From:
scott@folkstone.ca[SMTP:scott@folkstone.ca]Sent: October 4, 2001 12:38 PM
To: procedure@crtc.gc.ca
Subject: Telecom Public NoticeCRTC 2001-37, Price Cap Review and Related Issues
Telecom Public NoticeCRTC 2001-37, Price Cap Review and Related Issues
Oral Hearing October 1, 2001
Submission of Folkstone Design
I live on the Sunshine Coast of B.C., but am speaking to you today from the
Digital Divide Forum at the British Columbia Internet Association
Conference in Penticton.
I am concerned that, while the letter of the "High Cost Service Area
Decision" is being addressed, the spirit of the decision is not.
I am concerned about the quality, cost and medium term obsolescence; in
terms of the National Broadband Task Force recommendations, of
implementation in high cost service areas.
If technologies used in the Nemi'ah Valley, and Hot Springs Cove, BC, are
the benchmark used to determine inclusion of communities in these
proceeding under the terms of the High Cost Service Area Decision, I
believe the cart has been put before the horse.
In submissions by Telus a term similar to "lowest cost technology" is used.
However, a technology decision has be made which has been used to eliminate
communities from these proceedings on the basis of the expense of a
specific technology. Anderson Lake, B.C., is an example of one community
excluded in this way.
New technologies are available which can address concerns of quality, cost
and medium term obsolescence.
I propose that rather than be excluded from these proceedings, all
permanent residence in high cost service areas should be included at the
maximum allowable rate.
Telus have suggested that being the provider of last resort through the use
of subsidies would have the effect of significantly reducing competition.
I suggest that these funds should be held in trust relative to the specific
community and be made available to any organizations who can implement more
forward looking technologies which meet the requirements and spirit of the
High Cost Service Area Decision. This approach may be appropriate to all
high cost service areas.
For this approach to work it should be incumbent upon the resident ILEC to
provide interconnect at the closest point of presence, since rules that
apply to built up urban areas may prove unworkable in remote areas.
This inclusive approach will have the effect of broadening innovation,
encouraging competition, and focusing on factors that enhance potential
market growth.
Thank you for your attention.
Scott Bleackley
Folkstone Design Inc.
604 886-4502