired musings, not regulatory ones. But, I know none of you would have the courage to fall asleep when your regulator speaks.

Goals for the Future

Although the CRTC has to keep an eye on its regulatory objectives, it is intent on putting in place the regulatory environment that will allow you to provide the technologies and services that Canadian consumers will want in the next generation of broadcasting.

Not since the advent of television as a viable commercial medium have there been as many important choices to make, as many changes to manage, and so many options to weigh for the future of broadcasting.

Let me address a few of them.

The Commission relies heavily on input from all of its stakeholders... from informal sessions like this weekend’s to more formal hearings … to hone its understanding of what is happening “out there” and how best to ensure that it helps in harnessing changes to the advantage of the Canadian broadcasting system. That is why I am grateful for your invitation.

Your views and your experience are critical to the Commission.

While we might approach issues from different directions, we share common goals, including a healthy, profitable, broadcasting industry, able to deliver high quality, popular Canadian programming that viewers and listeners want to see and hear.

Television

Last year, at this venue, the Commission’s Chair, Charles Dalfen, told you how committed he was to the development and support of truly Canadian, original television programming.

We have since, in conjunction with Telefilm Canada, commissioned a report from veteran TV executive Trina McQueen to explore how the industry can work toward putting more Canadian drama on Canadian television.

As you know, Ms. McQueen submitted her report on May 23rd, and I hope that those of you in television have had a chance to read it.

A number of her recommendations are addressed to the CRTC, and we are reviewing them with great interest before pondering, with your participation, any next steps.

Of course, the provision of high quality dramatic programming that reflects the unique character and voices of Canadians – programming that tells our stories – is just one challenge facing the Canadian television industry.

Another is how to keep the balance between local, regional and national television programming, as new technologies are forcing us to re-examine that balance and develop new ways of keeping it… in balance.

Today, direct-to-home services beam hundreds of channels down to viewers’ satellite dishes, offering a wide range of programming from local, national and international sources.

This presents a problem for local broadcasters, particularly in small market areas. To them, DTH represents out-of-market competition that can siphon off local viewership and deny them the protection of their programming rights, their very valuable property in their local markets. We are currently examining how to alleviate this problem.

Broadcasters are also faced with another concern... and that is the serious problem of signal theft.

Far from being a “victimless crime”, as some view it, satellite signal theft – along with the unauthorized use of cable access – has extremely detrimental effects on the Canadian broadcasting system... depriving distributors, television broadcasters, producers and program rights holders of hundreds of millions of dollars in revenues each year.

If left unchecked, this practice will pose a serious threat to the financial health and future of the Canadian broadcasting system, and in turn to the achievement of the objectives of the Broadcasting Act. We know how your industry has recently deployed tremendous energy to stem this illegal flow of viewing from which you cannot gain your just rewards.

The RCMP has made some significant progress in prosecuting the groups who import illegal equipment or distribute software that defeats security systems. There is also an important role that broadcasters can continue to play, at the community level, by spreading the word about the real cost of this so-called “free programming”.

Cable and satellite delivery have meant greater choice than ever before for consumers of specialized programming, but it has also meant that general interest broadcasters have been forced to compete for shrinking returns, even from legal viewing.

In large part as a result, local music, variety, drama and sports coverage have all declined. Only local news and information seem to have continued to thrive.

But, as has been the case throughout the history of Canadian broadcasting, broadcasters will find new ways to compete effectively and to differentiate themselves in their markets. I, for one, cannot believe that you will not.

And, of course, the regulatory framework must provide optimum flexibility for broadcasters to use emerging technologies and renewed marketing strategies.

One example is the Commission’s flexible approach to the potential of digital television which stands to revolutionize the industry like nothing since the coming of colour TV in the 1960s.

DTV technology brings with it some challenges... technical challenges... marketing challenges... financial challenges… and, for the Commission, regulatory challenges.

To be sure, there are public policy issues to be managed in this transition. They need to be recognized as such but resolved in a time frame and manner that are appropriate for us as Canadians.

Therefore, in its published framework for the introduction of over-the-air DTV, the Commission did not impose a timetable for the transition from analogue to digital, although it encouraged broadcasters to move quickly to take advantage of the bandwidth made available.

In its licensing framework, the Commission sought to find an appropriate balance between easing the transition for broadcasters and consumers, and providing incentives for early adoption, all the while keeping its eye on its legislative mandate.

The continuation of the same percentage of Canadian content during the transition will mean that Canadian viewers continue to have their own stories, concerns and lifestyles reflected in the digital programming that is available to them.

However, we have announced our pre-disposition to licensing new and innovative multicast services, on a case-by-case basis, over those that duplicate existing over-the-air, pay or specialty services. We have also allowed broadcasters to devote to new innovative programming a number of hours a week broadcast on the DTV duplication of an analog transmitter.

Together, we are all entering a time of significant change in television broadcasting, and the Commission will be monitoring developments during this period, and moving to adjust the system, where possible and when needed, and with your advice and help.

Radio

Needless to say, television is not unique in facing radical technological evolution and new challenges.

Although the Commission embraced the early licensing of digital audio broadcasting --DAB-- continues to be in its early stages and the world’s largest radio market to our south has yet to settle on its future course, probably slowing the penetration of DAB in Canada.

