Skip to common menu bar. 
      (access key: m)Skip to side navigation links. 
      (access key: x)Skip to content. 
      (access key: z)
Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Today's
Releases
File, Register
and Epass
Decisions, Notices and
Orders
Home
CISC
  Industries at
a Glance
Reference
Centre
Canadian
Content
Public
Proceedings
Statutes &
Regulations
CRTC Home  
   

Viewing Tools:
Special software needed to read non-HTML documents

Speech

Workshop on “Good regulatory governance in the face of globalization”

Notes for an address

by Jean-Marc Demers

Commissioner, Canadian Radio-television
and Telecommunications Commission

at the First Annual Meeting of the Francophone Telecommunications Regulation Network

Bamako, Mali

October 28th, 2003

(CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY)


Introduction

Hello everyone! It is an honour to have been invited to coordinate this workshop featuring international experts.

First allow me to introduce them to you. We have:

Mr. Ibrahima Sanou, Chief of the UIT African Regional Office.

Mr. Yann Burtin, TIC Branch, World Bank.

Mr. Papa Lamine Sylla of the Multinational Centre for Higher Studies in Telecommunications in Dakar.

This workshop will be dealing with the theme of the First Annual Meeting of the Francophone Telecommunications Regulation Network, which is “Good regulatory governance in the face of globalization”. Given the quality of the participants at this workshop, I am sure that it will prove highly informative and interesting for all of you.

But first, let me get things warmed up a little by offering you the Canadian point of view on good governance and its relationship to telecommunications regulation in the context of growing globalization.

Good governance in Canada

The term “governance” can be defined as the manner in which the government manages a country’s social and economic resources. In Canada, good governance is notably the exercise of power by the various levels of government, with a view to efficiency, honesty, fairness, transparency and responsibility. Essentially, it can be summed up as the good management of public affairs, by means of rules and principles, in collaboration with businesses and the Canadian people.

We are convinced that sound governance empowers people and strengthens their government. It brings stability that promotes the creation of jobs and businesses, and therefore, economic growth. It supports the efficient delivery of social programs and improvements in the general health of communities. For us, sound governance constitutes the cornerstone of vibrant communities.

As recently stated by the President of the Treasury Board of Canada, the Honourable Lucienne Robillard, “We are developing an overall strategy of government services that are clearly geared toward citizens and that offer them a global vision of the Canadian government. By the end of this calendar year, we will be in a position to make that vision a reality that is based on what Canadians and businesses tell us, what technology allows us to do, and on new approaches for managing information and information systems.”

In Canada, governance is closely linked with certain conditions, notably:

  • Accountability: those who wield authority report to the people, for example, on the use of public resources, on their compliance with existing laws, on their values and on how they administrate.
  • Cooperation and the sharing of certain responsibilities by different levels of government and society at large.
  • The pooling of expertise and knowledge: partnership should be based on common projects and shared rules.
  • And finally, the government’s role as catalyst in supporting the actions of the various stakeholders.

Ethics and good governance

And there is, of course, the question of ethics, In Canada, all public office holders must act with honesty and meet high ethical standards in order to maintain and increase the public’s confidence in the government’s integrity, objectivity and impartiality. They must carry out their official duties and organize their personal affairs so that they are above reproach and can withstand intense public scrutiny. Furthermore, they most avoid real, potential or apparent conflicts of interest. The public interest must always take precedence in cases where office holders’ interests conflict with their official duties.

Last month, the President of the Treasury Board of Canada announced a new spending policy for the various federal departments and agencies. The measures that have been adopted are the result of consultations, notably with the Canadian public. They will serve to increase fairness and accountability, improve government communications and strengthen the management of public resources.

It is interesting to note that in most countries, governments and businesses take ethics seriously. Governments in particular can see the extent to which corruption can erode their economies and harm their societies. In order to put an end to corruption, they take specific actions within the framework of their more general efforts to improve governance. The evolution of the international climate has indeed greatly assisted in effecting this turnaround.

We are gradually seeing the importance of strong leadership in a number of countries. I am convinced that the commitment to good governance will become more and more widespread in the coming years.

The CRTC and good regulatory governance

It seems clear that an independent, accessible and impartial legal and judicial system is the key to honest and fair management. In Canada, an independent agency like the CRTC truly symbolizes that concept. It is directly financed by contributions from the companies it regulates, based on very strict and well-established criteria. Its mandate is clearly defined in the two Acts that govern it. Its role is facilitated by the absence of direct financial participation on the part of the Canadian government in the ownership of telecommunications companies.

The CRTC makes its decisions impartially, depending largely on the Acts and regulations that govern it. Interested parties are encouraged to take part in proceedings and to inform the Commission of their concerns. For example, the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure provide for the reimbursement of expenses incurred by those who participate in CRTC proceedings. In order to be reimbursed, interveners must act for themselves or on behalf of a group of subscribers that will receive a benefit or suffer a detriment as a result of the order or decision. Interveners must also participate in proceedings in a responsible way and contribute to a better understanding of the issues by the Commission. The CRTC taxes the company involved for the amount of the costs allowed.

Every year, pursuant to an order-in-council, the CRTC reports to the government on the state of competition in telecommunications markets, as well as the deployment and accessibility of telecommunications infrastructure and advanced services. This report is made public and may be consulted by telecommunications companies, the general public or any other interested party. You had a preview of the 2003 edition yesterday as some of the data I provided in my speech came from that report, which is not yet final. It will be released at the end of November, and you will be able to consult it on our Web site.

