2000/02/21 - #: 8662-D11-01/00 - Distributel Communications
- Review and Vary Order 2000-38
2001/01/31 - Order 2001-82 The Commission denies Primus/Distributel's
request to rescind Orders CRTC 2000-37 and
2000-38 and: (A) finds
that it has the jurisdiction to issue Orders 2000-37
and 2000-38;
(B) denies Primus/Distributel's request to direct Bell Canada to
apply Item 24.4(d) of its General Tariff to alternate providers of long
distance services' (APLDS) toll traffic which is terminated over extended
area service (EAS) links and to collect unbilled charges in accordance
with its Terms of Service; (C) finds that the interconnection
agreement between the independent telephone companies (ITCs) and Bell
Canada does not apply to the situations contemplated in Orders 2000-37
and 2000-38; (D) denies Primus' request to remove the 25% surcharge as a
proxy for originating minutes in Hurontario's territory; (E) clarifies
that contribution already paid by Primus and Distributel to Bell Canada is
to be taken into account; (F) retains the 15% discount on line-side
access; (G) clarifies that the ITC contribution charge is applicable for
the EAS traffic in question; (H) provides the APLDS with three
alternatives for reporting and billing; (I) finds that there is no
requirement for Bell Canada to amend its tariff pages; and (J) provides an
estimate of the applicants' contribution liability to the respondents
pursuant to this order. Reference: 8662-P11-01/00 and
8662-D11-01/00.
2001/05/16 - Distributel Communications Limited - "Hard Copy
Document"
Description: This is in response to your letter of April 19, 2001
concerning origination and termination of toll traffic via Bell Canada EAS links
in the operating territories of OTA members.
2000/07/24 - Bell Canada
Description: In accordance with the procedures established with respect to the
above-noted proceeding, Bell Canada submits the following reply to comments from Ontario
Telephone Association and Hurontario Telephones Limited (OTA/Hurontario), dated and
received 17 July 2000.
Document:
000724_1.doc - 30KB
2000/07/24 - OTA and Hurontario
Description: Consistent with the procedures set out in your letter of May 26, 2000, as
modified by your letter of June 9, 2000, the Ontario Telephone Association
("OTA") and Hurontario Telephones Limited ("Hurontario") (collectively
"OTA/Hurontario") submit the following reply comments to the comments filed with
the Commission on July 17, 2000 by Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. and Distributel
Communications Ltd. (collectively referred to herein as "Primus/Distributel")
and Bell Canada ("Bell") on the responses, filed with the Commission on July 7,
2000, to the Commission's May 26, 2000 interrogatories
Document:
24July00.doc - KB
2000/07/24 - Primus and Distributel
Description: These reply comments are submitted on behalf of Primus Telecommunications
Canada Inc. ("Primus") and Distributel Communications Ltd.
("Distributel") in respect of the comments on interrogatory responses filed by
SATAT (on behalf of its members and La Compagnie de Téléphone de Warwick), the Ontario
Telephone Association and Hurontario Telephones Ltd. ("OTA/Hurontario") and Bell
Canada ("Bell") on July 17, 2000 in accordance with the procedures established
in the Commission's letters of May 26, 2000 and June 9, 2000.
Document:
Rep-0724.doc - 43 KB
2000/07/24 - SATAT
Description: Suivant la procédure établie dans la lettre du CRTC datée du 26 mai
2000 et modifiée par celle du 9 juin 2000, la SATAT soumet ses observations en réplique
aux observations soumises par les autres parties participant à la présente instance.
Document:
lt000724.doc - 81 KB
2000/07/17 - Bell Canada
Description: In accordance with the procedures established with respect to the
above-noted proceeding Bell Canada submits the following comments regarding the
interrogatory responses filed by the other participants.
Document:
000717_2.doc - MSWord97 - 28KB
2000/07/17 - OTA Hurontario
Description: Consistent with the procedures contained in your letter of May 26, 2000,
as modified by your letter of June 9, 2000, the Ontario Telephone Association
("OTA") and Hurontario Telephones Limited ("Hurontario") (collectively
"OTA/Hurontario") are pleased to provide their comments in relation to the July
7th responses of Bell Canada and of counsel to Primus Canada and Distributel
Communications Limited (collectively "Primus/Distributel") to the Commission's
interrogatories of May 26, 2000 in the above-noted review and variance proceeding.
