|
Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2005-218
|
|
Ottawa, 27 May 2005 |
|
Videotron (Regional) Ltd.
Gatineau, Gatineau (Buckingham sector), Thurso and
Montebello, Quebec and Rockland, Ontario |
|
Application 2004-0718-1
Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2005-11
3 February 2005 |
|
Application for relief from sections 17 and 32 of the
Broadcasting Distribution Regulations
|
|
The Commission approves the
application by Videotron (Regional) Ltd. to be relieved of the
requirement to distribute CJMT-TV-2 (OMNI.2) Ottawa as part of the basic
service beginning with the basic band (channels 2 to 13). OMNI.2 will be
distributed on channel 41 as part of the high-penetration tier in analog
mode and on channel 15 as part of the digital basic service in the
Gatineau, Gatineau (Buckingham sector), Thurso, Montebello and Rockland
service areas. |
|
The application
|
1.
|
The Commission received an application by
Videotron (Regional) Ltd. (Videotron), the licensee of the Class 1 cable
broadcasting distribution undertakings (BDUs) serving Gatineau and
Gatineau (Buckingham sector), Quebec, of the Class 2 BDU serving
Rockland, Ontario and of the Class 3 BDUs serving Thurso and Montebello,
Quebec. Videotron requested to be relieved, by condition of licence, of
the requirements set out in sections 17 and 32 of the Broadcasting
Distribution Regulations (the Regulations) that it distribute
CJMT-TV-2 (OMNI.2) Ottawa as part of the basic service of each of these
cable BDUs beginning with the basic band (channels 2 to 13). Instead,
Videotron proposed to distribute OMNI.2 as part of the basic service of
each of these cable BDUs, but on a channel outside the basic band. |
2.
|
Section 17(1) of the Regulations lists, in
order of priority, the television programming services that must be
distributed as part of the basic service of Class 1 and Class 2 BDUs and
section 32(1) lists, in order of priority, the television programming
services that must be distribution as part of the basic service of Class
3 BDUs. Sections 17(2) and 32(2) of the Regulations state that these
services must be distributed on a channel beginning with the basic band. |
|
Intervention
|
3.
|
The Commission received a comment in
connection with this application. In its intervention, Rogers Media Inc.
(Rogers) opposed the distribution of OMNI.2 on channel 59 in analog
mode. It argued that, while the service would be distributed as part of
the basic service, distribution on channel 59 would be well beyond the
discretionary tier of these systems. Rogers noted that if the OMNI.2
signal was distributed on channel 59, it would be subjected to an undue
disadvantage in comparison with other local stations and with the U.S.
networks. Rogers added that it was still negotiating with Videotron and
that an agreement was forthcoming. |
|
Applicant’s reply
|
4.
|
In its reply, Videotron advised the
Commission that it had reached an agreement with Rogers on 12 March
2005. In accordance with this agreement, OMNI.2’s signal would be
distributed on channel 41 as part of the high-penetration tier in analog
mode and on channel 15 as part of the digital basic service in the
Gatineau, Gatineau (Buckingham sector), Thurso, Montebello and Rockland
service areas. Videotron noted that, taking into account the penetration
rate in analog mode and the distribution in digital mode, 82% of its
subscribers would have access to OMNI.2 and that, on account of the
roll-out of digital technology, this number would continue to increase. |
|
The Commission’s analysis and determination
|
5.
|
The Commission is satisfied that the
agreement reached by the parties regarding the channel placement of
OMNI.2 is acceptable. The OMNI.2 signal will be distributed on channel
41 as part of the high-penetration tier in analog mode and on channel 15
as part of the digital basic service in the Gatineau, Gatineau
(Buckingham sector), Thurso, Montebello, Quebec and Rockland, Ontario
service areas. In light of the above, the Commission approves the
application by Videotron (Regional) Ltd., and relieves the licensee, by
condition of licence, of the requirements of sections 17 and 32
of the Regulations with respect to CJMT-TV-2 (OMNI.2) Ottawa. |
|
Secretary General |
|
This decision is to be appended to each
licence. It is available in alternative format upon request, and may
also be examined in PDF format or in
HTML at the following Internet site: http://www.crtc.gc.ca
|
Date Modified: 2005-05-27 |