|
Order CRTC 2001-831
|
|
Ottawa, 15 November 2001
|
|
CRTC denies TCI's request for an information-filing deadline
|
|
Reference: 8662-T42-03/01
|
|
Background
|
1. |
On 13 September 2001, TELUS Communications Inc. (TCI) filed a
review and vary (R&V) application requesting, among other
things, a review of the Phase II costing method changes rendered in
Decision CRTC 2001-238, Restructured bands, revised loop rates
and related issues, dated 27 April 2001.
|
2. |
In its R&V application, TCI also requested that, effective 1
January 2002, the unbundled loop rates and residential primary
exchange service (PES) costs should be made interim and established
in accordance with the information provided in response to
30 January 2001 interrogatories that were issued in the
proceeding leading to Decision 2001-238.
|
3. |
TCI further requested that, on an interim basis beginning on 1
January 2002, the total subsidy requirement be calculated on the
basis of a 25% mark-up and the PES costs filed in response to the 30
January 2001 interrogatories.
|
4. |
On 18 September, GT Group Telecom Services Corp. requested that
the comments and reply comments in response to TCI's R&V
application be postponed.
|
5. |
In response, by letter dated 20 September 2001, TCI proposed that
all incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) refile with the
Commission their unbundled loop rates and residential PES costs in
accordance with the information provided in response to the
30 January 2001 interrogatories, and adjusted to take into
account the reassignment of some exchanges to new bands.
|
6. |
By letter dated 12 October 2001, the Commission staff granted the
postponement to 16 November 2001 and 26 November 2001, of the
deadline for comments and reply comments, respectively.
|
|
TCI's request
|
7. |
In a letter dated 18 October 2001, TCI requested that, in view of
the delayed process established by the Commission to address its
R&V application, the Commission rule on its request for the
ILECs to file unbundled loop rates and PES costs, as indicated above
in paragraph 5.
|
8. |
TCI submitted that the timely filing of this information will
provide sufficient time for the Commission to establish interim loop
rates and revised residential PES costs using this revised
information, effective 1 January 2002.
|
|
Commission determination
|
9. |
The Commission notes that the PES cost information sought by TCI
to recalculate the total subsidy requirement under its proposal is
available.
|
10. |
The Commission also notes that the loop rates set out in Decision
2001-238 have been approved on an interim basis.
|
11. |
The Commission considers that it is not appropriate to require
the ILECs to file the information in the time frame requested by
TCI.
|
12. |
The Commission therefore denies TCI's request. |
|
Secretary General
|
|
This document is available in alternative format upon request,
and may also be examined at the following Internet site: http://www.crtc.gc.ca
|