Document:
17July00.doc - KB
2000/07/17 - Primus and Distributel
Description: These comments are submitted on behalf of Primus Telecommunications
Canada Inc. and Distributel Communications Ltd. in respect of the interrogatory responses
filed by SATAT (on behalf of its members and La Compagnie de Téléphone de Warwick), the
Ontario Telephone Association and Hurontario Telephones Ltd. and Bell Canada in accordance
with the procedures established in the Commissions letters of May 26, 2000 and June 9,
2000.
Document:
00July17.doc - 42 KB
2000/07/17 - SATAT
Description : Demandes de révision et de modification des ordonnances 2000-37 et
2000-38 présentées par Primus Canada et Distributel Communications.
Document:
000717.doc - MsWord - 73KB
2000/07/07 - Primus and Distributel
Description: Interrogatory responses.
Documents:
000707.zip - 48KB
2000/07/07 - Bell Canada
Description: In accordance with the procedures established with respect to the
above-noted proceeding, Bell Canada submits its response to interrogatories.
Documents:
000707.zip - 45 KB
000707.doc - 22 KB
2000/07/07 - OTA Hurontario
Description: Further to your letters of May 26, 2000 and June 9, 2000, please find
enclosed herewith the responses of OTA/Hurontario to the Commission's Interrogatories in
the above-noted proceeding.
Documents:
7July00.doc - KB
7Julycov.doc - KB
2000/06/09 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy
Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Primus/Distributel, OTA/Hurontario, Bell Canada
and SATAT - Subject:
Applications to Review and Vary Orders 2000-37 and 2000-38 by Primus and Distributed
2000/06/06 - Primus Telecommunications
Canada Inc.
Description: Applications to Review and Vary Orders 2000-37 and 2000-38 by Primus and
Distributel.
Document:
Hurdelay.doc - Word 97 Document
2000/05/26 - Commisssion Letter
DESCRIPTION: Letter addressed to Primus/Distributel, OTA/Hurontario, SATAT, Bell
Canada - Subject: Applications to Review and Vary Orders 2000-37 and 2000-38 by Primus and
Distributel
FILE NAME(S):
lt000526b.htm - Hyper Text
Markup - 26 KB
2000/04/20 - Johnston & Buchan on behalf of Primus Telecommunications Canada
Inc. and Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Reply Argument to Applications to Review and Vary Telecom Orders 2000-37
and 2000-38.
Documents:
Reply.doc - MS Word - 31KB
2000/04/10 - Bell Canada
Description: Attached is Bell Canada's answer to applications filed pursuant to Part
VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure on behalf of Primus
Telecommunications Canada Inc. and Distributel Communications Limited seeking review and
variance of Orders 2000-37 and 2000-38 dated 21 January 2000.
Documents:
000410.doc - MSWord97 - 75KB
000410.ppt - PowerPoint - 619KB
2000/04/07 - Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP on behalf of Ontario Telephone
Association and Hurontario Telephones
Description: Attached is the electronic copy filed on behalf of the Ontario Telephone
Association and Hurontario Telephones Limited by Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP. Re:
Answer to Applications on Behalf of Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. to Review and
Vary Telecom Order CRTC 2000-37 and on Behalf of Distributel Communications Limited to
Review and Vary Telecom Order CRTC 2000-38.
Documents: Word
000407.doc - 69KB
2000/04/07 - SATAT
Description: Selon la SATAT, la décision Télécom CRTC 96-6 devrait s'appliquer à
Distributel. Par conséquent, cette dernière aurait dû s'enregistrer auprès des
compagnies de téléphone indépendantes et leur déclarer son trafic entrant et sortant
afin de payer le TSAE total applicable sur chacun des territoires.
000407.doc - 26KB
2000/03/17 - Johnston & Buchan
Description: Please find attached the letter of Mar. 17, 2000, addressed to Peter
McCallum. Re: Applications of Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. and Distributel
Communications Limited to the Federal Court of Appeal for Leave to Appeal and to the CRTC
for Review and Variance.
Documents: WordPerfect
Mccallum.wpd - 8KB
2000/02/21 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Applications seeking review and variance regarding Order CRTC 2000-38.
Documents:
Distributel.zip - Winzip - 15KB
Date Modified: 2002-06-07
|