That said, the Commission remains hopeful that Canadians will eventually turn to the digital radio transmissions already available in most large Canadian cities.

The Commission has also recently granted a licence for Canada’s first standalone digital radio station to serve the South Asian community in Toronto.

In granting this licence in March, the Commission noted the financial risks associated with being a digital pioneer, but it was satisfied that the applicant was willing and able to assume those risks in the market concerned.

Again, this reflects the Commission’s overarching belief that the marketplace must determine the pace of technological evolution, matched by the desire of entrepreneurs to serve that marketplace with a business case that makes sense for them.

Here in the West, and particularly for broadcasters who may serve large rural areas, the business case may be different.

What we know is that radio continues to be a vital link that binds Canadians together – both within their immediate community and across the breadth of the entire country.

Not surprisingly, both on a local and regional basis, commercial radio is doing very well.

As the Commission stated in March, when it released the five-year financials of the industry, there has been a steady increase in both revenues and spending for Canadian radio stations since 1998.

Here in the West, the picture is particularly rosy, with new stations in Manitoba and Saskatchewan and applications pending for Edmonton and Red Deer.

The 15 new stations we have licensed across the country in the past year represent quite a diversity, from CanWest Global’s first venture into the market with their all-jazz station in their home base of Winnipeg, to stations that are serving the needs of ethnic communities.

Far beyond its own success, radio in Canada also has cause to celebrate the significant role it has played in helping this country become the second largest exporter of musical talent in the world.

From Céline Dion to Avril Lavigne, from Bryan Adams to Nickelback... Canada has taken on the world and established itself as a musical force to be reckoned with, helped in no small part by radio and, at the risk of being denied a second cup of coffee, in no small measure by the Commission’s CanCon requirements.

Combined with the commitment that Canada’s private radio broadcasters have made, CanCon has worked to seed a fertile talent pool and provide a strong domestic market for new talent and established stars.

As I am sure you are aware, the Commission will begin reviewing its Commercial Radio Policy later this year, and while it's too early for me to provide details, it is safe to assume that issues such as CanCon and ownership structure will be included in this review.

The CRTC Chair is also on record as saying recently that it would be worthwhile to look at the role of the so-called “independent” radio operations in the system. Together, these independents hold 54% of Canada’s radio licences, while six broadcasters hold the rest.

What has been the impact of greater consolidation in that context?

If radio broadcasters centralize some of their operations, do local listeners lose, or does this allow for higher quality service in smaller communities?

What is the role of the independents in the Canadian broadcasting system... now and in the future?

Given the importance we attach to reflecting local communities, these questions might well play an important part in the forthcoming review.

The Senator

On the topic of independent broadcasters and the importance of reflecting local markets, I am honoured to have the opportunity to recognize the contribution of one of the WAB’s senior radio members.

They call Elmer Hildebrandt “The Senator”, but it’s as an ambassador for Canada’s strong, independent, community-based radio sector that Elmer has made his mark. He is not ready for the Senate yet. We need his continued participation in the radio industry.

Wisely, the WAB chose to recognize Elmer twice as Broadcaster of the Year, and name him Broadcaster of the Decade in 1994. Elmer has also won well-deserved accolades from the national broadcasting community, winning the CAB’s Gold Ribbon in 1991 and being inducted into the CAB Broadcast Hall of Fame in 1996.

Tellingly, The Senator is one of those selected to debate the future of Canadian broadcasting at your session later this morning.

Given his mastery of the business – from copywriter at Altona’s CFAM to President and CEO of Golden West Broadcasting – and his devotion to the local audience, you would be hard-pressed to find wiser counsel.

Elmer is also well known for asking pointed questions at the end of speeches by Commission representatives, so let me say a few words in conclusion before Elmer raises his hand.

Conclusion

One thing Elmer’s 45 years of success in this business shows us is the importance of keeping sight of the past as we move into the future.

It is indeed essential to remember, as you examine ways of adopting new technologies, finding new methods of reaching audiences and remaining viable, that maintaining the link with your viewers and listeners has been a key ingredient of your success.

For its part, the CRTC is committed to establishing a framework that will enable Canada’s broadcasters to face the challenges of the next generation of broadcasting in a way that meets their needs and the needs of their audiences.

By working together, we can improve the odds so that everyone wins... your industry, artists and producers, your audiences, and Canadian culture writ large… not only Elmer.

Thank you.

- 30 -

Media Relations:
   MediaRelations@crtc.gc.ca, Tel: (819) 997-9403,
   Fax: (819) 997-4245

General Inquiries:
   Tel: (819) 997-0313, TDD: (819) 994-0423, Fax: (819) 994-0218
   Toll-free # 1-877-249-CRTC (2782), eMail: info@crtc.gc.ca
   TDD - Toll-free # 1-877-909-2782

This document is available in alternative format upon request.

Date Modified: 2003-09-02

 
top
 

Comments about our site


Français | Contact Us | Help | Search | Canada Site

Today's Releases | File, Register and Epass | Decisions, Notices & Orders | Home | CISC | Industries at a Glance | Reference Centre | Canadian Content | Public Proceedings| Statutes & Regulations

1-877-249-CRTC (2782) Important Notices