An efficient regulatory system is an important tool that helps the government to attain its public policy objectives. In terms of regulation, the CRTC follows the directives established by Parliament in the Telecommunications Act. Among other things, it should “foster increased reliance on market forces for the provision of telecommunications services and (to) ensure that regulation, where required, is efficient and effective…”

In the telecommunications sector, the CRTC has declined to regulate, in whole or in part, based on the level of competition in the markets. We believe that ultimately, the most durable competition would be what we call competition based on infrastructure. This means that providers of competing telecommunications services use their own equipment and infrastructure to provide their services rather than depending on those of other companies. We believe that in the long term, this infrastructure-based competition will be the best way to achieve the objectives established by Parliament in the Telecommunications Act.

While infrastructure-based competition is our ultimate goal, a period of transition toward this model is necessary. We are therefore currently adopting a hybrid approach that allows new entrants to use the required infrastructure and equipment belonging to incumbent telephone companies (former monopolies), in return for regulated fees. This might involve, for example, the wires that connect the user from the head office of a telephone company.

We still have a long way to go before meeting our objective of facilitating infrastructure-based competition. Competition, particularly in local markets, is certainly not evolving as quickly as we would have liked.

As the telecommunications regulator, the CRTC assumes responsibility for improving this situation. Our recent decisions have been aimed at eliminating obstacles and thereby promoting competition. And we will continue moving in that direction.

I would like to quote to you from an article published last June by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) dealing with this subject:

“The principal challenge for the governments of OECD countries is to ensure that telecommunications markets remain open, so that competition in the sector allows for new innovations. Ensuring the liberalization of local access markets in particular and opening them to competition would be a great step forward.”

Good governance, a cornerstone of globalization

At the same time, I envisage governance in the face of globalization as the association of different governments and agencies for purposes of commercial exchanges and the resolution of collective problems. This requires the cooperation of the various players.

To differing degrees and over various times in our history, the concept of good governance has been considered and adopted by numerous private and public organizations. The globalization of markets has increased the requirements of good governance. Certain trade agreements, particularly those of the World Trade Organization dealing with basic telecommunications services or the regional agreements, contain articles that frame or guide the practices of telecommunications regulators. Good governance enables the public, companies, shareholders, partners, and all the players in an industrial sector to learn about developments, as well as to better understand the actions of an organization and interact with it.

We are all confronted with the challenge of globalization, an irreversible and planetary process that is affecting our daily lives. It clearly offers economic benefits to countries and individuals. Some people are still asking themselves if globalization doesn’t threaten to undermine our cultures, our societies, our environments, and increase income disparities. In Canada, the challenge involves building a society inspired by “globalization with a human face”, able to protect and enrich multicultural diversity, linguistic duality, and the quality of life.

Globalization is not the source of all evil. Nor, however, is it a panacea that automatically improves the existence of whoever opens their borders to monetary and commercial exchanges. Globalization must be balanced with a development process.

Canada believes that globalization will be what we make it. The choice belongs to us. Essentially, everything depends on how we decide to govern ourselves as an international community. There would appear to be unanimity on the final objectives – making globalization work and finding global solutions to global and national problems. On the other hand, there is not unanimity on how best to achieve those objectives.

Some argue for continuing to intervene on a case by case basis and dealing with problems as they arise. Canada advocates instead the development of new structures and new mechanisms that will allow the global economy to better serve the interests of the world’s citizens – all the world’s citizens. We think that we have to depend on laws, structures and approaches that form a more coordinated framework and that will be just as effective.

Positive results

Before I conclude, allow me to share you with a few elements from a report that the OECD published a year ago dealing with the Canadian telecommunications sector:

  • Among OECD countries, Canada recorded one of the best performances in the telecommunications sector.
  • The Canadian regulatory system is one of the most transparent in the world, and its regulatory culture is innovative and future-oriented.
  • Finally, competition has meant lower prices, and a real choice in service providers, as well as the rapid development of access to high-speed Internet.

It goes without saying that we are very proud of this recognition of the Canadian telecommunications industry’s results, even though we still face a number of challenges. But the development and the daily practice of sound regulatory governance will certainly help us achieve these results.

Conclusion

In closing, I would like to emphasize that governance is more than a set of procedures or rules, or a revival of corporatism. It is aimed at a new organization of power and collective action. A society has effective governance when power, knowledge and resources are well distributed. It remains an ongoing exercise rather than a static objective. It is a state of mind that requires constant vigilance and commitment.

As for regulation, I believe that it must not only be developed with the participation of citizens and businesses, but also with the cooperation of other national and international authorities, in order to truly reflect our own interests while taking into account our commercial and cultural relations.

In a context of globalization, despite their individual differences, companies and governments can agree on the implementation of certain measures that will improve the situation of a great many components, notably telecommunications.

And therefore, a meeting like this one creates opportunities for pooling ideas, rules, and resources for the benefit of telecommunications throughout the Francophonie.

Thank you! I will now turn things over to the international regulatory experts we have invited to this workshop.

- 30 -

Media Relations:
   MediaRelations@crtc.gc.ca, Tel: (819) 997-9403, Fax: (819) 997-4245

General Inquiries:
   Tel: (819) 997-0313, TDD: (819) 994-0423, Fax: (819) 994-0218
   Toll-free # 1-877-249-CRTC (2782), eMail: info@crtc.gc.ca
   TDD - Toll-free # 1-877-909-2782

This document is available in alternative format upon request.

Date Modified: 2004-01-16

 
top
 

Comments about our site


Français | Contact Us | Help | Search | Canada Site

Today's Releases | File, Register and Epass | Decisions, Notices & Orders | Home | CISC | Industries at a Glance | Reference Centre | Canadian Content | Public Proceedings| Statutes & Regulations

1-877-249-CRTC (2782) Important Notices